Upload
ursula-flynn
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Review: Common Metal Structureshcp ccp (fcc) bcc
ABABABABCABC not close-packed
Features•Filled outer shells spherical atom cores, isotropic bonding•Maximize number of bonds high coordination number•High density
Ionic Bonding & Structures
Which is more stable?
+ –
–
––
–
–
+ –
–
––
–
–
Isotropic bonding; alternate anions and cations
––
–
– –
–+
Just barely stable
http://www.chem.ox.ac.uk/icl/heyes/structure_of_solids/Lecture3/Lec3.html#anchor4
central atom drawn smaller than available space for clarity
Radius Ratio Rules
CN (cation) Geometry min rc/RA
2 none
(linear)
3 0.155
(trigonal planar)
4 0.225
(tetrahedral)
Consider: CN = 6, 8 12
Octahedral Coordination: CN = 6
2RA
rc + RA
2 2A c AR r R
22
2c A
A
r R
R
2 1 0.414c
A
r
R
rc + RA
2RA
a
Cubic Coordination: CN = 8
2RA
2(rc + RA)
2 AR a
3c A
A
r R
R
3 1 0.732c
A
r
R
a
2( ) 3A cR r a
Cuboctahedral: CN = 12
rc + RA = 2RA
rc = RA rc/RA = 1
2RA
rc + RA
CN Geometry min rc/RA
6 0.414
(octahedral)
8 0.732
(cubic)
12 1
(cuboctahedral)
Radius Ratio Rules
CN (cation) Geometry min rc/RA (f)
2 linear none
3 trigonal planar 0.155
4 tetrahedral 0.225
6 octahedral 0.414
8 cubic 0.732
12 cubo-octahedral 1
if rc is smaller than fRA, then the space is too big and the structure is unstable