Upload
chauhanbrothers3423
View
567
Download
9
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
`A Dissertation
0n
Topic: Mulk Raj Anand’s Coolie and Untouchable: A Cultural Study
Submitted to MM Institute of Distance Education
MAHARISHI MARKANDESHWAR UNIVERSITY
For The Award of the Degree of
MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY
IN
ENGLISH
Supervised By: Submitted By:
Mr. Ravi Raj Sunidhi Saini
Lecturer Ref No: A10901337021 Govt.College, Una
MM Institute Of Distance Education ( MMDIE)
Maharishi Markandeshwar University
Mullana (Ambala) Session: (2009-10)
2
Declaration
I, Sunidhi Saini, hereby declare that the Dissertation titled “Mulk raj Anand’s Coolie and
Untouchable: A Cultural study” submitted to the Directorate of Distance Education, Maharishi
Markandeshwar University Mullana, Ambala in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree
of Master of Philosophy in English and that the dissertation has not previously formed the basis
for the award of any other degree, diploma, associate ship, fellowship or other title.
Place: Signature of the candidate
Dated:
3
Acknowledgements
It gives me immense, pleasure to express my sincere and wholehearted gratitude to my
esteemed guide Mr. Ravi Raj for his dexterous guidance, invaluable and untiring help, ever
encouraging attitude and supervision throughout my study. To device benefit of their
enormous experience, it is a matter of great privilege to me.
I offer my heartful appreciation to all my friends for their ever willing cooperation, moral
support and best wishes for successfully taking this study. I wish them very best in their life.
I find no words to acknowledge in so formal manner the sacrifice, love, help and inspiration
rendered by my parents to take up his study.
Last but not least, thanks is also extended to the library staff for their kind help and
encouragement given during the various stages of this study.
All cannot be mentioned but none is forgotten.
Sunidhi Saini
4
Certificate
This is to certify that the dissertation titled Mulk Raj Anand’s Coolie and Untouchable: A
Cultural study” is a bonafide record of independent research work done by Sunidhi Saini (Reg.
No. ______________) under my supervision during 2009, submitted to the Directorate of
Distance Education, Maharishi Markandeshwar University Mullana, Ambala in partial
fulfillment for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy in English and that the
dissertation has not previously formed the basis for the award of any other degree, diploma,
associateship, fellowship or other title.
Place: Signature of the Supervisor
Dated: Mr. Ravi Raj
5
CONTENTS: Page No
Declaration
Acknowledgement
Certificate
Tentative Chapterization
Chapter 1: Introduction 6 - 19
Chapter 2: Mulk Raj Anand As a Novelist
Chapter 3: Cultural Aspects in Coolie And Untouchable
Chapter 4: Comparison with other works of Same Genre
Chapter 5: Conclusion
Selected Bibliography
6
Anand’s Coolie & Untouchable: A Cultural Study
Chapter 1: Introduction
India has produced several great writers who have influenced a whole Generation and continue
to inspire the coming generations by their writings. Their words vividly portray the picture of
Indian society and subtly brings out the Ills in it. Indian writers Like Prem Chand, Rabindranath
Tagore. Arundhati Roy, Mulk Raj Anand, Raja Rao, Salman Rushdie Etc. Have played a
progressive part In the reform of Indian society. Before discussing the term English Indian
Literature let us first of all see what does the word literature actually means? And what is its
role? A piece of literature is a social document because it is writtern by a human being who is in
a variety of relationships. It is writtern by keeping audience in mind and is analyzed by its
readers and the writer always has a social message as the part of his ideology and world view.
The Writer’s writings are his reactions to challenges he faces. A piece of literature is not just a
social document but it is a social force. Charles Dickens novel “David Copperfield” forced to
change poor laws in England. A piece of work as said by Hemingway, should be like an iceberg
only one-eighth part is visible. Now the term English Indian Literature (IEL) refers to the body
of work of writers in India who write in the English Language and whose native and co-native
language could be one of the numerous languages of India. It is also associated with the work of
members of Indian Diaspora (non resident Indian). It is frequently referred to as Indo-Anglian
Literature and this term should not be confused with Anglo-Indian Literature. The term “Indo-
Anglian” is used to denote the original literary creation in the English language by Indians. On
the other hand the term “Anglo-Indian Literature” is used to denote the writing of Englishmen
7
in English about India and Indian life.
Anand’s Coolie & Untouchable: A Cultural Study
Mulk Raj Anand belongs to former that is Indo-Anglian Literature. Today there are
large number of educated Indians Who use the English language as a medium of the creative
exploration and expression of their experience of life and Mulk Raj Anand is among one of
them. Writings of these writers has now developed into substancial body of literature in its own
right and it is this substancial body of literature which is referred as Indo-Anglian Literature. As
C.R Reddy in his foreword to Srinivasa Iyengar’s work Indo-Anglian Literature points out, “Indo-
Anglian Literature is not essentially different in kind from Indian Literature. It is part of it, a
modern facet of that glory which, commencing from the Vedas, has continued to spread its
mellow light, now with greater and now with less brilliance under the inexorable vicissitudes of
time and history ever increasingly up to the present time of Tagore, Iqbal and Aurobindo
Ghosh, And bids fair to expand with our, as well as humanity’s expanding future.” Indian writing
in English has coruscated World wide and English works of Indian authors have been highly
appreciated even by people of English speaking nations. The story of the Indian novel is really the story of changing India. There was
time when education was a rare opportunity and speaking English was unnecessary. The
stories were already there- in the myths, in the folklore and the umpteen languages and
cultures that gossiped, conversed, laughed and cried all over the subcontinent. With the coming
of Mulk Raj Anand, Raja Rao and R.K Narayan, the Indian English novel had begun its journey.
Anand appeared in Indian Literary movement in 1930s. That was a time of revolution and
8
reformation not in India but for whole world. India was under the grip of rigid social
Anand’s Coolie & Untouchable: A Cultural Study
conventions like caste system, child marriage, Sati system and various superstitious beliefs. The
political conditions, too, were against Indian ethos. As struggle for freedom was going on in
India under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi. Satyagraha, Non-cooperation and call for
empowerment of Down-trodden paved its ways to Literary Movement where writers started to
write and started to speak for the lower castes and neglected people in the society. So the
beginning of twentieth century witnessed the emergence of great Leaders in India and the
world. Marx, Hitler nourished the agitated minds and soothed them with their messages.
Writers soothed the people with their inspirational and motivational writings. Their speeches,
writings, Messages create a consciousness among the people. Mulk Raj Anand An Indian
decided to take writing as a profession. He rose to prominence with his maiden novel
Untouchable (1935). In Coolie Mulk Raj Anand, the social disparity in India is laid bare. In R.K
Narayan’s imaginary village Malgudi, the invisible men and women of our teeming population
come to life and act out life with all its perversities and whimsicalities. In Kanthapura by Raja
Rao Gandhism awakes in a sleepy village down south. India no longer needed to be depicted by
outsiders. Anand choose the English language as an effective medium to express
the Indian Society and life of Indian people. Works Of Anand are more of a study of a
Particular society at a particular time. There are only few studies that study this aspect of
Anand’s writings. We can say that Anand as a writer of social protest, as a writer of poor, as a
9
writer of ignored and suppressed class of the society or to sum up we can say that Anand as a
Anand’s Coolie & Untouchable: A Cultural Study
writer of Real India. Different sections of society have different problems but the fact is this
that nobody pay attention to the problems being faced by the lower class just because they are
of low caste, poor, illiterate. So Anand decided to do write something in which he can describe
the problems of these low, neglected class of the society . The first book writtern by an Indian in English was by Sake Dean Mahomet, titled
“Travels Of Dean Mahomet.” Early Indian writers used English unadulterated by Indian words to
Convey an experience which was essentially Indian. Raja Rao’s Kanthapura is Indian in terms of
its storytelling qualities. Rabindranath Tagore used to write in Bengali and English and was
responsible for the translations of his own works into English. R. K Narayan was the writer who
contributed over many decades and who continued to write till his death. Simultaneous with
Narayan’s pastoral idylls, A very different writer, Mulk Raj Anand was similarly gaining
recognition for his writing set in rural India, But his stories were harsher, and engaged,
sometimes brutually, with divisions of caste, class and religion. The major themes of Anand’s
writings includes his empathy with the suppressed class. He portrays them as they are.
Through his writings he wants to fight for against exploitation of man by man.The above
discussion clearly establishes Indo-Anglian writing as a separate genre, as distuinguished from
Anglo-Indian writing. This way of writing has been enriched by such internationally recognized
figures as Toru Dutt, Sarojini Naidu, Tagore, Jawahar Lal Nehru, Aurbindo Ghosh and Mahatma
Gandhi. Today This Tradition of Writing has been followed by number of eminent writers such
10
as Mulk Raj Anand , R.K Narayan,Raja Rao and Indo-Anglain Liiterature continues to flourish and
Anand’s Coolie & Untouchable: A Cultural Study
grow and attain higher and higher peaks of excellence. Braj’B Kachru remarks :
“ Indian English fiction is now being studied and discussed in the entire English speaking world
by those interested in the Indian sub-continent or in non-native englishes, and by linguists for
its thematic and stylistic Indianness. At least half a dozen Indian novelists have created a small
but slowly increasing international reading public for themselves, e.g, Mulk Raj Anand, Anita
Desai, Kamala Markandaya, R.K Narayan, Raja Rao, Khushwant Singh and Nayantra Sehgal”.
And this international attention to these Indian writers is due to their Indianness reflected in
their works in different ways including themes, images, myths and symbols. Typical Indian
themes are said to be thei caste system, social attitudes, social and religious taboos,
superstitious, nations of superiority and inferiority, portrayal of poverty, hunger and disease,
portrayal of widespread social evils and tensions; examinations of the survivals of the past,
exploration of hybrid culture of the dislocations and conflicts in a tradition ridden society under
the impact of an incipient, half hearted industrialization. Some other themes of novel in English
are inter-racial relations, the Indian National Movement and struggle for freedom ( in Raja
Rao’s Kantapura, Tamas by Bhisham Sahni), Partition of India and death, destruction and
suffering caused by it ( Train To Pakistan), depiction of poverty and hunger of Indians ( Bhabani
Bhattacharya’s, So Many hungers), Indian rural life , conflict between tradition and modernity
( Anand’s Untouchable) etc. continue to engage the attention of the novelists. The theme of
confrontation of east and west has been successfully dealt by Raja Rao, Kamla Markandaya and
11
many others. The theme of rootlessness, loneliness, the exploration of psyche and the inner
Anand’s Coolie & Untouchable: A Cultural Study
man have been dealt by Anita Desai.
However it would be interesting to see how these dominant themes and myths are used in
Indian English novels as part of our literary heritage. No doubt these writers have achieved
success despite the overwhelming difficulties which the Indian writers have always faced, and
which they continue to face even today. It is the medium of expression. As Raja Rao in his
preface to novel “Kanthapura” says, English is not a foreign tongue in India, but it is only the
language of oue intellectual make-up, not of our emotional make-up. He rightly suggests that
Indian writer in English must express “Indian Sensibilty” and with this end in view he should
learn to write “Indian English” and not Babu English. In Kanthpura novelist doesn’t write, “Babu
English” but Indian English , an English eminently suited for the expression of Indian (or
peasant) sensibility. He has tried to adapt his English style to the movement of Sanskrit
sentence. His styles has the flavor of Kannada speech, and its rhythm are almost incantatory,
the rtythms of Sanskrit, a language which is the source of Indian languages. The evolution of the
suitable style for the expression of Indian sensibility is Raja Rao’s most significant contribution
to the Indo-Anglian fiction. Another of his contribution is the fusion of a western Art form with
an Indian theme and the Indian way of treating it. He has followed the oral Indian tradition of
story-telling. As a old narrator’s stream of reminiscence proceeds, there is a free mingling of
fact and fiction, poetry and reality, the perennial and the present, and this makes Kanthapura
“a distinctive novel almost a new species of fiction”. The use of the Eliotian mythical technique
12
enables the novelist to exalt Gandhi as Rama, to see Bharat Mata as Sita, and the Red man as
Ravan. This mingling of the Gods and the men, of myth and legend with contemporary reality, is
true to the Indian tradition of story telling. “The Indianness of English consists not in
the sprinkling of Indian vocabulary, though it is there, but in the manner in which they dislocate
the conventional syntax to approxiamate to the patterns and rhytms of Punjabi, Kannada or
Tamil speech in the attempt to catch the very tone of voice, the gesture of hand and the
twinkle in the eye of man and woman who figure in the work of art”. Such Indian English must
be used to express Indian sensibility, i.e, to convey the feel of the cultural and emotional life of
the people to the readers. This is certainly a difficult task but there are number of eminent
writers who have overcome these difficulties posed by the medium of expression, and achieved
international name and fame. Mulk raj Anand is one of them. Because language is a very
important aspect when you are going to study the cultural aspects of a particular society. And
language is the only medium through which we can get deep insight in to their lives.
In the Pre-Independent India People were discriminated on the basis of their caste , color,
religion ,creed etc. With the help of their works Anand Brings to light the particular culture of
the pre independent India and the miseries of the lower class at that time. Lower class was
discriminated to the fullest in the pre-independence India because we were under the British
Rule and Britishers were ruling on us and along with their Racial discrimination was also there.
This study will Study how Anand expressed the feelings of the people who are being oppressed
by the society especially by the upper class and social concern of Anand for the lower class.
Now if we see, One cannot find adequate semantic definition of the term culture.
Every people seems to understand something different about this word in light of their
13
traditions, habits of mind and experience. We will discuss the relevance and applicability in
accordance and context of India. Culture word is derived from latin word “Colere” that means
to cultivate. In other words we can define culture as “An integrated Pattern of human
knowledge, belief, and behaviour that depends upon capacity for symbolic thought and
learning” English poet and Essayist Mathew Arnold used word “culture” to refer to an ideal of
individual human refinement of “ best that has been thought and said in the world ” (Mathew
Arnold 1869 Culture and Anarchy). Culture thus consists of language, ideas, beliefs, customs,
taboos, codes, rituals, ceremonies and symbols. It has played a crucial role in human evolution.
History of culture is the history of man. The stream of culture undergoes changes of content as
well as of form as it flows. Old elements are dropped and new elements are added. Ideas are
the real foundation of the culture. Benedict Anderson’s remarks about the importance Nation’s
culture is true:
“ Nationalism has to be understood by aligning it not with self-consciously held political
ideologies, but with large cultural systems that preceded it, out of which—as well as against
which----it came into being.”
Literature coming from bilingual cultures demonstrates how the tension or interaction between
different cultures, languages and systems can be utilized for narrative purposes.Every society
has its own particular culture, socio cultural system. An individual’s attitude, values, ideals and
beliefs are greatly influenced by culture in which he or she lives and cultural change takes place
as a result of ecological socio-economic, political, religious or other fundamental factors
affecting a society. Culture revealed itself as a construction, an ever evolving phenomenon,
with in a geographical position that bloomed with constant interaction with in a community;
14
though a reversal in its growth is always possible. In the process of making, remaking and un-
making culture, the distinctive, and sometimes the merging strands residual forces, evolving
forces and emerging forces are palapable. Perhaps the most significant aspect of culture is the
fact of its being controlled by the elite class that, infact, paves the way for the rise of popular
culture which, it was established, is a kind of a revenge of the repressed. As we will see in the
Untouchable and Coolie, it was the elite class and the class holding higher ranks that dominated
the lower class and low caste and eventually it became the culture to exploit them as much as
we can. Robert William in his book ‘Culture And Society’ said that culture is ordinary, i.e,
everything in our surrounding is a part of culture, e.g, history, cooking, dressing etc. There is
another fact that culture is political due to that the ruling class is trying to capture society with
the help of media. Some distinctions were attempted to be drawn between mass culture and
popular culture, which are definitely blurred at any given time. Literature , which is reflection of
and a part of (elite) culture, also absorbs the influences of mass and popular culture through
what is called “carnivilization” Bakhtin.
Most of the Indian writers endeavoured to sustain their
natives ethos by their own creative writings. After a second world war, most of the countries
became conscious to promote their native culture in literary writing. If we talk about the
cultural studies, as it is practiced today, speaks in multiple voices and is also represented and
mediated in multiple voices. Plurality and Polyphony are its greatest assests. It deals with the
critical questions of power, history and politics. For example who controls and owns cultural
productions and why; what are the distribution mechanisms for the cultural products and how
these function in the society; and finally what kind of shaping influence do these principles of
15
control and ownership have on the materiality of the cultural landscape.
The basic assumption of Cultural studies anywhere in the world is that culture is not something
given or already made, but always in the state of making or becoming. In other words, it
perceives culture as something that doesn’t carry the burden of the historical past, but forever
lives in the present moment, which is contingent, continuous and eternally changing and
evolving. Cultural studies is a way of theorizing about this present moment, a way of capturing
its eternal restlessness in intelligible terms. And what does it focus on? Cultural Studies
invariably turns to the “everydayness of our lives”. It deals with the clothes we wear, the food
we eat, the music we listen to, the films and television programs we watch, in short the goods,
the objects, images and text we consume in our day to day lives. It is the way of understanding
why we ‘do’ what we do and also why we ‘become’ what we do and beyond that, why we are
always in a state of “becoming” without ever being ‘made’ fully. As we are going to study
cultural aspects in the novels of Anand and others, so it is important to study each and every
thing associated with it minultely. Both the novels of Anand “Coolie” And “ Untouchable ” are pre- independence
novels and depicting the clear picture of the society or we can say that depicting “ Truth And
Nothing Else Than Truth.” Untouchable and Coolie are pre independence novels and Anand
through his novels tried to depict the clear picture that what was the particular culture of that
time how people Especially low caste people were exploited by the Britishers as India was
under their rule. Britishers exploited us in every way mentally, physically and economically.
These two novels of Anand throw the light on cultural aspects of the pre-independent India.
Now if we go back to the pre_independent India India caste system was
16
deeply deeprooted. Now what the Caste system exactly was on the basis of which people were
discriminated. It was basically a construct, product of imperial policies. Caste in Old India was
co-operative and cultural principle. Roles were divided and followed more as an organized
society rather than anything based on ability or birth. Various caste based theories, social
customs were there on the basis of which people were discriminated and this system has
adverse effects in Indian society. Religion especially Hinduism played an influential role in
shaping the economic activities. The caste system restricted people from changing one’s
occupation and aspiring to an uppercaste’s lifestyle. Thus a barber could not become goldsmith
and even a highly skilled carpenter could not aspire to the lifestyle or privileges enjoyed by a
kshatriya (person of a warrior class). The barrier of mobility on labour restricted economic
prosperity to a few castes. This caste system exists between extremes of the very high and low
castes almost in every community. Word caste comes from Portuguese word ‘Casta’ ( breed or
race). The Sanskrit word applied to the grouping ‘Varna’ which often interpreted the color. As
per Mahabharta if different colors indicate different castes hen all castes are mixed castes. The
Hindus also believe that the ‘Varna’ of a man is determined by his profession and deeds and not
by his birth. Traditionally the political powers lay with Chatriyas. Brahmins were custodian of
Dharma. The Vaishya were given trade of economy whereas Shudras were service
providers.Caste was very rigid in India.Low castes have no right to education. Untouchables
were not allowed to school.So one cause of degeneration of Sanskrit language is untouchability
and perhaps this is why Mahatma Gandhi and Ambedkar, R.N Tagore and Swami Vivekanand,
Maharishi Dayanand and Bal Gangadhar Tilak---all have given a scathing attack on the caste
mentality of India. Mahatma Gandhi even went to the extent of calling the untouchable, “
17
Harijan” that is the man of God. Truly speaking the caste division mentioned in the “Vedas” and
in Srimad Bhagwad Gita, is a division based on the natural constitution of the man arriving from
the dominance of Sattva, Rajas and Tamas. So the purpose of these lines was not to create
breaches among various castes but to run the society easily and smoothly. The fault of casteism
arose through misinterpretation of our scriptures. S. Radhakrishnan rightly holds the view:
“ The institution of caste illustrates the spirit of comprehensive synthesis characteristic of the
Hindu and with its faith in the collaboration of races and the co-operation of the cultures.
Paradoxical as it may seem, the system of caste is the outcome, of tolerance and trust. Though
it has now degenerated into an instrument of oppression and intolerance, though it tends to
perpetuate inequality and develop the spirit exclusiveness, these unfortunate effects are not
the central motives of the system”.
The caste didn’t constitutes a rigid description of occupation and the social status but the
Britishers attempted to equate the Indian caste system to their own colonial caste system since
the British society was divided into caste. Britishers further codified the caste system in India
and made it more rigid. Anand witness this caste culture that was prevalent in pre-independent
society and noticed that outcastes, untouchables were discriminated and tortured to its
maximum.
As he was against Britishers and an Indian by Heart he decided to depict the conditions of
this class in his writings so he does in his novels as Coolie and Untouchable. One og the prime
concerns of a great author is to highlight the cause of the dumb and the deserted, the lowly and
the lost. The author also brings to light the snobbery, hypocricy of the aristocratic people, who
sometimes stoop low to achieve the end. A writer, the prince of the pen is the voice or mouth
18
piece of the millions of people especially of the untouchables and people who are easy to
attack physically and emotionally, who are victims of tyranny and injustice. And this is what
Mulk Raj Anand did to present the deplorable description of the destitutes. The main aim of
carrying this research is to see Anand’s concern and to study the culture of pre-independent
India by diving deep into the early two novels of Anand i.e Untouchable and Coolie. Anand
himself observes:
“All these heroes as the other men and women who had emerged in my novels….were dear to
me because they were the reflections of the real people I had known during my childhood and
youth. And I was only repaying the dept of gratitude I owed them for much of the inspiration----
they had given me to mature inti manhood, when I began to interpret their lives in my writings.
They were not mere phantoms.they were the flesh of my flesh and blood, of my blood, and
obsessed me in the way, in which certain human beings obsess’s an artist’s soul. And I was
doing no more than what a writer does when he sees to interpret the truth from the realities of
his life.”
References:
1. Anand Apology For Heroism: A Brief Autobiography Of Ideas, Kutub-Popular, 1946 (P. 53-54)
2. Dr. Raghukul Tilak, Raja Rao’s Kanthapura, Rama Brothers India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.
3. M.K Bhatnagar, Indian Writing In English (Vol. 1 to 5), Atlantic Publishers and Distributers.
4. A. Sudhakar Rao, Socio-Cultural Aspects in Selected Novels of Raja Rao, Atlantic Publishers and Distributers, 1999.
19
5. Neena Arora, The Novels of Mulk Raj Anand: A Study of His Hero, Atlantic Publishers and Distributers.
6. Raja Rao, 1974, “Preface” Kanthapura, London, Oxford University Press.
7. Braj Kachru (1983), The Indianisation of English: The English in India, Delhi: oup.
8. Benedict Anderson (1983), Imagined Communities, London, Uerso and New Left Books.
9. S. Radhakrishnan, Hindu View Of Life, London, George Allen and Unwin, 1954.
20
Anand’s Coolie & Untouchable: A Cultural Study
Chapter 2: Mulk Raj Anand As a Novelist
In this chapter we will study different aspects of the Anand’s personality and
Anand as a Novelist. As present study is particularly discussing Anand’s as a
writer of social protest, his concern for the neglected class it is essential to
discuss about his life and his works also. Along with R.K Narayan and Raja Rao,
Anand is credited with establishing the basic forms of modern and Indian
Literature writtern in English. He is the doyen of Indian English fiction, whose
writing career spanned nearly four decades, has carved out a permanent niche
in the literay world. His writings are marked by his fine perception of the Indian
ethos, the sinister forces that operates in the an Indian society, his humanitarian
outlook and profound sympathy for the down trodden and unprivileged. As an
author once told “ I believe in the only ism possible in our age ----humanism.
I feel that a man can grow in to the highest consciousness from insights into the
nature of human experience derived through creative art and literature. The
piling up of these insights May make a man survive at some level or quality of
]life, in our tragic age. I believe in co-existence among human beings and
co-discovery of cultures. I believe that world must end the arms race and get
five percent disarmament to give resources for building basic plenty throughout
the world……….i believe, though man has fallen very low at various times in
history, he is not so bad that he will not survive on this planet---as long as the
21
earth does not grow cold. I always dream the earth is not flat, but round.
Anand’s novels are thus faithful transcripts of and serious comments on the
contemporary social reality. The novels of Anand provide insight and throws a
light on old classics. Novels like Untouchable, Coolie, Two Leaves And Bud and
The Woman And The Cow but also deals with the issues like despair and
delight. Mulk Raj Anand is an established novelist who deals in common to day-
today themes in Indian villages and towns, makes it to the skyscrapers of cities
enabling us to realize the chasm between two worlds. Starting his quest as a
novelist with Untouchable he gets strength to strengthen his characters from
from furnance of the fight for freedom. His simple character smoulder with in
and keep the furnance burning till the fight comes to flames. A comparative
observation of his characters between the first phase and later phase makes
our vision clear. An overall study of His novels proves the fact that most of his
works have taken birth in ‘Despair’ and ‘Delight’. If we see life also moves on
wheels of ‘Despair’ and ‘Delight’. His personal story can be viewed as a story of
torments and ecstasies. Symbolic facts of his life someway or the other related to
his is related to his fictional impetous. At the core of his writings is a humanist
philosophy that incorporates elements of socialist, political and economic
theory. Critics argue that his socially conscious works have shed keen insights on
Indian affairs and enriched his country’s literary heritage. Indian novelist Mulk Raj
Anand passéd away at the grand old age of 98. He was arguably the greatest
22
exponent of Indian writing whose literary output was infused with political
commitment that portrayed the lives of India’s poor and downtrodden people
in a realistic and sympathetic manner. He is one of the highly regarded Indian
Novelists Writing In English. He is a short story writer, and art critic writing in English.
He was among the first to render Punjabi and Hindustani idioms into English
called the zola or Balzac of India. Anand drew a realistic and sympathetic
portrait of the poor of his country. One reason for the reflection of political issues
of the independence movement in his writings because he himself had been
involved in India’s freedom movement. Along with his contemporaries
magnificient Raja Rao and R.K Narayan he has been regarded as one of the
‘founding fathers’ of the India’s literary movement in 1930s and of the English
novel. “And he had soon become possessed with an overwhelming desire to
live their life. He had been told they were sahibs, superior people. He had felt
that to put on their clothes made one sahib too. So he tried to copy them as
well as he could in the exigencies of his peculiarly Indian circumstances.”( From
Untouchable, 1935). Anand belonged to a generation that did not worship
money or media hype. For him writing was nothing short of expressing his social
concern and genuinely believing that he was playing an important part in
purging society of its ills. Anand was born at the time when socio-cultural ethos
of India was infested with narrow casteism. Mulk with a masterful artistry etched
out the cultural and social tribulations and the predicament of deprived
belonging to the lower caste according to the social niche. The contemporary
23
social problems, like discriminations on the basis of caste and religion and the
immediate outcome of this discrimination, untouchability are presented boldly
his novels. The characters in his novels are always from the common run of men,
from dust and dirt mean to say that from class who is always suppressed and
who are the part and parcel of the main stream society. Suppression and
oppression of common people by Britishers have developed the hatred of
novelist towards Britishers. The heroes of his novels are blessed with certain
admirable qualities of head and heart but social forces hamper the proper
development of these qualities. The hard working nature, intelligence, sensitivity
are so beautifully suppressed. They just bear and face the tortures of these
practices but the reaction is limited because they belong to the lower class who
can not speak for their rights and who cannot raise their voice. Their helplessness
against the suppression and social set up, traditions, taboos and customs gives
him a acute pain. They can do nothing but accept their fate. So the novels of
Anand, at this period of time took a bold and fearless plunge picking his heroes
from soil and dust. He decided to paint real India in its real colours and stark
reality. Real India he felt could be found amidst untouchables, coolies,
labourers, exploited wives etc. He introduced these victims of society as heroes
or main character in his novels because according to Walter Allen “ It is only
through his characters that a novelist succced in whatis his main social function,
which is to awaken…………..sympathetic comprehension in our readers.”
Anand’s motive behind picking his protagonist from the lower strata of society is
24
to prepare the people for revolution against suppression, Injustice and exploitation. Extremely of its time, novels of Mulk Raj Anand Reflects the socio-political and
cultural forte of the era. Mulk Raj Anand was born on December 1905 in to a family of metal
workers with an army backround in Peshawar, India (now in Pakistan). He was son of
coppersmith and graduated with honours in 1924 from Punjab University Lahore and at
University College at London. Anand began his formal education at a time when the Indian
educational system emphasized proficiency in English. Anad has since criticized the education
he received in Indian primary and secondary schools and at the university of Punjab for
neglecting Indian and European culture and leavind students ill-prepared foe adult life .He was
truly an Indian Author. He witnessed the bloody reality of colonial rule with the Jaillinwala
massacre of Amritsar in 1919. Like most Indians of his generation he was highly influenced by
Gandhi ji and he threw himself into Gandhi’s non-cooperation movement. He received 11
stripes on his back and was briefly jailed. This experience had a great impact on him. “ I had
grown up in the ferment of a great moral and political movement in which I had learnt that
alien authority constricted our lives in everyway. I can’t say there was no bitterness, my hatred
of imperialism because I remember how oftenwaves of fury swept over me to see hundreds of
human beings go to jail after being beaten up by the police for offering civil disobedience.”
These words of Anand clearly shows his anger towards British rule and thats why Anand
protested his father’s servility to British authorities. As his first text was born out of family
tragedy, instigated by rigidity of caste system. His first prose essay was a response to the
suicide of an aunt, who had been excommunicated by his family for dining with the Muslim
woman. Inevitably Anand who spent half his life time in London and half in India he was drawn
25
towards the Independence movement in India. An unhappy love for a Muslim girl, who was
married, inspired some of his poetry. Anand attended Khalsa college, Amritsar and entered the
university of Punjab in 1921. There after Anand did his additional studies at Cambridge and at
London University receiving his Ph.D in 1929. He studied and later lectured at League of Nations
School of Intellectual cooperation in Geneva. Between 1932 and 1945 Anand lectured on and
off, at Workers Educational Association in London. In the 1930s and 1940s, as he was deeply
influenced by Gandhi ji Anand divided his time between literary London and Gandhi’s India. He
joined the struggle for Independence, but at the same time he also fought with republicans in
Spanish Civil War 2 and supported freedom elsewhere around the globe. He worked as a
broadcaster and scriptwriter in the film division of BBC in London. After the war Anand
returned permanently to India, making his hometown and center of activity. In 1946 he
founded the fine arts magazine Marg. He also became a director of Kutub Publishers. From
1948 to 1946 Anand taught in Indian universities. In 1960s he was Tagore Professor of
Literature and Fine arts at the university of Punjab and visiting professor at Institute Of
Advanced Studies in Shimla. Between the years 1965 and 1970 Anand was fine arts chairman at
Lalit Kala Academy ( National Academy of Arts). In 1970 he was appointed as a president of
Lokayata trust, for creating a community and cultural center in the village of Haus Khas, New
Delhi. Anand started to write at an early age. Although Punjabi and Hindustani Were his
mother tongues, he wrote in English, because English language publishers did not reject his
books due to his themes. His career as a writer began in England by publishing short notes on
books in T.S Eliot’s magazine “Criterion”. His acquaintances from his times included such
26
authors as E.M Foster, Herbert Read, Henry Miller and George Orwell. But the most important influence upon Anand was Gandhi ji’s, who shaped his social conscience. In the early 1930s
Anand focoused on books on art history. His works includes poetry and essay on a wide range
of subjects, as well as autobiographies and novels. Prominent among his novels are “The Village
(1939)” , “Across The Black Waters (1940)” , “Sword and Sickle “ all writtern in England perhaps
most important of his works writtern In India and two of those includes Untouchable (1935)
and Coolie (1936) from where Anand gained a world wide recognition. His personal experiences
and the reform of India’s political, social and cultural institutions are major elements in Anand’s
writings. Untouchable was inspired by author’s childhood memory of low caste sweeper boy
Bakha who carried him home after he had been injured, the boy was however beaten by
Anand’s mother for touching her higher caste son. Bakha searches for comfort to the tragedy of
the destiny into which he was born, talking first with a Christian missionary and then with a
follower of Mahatma Gandhi but by the end of the book he concludes that it is technology in
the form of newly introduced flush toilet that will be his savior, while the toilet may deprive
him and his family of the traditional livelihood they have had for centuries, it may also literate
them in the end by eliminating the need for a caste of toilet cleaners. Problem of
untouchablility that was Prevalent in India before independence is discussed and brought to
light in his this famous novel Untouchable, through the life history of 18 year old, Bakha an
unclean outcaste who suffers a number of humiliations in the course of his day. The touching
occurs in the morning and subsequently shadows the rest of the day. Only due to his low birth
he has to work as a latrine sweeper. The powerful critique of Indian caste system suggested
that British colonial domination of India has actually increased the problems of outcastes such
as Bakha. After 19 rejection slips Anand’s novel was published in England with a preface by E.M
27
Forster : “ Untouchable could have only writtern by an Indian who observed from the outside.
No European, however sympathetic, could have created the character of Bakha because he
would not have known about his troubles. And no untouchable could have writtern the book,
because he would have been involved in indignation and self pity”. His friend E.M Forster,
whom he met while working on T.s Eliot’s magazine, wrote the introduction. In his second novel
Coolie (1936) Anand continues to describe the plight of India’s poor by telling a story of 15
year old trapped in servitude as a child labourer who eventually dies of tuberclosis.In reality
both Books were a revelation to the readers unaware of the circumstances of life in a caste
society and sparked extensive critical debate. This simple book which captured the puissance of
the Punjabi and Hindi, idiom in English was widely acclaimed and Anand won reputation of
being India’s Charles Dickens. He was very much concerned about the ignorant class of the
society and his this interest in social themes continued in the Coolie which relate the
tribulations of the working class life in India. Critics assert that in his early works Anand
employed markedly polemical style when attributing India’s social problems to caste system,
British Rule and Capitalism. Mulk Raj Anand’s personal experiences and the reform of India’s
political, social and cultural institutions are major elements in Anand’s writings. Early fictional
works like Untouchable, “Two Leaves And Bud” and “Coolie” dramatize the cruelties inherit in
the caste system and suffering induced by poverty. In His third novel “Two Leaves And A Bud”
(1937) Anand expresses concern for the tears and sighs of the crushed humainity which
culminates in a tragic clash between the poor and the rich, Britishers and the Indians and
above all, proletariat and the Bourgeoisie. This novel described the story of an exploited
28
peasant Gangu of Hoshairpur in Punjab is tempted by a false promises and fettered and
oppressed by the colonial people in the Macpherson Tea Estate in distant Assam. His wife,
Sajani, and his children, Leila and Buddhu also bear the brunt of colonial exploitation. Here
Gangu and other coolies are mercilessly treated even worse than animals. Gangu is killed while
trying to protect his daughter from being raped by a British colonial official. His after works
including the novel Private Life Of An Indian Prince, was more of a autobiographical in nature
and in 1950 Anand embarked on a project seven part autobiography with seven summers, one
part Morning Face (1968) won him the National Academy Award. Confession Of A Lover(1972)
and The Bubble (1988), reveal the story of his experiments with the truth and the struggle of his
various egos to attain a possible higher self. Anand also published books on subjects as diverse
as Marx and Engels in India, Tagore, Nehru, Aesop’s fables, the Kama Sutra, erotic sculpture and
Indian Ivories. Along with the novelist and short story writer Munshi Prem Chand ( 1880-1936),
Anand was involved in forming dalit literature, used to refer to the “untouchable” casteless
sects of India. Like much of his later work it contains elements of his spiritual journey as he
struggles to attain a higher sense of self awareness.
Jaydeep Sarangi sums up what Indian ness in General represents, it is an internal and abstract
value. “ Indian ness is essentially an important criteria for Indian writing in English because it
gives the Indian writing an identity of its own” ( P-71). A prolific Writer first gained world wide recognition for his novels Untouchable and
Coolie both of which examined problem of poverty in Indian society. Among his other works are
The Village (1939), The Sword And The Sickle (1942) and The Big Heart. Anand is a prolific
writer and has written a large number of Extremely varied short stories. They reveal his gift if
humor and deal in a lighter vain with the problems that engage him in his novel- exploitation o
29
the poor, Industrialization colonialism and race relations. One of Anand’s best novels “ The Big
Heart” deals with a traditional coppersmith who eel threatened by mechanization. The large
hearted Anand tries to weld them in to a trade union: he tells it is not the machines but the
owners who exploit them, but he dies in a scuffle before his ideals can be realized. The Old Man
Cow is republished as Gauri) takes up plight of another unprivileged section of society-women.
The heroine, Gauri, is sold to an old money lender by her own mother out of economic
necessity. Gauri re-enacts the Ramayana myth of Sita by staying for some time in the house o
the old banker, just as Sita to stay with Ravana. Gauri is reunited with her husband Panchi just
as Sita was reunited with Rama, and panchi rejects her later, just as Rama rejected the pregnant
Sita because o social pressures. At this point Anand gives a new turn to the old myth Unlike Sita
who bore her suffering meekly, Gauri rejects her cowardly husband and goes on a build a new
life for herself. The story is well conceived and the use of the myth original, but the writing is
hurried and slipshod, the harangues on social justice not organic to the plot. Anand through his
rare prolificacy, bold experimentation and aesthetic sensibility, has made immense contribution
to the Indian as well as world literature in world. He is one of the best known novelist in English in India. Now we
are going to read some lines what Anand said about his works and life that will
clear up the hidden aspects of his personality that what actually encourages
him to write. “ I began to write early- a kind of free verse in the Punjabi and urdu
languages, from the compulsion of the shock of the death of my cousin when
she was nine years old. I wrote a letter to God telling him he didn’t exist. Later
going through the dark night of bereavement, when my aunt committed suicide
30
because she was excommunicated for interdining with a Muslim woman, I wrote
an elegy. Again when I fell in love with a young muslim girl, who was married off
by arrangement, I wrote love verse. The poet philosopher Muhammad Iqbal,
introduced me to the problems of individual through his long poem “ Secrets Of
The Self.’’ Through him I also read Nietzsche to confirm my rejection of God.”
Anand spent a short term in jail also under freedom movement that was going
on at that time,he was punished by his parents for affliations with Gandhi
movement as his father was pro-british. Anand went to Europe and there he
studied various philosophical system and still he was disappointed and found
that these comprehensive philosophies didn’t answer life’s problems. He also
joined Marxist study circle after he was beaten in coal miner’s strike. After that
Anand became familiar with Trade unionist Alan Hutt, Palme Dutt, John
Strachey, T. S. Eliot, Herbert Read, Bonamy Dobree, Harold Laski and Leonard
woolf. It was during this time that Anand fell in love with a young Welsh girl
painter, Irene, whose father was a biologist. For her he wrote a long confession
about the braek up of his family, The British impact on his life. Then Anand
began to write short stories allegories and novels as nobody would publish
narrative. His first attempt at a novel was revised in Gandhi’s Sabarmati Ashram
in Ahmedabad, But was turned down by 19 Publishers in London.
Since the publication of his first novel, Anand wrote continuously on
the human situation in the lives of people who are rejected in the society,
outcastes, peasants, farmers and other eccentrics, thrown up during the
31
transition from the ancient orthodox Indian society to the self conscious modern
secular democracy. In words of Anand Literature is “ I believe is the true medium
of humanism as against systematic philosophies, because because the wisdom
of the heart encourages insights in all kinds of human beings who grow to self
consciousness through conflicts of Desire, will and mood. I am inclined to think
that the highest aim poetry and art is ti integrate the individual in to inner growth
and outer adjustment. According to Anand the task of novelist is that of all
comprehending “God” who understands every part of his creation, through pity,
compassion, or sympathy which is the only kind of catharsis possible in art. The
word is itself the action of the still center. The struggle to relate the word and the
deed in the lie of men is the part of the process of culture, through which
illumination comes to human beings. The world of art is communication from
one individual to another, or to the group through the need of connect.”
For his realistic portrayals of the social economic problems
suffered by Indians because of the caste system and British colonial rule, Anand
is considered by many critics to be the India’s best writer. The value of his novel
according to Margaret Berry “ is the witness they offer of India’s attempt to
break out of massive stagnation and create society in which women and men
are free and equal.” Although Anand’s early works were faulted by some critics
for stereotypical characterization, didacticism and melodrama. They noticed a
restraint in later novels that enhances the persuasiveness of his appeal. Krishna
Nanda Sinha remarked “while the later novels retain passion for social justice
32
they sound greater emotional depthts.” Anand is the champion of the
underdog. He was the first Indian novelist to make an untouchable the hero of
the novel. Martin Seymour Smith remarked on Untouchable that it is “one of the
most eloquent and imaginative works to deal with this difficult and emotive
subject.” Anand also captures the ambiance of Punjabi life by literally
translating words and phrases, but this device doesn’t always succeed. Readers
outside the Punjab may find it difficult to make anything of phrases like “there is
no talk” and “ May I be your sacrifice”. However, Anand is successful in
presenting a vivid picture of the Punjabi farmer and problems of the poor. The
range of his novels is impressive, covering not only the Punjabi but life in towns
like Bombay and Simla. Tea gardens of Assam. He is above all the humanist, and
his humanism contains in it the all aspects of life, from the contemporary slums to
the Indian art and philosophy.
References:
1. E.M. Forster, Preface to Untouchable, Mulk Raj Anand, Untouchable( 1935; New Delhi: Orient Paperback, 1970).
2. Mulk Raj Anand, Untouchable (1935), Penguin Books Ltd.
3. Mulk Raj Anand, Untouchable, Arnold Hienemann Publishers, New Delhi, Reprinted, 1984.
4. Jaideep Sarangi, Indian Novel In English: A Socio-Linguistic study, Publishers- Prakash Book Depot, Bareilly.
33
5. Mulk Raj Anand, Lines Writtern to an Indian Art, Nalanda publishers, Bombay 1949.
6. Margaret Berry, Mulk Raj Anand: The Man and the Novelist, Amsterdom, Oriental Press, 1971.
7. Walter Allen, “ New Novels”, The New Stateman and Nation 46.1174, 5 Sept. 1953.
8. G.S.Balarama Gupta, Mulk Raj Anand: A Study of his Fiction in Humanist Perspective, Prakash Book Depot, Bareilli, 1974.
9. K.K Sharma (ed.), Perspectives on Mulk Raj Anand, Vimal Parkashan, Ghaziabad, 1978.
34
Anand’s Coolie & Untouchable: A Cultural Study
Chapter 3 : Cultural Aspects in Coolie and Untouchable
This chapter focuses on the different cultural aspects in Anand’s Coolie and Untouchable.
Though Anand had previously published some non-fiction the appearance of Coolie and
Untouchable established his credentials as a novelist. Untouchable(1935) is a fictional
statement on the tragedy of the untouchables in the India of the twenties and thirties, based
on the story of a sweeper lad calles Bakha. Twenty-six years later after the publication of this
work, Anand wrote another novel, ‘The Road’(1961) on the same theme of untouchability
where again he dramatizes the destiny of an untouchable, called Bhikhu, who is a new Bakha in
a changed situation. Both the stories dealt with the down-trodden. Infact, both novels Coolie
and Untouchable are excellent critiques of the Indian caste system and British colonialism.
Anand through these novels the showed the prevailing culture through the characters Bakha
and Munno of that particular time. Untouchable touches upon the life of Bakha, an unclean
outcaste and the humiliations that he has to face, he is eighteen, proud, “strong and able
bodied” a child of modern India who has started to think himself as superior to his fellow-
outcastes. Due to his low birth, Bakha’s fate is to work as a latrine sweeper ,while the Coolie
carries on its shoulders the tragedy of a fifteen year old labourer who dies of tuberculosis.
Today people may find Anand’s razor-sharp realism of Coolie to be brusque, but the fact is
that the novel still makes you squirm in discomfort with its naked realism. Benjamin Disraeli
rightly quipped “Never apologize for showing feeling. When you do, you apologize for the
truth”. The powerful critique of the Indian caste system suggested that British colonial
35
domination of india has actually increased the suffering of outcastes, such as Bakha. After 19
rejection slips Anand’s novel was published in England with a preface by E.M Forster:
“Untouchable could only have been written by an Indian who observed from the outside. No
European, however sympathetic, could have created the character of Bakha, because he would
not have known enough about his troubles. And no Untouchable could have written the book,
because he would have been involved in indignation and self-pity.”
Saros Cowasjee, writing in the Journal of commonwealth Literature, appreciated and
praised Untouchable on many levels. “ The novel is not only a powerful social tract but also a
remarkable technical feat.” Cowasjee wrote “ The action takes place within the compass of a
single day, but the author manages to build round his hero Bakha……..a spiritual crisis of such
breadth that it seems to embrace the whole of India”. Untouchable has two functions Social
and emotional. On social level it awakes the readers from the slumber who are unaware of life
in a caste society, and sparked critical debate and Commentary. On emotional function, E.M
Forster wrote in the preface of the novel “ it has gone straight to the heart of its subject and
purified it”.Anand wrote more than 24 novels and short stories but proper stating of his career
we can say that lunched with the publication of “Untouchable” in 1935.
This novel criticized Indian caste system. Untouchable stands as the most moving
book in the corpus of Anand’s writing. In ‘ The Story Of My Experiment With White Lie’ Anand
reveals that the Bakha story was one of the numerous episodes narrated in a 2000-page
confession he had writtern as an adolescent youth. It was a long, loose, amorphous narrative in
which he had described all his experiences-a kind of body-soul search. Bakha figured in this
narrative as a ‘rare human being’ whom Anand had known from his childhood and “adored as a
36
hero because he was physically like a God, played all the games superbly and could recite whole
cantos from the epic poem Heer Ranjha of Waris Shah….” But this rare person was humiliated
and insulted everywhere because he was an untouchable. Of all his novels it is immediate
product of his personal experience and the culture, ethos of India in which he grew
up. Untouchable is based on an incident in his own life. Injured by a stone, the young Anand
was taken home by the lower caste Bakha, who was subsequently abused by Anand’s mother
for polluting her son. The novel conveys all of these facts along with an understanding of dual
nature of the untouchable mindset, for while the untouchable hated by all Hindus because he
cleans latrines he still has pride. Action of untouchable confined to a place resembling town
with where he lived as a boy. Anand’s boyhood was a cultural changing place. He come in
contact with west as India was under British rule but traditional hold of culture was somewhere
also there. As caste system was very rigid. Uppercastes began to ignore occupational
requirements and taboos. But the rituals cultural constraints were as it is for the low castes
such as latrine cleaner, Street sweeper. To the literate and the educated person all these things
that was prevailed in Indian society seemed to be inhumane and insane. So intellectuals and
writers criticized this blind orthodoxy. Bakha the protagonist, who represents the misery and
inhuman treatment of the crushed before independence. The novelist narrates a single day’s
event in the life of bakha, an eighteen year old boy. He is the son of Lakha, the sweeper the
cleaner of latrines.Through these two characters Bakha and Lakha author hammers hard on the
caste conflict; a conflict which constitutes the core of Hindu religion and procures an obstacle in
the path of peace and prosperity. This novel also shows how an outcaste has to lead a life
meaner than animals; how inspite of his virtue, he has to tolerate insult and abuses, sometimes
37
for cause and sometimes without any cause: hoe he feels like a caged bird that flutters its wings
for a free flight; how “ his feelings would rise like spurts of smoke from a half smothered fire in
fitful jerks when the recollection of abuse or rebuke he had suffered kindled a park in the ashes
of remorse inside him”.
As the novel opens, we see Bakha receiving so many derogatory epithets by Lakha e.g..,
‘son of a pig’ (p-15), ‘you illegally begotten’ (p-17) scoundrel of a Sweeper’s son etc. we also get
description of the uncongenial conditions where these outcastes used to live on the very first
page of the novel “ The outcastes colony was a group of mud-walled houses that clustered
together in two rows, under the shadow of both town and cantonement, but outside their
boundaries and separate from them. There lived the scavengers, the washerman, the barbers,
the water carriers, the grass cutters and other outcastes from the Hindu society. A brook ran
near the lane, once with crystal clear water, now soiled by the dirt and filth of the public
latrines situated about it, the odour of the hides and skins of dead carcases left to dry on its
bank, the dung of donkeys, sheeps, horses, cows and buffaloes heaped up to be made into fuel
cakes… The absence of a drainage system had, through the rains of various seasons, made of
the quarter a marsh which gave out the most offensive stink. And altogether the ramparts of
human and animal refuse that lay on the outskirts of this little colony, and the ugliness, the
squalor and the misery which lay with in, made it an ‘uncongenial’ place to live in.”
So from here one can get the clear picture of the place where these outcastes were forced to
live by the higher class. Bakha goes to clean the latrines of Havildar Charat Singh, the famous
hockey player of the 38th Dogras regiment Bakha used to do his work quickly without any delay
and irrespective of his job of cleaning the latrines he remained clean and Charat Singh is so
38
impressed by his good conduct and he Promised to give him a hockey stick. On getting the stick
Bakha was on seventh Cloud as he was so happy. “ he was grateful, haltingly grateful,
falteringly Grateful, stumblingly grateful, so grateful that he didn’t know how he could walk the
ten yards to the corner to be out of sight of his benevolent and generous Host”.(p.122) Through
this episode of Charat singh giving away the hockey stick, The author wants to point out the
inner urge of the untouchables, which seems To be covered with the ‘dead leaves’ (P.B Shelley’s
Ode to West Wind).
Once Bakha inadvertently touched a caste Hindu in the market. The castemen became so
furious that they began to chide him by dint of abusive language ,swine dog .Bakha continued
to listen to their insult and humiliation but he never opened his mouth .He bent his forehead
and mumbled something .But all his requests fell flat on them .the other man sitting there also
began to hiss like a snake “this dirty dog bumped right into me .So unmindfully do these sons of
bitiches walk in the streets !he was walking alone without the slightest effort at announcing his
approach ,the swine ”,page 54. Bakha was surrounded by the crowd of people .He was so
confused that he was dumb-founded. He felt he should run ,just to shoot across the throng
away from this unbearable torment. But in spite of his earnest apologizes,”the staring, pulling,
jeering and learning ” crowd was sadistic in watching him covered with abuses and curses.
Fortune favored Bakka ,a Muslim Tonga Walla arrived at this critical moment and rescue d
Bakka. It is just an irony a Hindu is insulting Hindu but a Muslim is consoling him !This whole
incident left a deep impact on the mind of Bakha ”why are we always abused the sentry
inspector that day abused my father .They always abuse me .Because we are sweepers.
Because we touch dung .They hate dung .I hate it too .That’s why I came here .I was tired of
39
working on the latrines everyday .That is why they don’t touch us ,the high castes”(page
58).This pettiest plight of untouchable reminds us of the Booker Price author Arundhti Roy who
presents a similar attitude in her debut novel TheGod Of Small things .Velutha ,like Bakha , in
this novel not allowed to enter the house of the upper caste .They were not allowed to touch
anything that touchable touch this dangerous disease of caste conflict was on its full swing
before independence ,it is still seen much or less in almost every state of India. The birth of a
new enlightenment in Bakha results from the central dramatic situation in the novel; touching
of Hindu boy in the market and being slapped and subjected to the most inhuman treatment
before a crowd of people. It is this fateful accident that opens his eyes for the first time and lets
him have vague glimpses into the real meaning of his ownself, his own place in the society. “
For them I am a sweeper---untoucahble! That’s the word: untouchable, I am an
untouchable”(57). This moment is “ the central point of Untouchable”. It becomes a crucial
moment of realization when the main character fully understands his place in the social order.
From this moment of self realization, begins a ostracized hero’s spiritual voyage towards a new
destination. As a hero Bakha embodies the tragedy of a whole community of untouchables of a
particular historical epoch. In Anand’s own words,
“ In Untoucable I meant to recreate the lives of the millions of untouchables through one single
person, in only one incident. The slap on the face of the hero. Now the slap on the face evoked
all human relations…of the sixty five millions of people whom the hero represents, against the
millions of caste Hindus”.
From the moment of the slap on his face Bakha gets transformed in to a fable figure.
The untouchables ,the socially isolated people who from the most important part of the nation
40
have to lead a deplorable and miserable life beyond description .E.M Froster rightly hold the
view :“the sweeper is worse off than a slave, for the slave may change his master and his duties
and may even become free, but the sweeper is bound forever ,born into a state from which he
can’t escape and where he is excluded from social intercourse and the consolations of his
religion .Unclean himself, he pollutes others when he touches them .They have to purify
themselves, and to rearrange plans for the day .Thus ,he is disquieting as well as a disgusting
object to the orthodox as he walks along the public roads ,and it is his duty to call out and warn
them that he is coming” it is to be noted that untouchability is one of the greatest evil of our
country .In the “Manusmriti ”,the law book of the Hindu social code and domestic life ,we see
the pathetic plight of the untouchables ,who are deprived of gaining knowledge, particularly the
vedic knowledge .According to this book the untouchables has no right to go to the temples ,no
liberty to listen the incantations of the Vedas or the other great scriptures at that time Sanskrit
supposed to be the richest language and untouchables were also deprived of reading and
studying this language ,so one of the cause of degeneration of Sanskrit language is
untouchability .One another incident in untouchable that is ‘Temple incident” flings a harsh
and rugged satire on the hypocrisy and ostentations of the upper caste people like Pandit
Kalinath Who though hates the untouchable invites, Mohini, the sister of Bakha to quench his
sexual Thrist. He makes improper suggestions to her. On her denial, he begins to shout ‘
polluted, polluted, polluted’ What an irony! He is the priest, the highest caste in hierarchy of
caste system. He is supposed to lead a life of purity both inwardly and outwardly. But here he
invites the untouchable Mohini to the temple, the abode of God. He wants to molest her and
41
that to just that time where all Dalits and untouchables were exploited badly. Females were
exploited both mentally and physically by the people in command sometimes raising a
question on the integrity and status of the women, whereas writers like Mulk Raj Anand
always aimed at bringing all these evils to light and raising the curtain from the ill-treatment
and ever worsening aspects of lower caste people that were prevalent at that particular time.
This has also become a culture among the individuals holding a reputed and higher positions in
the society to use the Dalit women to quench their unhealthy desires and thirst.Primary
concern of Mulk Raj Anand is to present a humanitarian compassion for yhe dalit and deserted
,He himself admits :
“I hope for world in which the obvious primary degradation of poverty has been
completely removed.So that man can have enough food ,clothing and shelter
to grow up as strong and healthy humanbeings ,physically and mentally and
pro-crate a fine race to people of the universe ,in the place of those stunted
,subnormal ,miserable millions ,tortured by starvation, disease ,unemployment
and war who have been the background of my life .I want this for all men and
women ,irrespective of race ,color and creed, with special provisions for
planned health and housing facilities or the backward and the extara special
provisions for the care of very old and very young”
And this is what the novelist expressed in Untouchable.to crown the fact he has
introduce even Mahatama Gandhi as a character in the novel who delivers a
lecture against untouchability ,superstition and other evils tormenting the nation
from the time in immemorial. Bakka feels delighted when Gandhi gaves the
42
appellation of Harijan sons of God ,to the Bhangis and Chamars .Bakha is
inluenced by his words ‘the fact that we address God as ‘the purifier of the
polluted souls ’makes it a sin to regard anyone born in Hinduism as polluted--it
is satanic to do so .I have never been tired of repeating that it is a great sin .I
don’t say that this thing crystallized in me at the age of 12 ,but I do say that I did
then regard untouchability as a sin ”
Coolie is a great novel of pre-Independence India. It is a masterpiece by
Anand depicting the reality of life. It is a story of a porter boy that shows fingers
to reality of life. He comes from his village home to to the city and works
vigorously in various places. This novel gives a chilling picture of this down
stepped porter boy, Munno, who at his early stage gets into obscurity of his own
existence. Finally he dies of tuberclosis. Munno is severely despised and
maltreated by the callous and entirely adverse people—his aunt in the village,
the Bank Sub-Accountant and his wife in Sham Nagar, Mrs. Mainearing at Simle
etc. Munno starts from his village to a role as a servant in a house likewise as
worker in factory, and then eventually as a richshaw puller. Darkness of life is
completely described by author. Coolie is a novel that beautifully expresses the
struggling, starving mass sometimes without any cause. This novel is a satire on
the tragic denial of the workers—domestic servants, coolies, richshaw pullers
etc. who are tortured and tyrannized by so many evils like industrialism,
capitalism and above all colonialism. Protagonist of this novel, Munoo is a
orphan and he could feel the itch of it and Anand could rightly give a heart
43
throbbing description of his mental state and his all activities in a unique way.
This novel is really touchy for an emotional person. In opinion of K.R.s Iyengar:
“if Untouchable is the micro-cosm ,Coolie is more like the macro-cosm that is
Indian society: concentration gives place to diffusion and comprehension .
coolie,sis verily a cross section of India ,the visible India ,the mixture of the
horrible and the holy,the inhuman and the humane ,the sordid and the
beautiful…in Untouchable the evil is isolated as castes :in Coolie the evil is more
widespread, and appears as greed ,selfishness and inhumanity in there hundred
different forms ”
Munno, who represents the million Indians, bears the brunt of social injustice and
class antagonism from pillar to post. In the opening of the novel we see Munno,
14 year old orphan being ill-treated by his cruel aunt in the village: “Munno!ohe!
Munnoa! Oh mundu! Where have you died? Where have you drifted, you of the
evil star? Munno leaves his native land with his uncle, Daya Ram, the peon of
the Imperial Bank Of Indiaand goes to earn the bread to Babu Nathoo Ram,
Sub Accountant. But his innocence begins to bleed when he comes in contact
with reality. The employer’s wife is so rough tounged and cold to him that she
destroys the sweet dreams of this adolescent boy. He is treated worse than an
animal in the house:
“Eater of your masters !Strange servant you are that you fall asleep before tha
sun sunsets! What is my use of a boy like you in the house if you are going to do
that everyday. Wake up ! Wake! Wake up !and serve the Babauji his dinner . or
44
atleast eat your food before you sleep ,if sleep and die you must ”(p:25)
Undeserved suffering and unbearable taunts of the house mistress one day,
make Munno slip out of the Babu’s house. He heaved a sigh of relief after
escapinp from the Babu’s house and his state of mind was beautifully expressed
in the last lines of second chapter of the novel “Later, he breathed the pure air.
He didn’t know where the train was going, but he was thankful to be in the
moving thing.”(p.76). In the train he sees a ray of hope in the form of Prabha, a
passenger of the train who takes Munno to Daulatpur. But very soon misfortune
invades his life as his benefactor becomes bankrupt. Munno becomes a Coolie
at the station. Ther too he has to face many trials and tribulations, Cares and
anxieties. By accident ,Munno is taken to Bombay with the help of an elephant
driver of a circus company there he starts working in Sir George White Cotton
Mills .This mill was owned by a British men. There Munno met Hari , his fellow
worker and they both lived in a slum .The author presents a truthful picture of
the dwellings of the slum : “The mud flow was at a level lower than the path way
outside ,overgrown with grass which was nourished by the inflow of the rain
water. The cottage boasted not a window nor a chimney to let in the air and
light and to eject the smoke .But then ,had it not the advantage of the sound
sack cloth curtain at its door, when most of the huts in the neighborhood had
torn and tattered jute bags , or broken cane chicks if old rags ,bent tins and
washing and what not ,to guard them against the world ?”(p:202)
These neglected and downtrodden people use to live in the unhealthy
45
atmosphere .Bakha ,the protagonist of Untouchable also lived in such a
atmosphere where it was difficult to stand due to the bad smell and stink
.Hunger and poverty exploitation and retrenchment of workers leads to the
cause of strike . This eruption gives birth to Hindu-Muslim riots. Munno was also a
human being and also have a desires and he wants to escape from all these
burdens and wishes to lead a life of solitude far from the din and bustle of city
life .When he steals out of the place he was dashed down to un consciousness
by the car of Mrs .Main waring ,and indolent lady who takes him with her to
Shimla but his health begins to run down due to overwork ,ill nourishment and
undeserved sufferings :which collectively leads to his lonely death “But in the
early hours of one unreal ,white night he passed away :The tide of his life having
reached back to the deeps .”(p:317)
Thus through Munno ,Anand has exposed the selfishness and cruel
behaviour of the big guns of the society ,who seldom pay any attention to the
cries of the poor ,The Dalit and the deserted .Coolie comprehends the deeper levels of despair
and degradation with a subdued undercurrent of delight. Munno, moves from village to the
town, from the town to the city and then to the mountains broadening the canvas of the novel.
He is eventually swept to his doom. He is a frail boy in a hostile world. He is more a victim than
a rebel. Anand expresses his rage at various kinds of exploitation ranging from capitalism to
communalism. Chapters three and four of the novel depicts Munno’s experiences in Daulatpur
and Bombay emphasizing his savage struggle for survival. Munno has to endure the foul smell
and stink, damp and sticky sweat, dust and heat and dung. In such climate life is threat and
46
death is release. The rich merchants are contrasted with the dark coolies in their patched up
rags who lives in the congested hovels. Coolie has an edge over Untouchable because it is
according to the Iyenger, ‘most extensive in time and space, evoking, variegated action and
multiplicity in character’.
There is enough of such human existence in around and society , but under the pressure of
survival these persons are ignored everyday .This book makes the people to think for a while
who just seek only a decent living .People may find Anands razor sharp realism of Coolie
brusque but the fact is that novel still makes the reader twist in discomfort with its naked
realism .The charm of book lies in its detailed description of the misery of the million mass ;
Munnos’s warm-heartedness : his irrepressible wish to fly freely in the sky of freedom and
liberty. Anand is of the opinion that even the poor and the socially neglected people can also
rise to the status of general people provide they are given proper facilities , proper education
and proper justice .He rightly observed:
“I hope for the world where men and women will awaken through the first elementary battles
for the bread ,peace ,fresh air and freedom ,which they are fighting to see the slow fire that is
rising from the great ,smoldering ashes of their lives :So that having struggled on the horizontal
plane , they earn the right to stand perpendicular and touch the stars ; so that they can live
perceive the true worth of their humanity , dignity of man …
So in this chapter we come across many cultural aspects ,many cultured restrictions
in the novel Coolie and untouchable . Through the lives of Bakha and Munno how it has a
become a culture among the upper caste to exploit the lower caste without taking care of the
47
thing that they are also human beings , they also have some whims and desires .Mulk Raj Anand
dives deep into the water of Indian village lives and churn out those unnoticed pearls and
diamonds .Anand takes a hammer in his hand and blow hard on the dead customs and
misleading customs .
References :
1. E.M Forster, Preface to Untouchable, Mulk Raj Anand, Untouchable (1935; New Delhi, Orient Paperback, 1970).
2. Saros Cowasjee, So Many Freedoms: A Study of the Major Fiction of Mulk Raj Anand ( Madras; Oxford UP, 1977).
3. K.R Srinivasa Iyenger, Indian Writing in English 4th ed., 1962 Sterling Publishers, New Delhi, 1984.
4. Mulk Raj Anand, The Road (1961) ; Sterling Publishers, New Delhi (1987).
5. Mulk Raj Anand, Coolie (1936; Delhi: Hind Pocket Books, 1972).
6. Arundhati Roy, The God Of Small Things, India Ink Publishing.Co.pvt.Ltd., New Delhi, 1997.
7. Mulk Raj Anand, Untouchable, 1935, New Delhi, Publishers- Arnold Heinamann, 1984 rpt.
48
Chapter 4 : Comparison With Other Works of Same Genre
In this chapter, to carry out the research and compare the works of same genre we confidently
select some Indian English novelists that includes Raja Rao, R.K Narayan, Anita Desai and
Arundhati Roy, Who through their writings tried to depict the real India. Indian English novel
evolved as a subaltern consciousness as a reachen to break away from the Colonial literature.
Stories were there already in India steeped in folklores, myths written in number of languages.
However concept of Indian writing in English came much later and it with the coming of Raja
Rao, R.K Narayan, Mulk Raj Anand, the journey of English novel began. Social disparity of India
which was aptly described by Mulk Raj Anand in Coolie, imaginary village with its entire
realities in R.K Narayan Malgudi Days and aura of Gandhism depicted by Raja Rao’s Kanthapura.
They portray India with her sheer grandeur, tradition, realities, myths, heritage in most
eloquent ways.Another novelists like Amitav Ghosh dabble the post colonial Indian realities
while helps Vikram Seth to depict a rather new India laced with an air of Victorian aristocracy.
Actually it the Indianness of these writers that helped them to depict the culture of the society
of that time clearly. Sarangi in his book wrote “Raja Rao’s Indianness is a binding force the
result of many other forces-sense of tradition , culture ,heritage, geography,life attitude, habits,
deep rooted philosophy and social life”(P-49). It is very important to well versed with the
society about which you are writing. Sarangi also wrote “ In India writers have gone back to
their roots and yet, they have totally rejected the language of the colonizer, they opt for
hybridization of the adopted language”(P-119).
Raja Rao comes of a very old South Indian Brahmin family. He was born in 1909. He lived in
49
France from 1928 to 1939 and returned to India on the outbreak of World war second in 1940.
Again he went to France in 1946 and lived there till 1956. It was in France, thousands of miles
away from India, That he wrote his first novel Kanthapura (1938). His second novel ‘ The
Serpent and The Rope’, published after a gap of 22 years, has France as its scene of action, and
reveals that Raja Rao has fully absorbed and assimilated the culture of the west. In the early
thirties before leaving for France for higher studies, Raja Rao had writtern a couple of essays to
express his love for his motherland and his fascination for Indian culture and vedantic
philosophy. All this love of Indian culture and philosophy colours ‘ The Serpent And The rope’.
Raja Rao is a great son of mother India, and his greatness has received national and
international recognition. He won the Sahitya Academy Award for ‘ The Serpent And The Rope’,
which has been called the best Indo-Anglian novel ever writtern.
Raja Rao is a very prolific writer. He writes slowly, revises frequently and his works have been
published at a great intervals, because he wants to achieve perfection. ‘The Serpent And The
Rope’ has cultural and ascetic contents in it. Rooted in native ethos, the novel manifests the
basic assumptions which sustain Indian culture in all its complexity. The theme of love and
marriage, leads to the larger concern of the quest for self-knowledge beautifully suggested in
the very title itself. Though Raja Rao spent most of his life abroad, his love for the inherited
culture has not diminished and remains his central preoccupation. Raja Rao himself admitted
this that “ My roots are in this country…..i live abroad but I am chained to this country(India)”. It
is obvious that among the Indian novelists Raja Rao is the greatest interpreter of Indian thought
and culture. While the contemporaries like Mulk Raj Anand and R.K Narayan by and large
confine themselves to the social realities, Raja Rao concentrates on cultural and philosophical
50
dimension in his creative writings. Raja Rao has a wide experience of regions, languages,
cultures as he has traveled widely and had been in contact with different cultures of various
countries. As a result, his social contacts show variety of cultural fabrics mixed up in the
cultures of world. The novels of Raja Rao basically illustrate not anything else but character’s
awareness about their own culture while interacting with western culture. There is a significant
relation in man and culture. Culture as whole is the overall pattern of human action in a
particular society, culture is powerful than life and even stronger than death. So sometimes it
doesn’t satisfy us and sometimes it fulfill our desires.
His masterpiece ‘ The Serpent And The Rope’ begins with Ramaswamy’s coming back to India
after spending some years in France, and his metaphysical definition of the re-discovered
country. In this case, protagonist’s awareness of the two cultures intensifies his concern for his
own identity. He is in search of true image, torn between the traditional values he has absorbed
from childhood and the new values his education has bestowed upon him. The hero of the
novel Ramaswamy, met Medelaine, a college teacher of history at the University of Caen. She
loved Ramaswamy because he was an Indian and she loved India. Soon they are married and
have a child. After sometime it was discovered that their marriage was not a union of souls but
a result of temporary lust for physical pleasures. The initial proximity between the two coming
from diverse cultural stocks as they do undergoes a serious rift and eventually they part away.
Both of them are not satisfied with each other’s behaviour and try to find some anomaly in
their way of living. What Madelaine says about herself to Ramaswamy is meaningful in view of
her class and so to which she belongs:
“ you will never understand us the French. There is piety of course and compassion. But Lord
51
there is so much calculation. I tell you virtue is a part of French bourgeois economy”( Serpent p-
136).
Moreover , in the marriage of Rama and Madelaine, two contrary world views come together
and novel is a study of that encounter. While comparing and contrasting the culture of two
main characters, Raja Rao comes to the conclusion that both are complementary to each other.
As the hero Ramaswamy believes that one can know one’s culture better by coming in contact
with another as he himself realizes in the company of Madeliane and she also feels that she has
come to know Indian culture through her contact with Rama. Inspite of their sharply
differentiated attitudes towards life, Ramaswamy and Madelaine has one striking similarity as
characters: they are intensely conscious about the epistemologies they represent. Hardly ever
do they regard themselves or each other simply as individual human beings. Instead they are
constantly interpreting their own and each other’s actions in terms of their national and
cultural differences, invariably comes to an end with generalizations about Indian and western
traits of characters. Besides dealing with Ramaswamy’s relations with Madeliane and Savithri,
the novel is essentially a spiritual autobiography of Ramaswamy, for that matter Raja Rao’s own
spiritual quest in so far as there is a close resemblance between the hero and the novelist. The
hero tells his own history and includes as much as possible with a view to telling the whole
truth. It is not mererly the events of his life that Ramaswamy recounts but but tries to find the
truth hidden behind them.
Finally , Ramaswamy realizes on his return to India that the whole European culture and the
materialistic civilization is only an illusion like the Serpent, while the Indian spiritual Advaitic
Vedant based vision is the reality, the rope. However , The Sahitya Akademi awarded fiction
52
The Serpent and The Rope seems to be very unique in that context which highlights the cultural
and philosophical heritage of India. Raja Rao succeeded in achieving a synthesis between East
and West, “tradition” and “Individual talent” while endowing it with an unusual spiritual bias.
His novel Kanthapura is a classic of the Gandhian movement, a work in which the Gandhian
struggle for independence and its impact on the Indian masses finds its best and fullest
expression. This novel is a impact of this Gandhian struggle on a remote South Indian village
named Kanthapura, and what happens in Kanthapura was happening all over India in those
stirring years from 1919 to 1931 of the Gandhian non-violent, non-cooperation movement for
the independence of the country. Gandhi ji doesn’t make a personal appearance in the novel,
as he does in the Mulk Raj Anand’s Untouchable with such disastrous consequences, but he is
constantly present in the background, and at every step there are references to important
events of the day such as the historic Dandi March and the breaking of the Salt law. Hence for the proper understanding of different aspects of novel it is essential to form a clear idea of the
important political and social events connected with the Indian Freedom Struggle. India’s
struggle for independence from the colonial rule of the British goes back to the war of 1857,
which the British dismissed as a mere mutiny. The valiant Indian freedom fighters were
defeated in their first war of independence but their spirit of India was not crushed. The battle
of India continued to be fought on the social and economic fronts. Some of the name of social
reformers are Aurbindo Ghosh , Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Swami Vivekananda, Rabindra Nath
Tagore and Keshav Chandra Sen who brought about the renaissance of the late 19th century.
They work ceaselessly for the eradication of such social evils as child marriage, Sati,
Untouchability, Purdah system and exploitation and ill-treatment of widows. They waged a
53
constant war against illiteracy, superstition, blind faith and orthodoxy. They highlighted the
grinding poverty of the Indian masses who were being rendered poorer and poorer as a result
of the economic exploitation on the part of their foreign rulers. In this way these early patriots
paved the way for the Gandhian struggle for independence. It is also a great village novel, a
novel with, “ the various facets of the village life, with its socio-economic divisions,
superstitions, religious and caste prejudices, blind faith in God and Goddesses, poverty, petty
jealousies, dirty lanes, shady gardens, snake infested forests, dirty pools, hills, rivers, and
changing seasons.” The Kanthapura is a microcosm of the macrocosm; it is Indian in miniature.
It is one of most authentic and most remarkable village novel ever writtern by an Indian in
English. It is also remarkable for its realistic and impartial presentation of the impact of
Gandhian movement. The novelist succeeded to capture the very spirit of that stirring days
when Gandhi transformed the entire nation in to an army of freedom fighters.The novelist’s
style of narration makes it a Gandhi Puran or a Gandhi epic. Kanthapura is a major achievement
but Raja Rao himself considered it confused and immature. Kanthapura was published in 1938,
after that there was a long silence till 1960 when he came out with his “The Serpent And The
Rope”. In an interview published in the Illustrated Weekly Of India in january 1964, Raja Rao
said “ for me literature is Sadhna---not a profession but a vocation”. All the things major or
minor that were present in the culture and society pre-independent India and that shaped the
minds of the people are beautifully mentioned and discussed in this novel. Religion also played
an important role and Indian masses were deeply religious and so religion was freely exploited
by the Indian patriots all through the freedom struggle, as they were ready to do anything on
the name of religion. It was also a part of that blind faith in religion that the higher class used to
54
treat the outcastes, untouchables so badly. The religious sentiments of the rural folk were fully
exploited by B.G Tilak, by introducing the Ganpati festival in Maharashtra and instilling in them
courage, patriotism, discipline and unity. Students were also persusaded to take part in these
celebrations. The festival was used as a suitable instrument foe educating the masses and
making them politically conscious. Even the Britishers took advantage of this blind faith of
Indians and made them fight on the name of religion. In the Bhisham Sahni’s novel Tamas,
religion has been used as a weapon to disintegrate the people of India, as Britishers were also
aware of the fact that it will become very easy for them to rule over India. In Tamas there was
an incident that was responsible for Hindu-Muslim riots and killing of many innocent people.
Britishers by hiring the people of India by offering them money or some other temptations they
throw a dead pig in front of mosque and a cow in front of temple. So at this Hindus-Muslims
keep on fighting with each other and Britishers become spectators and do the work of adding
fuel to the fire. So these kind of incidents were very common and from here we can judge and
see the blind faith of the people on religion that thay were ready to go to any extent.
It is mentioned in this novel Kanthapura also that religion was used in
this way to awake the people. There are recital of Kathas and holding the Harikathas in the
novel. People of Kanthapura are poor, ignorant and superstitious. As we have already discussed
that people of pre-independent India were deeply religious and this deep faith of the people
can be better seen in the novel. People of Kanthpura have full faith in Goddess Kenchamma,
the pressing diety of the village. Right in the centre of the village is a temple dedicated to
Kenchamma, “ Great Goddess, Benigh one.” Marriages, funeral, sickness, death, ploughing,
harvesting, arrest, release—all are watched over by Kenchamma according to the faith of
55
villagers. “ There may be small pox or influenza around but you make a vow to the Goddess, the
next morning, you wake-up and you find the fever has left you. Didn’t she kill the demon who
killed their children and molested their wives? And so she will continue to protect them, come
wind, come rain, come any distress.”
Moorthy or Moortahappa is an educated young man. He is the central figure in the novel. But
he has nothing heroic about him, nor he can be called the hero of the novel. He is an ordinary
young man with common human weaknesses. He is one of those thousand of young men who
were inspired by Mahatama Gandhi to give up their studies. The Gandhian struggle for
independence had three strands—political, religious and social and all these strands meet in
Moorthy. It is not mere a political novel, but the novel concerned as much with the social,
religious and economic transformation of the people, as with struggle for political freedom. All
the incidents that are depicted in the novel are the actual incidents of the India’s struggle for
freedom. This book pictures vividly, truthfully and touchingly the story the resurgence of India
under Gandhi leadership. As we are already discussing that many bad social evils were there in
pre-independent India as casteism we discussed in untouchable, exploitation of lower castes
we see in Coolie. So Gandhi freedom movement came as boon for the lower castes and as a
curse for the Britishers. With the efforts of many social reformers now the common people of
India started understanding what Britishers are actually doing. They are exploiting us in every
way. Money is their main aim. The boycott of foreign goods was meant to cripple the efforts of
foreign manufactures to exploit and impoverish India, and the insistence on spinning taught
people the dignity of labour as well as self reliance. In a poor country like India simple living
must be practiced. Moreover, spinning could provide a regular income to the common masses ,
56
especially to women who have no other means of earning available to them. Gandhi’s
emphasis on education and avoiding alcoholic drinks had both a moral and economic aim. If the
poor coolies who are grossly exploited by the owners of plantation learn to read and write, they
would better aquainted with their rights and would not be cheated so easily. Drink is the
greatest enemy of the poor because because it never allows a person to spend his income on
essential items or make a saving for the rainy day. The novel opens with an account of the
situation, the locale of the village. Kanthapura is a village in Mysore, province of Kara. After
giving the account of the topography Raja Rao comes to the village itself. It has a complex
structure based on caste divisions. It has four and twenty houses in the Brahmin quarters, it has
a pariah quarter too, a potters quarters, a weavers quarters and a Sudra quarter. These socio-
economic divisions in the village, which has in all 600 or 100 houses, at once strike one with the
novelty. And the novelty is not the invention of the novelist, it is there in the village, has always
been there, in this land of villages. In this way by telling us of the various quarters into which
the village was divided, the novelist has higlighted the fact that the Indian villages are caste-
ridden, that there is no free mixing of people even in the small and the limited community of a
village. In Kanthapura there is much implied criticism of casteism. It is described through
Bhatta and later through Swami. Both are conservative, orthodox Brahmins, are the agents of
British government and work together to frustrate and defeat the Gandhi-movement. Since the
Swami’s power rests on the superiority of the Brahmins over the other castes, he takes the view
that the caste system is the very foundation of Hinduism. He maintains that no Brahmin should
have contact with the pariahs, and threatens to excommunicate Moorthy because he does so.
Later this threat is actually carried out people of the lower castes are not admitted inside the
57
temples but must Have darshana of god from outside.The villagers are also depicted in their
real colours.Thus the political movement of Swaraj is closely linked with religious reforms and
social uplift in Kanthapura. Kanthapura unlike coolie focuses on the intensity of Indian life, its
physical immediacy, its traditional swaddling and its religious murmurations ( William Walsh).
Mulk raj Anand was able to unite nationalism with socialism in to one Humanitarian movement,
a single revolt against oppression. But Raja Rao’s novel suggests here and there a conflict
between the conservatism of Gandhi and the socialist aspirations of many of his followers
including Moorthy. It is a regional as it deals with the physical features, people life, customs,
habits, manners traditions, language etc. Of a particular locality. And after reading this novel
we dive more deep in to the culture of the India particularly when India was fighting for its
freedom.
Another leading figure in the history of Indo-Anglian literature along with Mulk Raj Anand
and Raja Rao is R K Narayan. He is widely regarded as India’s greatest writer in English. He has
gained international reputation even among the readers in England and USA , who’s native
language is english. R K Narayan had an ability to make he rhythm and intricacies od Indian life
accessible to people of other cultures. Narayan is the pure artist. He remains unruffled by
political movements. He is free from Anand’s propaganda as well as Bhavni Bhattacharya’s
vigour. He does not disparage the Indian politician’s nor does he believe in exsulting the
importance of Indian spiritual heritage like Raja Rao. He is the only major writer in Indo-Anglian
fiction who is free from didactiscism or propaganda. He has no desire to preach, to advise , to
convert. Narayan may be described as the novelist of middle class. His noves presents members
of Indian middle class as engaged in a struggle ‘To extrigate themselves from the automism of
58
the past’. In the words of Dr Paul Verghese, “ Though not vehicles of mass propaganda, his
novels also depict the breakdown of feudal society and express the changed ideas concerning
the family as a unit and the conflict between old and new.” R K Narayan is a novelist of
common people and common situation. He is a realistic writer but his realism is different from
surface realism. He did not see the ugly side of reality. Narayan wrote all his novels in a type of
English which is peculiar to him with a distinct Indian colouring. He has writtern 15 novels and
scores of short stories. Narayan wrote art for art’s sake. In each of his novels he has presented a
slice of life as he saw it, with colourful description. His main works includes Malgudi Days,
Swami And His Friends, The Guide, The Vendor Of sweets. He told stories of simple folks trying
to live their simple lives in changing world. The characters in his novels were very ordinary,
down-to-earth Indians trying to blend the tradition with modernization, often resulting in
tragic-comic situations. As we are discussuing in this work that, people were deeply religious,
society was changing rapidly, and the conservative people were trying to adapt the changing
world, people were finding it difficult to adapt the modern western ideas. All these problems
are beautifully depicted in the novel ‘The vendor Of sweets’. The novel revolves round a father
and son ‘Jagan’ and ‘ Mali’ depicting the rae complexities of the Indian-middle class society
trying to adapt to the changing world, blending the traditional values with modern outlook and
style. Jagan, the central character in the novel is a widower, the sweet-meat vendor, who has a
deep love for his son Mali which often comes out as an embarrsed affection. As we discussed
kanthapura as a complete Gandhi-epic, here like Moorthy the main character of Kanthapura,
Jagan’s role model is also Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi being his role model, Jagan lived strictly
adhering to Gandhian principles though he was very much particular of his profits from a sweet
59
shop. Jagan always keep the charkha with him and spins. He lived a simple life as Gandhi had
preached and practiced, keeping only two suits of dresses. Believing in the non-violence of
Gandhi, he wears the shoes from the skin of the cow which has died its own death. He never
looses temper, never becomes violent and never rebels. The novel thouroughly highlights the
difference in view points between Jagan and Mali, induced by the drastically changing and
modernizing world around. When Mali decides to abandon his schooling and does very
arrangement for his studies abroad Jagan’s paternal feeling are thrown into confusion. Jagan
was deeply bewildered when Mali returns from America after 2 years with a foreign girl which
he introduces as his wife. He was also disturbed by his son’s new business plans for marketing a
story writing machine. Jagan’s fatherly love for his son however covered up his frustration and
silently agreed to Mali’s views. As the novel progresses Jagan is found utterly shattered when
he realizes his son had ruined the sanctity, his cherished traditional notions of marriage, morals
and principles. After recollecting his adulthood and married life jagan realizes the the drastic
disparity that had grown between perceptions of himself and his only son Mali.
Finally, at the age of sixty, Jagan tries for an escape bombarding his tight shell of parental
love leaving every thing else behind. The novels of narayan upholds the Traditinal Hindu world
view. The novel has caught the the very flavor and atmosphere of Hindu way of life. Novel is the
veritable picture of Indian life, and Jagan, the unheroic hero of the novel is the spokes man
through which this Hindu life has been exhibited. He himself writes, “you cannot write a novel
without Krishna Ganesh Hanuman, astrologers, pundits and devasis.” The Bhasmasur legend
serves as a background in his novel. The man-eater for Malgudi. Jagan the vendor of sweets
speaks out in the very beginning of the novel a universal truth enunciated in The Gita, “conquer
60
taste and you will have conquered the self”. Jagan all the time keep on sitting under the picture
of goddess Laxmi hanging on the wall, and all the time offers prayers. The main attaraction of
Narayan’s personality is that he is pure Indian both in spirit and thought. Vendor of sweets is
essentially an Indian novel. He catches the atmosphere and the very flavour of the economic,
religious and social life of India in all his novels. We can see the joint family culture in his novels.
He describes even such minute observations as the hunting of the grasshoppers are reluctant to
leave the paltry shade of the weed-plants. Narayan offers us a peep in to the literary and
religious life of India by reffering to some of the immortal books like Kalidas’s Shakuntla. Social
life of India is also depicted in the novels of Narayan. Through the social life we better come to
know about the culture. At many places we get a deep glimpse into various aspects of social life
of India. He describes the joint family of Jagan’s parents, the crowded houses, the bustle and
the pomp, the glory it was once and then the loneliness of the later life, the caste system,
traditions and customs, faiths and superstitions. The Indian marriage has been vividly
described. The expedition for seeing the girl, the acceptance, the visit of the bride party along
with gifts, pundits the declaration of the marriage, and the dowry, the marriage party
expedition to Kuppam village, the celebration of the marriage with fanfare and pomp, the
quarrels threatening the breaking of marriage, Jagan’s passion for Ambika, his wife, the
expedition to the Badri hill for prayer, the birth of Mali, the conflict between father and son,
the advent of Grace, her house hold duties like a Hindu wife all these are vividly and
enchantingly described. The guide is also one of the most popular novels of R.K Narayan and it was awarded
Sahitya Academy honour. The authorial presence is there, but it is always intercepted by
61
looking back in to the past. And connecting Raju’s previous affair with the dancer to the to his
present life as a fake sadhu. Narayan works in to the deep-seated convictions of the poor
villagers, in India. Sadhus in India are not always born they are also made. Narayan works with
the popular psyche of people living in villages, by bringing it upon the hero of the novel who has
already found himself in jail. This is an important feature of The Guide. The railway Raju
becomes a tourist guide, then he gradually shapes in to a Sadhu. Narayan’s story moves
through a cycle: the railway Raju turns in to guide, then sadhu and finally he is transformed in
to a human being who practices penance for the welfare of the other people. The guide is far
from being an expose of phony Godmen exploiting the gullible masses. Narayan cannot make a
pitch in favour of mechanization or development as the cure of all ills, including drought.
Instead , very hesingtatingly, very tentatively, richly embroiding his text with irony and
ambiguity. Narayan actually seems to ask, “who is to say that these things cannot be true? Who
is to say that a man like Raju cannot become a Guru?”. Narayan does not endorse tradition in a
loud and sententious manner, but because he doesn’t reject it outright or condemn it out of
hand, he creates a special space for it. Tradition thus reaffirms itself as an unusual, unexpected
way quietly, not stridently. In the struggle between tradition and the modernity, tradition wins
not in a triumphalist way, but in an unassertive, almost inept way-----inspite of itself, very
reluctantly as it were. This is because both raju’s penance and his ultimate sacrifice are real no
matter how painfully flawed his motives may have been earlier or how ineffectual their
outcome.
Apart from untouchability and casteism another thing that was prevalent in Pre-
Independent was feminism and gender discrimination. As it was a conservative patriarchal,
62
male dominated society where woman have a very little share in total happiness of the family;
where they are seldom allowed to take education and where men always ruled over women,
the powerful over the weak and touchable over the untouchable. There were and are many
evils that are prevalent in the society. And the writers from time to time with the power of their
pen tried to write on these evils. Out of those Arundhati roy in her novel The God Of Small
Things portrays a truthful picture of the plight of the Indian women, their great sufferings, cares
and anxieties, their humble submission, persecution and undeserved humiliation in a male
dominating society. It also shows the struggle of women for seeking sense of ‘Identity’ in a
totally aversed and envious society. The social structure of an average woman is full of many
ups and downs, ifs and buts. It can be clearly seen in the woman characters like Ammu,
Mammachi, Baby Kochamma, Rahel and Margaret Kochamma.
Education is said to be the third eye of man. It must be given to both men and
women without any gender and racial discrimination. Education develops all the faculties of
man—physical, mental and spiritual. It enlightens and broadens a person’s outlook. But we
come across another cultural aspect of the pre-independent society that it was not only
untouchables that were not allowed to enter that school but women were also not allowed to
study. They donot have right to education.This aspect is highlighted In the novel “ The God Of
Small Things”. In this novel Ammu didin’t get higher education because her parents think that
higher education corrupts the lady. As preference was given to male child in our society and
this is still valid till the present date. Ammu has to discard education; but on the other hand,
Chacko, her brother is sent to Oxford to study, though he didn’t do good there. What an irony
that male child was forced to study even if he denied but female child was not even if she
63
wished to study. In fact even today, though inspite of a fundamental improvement in women’s
stature by our constitution and various amendments, we see in India, except a fistful section of
society, that the conservative and superstitious mind of a large number of people are against
the higher education of girls. This problem can be clearly seen in a conservative family where
‘purdah’ is strictly maintained and also in the rural areas where women are supposed to be
meant only foe mating and procreating. Ammu is the central character of the novel who was
humiliated, insulted and misbehaved by her father, ill treared and misbehaved by her husband,
badly insulted by police and deserted and rendered destitute by her brother. Her tragic story
from the beginning to the end, arouses our sense of pity and catharsis. According to Aristotle
man of high rank can have the tragic grandeur. But here Ammu falsify this conception of
Aristotle. Like the tragic heroes of Shakespeare she has to suffer many trials and tribulations as
In “Hamlet”. Hamlet is a tragic hero and he suffered due to one flaw in his charcter that is
indecisive nature. He kept on delaying the revenge of his father due to one reason or the other
and in the end we felt pity for him and for his flaw that drove him to the death. Like Hamlet,
Ammu also has one fatal flaw in her nature that ultimately leads her to death, is that she didn’t
follow the age long rigid tradition of a patriarchal love laws that lay down “who should be
loved. And how. And how much?”
All the suppressed persons do have some whims and desires in them as Bakha ans Munno in
Anand’s Untouchable and Coolie. Ammu in ‘the God Of Small Things’ fed up with the torture of
his father wanted to fly freely in the sky of liberty. Her wings fluttered:
“ All day she dreamed of escaping from Ayemenem and the cluthches of her ill tempered father
and bitter, long suffering mother. She hatched several little wretched plans. Eventually one
64
worked. Pappachi agreed to let her spend her mother with distant aunt who lived in
Calcutta.”(p.38-39)
There in someone’s wedding reception she met an Assistant Manager of a tea estate in assam
and decided to marry him. But soon after marriage she discovered that she has jumped out of
frying pan into the fire. Her husband was alcoholic. Again here we can see the never ending
lust of males towards women. The English Manager of tea plant wanted to have sexual relation
with Ammu. Husband of Ammu put this proposal in front of her and in a scuffle she hit her
husband and left a place with the twins Estha and Rahel. When she returned to Ayemenem she
found her parents cold and indifferent to her and her children. Arundhati Roy wants to make us
feel that without the presence of woman, home is not home but dreary wilderness. But what
Ammu has to see both in her husband’s house and her own house is not based on the fiar
principle of equality. In this way author filngs a harsh irony on the man’s domination over
woman. She seems to say that women are not a mere toy or an object of pleasure or a means
of gratifying the man’s baser passions but the noble and the richest part of man’s life. It is
also a great irony that a daughter estranged from the husband is tortured and tyrannized in the
parent’s house. But on the other hand, an estranged son, Chacko, not only receives warm
welcome but also remains the rightful inheritor of the family’s wealth and fortune. When he
flirts with the low woman he was encouraged by Pappachi in the name of “Man’s need”.
Where as the same behaviour of Ammu is termed as illicit, untraditional and sinful. She was
locked in a room and is beaten black and blue. In brief, at the age of twenty four, an age of
enjoyment and merriment, Ammu’s life came to a standstill---“ she spoke to no one. She spent
hours on riverbank with her little plastic transistor shaped like a tangerine. She smoked
65
cigarattes and had midnight swim” (p-44). In other words, all her home and in her family and
society, she became virtually “untouchable”. It can be seen in the point of view of Baby
Kochamma:
“……. A married daughter had no position in her parent’s home. As for a divorced daughter, she
had no position anywhere at all. And as for a divorced daughter from love marriage, well, words
could not describe Baby Kochamma’s outrage. As for a divorced daughter from a
intercommunity love marriage---Baby chose to remain silent on the subject.”(p.45-46)
So we can see that the prevalent traditions, cultural restrictions of the society in which one lives
from a long time washes away the brain of the person that even the mother is saying all these
things to her daughter and irony here is that woman are against the novel. Ammu comes in
contact with Velutha, a paravan untouchable caste and she developed illicit sexual relation with
him. When her father discovered this Ammu was locked in a room. So having no support, no
sympathy from anywhere, she left big house Ayemenem and “died in a grimy room in the
Bharat lodge in Allepey, where she had gone for a job interview as someone’s secretary. She
died alone”(p. 161). In the morning when the sweeper went to the room he found the Ammu
dead. She aws dragged outside. Ammu is such tragic character that her last rite was not done
properly with the traditional rituals. Even the church refused to burry Ammu. So Chacko, hired
a van to transport the body to the electric crematorium where “no body except beggars
derelicts and the police custody dead were creamated there”(p.162). No one from the family
was present there. “ The door of the furnance clanged shut. There were no tears” (p.163). Thus
the Ammu is an entirely tragic character tortured and abused by police, family and politics. It is
not the male folk alone responsible for her tragic plight but mostely the woman characters like
66
Mammachi and Baby Kochamma who may be called the real culprit to engender suffering in
Ammu’s life. Thus Ammu’s character presents the picture of the average woman in the present
day social set-up.
Out of main voices of modern English fiction Anita Deasai is the major voice. She ushered in a
new era of psychological realism in this genre with her novel ‘Cry, The Peacock’. The
reoccurring themes of her novels that we come across is the agony of the existence in a hostile
and male-dominated society that is not only conservative but also taboo-ridden. The texts of
Anita Desai are remarkable for their socio-cultural commentary on modern modes of existence.
City life in India in all its variety and detail, constitutes a large chunk of her writings. Her
protagonists are usually sensitive women who, haunted by a peculiar sense of doom, withdraw
in to a sequestered world of their own. Breathing the polluted air of the city her characters try
to escape from the cages, sometimes successfully and sometimes not, and in the process get
mentally bruised and spiritually battered. Her novel “The Village By The Sea” has a sub title “ An
Indian Family Story”, and it has been praised for its building up the Indian scene most
successfully.Dr. R. K Dhawan observed about this novel is “Through the characters of Lila and
Hari, who are brothers and sisters, and who take upon themselves the task of looking after their
younger sisters owing to the ill-health of their mother and the unemployment and the
diplomacy. Here Anita Desai presents the vivid picture of the freshness of rural life in
contradistinction to the mechanicality of life in the metropolitan city of Bombay. She also
shows very clearly hoe the innocence of rural life can provide a healing touch to the bruised
mind of Lila’s father and hoe the curse of poverty and superstitions could be transformed with
the help of the forces of science and the process of industrialization”. Supremacy and
67
importance of family is the another weighy themes in the works of Anita Desai. The family
motive was used by Anita Desai in the novels “ Voices in the City” and “ The Clear Light Of the
Day” very successfully. In ‘ The Village by the Sea’, the motive is used in a more primitive and
elemental manner. Drunkenness of the father, sickness of the mother, dowry for virgin sisters---
food for all and clothes are to be arranged, and the entire family has a collective fate of joy and
pain, poverty and prosperity.
Every society has some ills in it and in the same way and if we talk about pre-independent it
also has many evils in it as we have discussed in above mentioned works of the Indian Novelists
like Raja Rao, R.K Narayan, Arundhati Roy and Anita Desai. Duty of a true author is to become
the mouthpiece of the people of society and bring out the existing evils with in the society. So
like a true authors , all worked for the reform of the reform of the society. They become the
voice of the lowly rustic people.
References:
1. William Walsh, R.K Narayan: A Critical Appreciation ( Heinemann: London, 1992), p.61
2. Jaydeep Sarangi, Indian Novel in English: A Sociolinguistic Study, Publishers- Prakash Book Depot, Bareilly.
3. Amar Nath Prasad, British And Indian Literature: A Critical study, Publishers-Sarup And Sons, New Delhi.
4. K.R.S Iyenger: R.N.Tagore: A Critical Introduction, Sterling Publishers, New Delhi 1987
5. Arundhati Roy, The God Of Small Things, India Ink Publishing.Co.pvt.Ltd., New Delhi, 1997.
68
6. R.S.Sharma, Arundhati Roy’s The God Of Small Things: Critique and Commentary, Creative Books, New Delhi, 1998.
7. Mithilesh K. Pandey, Academy Awarded Novels In English: Millennium Responses, Publishers- Sarup and Sons, New Delhi.
8. Raja Rao, The Serpent And The Rope(1968), Orient Paperbacks, New Delhi.
9. C. Paul Verghese , Problems Of Indian Creative Writers In English, Bombay, Somaiya Publication.
10. Dr. Raghukul Tilak, Raja Rao’s The Vendor Of Sweets, Publishers- Rama Brothers India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.
11. Raja Rao, 1974, “Preface” Kanthapura, London, Oxford University Press.
69
Chapter 5 : Conclusion
An attempt has been made in the foregoing chapters to study the novels of Anand as
a cultural study and study of culture of Indian society particularly before independence. of that
particular time in which they are writtern. While this study can lead to some important
conclusions, it may also help us to see the fictional art of Anand in its process of
development.This chapter focuses on the major conclusions that are obtained from the results
of analysis of the collected data. Literature is a writtern evidence of human achievements,
predilections, predicaments recasting human relations in given society. Society is a group of
individuals with shared beliefs, common ties and general laws. Man is a member of society. He
can’t live in isolation. As both the novels which we have choosen to carry out the research
Coolie and Untouchable are novels of pre independent India, Anand also joined the struggle for
independence and was much inspired by the preachings of Gandhiji and this is the reason that
he was present in that society and described the prevalent dominated culture in such a lively
manner. Anand’s writings are masterpiece of his natural talent for storytelling and the richness
of his description and exploration of humanity. Anand seems to be the crusader against all sorts
of injustice. The real test of man is to treat him above the barriers of all kinds. Anand’s love
hate attitude to both tradition and modernity becomes transparent in the novels discussed. He
attacks the ossified systems of traditional life with the hostility of an iconoclast, at the same
time, clings to tradition with nostalgic fondness. He presents modernity as an alternative to
traditional ways of life in novel after novel, but reveals the dreary face of modernity too.
Through his writings Anand also makes us realize that every man has its own self, Own
70
individuality and freedom of choice. Boundaries of caste, creed and nationality seems to affect
him. According to him the traditional beliefs and orthodox ideas stunt the growth of an
individual. By comparing we came to the conclusion “Indianness is essentially an important
criteria for Indian Writing in English because it gives Indian writing an Identity of its own”(P-71)
(Sarangi) Untouchable is reminder of unsolved questions. By careful study of Anand’s works we
come to many conclusions and get many messages.The message from The Untouchable,
writtern in pre-independent era is still valid. The story is heart touching and the message is
convincing. Mulk Raj Anand considers that the caste system can only prevail with the job one
carries and the easy way to remove it is to upgrade the work environment and bring dignity to
each work. We have no right to downgrade any work. The novels of Anand simply shows to a
way to solve the problems still lingers in India like sanitation and casteism. The novel
Untouchable simply shook our conscience. The author criticizes the social injustice with the
powerful words. He rips apart the hypocrisy of the powerful. Meaninglessness of worship and
its uselessness when it is not practiced is stressed. This book is also a small reminder of
ignorance of strength by the lower caste and need for moral rejuvenation. Above all, ‘any social
revolution should be practical’ is another message that these two novels of Anand Untouchable
and Coolie manages to convey.
On larger canvas, the author must have viewed untouchable living in all of us. Citizens
deprived of rights and burdens with obligations. The hurdle we have to overtake and how the
knowledge, civilization and technology can make a better world. By reading these two novels of
Anand and seeing the cultural restrictions and boundations on the individuals we feel and come
to the conclusion that most of the problems of Indian are self created. The Britishers could rule
71
India only because the masses were not seriously disturbed by their presence. Infact they were
busy in fighting with in themselves. We say that the Britishers made the caste system that was
already prevailed in India more rigid. But this is wrong but we Indians are responsible for this.
Britishers only took advantage of this and this is the factor that attracted them from thousands
of miles away to India. Infact we made it more easier for the Britishers to rule over India.
By reading ‘Two Leaves And A Bud’ we can see from the story and life of Gangu that it is a world
where innocence has to bend down before cruelity; where the wives and daughters of the
workers have to satisfy the lust of the White Sahibs; where the guiltless workers and low castes
have no right to raise their voice against their masters; where the insulted and the injured have
also to be the victim of pestilence hunger and poverty. All rights were with the higher and rich
people but nothing with the poor. And if someone gathered the courage to speak against
injustice his voice was also suppressed by killing that person or by causing harm of job, family
etc. Example of this is De La Harve, a sympathetic and ideal protector of the unprivileged. He
has to loose his job only because of his sympathy for the dalit and the destroyed. John De La
Harve is the mouthpiece of the novelist---a man who recognizes imperialism as a dangerous
part of capitalist exploitation. He works all day in his primitive labortary, observing cultures of
bacilli under a very old an inadequate microscope. During his process he thinks: “ All the
processes of change, colouring and unification were complimentary chemical decomposition.
And what was true of nature was true of society. Society development also was a complicated
process of action and reaction, of separation and systematization, in so far as individual existed
only in this relation to the community, in so far as he was the product of the climate in which he
was born and reared of the customs of the society in which he grew up.”
72
Another man in this novel is Reggie Hunt, the most cruel man of the novel. He behaves like a
brute. He even goes to the extent of making an attempt to rape Leila, daughter of Gangu, when
she leisurely plucked the leaves of the tea plant alone. But she manages to run away, he
followed her to her house. Mad with lust and fear, Hunt even guns down Gangu, who comes to
protect his daughter from rape. As no father can see his daughter being raped in front of his
eyes. But Irony is that Mr. Justice Mowberley finds Reggie ‘not guilty’. These kind of rape
incidents were common on Pre- Independent India but no one had courage to speak against
this. Even today if we see evils of that time are still in the one form or the other like casteism,
rape, honour killing are prevalent in the society. It is been more that 60 years of India’s freedom
and We still consider the caste of the boy or girl before marriage. Inspite of many laws people
still feel shame to come and talk about rape. If something of this kind happened they prefer to
hide this with the fear that what people will say, no one will marry etc. In untouchable the
intended meaning seems to be rejection of Hindu-society with its age old lies and brutal
discrimination against millions of untouchables. This rejection is to be accompanied by an
acceptance of the modernist values of the western world. Right from the beginning till end
Bakha’s dream is to be like the sahibs, the world of Tommies is his ideal world.
In the preface of ‘Two Leaves And A Bud’ Mulk Raj Anand wrote:
“ The world I knew best was the microcosm of the outcaste and peasants and soldiers and
working people……In so far, however, as my work broke new ground and represented a
departure from the tradition of previous Indian fiction, where the pariah and the bottom-dogs
had not been allowed to enter the the sacred precincts of the novel, in all their reality, it
seemed to become significant and drew the attention of the critics, particularly in Europe which
73
only knew Ommer Khayam, Li Po and Tagore but very little or nothing about the sordid or
colorful lives of the millions of Asia.”
Coolie as a fictional narrative basically reflects Anand’s ambivalent responses to the question
of the fate of man in a capitalist society of ruthless class exploitation. A Marxist humanist,
Anand shows a tendency to confront the dehumanization of capitalism with unyielding hostility.
Coolie has been described as a naturalist portrayal of life at its darkest moments. Munno is
orphan boy from India who wants to venture out in to the world. Yet the gist of the novel is
Anand’s analysis of the boy’s inner fears, thoughts and emotions and the description of the
darkest moments of Munno’s life until the moment of his death. Unlike Untouchable which
distuinguishes itself for its “miniature excellence and compressed simplicity” with its exclusive
focus on the protagonist, Coolie presents a vast and vivid panorama of the Indian society with
all its variegated facets of life. K.R Srinivasa Iyenger says “if Untouchable is a microcosm, Coolie
is more like the macrocosm that is Indian society; concentration gives place to diffusion and
comprehension, with several foci of concentration”.
There is in the novel a breathless shifting of the scenes, from the peasant household in the
Kangra valley to the oppressive tyranny of the sub-accountant’s house in Sham Nagar, from the
Imperial Bank at Sham Nagar to the pickle and jam factory in Daulatpur, from the horrors of the
Cat Killers’ lane to the sweat and tears of the vegetable market in the city, from the circus tent
in Daulatpur to the cotton factory of Bombay city, from the red light streets of Bombay to the
coolness and beauty of Simla, etc. As part of this largeness of canvas and topographic variety, a
whole range of distinctively varied characters pass through the richly textured panorama of life-
--the destroyed peasants and the parasitic landlords; the petit-bourgeois Indian babus and the
74
domineering English officials; the silent wives whose distuinguishing badge is the patient
suffering and the vituperative women reveling in sadism; men who are kindly and saintly and
those who are evil and satanic; the masters who ruthlessly destroys the workers and the coolies
who are subjected to endless suffering; motherly women with their loving protectiveness and
the prostitute women who lives a soulless life. Such is the hypnotic spell of this vast and varied
environment. Anand’s personal experiences and the reform of India’s political, social, and
cultural institutions are major elements in Anand’s writings.
Humanism in the novels of Anand is an interesting subject to understand and find
out a new outlook for the study of his novels. Anand is a humanist. His insistence on the dignity
of man irrespective of caste, creed and wealth , his plea for the practice of compassion as a
living value, his conception of the ‘whole man’, the profound importance he attaches to art and
poetry as instruments for developing whole men, his crusade against superstition, feudalism,
and imperialism—these are some of the chief characteristics of his humanism. The study of
‘Morning Face’, an autobiographiacal novel, brings out the ideas of Mulk Raj Anand on
Humanism. Like other humanists he believes that “ Man is the measure of all things”:man is the
maker and the breaker of the world. He believes in the supremacy of man. Anand admires man
and even adores him. According to him a man can solve his many problems with the help of
imagination, reason and advancements of science. The themes of his all the works is ‘whole
man”. ‘Morning Face’ and ‘Seven Summers both are autobiographical. ‘Seven Summer’ is the
story of Indian childhood that covers the first seven years in the life of the protagonist while the
‘Morning Face’ shows the protagonist passing from childhood to adolescence. (Naik ,1973:
112) Apart from Krishan the novel is peopled with variety of characters who almost create the
75
impression that we are here following, not the life history of an individual alone, but that of a
people, the society. Old—world manners, customs, attitudes vanished since and long forgotten
incidents, come back as if some body is unrolling a treasured tapestry. ‘Morning Face’, which a
wider scope presents the interaction between tradition and modernity in much more
comprehensive manner. Anand’s philosophy is an inveterate enemy of fascism, feudalism,
imperialism and other similar tendencies, which comes in the way of man’s effort to achieve
freedom. He believes in democracy and socialism, and the peaceful co-existence of all nations.
He further says that all people must have freedom social, economic, political, intellectual and
emotional without, of course any encroachment upon’s other’s freedom. Krishan also has many
dreams inside him as one of his dream is of owing “one of the topees which the sahibs wore.”
‘Morning Face presents the inner world of the protagonist’s consciousness and the outer tone
of the society in which he lives and grows. (Naik, 1973:128) the life of the Krishan is based on
the conflicts and clashes of mind in which he grows. Krishan says:
‘Similarly I loved my mother, because she was partial to me and yet despised for her
indulgence in all kinds of superstitions, ritual, her frugality and hate campaign against the
people she did not like.’M.K Naik in his book Mulk Raj Anand has discussed Anand’s Humanism
in detail. Anand thus become a novelist with a mission and his theory of the novel is naturally in
line with his commitment to his creed. Anand rejects God, fate, religion, past and future and
this philosophy of Anand we can find in all his novels.
Mulk Raj Anand is considered by many critics to be one of India’s best writers and
is often described as “father of Indo-Anglian literature.” He wrote a number of short stories,
novels and countless articles ranging from art, literature and painting. There are number of
76
books writtern on Anand. Through his socially conscious novels and short stories, Anand attacks
religious bigotry, established institutions, and the Indian state of affairs. At the same time, he
has greatly enriched his country's literary heritage. In The world literature Today ,Shyam M.
Asani comments that "Anand writes about Indians much as Chekhov writes about Russians, or
Sean O'Faolain or Frank O'Connor about the Irish." Along with R. K. Narayan and Raja Rao, he
has established the basic forms and themes of Indian literature that is written in English. Anand
told the World Press Review that Mahatma Gandhi, whom he met in the 1930’s, significantly
shaped Anand’s social conscience and showed him the power of truth and simplicity. Thus the
brief survey aptly shows that Anand’s primary business as a writer of fiction is to attack the
social snobbery and prejudice, superstitions and untouchability. He seems to urge for an
attitude full of love and sympathy for the millions of people living under the poverty line and
leading a life worse than an animal. Almost all novels of Anand venture in to that land, which is
largely ignored. In the history of Indo-Anglain fiction, the credit at first goes to Mulk Raj Anand
who identifies himself with the weak and the vulnerable, the hated and the insulted. When we compare the works of Anand with the works of another novelists of same
genre we will find the main aim of all were to bring out the evils of the society whether it is
casteism, discrimination, untouchability, male dominance etc. In Arundhati Roy’s “The God Of
Small Things” we witness the problem of every common woman of the society through the
character of Ammu. And through character of Ammu, Arundhati Roy raises a number of
question marks on our age long myths and traditions, history and legends. She shows that right
from the beginning of creation ‘ woman have been subject to many insults and abuses.
Arundhati Roy lashes out at the hypocritical moral code of the society, which makes a great
difference between men and the women. As a matter of fact importance of woman in the life
77
of man can not be ignored. Woman holds an important place in their lives. Without woman the
life of man is like a ship without radar. Critical exploration of the novel clearly told the untold
miseries and undeserved suffering of male domination silently and meekly. In other words, the
book presents a universal theme of social consciousness. It also examines jealousy between
woman and woman, the plight of woman in the male dominated society. This novel on larger
canvas seems to be that author has expressed her sympathy towards a social woman whose life
in society is full of uncertainity, humiliation and ups and downs. She is like a bird in the cage
that wants to fly freely in the sky. But her wings are cut down by the callous society. She shows
how a woman in the patriarchal society, yearns for pleasure and happiness and life free from
social constraints. Arundhati Roy won the Booker Prize for literature by her debut novel, The
God Of Small Things, a novel which registered a tremendous sale all over the world. The book
has been translated into more than 40 languages in the world. This novel is bit a
autobiographical in nature. As Anand’s Untouchable is inspired by his childhood incident this
novel of Arundhati Roy also has reflections of Roy’s own childhood on the limpid black waters
of the Kerela and the society she lived with caste prejudices. Kerela, the most educated state
with many castes and classes has been beautifully represented. The novel peeps into the life of
Kerelaite society, their rites and customs, traditions and patriarchal domination; a caste ridden
mentality of some certain section of people. The book is writtern and moulded in such a way
that it surely will shook the conscience of reader and cannot help without giving a jolt and jerk
to the average reader. Narayan’s stories also begin with realistic settings and everyday happenings in the lives of a
cross-section of Indian society, with characters of all society. Gradually fate or chance, oversight
or blunder, transforms mundane events to presposterous happenings. Unexpected disasters
78
befalls the hero as easily as unforesenn good fortune. The characters accept their fates with an
equanimity that suggests the faith that things will somehow turn out happily, whatever their
own motivations or actions. Progress, in the form of Western-imported goods and attitudes,
combined with bureaucratic institutions, meets in Malgudi with long-held conventions, beliefs,
and ways of doing things. The modern world can never win a clear-cut victory because Malgudi
accepts only what it wants, according to its own private logic. So Anand speaks not only of the reality in the phenomenal world but also of the reality in
world that is non-existent. This non-existent world is a product of his imagination.
References:
1. Mulk Raj Anand: Aopology for Heroism, Bombay:1946
2. Mulk Raj Anand: Morning Face, Kutub Popular, 1968.
3. M.K Naik: Mulk Raj Anand. London, New Delhi: Heinemann India, 1973.
4. Mulk Raj Anand, Untouchable, 1935, New Delhi, Publishers- Arnold Heinamann, 1984 rpt.
5. Jaydeep Sarangi, Indian Novel in English: A Sociolinguistic Study, Publishers- Prakash Book Depot, Bareilly.
6. Arundhati Roy, The God Of Small Things, India Ink Publishing.Co.pvt.Ltd., New Delhi, 1997.
7. Mulk Raj Anand, Preface to the Second edition of Two Leaves and a Bud; 1951.
8. Amar Nath Prasad: Nagendra K. Singh, British And Indian English Literature; Roots and Bloosoms, Vol 2., Sarup and Sons, New Delhi.
79
9. M. K Naik (ed.), A History of Indian English Literature, New Delhi, Sahitya Academy, 1982.
Selected Bibliography
1. Primary Sources :
80
(a) Novels
Mulk Raj Anand, Untouchable, 1935, New Delhi, Publishers- Arnold Heinamann, 1984 rpt.
----Coolie, 1936, New Delhi, Arnold publishers, 1981
2. Secondary Sources :
(a) Works by Mulk Raj Anand ( Fiction)
---Two Leaves and a Bud, 1937, Arnold Heinemann, New Delhi, 1983.
---The Sword and the Sickle, Kutub Popular, Bombay, 1955.
---Seven Summers,1951, Orient Paparback, New Delhi, 1970 rpt.
---The Private Life of an Indian Prince, 1953, Arnold Heinemann, New Delhi, 1983.
---Morning Face, Kutub Popular, Bombay, 1968; Arnold Publishers, New Delhi, 1976.
---The Old Woman and The Cow,1960, Arnold Heinemann, New Delhi, 1980.
---The Road, 1963, Sterling Paperback, New Delhi.
---Confession of a Lover, Arnold Heinemann, New Delhi, 1976.
---The Bubble, Arnold Heinemann, New Delhi, 1984.
(b) Non-Fiction
Mulk Raj Anand, Apology for Heroism,1945, Arnold Heinemann, New Delhi, 1985.
---Lines Writtern to an Indian Air, Nalanda Publications, Bombay 1949.
---Author to Critic: The Letters of Mulk Raj Anand to Saros Cowasjee, Writers Workshop, Calcutta, 1973.
(c) Articles :
Mulk Raj Anand. “ Anglo-Indian Literature” Life and Letters Today, Vol. 15, No. 5, Autumn 1936.
81
---“ The Writers Role In National Integration”, Indian Literature, 1963, Vol.6, No. 1, 1963.
---“ How I became a writer”, Contemporary Indian Literature, Vol. 5, Mulk Raj Anand special 1965.
---“ The Story of My Experiment with a White Lie”, Critical Essays on Indian Writing in English, ed. M.K. Naik, S.K Desai and G. S Amur, Dharwar, 1968.
---“ Why I write?” Perspectives on Mulk Raj Anand ed. K.K Sharma, Vimal Parkashan, Ghaziabad, 1973.
(d) Critical Books On Mulk Raj Anand :
Saros Cowasjee. So Many Freedom: A Study of the Major Fiction of Mulk Raj Anand, Oxford University Press, Madras, 1977.
M.K Naik, Mulk Raj Anand, Arnold Heinemann, New Delhi, 1973.
Jaydeep Sarangi, Indian Novel in English: A Sociolinguistic Study, Publishers- Prakash Book Depot, Bareilly.
Anand Apology For Heroism: A Brief Autobiography Of Ideas, Kutub-Popular, 1946. Dr. Raghukul Tilak, Raja Rao’s Kanthapura, Rama Brothers India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.
M.K Bhatnagar, Indian Writing In English (Vol. 1 to 5), Atlantic Publishers and Distributers. Neena Arora, The Novels of Mulk Raj Anand; A Study of His Hero, Atlantic Publishers and Distributers
(e) Other :
V.T Patil and H.V Patil, Gandhism and Indian English Fiction : The Sword and the Sickle, Kanthapura, and Waiting for the Mahatma, Devika Publications, Delhi 1997.
82
A. Sudhakar Rao, Socio-Cultural Aspects in Selected Novels of Raja Rao, Atlantic Publishers and Distributers, 1999.
Neena Arora, The Novels of Mulk Raj Anand: A Study of His Hero, Atlantic Publishers and Distributers.
Raja Rao, 1974, “Preface” Kanthapura, London, Oxford University Press.
Braj Kachru (1983), The Indianisation of English: The English in India, Delhi: oup.
Benedict Anderson (1983), Imagined Communities, London, Uerso and New Left Books.
S. Radhakrishnan, Hindu View Of Life, London, George Allen and Unwin, 1954