9
Comcare National Conference Effective Partnerships Today and Tomorrow Dr Jan White Chief Executive Accident Compensation Corporation (NZ) October 2007

Scheme Comparison

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Comcare National Conference Effective Partnerships Today and Tomorrow Dr Jan White Chief Executive Accident Compensation Corporation (NZ) October 2007. Scheme Comparison. ACC also no-fault but covers the whole population Claims volumes differ ACC is the sole insurer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Scheme Comparison

Comcare National Conference

Effective Partnerships Today and Tomorrow

Dr Jan WhiteChief Executive

Accident Compensation Corporation (NZ)

October 2007

Page 2: Scheme Comparison

Scheme Comparison

• ACC also no-fault but covers the whole population

• Claims volumes differ

• ACC is the sole insurer

• Role of the employer differs

• Case management done internally

• Allows self-insurance for some larger businesses

Page 3: Scheme Comparison

Scheme Comparison

• Weekly compensation up to 80%

• Lump sums for permanent impairment

• Stress not included if not caused by injury

• ACC working towards being fully funded

• ACC has no regulatory function in workplace health

and safety

Page 4: Scheme Comparison

Partnership Approach

• Imperative for effective partnerships compelling

• Funding demands partnership approach

• Injury prevention involves everyone

• Service delivery relies on health sector

• Workplace IP and Return-to-Work mandate needs

positive employer relationships

Page 5: Scheme Comparison

Programmes

• Safer Industries Programme - injuries down 8.3% last year

• Partnership Programme – self insurance for bigger firms

• Workplace Safety Management Practices – discount for

good safety performance

• Workplace Safety Discounts – for smaller businesses

• Workplace Safety Evaluations – targets poor performers

Page 6: Scheme Comparison

A Sense of Scale

• 1.8 million new claims last year (4 million

population)

• 73,000 new weekly compensation claims

• 50% returned to work in 28 days

• 80% of claims received electronically and 98%

registered within 24 hours

Page 7: Scheme Comparison

Focus on the Individual

• Individual rehabilitation plans

• Occupational and medical assessments

• Vocational independence assessment

• Transitional assistance

Page 8: Scheme Comparison

Targets

• Sustainable return to work

• 67% back to work in 3 months

• 89.5% back to work in nine months

Page 9: Scheme Comparison

Some Current Initiatives

• New Rehabilitation Framework

• New providers for those with spinal injuries

• NIDMAR

• Pain Management

• Stay at Work trial