Upload
gabriel-hunt
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Vision to 2030SB 350, De León
• Increases the 33% RPS to 50% RPS• Paves the way for transformation of the
California ISO into a regional organization• Requires integrated resource plans• Requires a study on low-income customers
access and barriers to clean technologies
4
Vision to 2020
• Electricity sector is about 20% below 1990 GHG emission levels• From 2008 to 2013:
– Renewable capacity almost doubled– Coal generation reduced by more than half– GHG emissions reduced by a quarter
5
California Coal Use 1996 - 2026Includes Imports
6
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Coal and Petcoke: Energy (Gigaw
att-H
ours)
Coal
and
Pet
coke
: Sha
re o
f Ene
rgy
Use
d to
Ser
ve C
alifo
rnia
Load
s
Share
Energy
Mojave Closure (EIA Summer
Capacity 1,580 MW)
Temporary loss of Intermountain Unit 1 (EIA Summer Capacity
900 MW)
Intermountain Repowers to Natural Gas. (From EIA Summer Capacity of 1,800 MW
to 1,200 MW Combined Cycle)
Actual Expected
2014
Source Energy Commission staff based on Quarterly Fuels and Energy Report (QFER) [8], 2014 Power Source Disclosure Filings [11], and S-2 Filings [D2].
ESTIMATED GENERATION FROM OPERATING RENEWABLE FACILITIES
Sources: Energy Commission staff using QFER, source [8]; CPUC RPS contract database [D1]; California SO facility interconnections; and POU S-2 and S-5 Forms for 2014 [D2]. QFER collects data 45 days after each calendar quarter for power plants 10 MW and larger and annually for plants from 1-10 MW. Plants under 1 MW are not required to report under QFER. The data depict facilities on-line as of December 30, 2014. Updated June 30, 2015
UTILITY-SCALE RENEWABLES OPERATING IN CALIFORNIA FROM 2010 THROUGH 2014
Source: Energy Commission staff based on sources [1] through [7] listed near the end of this document.
CALIFORNIA SOLAR GENERATION AND CAPACITY ADDITIONS 2007 THROUGH 2014
Figure 4: Renewable Distributed Generation in California (20 MW or Smaller, Includes Wholesale and Self-Generation)
RENEWABLE DISTRIBUTED GENERATION IN CALIFORNIA
CA Leads in New Solar Home Construction
Zero Energy CommunityRocklin, CA
27% of New Homes in Southern CA Being Built
with Solar
14
17
EIM has generated over $21 million in benefits since November 2014
EIM benefits reflect:• More efficient dispatch, both inter- and intra-
regional• Reduced renewable energy curtailment • Reduced flexibility reserves needed in
PacifiCorp BAAs
Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Total
ISO $1.24 $1.45 $2.46 $5.15
PACE $2.31 $2.62 $3.26 $8.19
PACW $2.42 $1.19 $4.46 $8.07
Total $5.97 $5.26 $10.18 * $21.41
2015 Avoided RE Curtailment (MWh)
Q1 8860Q2 3629
Total 12489
Equates to 5,345 metric-tons of CO2
NOTE: Benefits are in millions of dollars* Q2 benefits reflect 5-minute intervals, whereas previous quarters reflected 15-minute intervals
Desert Sunlight Solar Project550 MWRiverside County, CA
The World’s Largest Thin Film Solar PV Project
21
The World’s Largest Solar Thermal Power Plant (Tower)
Ivanpah Solar Thermal Project393 MWSan Bernardino County, CA
24
The World’s Largest Solar Thermal Power Plant (Trough)
Solar Energy Generating System (SEGS)354 MWSan Bernardino County, CA
25
The World’s Largest Iron-Chromium Flow Battery
EnerVault Iron-Chromium Technology 1 MWh capacity at 250 kW (4 hour duration)Turlock, CA
27
29
The Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (RETI 1.0)
Initiated June 2007
• Ease designation of future transmission line corridors• Identify transmission projects • Expedite siting and permitting - transmission line and renewable
generation
30 Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZs) • 80,000 MW potential statewide• ~66,000 MW in California’s Mojave and Colorado Deserts.
30
RETI 1.0 Process• Phase 1 – Identification of CREZs• Phase 2 – Refinement of CREZs• Phase 3 – Work on priority CREZs
• Stakeholder Participation, including:• Transmission Owners/Providers • Renewable Energy Developers• Electric Retail Providers • Federal, State, and Local Government Agencies• Native American Tribal Governments• Landowners• Environmental and public interest organizations• Balancing Authorities and Utility Regulatory Commissions• Other interested parties
31
RETI 1.0 Output Informed…
• Renewable procurement and transmission permitting at the CPUC
• Renewable generation and transmission planning decisions at the POUs
• Renewable permitting and transmission corridor designation at the CEC
• Transmission planning process at the CAISO• Transmission planning for the DRECP
32
California’s Experience Planning the Transmission for Renewable Energy Development
• Collaborative Study Groups for Tehachapi and Imperial Valley
• RETI - The Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative
• CTPG - the California Transmission Planning Group
• DRECP – Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan
• San Joaquin Valley Solar
And now….
• RETI 2.0