Upload
trinhnhan
View
237
Download
9
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Radio Access Techniques for LTE-Advanced
Radio Access Techniques for LTE-Advanced
Mamoru SawahashiMusashi Institute of Technology / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
August 20, 2008
Mamoru SawahashiMusashi Institute of Technology / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
August 20, 2008
Outline of Rel-8 LTE (Long-Term Evolution)Targets for IMT-AdvancedRequirements for LTE-AdvancedRadio access techniques for LTE-Advanced
Outline of Rel-8 LTE (Long-Term Evolution)Targets for IMT-AdvancedRequirements for LTE-AdvancedRadio access techniques for LTE-Advanced
2
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Outline of Rel-8 LTE (Long-Term Evolution)– Evolved UTRA and UTRAN –
Outline of Rel-8 LTE (Long-Term Evolution)– Evolved UTRA and UTRAN –
3
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
2004Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2005Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2006Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2007Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2008Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Study ItemWork Item3GPP TSG meeting3GPP TSG meeting
Sep. – Dec. 2008Completion of test specifications
Sep. – Dec. 2008Completion of test specifications
June 2005Requirements specified
June 2005Requirements specifiedNov. 2004
LTE WorkshopNov. 2004LTE Workshop
Dec. 2004Start SI discussion
Dec. 2004Start SI discussion June 2006
Start WI discussionJune 2006Start WI discussion
History of Standardization Activities on Rel-8 LTE
Sep. – Dec. 2007Completion of major specifications
Sep. – Dec. 2007Completion of major specifications
4
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Requirements for Evolved UTRA and UTRAN
Spectrum• Support of scalable bandwidths, i.e., 1.4, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20
MHzPacket-switching (PS) mode only
• VoIP capability in PS domainLatency
• Short C-plane latency (transition time)- Idle to active: Less than 100 msec- Dormant to active: Less than 50 msec
• U-plane latency- Latency in RAN is less than 5 msec one way
Peak data rate• DL: 100 Mbps, UL: 50 Mbps
User throughput (relative to Rel-6 HSDPA, HSUPA) • Cell edge user throughput: 2 – 3 times (DL), 2 – 3 times (UL)• Average user throughput: 3 – 4 times (DL), 2 – 3 times (UL)
Spectrum efficiency (relative to Rel-6 HSDPA, HSUPA)• 3 – 4 times (DL), 2 – 3 times (UL)
5
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Short sub-frame lengthAdopted 1-msec sub-frame length to achieve short round trip delay (RTD)
Common frame structure between FDD and TDDInserted cyclic prefix (CP) at each FFT block to avoid inter-block interference both in DL and ULDefined sub-frame with long CP and smaller number of symbols to provide MBMS (Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service) with single-frequency network (SFN) in DL
Frame Structure in Evolved UTRA
Slot 1 Slot 2 Slot 3 Slot 4 Slot 19 Slot 20
Radio frame = 10 msec1 sub-frame = 2 slots = 1 msec Transmission Time Interval (TTI)1 slot = 0.5 msec
Symbol 1 Symbol 2 Symbol 7Effective dataCP
Copy
6
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Carrier frequency IMT bandMultiple access scheme
UL SC (Single-Carrier)–FDMADL OFDMA
Transmission bandwidth 1.4, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20 MHzSub-frame length 1 msecSub-carrier spacing 15 kHzCyclic prefix length Short 4.7 μsec
Long 16.7 μsecModulation scheme QPSK, 16QAM, 64QAM*
* Optional in ULChannel coding Turbo codingMulti-antenna 1-by-2, 2-by-2 (4-by-2), 4-by-4 MIMO
Major Radio Link Parameters
7
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
OFDM-Based Downlink Radio Access
Robust against multipath interference (MPI)Flexibly accommodates different spectrum arrangementsHigh affinity to advanced techniques
• Frequency domain channel-dependent scheduling• MIMO multiplexing/diversity• High quality reception using soft combining for MBMS signal
Frequency
Localized transmission
Distributed transmission
(Different colors represent different users)
Time
Sub-frame
Resource block (RB)
8
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Coded datasymbol
Transmitsignal
DFT
IFFT
Sub-
carr
ier
map
ping
DFT-Spread OFDM
Single-Carrier-Based Uplink Radio Access
Resource blockFreq.
Time
Sub- frame
Frequency hopping
Frequency scheduling
Contiguous resource units are assigned to UE to maintain the single-carrier property
Add
ition
of C
P
Single-carrier based FDMA access in uplink • Low PAPR (Peak-to-average power ratio) achieves wide area
coverage using limited transmission power• Localized and/or distributed FDMA establishes intra-cell
orthogonality in frequency domain• Employs frequency domain equalizer with cyclic prefix to suppress
MPI ** D. Falconer, et al., “Frequency domain equalizer for single-carrier broadband wireless access,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 58 – 66, Apr. 2002.
9
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.Inter-Node B (cell) synchronization• Radio interface supports inter-Node B asynchronous mode as
baseline• Utilize merits of synchronized operation for MBMS with SFN and
inter-cell interference coordination (ICIC), etc.Support of scalable transmission bandwidths
• 1.4, 3.0, 5, 10, 15, 20 MHzSupport of packet based radio access only
• Simple protocol architecture using shared channel• Support VoIP capability
Cell search: Process to search for best cell with minimum path loss• SCH (Synchronization Channel) and Physical BCH (Broadcast
Channel) structures supporting unified cell search in scalable transmission bandwidth from 1.4 to 20 MHz
• Hierarchical SCH structureReference signal (RS): Used for channel estimation and channel-quality measurement
• Orthogonal RSs between transmitter antennas in MIMOApplication of essential techniques for packet radio access
• Frequency domain scheduling, AMC, Hybrid ARQ, Transmission power control, RACH, etc.
Major Radio Access Features in Rel-8 LTE (1)
10
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Efficient control signal structure• PBCH (Physical BCH) signal with time diversity• DL L1 /L2 control signals: PCFICH, PHICH, PDCCH• UL L1/L2 control signals: PUCCH using intra-TTI frequency
hoppingApplication of MIMO channel transmission
• Baseline is 2-by-2 MIMO in DL and 1-by-2 SIMO in UL • Single-user MIMO and multiuser MIMO (multiuser MIMO only in
UL)Shorter delay (latency)
• Reduce transmission and connection delays• Achieve short control delay and interruption time during handover
Short TTI, Simplified RRC procedure, Simple RRC statesHigh-quality MBMS (Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service)
• Synchronous transmissions from multiple cell sites and soft- combining reception at a UE in SFN using OFDM
Simple channel structures • Decrease number of physical and transport channels• Simple mapping between channels belonging to different layers
Major Radio Access Features in Rel-8 LTE (2)
11
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Targets for IMT-AdvancedTargets for IMT-Advanced
12
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Recommendation ITU-R M.1645Framework and overall objectives for the future development ofIMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000
New capabilities for Systems Beyond IMT-2000
Systems Beyond IMT-2000 will encompass the capabilities of previous systems
Peak Useful Data Rate (Mb/s)
IMT-2000
Mobility
Low
High
1 10 100 1000
New Mobile Access
New Nomadic / LocalArea Wireless Access
EnhancedIMT-2000
Enhancement.
Dashed line indicates that the exact data rates associated with Systems Beyond are not yet determined
Illustration of capabilities for IMT-2000 and systems beyond IMT-2000
4GLTE(Super 3G)
100 Mbps100 Mbps100 Mbps
1 Gbps1 Gbps1 Gbps
IMT-ADVANCED
Targets for IMT-Advanced
13
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
SDOs
etc.
Submission of candidate RIT
3GPP RAN
LTE CR phase
#38 #39 #40 #41 #42 #43 #44 #45 #46 #47 #48 #49
WS 2nd WS
Work ItemStudy ItemLTE-Advanced
Technicalspecifications
2009 2010 20112007 2008ITU-R WP5D
meetingsNo.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 No.5 No.6 No.7 No.8 No.9 No.10
ProposalsEvaluation
ConsensusSpecification
WRC-07Circular Letter to invite proposals
Spectrum identified
Spectrum identified
Circular Letter
Circular Letter
Approved Study Item in 3GPPApproved Study Item in 3GPP
In 3GPP, LTE-Advanced is regarded as IMT-AdvancedDOCOMO continues to contribute to IMT-Advanced
In 3GPP, LTE-Advanced is regarded as IMT-AdvancedDOCOMO continues to contribute to IMT-Advanced
Now
Schedule for IMT-Advanced
14
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Requirements for LTE-AdvancedRequirements for LTE-Advanced
15
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
LTE-Advanced should be real broadband wireless networks that provide peak data rates equal to or greater than those for wired networks, i.e., FTTH (Fiber To The Home), while maintaining equivalent QoSRequires complete backward compatibility, i.e., full support of Rel-8 LTE and its enhancement in LTE-Advanced High-level requirements
• Reduced network cost (cost per bit)• Better service provisioning• Compatibility with 3GPP systems
High-Level Requirements for LTE-Advanced
Minimum requirement for LTE-Advanced is to meet or exceed IMT-Advanced requirements within ITU-R time planFurthermore, LTE-Advanced targets performance higher than that for Rel-8 LTE in order to satisfy future user demand and to be a competitive mobile communications system
16
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Full support of Rel-8 LTE and its enhancement within the same spectrum
Basically same radio parameters and multi-access schemes
Lower latencies in C-plane and U-plane compared to those in Rel-8 LTEImprove system performance
• Peak spectrum efficiency • Capacity (average spectrum efficiency) • Cell edge user throughput • VoIP capacity Higher capacity than in Rel-8 LTE• Mobility Improve system performance in low mobility
up to 10 km/h• Coverage Equal or wider coverage than in Rel-8 LTE
Radio Access Requirements
17
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Peak data rate- Need higher peak data rates in LTE-Advanced than those for LTE
in order to satisfy future traffic demands
Peak spectrum efficiency- Must reduce bit cost per Hertz and improve user throughput
particularly in local areas- Higher peak spectrum efficiency is beneficial to achieving higher
peak data rate with limited available transmission bandwidth
Performance Requirements (1)
LTE (Rel-8) LTE-AdvancedDL 300 Mbps 1 GbpsUL 75 Mbps 500 Mbps
LTE (Rel-8) LTE-AdvancedDL 15 bps/Hz
(4 streams)30 bps/Hz
(8 streams)UL 3.75 bps/Hz
(1 stream)15 bps/Hz
(4 streams)
x3.3
x6.6
x2.0
x4.0
• Wider transmission bandwidth• Higher-order MIMO
• Higher-order MIMO etc.
18
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.Capacity (Average spectrum efficiency)- Need higher capacity to reduce further network cost per bit
Cell edge user throughput- Need higher cell edge user throughput compared to that for LTE to provide
better services
Performance Requirements (2)
LTE (Rel-8) LTE-AdvancedDL 1.69 bps/Hz/cell
(2-by-2 MIMO)3.7 bps/Hz/cell(4-by-4 MIMO)
UL 0.735 bps/Hz/cell(1-by-2 SIMO)
2.0 bps/Hz/cell(2-by-4 MIMO)
LTE (Rel-8) LTE-AdvancedDL 0.05 bps/Hz/cell
(2-by-2 MIMO)0.12 bps/Hz/cell(4-by-4 MIMO)
UL 0.028 bps/Hz/cell(1-by-2 SIMO)
0.07 bps/Hz/cell(2-by-4 MIMO)
* Target values are for Case 1 scenario in 3GPP, which is similar to Base Coverage Urban scenario in IMT.EVAL
x2.2
x2.7
x2.4
x2.5
• Wider transmission bandwidth• OFDM in uplink• Higher-order MIMO• Multi-cell transmission/reception• Advanced receiver
• Higher-order MIMO• Multi-cell transmission/reception• Advanced receiver
Expect to satisfy these target values by- increasing number of Rx antennas (approximately 1.5 times)- increasing number of Tx antennas (approximately 1.1 times)- employing other new/enhanced techniques (approximately 1.4 – 1.6 times)
19
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Radio Access Techniques for LTE-Advanced
Radio Access Techniques for LTE-Advanced
20
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Proposed radio access techniques for LTE-Advanced1. Asymmetric wider transmission bandwidth2. Layered OFDMA multi-access3. Advanced multi-cell transmission/reception techniques4. Enhanced multi-antenna transmission techniques5. Enhanced techniques to extend coverage area
Proposed Techniques for LTE-Advanced
21
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Asymmetric Wider Transmission BandwidthAsymmetric Wider Transmission Bandwidth
22
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.Require wider transmission bandwidth near 100 MHz to reduce bit cost per Hertz and to achieve peak data rate higher than 1 GbpsContinuous and discontinuous spectrum allocations
• Continuous spectrum usage
Can simplify eNB and UE configuration Possible frequency allocation in new band, e.g., 3.4 – 3.8 GHz bandIn this case, the same sub-carrier separation should be maintained over the entire system bandwidth Simple UE with single FFT
• Discontinuous spectrum usage Requires spectrum aggregation UE has multiple RF receivers and multiple FFTsHence, UE capability for supportable spectrum aggregation should be specified so that increases in UE size, cost, and power consumption are minimized
Support of Wider Bandwidth
Frequency
Aggregated bandwidth
Frequency
LTE bandwidth
23
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Asymmetric transmission bandwidth• Required bandwidth in uplink will be much narrower than that in downlink
considering current and future traffic demands in cellular networks• In FDD, asymmetric transmission bandwidth eases pair band assignment• In TDD, narrower transmission bandwidth is beneficial in uplink, since an
excessively wider transmission bandwidth degrades accuracies of channel estimation and CQI (Channel Quality Indicator) estimationPropose asymmetric transmission bandwidth in both FDD and TDD
(e.g., near 100 MHz in DL and near 40 MHz in UL)
UL bandwidth
TTI
Transmitted from different UEs
DL bandwidth
DL bandwidthUL bandwidth
FDD TDD
TimeTTI
Frequency
Asymmetric Transmission Bandwidth
24
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Layered OFDMA Multi-accessLayered OFDMA Multi-access
25
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.Requirements for multi-access scheme• Support of transmission bandwidth wider than 20 MHz, i.e., near
100 MHz, to achieve peak data rate requirements, e.g., higher than 1 Gbps
• Coexist with Rel-8 LTE in the same system bandwidth as LTE- Advanced
• Optimize tradeoff between achievable performance and control signaling overhead
Obtain sufficient frequency diversity gain when transmission bandwidth is approximately 20 MHz Control signaling overhead increases according to increase in transmission bandwidth
• Efficient support of scalable bandwidth to accommodate various spectrum allocations
Propose Layered OFDMA radio access scheme in LTE-AdvancedLayered transmission bandwidthSupport of layered environmentsLayered control signal formats
Layered OFDMA
26
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Layered Transmission Bandwidth (1)Layered transmission bandwidths
• Layered structure comprising multiple basic frequency blocksEntire system bandwidth comprises multiple basic frequency blocksBandwidth of basic frequency block is, e.g., 15 – 20 MHz
• Principle of UE access methodLTE-A UE with different capability and Rel.8-LTE UE can camp at any basic frequency block(s)
Our concept was adopted in agreements at RAN WG1#53bis as carrier aggregation comprising two or more component carriers (corresponding basic frequency block)
Frequency
System bandwidth, e.g., 100 MHz
Basic bandwidth, e.g., 20 MHz
UE capabilities• 100-MHz case
• 40-MHz case
• 20-MHz case (Rel-8 LTE)
Center frequency on UMTS raster(on DC sub-carrier, SCH, and PBCH)
27
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Layered transmission bandwidthsCenter frequency of each component carrier (basic frequency block) should be located on 100-kHz UMTS channel rasterSynchronization Channel (SCH) and Physical Broadcast Channel (PBCH) are transmitted from all component carriers
Rel-8 LTE UE can camp at any component carriers in LTE-Advanced frequency band
• For continuous spectrum usage, reduce number of sub-carriers based on bandwidths defined in Rel-8 LTE or insert sub-carriers between component carriers to satisfy the two conditions
Basic frequency block
Subframe SCHPBCH
SCHPBCH
SCHPBCH
SCHPBCH
SCHPBCH
100-kHz channel raster Frequency
Layered Transmission Bandwidth (2)
28
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Support of Layered Environments
Support of layered environments• Achieves highest data rate (user throughput) or widest coverage
according to respective radio environments such as macro, micro, indoor, and hotspot cells and required QoS
• MIMO channel transmission (MIMO multiplexing/MIMO diversity) with high gain should be used particularly in local areasAdaptive multi-access control according to radio environment
Macro layer
Micro layer
Indoor/hotspotlayer
Adaptive radioaccess control
29
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
UL Hybrid Radio Access Scheme (1)
Propose SC/MC hybrid radio access, i.e., to introduce OFDM in addition to DFT-Spread OFDM in uplinkIntroduction of OFDM as complement to DFT-Spread OFDM is
under discussion in RAN WG1 meeting• Universal switching of SC/MC based access using frequency
domain multiplexing/de-multiplexing
DFT
IFFT CPinsertion
Coded data symbols
Switch
SC generation
MC generation
Pulse- shaping
filter
S/P
Sub- carrier
mapping
30
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
UL Hybrid Radio Access Scheme (2)Merits of SC/MC hybrid radio access in uplink
• High gain in user throughputOFDM has higher robustness against MPI than DFT-Spread OFDM
OFDM provides higher user throughput than DFT-Spread OFDM when MIMO transmission is employedRadio interface should be designed to support any kind of receiver OFDM provides much higher gain in MLD-based signal detection than SIC etc.
• Flexibility of resource assignmentSC-FDMA with DFT-Spread OFDM provides inefficient resource assignment when wideband transmission UE is assigned (e.g., PUCCH is transmitted in the middle of transmission bandwidth)Requires more flexible resource assignment using non-
contiguous RB allocationBasic bandwidth, e.g., 20 MHz
Frequency
L1/L2 control channel region PUCCH
UE with wider bandwidth capability
31
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.One deployment scenario to introduce SC/MC hybrid radio accessPerformance improvement
• Optimization of PAPR (coverage) and achievable peak data rate according to inter-site distance, cell structure, and QoS requirements
• High affinity to UL MIMO transmissionReduction in number of implementation options
• Fewer options for implementation and testingReduce variations in UE categories
UL Hybrid Radio Access Scheme (3)
Transmission bandwidth of less than 20 MHz
Transmission bandwidth wider than 20 MHz
One stream(rank 1)
• Clustered DFT-Spread OFDMAdd clustered function to
Rel-8 LTE
• Clustered DFT-Spread OFDMAdd clustered function to
Rel-8 LTETwo
streams(rank 2)
• OFDMAdd OFDM function
(and/or)• Clustered DFT-Spread OFDM
Add clustered function to Rel-8 LTE
• OFDMAdd OFDM function
32
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Layered Control Signal Formats (1)
Propose layered L1/L2 control signal formats
• Achieve high commonality with control signal formats in Rel-8 LTE
• Use layered L1/L2 control signal formats according to assigned transmission bandwidth to achieve efficient control signal transmission for LTE-Advanced
Straightforward extension of L1/L2 control signal format of Rel-8 LTE to LTE-Advanced
• Independent control channel structure for each component carrier
• Control channel supports only shared channel belonging to the same component carrier
Frequency
Examples of layered multiplexing of L1/L2 control signals
FrequencyBasic bandwidth, e.g., 20 MHz
UE (LTE-A)UE (Rel-8 LTE)
UE (LTE-A)
Subf
ram
e
L1/L2 control channel region
33
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Layered Control Signal Formats (2)
Interleaver structure for layered control signal formatsRequire new interleaver / mapping scheme to support layered L1/L2 control signal structure
• Control Channel Elements (CCEs) for Rel-8 LTE are mapped to one component carrier
• CCEs for LTE-A are mapped to multiple component carriers
Sub-blockinterleaver
Sub-blockinterleaver
Sub-blockinterleaver
Sub-blockinterleaver
CCEs for LTE-A
CCEs for Rel-8 LTE
CCEs for Rel-8 LTE
CCEs for Rel-8 LTE
CCEs for Rel-8 LTE
Interleaver between basic frequency block
Frequency
Time Basic frequency block
34
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Advanced Multi-cell Transmission/Reception Techniques
Advanced Multi-cell Transmission/Reception Techniques
35
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.Use of advanced multi-cell transmission/reception techniques
• Use advanced multi-cell transmission/reception, i.e., coordinated multipoint transmission/reception, to increase frequency efficiency and cell edge user throughput
• Proposed techniques –Fast inter-cell interference (ICI) management (i.e., inter-cell interference coordination (ICIC)) aiming at inter-cell orthogonalization Fast handover at different cell sites
Use cell structure employing sets of remote radio equipment (RREs) more actively in addition to cell structure employing independent eNB
• RREs are beneficial to both ICI management and fast handover
Advanced Multi-cell Transmission/Reception Techniques
Optical fiber
RREseNB
36
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
W-CDMA LTE (Rel-8) LTE-AdvancedIntra-Cell Site
DL (Partially) orthogonal Orthogonal Orthogonal
UL Non-orthogonal Orthogonal OrthogonalInter-Cell Site
DL Non-orthogonal Non-orthogonal (Quasi)-orthogonalUL Non-orthogonal Non-orthogonal (Quasi)-orthogonal
One-cell frequency reuse• Baseline is one-cell frequency reuse to achieve high system
capacityIntra-cell orthogonalization
• Achieves intra-cell orthogonal multi-access (multiplexing) in both links as well as in Rel-8 LTEInter-cell orthogonalization
• Although ICIC is adopted in Rel-8 LTE, it only introduces fractional frequency reuse at cell edge with slow control speed using control signals via backhaul
• Inter-cell orthogonality will be established in LTE-Advanced to achieve high frequency efficiency and high data rate at cell edge
Inter-cell Orthogonalization
37
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Achieve inter-cell orthogonality through fast inter-cell interference (ICI) management
• Centralized control: ICI management among RRE cells using scheduling at central eNB
Achieves complete inter-cell orthogonality• Autonomous control (similar to Rel-8 LTE method): ICI management
among independent eNBs using control signals via backhaul and/or air
Achieves inter-cell quasi-orthogonality through faster control compared to Rel-8 LTE to achieve fractional frequency reuse at cell edge
Fast Radio Resource Management for Inter-cell Orthogonalization
Centralized ICI control
Autonomous ICI control
Optical fiber
RREs
38
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Centralized control using remote radio equipment (RRE)DL
• Fast cell selection (FCS) in L1UL
• Multicell reception (MCR) with diversity combining at central eNB
Autonomous control among independent eNBsDL
• Faster cell selection than that for Rel-8 LTE, i.e., as fast as possible, in L1 using bicast/forwarding in L2/L3UL
• Simultaneous reception at multiple cells or faster cell selection than that for Rel-8 LTE
Enhanced Macro Diversity and ICI Management Schemes to Achieve Inter-cell Orthogonalization
Optical fiber
eNBRRE
RREUE
Centralized control
eNB
UE
eNB
eNB
Autonomous control
39
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Enhanced Multi-antenna Transmission Techniques
Enhanced Multi-antenna Transmission Techniques
40
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Necessity of higher-order MIMO channel transmissionsTraffic demand in the era of LTE-Advanced
• Requires higher peak frequency efficiency than that for Rel-8 LTE to satisfy the increased traffic demand in LTE-Advanced era
Increased number of antennas directly contributes to achieving higher peak spectrum efficiency
Local area optimization• Since LTE-Advanced will focus on local area, higher peak frequency
efficiency also contributes to increase in average frequency efficiency
• Higher-order MIMO is more practical in local areas
Benefits of Higher-Order MIMO
41
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.User throughput is significantly improved according to the increase in the number of transmitter and receiver antennas, i.e., more effective than increasing modulation levelProposals for the number of supported antennas
All Rel-8 LTE MIMO channel techniques should be enhanced and applied to LTE-Advanced
• MIMO transmission mode control according to different requirements/targets
• Adaptive rank control according to channel conditions• Adaptive rate control through modulation and coding rates• Codebook based precoding
Number of Antennas Considered for LTE-Advanced
LTE (Rel-8) LTE-AdvancedDL Baseline: 2-by-2 MIMO
Max: 4-by-4 MIMOBaselines: 2-by-2, 4-by-2, and 4-by-4 according to UE categories and eNB types (optimization condition is FFS)Max: 8-by-8 MIMO
UL Baseline: 1-by-2 SIMO Baselines: 2-by-2 and 2-by-4 according to eNB typesMax: 4-by-4(8) MIMO
42
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Enhanced Techniques to Extend Coverage AreaEnhanced Techniques to Extend Coverage Area
43
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
RREs using optical fiber (“sector” belonging to the same eNB)• Effective in implementation of small size of eNB• Should be used in LTE-Advanced as effective technique to extend
cell coverage
Enhanced Techniques to Extend Coverage (1)
eNBUERRE
44
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Relays using radio• L1 relays with non-regenerative transmission, i.e., repeaters
Use the same (or different) frequency/time resourcesRepeaters are effective in improving coverage in existing cellsSince delay is shorter than cyclic prefix duration, no distinct additional change to radio interface is necessaryShould be used as well as in 2G/3G networks
Enhanced Techniques to Extend Coverage (2)
Interference and noise
Amplifier
eNB Repeater UE
45
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Relays using radio• L2 and L3 relays
Use different frequency/time resourcesL2 and L3 relays can achieve wide coverage extension via increase in SNRProblems to be solved are efficient radio resource assignment to signals to/from relay station, and long delay due to relay, etc.
Enhanced Techniques to Extend Coverage (3)
Decoding Re-encoding Amplifier
Relay UEeNB
46
August 20, 2008 / NTT DOCOMO, INC.Rel-8 LTE• Commercial equipment is under development
Targets for LTE-Advanced• Minimum requirement is to meet or exceed ITU-R requirements
within ITU-R time plan• LTE-Advanced targets higher performance than that for Rel-8 LTE
Proposed radio access techniques for LTE-Advanced• Asymmetric wider transmission bandwidth to reduce network cost
per bit and to achieve required peak data rate• Layered OFDMA using layered physical channel structure with
adaptive multi-access control to support layered environments and to achieve high commonality with Rel-8 LTE
• Advanced multi-cell transmission/reception techniques with inter- cell orthogonalization and fast handover
• Enhanced multi-antenna transmission techniques including higher- order MIMO channel transmission using larger number of antennas
• Efficient modulation/detection and coding techniques• Enhanced techniques to extend coverage area such as RREs and
relays using radio including repeaters
Conclusion