Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Shahin Zarghami, Hamid Arastoopour, Javad Abbasian, Emadoddin Abbasi, Emad Ghadirian
Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL
The overall objective of the program is to develop aComputational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) model and toperform CFD simulations to describe theheterogeneous gas-solid absorption andregeneration and WGS reactions in the context ofmultiphase CFD for a regenerative magnesiumoxide-based (MgO-based) process for simultaneousremoval of CO2 and enhancement of H2 productionin coal gasification processes.
2/29
The Project consists of the following four (4) tasks:
Task1. Development of a CFD/PBE model accounting for the particle (sorbent) porosity distribution and of a numerical technique to solve the CFD/PBE model. (Completed)
Task2. Determination of the key parameters of the absorption and regeneration and WGS reactions. (Close to Completion)
Task3. CFD simulations of the regenerative carbon dioxide removal process. (Close to Completion)
Task4. Development of preliminary base case design for scale up. (In Progress)
3/29
4/29
Process Economics is highly dependent on the CO2 Sorbent properties
CO2 absorption Temperature (300 - 450 ˚C)
Simple regeneration
Sulfur and Steam Resistant
Sorbent Cost (per cycle)
0.01
0.1
1
10
300 350 400 450 500PC
O2
, atm
Temperature, ˚C
DESORPTIONMgCO3 MgO+CO2
Advanced Power Plant
ABSORPTIONMgO+CO2 MgCO3
5/29
Dolomite
Calcination
Impregnation
Re-Calcination
CaCO3, MgO
Half- Calcined Sorbent
CaCO3, MgO , Mg(OH)2, K2CO3
Impregnated Sorbent
CaCO3, MgO , K2CO3
Re-Calcined Sorbent
Fresh Dolomite
Modified Dolomite
MgCa(CO3)2
6/29
T
T
P P
P P
MFC
MFC
P
CO2
N2
Data Acquisition &Control System
PressureRegulator
Bubble Flow meter
Vent
Frit
Bed of Sorbent
Quartz Beads
9 cm
8 cm45 cm
30 cm
Thermocouple
Reactor Body
7/29
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
MgO
Con
vers
ion,
K/Mg Molar ratio
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Tota
l Por
e Vo
lum
e , m
l/gr
K/Mg Molar ratio
Hasanzadeh et al.
8/29
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 10 20 30 40 50
MgO
Con
vers
ion
Time, min
310˚C
340˚C
480˚C
390˚C
430˚CP=20 atmCO2:50 mol%N2:50 mol%
9/29
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
MgO
Con
vers
ion
Time,min
5% Steam10% Steam30% Steam
No Steam
T=430 ˚CP=20 atmCO2:50 mol%N2: Balanced
10/29
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
300 340 380 420 460
MgO
Con
vers
ion
Temperature, ˚C
P=20 atmCO2:50 mol%N2: Balanced30% Steam
10% Steam
Reaction time : 5min
11/29
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Dec
ompo
sitio
n
Time, min
500 ˚C
450 ˚C
550 ˚C
525 ˚C
MgCO3 MgO + CO2
P=20 atmN2=100%
12/29
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Dec
ompo
sitio
n
Time, min
Dry Carbonation-Dry Regeneration
Dry Carbonation-Wet Regeneration
P= 20 barT= 500˚C
Clean Coal Gas
Concentrated H2 Stream
Car
bona
tor
Reg
ener
ator
N2
With & Without Steam
N2 & Steam
13/29
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 5 10 15 20
Dec
ompo
sitio
n
Time, min
T=500˚CP= 20 bar
No CO2
10 mol% CO2
20 mol% CO2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 5 10 15
Dec
ompo
sitio
n
Time, min
T=550˚CP= 20 bar
No CO2
10 mol% CO2
20 mol% CO2
14/29
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
Con
vers
ion
Number of Cycles
Wet Carbonation-Wet Regeneration
Wet Carbonation-Dry Regeneration
Dry Carbonation-Dry Regeneration
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0 4 8 12 16 20 24K
/Mg
Mol
ar ra
tio
Number of Cycles
Wet Carbonation-Wet Regeneration
Wet Carbonation-Dry Regeneration
Dry Carbonation-Dry Regeneration
15/29
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.21 0.24 0.27 0.3
MgO
Con
vers
ion
K/Mg Molar ratio
Fresh SorbentHasanzadeh et al.Carb. Wet (430 C)-Dec. Dry (550 C)Carb. Wet (430 C)- Dec. Wet( 550 C)Carb. Dry (430 C)- Dec. Dry ( 550 C)
16/29
Abbasi et al., Fuel, 2013
3 )1( ZXXrr pp productreact
reactproduct
MM
Z
)
111()1(1
)1)((3
331
32
XZXXXr
Dk
XCCNk
rdtdX
pg
s
eboMgO
s
p
0 ( )g gD D X
Product Layer
Reactive Zone
Un‐reactive Zone
r’p
rp
rc ri
K
Ca Mg
22
1 0 eCD r
r r r
'. .1: @ b pBC C C r r
e. .2 : (C -C ) @ e s i iCBC D k r rr
2
1 ( )4
MgOMgO s i e
i
dNr k C C
r dt
17/29
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
MgO
Con
vers
ion
Time, Min
T= 450 CT= 410 CT= 380 CT= 360 C
CO2/N2/H2O = 50/40/10
Carbonation
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
MgC
O3
Dec
ompo
sitio
n
Time, min
T=550 CT=525 CT=500 CT=450 C
Regeneration
18/29
Preliminary Base case design and Simulation Results
Based on DOE/ NETL Carbon Capture Unit. (Courtesy of Larry Shadle, NETL)
3.35 m
LocationNominal gas Flow
(g/s)
Adsorber 5
Loop seal 1 0.7
Loop seal 2 0.8
Regenerator 1
Move air 0.14
Mean Particle size = 185 μmParticle density = 2480 kg/m3
15 cm
15 cm
20/29
Chugging every 0.4-0.6 sec
21/29
NETL experimental imagesevery 0.4-0.6 sec “Chugging occurs when a large mass of particles
lifts from the fluidized bed and moves into the cone leading into the riser. The cone-constriction prevents particles from flowing smoothly into the riser and particles plug the riser pipe.”
Clark et al., Powder Tech. 2013
a b c
22/29Experimental data reported by Clark et al., Powder Tech. 2013
Syamlal-O’Brien EMMS
23/29
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
MgCO3 conv
ersion
CO2 mole fraction
Time (s)
CO2 mole fraction
MgCO3 conversion
inlet CO2mole fraction T=550◦CP=20 atm
CO2 concentration [=] kmol/m3
24/29
Schaeffer Model
-bypassing of the fluidizing gas through the lower seal pot
- Bubbling standpipe
s fr s kin col s fr s kin col fr
25/29
Schaeffer Model
(With Modified Johnson-Jackson frictional Pressure)
Modified μfr
Schaeffer frictional model (which is based on coulomb law)has two major shortcomings:
1) It is discontinuous (solid volume fraction ~ 0.5)
2) It is under predicting the frictional viscosity
Schaeffer frictional model Continuous frictional model
Sundaresan frictional model Laux frictional model
26/29
model Prediction, Angle of ReposeSchaeffer 0
Sundaresan 21
Laux 29.5
Experiment 36
Investigation of proper modeling of very dense granular flows in the recirculation system of CFBs, Nikolopoulos et al, Particuology, 2012.
Schaeffer frictional model Sundaresan frictional model Laux frictional model
27/29
Effect of WGS reaction
Modeling of combined absorption & WGS reactions
Further modification of solid frictional viscosity.
Completion of full loop simulation by including reaction and
population balance model for density changes.
28/29
Thanks for your attention
29/29
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
300 340 380 420 460
MgO
Con
vers
ion
Temperature, ˚C
P=20 atmCO2:50 mol%N2: Balanced
30% Steam
10% Steam
Reaction time : 5min
MgO + H2O MgO.H2O*
MgO.H2O* + CO2 MgCO3 + H2OWith Steam
MgO + CO2 MgCO3Without Steam30/29
Eulerian- Eulerian Approach in combination with the kinetic theory of granular flow
Assumptions: Uniform and constant particle size and density‐Conservation of Mass
‐ gas phase:
‐ solid phase
‐Conservation of Momentum‐ gas phase:
‐ solid phase
‐Conservation of solid phase fluctuating Energy
‐ solid phase
gggggg mvt
).()(
ssssss mvt
).()(
)(.).()( sggsggggggggggg vvgPvvvt
)(.).()( sggsssssssssssss vvgPPvvvt
Numerical Modeling: Conservation Equations
Generation of energy due to solid
stress tensor
Diffusion dissipation
ssssssssss vIpvt
).(:)(]).()([
23
Abbasi and Arastoopour , CFB10, 2011 31/29
Gas-solid inter-phase exchange coefficient: EMMS model
Heterogeneity Factor
ω < 1 sg
)()1(
43
0 gDsggp
gg Cuud
p
sggg
pg
gg
d
uu
d
)1(75.1
)1(150 2
2
74.0g
74.0g
)( g
0044.0)7463.0(40214.05760.0 2
g
0040.0)7789.0(40038.00101.0 2
g
g8295.328295.31
82.074.0 g
97.082.0 g
97.0g
Numerical Modeling: Drag Correlation
(Wang et al. 2004)
32/29