Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    1/16

    RCC design B.C.Punmia

    18.2 TYPE OF RETAINING WALLS

    1 Gravity walls

    2 Cantilever retaining walls a. T- shaped b. L- shaped

    3 Counterfort retainig walls.

    4 Buttresssed walls.

    The cantilever retaining wall resist the horizontal earth pressure as well as other vertical pressure by w

    A gravity retaining wall shown in fig 1 is the one in which the earth pressure exrted by the

    back fill is resisted by dead weight of wall, which is either made of masonry or of mass concrete . The

    stress devlop in the wall is very low ,These walls are no proportioned that no tension is devloped any

    where, and the resultant of forces remain withen the middle third of the base.

    A retaining wall or retaining structure is used for maintaining the ground surfgaces at defrent

    elevations on either side of it. Whenever embankments are involed in construction ,retaining wall are

    usually necessary. In the construction of buildins having basements, retaining walls are mandatory.

    Similsrly in bridge work, the wing walls and abutments etc. are designed as retaining walls , to resist

    earth pressure along with superimposed loads. The material retained or supported by a retaining wall

    is called backfill lying above the horizontal plane at the elevation of the top of a wall is called the

    surcharge, and its inclination to horizontal is called the surcharge angle b

    In the design of retaining walls or other retaining structures, it is necessary to compute the

    lateral earth pressure exerted bythe retaining mass of soil. The equation of finding out the lateral earth

    pressure against retaining wall is one of the oldest in Civil Engineering field. The plastic state of

    strees, when the failure is imminent, was invetigated by Rankine in1860. A Lot of theoretical

    experiment work has been done in this field and many theory and hypothesis heve benn proposed.

    RETAINING WALL

    Retaining walls may be classified according to their mode of resisting the earth pressure,and

    according to their shape. Following are some of commen types of retaining walls (Fig)

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    2/16

    y of beending of varios components acting as cantilever s.A coomon form of cantilever retaining waal

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    3/16

    b Surcharge anglem

    mm F

    Hieght of cantilever wall from ground level = 3.00 m @ c/c

    Unit weight of Earth = 18 KN/m3 m

    Angle of repose = 30 Degree mm F

    Safe Bearing capacity of soil = 100 KN/m3 @ c/cCoffiecent of friction = 0.5 m

    Concrete M- 20 25000 N/m3 mm F

    cbc 7 N/mm2 m 13.33 @ c/cSteel fe 415 N/mm2 st 230 N/mm2 m

    Nominal cover = 30 mm

    Surcharge angle b 16 Degree mFounadation depth = 1.00 m Toe

    Stem thickness At footing 310 mm At top 200 mm

    Heel width 900 mm Toe width 1200 mm mm F

    Footing width 2100 Key 300 x 300 mm @ c/c

    Reinforcement Summary

    STEM :- mm F @ c/c m

    Main

    2.58 12 mm F@ 90 mm c/c 8 F mm F

    1.94 12 mm F@ 180 mm c/c @ c/c

    Top 12 mm F@ 360 mm c/c

    Distribution 8 mm F@ 160 mm c/c

    Tamprecture 8 mm F@ 300 mm c/c mm F

    TOE :- @ c/c

    Main 12 mm F@ 120 mm c/c

    Distribution 8 mm F@ 170 mm c/c mm F

    HEEL :- @ c/c

    Main 10 mm F@ 210 mm c/c

    Distribution 8 mm F@ 170 mm c/c

    wt. of concrete

    3730

    DESIGN OF T SHAPED CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL

    with sloping back fill 8

    3000

    300 3000

    170

    180

    3730

    100% Reinforcement upto m

    50% Reinforcement upto m

    25% Reinforcement upto m

    8

    DESIGN SUMMARY

    12

    30

    12

    20

    8

    160

    12

    360

    90

    12

    360

    90

    12

    180

    210

    12

    8

    10

    12

    Heel

    200270

    1000

    Out side

    300

    Earth side

    2.58

    1.94

    9001200 300

    8

    170

    540

    730

    160

    2100

    120

    3730

    200

    3002.58

    1.94

    8

    4000

    [email protected]

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    4/16

    Hieght of cantilever wall from ground level = 3.00 m

    Unit weight of Earth g = 18 kN/m = N/m

    Angle of repose = 30 Degree

    Safe Bearing capacity of soil q0 = 100 kN/m3

    Coffiecent of friction m = 0.5 = 25 N/mmConcrete = M 20

    Steel fe = 415

    Nominal cover = 30 mm

    Surcharge angle = 16 Degree

    Founadation depth = 1.00 m

    1 Design Constants:-For HYSD Bars = 20

    st = = 230 N/mm = #### N/mm

    cbc = = 7 N/mm3

    m = 13.33x

    13.33 x 7 + 230j=1-k/3 = 1 - 0.289 / 3 = 0.904

    R=1/2xc x j x k = 0.5 x 7 x 0.904 x 0.289 = 0.913

    2 Diamension of base:-

    sin b = 0.276 cos b = 0.96 tanb = 0.29Sin F = 0.5 Cos F = 0.87

    cos b - cos2b -cos2f 0.961 - 0.92 - 0.75

    cos b + cos2 b - cos2f 0.961 + 0.92 - 0.75

    For surcharge wall, The ratio of length of slabe (DE) to base width b is given by eq.

    q0

    2.7 y H 2.7 x 18 x 4.00

    The base width is given by Eq.

    x

    x x

    ( 1 - 0.49 )x( 1 + 1.46 )

    x 4.00 x 0.38

    ( 1 - 0.49 )x 0.5

    0.6 b = 0.60 x 4.00 = m

    Hence Provided b = m

    Width of toe slab = a x b = 0.49 x 2.40 = 1.17 m mLet the thickness of base be = H/12 = 4.00 / 12 = 0.33 or say = 0.30 m

    = 2.40 - 0.30 - 1.20 = 0.90 m

    3 Thickness of stem:-

    = 4.00 - 0.30 = 3.70 m consider 1 m length of retaining wall

    K x y x H12 0.38 x 18 x( 3.70 )

    2

    = 46.75 x 0.96 = 45 kN

    46.75 Kn-m

    =

    Ka

    Eq (1)

    Hence the horizontal earth pressure is PH= P cos b

    1.20

    for design

    purpose

    =

    The base width from the considration of sliding is given by Eq.

    b

    =

    = 2.15

    b

    4.00

    = 1 -

    H

    m

    18000

    100

    =

    = 0.289

    2

    0.7

    =2

    Hence width of heel slab

    Heigth AB

    Maximum Bending momentat B =

    DESIGN OF T SHAPED CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL

    Cocrete M

    wt. of concrete

    13.33 7m*c=k=

    Provided toe slab =

    m*c+sst

    =

    (1-a) m=

    1

    mb =

    The wall will be unsafe against sliding. This will be made safe by providing a shear Key at base .

    4.13

    This width is excessive. Normal practice is to provide b between 0.4 to 0.6 H .

    Taking maximum value of H = 2.40

    =0.7HKa

    2.40

    0.49-

    Ka cos b

    (1- a) x (1+3 a)

    = cos b 0.96 0.38

    0.38 0.961

    = =x

    [email protected]

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    5/16

    H1 3.70

    3 3

    BM 55.50 x 10 6

    Rxb 0.913 x 1000

    = 250 mm and total thickness = 250 + 60 = 310 mm

    Assuming that 12 mm F bar will be used. a nominal cover of = 60 - 6 = 54 mm= 200 mm at top so that effective depth of = 140 mm

    45 x 1000

    1000 x 250

    4

    = 2.40 - 1.20 - 0.31 = 0.89 m

    = 3.70 + 0.89 x 0.29 = 3.96 m

    = 3.96 + 0.30 = 4.26 m

    0.38 x 18 x( 4.26 )2

    2 2

    PH = P cos b = 61.84 x 0.96 = 59.44 kN

    PV = P sin b 61.84 x 0.28 = 17.04 kN

    Full dimension wall is shown in fig 1a

    Let W1 = weight of rectangular portion of stem

    w2 = weight of triangular portion of stem

    w3 = weight of base slab

    w4 = weight of soil on heel slab.

    The calculation are arrenged in Table

    force(kN) Moment about toe (KN-m)

    w1 1 x 0.20 x 3.70 x 25 =

    w2 1/2 x 0.11 x 3.70 x 25 =

    w3 1 x 2.40 x 0.30 x 25 =

    w4 1 x 0.90 x 3.83 x 18 =

    w5 = 2.40

    Sw =Total resisting moment = kN-m ..(1)

    4

    3

    mSw 0.5 xPH

    - 87.7 = kN-m

    \ Distance x of the point of application of resultant, from toe is

    SM 128.18 b 2.40Sw 120.64 6 6b 2.40

    2 2

    SW 6 e 120.64 6x 0.14 67.55 < 100b b 2.40

    SW 6 e 120.64 6x 0.14 32.99 < 100b b 2.40

    67.55 - 32.99

    =

    x =

    Pressure p at the junction of stem with toe slab is

    Pressure p1 at

    toe

    =59.44

    x

    x 1 +

    1 -

    =

    Height H2= H1+Ls tan b

    Height H

    P is acting on vertical face IG, at H/3 and hence Pv , will act the vertical line

    40.90Pv 17.04

    Earth pressure p=

    Its horizontal and vertical component are

    26.085

    lever arm

    kN

    N/mm2 > tc even at mimum steel

    Length of heel slab

    tv = = 0.18

    PH x = 45.00 x = 55.5

    2.401.20 50.27

    =2.40 kN -m

    2

    Hence safe

    kN-m2

    Pressure p' at the junction of stem with Heel slab is

    p = 67.55 -

    1.06 m ==

    1.01 2

    ..(2)

    Over turning moment Mo = 87.7 kN-m

    = 61.84

    x =61.8

    total MR120.64

    18

    62.01

    1.2

    1.95

    1.41

    247

    215.89

    =

    1.255

    Detail

    mm

    18.5

    5.09

    Reduce the total thickness

    =Effective depth required

    B.M. at B =

    128.18

    =Ka x y x H

    2

    -

    Pressure p1 at

    Heel= 1 -

    Eccenticity e = x

    F.S. against Sliding

    215.89

    Pressure distribution net moment SM =

    Over turning

    \ F.S. against over turning

    Hence not safe , To make safe against sliding will have to provide shear key

    0.4

    Keep d

    =

    =

    x=

    -

    =

    =

    = 1 + =

    = Hence safe0.14 0.4

    2.40=

    m 540 Hence safe

    0.12 270 + 200100

    P D2 3.14 x ( 8 )'2

    41000 x 50

    6 Design of heel slab :-Three force act on it

    2 weight of heel slab 3 Down ward earth pressure 4 upward soil pressure

    3.70 + 3.96

    3.70 + 2 x 3.96 0.90

    + 3

    = 0.90 x 0.27 x 1 x 25 = kN

    Acting at 0.45 m from B.

    Earth pressure intencity at b = Ka.y.H1 per unit inclined area, at b to horizontal,\ Earth pressure at B, on horizontal unitarea = Ka.y.H1.tan b

    Vertical component of this, at B = Ka.y.H1 .tan b.sin b .(I)

    .(II)

    Hence total force due to vertical component of earth pressure is

    0.38 x 18

    = 1.86 kN m from B

    63.00

    = 0.455 m from B

    =2

    Ka.y(H1+H2)

    2

    (H1+2xH2)xb

    (H1+H2)x3=

    x

    Total weight of heel slab

    Acting at3.70

    Total weight of

    soil over Heel=

    2xx0.90

    1. down ward weight of soil

    Using

    12 mm bars

    And at underE

    x 0.90

    282 mm2

    2

    Spacing =

    8 mm F bars, Area

    Distribution steel

    sst x j x D

    = x x

    =

    3.96

    4mm say =

    =

    170

    b1 tan b x sin b

    =

    120

    120

    50

    mm c/c

    mm2

    x

    18 kNKN say

    6.08

    The reinforcement has to be provided at bottom face .If alternate bars of stem reiforcerment are

    = 62

    using

    are bent and continued in toe slab, area available (see step 7)628

    1000

    Reduce the total thickness to

    =

    Effective depth required =

    BM x 106

    Keep effective depth d

    x from E

    =

    tv

    896

    = 0.23=

    0.63

    39.09mm

    2

    tc even at mimum steel

    m

    N/mm2 0.14

    7 Reinforcement in the stem:-We had earliar assume the thickeness of heel slab as = 0.30 m

    0.27 m only. Hence revised H1= 4.00 - 0.27 = 3.73 m

    ka.y 0.38 x 18

    2

    S.F. x H1 47.52 x 3.73

    = 250 mm and total thickness = 250 + 60 = 310 mm

    = 200 mm or m at edge

    x

    230 x 0.904 x 250

    P D2

    3.14 x ( 12 )

    '2

    4

    1000 x 113

    113

    90

    Bend these bars into toe slab, to serve as reiforcement there. Sufficient devlopment length ia available.

    + 250 - 140

    PH

    3

    )2=

    2.0047.52

    kN-m

    x( 3.73

    Hence Safe

    S.F at B = pcos b = H12 = kN =

    Spacing =

    Using 12

    The effective depth d' at section is =

    =Actual AS provided =

    Between A and B some of bars can be curtailed. Cosider a section at depth below the top of stem

    1000 x

    H140 x

    90 mm c/c

    (where h In meter)

    1256 mm2

    h

    mm24

    = 991137

    =mm F bars, Area =

    mm say =

    106

    = 1137 mm2

    = 113

    =

    Keep effective depth d

    Reduce the total thickness to 0.20

    Ast = BMx100/sstxjxD=

    =

    0.14 N/mm2

    %

    While it has now been fixed as

    = 0.15

    steel provided tc N/mm2Permissible shear stress for

    Shear stress tv

    B.M. at B3

    x 100

    =

    =shear force

    =

    If tc > tvhence safe

    = 50

    Nomber of Bars =

    Hence Provided 10

    % of steel provided =

    Using 8 mm F bars, Area =

    mm c/c

    mm c/c170

    210

    mm2

    mm

    2

    =

    x2

    = 288

    288

    =

    = 174

    4

    = x 1000

    mm saySpacing =

    Hence provided these @

    from a distance of

    59.08

    = 78.5

    Spacing =

    10Using

    Distribution steel

    =

    =4

    mm F bars, Area =

    366= 214 mm say

    Ast = 15.97 10

    6

    sst x j x DBM x 10

    6

    =

    m from B

    =

    200

    < tc even at mimum steel

    29.67

    mm2

    mm2

    39.41

    0.41

    59.08

    tv

    Acting at =54.59

    Total upward soil pressure

    S.F. at B

    mm and D

    This is much lessthan the B.M. on slab. However, we keep the same depth, as that toe slab,i.e.

    mm, reducing it to

    N/mm2

    32.99

    = = 0.14

    = 366

    N-mm2

    x =

    [email protected]

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    8/16

    250 - 140

    H3

    d'

    h Ast' d'1/3

    H1 st

    where Ast' = reinforcement at depth h Ast = reinforcement at depth H1

    d' = effective depthat depth h d = effective depthat depth H1

    Ast' 1 h 1 d'1/3

    Ast 2 H1 2 d

    Subsituting d = 255 =( 140 + 29.5 x h ) we get

    140 + 29.5 x h 1/3

    x

    140 x 29.5 x hx

    h = 0.467 x ( 140 + 29.5 x h 1/3 ..(3)

    h = 2.83 m 0.467 x ( 140 + 29.5 x h)

    - h =

    Howerver, the bars should be extented by a distance of 12 F = 12 x 12 = 144 mmOr d = 250 mm whichever is more beyond the point.

    \ h = 2.83 - 0.25 = 2.58 m. Hence curtailed half bars at at height of2.58 m below the top . If we wish to curtailed half of the remaining bars so that remaining

    Ast' 1Ast 4

    h 1 x d' 140 + 29.5 x h 1/3

    H1 4 d x

    x 140 x 29.5 x h4 x

    h = 0.371 x ( 140 + 29.5 x h 1/3 ..(4)

    h = 2.19 m 0.371 x ( 140 + 29.5 x h) - h =

    .Howerver, the bars should be extented by a distance of 12 F = 12 x 12 = 144 mmOr d = 250 mm whichever is more beyond the point.

    \ h = 2.19 - 0.25 = 1.94 m. Hence stop half bars the remaining barsby 1.94 m below the top of the stem . Continue rest of the bars to the top of the stem

    Check for shear:-

    Shear force = 182

    47.52 x 1000

    1000 x 250

    Ast/A = 1137 / 113 = 10.06 say = 11 No.

    11 bars of mm F at Bottom11 x 113

    1000 x 250

    0.50 % = 0.3 (See Table 3.1)

    here 0.30 > 0.19

    Distribution and temprechure reinforcement:-

    = 310 + 200

    0.12

    100

    P D2 3.14 x ( 8 )'2

    4

    1000 x 50

    = 8 = 300 mm c/cboth way in outer face

    0.01

    255

    = H1

    Hence

    d' =( 140

    =

    Now As )1/3

    =

    Ast dor

    x h

    Ast H =(

    140 x h )29.49++3.73

    ,,,'(1)

    Hence Provided 12

    255

    x

    h = 3.73

    =\

    2 255

    mm and d'

    x

    h =

    if Ast = than

    H1

    1/2 Ast

    2

    =

    x

    remaining reinforcement is one forth of that provided arB, we have

    % of steel provided = x 100 = 0.50 %

    Hence from .(2)=

    Permissible shear stress for steel provided tc N/mm2

    \ h

    This can be solved bytrial and error, Noting that if the effective thickness of stem w=are constant,

    x

    0.00

    \

    h = 3.73

    =4 255

    = 0.38p = kNxkayH

    2

    23.73

    2

    =x

    \ tc

    If tc > tvhence safe Hence Safe

    47.52

    = 0.19 N/mm2 < (see table 3.1)

    Average thickness of stem2

    = 255

    =tv

    Nomber of Bars =

    mm

    \ Distribution reinforcement = x 1000 x 255 = 306

    = = = 50.24 mm2

    4

    mm bars

    mm c/c at the inner face ofwall,along its length

    mm2

    Using 8 mm F bars, Area

    306= 164 mm say = 160

    for tempreture reinforcement provide

    \ spacing

    [email protected]

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    9/16

    8 Design of shear key:-

    300 x 310 Let Pp be the intensity of passive pressure devloped

    in front of key this intencity Pp depend upon the soil pressure P in front of the key

    Pp = KpP = 1/Ka= 1/ 0.38 = 2.64 x 50.27 = kN/m

    Pp x a = x = 39.74 kN

    18 `

    2.00

    or PH = 3.42 x( 4.53 )2x 0.961 = 67.22 kN

    = 2.40 x 18 x 0.30 = 12.96 kN

    \ W = 120.64 + 12.96 = kN Refer force calculation table=

    mSw+Pp 0.5 x 133.60 + 39.74

    = 300 mm. Keep width of key 310 mm (equal to stem width)

    F where (45 + F/2) =2 shearing angle of passive resistance

    \ a1 = 0.3 x ( 2.64 )1/2

    a1 = 0.487 m = DE = 1.20 m

    Hence satisfactory.

    Now size of key = 300 x 310 mm

    Actual force to be resisted by the key at F.S. 1.5 is = 1.5PH - mSW= 1.5 x 67.22 - 0.5 x

    = kN

    34.03 x 1000

    300 x 1000

    34.03 x 150 x 1000

    1/6 x 1000 x( 300 )2

    = N/mm2 Hence safe

    Since concrete can take this much of tensile stress, no special reinforcement is necessary for the shear key

    > 1.5 Hence safe

    133.60

    67.22= 1.58

    Let u sprovide ashear key

    0.30

    The wall is in unsafe in sliding, and hence shear key will be provided below the stem as shown in fig.

    132.46

    \ total passive pressure Pp = 132.46

    .(2)

    Weight of the soil between bottom of the base and GJ

    0.38 x x 4.53Sliding force at level GJ = cos bx

    Hence equilibrium of wall, permitting F.S. 1.5 against sliding we have

    PH=1.5 =

    133.60

    34.03

    = 0.113 N/mm2

    =

    Actual length of the slab available

    a kp45

    Bending stress =

    \ shear stress =

    +

    0.34

    a tan F = a tana1 x

    it should be noted that passive pressure taken into account above will be devloped only when length

    a1 given below is avilable in front of key ;

    However, provided minimum value of a

    =

    [email protected]

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    10/16

    b Surcharge angle b Surcharge angle b SurchA A A

    m H1 m m H1= m m

    toe heel

    D E B C D E B C D E B

    Toe Toe a1

    m m

    D1 e

    p = pp

    3.70

    1.00

    1.20

    a b

    W1

    2.40

    0.20

    3.00 3.70

    4.00H=

    0.20

    3.00

    0.

    0.20

    3.00

    2.40

    W1

    W2W2 0.90 0.00

    2.40

    P=

    P=

    0.30 0.30

    b =b =

    50.2

    7

    W1

    2.40

    1.20W2 0.90

    67.5

    5

    50.2

    7

    54.5

    9

    32.9

    9

    67.5

    5

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    11/16

    b Surcharge angleEarth side Face A Outer side face

    mm F@ mm F `

    @ c/c

    m

    mm F@

    mm F@ c/c

    mm F@

    mm F@ c/c

    mm FN.S.L. @

    mm F mm F

    @ c/c @

    Heel Toe

    Reinforcement Detail Reinforcemen

    Foundation level

    mm F mm F@ c/c @ c/c `

    12

    8

    310

    C/C

    0.20

    Outer sideEarth side Face

    360

    C/C

    C/C

    8

    300 12

    4.00H=

    170

    3.70

    8

    8

    160

    12

    90

    1.9

    4

    2.5

    8

    12

    210 C/C

    8

    160 C/C

    200

    300

    310

    200

    8

    170120

    180

    9001200

    1000

    300

    10

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    12/16

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    13/16

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    14/16

    M-10 M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

    (N/mm2) Kg/m2

    (N/mm2) Kg/m2

    M 10 3.0 300 2.5 250

    M 15 5.0 500 4.0 400

    M 20 7.0 700 5.0 500

    M 25 8.5 850 6.0 600

    M 30 10.0 1000 8.0 800

    M 35 11.5 1150 9.0 900

    M 40 13.0 1300 10.0 1000

    M 45 14.5 1450 11.0 1100M 50 16.0 1600 12.0 1200

    M-10 M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

    Grade of concrete M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

    Modular Ratio 18.67 13.33 10.98 9.33 8.11 7.18

    scbc N/mm2 5 7 8.5 10 11.5 13m scbc 93.33 93.33 93.33 93.33 93.33 93.33

    kc 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

    jc 0.867 0.867 0.867 0.867 0.867 0.867

    Rc 0.867 1.214 1.474 1.734 1.994 2.254

    Pc (%) 0.714 1 1.214 1.429 1.643 1.857

    kc 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329 0.329

    jc 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89

    Rc 0.732 1.025 1.244 1.464 1.684 1.903

    Pc (%) 0.433 0.606 0.736 0.866 0.997 1.127

    kc 0.289 0.289 0.289 0.289 0.289 0.289

    jc 0.904 0.904 0.904 0.904 0.904 0.904Rc 0.653 0.914 1.11 1.306 1.502 1.698

    Pc (%) 0.314 0.44 0.534 0.628 0.722 0.816

    kc 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.253

    jc 0.916 0.916 0.916 0.914 0.916 0.916

    Rc 0.579 0.811 0.985 1.159 1.332 1.506

    Pc (%) 0.23 0.322 0.391 0.46 0.53 0.599

    (d) sst =275

    N/mm2

    (Fe 500)

    (c ) sst =

    230N/mm2

    (Fe 415)

    (b) sst =190

    N/mm2

    Table 2.1. VALUES OF DESIGN CONSTANTS

    (a) sst =140

    N/mm2

    (Fe 250)

    Grade of concrete

    Modular ratio m31

    (31.11)

    19

    (18.67)

    13

    (13.33)

    11

    (10.98)

    9

    (9.33)

    8

    (8.11)

    7

    (7.18)

    1.4 140

    Table 1.18. MODULAR RATIO

    1.1 110

    1.2 120

    1.3 130

    0.8 80

    0.9 90

    1.0 100

    2.8 3.2

    -- --

    0.6 60

    4.4

    Grade of

    concrete

    Permission stress in compression (N/mm2) Permissible stress in bond (Average) for

    plain bars in tention (N/mm2)Bending acbc Direct (acc)

    (N/mm2) in kg/m2

    Table 1.15. PERMISSIBLE DIRECT TENSILE STRESS

    Table 1.16.. Permissible stress in concrete (IS : 456-2000)

    Grade of concrete

    Tensile stress N/mm2 1.2 2.0 3.6 4.0

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    15/16

    M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40 < %

    0.15 % 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 %

    0.25 % 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 %

    0.50 % 0.29 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 %

    0.75 % 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.37 0.38 %

    1.00 % 0.37 0.39 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.42 %

    1.25 % 0.40 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.45 0.46 %

    1.50 % 0.42 0.45 0.46 0.48 0.49 0.49 %

    1.75 % 0.44 0.47 0.49 0.50 0.52 0.52 %

    2.00 % 0.44 0.49 0.51 0.53 0.54 0.55 %

    2.25 % 0.44 0.51 0.53 0.55 0.56 0.57 %

    2.50 % 0.44 0.51 0.55 0.57 0.58 0.60 %

    2.75 % 0.44 0.51 0.56 0.58 0.60 0.62

    3.00 and above % 0.44 0.51 0.57 0.6 0.62 0.63

    300 or more 275 250 225 200 175 50 or less

    1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30

    M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40

    1.6 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.5

    Grade of concrete M-10 M-15 M-20 M-25 M-30 M-35 M-40 M-45 M-50

    tbd (N / mm2) -- 0.6 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

    tbd (N / mm2) tbd (N / mm2)

    M 15

    M 20

    M 25

    M 30

    M 35

    M 40M 45

    M 50

    100As

    bd

    Table 3.4. Permissible Bond stress Table bd in concrete (IS : 456-2000)

    1.4 25 2.24 26

    1.3 27 2.081.2 29 1.92 30

    28

    331.1 32 1.76

    40

    1 35 1.6 36

    0.9 39 1.44

    60

    0.8 44 1.28 45

    0.6 58 0.96

    Grade of concrete

    tc.max

    Table 3.5. Development Length in tension

    Grade of

    concrete

    Plain M.S. Bars H.Y.S.D. Bars

    kd = LdF kd = LdF

    Table 3.3. Maximum shear stress tc.max in concrete (IS : 456-2000)

    Table 3.2. Facor k

    Over all depth of slab

    k

    Table 3.1. Permissible shear stress Table c in concrete (IS : 456-2000)

    Permissible shear stress in concrete tc N/mm2

  • 7/29/2019 Reatining WAll With SLOPING Bach Fill

    16/16

    Degree sin cos tan

    10 0.174 0.985 0.176

    15 0.259 0.966 0.268

    16 0.276 0.961 0.287

    17 0.292 0.956 0.306

    18 0.309 0.951 0.325

    19 0.326 0.946 0.344

    20 0.342 0.940 0.364

    21 0.358 0.934 0.384

    22 0.375 0.927 0.404

    23 0.391 0.921 0.424

    24 0.407 0.924 0.445

    25 0.422 0.906 0.466

    30 0.500 0.866 0.577

    35 0.573 0.819 0.700

    40 0.643 0.766 0.839

    45 0.707 0.707 1.000

    50 0.766 0.643 1.192

    55 0.819 0.574 1.428

    60 0.866 0.500 1.732

    65 0.906 0.423 2.145

    Value of angle