12
PROJECT MEMBERS PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR VADLA DANIEL WENDIN DANIEL WENDIN PRINCIPALS PRINCIPALS SVENSKA BOSTÄDER SVENSKA BOSTÄDER NCC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT NCC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPAL PARTNER PRINCIPAL PARTNER NETCOORD NETCOORD PROJECT COACH PROJECT COACH PAWEL WIATR PAWEL WIATR

PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

PROJECT MEMBERSPROJECT MEMBERS

DANIEL GUSTAVSSONDANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSONCECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSONFREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLAPAVAN KUMAR VADLA DANIEL WENDINDANIEL WENDIN

PRINCIPALSPRINCIPALS SVENSKA BOSTÄDERSVENSKA BOSTÄDER NCC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTNCC PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT

PRINCIPAL PARTNERPRINCIPAL PARTNER NETCOORDNETCOORD

PROJECT COACHPROJECT COACH PAWEL WIATRPAWEL WIATR

Page 2: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

CONTENTSCONTENTS

BackgroundBackgroundGoalsGoalsApproach to projectApproach to projectIdentification of servicesIdentification of servicesGeneral modelGeneral modelConclusions Conclusions Problems facedProblems facedFurther tasks Further tasks SummarySummary

Page 3: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

BACKGROUNDBACKGROUND

Different companies providing different services Different companies providing different services on different networkson different networks

No common communication standardNo common communication standard

High costs to lay the networksHigh costs to lay the networks

Lock-in effects Lock-in effects

Difficult to adopt new servicesDifficult to adopt new services

Problematical to manage the networks remotelyProblematical to manage the networks remotely

Page 4: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

GOALSGOALS

Identify which services that could be Identify which services that could be accommodated on a single IP-based networkaccommodated on a single IP-based network

Make a technical specification and calculation Make a technical specification and calculation of the requirements for such a networkof the requirements for such a network

Calculate the cost for the network, based on Calculate the cost for the network, based on the whole life-cycle for the networkthe whole life-cycle for the network

Page 5: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

APPROACH TO PROJECTAPPROACH TO PROJECT

Field studies and meetingsField studies and meetings

Contacting companies and institutionsContacting companies and institutions

Reading material of previous work within the Reading material of previous work within the fieldfield

Web researchWeb research

Page 6: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

IDENTIFICATION OF IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICESSERVICES

Building automation - management & controlBuilding automation - management & control ~~ Ventilation, heating, air conditioning Ventilation, heating, air conditioning ~ Individual measurement of electricity and water~ Individual measurement of electricity and water ~ Lighting~ Lighting ~~ Fire and security systems Fire and security systems ~ Access control~ Access control

Computer communicationComputer communicationTelephonyTelephonyTelevisionTelevisionBulletin systemsBulletin systems

Page 7: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

GENERAL MODEL -IGENERAL MODEL -I

Page 8: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

GENERAL MODEL - IIGENERAL MODEL - II

Page 9: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS

Non-availability of ideal/standard solutionNon-availability of ideal/standard solution

IP solutions for telephony and TV IP solutions for telephony and TV

IP solutions for building automation exist to IP solutions for building automation exist to some extentsome extent

~ Diversity of solutions~ Diversity of solutions

Unified solution by putting together separate Unified solution by putting together separate solutionssolutions

Page 10: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

PROBLEMS FACEDPROBLEMS FACED

Lack of IP-based productsLack of IP-based products

~ IP not always optimal solution~ IP not always optimal solution

~ Economical issues~ Economical issues

Regulative and insurance issuesRegulative and insurance issues

~ Separate cabling for fire and security ~ Separate cabling for fire and security

systemssystems

Page 11: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

FURTHER TASKSFURTHER TASKS

Collect some more informationCollect some more information

Analyze the information we haveAnalyze the information we have

~ Existing solutions – which is most feasible~ Existing solutions – which is most feasible

~ Which services are compatible ~ Which services are compatible

Evaluate limitations on IP-based products Evaluate limitations on IP-based products

Life-cycle cost analysisLife-cycle cost analysis

Page 12: PROJECT MEMBERS DANIEL GUSTAVSSON DANIEL GUSTAVSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON CECILIA HÅKANSSON FREDRIK MANNESSON FREDRIK MANNESSON PAVAN KUMAR VADLA PAVAN KUMAR

SUMMARYSUMMARY

IP-based solution possible to certain extentIP-based solution possible to certain extentBenefits of project Benefits of project

~ Easy accommodation of new services~ Easy accommodation of new services

~ Avoiding lock-in effects~ Avoiding lock-in effects ~ Making systems more flexible & ~ Making systems more flexible &

compatible with each other compatible with each other Challenges of projectChallenges of project

~ Lack of IP-based products~ Lack of IP-based products~ No ideal solution~ No ideal solution