Rebalancing The Innovation Policy Debate by Dames, Robson, Smith, Tumilty

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Rebalancing The Innovation Policy Debate by Dames, Robson, Smith, Tumilty

    1/2

    87

    Rebalancing The Innovation Policy DebateMark Dames1, David Robson2, Madeline Smith3 and Tom Tumilty4

    [email protected]

    ABSTRACTInnovation, the successful exploitation of new ideas, is an important driver of economic

    growth. The traditional view of innovation as a pipeline process based around

    commercialising scientific or technological invention has today been replaced by a

    broader understanding that innovation is not necessarily linear and reaches far beyond the

    production of products to be focused on successful market outcomes. Based on the

    authors experience of innovation policy development in Scotland, this paper concludes

    that there needs to be a dramatic change in approach to innovation policy if Scotland is

    to sustain long-term economic growth and competitive advantage.

    1. INTRODUCTIONInnovation is one of the principal drivers of economic growth, standard of living and competitive

    advantage. Successful innovation creates customer value through new products, services and processes,

    giving rise to new markets and economic growth, as well as contributing to higher productivity, lower

    costs, increased profits and employment. Firms that innovate have higher global market shares, higher

    growth rates, higher profitability and higher market valuations. Innovation also generates spill-over and

    cascading effects as competing firms absorb new innovations. As innovations are adopted and diffused,

    the knowledge stock of the nation accumulates, providing the foundation for market growth, long-term

    wealth creation and higher living standards.

    The traditional conception of innovation as a linear process from research to invention, from

    engineering to product, and from manufacturing to marketing is now outdated. That model would

    suggest that the method for increasing innovation by increasing R&D inputs (technology push) would

    be sufficient. It is now widely accepted that the emphasis on technology-based innovation and R&D is

    necessary but not sufficient for success5. New knowledge can be an important ingredient for innovationbut it does not necessarily lead to innovation. Work undertaken by NESTA demonstrates that innovation

    can result from a wide range of situation not all involving R&D [ref(1)]. What seems to be critical is

    effective diffusion of knowledge, longer term engagement/interaction between a wide range of players

    in the innovation system and a strong enterprise culture and capacity.

    Government policy across Europe is currently being adapted to recognise innovation as a broadly spread

    capacity that is about successful market outcomes and the process by which those outcomes are generated.

    Here, innovation applies across the economy, including within the service sector and public services6, and

    1Innovation and Enabling Technologies, Scottish Government, Business, Enterprise and Energy Directorate, 6 Cadogan St, Glasgow G2 6AT.

    Seconded from British Telecommunications plc, 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ.

    2Scottish Government, Business, Enterprise and Energy Directorate, 6 Cadogan St, Glasgow G2 6AT. Seconded from Scottish Enterprise.

    3Head of Innovation, EKOS Ltd, St. Georges Studios, 93-97 St. George's Road, Glasgow G3 6JA.

    4Head of Innovation and Enabling Technologies, Scottish Government, Business, Enterprise and Energy Directorate, 6 Cadogan St, Glasgow G2 6AT.

    5The linear Science/R&D-push model has been losing support because it is not able to deal satisfactorily with the complexity in the innovation

    system. The linear model is rooted in a very traditional and rational understanding of scientific research utilisation which assumes a simple model of

    research producers on the one hand and research users on the other. It presupposes that knowledge created by the producers can be parcelled and

    pushed out to the relevant users and that users know what knowledge they need to secure to create innovation in their businesses and so pull this from

    the research base. As understanding of research utilisation and how innovation systems work has developed, it is clear that the push-pull model does

    not satisfactorily describe the complex and contextually contingent way in which knowledge is created and used. The concept of knowledge exchange

    is more helpful than the linear science-push model but even it is not fully satisfactory as a model for understanding the innovation process.

    6The EU has acknowledged this shift and is working towards redressing the balance. A recent communication from the Commission to the Council

    of Ministers and the European Parliament showed the extent to which this is changing. It acknowledged that existing EU or national innovation

    policy instruments do not adequately take into account the overall importance and specific needs of the services sector, and they regularly fail to

    acknowledge the need for innovation also in public sector services. It stated that there is a need to take a comprehensive look at policies relevant

    for services and reassess their focus from the viewpoint of service-related and non-technological innovation.

  • 8/7/2019 Rebalancing The Innovation Policy Debate by Dames, Robson, Smith, Tumilty

    2/2

    The remainder of this article can be purchased instantly at http://innovationscience.org

    Even better, knowledge is power so buy a subscription for your organization and have access to all

    our articles at a very reasonable price!

    If you are still undecided email the editor

    and he can provide you with this article as a free sample!

    International Journal of

    Innovation Sciencehttp://InnovationScience.org

    Editor-in-Chief: Brett E. Trusko, PhD

    Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    [email protected]

    Work phone - 212-824-7639

    ISSN Number: 1757-2223 Published quarterly

    275 (print + on-line)

    264 (print only)

    231 (online only)

    Open call for articles:Researchers, academics, and practitioners are invited to submit an article for review in our journal. IJIS

    also welcomes short research notes, research communications, survey and review papers on all

    innovation topics. Prospective author are warmly encouraged to contact the editor, we love talking

    about innovation.

    About the Journal

    The International Journal of innovation science is leading the way in transforming innovation from an art

    into a science and hopes to expand the literature by discussing advanced innovation in many different

    functional areas, industries, and countries. Visit us for more infohttp://www.InnovationScience.org

    http://www.multi-science.co.uk/ijis.htm