S B : C E G C R I P NPaul+Church...from Concord Engineering Group, Inc., 520 S. Burnt Mill Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043. This report may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM: ENERGY AUDIT REPORT

PREPARED FOR: ST. PAUL’S CHURCH

38 DUNCAN AVENUE JERSEY CITY, NJ 07304 ATTN: MS. SUSAN DEN HERDER, PARISH ADMINISTRATOR

PREPARED BY: CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

520 S. BURNT MILL ROAD

VOORHEES, NJ 08043 TELEPHONE: (856) 427-0200

FACSIMILE: (856) 427-6529 WWW.CONCORD-ENGINEERING.COM

CEG CONTACT: SAMUEL DORIA

SENIOR ENERGY ENGINEER EMAIL: [email protected]

REPORT ISSUANCE: FINAL, APRIL 14, 2016

PROJECT NO: 1C15541

St. Paul’s Church Energy Audit Report

Concord Engineering 1C15541 April 14, 2016 – FINAL Page 1 of 61

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 3

II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 10

III. METHOD OF ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 11

IV. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ............................................................... 13

A. ENERGY USAGE / TARIFFS ........................................................................................... 13

B. ENERGY USE INDEX (EUI) ........................................................................................... 18

C. EPA ENERGY BENCHMARKING SYSTEM ...................................................................... 20

V. FACILITY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 22

VI. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 25

VII. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 26

VIII. RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES ................................................ 45

IX. ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY .................................. 47

X. INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS.......................................................................... 56

A. INCENTIVE PROGRAMS: ................................................................................................ 55

B. FINANCING OPTIONS: ................................................................................................... 56

XI. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 60

XII. ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................. 61

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit



REPORT DISCLAIMER

The information contained within this report, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this report, in whole or in part, without written authorization from Concord Engineering Group, Inc., 520 S. Burnt Mill Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043.

This report may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this report in error, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.



I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the findings of the energy audit conducted for:

Entity: St. Paul’s Church in Bergen

Facility: Church and Parish Hall 38 Duncan Avenue

Jersey City, NJ 07304 Contact Person: Ms. Susan M. Den Herder, Parish Administrator

This audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program for the St. Paul’s Church in Bergen. The purpose of this analysis is to provide the owner insight into the energy savings potential that exists within the facility. Energy Efficiency changes and upgrades requires support from the building occupants, operations personnel and the administrators of the building in order to maximize the savings and overall benefit. The efficiency improvement of religious buildings provides a benefit for the environment and the parishioners. The Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) identified within the report represent the potential annual savings at the facility. It is recommended to consider all ECMs as part of the Church’s initiative to save energy, reduce emissions, and lower operating costs. The Church should review and be familiar with all measures presented in the report prior to making a decision on which projects to move forward with. This will enable the Church to effectively align report recommendations with those outlined in their mid/long range facility plans and financial plans. The Church should also review all conventional and unconventional funding, along with all NJCEP funding opportunities for these projects and determine which options fit their budget most positively in the short and long term. The combination of this information will enable the Church to put together an effective Energy Savings Improvement Strategy that maximizes the received benefits of the selected projects. The annual energy costs at this facility are as follows: The potential annual energy cost savings for each energy conservation measure (ECM) and renewable energy measure (REM) are shown below in Table 1. Be aware that all ECM’s and REM’s are not additive because of the interrelation of some of the measures. This audit is consistent with an ASHRAE Level 2 energy audit. The cost and savings for each measure is ± 20%. The evaluations are based on engineering estimations and industry standard calculation methods. More detailed analysis would require engineering simulation models, hard equipment specifications, and contractor bid pricing.

Electricity $3,091

Natural Gas $7,362

Total $10,453



Table 1 ECM Summary Table

The estimated demand and energy savings for each ECM and REM is shown below in Table 2. The descriptions in this table correspond to the ECM’s and REM’s listed in Table 1.

ECM #1 Interior Lighting Upgrade $8,420 $788 10.7 40.4%

ECM #2 Interior Lighting Controls $2,360 $34 69.4 -78.4%

ECM #3 Exterior Lighting Upgrade $1,155 $317 3.6 311.7%

ECM #4Thermostatic Controllers and

Steam Radiator Valves$18,000 $575 31.3 -52.1%

ECM #5Steam Piping and Valve

Insulation$3,800 $288 13.2 13.7%

ECM #6Condensate Pump and Receiver Replacement

$2,170 $90 24.1 -37.8%

ECM #7Window AC Unit

Replacements$980 $80 12.3 22.4%

ECM #8Sanctuary Destratification

Fans$11,400 $306 37.3 -59.7%

ECM #9 Water Conservation $119 $95 1.3 698.3%

Notes:

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTIONSIMPLE

PAYBACK (Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME

ROI

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

ANNUAL

SAVINGSB

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.



Table 2 Energy Savings Summary Table

ECM #1 Interior Lighting Upgrade 5.6 3,667 0

ECM #2 Interior Lighting Controls 0.0 158 0

ECM #3 Exterior Lighting Upgrade 0.5 1,474 0


Steam Radiator Valves0.0 0 623


Insulation0.0 0 312


0.0 16 94


Replacements0.9 373 0


Fans0.0 0 1,300

ECM #9 Water Conservation 0.0 0 35

Total Reduction 7.0 5,688 2,364

ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)


ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)



Table 3 Emissions Summary Table

ECM #1 Interior Lighting Upgrade 5,574 10 24

ECM #2 Interior Lighting Controls 240 0 1

ECM #3 Exterior Lighting Upgrade 2,240 4 10


Steam Radiator Valves7,289 6 0


Insulation3,650 3 0


1,128 1 0


Replacements567 1 2


Fans15,210 12 0

ECM #9 Water Conservation 410 0 0

Notes:


ECM NO.

DESCRIPTION

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION

CO2

EMISSIONS (LBS)

NOX

EMISSIONS (LBS)

SO2

EMISSIONS (LBS)

A. Emissions Reduction based on NJCEP published factors for electric & gas.



Table 4 Facility Project Summary Table

NOTE: Those ECMs with much longer payback periods have been crossed out to keep the total project simple payback around 10 years. A total source energy reduction of 10% could be realized based measures outlined above. This project does not qualify for additional incentives through the Pay for Performance Program; please see the Installation Funding Options section for additional program options.

Interior Lighting Upgrade $788 $9,600 $1,180 $8,420 10.7

Interior Lighting Controls $34 $2,650 $290 $2,360 69.4

Exterior Lighting Upgrade $317 $1,240 $85 $1,155 3.6

Thermostatic Controllers and Steam Radiator Valves

$575 $18,000 $0 $18,000 31.3

Steam Piping and Valve Insulation

$288 $3,800 $0 $3,800 13.2

Condensate Pump and Receiver Replacement

$90 $2,170 $0 $2,170 24.1

Window AC Unit Replacements

$80 $980 $0 $980 12.3

Sanctuary Destratification Fans

$306 $11,400 $0 $11,400 37.3

Water Conservation $95 $119 $0 $119 1.3

Total Project $1,602 $18,389 $1,555 $16,834 10.5

FACILITY PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE

ENERGY CONSERVATION

MEASURES

ANNUAL ENERGY

SAVINGS ($)

PROJECT COST ($)

CUSTOMER COST

SIMPLE PAYBACK

SMART START

INCENTIVES



Overall Assessment: Overall, Saint Paul’s Church is operating less efficiently compared to the National Peer Group Median Source Energy Intensity of 70.7 kBtu/square-foot/year of the comparable building type “Religious Worship”. The Church rates less efficiently than the PEER Group in part due to the age of the windows, doors, roofing systems and steam radiators/controls. The Church is also paying an average cost of energy at $2.84/SF which is above the typical average cost of $2.00/SF. On the whole, Concord Engineering recommends that Saint Paul’s Church review and be familiar with all measures presented in each facility report prior to making a decision on which projects to move forward with. This will enable the Church to effectively align report recommendations with those outlined in their mid/long range facility plans and financial plans. St. Paul’s Church should also review all conventional and unconventional funding options, along with all NJCEP funding opportunities for these projects and determine which options fit their budget most positively in the short and long term. The combination of this information will enable the Church to put together an effective Energy Savings Improvement Strategy that maximizes the received benefits of the selected projects. The Installation and Funding Options Section further outlines what programs are potentially available to the Church for funding the project. Other Considerations: Renewable Energy Conservation Measures: Renewable Energy Measures (REMs) were also reviewed for implementation. Due to the trees and adjacent buildings within the city of Bergen, the roof is shaded throughout a substantial portion of the day. The limited open property of the Parish also eliminated the possibility of a carport PV system. The potential for wind generation was also reviewed for the facility; however based on historical wind speed data for Bergen, NJ it is not a viable option. Energy Procurement Recommendations: It is recommended that the Parish continue its third party purchasing approach for electric and should investigate the possibility of third party purchasing for the natural gas used at this facility. Further recommendations are outlined in the Energy Procurement Section of this report that could assist the Parish in finding additional savings through their utility bills. Demand Response Since this facility is used so infrequently (mostly on weekends) and has no emergency generator, demand response was not considered.



Maintenance and Operational Recommendations: In addition to the ECMs and REMs, there are maintenance and operational measures that can provide significant energy savings and provide immediate benefit, many of which the Parish is already performing. The ECMs listed above represent investments that can be made to the facility which are justified by the savings seen over time. However, the maintenance items and small operational improvements below are typically achievable with on-site staff or maintenance contractors and in turn have the potential to provide substantial operational savings compared to the costs associated. The following are recommendations which should be considered a priority in achieving an energy efficient building, further recommendations per building our provided in the building reports:

A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output.

D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better Indoor Air Quality (IAQ).

E. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode.

F. Replace any old CRT Monitors with LED/LCD Type Monitors, which can draw as much as a quarter the power of an equivalent CRT monitor.

G. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode.



II. INTRODUCTION

This comprehensive energy audit covers the entire St. Paul’s Church in Bergen, NJ. The audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program. The energy audit is conducted to promote the mission of the office of Clean Energy, which is to use innovation and technology to solve energy and environmental problems in a way that improves the State’s economy. This can be achieved through the wiser and more efficient use of energy. Electrical and natural gas utility information is collected and analyzed for one full year’s energy use of the building. The utility information allows for analysis of the complex’s operational characteristics; calculate energy benchmarks for comparison to industry averages, estimated savings potential, and baseline usage/cost to monitor the effectiveness of implemented measures. A computer spreadsheet is used to calculate benchmarks and to graph utility information (see the utility profiles below). The Energy Use Index (EUI) is established for the Main Building. Energy Use Index (EUI) is expressed in British Thermal Units/square foot/year (BTU/ft2/yr), which is used to compare energy consumption to similar building types or to track consumption from year to year in the same building. The EUI is calculated by converting the annual consumption of all energy sources to BTU’s and dividing by the area (gross square footage) of the building. Blueprints (where available) are utilized to verify the gross area of the facility. The EUI is a good indicator of the relative potential for energy savings. A low EUI indicates less potential for energy savings, while a high EUI indicates poor building performance therefore a high potential for energy savings. Existing building architectural and engineering drawings (where available) are utilized for additional background information. The building envelope, lighting systems, HVAC equipment, and controls information gathered from building drawings allow for a more accurate and detailed review of the building. The information is compared to the energy usage profiles developed from utility data. Through the review of the architectural and engineering drawings a building profile can be defined that documents building age, type, usage, major energy consuming equipment or systems, etc. The preliminary audit information is gathered in preparation for the site survey. The site survey provides critical information in deciphering where energy is spent and opportunities exist within a facility. The entire site is surveyed to inventory the following to gain an understanding of how each facility operates:

Building envelope (roof, windows, etc.) Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment (HVAC) Lighting systems and controls

The site visit is performed to survey all major building components and systems. The site visit includes detailed inspection of energy consuming components. Summary of building occupancy schedules, operating and maintenance practices, and energy management programs provided by the building manager are collected along with the system and components to determine a more accurate impact on energy consumption.



III. METHOD OF ANALYSIS

This audit is consistent with an ASHRAE Level 2 energy audit. The cost and savings for each measure is ± 20%. The evaluations are based on engineering estimations and industry standard calculation methods. More detailed analyses would require engineering simulation models, hard equipment specifications, and contractor bid pricing. Post site visit work includes evaluation of the information gathered, researching possible conservation opportunities, organizing the audit into a comprehensive report, and making recommendations on HVAC, lighting and building envelope improvements. Data collected is processed using energy engineering calculations to anticipate energy usage for each of the proposed energy conservation measures (ECMs). The actual building’s energy usage is entered directly from the utility bills provided by the owner. The anticipated energy usage is compared to the historical data to determine energy savings for the proposed ECMs. It is pertinent to note, that the savings noted in this report are not additive. The savings for each recommendation is calculated as standalone energy conservation measures. Implementation of more than one ECM may in some cases affect the savings of each ECM. The savings may in some cases be relatively higher if an individual ECM is implemented in lieu of multiple recommended ECMs. For example implementing reduced operating schedules for inefficient lighting will result in a greater relative savings. Implementing reduced operating schedules for newly installed efficient lighting will result in a lower relative savings, because there is less energy to be saved. The project/entity summary tables are based on the implementation of multiple measures. The analysis is reviewed and determined if the nature of the ECMs will cause a major conflict of the overall savings. When additive measures do not cause a major effect on the overall savings the ECMs are included. Where a major conflict is identified, the combined savings is evaluated appropriately to ensure the overall estimates are ± 20%. ECMs are determined by identifying the building’s unique properties and deciphering the most beneficial energy saving measures available that meet the specific needs of the facility. The building construction type, function, operational schedule, existing conditions, and foreseen future plans are critical in the evaluation and final recommendations. Energy savings are calculated based on industry standard methods and engineering estimations. Energy consumption is calculated based on manufacturer’s cataloged information when new equipment is proposed. Cost savings are calculated based on the actual historical energy costs for the facility. Installation costs include labor and equipment costs to estimate the full up-front investment required to implement a change. Costs are derived from Means Cost Data, industry publications, and local contractors and equipment suppliers. The NJ Smart Start Building® Program incentives savings (where applicable) are included for the appropriate ECM’s and subtracted from the installed cost. Maintenance savings are calculated where applicable and added to the energy savings for each ECM. The life-time for each ECM is estimated based on the typical life of the equipment being replaced or altered. The costs and savings are applied and a simple payback, simple lifetime savings, and simple return on investment are calculated. See below for calculation methods:



ECM Calculation Equations:

SimplePaybackNetCost

YearlySavings

SimpleLifetimeSavings YearlySavings ECMLifetime

SimpleLifetimeReturnonInvestment ROI SimpleLifetimeSavings NetCost

NetCost

LifetimeMaintenanceSavings YearlyMaintenanceSavings ECMLifetime

NetPresentValue CashFlowofPeriod

1 DR

InternalRateofReturn IRR → NetPresentValue 0 CashFlowofPeriod

1 IRR

Net Present Value calculations are based on Discount Rate (DR) of 3%.



IV. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST A. Energy Usage / Tariffs The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the owner. Electric Utility Provider: PSE&G Electric Utility Rate Structure: General Lighting & Power (GLP) Third Party Supplier: Direct Energy Services Natural Gas Utility Provider: PSE&G Utility Rate Structure: General Service Gas – Heating (GSG HTG) Third Party Supplier: None The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The gas usage profile within each facility report shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy. The overall cost for utilities is calculated by dividing the total cost by the total usage. Based on the utility history provided, the average cost for utilities at this facility is as follows: Description Average

Electricity 21.5¢ / kWh

Natural Gas $0.923 / Therm



Table 5 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: PSE&GRate: GLP

Meter No: 236002216Account No: 65 053 569 08

Third Party Utility Provider: Direct Energy ServicesTPS Meter / Acct No:

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION KWH TOTAL BILL

Dec-13 894 $185

Jan-14 2,130 $325

Feb-14 1,068 $199

Mar-14 1,062 $214

Apr-14 1,008 $212

May-14 1,020 $209

Jun-14 1,158 $410

Jul-14 1,536 $451

Aug-14 2,208 $479

Sep-14 804 $386

Oct-14 1,026 $217

Nov-14 1,152 $224

Dec-14 1,026 $201

Jan-15 1,266 $253

Feb-15 1,326 $262

Mar-15 1,344 $265

Apr-15 552 $237

May-15 1,096 $212

Jun-15 1,164 $347

Jul-15 1,428 $365

Aug-15 2,028 $415

Sep-15 1,194 $242

Oct-15 906 $152

Nov-15 1,068 $140

Total 29,464 19.2 Max $6,602

Current 12 Months 14,398 19.2 Max $3,091

AVERAGE DEMAND 9.1 KW average

AVERAGE RATE 0.215 $/kWh

0.0

0.0

0.0

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

DEMAND KW

0.0

0.0

11.5

10.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

13.8

18.0

8.4

13.8

14.5

19.2

12.0

16.7

10.1

9.3

18.1

11.5

13.8

17.3



Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile



Table 6 Natural Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: PSE&GRate: GSG (HTG)

Meter No: 3739601Account No: 70 542 377 06

Third Party Utility Provider: NoneTPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USECONSUMPTION

(THERMS)TOTAL BILL

Dec-13 1,248.03 $1,282.33

Jan-14 1,293.55 $1,401.39

Feb-14 2,267.47 $2,670.20

Mar-14 1,840.46 $2,237.24

Apr-14 1,170.70 $1,211.35

May-14 273.38 $286.06

Jun-14 1.05 $12.05

Jul-14 0.00 $11.09

Aug-14 0.00 $11.17

Sep-14 0.00 $11.17

Oct-14 37.93 $46.18

Nov-14 385.58 $627.60

Dec-14 1,196.77 $1,219.42

Jan-15 1,158.96 $1,160.77

Feb-15 1,411.52 $1,307.10

Mar-15 2,289.65 $2,044.70

Apr-15 744.16 $595.24

May-15 100.56 $87.98

Jul-15 0.00 $22.34

Aug-15 0.00 $11.17

Sep-15 0.00 $11.41

Oct-15 59.05 $56.07

Nov-15 375.04 $311.54

Dec-15 641.40 $534.05

Total 16,495.25 $17,169.62

Current 12 Months 7,977.11 $7,361.79

AVERAGE RATE: 0.923 $/THERM

-

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY



Figure 2 Natural Gas Usage Profile



B. Energy Use Index (EUI) Energy Use Index (EUI) is a measure of a building’s annual energy utilization per square foot of building. This calculation is completed by converting all utility usage consumed by a building for one year, to British Thermal Units (BTU) and dividing this number by the building square footage. EUI is a good measure of a building’s energy use and is utilized regularly for comparison of energy performance for similar building types. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Buildings Technology Center under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy maintains a Benchmarking Building Energy Performance Program. The ORNL website determines how a building’s energy use compares with similar facilities throughout the U.S. and in a specific region or State. Source use differs from site usage when comparing a building’s energy consumption with the national average. Site energy use is the energy consumed by the building at the building site only. Source energy use includes the site energy use as well as all of the losses to create and distribute the energy to the building. Source energy represents the total amount of raw fuel that is required to operate the building. It incorporates all transmission, delivery, and production losses, which allows for a complete assessment of energy efficiency in a building. The type of utility purchased has a substantial impact on the source energy use of a building. The EPA has determined that source energy is the most comparable unit for evaluation purposes and overall global impact. Both the site and source EUI ratings for the building are provided to understand and compare the differences in energy use. The site and source EUI for this facility is calculated as follows:

BuildingSiteEUIElectricUsageinkBtu FuelUsageinkBtu

BuildingSquareFootage

BuildingSourceEUIElectricUsageinkBtu SSRatio FuelUsageinkBtu SSRatio

BuildingSquareFootage



Table 7

Energy Use Index Summary

The chart above depicts the Site and Source Energy for the facility. The comparable building type in this instance is classified as “Religious Worship” with a median Site Energy of 36.8 kBtu/SF and a Source Energy of 70.7 kBtu/SF as obtained from the U.S. National Peer Group Comparison Rating published by Department of Energy in July, 2013. The Median Source Energy Use Intensity is the recommended benchmark metric for all buildings, and is the middle value of the national population meaning half the buildings use more energy, and half use less. The reference source for this data comes from the Department of Energy’s Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS).

kWh Therms Gallons kBtu kBtu

ELECTRIC 14,398.0 49,155 3.340 164,177

NATURAL GAS 7,977.0 797,700 1.047 835,192

TOTAL 846,855 999,369

BUILDING TYPE

BUILDING AREA 8,370 SQUARE FEET

BUILDING SITE EUI 101.18 kBtu/SF/YR 36.8 kBtu/SF/YR

BUILDING SOURCE EUI 119.40 kBtu/SF/YR 70.7 kBtu/SF/YR

69%

*Site - Source Ratio data is provided by the Energy Star Performance Rating Methodology for Incorporating Source Energy Use document.

AUDITED BUILDING PEER COMPARISON

Religious Religious Worship

Less Efficient than PEER Comparison

ENERGY USE INTENSITY CALCULATION

ENERGY TYPEBUILDING USE

SITE ENERGY

SITE-SOURCE RATIO

SOURCE ENERGY



C. EPA Energy Benchmarking System The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in an effort to promote energy management has created a system for benchmarking energy use amongst various end users. The benchmarking tool utilized for this analysis is entitled Portfolio Manager. The Portfolio Manager tool allows tracking and assessment of energy consumption via the template forms located on the ENERGY STAR website (www.energystar.gov). The importance of benchmarking for local government municipalities is becoming more important as utility costs continue to increase and emphasis is being placed on carbon reduction, greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts. Based on information gathered from the ENERGY STAR website, Government agencies spend more than $10 billion a year on energy to provide public services and meet constituent needs. Furthermore, energy use in commercial buildings and industrial facilities is responsible for more than 50 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. It is vital that local government municipalities assess facility energy usage, benchmark energy usage utilizing Portfolio Manager, set priorities and goals to lessen energy usage and move forward with priorities and goals. In accordance with the Local Government Energy Audit Program, CEG has created an ENERGY STAR account for the Church to access and monitoring the complex’s yearly energy usage as it compares to facilities of similar type. The login page for the account can be accessed at the following web address; the username and password are also listed below:

https://www.energystar.gov/istar/pmpam/index.cfm?fuseaction=login.login

The above log in information allows the Church to continue to utilize Portfolio Manager to track and monitor their energy performance. For further direction on how to use the Portfolio Manager Tool such as adding properties, entering data, and viewing results, see training material and live training sessions provided by Energy Star that can be found on their website at www.energystar.gov/buildings/training



The utility bills and other information gathered during the energy audit process are entered into the Portfolio Manager. The following is a summary of the results for the facility:

Table 8 ENERGY STAR Performance Rating

ENERGY STAR PERFORMANCE RATING

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

ENERGY PERFORMANCE

RATING

NATIONAL AVERAGE

St. Paul’s Church 13 50

Refer to Statement of Energy Performance Appendix for the detailed energy summary for the Church.



V. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The original section of this 8,370 SF facility was built in 1889. The building is mostly a single-story facility with the Parish Hall being a 2-story building. The facility is comprised of the sanctuary, sacristy, parish hall/stage, music room, nursery, kitchen, offices, restrooms, storage rooms, basement boiler room, etc.

Occupancy Profile

The typical hours of operation for the facility are as follows:

Sanctuary Sunday 8 Hours

Tuesday 4 Hours

Wednesday 3 Hours

Thursday 2 Hours

Saturday 2 Hours

Parish Hall Sunday 4 Hours

Monday 3 Hours

Tuesday 2 Hours

Wednesday 2 Hours

Thursday 2 Hours

Friday 2 Hours

Saturday 5 Hours

Summer Camp 6 Weeks x 10 Hours = 60 Hours

2nd Floor 8 hours per week = 400 Hours

Crafts/Offices 5 hours per week = 250 Hours

Girl Scouts 2 hours per week = 100 Hours

Music 2 hours per week = 100 Hours

The Church has services on Sundays and is also used for other ceremonies/activities especially in the Parish Hall. Due to this, the occupancy profile varies widely based on the day of the week. The average congregation is reported to be 100 people for the main Sunday service. There are approximately three employees that normally occupy the facility.

Building Envelope

Exterior walls for the Church portion of the building along with the 3-story bell tower are comprised of wood shingles over wood sheathing. It is assumed that this wood sheathing is attached to the exterior wall stonework from the original construction. The Church interior walls



have a one inch gap and plaster walls in the inner layer. Based on the year of construction, Concord Engineering estimates that there is no insulation in the wall components. The wooden columns that support the inner trusses are set on brick masonry piers. The windows throughout the Church portion of the facility are single pane un-insulated glass with wooden frames that are in poor condition. The wooden frames are deteriorated from water leakage, failed window seals, and no weep holes in the window frames. Also, there is a failure of the caulking around the wooden frames.

The windows in the Church are stained glass in the inside with a single glass panel on the outside to protect the stained glass. A visual inspection of each of these Church windows showed that caulking and weather-stripping needs to be maintained to reduce the amount of air infiltration.

The wooden entrance doors to the Church portion of the facility have a 1/8 inch gap at the threshold and a gap in the main entry wooden doors. This allows unconditioned air to enter the Church and back entrance, leading to increased energy usage to heat and cool the spaces.

The crawl space under the building has a dirt floor, and all of the exposed areas of brick along the foundation walls have been covered by stucco. The pitched roof consists of wood rafters and trusses with asphalt shingles over a roofing felt and ¾-inch plywood sheathing.

HVAC Systems

The entire building is heated by a Smith Model Series 28A-5 cast-iron sectional, gas-fired, steam boiler rated at 1,491 MBH input and 1,166 MBH output for a thermal efficiency of approximately 80%. The burner is a Power Flame Model J50A-15 with a 1/3 HP blower motor. The steam and condensate piping insulation is deteriorated and large portions of the piping are bare. A steam condensate/receiver collects the steam condensate and pumps the recovered hot water to the boiler.

Steam radiators are located underneath each perimeter window and in entrances, stairwells and vestibules. These units are manually controlled and several of the steam valves are not operating properly.

Concord Engineering recommends that the Church install thermostatic steam valves at each steam radiator to more effectively control steam usage.

The supplemental heating and cooling for the Sanctuary is performed by four (4) LG Model LSU360HV3 mini-split heat pump units with air-cooled condensers outside mounted on pads and the evaporator units mounted on the walls in the Sanctuary. These units are rated at 33,100 BTUH of cooling and a cooling efficiency of 16.1 SEER. The heating capacity is 35,200 BTUH with an efficiency of 9.9 HSPF.

The Parish Hall is air conditioned by four (4) window units. The units are rated at 1-ton of cooling each. Several offices have window air conditioning units rated from 8,000 BTU/Hour to 12,000 BTU/Hour of cooling capacity.



Exhaust System

There are various exhaust fans on the roof and wall-mounted that exhausts the restrooms, storage rooms, day care center, etc.

The kitchen is served by a thru-the-wall exhaust fan connected to the kitchen exhaust hood.

HVAC System Controls

The facility heating is controlled by local thermostats and heating equipment is turned off manually. The steam boiler is on a timer which shuts off the boilers based on an occupied/unoccupied time schedule. The following temperatures are maintained at the Church/Parish Hall:

70°F Occupied Church

72°F Occupied Parish Hall

65°F Un-Occupied Parish Hall

65°F Un-Occupied Church Domestic Hot Water

The facility is provided domestic hot water by an A. O. Smith Model FCG 75 300 300 gas-fired, automatic storage water heater rated at 75 MBH with a 74-gallon capacity and a thermal efficiency of 80%.

Plumbing The sink faucets are rated at 2.2 gallon per minute. The water closets and urinals located in the restroom areas have a rating of 2.6 and 2.0 gallons per flush, respectively.

Lighting

Refer to the Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix for a detailed list of the lighting throughout the facility and estimated operating hours per space.



VI. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the complex and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix. Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.



VII. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES

ECM #1: Interior Lighting Upgrade Description: A large portion of the interior lighting throughout the Church is provided by T12 fluorescent fixtures with magnetic ballasts that are very inefficient compared to the latest lighting technology. These fixtures would be replaced by new LED lighting fixtures with identical light output. Additional lighting in the facility is 700 series and 741/ECO 32W T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Although these T8 lamps are considered fairly efficient, further energy savings can be achieved by replacing the existing T8 lamps with Light Emitting Diode (LED) direct replacement T8 ballast compatible lamps without compromising light output. The exit signs would also be replaced by high-efficiency LED units. This ECM also includes replacement of any incandescent lamps with LED lamps which can be retrofit into existing incandescent A-lamp fixtures. LED lamps provide equivalent lumens and much longer burn hours but at reduced wattages. Energy Savings Calculations:

The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of fixtures in the each building.

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 5.6Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 3,667

Electric Cost Savings ($) $788

LIGHTING UPGRADE SAVINGS SUMMARY



Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $9,600

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,180

Net Installation Cost ($): $8,420

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $788

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $788

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15.0

Simple Payback 10.7

Simple Lifetime ROI 40.4%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $11,820

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 5%

Net Present Value (NPV) $987.09

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY



ECM #2: Interior Lighting Controls Upgrade – Occupancy Sensors Description: Some of the lights in the Parish Hall are left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control 20% - 28% energy savings.

Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 20% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors (The majority of the savings is expected to be after hours when rooms are left with lights on) This ECM includes installation of ceiling or switch mount sensors for offices, large storage rooms, conference rooms, and restrooms. The larger rooms/spaces will have multiple sensors that will automatically turn off lights when the spaces are unoccupied. These new sensors will contain the latest dual-sensor technology (passive infrared and ultrasonic activated). The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls.



Energy Savings Calculations:

kWh/YrEnergyLightControlledSavings%SavingsEnergy

kWh

$CostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings.

Rebates and Incentives:

From the NJ Smart Start® Program Incentives Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: SmartStartIncentive

#Wallmountsensors $20persensor#Ceilingmountsensors $35persensor


DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 0.0Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 158


LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGS SUMMARY


NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $290





Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 69.4

Simple Lifetime ROI -78.4%


Simple Lifetime Savings $510

Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -15%

Net Present Value (NPV) ($1,954.11)




ECM #3: Exterior Lighting Upgrade Description: Exterior lighting throughout Saint Paul’s Church is provided by various types, sizes and wattages of metal halide wall-mounted fixtures and canopy 60-watt incandescent lamp fixtures. This ECM includes the replacement of existing fixtures with new high-efficiency LED lighting fixtures that require a lower energy use for the same light output. LED bulbs and diodes have an outstanding operational life time expectancy of 100,000 hours which equates to 22 years at 50% operation. This results in substantial savings in bulb replacement. Exterior lighting is controlled via time clock and typically operates from dusk to dawn or less. Energy Savings Calculations:

The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix outlines the hours of operation, proposed retrofits, costs, savings, and payback periods for each set of exterior fixtures on the building. Maintenance Savings and Project Costs: Maintenance savings is negligible for this ECM and has not been included in the energy savings summary. Project Costs were obtained from lighting vendor quotes and a local lighting contractor.

DESCRIPTION SAVINGSElectric Demand Savings (kW) 0.5Electric Usage Savings (kWh) 1,474


LIGHTING UPGRADE SAVINGS SUMMARY











Simple Payback 3.6





Net Present Value (NPV) $2,629.33




ECM #4: New Thermostatic Steam Valves/Controllers Description: This facility has steam radiators on the perimeter walls of the church mostly underneath the windows. Due to the equipment age, the two-way valves and controls do not function properly so the rooms are often not heated properly leading to occupant discomfort and increased energy costs. During our site survey, we counted a total of 18 existing steam valves that would be excellent candidates for replacement with newer electronically actuated 2-way control valves. This measure would install the newest generation of thermostatic valves on the steam pipe feeding each radiator unit which would improve control of the heating. Thermostatic controls are self-contained and are suitable for radiators, fin-tubes, baseboards or convector units. These new thermostatic valves have the capability of setting an upper limit to prevent overheating of the spaces. The valves include a remote sensor for accurately measuring the return air temperature for better heating control. Energy Savings Calculations: In our experience, we have seen a 10% to 15% reduction in heating cost from installation of new thermostatic steam valves/controls. Based on heating degree day analysis, the energy used to heat the spaces controlled by these steam valves is estimated to be approximately 6,230 Therms. The annual energy savings has been estimated to be approximately 10% of 6,230 or 623 Therms. At an average cost of $0.923/Therm, the annual heating cost savings would be $575. The basis of design is the ISTEC 2000 Series Thermostatic Valve/Control or equal which has a total installation cost (including valve, sensor, piping changes, etc.) of $1,000 per unit. Replacement of 18 existing older control valves x $1,000/unit for the new thermostatic valves/controls = $18,000. Final quantities and sizes will be confirmed during the engineering phase of the project. Project costs were obtained from a local Mechanical Contractor.











Simple Payback 31.3









ECM #5: Reconfigure Steam Piping & Steam/Condensate Piping Insulation Description: The existing gas-fired steam boiler delivers 212°F steam to various steam radiators throughout the facility. During the site inspection, numerous sections of steam and condensate piping in the boiler room were observed to be un-insulated or the insulation has failed due to leakage/deterioration of the insulating material. The high temperature of the steam (212ºF) causes more heat transfer to occur between the piping un-insulated surfaces and the surrounding space resulting in excess gas usage at the steam boiler. The existing steam loop could also be zoned to heat the following areas independently due to varied occupancy in each zone: 1 – Sanctuary 2 – 1st Floor of Parish Hall 3 –2nd Floor of Parish Hall This ECM would reconfigure the steam piping, install three (3) steam zone valves along with electronic valve controls, insulate all bare steam/condensate piping and re-insulate failed steam & condensate piping insulation in the boiler room. Energy Savings Calculations: Q = K (Delta T) / L + (K/Ht) Q = Heat Loss (BTU/Hr. / Sq. Ft.) K = Thermal Conductivity (25) L = Insulation Thickness Delta T = Surface Temp – Ambient Temp Ht = Combined Coefficients (3.2) for Radiation, Convection & Conduction Natural Gas Savings = (Q x Sq. Ft. x Operating Hours x $/Therm) / (100,000 BTU/Therm) An Excel spreadsheet was used to calculate the energy savings from insulating the steam piping in the boiler room as follows:

$9.23

2918

1"

80

Surface Area Bare Bare Bare Insulated Insulated Insulated Fuel Fuel

Qty. Size Description Temp. (Ea.) Heat Loss Heat Loss Heat Loss Heat Loss Heat Loss Heat Loss Savings Savings

(Sq.ft.) (BTU/Hr/SF) (BTU/Hr) mmBtu (BTU/Hr/SF) (BTU/Hr) mmBtu mmBtu/yr $/yrCentral Steam Boiler

2 2" Supply Steam Valve 170 5.20 192.0 1,996.80 5.83 23.40 243.41 0.71 5.12 $47.2240 2" Supply Steam Piping 212 50.0 38.0 76,000.00 221.77 34.32 68,646.85 200.31 21.46 $198.0420 2" Condensate Piping 170 50.0 25.0 25,000.00 72.95 23.40 23,404.49 68.29 4.66 $42.97

TOTAL 31.2 $288

Operating Hours per Year:

Fuel Cost ($/mmBTU):

Steam Valve/Piping Insulation Savings

Amb. Temp:

Insulation Thickness:



The cost of insulating 60 linear feet of 2-inch piping and two (2) steam valves with 1-inch insulation is approximately $3,800. Re-configuring the steam piping in the boiler room along with three (3) steam zone valves and electronic controls is an additional $8,000. Concord Engineering does not recommend re-configuring the steam loop into three (3) zones due to the installation cost and small energy savings since the boiler gas savings would be minimal. Project costs were obtained from a local Mechanical Contractor. Energy Savings Summary:








Simple Payback 13.2





Net Present Value (NPV) ($361.87)




ECM #6: Condensate Pump and Receiver Replacement

Description: The steam condensate pump and receiver set in the basement boiler room is leaking condensate from the receiver and pump seal. The lost condensate is a loss of water which is costly and the loss of 1900F water that is not pumped back to the steam boiler. Cold make-up water (600F) has to be heated in the boiler resulting in a loss of energy. This ECM would install a new condensate pump and receiver set in the boiler room that would match the existing set capacity. Energy Savings Calculations: The loss of condensate was estimated and the energy required to heat the make-up water from 600F to 2000F was calculated. The existing condensate pump has an older less efficient motor and the efficiency gained by installing a premium motor was also calculated.

UNIT FUNCTION BUILDING MOTOR MOTOR HR/DAY ANNUAL PREMIUM ANNUAL ANNUAL $ COND ANNUAL TOTAL $ EQUIP.& TOTAL PAY# HP EFF.% OPER. KWh EFF.% KWh KWh SAV. LOSS HTG ENERGY INST. COST BACK

SAVINGS $0.215 QT/MIN $ SAV SAV (E&G) COST NOTE 2 YEARSSingle CP COND. PUMP Subbasement Boiler Room 0.5 70.0% 2 126 80.0% 111 16 $3 0.10 $87 90$ $1,400 $2,170 24.0

TOTALS= $3 90$ $2,170 24.0

NOTE 1: KWH= HP / MOTOR% * 746 /1000 * HR/DAY * 180* 0.8(MOTOR LOAD) * 0.9 PFNOTE 2: INCLUDES 15% FOR ENG & DESIGN + 25% FOR RETROFIT WORK+ 15% CONTR. OH&PNOTE 3: SAVINGS CALCULATED ON HEATING MAKE-UP FROM 60 F TO 200 F AND $0.923/THERM AND 80% EFFICIENT BOILER PLANT











Simple Payback 24.1


Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0







ECM #7: Window AC Unit Replacement

Description: The primary source of cooling for some of the offices is window air conditioning units. These units vary in size, capacity and efficiency. These window AC units are old and inefficient. It is recommended to utilize the Energy Star ratings as a minimum standard for replacing any window unit that is in need of replacement. Existing units that are old but still working should be considered for replacement if the efficiency is 8.5 EER or less. Window AC units that are over 10 years old are very likely to fall in this efficiency range. This ECM shows the savings and payback for inefficient window air conditioners with new, Energy Star rated units. Qualifying product list can be found at Energy Star website at: www.energystar.gov/products. Although Energy Star rated products provide a valuable benchmark, it is recommended to consider even higher EER ratings for potential AC unit replacements where available. Energy Savings Calculations: Average Electric Cost: $0.215/kWh Typical AC Unit Size: 8,000 BTU/HR or 12,000 BTU/HR Estimated Full Load Hours of Unit: 400/Year

EnergySavings, kWh CoolingCapacity,BTUHr

1EER

1EER

FullLoadHours

1000 WkWh

DemandSavings, kWEnergySavings kWhHoursofCooling

CoolingCostSavings EnergySavings kWh AverageSummerElec. Cost$

kWh

Capacity BTU/H

Amount of Units

Full Load Hrs

Typical Eff. (10 Yrs &

Older) EER

New Eff. EER

Energy Savings

kWh

Demand Savings kW

Cooling Cost

Savings

Net Installed

Cost

Simple Payback

8,000 1 400 8.5 11.3 93 0.23 $20 $280 14.0

12,000 2 400 8.5 11.3 280 0.70 $60 $700 11.7

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS




Installation Cost ($): $980


Net Installation Cost ($): $980





Simple Payback 12.3





Net Present Value (NPV) ($24.97)




ECM #8: De-stratification Fans Description: The Sanctuary at Saint Paul’s Church is heated by steam radiators. In rooms with high ceilings typically stratification of heated air occurs, resulting in air at ceiling level being warmer than the floor. Since temperature at the floor level dictates the comfort of occupants and is typically the location of the thermostat controlling the system, this results in additional operating hours to satisfy space conditions. This ECM would install four (4) Airius Model A25 de-stratification fans in the Sanctuary to be suspended from the ceiling, with all required electrical wiring and supports. These fans should only operate during heating season to help maintain a higher floor temperature and reduce cycling time. Energy Savings Calculations: The calculations are based on the manufacturer’s percent savings utilizing the height of the ceiling and associated temperature differential between floor and ceiling. The temperature differential in this case was estimated at 12.6 degrees Fahrenheit. HeatingEnergy kBtu 80%OversizeFactor SpaceHeatingCapacity HDDAdj. Factor 24

∆

Savings kBtu HeatingEnergy PercentSavings

FanPowerPenalty kWh FanPower W WinterOperatingHours1kWh1,000W

Each A25 unit has a 32 watt fan.



ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Description Existing SanctuaryProposed Sanctuary

w/ Fans

Space Heating Type Steam Radiators Steam Radiators

Space Heating Capacity (MBH) 455 455

Heating Efficiency (%) 80% 80%

Heating Degree Days (65 F) 5062 5062

Degree Day Adjustment Factor 0.45 0.45

Space Ceiling Height (ft) 25 25

Ceiling-Floor T (oF) 12.6 12.6

Percent Energy Savings - 22%

Destrat Fan Power (kWh) - 112

Heating Energy (kBtu) 162,580 126,812

Electric Rate ($/kWh) $0.215 $0.215Natural Gas Rate ($/Therm) $0.923 $0.923

Electric Usage (kWh) 0 112 (112)

Natural Gas Usage (therm) 1,626 1,268 358

Energy Cost ($) $1,501 $1,195 $306

COMMENTS:

DESTRATIFICATION FAN ANALYSIS


Ceiling-Floor Temperature Differential Based on 0.5 F per Foot











Simple Payback 37.3









ECM #9: Water Conservation Description: Saint Paul’s Church utilizes standard plumbing fixtures. The typical water faucet consumption only meets the minimum federal required standard for water efficiency. New fixtures are available that use less water than today’s requirements and can add up to significant water reduction over a long period. This ECM includes the retrofitting of the existing faucets within the facility with new low-flow aerators. The number of aerators to be replaced is based on observations of the facility. (Please note that the estimate of occupants for the Church is an estimate based on daily employees at the facility) The proposed retrofit includes installation of low flow aerators at the kitchen and restroom sinks. The basis of design used for this calculation was the Niagara Conservation Pressure Compensating Dual-Thread Kitchen Aerator. Energy Savings Calculations: Faucets:

WaterUsage OccupancyDaysyr

UsesDay

DurationminUse

FixtureGalMin

BTU 3,412

kWh)70(

Gal

lbs 8.33(Gallons)n ConsumptioerFaucet Wat(kWh)Cost Electric FT

ElectricUsage

FaucetWaterUsage Gal 8.33lbsGal

SpecificHeat 1 ∆T 70

3,412Btu

1HWHEfficiency

The cost for installation and materials is based on four (4) faucet aerators. There are no Smart Start rebates for installation of low flow plumbing fixtures.



ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Quantity of Sinks 4 4

Flow Rate (GPM) 2.2 1.0 1.2

Device Usage (min per day) 10 10

Facility Operation (days / year) 200 200

Heat Content of Water (Btu/gal/°F) 8.33 8.33

Temperature Rise (°F) 70.0 70.0

Efficiency of Heating System (%) 80% 80%

Conversion Factor for Natural Gas 100000 100000

Natural Gas Rate ($/Therm) $0.92 $0.92

Water Rate ($/1000gal) $6.50 $6.50

Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 64 29 35

Water Usage (gallons) 17,600 8,000 9,600

Energy Cost ($) $174 $79 $95COMMENTS:

LOW FLOW WATER SAVING DEVICES


Heating Savings based on 50% Hot Cold Mix




Installation Cost ($): $119


Net Installation Cost ($): $119





Simple Payback 1.3





Net Present Value (NPV) $1,015.10




VIII. RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES Globally, renewable energy has become a priority affecting international and domestic energy policy. The State of New Jersey has taken a proactive approach, and has adopted in its Energy Master Plan a goal of 30% renewable energy by 2020. To help reach this goal, New Jersey created the Office of Clean Energy under the direction of the Board of Public Utilities and instituted a Renewable Energy Incentive Program to provide additional funding to private and public entities for installing qualified renewable technologies. A renewable energy source can greatly reduce a building’s operating expenses while producing clean environmentally friendly energy. Concord Engineering has assessed the feasibility of installing renewable energy measures (REM) for the facility utilizing renewable technologies and concluded that there is no potential for either solar or wind energy generation.



IX. ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY Load Profile: Load Profile analysis was performed to determine the seasonal energy usage of the facility. Irregularities in the load profile will indicate potential problems within the facility. Consequently based on the profile a recommendation will be made to remedy the irregularity in energy usage. For this report, the facility’s energy consumption data was gathered in table format and plotted in graph form to create the load profile. Refer to the Electric and Natural Gas Usage Profiles included within this report to reference the respective electricity and natural gas usage load profiles. Electricity: The electricity usage profile demonstrates a summer cooling dominated load profile from winter to summer. The average summer (May-September) demand is 22% more than the average winter (October-April) demand, while the consumption profile is fairly flat year round. The following table outlines the seasonal average monthly consumption and demand for the facility:

ELECTRIC UTILITY SEASONAL LOAD PROFILE

DESCRIPTION

SEASONAL AVERAGES

KWH PER MONTH

KW PER MONTH

Summer (May to September) 1,364 10.18

Winter (October to April) 1,131 8.36

Avg. Load increase Winter to Summer 1,247.5 9.27

The historical usage profile is less than favorable as typically winter commodity rates are lower due to reduced demand on the grid, compared with summer. Third Party Supplier (TPS) electric commodity contracts that offer a firm, fixed price for 100% of the facilities electric requirements and are lower than the PSE&G’s BGS-FP default rate are recommended. Natural Gas: The Natural Gas Profile demonstrated a heating dominated load profile, with fuel use in the winter attributed to the single steam boiler. The average summer (May – September) consumption (gas-fired domestic water heater) is approximately 21 times less than the average winter (October- April) consumption (gas-fired steam boiler). The follow table outlines the seasonal average monthly gas consumption for the facility:



NATURAL GAS UTILITY SEASONAL LOAD PROFILE

DESCRIPTION

SEASONAL AVERAGES

THERMS PER MONTH

Summer (May to September) 54.89

Winter (October to April) 1,177.67

Avg. Load increase Summer to Winter 616.28

Typically natural gas pricing is higher during the peak winter heating season, meaning this profile would yield less than favorable prices. Tariff Analysis: Electricity: The facility receives electrical service from Public Service Electric & Gas (PSE&G) under commercial rate classifications General Light & Power (GLP). The facility has contracted a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to provide electric commodity service. Direct Energy Services has been contracted however; the contract particulars such as product structure, price, term and conditions were not available for review or comments. For electric supply (generation) service, the client has a choice to either use PSE&G’s default service rate BGS Capacity or contract with a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to supply electricity. Review of the current billing revealed the average price of electric supply to the church averaged 14.85 cents per kilowatt-hour over the last 16 months and most recently down to a fixed price of 11.09 cents the last 6 months. Each year since 2002, the four New Jersey Electric Distribution Companies (EDCs) - Public Service Gas & Electric Company (PSE&G), Atlantic City Electric Company (ACE), Jersey Central Power & Light Company (JCP&L), and Rockland Electric Company (RECO) - have procured several billion dollars of electric supply to serve their Basic Generation Service (BGS) customers through a statewide auction process held in February. BGS refers to the service of customers who are not served by a third party supplier or competitive retailer. This service is sometimes known as Standard Offer Service, Default Service, or Provider of Last Resort Service. The Auction Process has consisted of two auctions that are held concurrently, one for larger customers on an hourly price plan (BGS-CIEP) and one for smaller commercial and residential customers on a fixed-price plan (BGS-FP). The utility will continue to be responsible for maintaining the existing network of wires, pipes and poles that make up the delivery system, which will serve all consumers, regardless of whom they choose to purchase their electricity or natural gas from. PSE&G’s delivery service rate



includes the following charges: Customer Service Charge, Distribution Charge (kWh and Demand), Societal Benefits Charge (SBC), and Securitization Transition Charge. Natural Gas: The facilities currently receive natural gas distribution service from Public Service Electric & Gas under rate schedules General Service Gas Heating Service (GSG-HTG). The Church has not contracted with a Third Party Supplier (TPS). For natural gas supply service, the client has a choice to either use the utility’s default service rate BGSS or contract with a Third Party Supplier (TPS) to supply natural gas commodity service. The utility provides basic gas supply service (BGSS) to customers who choose not to shop from a Third Party Supplier (TPS) for natural gas commodity. The option is essential to protect the reliability of service to consumers as well as protecting consumers if a third party supplier defaults or fails to provide commodity service. The utilities are responsible for maintaining the existing network of wires, pipes and poles that make up the delivery system, which will serve all consumers, regardless of whom they choose to purchase their electricity or natural gas from the utility’s delivery service rate includes the following charges: Customer Service Charge, Distribution Charge, & Societal Benefits Charge (SBC).

Electric and Natural Gas Commodities Market Overview:

In our region, electricity is produced by natural gas, nuclear, coal and renewables. Much of the recent electricity price fluctuations can be attributed to the spot natural gas pricing variations on generation that produces electricity and the retirement of coal plants that result in increased production demand from other sources of generation.

It is important to note that both natural gas and electric commodity market prices are moved by supply and demand, political conditions, market technicals and trader sentiment. The market is continuously changing Energy commodity pricing is also correlated to weather forecasts. Because weather forecasts are dependable only in the short-term, prolonged temperature extremes can really cause extreme price swings.

Short Term Energy Outlook - US Energy Information Administration (February 2015):

U.S. Natural Gas Prices. Natural gas spot prices averaged $1.93/MMBtu at the Henry Hub in December, a decrease of $0.016/MMBtu from November. The monthly average natural gas price is expected rise through 2016, but will remain lower than $3/MMBtu until December. Projected Henry Hub natural gas price averages $2.65/MMBtu in 2016 and $3.22/MMBtu in 2017.

Natural gas futures prices for December 2015 delivery (for the five-day period ending September 3, 2015) averaged $2.91/MMBtu. Current options and futures prices imply that market participants place the lower and upper bounds for the 95% confidence interval for December 2015 contracts at around $2.08/MMBtu and $4.06/MMBtu, respectively.



U.S. Electricity Retail Prices. EIA expects the U.S. residential price of electricity to average 12.7 cents per kilowatt-hour in 2016, which is unchanged from the average price last year. EIA has projected retail sales of electricity to the commercial sector to grow by 0.9% in 2016, and grow by 1.1% in 2017.



U.S. Petroleum Product Prices. EIA projected lower crude oil prices for this winter compared to less with a forecast reduction in heating oil expenditures. Compared to last winter retail heating oil prices are expected to average $2.17/Gal this winter, 87 cents/gallon less than last year.

Contracting with Third Party Suppliers and BGS Bidding Options Cooperative Purchasing: Cooperative Purchasing agreements allow multiple parties to come together under the premise of using purchasing power in order to reduce the price for goods and services. In this instance the Cooperative is under the unified goal of reducing energy prices for its members. As such members of the cooperative pool their respective energy consumption together into a single bid to obtain low cost energy pricing. Many Cooperatives have a formal bidding process and insure all suppliers provide the required documentation and paperwork necessary per New Jersey Administrative Code and Procurement Law. In addition, a Master Agreement is incorporated into the bid specifications with terms and conditions for the energy supply award protecting Local Government Entities. Concord Energy Services does not recommend signing any Third Party Supplier contract or agreement unless it has been heavily vetted by an attorney that understands commodity law and regulation. Many government clients that have signed third party supplier contracts are now experiencing regulatory pass-thru charges due to vague or inadvertently agreed terms and conditions. Important information can be found on DCA’s website regarding Cooperative Purchasing. Please visit web link: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/dlgs/programs/lpcl_docs/Procuring_Power_Supply_through_a_Cooperative_Purchasing_System.pdf



It is important with any commodity procurement undertaking that you incorporate a rational, defensible strategy for purchasing commodity in volatile markets based upon the following:

Budgets that reflect sound market intelligence An understanding of historical prices and trends Awareness of seasonal opportunities (e.g. shoulder months) Negotiation of fair contractual terms An aggressive, market based price

Bidding Practices and Processes:

Different bid processes and methodologies can create different objectives, but transparency is always a primary goal. Closed bid competitive purchase RFBs, online bid receipt or online reverse auctions can be utilized. Firms which can provide online bidding and reverse auctions are approved by the New Jersey Division of Local Government Services pursuant to the Local Unit Electronic Technology Program, (P.L.2001, c. 30). Approved firms can be found on the website at: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/dlgs/programs/lpcl.html. The Board of Public Utilities also offers a list of energy suppliers available for each service territory that can be found on the website at: http://www.bpu.state.nj.us/bpu/commercial/shopping.html#nbr1 Over the last decade, Concord Energy Services has been involved with numerous approaches to bidding including the Traditional Sealed Bid format and Online Reverse Auction methods. In our experience, Online Reverse Auctions do not always produce optimum results for retail commodity purchases. The procurement consultant with the Client should determine a bidding practice that will yield optimum results and create a robust competitive environment. Many factors will come into consideration to determine whether the Online Bidding and/or Reverse Auction method is appropriate. Factors such as annual consumption, number and complexity of accounts, potential supplier participation as well as rate tariffs must be taken into consideration. LGE’s Purchasing Options:

Per DCA’s paper entitled “Taking Advantage of Lower Electric Rates for your Government Agency” they state, “First, it is important to emphasize that procurement of power supply must be consistent with the Local Public Contracts Law (LPCL) or for boards of education, the Public School Contracts Law (PSCL). Bottom line: When the estimated amount of spending for power supply is above the contracting unit’s bid threshold, power supply must be publicly bid or purchased subject to an exception to the bid law. “Full text can be found via web link: http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/dlgs/programs/lpcl_docs/Taking_Advantage_of_Lower_Electric_Rates_for_your_Government_Agency.pdf

1. Cooperative Purchasing

“When local governments put aside provincial interests in exchange for the broader benefits to be achieved through Cooperative Purchasing, they can secure the provision and performance of goods and services at a lower cost. Cooperative Purchasing has demonstrated a strong ability to serve as an effective tool to assist local officials save taxpayer dollars. Cooperative Purchasing represents viable alternatives to the conventional “go-it-alone” bidding process. “ Many



Cooperatives in the state utilize online bidding to secure attractive electricity and natural gas supply service. Utilizing a Cooperative is highly recommended. Benefits can include:

• Increase staff effectiveness • Reduce duplication of bidding and contract processing • Reduce time, effort and costs associated with developing and managing the bid process • Leverage established and large volume pricing of contracted products • Great alternative contract option to save time, money and ensure quality products &

services

2. Online Reverse Auctions and Online Sealed Bids

“For local government entities, the requirement to bid does not mean the solicitation of quotes; it means a formal process where there is a bid specification, notice to bidders, and a level playing field for all potential bidders. The Division’s E-Procurement Pilot program (authorized under P.L. 2001, c. 30) allows local units to purchase commodities and services, including energy supply, through online bidding and reverse auctions programs approved by the Division. Any online organization participating in the online pilot program must be approved by the Division. Once the Division has approved an online service, any local unit can take advantage of the service. When conducted through an online service, however, the local unit is responsible to ensure that the online service is operating consistent with procurement laws for an individual procurement.” Both online reverse auctions and online sealed bids can produce significant cost savings results. The process is transparent and seamless. Many platforms are very flexible allowing for full customization to meet the Client’s needs.

All providers of online reverse auction and online bidding charge a fee indirectly to LGE’s. The fee is included in the bid pricing shown by suppliers as a $/kWh or $/therm charge and paid directly by the supplier to the vendor. Although LGE’s do not have to formally bid for this type of service should they utilize a DCA pre-approved vendor, we would recommend that any and all fees paid by the supplier to the vendor be disclosed prior to any engagement of services. An overview of both the Online Reverse Auction vs Sealed bid format was published in the NJBIZ Spring of 2007. To view this article, please go to web link: http://www.nbizmag.com/magarticles/sealedbidvsreverseauction.pdf Benefits can include:

• Provides full transparency during the procurement process with unbiased decision making

• Drives prices down through real-time competition • Allows client to actively participate during the entire auction or online bidding process • Execution of contracts are completed within hours of the auction’s close



• Places the focus for suppliers solely on price, since all other factors and related contracting documentation is received and pre-qualified before the final auction bid due date

• Full audit and archival capabilities to substantiate award decisions • Improves knowledge capture, transfer and re-use capabilities

3. Traditional Sealed Bid Format

This type of bid format is not endorsed by the Division of Local Government Services for the bidding of power supply. However, in a recent review of bidding methodologies and which methodology would likely to produce lower cost results, a NJ Government Agency allowed suppliers to choose the bidding format. The bidding options allowed were either via an Online Reverse Auction or via a Traditional Sealed Bid. The Agency understood that many suppliers will not participate in an online auction format or methodology and wanted to allow all NJBPU suppliers to participate. The Agency is the 2nd largest Cooperative in the state which includes participants from five Counties and over 200 municipalities. After the online reverse auction bid was closed and the traditional sealed bids opened and reviewed, the Agency awarded the electricity contract to a bidder that was the lowest price and submitted their bid via the Traditional Sealed Bid Format. The below recommendations presented by Concord Energy Services are based on current information provided by the owner for their facilities historical energy usage. Any savings presented with these recommendations are estimates only based on that information. It is recommended that further analysis and review of more recent utility data and actual TPS electricity and natural gas supply contracts and historical billings be performed prior to performing any of the presented recommendations. Recommendations: 1. Concord recommends that the Parish continue its approach for 3rd party commodity supply

procurement strategies for the purchase of electricity and apply a similar approach for natural gas purchases. Using a 3rd party commodity supply approach for both electricity and natural gas allows the Parish to continue to achieve lower prices in commodity supply costs over the utility default service programs. Energy commodities are among the most volatile of all commodities, however at this point and time, energy is extremely competitive and contract terms longer than 12 months are desirable. Contracts due to expire in the near term would continue to yield very favorable pricing. It is important to aggregate usage where available and take advantage of these current market prices quickly, before energy costs increase. Furthermore, given the parishes low consumption it may be more beneficial to join a purchasing cooperative group that in aggregate would bid out a larger consumption block, and potentially reduce the price per kilowatt-hour.

2. After review of the utility consumption report and current commodity pricing outlook, Concord recommends that the owner utilize the advisement of a 3rd party unbiased Energy Consulting Firm licensed by the State of New Jersey Board of Public Utilities that is



experienced in the procurement of commodities, New Jersey procurement laws, aggregation of facilities and energy supply risk and commodity management. This firm should be able to provide full service advisement over the term of the contract, provide market watch opportunities and identify any additional opportunities that may further reduce costs. Many of these opportunities may include: energy rates; utility bill auditing; energy data analytics; and efficiency improvements. It is important that a rational, defensible strategy for purchasing commodity in volatile markets is incorporated. Examples include:

Budgets that reflect sound market intelligence An understanding of utility and market historical prices and trends Awareness of seasonal opportunities (e.g. shoulder months) Negotiation of fair contractual terms An aggressive, market based price

3. Concord also recommends that the Parish consider utilizing a third party utility billing-

auditing service to further analyze historical utility invoices such as water, sewer, natural gas, electricity and fuel oil for incorrect billings and rate tariff optimization services. This service can be based on a shared savings model with no direct cost. The service could provide refunds on potential incorrect billings that may have been passed through by the utilities and paid by the owner.



X. INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS CEG has reviewed various funding options for the Church to utilize in subsidizing the costs for installing the energy conservation measures noted within this report. Below are a few alternative funding methods: A. Incentive Programs: Pay For Performance (www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/pay-performance) The New Jersey Pay for Performance Program includes incentives based on savings resulted from implemented ECMs. The program is available for all buildings that were audited as part of the NJ Clean Energy’s Local Government Energy Audit Program. The owner’s participation in the program is assisted by an approved program partner. An “Energy Reduction Plan” is created with the owner and approved partner to shown at least 15% reduction in the building’s current energy use. Multiple energy conservation measures implemented together are applicable toward the total savings of at least 15%. No more than 50% of the total energy savings can result from lighting upgrades / changes. Total incentive is capped at 50% of the project cost. The program savings is broken down into three benchmarks; Energy Reduction Plan, Project Implementation, and Measurement and Verification. Each step provides additional incentives as the energy reduction project continues. The benchmark incentives are as follows:

1. Energy Reduction Plan – Upon completion of an energy reduction plan by an

approved program partner, the incentive will grant $0.10 per square foot between $5,000 and $50,000, and not to exceed 50% of the facility’s annual energy expense. (Benchmark #1 is not provided in addition to the local government energy audit program incentive.)

2. Project Implementation – Upon installation of the recommended measures along

with the “Substantial Completion Construction Report,” the incentive will grant savings per KWH or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum saving must be 15%. (Example $0.09 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.10/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $0.90 / Therm for 15% savings, $1.00 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from projected savings above 15%.

3. Measurement and Verification – Upon verification 12 months after

implementation of all recommended measures, that actual savings have been achieved, based on a completed verification report, the incentive will grant additional savings per kWh or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum savings must be 15%. (Example $0.09 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.10/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $0.90 / Therm for 15% savings, $1.00 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from verified savings above 15%.



Based on the provided data and the estimated energy savings of each measure, the Church does not qualify for additional incentives through this program. Direct Install Program (www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/direct-install) The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Direct Install Program is a state funded program that targets small commercial and industrial facilities with peak demand of less than 200 kW. This turnkey program is aimed at providing owners a seamless, comprehensive process for analysis, equipment replacement and financial incentives to reduce consumption, lower utility costs and improve profitability. The program covers up to 70% of the cost for eligible upgrades including lighting, lighting controls, refrigeration, HVAC, motors, variable speed drives, natural gas and food service. Participating contractors (refer to www.njcleanenergy.com) conduct energy assessments in addition to your standard local government energy audit and install the cost-effective measures. The Church would qualify for the Direct Install Program, however currently the program has suspended accepting applications. It is anticipated applications will once again be accepting in the coming months.



Smart Start Program (www.njcleanenergy.com/commercial-industrial/programs/nj-smartstart-buildings/nj-smartstart-buildings) Prescriptive Measures - The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Smart Start prescriptive measures incentives include unit pricing incentives for installation of energy efficient equipment and controls. Proposed equipment and controls must meet the minimum efficiency requirements as well as other application requirements. The Smart Start prescriptive incentives applicable for new construction, renovations, remodeling and equipment replacements, for a wide range of equipment including:

Electric Chillers Gas Cooling Electric Unitary HVAC Ground Source Heat Pumps Gas Heating Variable Frequency Drives Gas Water Heating Premium Motors Prescriptive Lighting Lighting Controls Commercial Kitchen Equipment Technical Studies

Custom Measures - The New Jersey Clean Energy’s Smart Start prescriptive measures incentives include all measures not identified in the prescriptive measures category or measures that must have savings verified through additional analysis such as energy model simulations. Custom measures are intended to include savings as a result of unique energy efficiency measures, which are typically facility specific such as waste heat recovery. Custom incentives are provided based on the amount of energy saved and minimum internal rate of return in order to be eligible. The owner should refer to the Clean Energy Program website for further details on specific incentives available. (www.njcleanenergy.com) Concord Engineering recommends the Owner review the use of the above-listed funding options in addition to utilizing their standard method of financing for facilities upgrades in order to fund the proposed energy conservation measures.



A. Financing Options: The following section outlines various funding mechanisms available to fund energy efficiency projects. It is the local government unit’s responsibility to verify these funding sources adhere to all required federal, state, and local finance laws. Lease to Own (Leaseback) A lease to own arrangement is where the seller of an asset (i.e. building, equipment, etc.) leases back the same asset from the purchaser. In a leaseback arrangement, the specifics of the arrangement are made immediately after the sale of the asset, with the amount of the payments and the time period specified. Essentially, the seller of the asset becomes the lessee and the purchaser becomes the lessor in this arrangement. A leaseback arrangement is useful when entities need to un-tie the cash invested in an asset for other investments, but the asset is still needed in order to operate. Leaseback deals can also provide the seller with additional tax deductions. The lessor benefits in that they will receive stable payments for a specified period of time. Power Purchase Agreement Public Law 2008, Chapter 3 authorizes contracts of up to fifteen (15) years for energy purchase contracts commonly known as “power purchase agreements.” These are programs where the contracting unit (Owner) procures a contract for, in most cases, a third party to install, maintain, and own a renewable energy system. These renewable energy systems are typically solar panels, windmills or other systems that create renewable energy. In exchange for the third party’s work of installing, maintaining and owning the renewable energy system, the contracting unit (Owner) agrees to purchase the power generated by the renewable energy system from the third party at agreed upon energy rates. On-Bill Financing On-bill financing allows a loan for energy efficiency measures to be repaid over time via an additional line item on the recipient’s utility bill, which decreases repayment risk for the lender. The lender in “classic” utility on-bill financing has traditionally been the utility itself. Hybrid models have also emerged in which public and private funds are pooled to offer low-interest loans, with repayment similarly attached to the utility bill. The utility then collects the payment and returns it to the lender, which lowers the lender’s administrative costs. The utility customer benefits from lower energy costs after retrofits, and typically pays loans back over a period of about 2–5 years. This model has also recently become available with Third Party Commodity Suppliers allowing for energy efficiency project funding to be rolled into their bill for the customer. If the owner is interested in this funding mechanism they should contact their local utility or third party supplier if any such program is offered. Alternatively if the owner’s current third party supply contract is expiring this could be included as an option when bidding for new suppliers.



XI. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS In addition to the ECMs and REMs, there are maintenance and operational measures that can provide significant energy savings and provide immediate benefit, many of which facility’s staff are already performing. Maintenance items and small operational improvements are typically achievable with on-site staff or maintenance contractors and in turn have the potential to provide substantial operational savings compared to the costs associated. The following are recommendations which should be considered a priority in achieving an energy efficient building.

H. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

I. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

J. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output.

K. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

L. Turn off computers when not in use. Ensure computers are not running in screen saver mode.

M. Replace any old CRT Monitors with LED/LCD Type Monitors, which can draw as much as a quarter the power of an equivalent CRT monitor.

N. Ensure outside air dampers are functioning properly and only open during occupied mode.



XII. ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS The assumptions utilized in this energy audit include but are not limited to following:

A. Cost Estimates noted within this report are based on industry accepted costing data such as RS MeansTM Cost Data, contractor pricing and engineering estimates. All cost estimates for this level of auditing are +/- 20%. Prevailing wage rates for the specified region has been utilized to calculate installation costs. The cost estimates indicated within this audit should be utilized by the owner for prioritizing further project development post the energy audit. Project development would include investment grade auditing and detailed engineering.

B. Energy savings noted within this audit are calculated utilizing industry standard procedures and accepted engineering assumptions. For this level of auditing, energy savings are not guaranteed.

C. Information gathering for each facility is strongly based on interviews with operations personnel. Information dependent on verbal feedback is used for calculation assumptions including but not limited to the Operating Hours, Equipment Type, Control Strategies, and Scheduling.

D. Information contained within the major equipment list is based on the existing owner documentation where available (drawings, O&M manuals, etc.). If existing owner documentation is not available, catalog information is utilized to populate the required information.

E. Equipment incentives and energy credits are based on current pricing and status of rebate programs. Rebate availability is dependent on the individual program funding and applicability. It is the owner’s responsibility to ensure installed measure equipment meets NJOCE program rules and requirements to receive incentives.

F. Equipment (HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, & Lighting) noted within an ECM recommendation is strictly noted as a basis for calculation of energy savings. The owner should use this equipment information as a benchmark when pursuing further investment grade project development and detailed engineering for specific energy conservation measures.

G. Utility bill annual averages are utilized for calculation of all energy costs unless otherwise noted. Accuracy of the utility energy usage and costs are based on the information provided. Utility information including usage and costs is estimated where incomplete data is provided.

H. Greenhouse Gas Emissions are calculated for each ECM, the basis for these emissions reductions are NJCEP published standard emissions factors, which are the following:.

a. Electric Savings: 1. CO2: 1.52 lbs/kWh 2. NOX: 0.0028 lbs/kWh 3. SO2: 0.0065 lbs/kWh

b. Natural Gas Savings: 1. CO2: 11.7 lbs/therm 2. NOX: 0.0092 lbs/therm

Appendix Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc.

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN (IRR)

NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV)

MATERIAL LABORREBATES,

INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost)

(Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Interior Lighting Upgrade $4,200 $5,400 $1,180 $8,420 $788 $0 $788 15 $11,820 $0 40.4% 10.7 4.57% $987.09

ECM #2 Interior Lighting Controls $2,000 $650 $290 $2,360 $34 $0 $34 15 $510 $0 -78.4% 69.4 -14.97% ($1,954.11)

ECM #3 Exterior Lighting Upgrade $340 $900 $85 $1,155 $317 $0 $317 15 $4,755 $0 311.7% 3.6 26.65% $2,629.33

ECM #4Thermostatic Controllers and Steam

Radiator Valves$9,000 $9,000 $0 $18,000 $575 $0 $575 15 $8,625 $0 -52.1% 31.3 -8.04% ($11,135.69)

ECM #5 Steam Piping and Valve Insulation $1,900 $1,900 $0 $3,800 $288 $0 $288 15 $4,320 $0 13.7% 13.2 1.65% ($361.87)

ECM #6Condensate Pump and Receiver

Replacement$1,085 $1,085 $0 $2,170 $90 $0 $90 15 $1,350 $0 -37.8% 24.1 2.65% ($24.97)

ECM #7 Window AC Unit Replacements $980 $0 $0 $980 $80 $0 $80 15 $1,200 $0 22.4% 12.3 2.65% ($24.97)

ECM #8 Sanctuary Destratification Fans $8,000 $3,400 $0 $11,400 $306 $0 $306 15 $4,590 $0 -59.7% 37.3 -9.68% ($7,746.99)

ECM #9 Water Conservation $80 $39 $0 $119 $95 $0 $95 10 $950 $0 698.3% 1.3 79.60% $691.37

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWN

CONCORD ENGINEERING

St. Paul's Church in Bergen

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGS

ECM LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY



APPENDIX B

Appendix B Page 1 of 6

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, further details including how to apply, forms, and calculated incentive values can be found the Clean Energy Website. (www.njcleanenergy.com)

Electric Chillers

Water-Cooled Chillers

Constant Speed: Base: $8 - $30 per ton

Performance Add: $2 - $2.25 per ton Variable Speed:

Base: $12 - $44 per ton Performance Add: $2 - $4.00 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers

Constant Speed: Base: $20 per ton

Performance Add: $3.50 per ton Variable Speed:

Base: $90 - $92 per ton Performance Add: $4.00 per ton

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2013

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers (Indirect & Direct-Fired)

$185 - $450 per ton

Desiccant Systems

$1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC

Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $92 per ton Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton

Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton

Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

A/C Economizing Controls < 5 tons $85/unit; >5 tons $170/unit Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007


Gas Heating

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH

Non-Condensing: $0.95 per MBH,

Minimum $400 per unit Condensing:

$2.00 per MBH, Minimum $1000 per unit

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH

Non-Condensing: $1.75 per MBH

Condensing: $2.20 per MBH

Minimum $1000 per unit

Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers >1500 - ≤ 2500 MBH



Hot Water Gas Fired Boilers >2500 - ≤ 4000 MBH



Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers < 300 MBH


Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers ≥ 300 – 1500 MBH

$1.20 per MBH

Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers > 1500 – 2500 MBH

$1.20 per MBH

Steam, Except Natural Draft, Gas fired Boilers > 2500 – 4000 MBH

$1.00 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft < 300 MBH


Steam, Natural Draft ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH

$1.00 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft >1500 - ≤ 2500 MBH

$0.90 per MBH

Steam, Natural Draft >2500 - ≤ 4000 MBH

$0.70 per MBH

All Types Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH

(Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 95%

Boiler Economizing Controls $1,200 - $2,700

Low Intensity Infrared Heating $300 - $500 per unit

Natural Gas Water Heating Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons, 0.67

energy factor or better $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH

Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH

Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit


Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Variable Frequency Drives Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp

Chilled-Water Pumps ≥ 20 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Rotary Screw Air Compressors ≥ 25 hp $5,250 to $12,500 per drive Centrifugal Fan Applications on

Constant Volume HVAC Systems $80 per VFD rated hp, maximum

$6,000 per drive Cooling Towers ≥ 10 hp $60 per VFD rated hp

Boiler Fans > 5 HP $65 to $155 per hp

Boiler Feed Water Pumps > 5 HP $60 to $155 per hp

Commercial Kitchen Hood up to 50 HP Retrofit $55 – $300 per hp

New Hood $55 - $250 per hp

Prescriptive Lighting

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

For retrofit of T-8 fixtures by permanent de-lamping & new reflectors

(Electronic ballast replacement required)

$5 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $25 - $150 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replace with new induction fixture.

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$70 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture


Prescriptive Lighting - LED

LED Architectural Floor and Spot Luminaires

$50 per fixture

LED Bollard Fixtures $50 per fixture

LED Display Case Lighting $30 per display case

LED Fuel Pump Canopy $100 per fixture

LED High-Bay and Low-Bay Fixtures for Commercial & Industrial Bldgs.

$150 per fixture

LED High-Bay-Aisle Lighting $150 per fixture

LED Linear Ambient Luminaires (Indirect, Indirect/Direct, Direct/Indirect, Direct)

2’ Fixtures - $20/fixture 3’ Fixtures - $30/fixture 4’ Fixtures - $45/fixture 6’ Fixtures - $60/fixture 8’ Fixtures - $75/fixture

LED Linear Replacement Lamps (2’ & 4’ only)

$5 per lamp

Luminaires for Ambient Lighting of Interior Commercial Spaces

(1x4, 2x2, 2x4 New Fixtures and Retrofit Kits)

1x4 LED - $15 per fixture 2x2 LED - $15 per fixture 2x4 LED - $25 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Area and Roadway Luminaries

$100 per fixture

LED Outdoor Pole/Arm-Mounted Decorative Luminaries

$50 per fixture

LED Outdoor Wall-Mounted Area Luminaries

$100 per fixture

LED Parking Garage Luminaries $100 per fixture

LED Retrofit Kits for Large Outdoor Pole / Arm-Mounted Area and

Roadway Luminaires $150 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium

and low temperature display case

$30 per 4 foot $42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

LED Shelf-Mtd. Display & Task Lights $15 per linear foot


LED Stairwell and Passageway Luminaires

$40 per fixture

LED Track or Mono-Point Directional Lighting Fixtures

$30 per fixture

LED Wall-Wash Lights $30 per fixture

EnergyStar Commercial Lighting Fixtures

$5 to $10 per fixture

EnergyStar Screw and Pine-Based Bulbs

$5 to $10 per lamp

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted (Existing Facilities Only)

$20 per control

Remote Mounted (Existing Facilities Only)

$35 per control

Daylight Dimming Controls $45 per fixture controlled

Occupancy Based hi-low Dimming Control

$35 per fixture controlled

Occupancy Sensor Remote Mounted High-Bay (Existing Facilities Only)

$35 per control

Refrigeration Doors/Covers

Energy-Efficient Doors/Covers for Installation on Open Refrigerated Cases

$100 per door

Aluminum Night Curtains for Installation on Open Refrigerated Cases

$3.50 per linear foot

Refrigeration Controls

Door Heater Controls $50 per control Electric Defrost Controls $50 per control Evaporator Fan Controls $75 per control Novelty Cooler Shutoff $50 per control

Refrigerator / Freezer Case Premium Efficiency Motors

Fraction ECM Motor < 1 HP $40 per ECM for replacement of

existing shaded-pole motor


Food Service Equipment

Combination Oven/Steamer (Electric) $1,000/oven

Combination Oven/Steamer (Natural Gas)

$750/oven

Convection Oven (Electric) $350/oven

Convection Oven (Natural Gas) $500/oven

Rack Oven (Natural Gas) $1,000/single oven, $2,000/double oven

Conveyor Oven (Natural Gas) $500/small deck $750/large deck

Fryer (Electric) $200/vat

Fryer (Natural Gas) $749/vat

Large Vat Fryer (Electric) $200/vat

Large Vat Fryer (Natural Gas) $500/vat

Griddle (Electric) $300/griddle

Griddle (Natural Gas) $125/griddle

Steam Cooker (Electric) $1,250/steamer

Steam Cooker (Natural Gas) $2,000/steamer

Insulated Holding Cabinets $200 to $300/unit

Glass Door Refrigerators $75 to $150/unit

Solid Door Refrigerators $50 to $200/unit

Glass Door Freezers $200 to $1,000/unit

Solid Door Freezers $100 to $600/unit

Ice Machines $50 to $500/unit

Dishwashers $400 to $1,500/unit

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2007 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives

not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000

KWh or 1,500 Therms and an IRR of at least 10%.



APPENDIX C

ENERGY STAR® Statement of EnergyPerformance

13ENERGY STAR®

Score1

St. Paul's Church

Primary Property Type: Worship FacilityGross Floor Area (ft²): 8,370Built: 1889

For Year Ending: October 31, 2015Date Generated: March 09, 2016

1. The ENERGY STAR score is a 1-100 assessment of a building’s energy efficiency as compared with similar buildings nationwide, adjusting forclimate and business activity.

Property & Contact Information

Property AddressSt. Paul's Church38 Duncan AvenueJersey City, New Jersey 07304

Property OwnerSt. Paul's Church in Bergen38 Duncan AvenueJersey City, NJ 07306(____)____-______

Primary ContactVanessa Foster38 Duncan AvenueJersey City, NJ [email protected]

Property ID: 4851871

Energy Consumption and Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

Site EUI93.2 kBtu/ft²

Annual Energy by FuelNatural Gas (kBtu) 730,847 (94%)Electric - Grid (kBtu) 48,935 (6%)

National Median ComparisonNational Median Site EUI (kBtu/ft²) 58.7National Median Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) 69.3% Diff from National Median Source EUI 59%

Source EUI110 kBtu/ft²

Annual EmissionsGreenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric TonsCO2e/year)

45

Signature & Stamp of Verifying Professional

I ___________________ (Name) verify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

Signature: _______________________Date: ___________

Licensed Professional

Vanessa Foster38 Duncan AvenueJersey City, NJ [email protected]

Professional Engineer Stamp(if applicable)



APPENDIX D

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering

Terminal Units

Terminal UnitsTag

Unit Type Steam Radiators

Qty 12

Location Various

Area Served Entire Facility

Manufacturer -

Model No. -

Serial No. -

Heating Type Steam

Heating Capacity -

Heating Efficiency 78% (Steam Boiler)

Approx Age 40

ASHRAE Service Life 30

Remaining Life 0

CommentsSome steam valves are not

operating properly

Note:

"N/A" = Not Applicable. "-" = Info Not Available

Appendix D - Major Equipment List -St. Paul's Church REVISION 2 Page 1 of 6


Boiler

BoilersTag B-1

Unit Type Cast-Iron Sectional (Steam)

Qty 1

Location Basement Boiler Room

Manufacturer Smith Cast Iron Boilers

Model No. Series 28A-5

Serial No. N2000-1024

Input Capacity (MBH) Burner Capacity = 1,491 Max.

Output Capacity (MBH) 1,162 ( IBR Gross Output)

Approx. Efficiency % 78%

Fuel Type Natural Gas

Approx Age 15


Remaining Life 15

CommentsPower Flame Burner M/N: J50A-15 with

1/3 HP Blower Motor

Note:




Dom HWH

Domestic Water HeatersTag DHW-1

Unit Type Domestic Water Heater

Qty 1

Location Rectory

Area Served Entire Facility

Manufacturer A.O. Smith

Model # FCG 75 300 300

Serial # N07A134533

Storage Size (Gal) 75

Input Capacity (MBH/KW) 300 MBH

Recovery (Gal/Hr) 72.8

Efficiency % 80%

Fuel Natural Gas

Approx Age 8


Remaining Life 7

Comments

Note:




Condensing Units

Condensing UnitsTag CU-1 to CU-4

Unit Type Mini-Split

Qty 4

Location Outside

Area/Unit Served Church

Manufacturer LG

Model No. LSU360HV3

Serial No. -

Refrigerant Type R-410a

Cooling Capacity 3 Tons

Cooling Efficiency 16.1 SEER

Volts / Phase / Hz 208-230/1/60

Approx Age 2


Remaining Life 18

CommentsIndoor Unit Model #

LSN360HV3

Note:




Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc.Tag

Unit Type Residential Refrigerator 12 Burners w/ 2 Ovens Microwave

Qty 1 1 1

Location Kitchen Kitchen Kitchen

Manufacturer Whirlpool Garland Panasonic

Model No. WRT3L1SZYF00 - -

Fuel Electric Gas Electric

Comments 8 Years Old Over 20 Years OldApproximately 8

Years Old

Note:"N/A" = Not Applicable

"-" = Info Not Available



Kitchen-Misc

Kitchen / Misc.Tag

Unit Type

Qty

Location

Manufacturer

Model No.

Fuel

Comments

Note:"N/A" = Not Applicable

"-" = Info Not Available

Microwave Kitchen Exhaust Hood

1 1

Kitchen Kitchen

RCA Accurex

- -

Electric N/A

Approximately 10 Years Old

2 Years Old




APPENDIX E

CEG Project #:

Facility Name:

Address:

City, State, Zip

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn HoursDescription

Lamps per Fixture

Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures

Total kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Work Description Equipment DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings, kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #

Controls DescriptionQty of

ControlsHour

Reduction %

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Material Total Labor Total AllRebate

EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal

MaterialsTotal Labor Total All

Simple Payback

1 Pantry 300 13W CFL 1 13 1 0.01 4 Re-Lamp 8W LED A-Lamp 1 8 1 0.01 2 0.01 2 $0 5Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Remote Mnt.

1 20.0% 0 $0 $15.00 $47.50 $62.50 $5.00 178.29 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 2083.33

2 Stage 3002-Lamp 6"x8' T12

Fluorescent STD Lamp2 80 1 0.08 24 New Fixture

2-Lamp LED Ceiling-Mounted Wrap Fixture

2 24 1 0.02 7 0.06 17 $4 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $120.00 $95.00 $215.00 $50.00 45.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

3 Stage 300 65W Incandescent 1 65 1 0.07 20 Re-Lamp 12W BR30 LED 1 12 1 0.01 4 0.05 16 $3 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $20.00 $47.50 $67.50 $5.00 18.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Parish Hall 1200 4-Lamp 2x4 T12 Recessed 4 175 9 1.58 1,890 New Fixture 4-Lamp 2x4 LED 4 48 9 0.43 518 1.14 1,372 $295 5Dual Technology


3 20.0% 104 $22 $1,350.00 $855.00 $2,205.00 $450.00 5.95 $600.00 $150.00 $750.00 $35.00 32.08

5 Kitchen 400 4-Lamp 2x4 T8 with EB 4 131 2 0.26 105 Re-LampPhilips LED T8 InstaFit Lamp

(12 W)4 48 2 0.10 38 0.17 66 $14 5

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor -

Remote Mnt.1 20.0% 8 $2 $60.00 $95.00 $155.00 $10.00 10.16 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 130.21

6 Summer Camp Office 4000 40W Incandescent 1 40 4 0.16 640 Re-Lamp 8W LED A-Lamp 1 8 4 0.03 128 0.13 512 $110 6Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor - Switch Mnt.

1 20.0% 26 $6 $60.00 $190.00 $250.00 $20.00 2.09 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 14.53

4 Sacristy 400 4-Lamp 2x4 T12 Recessed 4 175 1 0.18 70 New Fixture 4-Lamp 2x4 LED 4 48 1 0.05 19 0.13 51 $11 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $150.00 $95.00 $245.00 $50.00 17.85 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

6 Nursery 800 40W Incandescent 1 40 4 0.16 128 Re-Lamp 8W LED A-Lamp 1 8 4 0.03 26 0.13 102 $22 5Dual Technology


1 20.0% 5 $1 $60.00 $190.00 $250.00 $20.00 10.45 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 195.31

5 Nursery Hall 800 4-Lamp 2x4 T8 with EB 4 131 2 0.26 210 Re-LampPhilips LED T8 InstaFit Lamp

(12 W)4 48 2 0.10 77 0.17 133 $29 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $60.00 $95.00 $155.00 $10.00 5.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

4 Cloak Room 300 4-Lamp 2x4 T12 Recessed 4 175 1 0.18 53 New Fixture 4-Lamp 2x4 LED 4 48 1 0.05 14 0.13 38 $8 5Dual Technology


1 20.0% 3 $1 $150.00 $95.00 $245.00 $50.00 23.81 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 347.22

7 Cloak Restroom 300 2-Lamp 2x2 T8 U-Tube 2 68 1 0.07 20 New Fixture 2-Lamp 2x2 LED Fixture 2 24 1 0.02 7 0.04 13 $3 6Dual Technology


1 20.0% 1 $0 $110.00 $95.00 $205.00 $50.00 54.62 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 258.40

3 Storage Closet 300 65W Incandescent 1 65 1 0.07 20 Re-Lamp 12W BR30 LED 1 12 1 0.01 4 0.05 16 $3 6Dual Technology


1 20.0% 1 $0 $20.00 $47.50 $67.50 $5.00 18.28 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 516.80

8Church hanging fixture middle

400 23W CFL 1 23 6 0.14 55 Re-Lamp 11W BR40 LED 1 11 6 0.07 26 0.07 29 $6 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $120.00 $285.00 $405.00 $30.00 60.56 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

9Church hanging fixture middle

400 60W Incandescent 1 60 18 1.08 432 Re-Lamp 12W LED A-Lamp 1 12 18 0.22 86 0.86 346 $74 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $450.00 $855.00 $1,305.00 $90.00 16.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

3Church hanging

fixture right400 65W Incandescent 1 65 3 0.20 78 Re-Lamp 12W BR30 LED 1 12 3 0.04 14 0.16 64 $14 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $60.00 $142.50 $202.50 $15.00 13.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

9 Rectangle in Wall 400 60W Incandescent 1 60 10 0.60 240 Re-Lamp 12W LED A-Lamp 1 12 10 0.12 48 0.48 192 $41 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $250.00 $475.00 $725.00 $50.00 16.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Downlights Canopies 400 75W Incandescent 1 75 10 0.75 300 Re-Lamp 14W PAR38 LED 1 14 10 0.14 56 0.61 244 $52 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $300.00 $475.00 $775.00 $50.00 13.82 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Altar 400 75W Incandescent 1 75 10 0.75 300 Re-Lamp 14W PAR38 LED 1 14 10 0.14 56 0.61 244 $52 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $300.00 $475.00 $775.00 $50.00 13.82 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

9 Entrance 400 60W Incandescent 1 60 2 0.12 48 Re-Lamp 12W LED A-Lamp 1 12 2 0.02 10 0.10 38 $8 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $50.00 $95.00 $145.00 $10.00 16.35 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

11 Main Entrance 4002-Lamp 10W EXIT

Incandescent2 20 1 0.02 8 New Fixture LED Universal Exit Sign 1 2 1 0.00 1 0.02 7 $2 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $35.00 $47.50 $82.50 $10.00 46.83 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

3 Stairwell 400 65W Incandescent 1 65 1 0.07 26 Re-Lamp 12W BR30 LED 1 12 1 0.01 5 0.05 21 $5 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $20.00 $47.50 $67.50 $5.00 13.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

10 Music Room 400 75W Incandescent 1 75 4 0.30 120 Re-Lamp 14W PAR38 LED 1 14 4 0.06 22 0.24 98 $21 5Dual Technology


1 20.0% 4 $1 $120.00 $190.00 $310.00 $20.00 13.82 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 $35.00 223.21

1Music Room

Restroom400 13W CFL 1 13 1 0.01 5 Re-Lamp 8W LED A-Lamp 1 8 1 0.01 3 0.01 2 $0 6

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor - Switch

Mnt.1 20.0% 1 $0 $15.00 $47.50 $62.50 $5.00 133.72 $50.00 $50.00 $100.00 $20.00 581.40

2 Vestry Room 3002-Lamp 6"x8' T12

Fluorescent STD Lamp2 80 2 0.16 48 New Fixture

2-Lamp LED Ceiling-Mounted Wrap Fixture

2 24 2 0.05 14 0.11 34 $7 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $240.00 $190.00 $430.00 $100.00 45.68 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

12 Vestry Room 3002-Lamp 1x4 T8 Ceiling

Wraps2 68 2 0.14 41 Re-Lamp

Philips LED T8 InstaFit Lamp (12 W)

4 48 2 0.10 29 0.04 12 $3 5Dual Technology


1 20.0% 6 $1 $60.00 $95.00 $155.00 $10.00 56.20 $200.00 $50.00 $250.00 FALSE 201.87

8 Exterior 3,000 23W CFL 1 23 3 0.07 207 Re-Lamp 11W BR40 LED 1 11 3 0.03 99 0.04 108 $23 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $60.00 $142.50 $202.50 $15.00 8.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1C15541

St. Paul's Church

LIGHTING CONTROLS COSTRETROFIT ENERGY SAVINGSEXISTING FIXTURES PROPOSED FIXTURE RETROFIT PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS LIGHTING RETROFIT COSTS

Smart Start Incentive

Jersey City, NJ 07304

38 Duncan Avenue

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - St. Paul's Church Page 1 of 2

Fixture Reference #

LocationAverage

Burn HoursDescription

Lamps per Fixture

Watts per Fixture

Qty of Fixtures

Total kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Work Description Equipment DescriptionLamps per

FixtureWatts per

FixtureQty of

FixturesTotal kW

Usage kWh/Yr

Energy Savings, kW

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Control Ref #

Controls DescriptionQty of

ControlsHour

Reduction %

Energy Savings,

kWh

Energy Savings, $

Material Total Labor Total AllRebate

EstimateSimple

PaybackTotal

MaterialsTotal Labor Total All

Simple Payback

LIGHTING CONTROLS COSTRETROFIT ENERGY SAVINGSEXISTING FIXTURES PROPOSED FIXTURE RETROFIT PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS LIGHTING RETROFIT COSTS

Smart Start Incentive

3 Exterior 3000 65W Incandescent 1 65 8 0.52 1,560 Re-Lamp 12W BR30 LED 1 12 8 0.10 288 0.42 1,272 $273 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $160.00 $380.00 $540.00 $40.00 1.83 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Main Entrance 3000 13W CFL 1 13 6 0.08 234 Re-Lamp 8W LED A-Lamp 1 8 6 0.05 144 0.03 90 $19 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $90.00 $285.00 $375.00 $30.00 17.83 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

1 Stairwell 400 13W CFL 1 13 2 0.03 10 Re-Lamp 8W LED A-Lamp 1 8 2 0.02 6 0.01 4 $1 0 No New Controls 0 0.0% 0 $0 $30.00 $95.00 $125.00 $10.00 133.72 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 FALSE -

TOTAL 117 8.08 6,895 117 2.02 1,753 6.06 5,141 $1,105 13 158 $34 $4,535 $6,270 $10,805 $1,265 8.63 $2,000 $650 $2,650 $290.00 69.3

Appendix E - Lighting Audit - St. Paul's Church Page 2 of 2

Documents

S B : C E G C R I P NPaul+Church...from Concord Engineering Group, Inc., 520 S. Burnt Mill Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043. This report may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged