31
PROJECT: 2283 STANDEN, CLITHEROE REPORT: 502 ARBORICULTURAL METHOD STATEMENT PREPARED BY TPM LANDSCAPE LTD FOR Taylor Wimpey Date: March 2017

Project: 2283 StANDeN, cLItHeroe rePort: 502 ...€¦ · rePort: 502 ArBorIcULtUrAL MetHoD StAteMeNt ... Further text narrative is provided in Section 6.0 ... Proposed Tree Planting

  • Upload
    ngoanh

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Project: 2283 StANDeN, cLItHeroe

rePort: 502 ArBorIcULtUrAL MetHoD StAteMeNt

PrePAreD BY tPM LANDScAPe LtD

For

taylor Wimpey

Date: March 2017

tPM LANDScAPe LtD

4thFloorStudio10 Little Lever Street

ManchesterM11HR

Tel: 0161 235 0600 Fax: 0161 235 0601

email: [email protected]

Project Number: 2283

Project reference: Standen, clitheroe

rev Issue Status Prepared / Date Approved / Date

- For Approval KD/ Mar 2017 ct/ Mar 2017

2283 STANDEN, CLITHEROE

coNteNtS

1.0 Introduction, Background and Purpose

2.0 Objectives

3.0 references

4.0 Analysis & Recommendations

4.1 Tree Survey Schedule Analysis

4.2 Conclusions and Recommendations

5.0 Arboricultural Impact Assessment

6.0 Arboricultural Method Statement

2283 STANDEN, CLITHEROE

Appendix

Appendix 1: Tree Retention, Removals and Protection (TPM)

Appendix 2: Tree Constraints Plan (TEP)

Appendix 3: Arboricultural Survey Data (TEP)

1.0 INtroDUctIoN 2.0 oBjectIveS

1

1.1

Written instructions were received from Taylor Wimpey for TPM Landscape to produce an Arboricultural Method Statement relating to Phase 1 of the proposed residential development off Pendle Road in Standen, Clitheroe.

The Arboricultural Method Statement will support the discharge of Condition 37 of the planning consent and once approved will provide guidance for the retention and protection of existing trees in relation to current guidelines BS 5837:2012 Trees in relation to Design, Demolition and Construction - Recommendations.

A Tree Constraints Plan was produced by TEP in August 2015 as appended to the back of this document:

• TEP - Tree Constraints Plan (Sheet 1 of 2), ref. ‘D5362.001’

• TEP - Tree Constraints Plan (Sheet 2 of 2), ref. ‘D5362.002’

• TEP - Arboricultural Suvey Data Sheets

Refer to TPM drawings:

• Tree Retention Plan (Sheet 1 of 2), ref ‘2283 101’

• Tree Retention Plan (Sheet 2 of 2), ref ‘2283 102’

Please see opposite page for the Site Location.

2283 STANDEN, CLITHEROE

Our client’s objective is to form a new residential layout, associated highway junction, areas of hard standing and landscaping.

Our Objectives are as follows:

1. Identify what arboricultural features exist presently within and adjacent to the site and to record and categorise them in line with BS5837:2012;

2. Identify what trees will need to be removed directly as a result of the proposed development of the site;

3. Identify any indirect impacts from the proposed development on trees proposed for retention;

4. Provide an indication of what protection measures should be implemented as part of the development of the site to ensure that the physical protection of the retain trees (both below and above ground);

5. Provide recommendations for mitigation in terms of new planting or enhancement for either landscape or ecological reasons.

2

AERIAL VIEW OF THE SITE

2283 STANDEN, CLITHEROE

Ref. Google Earth

PHASe 1

FUtUre PHASeS

3

2283 STANDEN, CLITHEROE

3.0 reFereNceS

BS 5837 2012: Trees in relation to Design, Demolition and Construction - Recommendations

BS 3998 2010: British Standard Recommendations for Tree Work

Arboricultural Association Guidance Notes No 7 – Tree Surveys: A Guide to Good Practice

ETR 2000: Tree Preservation Orders: A Guide to the Law and Good Practice

4.0 ANALYSIS AND recoMMeNDAtIoNS

5

4.1 tree Survey Schedule Analysis

Below is a summary of the existing trees located in Phase 1 of the development site. This is based on the Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets, produced by TEP. For more detailed information on individual trees please refer to the appended Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets for the wider scheme and Tree Constraints Plan for tree locations;

The trees are surveyed as a mixture of individual trees, groups and hedgerows reflecting the nature of the existing field boundaries where trees are generally located within or along hedgerows.

Individual trees are predominantly Ash species and of either A grade or B grade with some C grade categories recorded. There are no U grade category trees. They are generally of a good or fair condition. T168 and T169 are classed as veteran condition.

Hedgerows form the site boundaries and intersect from north to south, and, west to east. They are generally of a good condition and species include Blackthorn, Hawthorn and Elder.

Tree group species are made up of Common Ash, Common Alder and Elder. They are categorised as B or C grade and are generally of a good condition.

The most notable trees which are A grade are located towards the centre of the site and along existing hedgerows which meet in the centre of the site.

tree Summary for Phase 1 (as surveyed) Number

Tree Category

A B c U

total Number of Individual trees 31 13 12 6 0total Number of tree Groups 7 0 4 3 0Total Number of Hedgerows 9 - - - -

4.2 Conclusions and Recommendations

The vegetation across the site is concentrated to the existing hedgerows of the site. Hedgerows and notable A or B category trees should be considered for retention where possible within the development scheme.

Trees should be removed outside of the bird nesting season. No work will be carried out during the nesting season unless under the express supervision of a qualified ecologist.

5.0 ArBorIcULtUrAL IMPAct ASSeSSMeNt

13

Trees Requiring Removal due to Poor Health:

No trees as part of Phase 1 have been assessed as requiring immediate removal due to poor health or health and safety concerns.

Trees Requiring Removal to facilitate development:

The trees required for removal to facilitate the development are listed below:

Potential for Shading:

Properties along the southern boundary and to the north of trees located along the hedgerows throughout the centre of the site will experience some shading from retained mature trees and hedgerows. This will extend over back garden areas with only T166 and T165 likely to cause some shading of the properties themselves.

Boundary Screening:

Boundary vegetation is retained around the whole of the site other than part of G84 and sections of H25 and H29 which require removal to facilitate site access. The design proposals include for the introduction of a stone retaining wall to the entrance providing an appropriate boundary treatment.

Long Term Spatial Constraints:

The layout has been planned around the retention of as many trees of value as possible within the site and at its boundaries. The retention of these trees within the layout has been developed alongside the production of this report and a ‘Tree Retention Protection and Removal Plan’.

Existing Areas of Hard Standing:

G84 , T162, T163 and T177 currently has a large proportion of their RPA within hard standing formed by the existing layout of Pendle Road. The levels around these trees are to be retained and the proposed levels designed to accommodate.

Proposed Areas of Hard Standing:

The proposed layout and areas of proposed hard standing have been designed to avoid areas of root zone and any other clashes with retained trees and hedges. The access area might require some special measures due to level changes around this access point. This should be designed to reduce the amount of disturbance to the root zone areas to a minimum.

tree No / Group Potential (or indirect) impact

Sections of H23, H24, H25, H27, H29, H30Part of G85T169

will be removed to create vehicular and pedestrian circulation routes

Section of H25 will be removed to createaccess into the site and facilitate site lines

Part of G84 will be removed to facilitate sight lines from the site entrance

G83, T182 will be removed to facilitate the development

G86 Young tree group self-seeded in within barn ruins will be removed to facilitate the play area development

Location of Hard Surface / Tree Interface Potential Methodology to limit impacts on trees

G84, T162, T163 Potential clash with level changes to facilitate access entrance. Existing levels within RPA to be retained within proposals.

Location of Hard Surface / Tree Interface Potential Methodology to limit impacts on trees

G82, G85, T158, T170, T171, T172 Potential clash with level changes to facilitate footpaths and cycleways. A permeable, no dig solution surface to be proposed.

14

Proposed Buildings within the RPA:

All of the proposed buildings are currently outside of RPA’s

Proposed Drainage and Services:

The run of drainage and services is not yet known.

Working Space During the Construction Phase:

The tree protection proposals have allowed for working distances around protection fences allowing for construction to take place without the need to move protection measures. The exception to this may be around the entrance where some phasing of protection may be required.

requirements for an Arboricultural Method Statement:

Drawing 2283 101 and 2283 102 represents a plan based Tree Protection Plan and should be referred to during the construction phase for the purposes of controlling activity around the trees to be retained. Further text narrative is provided in Section 6.0 - Generic Arboricultural Method Statement.

Planning for New Landscaping:

New landscaping can contribute to the existing landscape setting and provide visual screening to adjoining neighbours to the north. There is opportunity to add new areas of tree and shrub planting.

Summary of Impacts

There are no trees requiring removal due to poor health and vigour. There are several trees and Groups that require removal or partial removal to facilitate the development proposals.

The development proposals have sought to minimise impacts on the existing RPA’s by positioning areas of hard standing outside of these zones to ensure that the trees remain in their current condition. Tree Protection measures should be implemented in accordance with drawings ref. ‘2283 101’ and ‘2283 102’.

Proposed Tree Planting to Compensate for the Loss of Trees/ Tree Groups

Tree No / Group requiring removal or removal of section

Partial Removal: H23, H24, H25, H27, H29, H30, G84, G85

Removal: G83, G86, T169, T182

Total No of Existing Trees/ Groups requiring removal

Total No of Existing Trees/ Groups requiring removal of a section

No of Proposed Native trees

4 8 160

6.0 ArBorIcULtUrAL MetHoD StAteMeNt

15

this method statement has been produced from current guidelines BS 5837:2012 Trees in relation to Design, Demolition and Construction - Recommendations. If in doubt on any issues relating to the retention and protection of the existing trees on site please contact TPM Landscape (project arboriculturalist) on 0161 235 0600 or the Tree Officer at Ribble Valley Council.

The appointed contractor should consider and follow this recommendations whilst working on the project. The appointed contractor must consult the project arboriculturalist who will oversee any critical operations close to the existing trees and make checks to ensure that the tree protection fence and working methods as described below are adhered to.

Tree Works

All tree works should be carried out by a qualified arboriculturalist prior to any construction works starting on site. Only carry out trees works which are shown on the planning approved drawing, any further works that need to be carried out require written approval from the local authority and should be advised by the project arboriculturalist.

Areas of scrub, bracken and bramble should be strimmed to 0.1m in Sept-October and the arisings removed to discourage hedgehogs and amphibians from settling in this area prior to heavy machinery entering the site and the full clearance works begin.

Tree works should be carried out outside of the bird nesting season (typically March-August) unless the trees and scrub has been surveyed by a qualified ecologist to look for active bird nests. If identified the area should be left undisturbed and fenced off (in line with ecologists recommendations) until the chicks have fledged.

Fence Installation

This method statement has been produced from current guidelines BS 5837:2012 Trees in relation to Design, Demolition and Construction - Recommendations. All trees as shown to be retained on the approved plan should be protected by a tree protection fence before any materials or machinery are brought onto the site, and before any demolition, development or stripping of topsoil commences. Please refer to drawing 2283 101 and 2283 102 for location of fencing and Figures 1 + 2 in Section 8.0 for the specification of the Tree Protection Fence. All-weather notices should be attached to the barrier with words such as: ‘’TREE PROTECTION AREA KEEP OUT’’, please refer to Figure 4 in Section 8.0 for an example of signage.

It should be confirmed by the project arboriculturalist, and, if requested in the planning conditions, by the tree officer at Ribble Valley Borough Council that the barriers and ground protection have been correctly set out on site, prior to the commencement of any operations.

The protected area should be regarded as sacrosanct, and, once installed barriers (unless identified on the drawing) should not be removed or altered without prior approval by the project arboriculturalist and/or Ribble Valley Council.

Fires on sites should be avoided if possible where there are existing trees. Where they are unavoidable, they should not be lit in a position where heat could affect foliage or branches. The potential size of a fire and the wind direction should be taken into account when determining its location, and it should be attended at all times until safe enough to leave.

Any materials whose accidental spillage would cause damage to a tree should be stored and handled well away from the outer edge of its RPA.

Excavations within RPA

Where excavations works for foundations fall on the edge of the RPA then these should be carried out by a competent contractor with an understanding of trees. Any excavations close to trees should be carried out from within the main body of the site working in (and away) from the tree. Machinery should not encroach into the RPA and protected by the fencing.

For any trees which require excavations within the RPA then water the tree a few days before works are carried out, making sure the ground is moist within the drip line of the tree (only required during the growing season).

Excavations can be carried out with a mechanical digger however these must be supervised by a grounds man to signal if tree roots >40mm are exposed. If roots are identified on site which encroach into the area to be excavated then these must be cut. Ensure cuts are done with hand tools that will make clean, quick cuts (i.e. chain saw or axe), at no points should roots be ripped or dragged out by a mechanical digger. Make sure cut roots are covered with loose soil or woodchips as soon as possible, DO NOT LEAVE CUT ROOTS EXPOSED. If roots are going to be exposed for more than an hour cover with a damp cloth. Water the tree again thoroughly when job is done (only required during the growing season).

16

Site Works - Pre Construction Of Development

Temporary roads, site storage and staff parking should be located outside of the RPA (within existing non compacted areas) and should only be implemented after the tree protection fencing has been erected.

Site Works - Post Construction

Tree protection fencing should only be pushed back or removed to allow for the installation of hard/ soft surfacing within the RPA once all major construction works have finished and heavy machinery has been removed off site. Refer to drawing 2283 101 and 2283 102for permanent and temporary fencing locations.

Areas of proposed surfacing over the RPA should be carried out to a ‘No Dig’ construction method inline with detailed construction details from an engineer.

Ground Protection

All ground protection methods must be capable of supporting construction traffic entering or using the site without causing ground compaction. There are two different ground protection measures that may be required depending on the site constraints and requirements.

Construction Traffic

It may be necessary to provide ground protection measures to facilitate construction traffic movement (exceeding 2t gross weight) and access to the proposed development. If this is the case, a proprietary system or pre-cast reinforced concrete slab to engineers specification will need to be designed to accommodate the likely loading.

Light Machinery/ Site Operatives

The most common method of ground protection is the use of a compressible layer as illustrated in figure 4 on the previous page. This method will support pedestrian-operated machinery up to a gross weight of 2t. It consists of a base geo-textile membrane, a base ground guard layer, approximately 150mm depth of woodchip and a surface ground guard track way.

If the construction works can be carried out by site operatives without the use of machinery, a single thickness scaffold board, either suspended to a scaffold frame or on top of a compression resistant layer and geo-textile membrane may be used.

Refer to TPM drawing 2283 101 and 2283 102 for temporary ground protection measures and locations.

other Notes

In addition to the protection fence the site operatives should have regard for the trees and make allowance for:

- All forms of access to the site

- Position of site compound

- Size of vehicles entering the site and any impacts to branches that overhang these routes

- Proposed parking for site personnel

- Phasing of works

- Space required to undertake the works

- Management of waste products within the site

- Any special construction techniques e.g. porous paving

- Time of year for any tree works (e.g. bird nesting season)

- Protection of soil structure within proposed planting beds

- Planting operations within the root protection area of retained trees

- Systems of arboricultural site monitoring / scheduled site visits

Figure 1

Figure 2

17

Figure 3 - example signage

Figure 4 - example of ground guards

Figure 5 - No-Dig Construction Details over RPA

NOTE: No-dig construction details as detailed by Geosynthetics

Detail 2 - Timber edging

Detail 1 - Concrete kerb edging

18

APPeNDIX

2283 STANDEN, CLITHEROE

Appendix 1: TPM Landscape - Tree Retention Plan (Sheet 1 of 2), ref. ’2283 101’

TPM Landscape - Tree Retention Plan (Sheet 2 of 2), ref. ’2283 102’

Pendle R

oad

T162

T163

T164

T165

T166

T167

T168

T169

T170

T171

T172

T173

T174

T175

T176

T177

T178

T179

T180

T181

T182

T183

T184

T185

G86

G85#

G87

H25

H26

H27

H28

H30

Estimated RPA based on

information available

Tree Protection Fence to be

re-aligned for path works.

Path to be constructed using

hand dig tools on a no dig solution.

Tree Protection Fence to be

re-aligned for path works.

Path to be constructed using

hand dig tools on a no dig solution.Tree removed due to

overlap with edge of

footway

Tree to be removed

to facilitate sight lines

from junction

Existing Tree to be RetainedTrees to be retained and protected in line withBS5837:2012. Please refer to Tree SurveyReport by TBA Landscape Architects. Refer toTPM drawing ref. '2283 102' for ArboriculturalMethod Statement.

Existing Tree to be RemovedFor condition and category grading ofindividual trees to be removed please referto Tree Survey Report by TBA LandscapeArchitects

Root Protection Area (RPA)RPA calculated inline with BS5837:2012

Proposed Tree Protection FenceTo be installed prior to any enabling works on siteand to remain in position during construction ofproposed building and landscape works. Pleaserefer to Arboricultural Method Statement andFigures on this drawing.

Proposed Tree Protection Fence (Re-alignment)Re-aligned protection fence to allow forexcavations within the existing RPA. See noteson drawing.

Tree Not Surveyed

Area within RPA that is existing soft landscapeand proposed to be hard landscapeSee notes on drawing. Care to be taken withexcavating the existing hard landscape to avoiddamage to roots. Area to be considered as ano-dig zone. Refer to no-dig construction detail.

Existing Hedgerow to be RetainedHedgerows to be retained and protected in linewith BS5837:2012. Please refer to Tree SurveyReport by TBA Landscape Architects and toArboricultural Method Statement by TPM.

Existing Hedgerow to be RemovedFor condition and category grading ofhedgerows to be removed please refer toTree Survey Report by TBA LandscapeArchitects

Scale @ A1

Status

Description

Drawing number

Drawn

Revision

Checked

Client

Project

2283

1:500

for approval

101

ct

E

ct

Tree Retention Removal Plan

Standen Clitheroe

Taylor Wimpey

address: 4th Floor Studio 10 Little Lever St Manchester M1 1HRtel: 0161 235 0600 fax 0601 email [email protected]

Date

11.04.16

Rev

C AS 12.10. 16Amended in line with updated layout.

By Description Date

Job number

N

GENERAL NOTES

1. This drawing is the copyright of tpm landscape Ltd and cannot be reproduced in any formwithout the consent of the company.

2. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with detail landscape drawings, details andspecification.

3. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all relevant Architects', Engineer's, Specialists, Billsof Quantities and Specifications.

4. The insertion of any firm or proprietary brand on this drawing is an indication of the class orquality required and does not exclude the use of alternative materials that are equal inperformance, quality and appearance, provided that they have been approved in writing by theLandscape Architect.

5. The Contractor is responsible for accurately ascertaining the position of underground servicesand responding to all relevant service easement requirements.

6. All dimensions are in millimetres unless stated otherwise, for the purposes of construction thisdrawing must not be scaled and only written dimensions used. Written and scaled dimensionsto be checked on site, any discrepancies reported prior to work commencing. IF IN DOUBTPLEASE ASK.

7. All work and materials are to be in accordance with the relevant British Standards and Code ofPractice.

8. All Proprietary products are to be used strictly in accordance with the manufacturer'sinstructions and details.

REVISION NOTES

D KD 17.11. 16Amended in line with comments from TW

E KD 26.01. 17Amended in line with comments from TW

LEGEND

Pendle R

oad

Pendle R

oad

T155#

T156#

T157#

T158

T159

T160

T161

T162

T163

T164

T165

T166

T167

T168

T169

T170

T171

T172

T173

T174

T175

T176

T177

T185

G84

G81#

G82

G85#

G87

H22

H23

H24

H25

H29

H30

G83

Estimated RPA based on

information available

Tree Protection Fence to be

re-aligned for path works.

Path to be constructed using

hand dig tools on a no dig solution.

Tree Protection Fence to be

re-aligned for path works.

Path to be constructed using

hand dig tools on a no dig solution.Tree removed due to

overlap with edge of

footway

Estimated RPA based on

information available

Tree to be removed

to facilitate sight lines

from junction

Existing Tree to be RetainedTrees to be retained and protected in line withBS5837:2012. Please refer to Tree SurveyReport by TBA Landscape Architects. Refer toTPM drawing ref. '2283 102' for ArboriculturalMethod Statement.

Existing Tree to be RemovedFor condition and category grading ofindividual trees to be removed please referto Tree Survey Report by TBA LandscapeArchitects

Root Protection Area (RPA)RPA calculated inline with BS5837:2012

Proposed Tree Protection FenceTo be installed prior to any enabling works on siteand to remain in position during construction ofproposed building and landscape works. Pleaserefer to Arboricultural Method Statement andFigures on this drawing.

Proposed Tree Protection Fence (Re-alignment)Re-aligned protection fence to allow forexcavations within the existing RPA. See noteson drawing.

Tree Not Surveyed

Area within RPA that is existing soft landscapeand proposed to be hard landscapeSee notes on drawing. Care to be taken withexcavating the existing hard landscape to avoiddamage to roots. Area to be considered as ano-dig zone. Refer to no-dig construction detail.

Existing Hedgerow to be RetainedHedgerows to be retained and protected in linewith BS5837:2012. Please refer to Tree SurveyReport by TBA Landscape Architects and toArboricultural Method Statement by TPM.

Existing Hedgerow to be RemovedFor condition and category grading ofhedgerows to be removed please refer toTree Survey Report by TBA LandscapeArchitects

Scale @ A1

Status

Description

Drawing number

Drawn

Revision

Checked

Client

Project

2283

1:500

for approval

102

ct

E

ct

Tree Retention Removal Plan

Standen Clitheroe

Taylor Wimpey

address: 4th Floor Studio 10 Little Lever St Manchester M1 1HRtel: 0161 235 0600 fax 0601 email [email protected]

Date

11.04.16

Rev

C AS 26.10 16Amended in line with updated layout.

By Description Date

Job number

N

GENERAL NOTES

1. This drawing is the copyright of tpm landscape Ltd and cannot be reproduced in any form withoutthe consent of the company.

2. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with detail landscape drawings, details and specification.

3. This drawing is to be read in conjunction with all relevant Architects', Engineer's, Specialists, Billsof Quantities and Specifications.

4. The insertion of any firm or proprietary brand on this drawing is an indication of the class orquality required and does not exclude the use of alternative materials that are equal inperformance, quality and appearance, provided that they have been approved in writing by theLandscape Architect.

5. The Contractor is responsible for accurately ascertaining the position of underground services andresponding to all relevant service easement requirements.

6. All dimensions are in millimetres unless stated otherwise, for the purposes of construction thisdrawing must not be scaled and only written dimensions used. Written and scaled dimensions tobe checked on site, any discrepancies reported prior to work commencing. IF IN DOUBT PLEASEASK.

7. All work and materials are to be in accordance with the relevant British Standards and Code ofPractice.

8. All Proprietary products are to be used strictly in accordance with the manufacturer's instructionsand details.

REVISION NOTES

D KD 17.11 16Amended in line with comments from TWE KD 26.01.17Amended in line with comments from TW

LEGEND

ARBORICULTURAL METHOD STATEMENT

This method statement has been produced from current guidelines BS5837:2012 Trees

in relation to design, demolition and construction recommendations.

If in doubt on any issues relating to the retention and protection of the existing trees on

site please contact TBA Landscape Architects (project arboriculturist) or the Tree Officer

at Ribble Valley Borough Council.

The appointed contractor should consider and follow the following recommendations

whilst working on the project. The appointed contractor must consult the project

arboriculturalist who will oversee any critical operations close to the existing trees and

make checks to ensure that the tree protection fence and working methods as described

below are adhered to.

TREE WORKS

All tree works should be carried out by a qualified arboriculturalist prior to any

construction works starting on site. Only carry out trees works which are shown on the

planning approved drawing, any further works that need to be carried out require written

approval from the local authority and should be advised by the project arboriculturalist.

Areas of scrub, bracken and bramble should be strimmed to 0.1m in Sept-October and

the arisings removed to discourage hedgehogs and amphibians from settling in this area

prior to heavy machinery entering the site and the full clearance works begin.

Tree works should be carried out outside of the bird nesting season (typically

March-August) unless the trees and scrub has been surveyed by a qualified ecologist to

look for active bird nests. If identified the area should be left undisturbed and fenced off

(inline with ecologists recommendations) until the chicks have fledged.

FENCE INSTALLATION

This method statement has been produced from current guidelines BS5837:2012 Trees

in relation to design, demolition and construction recommendations.

All trees as shown to be retained on the approved plan should be protected by a tree

protection fence before any materials or machinery are brought onto the site, and before

any demolition, development or stripping of topsoil commences. Please refer to drawing

for location of fencing and Figures 1 + 2 for the specification of the Tree Protection

Fence. All-weather notices should be attached to the barrier with words such as: ''TREE

PROTECTION AREA KEEP OUT'', please refer to Figure 3 for an example of signage.

It should be confirmed by the project arboriculturalist and if requested in the planning

conditions the tree officer at Ribble Valley Borough Council that the barriers and ground

protection have been correctly set out on site, prior to the commencement of any

operations.

The protected area should be regarded as sacrosanct, and, once installed barriers

(unless identified on the drawing) should not be removed or altered without prior approval

by the project arboriculturalist and/ or Ribble Valley Borough Council.

Fires on sites should be avoided if possible where there are existing trees. Where they

are unavoidable, they should not be lit in a position where heat could affect foliage or

branches. The potential size of a fire and the wind direction should be taken into account

when determining its location, and it should be attended at all times until safe enough to

leave.

Any materials whose accidental spillage would cause damage to a tree should be stored

and handled well away from the outer edge of its RPA.

SITE WORKS - PRE CONSTRUCTION OF DEVELOPMENT

Temporary roads, site storage and staff parking should be located outside of the RPA

and should only be implemented after the tree protection fence has been erected.

SITE WORKS - POST CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Tree protection fence should only be pushed back or removed to allow the installation of

hard surfacing within the RPA once all major construction works have finished and heavy

machinery has been removed off site.

Areas of proposed surfacing over the RPA should be carried out to a 'No Dig'

construction method inline with detailed construction details from an engineer. Surfacing

should be constructed over existing levels to avoid excavations within the main body of

the RPA. For parking bays/ vehicle carriageways over RPA these should be permeable

block paving to allow water and gasses to pass to the surface of the soil.

Fencing within RPA should be timber posts set in concrete. These post holes should be

dug by hand and should be located avoiding any major roots.

Brick walls within RPA should be constructed using a pile and beam foundation

construction instead of conventional strip foundation. Outside of RPA strip foundations

are acceptable.

Figure 3

Figure 2

Figure 1

APPeNDIX

2283 STANDEN, CLITHEROE

Appendix 2: TEP - Tree Constraints Plan (Sheet 1 of 2), ref. ‘D5362.001’

TEP - Tree Constraints Plan (Sheet 2 of 2), ref. ‘D5362.002’

NOTE: This drawing should be read in conjunction with

the respective Arboricultural Data Sheets (Appendix 1).

T1 Individual trees

G1 Groups of trees

*

#

Survey Boundary

W1 Woodland

Approximate location

(Feature not shown on topo)

H1 Hedgerow

Root Protection Area (RPA)

Statutory Protection

(Tree Preservation Order)

Category A

(High quality)

Category B

(Moderate quality)

Category C

(Low quality)

Category U

(Unsuitable for retention)

Tree Categorisation

(Tree quality assessment based on BS 5837:2012 Trees in relation

to design, demolition and construction - Recommendations)

KEY

[This drawing must be reproduced in colour]

T1T2*

T3*

T4

T5

T6#

T7

T8

T9

T10#

T11

T12

T13

T14

T15

T16

T17

T18

T19

T20

T21#

T22

T23

T24

T25

T26

T27

T28

T29

T30

T31

T32

T33

T34

T35

T36

T37

T38

T39

T40

T41

T42

T43

T44

T45

T46

T47

T48

T49

T50

T51

T52

T53

T54

T55

T56

T57

T58

T59

T60

T61

T62

T63

T64

T65

T66

T67

T68

T69

T70

T71

T72

T73

T74

T75#

T76#

T77

T78

T79

T80

T81

T82

T83

T84

T85

T86

T87

T88

T89

T90

T182

T183

T186

T187

T188

T189

T190

T191

T192

T193#

T194

T195

T196

T197

T198

T199

T200

T201

T202

T203

T204

T205

T206

T207

T208#

T209

T210

G96

G10

G1

G2

G3#

G5#

G6#

G19#

G12

G11

G20#

G21#

G22

G23#

G26

G25#

W1 #

W1#

G28

W2#

G32

G29

G30#

G31

G18

G17

G16

G13#

G14#

G15

G91

G90

G89

G88

G4#

G24

G7

G8#

G9#

G15

G27

G88

G87

G87

G92

G93

G94#

G95

G97

G98#

G99#

G100#

G101#

G102#

H1

H2

H3

H4

H5

H6

H7

H8

H27

H28

H29

H31

Higher Standen Farm

L

ittle

m

o

o

r R

o

a

d

Drwg No

Drawn

Scale

RMG KJO

1:1500 @ A1

D5362.001

Checked

Title

Drawing 1

Tree Constraints Plan - Sheet 1 of 2

[EXISTING]

Land at Higher Standen Farm, Clitheroe

Arboricultural Impact Assessment

JGS

15/09/15

Approved

Date

Genesis Centre

Birchwood Science Park Warrington

WA3 7BH

Tel 01925 844004

Fax 01925 844002

e-mail [email protected]

Project

DescriptionRev Drawn Approved Date

NOTE: This drawing should be read in conjunction with

the respective Arboricultural Data Sheets (Appendix 1).

T1 Individual trees

G1 Groups of trees

*

#

Survey Boundary

W1 Woodland

Approximate location

(Feature not shown on topo)

H1 Hedgerow

Root Protection Area (RPA)

Statutory Protection

(Tree Preservation Order)

Category A

(High quality)

Category B

(Moderate quality)

Category C

(Low quality)

Category U

(Unsuitable for retention)

Tree Categorisation

(Tree quality assessment based on BS 5837:2012 Trees in relation

to design, demolition and construction - Recommendations)

KEY

[This drawing must be reproduced in colour]

T85

T86

T87

T88

T89

T90

T91

T92

T93

T94

T95

T96

T97

T98

T99

T100

T101

T102

T103

T104

T105

T106

T107

T108

T109

T110

T111

T112

T113

T114

T115#

T116

T117

T118

T119

T120

T121

T122

T123

T124

T125

T126

T127

T128#

T129#

T130#

T131#

T132#

T133#

T134#

T135

T136

T137

T138

T139#

T140

T141

T142

T143#

T144#

T145#

T146

T147

T148

T149

T150#

T151

T152

T153

T154

T155#

T156#

T157#

T158

T159

T160

T161

T162

T163

T164

T165

T166

T167

T168

T169

T170

T171

T172

T173

T174

T175

T176

T177

T178

T179

T180

T181

T182

T183

T184

T185

T186

T187

T188

T189

T190

T191

T192

T193#

H16

W2#

W2#

G33

G34

G35

G65

G68#

G67

G66

G64

G63

G62

G60

G59

G53

G57

G55

G54

G44

G45

G51

G49

G47

G46

G70#

G72

G76

G71

G79

G78

G77

G84

G81#

G82

G41

G40

G38

G39#

G36

G32

G29

G30#

G31

G86

G85#

G83

G37

G43

G48

G50

G56

G52

G58

G61

G69

G42

G73

G74

G75

G80

G87

G88

H9

H9

H9

H10

H11

H12

H13

H14

H14

H15

H17

H18#

H19

H20

H21

H22

H23

H24

H25

H26

H27

H28

H29

H29

H30

Higher Standen Farm

A

5

9

A

5

9

P

e

n

d

l

e

R

o

a

d

P

e

n

d

l

e

R

o

a

d

P

e

n

d

l

e

R

o

a

d

Drwg No

Drawn

Scale

RMG KJO

1:1500 @ A1

D5362.002

Checked

Title

Drawing 2

Tree Constraints Plan - Sheet 2 of 2

[EXISTING]

Land at Higher Standen Farm, Clitheroe

Arboricultural Impact Assessment

JGS

15/09/15

Approved

Date

Genesis Centre

Birchwood Science Park Warrington

WA3 7BH

Tel 01925 844004

Fax 01925 844002

e-mail [email protected]

Project

DescriptionRev Drawn Approved Date

APPeNDIX

2283 STANDEN, CLITHEROE

Appendix 3: TEP - Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets for wider scheme at Standen, Clitheroe

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Surveyor RMG

Date 19.08.15 and 20.08.15

Town Clitheroe

Site Land at Higher Standen

Dwg Ref D5362.001-002

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

Trees

T1 Copper beech 13.0 420.0 1.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.0 3.0 N Middle Age Good A,1 5.0 79.8 Long

T2 Common beech 11.0 440.0 1.0 4.0 3.5 4.5 4.0 5.0 NE Middle Age Fair B,1 5.3 87.6 Medium *T3 Sycamore 7.0 400.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 N Middle Age Dead U 0.0 0.0 Short *T4 Common ash 19.0 990.0 1.0 7.0 6.0 12.0 9.0 6.0 SE Mature Good A,1 11.9 443.4 Long

T5 Common ash 18.0 800.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 W Mature Good A,1 9.6 289.5 Long

T6 English oak 10.0 410.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.5 4.5 4.0 E Middle Age Good B,1 4.9 76.0 Long

T7 English oak 8.0 620.0 1.0 4.5 3.0 4.5 3.5 4.0 NW Middle Age Fair C,1 7.4 173.9 Medium

T8 Wych elm 4.5 128.8 3.0 3.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.0 S Middle Age Poor U 0.0 0.0 Long

T9 English oak 13.0 920.0 1.0 9.0 7.0 6.5 7.5 3.0 W Mature Good A,1,2 11.0 382.9 Long

T10 Sycamore 7.0 344.4 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 1.0 N Middle Age Good C,1 4.1 53.7 Long

T11 English oak 11.0 670.0 1.0 7.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 E Middle Age Good B,1 8.0 203.1 Long

T12 English oak 16.0 1060.0 1.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 3.0 S Mature Good A,1 12.7 508.3 Long

T13 English oak 12.0 970.0 1.0 9.0 8.0 4.0 6.5 5.0 NE Mature Good B,1,3 11.6 425.7 Long

T14 English oak 12.0 630.0 1.0 8.5 7.0 3.5 7.0 4.0 NE Mature Good B,1 7.6 179.6 Long

T15 Field maple 12.0 670.0 1.0 4.0 4.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 NW Mature Veteran A,3 8.0 203.1 Long

T16 Sycamore 17.0 1270.0 1.0 8.0 10.0 8.5 7.0 2.0 N Mature Good A,1 15.0 707.0 Long

T17 Hawthorn 4.5 276.6 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 N Middle Age Good B,1 3.3 34.6 Long

T18 Common ash 9.0 420.0 1.0 5.0 4.0 5.5 5.0 3.5 SE Middle Age Good B,1 5.0 79.8 Long

T19 Sycamore 11.0 1200.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 W Mature Good A,1 14.4 651.4 Long

T20 Silver birch 6.0 280.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 2.5 S Middle Age Good B,1 3.4 35.5 Long

T21 Smooth

Japanese maple

3.5 138.2 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 S Middle Age Good C,1 1.7 8.6 Long

T22 Common ash 12.0 330.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 2.0 S Middle Age Good B,1 4.0 49.3 Long

T23 English oak 9.0 470.0 1.0 2.5 6.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 S Middle Age Good B,1 5.6 99.9 Long

T24 Common ash 12.0 630.0 1.0 4.5 4.0 5.0 4.5 6.0 W Middle Age Fair B,1 7.6 179.6 Long

T25 Common ash 17.0 1190.0 1.0 6.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 5.0 S Mature Good A,1,2 14.3 640.6 Long

T26 Common ash 15.0 1140.0 1.0 11.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 3.0 S Mature Veteran A,3 13.7 587.9 Long

T27 common ash 14.0 920.0 1.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 7.0 3.0 E Mature Fair B,3 11.0 382.9 Long

T28 English oak 14.0 890.0 1.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 4.5 4.0 NE Mature Good B,1 10.7 358.3 Long

T29 hawthorn 5.0 346.6 2.0 1.5 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 S Mature Dead U 0.0 0.0 Short

T30 Common ash 14.0 940.0 1.0 7.0 9.0 5.0 9.5 3.0 W Mature Fair B,1 11.3 399.7 Long

T31 Sycamore 6.0 340.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 2.5 3.0 W Middle Age Fair C,1 4.1 52.3 Medium

T32 Sycamore 15.0 870.0 1.0 9.0 7.0 9.0 7.0 3.0 E Mature Good A,1 10.4 342.4 Long

T33 Common ash 9.0 790.0 1.0 7.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 N Middle Age Fair B,1 9.5 282.3 Medium

T34 Common beech 9.0 540.0 1.0 2.0 5.5 2.0 3.0 2.0 SE Middle Age Good C,1 6.5 131.9 Long

T35 Common beech 13.0 900.0 1.0 3.0 6.5 6.5 2.0 5.0 SE Mature Good U 0.0 0.0 Short

T36 English oak 10.0 920.0 1.0 6.0 9.0 8.0 6.0 2.0 N Mature Good B,1 11.0 382.9 Long

T37 Common ash 12.0 290.0 1.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 4.0 S Middle Age Good C,1 3.5 38.0 Long

T38 Common ash 14.0 990.0 1.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 7.0 5.0 W Mature Good A,1,3 11.9 443.4 Long

T39 Common ash 10.0 353.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 6.0 5.0 1.5 S Middle Age Good B,1 4.2 56.4 Long

T40 Field maple 10.0 440.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 S Middle Age Good A,1 5.3 87.6 Long

T41 English oak 13.0 920.0 1.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 S Mature Good A,1 11.0 382.9 Long

T42 Common ash 15.0 603.8 3.0 7.0 5.0 7.0 3.0 5.0 N Mature Fair B,1 7.2 164.9 Long

T43 Common ash 13.0 670.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 6.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 8.0 203.1 Medium

T44 Common ash 7.0 590.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.0 W Middle Age Poor U 0.0 0.0 Short

TEP Ref: X5362.001 1 of 11 September 2015

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

T45 English oak 15.0 770.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 S Mature Fair B,1 9.2 268.2 Long

T46 Sycamore 14.0 520.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7.0 N Middle Age Good B,1 6.2 122.3 Long

T47 Common ash 13.0 780.0 1.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 3.0 5.0 S Middle Age Fair B,1 9.4 275.2 Long

T48 Common ash 14.0 700.0 1.0 5.0 9.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 S Mature Good B,1 8.4 221.7 Long

T49 Common ash 17.0 1000.0 1.0 8.0 9.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 S Mature Good B,1 12.0 452.4 Long

T50 Hawthorn 4.5 520.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.0 E Mature Poor U 0.0 0.0 Short

T51 English oak 14.0 930.0 1.0 6.5 7.0 8.5 7.0 2.0 NE Mature Good A,1 11.2 391.3 Long

T52 Common ash 13.0 670.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 W Mature Good B,1 8.0 203.1 Long

T53 Common ash 14.0 840.0 1.0 4.0 6.0 3.0 6.0 2.0 SE Mature Good B,1 10.1 319.2 Medium

T54 Hawthorn 4.5 330.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 S Mature Fair C,1 4.0 49.3 Medium

T55 Common ash 15.0 960.0 1.0 6.0 7.5 6.5 7.0 3.0 SW Mature Good A,1 11.5 416.9 Long

T56 Hawthorn 4.0 270.0 1.0 1.5 2.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 W Mature Fair C,1 3.2 33.0 Long

T57 Hawthorn 5.0 350.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 E Mature Fair C,1,3 4.2 55.4 Long

T58 English oak 17.0 970.0 1.0 6.0 7.0 6.5 7.0 3.5 NE Mature Good A,1 11.6 425.7 Long

T59 English oak 16.0 1070.0 1.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 2.5 N Mature Good A,1 12.8 517.9 Long

T60 Hawthorn 3.0 350.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 N Middle Age Good C,1 4.2 55.4 Long

T61 Hawthorn 3.5 405.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1,2 4.9 74.2 Long

T62 Hawthorn 3.5 198.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 2.4 17.8 Long

T63 Sycamore 11.0 990.0 1.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 6.0 2.0 SW Mature Poor C,1 11.9 443.4 Medium

T64 English oak 11.0 750.0 1.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 E Mature Good B,1 9.0 254.5 Long

T65 English oak 10.0 950.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 S Mature Dead U 0.0 0.0 Short

T66 English oak 15.0 1100.0 1.0 5.0 7.5 5.5 6.0 1.5 S Mature Dead U 0.0 0.0 Short

T67 Hawthorn 3.5 360.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 S Middle Age Fair C,1 4.3 58.6 Long

T68 Hawthorn 3.5 350.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 S Middle Age Fair C,1 4.2 55.4 Long

T69 English oak 12.0 820.0 1.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 S Mature Dead U 0.0 0.0 Short

T70 Common alder 10.0 440.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 W Middle Age Fair C,1 5.3 87.6 Long

T71 Sycamore 10.0 520.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 4.5 3.0 SE Middle Age Fair C,1 6.2 122.3 Long

T72 hawthorn 6.0 236.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 1.5 1.0 E Middle Age Poor U 0.0 0.0 Short

T73 Hawthorn 3.0 158.7 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 S Middle Age Good C,1 1.9 11.4 Long

T74 Hawthorn 4.5 201.2 5.0 2.0 2.5 3.5 2.0 0.5 E Middle Age Good C,1 2.4 18.3 Long

T75 Common beech 17.0 700.0 1.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 3.0 7.0 S Mature Poor U 0.0 0.0 Consider removal; permission

from landowner should be sought

Short

T76 Common ash 15.0 580.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 8.0 0.5 5.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 7.0 152.2 Consider removal; permission

from landowner should be sought

Medium

T77 Sycamore 11.0 670.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 8.0 203.1 Short

T78 Hawthorn 4.5 180.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 W Middle Age Poor U 0.0 0.0 Short

T79 Sycamore 9.0 370.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.5 2.5 3.0 SE Middle Age Poor U 0.0 0.0 Short

T80 Common ash 11.0 690.0 1.0 2.5 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 S Middle Age Poor U,1 0.0 0.0 Short

T81 Common ash 12.0 640.0 1.0 7.0 7.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 N Mature Fair B,1 7.7 185.3 Medium

T82 Sycamore 15.0 770.0 1.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 N Mature Fair B,1 9.2 268.2 Long

T83 English oak 9.0 570.0 1.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 2.0 N Middle Age Good B,1 6.8 147.0 Long

T84 English oak 8.0 420.0 1.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 5.0 79.8 Long

T85 Common ash 9.0 810.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.5 S Mature Veteran A,3 9.7 296.8 Long

T86 Common ash 14.0 830.0 1.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 4.0 4.0 E Mature Good A,1 10.0 311.7 Long

T87 Orchard apple

variety

1.0 50.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 S Young Poor C,1 0.6 1.1 Short

T88 Orchard apple

variety

2.5 55.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 N Young Good C,1 0.7 1.4 Medium

T89 Elder 3.0 168.0 4.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 2.0 12.8 Long

T90 English oak 3.0 127.3 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 N Young Good C,1 1.5 7.3 Long

T91 Common ash 12.0 900.0 1.0 8.0 11.0 9.0 10.0 4.0 SW Mature Good A,1 10.8 366.4 Long

TEP Ref: X5362.001 2 of 11 September 2015

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

T92 Common ash 9.0 570.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 N Middle Age Good B,1 6.8 147.0 Long

T93 Common ash 16.0 850.0 1.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 9.0 3.0 W Mature Good A,1 10.2 326.9 Long

T94 Common ash 17.0 850.0 1.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 11.0 3.0 W Mature Good B,1 10.2 326.9 Long

T95 Common beech 16.0 1080.0 1.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 11.0 3.0 E Mature Good A,1 13.0 527.7 Long

T96 Common ash 16.0 900.0 1.0 10.0 8.0 10.0 9.0 4.0 E Mature Good A,1 10.8 366.4 Long

T97 Common beech 7.0 360.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 4.3 58.6 Medium

T98 Common ash 15.0 900.0 1.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 3.0 N Mature Fair B,1 10.8 366.4 Long

T99 Common ash 13.0 550.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 N Middle Age Good B,1 6.6 136.8 Long

T100 Common ash 15.0 820.0 1.0 8.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 N Mature Good B,1 9.8 304.2 Long

T101 Common ash 14.0 650.0 1.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 3.0 N Middle Age Good B,1 7.8 191.1 Long

T102 Common ash 10.0 520.0 1.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 4.0 NE Middle Age Good B,1 6.2 122.3 Long

T103 Common ash 9.0 940.0 1.0 2.5 3.0 7.0 4.0 2.0 S Mature Fair C,3 11.3 399.7 Medium

T104 Common ash 13.0 830.0 1.0 6.0 5.0 8.0 6.0 3.0 S Mature Good A,1 10.0 311.7 Long

T105 Common ash 4.0 130.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 S Young Good C,1 1.6 7.6 Long

T106 Common ash 6.0 192.6 3.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 W Middle Age Good C,1 2.3 16.8 Long

T107 Common ash 10.0 490.0 1.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 3.0 N Middle Age Good B,1 5.9 108.6 Long

T108 Sycamore 7.0 134.5 3.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.0 S Young Good C,1 1.6 8.2 Long

T109 Common ash 6.0 270.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 NE Middle Age Good C,1 3.2 33.0 Long

T110 Common ash 6.0 194.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 S Middle Age Good C,1 2.3 17.1 Long

T111 Common ash 6.0 220.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 W Middle Age Good C,1 2.6 21.9 Long

T112 Common ash 7.5 303.5 4.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 3.0 1.0 W Middle Age Good C,1 3.6 41.7 Long

T113 Common ash 8.0 610.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.0 E Middle Age Good B,1 7.3 168.3 Long

T114 Common ash 9.0 720.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.5 1.5 4.0 S Middle Age Fair C,1 8.6 234.5 Medium

T115 English oak 5.0 600.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 S Middle Age Good B,1 7.2 162.9 Long

T116 Common ash 4.0 254.6 8.0 2.5 1.5 3.0 1.5 1.0 E Middle Age Good C,1 3.1 29.3 Medium

T117 Common ash 16.0 1110.0 1.0 8.5 9.0 9.0 8.0 5.0 NE Mature Good A,1 13.3 557.4 Long

T118 Common ash 17.0 780.0 1.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 7.5 6.0 W Mature Good A,1 9.4 275.2 Long

T119 Crab apple 5.0 520.0 1.0 3.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 S Mature Good A,1 6.2 122.3 Long

T120 Field maple 7.0 510.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 4.0 1.0 N Mature Fair B,1,3 6.1 117.7 Medium

T121 English oak 15.0 710.0 1.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 5.5 6.0 S Mature Good A,1 8.5 228.0 Long

T122 Common ash 5.0 232.7 6.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 S Middle Age Fair C,1 2.8 24.5 Long

T123 Common ash 8.0 92.2 2.0 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 N Young Good C,1 1.1 3.8 Long

T124 Sycamore 6.0 185.2 7.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 E Young Good C,1 2.2 15.5 Long

T125 Common holly 7.0 370.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 N Mature Fair B,1 4.4 61.9 Long

T126 Common alder 5.5 550.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NE Mature Fair B,1 6.6 136.8 Medium

T127 Common alder 10.0 820.0 1.0 4.5 5.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 SW Mature Good A,1 9.8 304.2 Long

T128 Common ash 9.0 396.2 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.5 5.0 1.0 E Middle Age Good B,2 4.8 71.0 Long

T129 Common ash 6.0 240.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 1.5 2.5 E Middle Age Good C,1 2.9 26.1 Long

T130 Sycamore 7.0 298.3 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 N Middle Age Good C,1 3.6 40.3 Long

T131 Common ash 8.0 310.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 S Middle Age Good B,1 3.7 43.5 Long

T132 Common ash 17.0 970.0 1.0 5.0 11.0 9.0 8.0 2.0 SW Mature Good A,1 11.6 425.7 Long

T133 Sycamore 4.0 135.9 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 E Young Fair C,1 1.6 8.4 Long

T134 Sycamore 8.0 360.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 W Middle Age Good B,1 4.3 58.6 Long

T135 Common ash 11.0 490.0 1.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 W Middle Age Fair B,1 5.9 108.6 Medium

T136 Common ash 18.0 1090.0 1.0 5.0 12.0 6.0 7.0 5.0 N Mature Good A,1 13.1 537.5 Long

T137 Common ash 18.0 880.0 1.0 4.5 7.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 N Mature Good A,1 10.6 350.3 Long

T138 Common ash 14.0 410.0 1.0 2.5 5.0 6.0 2.0 5.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 4.9 76.0 Long

T139 Common ash 15.0 470.0 1.0 3.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 E Middle Age Good B,1 5.6 99.9 Long

T140 Sycamore 21.0 1010.0 1.0 11.0 5.0 9.0 8.0 4.0 NW Mature Veteran A,1,2,3 12.1 461.5 Long

T141 Sycamore 22.0 1310.0 1.0 9.0 14.0 9.0 13.0 4.0 SE Mature Veteran A,1,2,3 15.0 707.0 Long

T142 Sycamore 8.0 390.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 SW Middle Age Good B,1 4.7 68.8 Long

T143 Common ash 13.0 770.0 1.0 5.0 6.0 6.5 6.0 4.0 NW Middle Age Good A,1 9.2 268.2 Long

T144 Common ash 17.0 980.0 1.0 8.0 8.5 6.5 7.0 3.0 W Mature Good A,1 11.8 434.5 Long

TEP Ref: X5362.001 3 of 11 September 2015

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

T145 Field maple 6.0 370.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 S Middle Age Good B,1 4.4 61.9 Long

T146 Common ash 15.0 990.0 1.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 7.0 5.0 W Mature Fair B,1,3 11.9 443.4 Long

T147 English oak 7.0 610.0 1.0 2.5 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 S Mature Poor C,1 7.3 168.3 Long

T148 Common ash 16.0 820.0 1.0 8.0 7.0 9.0 7.0 3.0 SW Mature Fair B,1,3 9.8 304.2 Long

T149 Common alder 6.0 650.0 1.0 4.0 4.5 3.5 4.0 1.0 W Mature Good B,3 7.8 191.1 Long

T150 Common ash 5.0 120.4 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 W Young Good C,1 1.4 6.6 Long

T151 Common ash 6.0 290.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.0 W Middle Age Good C,1 3.5 38.0 Long

T152 Common ash 6.0 310.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 S Middle Age Good C,1 3.7 43.5 Long

T153 Common ash 13.0 950.0 1.0 7.0 6.0 9.0 7.0 6.0 NE Mature Fair B,1 11.4 408.3 Sever ivy Long

T154 Common ash 15.0 860.0 1.0 7.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 4.0 S Mature Good A,1 10.3 334.6 Long

T155 Common ash 8.0 590.0 1.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 S Middle Age Good B,1 7.1 157.5 Long

T156 Common ash 8.0 930.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 S Mature Good B,1,3 11.2 391.3 Long

T157 Common ash 11.0 720.0 1.0 4.0 4.5 5.0 4.0 4.5 S Mature Fair B,1 8.6 234.5 Long

T158 Common ash 14.0 840.0 1.0 7.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 N Mature Good A,1 10.1 319.2 Long

T159 Common ash 13.0 610.0 1.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 4.5 2.0 S Middle Age Good B,1 7.3 168.3 Long

T160 Common ash 17.0 850.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 3.0 W Mature Good A,1 10.2 326.9 Long

T161 Common alder 6.0 230.0 1.0 3.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 2.8 23.9 Long

T162 Common ash 15.0 820.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 E Mature Good A,1 9.8 304.2 Long

T163 Common ash 13.0 650.0 1.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 W Mature Good B,1 7.8 191.1 Long

T164 Common ash 17.0 900.0 1.0 7.0 8.0 7.0 5.0 3.0 W Mature Good A,1 10.8 366.4 Long

T165 Common ash 15.0 810.0 1.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 6.0 4.0 W Mature Good A,1 9.7 296.8 Long

T166 Common ash 11.0 570.0 1.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 N Middle Age Good B,1 6.8 147.0 Long

T167 Common holly 5.0 155.9 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 W Young Good C,1 1.9 11.0 Long

T168 Common alder 15.0 990.0 1.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 9.0 5.0 W Mature Veteran A,3 11.9 443.4 Long

T169 Common alder 8.0 1050.0 1.0 5.0 5.5 4.0 5.0 2.0 S Mature Veteran A,3 12.6 498.8 Long

T170 English oak 8.0 820.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 2.5 S Mature Good B,3 9.8 304.2 Medium

T171 Common alder 8.0 610.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 S Middle Age Fair C,1 7.3 168.3 Long

T172 common alder 5.0 580.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 W Middle Age Fair C,1 7.0 152.2 Long

T173 Hawthorn 6.0 510.0 1.0 4.5 2.5 3.0 3.0 2.0 W Middle Age Good B,3 6.1 117.7 Long

T174 Common ash 19.0 1110.0 1.0 12.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 4.0 SW Mature Good A,1,2 13.3 557.4 Long

T175 Hawthorn 5.0 417.6 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 0.5 W Mature Fair B,3 5.0 78.9 Long

T176 Common ash 18.0 780.0 1.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 N Mature Good A,1 9.4 275.2 Long

T177 Common ash 8.0 280.0 1.0 2.5 1.5 2.0 2.0 3.0 N Middle Age Good C,1 3.4 35.5 Long

T178 Common ash 8.0 360.0 1.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.0 N Middle Age Good B,1 4.3 58.6 Long

T179 Common ash 14.0 820.0 1.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 4.0 E Mature Good A,1 9.8 304.2 Long

T180 Common ash 12.0 450.0 1.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 W Middle Age Good B,1 5.4 91.6 Long

T181 Common ash 14.0 760.0 1.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 5.0 W Mature Good A,1 9.1 261.3 Long

T182 Common ash 11.0 620.0 1.0 6.0 8.0 7.0 8.0 4.0 NW Middle Age Good B,1 7.4 173.9 Long

T183 Common ash 16.0 1010.0 1.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 9.0 4.0 W Mature Good A,1 12.1 461.5 Long

T184 Common alder 5.0 172.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 S Middle Age Fair C,1 2.1 13.4 Medium

T185 Common ash 14.0 970.0 1.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 S Mature Good A,1 11.6 425.7 Long

T186 English oak 13.0 830.0 1.0 5.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 2.5 S Mature Good A,1 10.0 311.7 Long

T187 English oak 10.0 810.0 1.0 1.5 9.0 2.5 4.0 6.0 S Mature Fair C,1,3 9.7 296.8 Medium

T188 English oak 7.0 760.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 5.0 1.5 2.5 SE Mature Fair C,1,3 9.1 261.3 Medium

T189 English oak 11.0 770.0 1.0 4.0 5.5 2.5 4.0 3.0 W Mature Fair C,1,3 9.2 268.2 Medium

T190 English oak 9.0 650.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 S Mature Poor U 0.0 0.0 Short

T191 English oak 9.0 750.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 S Mature Dead U 0.0 0.0 Short

T192 English oak 9.0 760.0 1.0 4.5 5.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 S Mature Good B,1 9.1 261.3 Long

T193 Common ash 8.0 280.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 E Middle Age Good C,1 3.4 35.5 Long

T194 Common ash 15.0 790.0 1.0 5.0 7.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 S Mature Fair B,1 9.5 282.3 Medium

T195 Common ash 12.0 405.3 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 S Middle Age Good B,1 4.9 74.3 Long

T196 Common ash 12.0 770.0 1.0 6.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 3.0 N Mature Good A,1 9.2 268.2 Long

T197 English oak 9.0 590.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 N Mature Fair B,1 7.1 157.5 Medium

TEP Ref: X5362.001 4 of 11 September 2015

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

T198 Common ash 10.0 500.9 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 S Middle Age Good B,1 6.0 113.5 Long

T199 Common ash 10.0 250.0 1.0 4.0 3.5 3.0 4.0 3.0 E Middle Age Good B,1 3.0 28.3 Long

T200 Common ash 11.0 260.0 1.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 3.1 30.6 Long

T201 Common ash 11.0 247.6 2.0 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 N Middle Age Fair C,1 3.0 27.7 Medium

T202 Common ash 16.0 970.0 1.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 4.0 W Mature Good A,1 11.6 425.7 Long

T203 English oak 11.0 530.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 W Middle Age Good B,1 6.4 127.1 Long

T204 Leyland cypress 11.0 446.0 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.0 S Middle Age Good B,1 5.4 90.0 Long

T205 Common ash 11.0 330.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.5 N Mature Good C,1 4.0 49.3 Long

T206 Common ash 16.0 1170.0 1.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 W Mature Good B,3 14.0 619.3 Long

T207 Common ash 13.0 670.0 1.0 4.0 6.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 S Mature Fair C,1 8.0 203.1 Long

T208 Common ash 9.0 312.1 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 1.0 S Middle Age Good C,1 3.7 44.1 Long

T209 Common alder 14.0 670.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.5 5.0 3.0 E Mature Good B,3 8.0 203.1 Long

T210 Silver birch 5.0 140.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.0 N Young Good C,1 1.7 8.9 Long

Groups

G1 Common beech;

common ash;

wild cherry;

rowan

to 8 to 270 17.0 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G2 Wych elm;

common ash

to 6 <100 7.0 Young Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G3 Blackthorn;

hawthorn

to 4 <100 c. 20 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G4 Common ash;

wych elm

to 6.5 <100 7.0 Young Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G5 Sycamore;

common ash

to 11 to 300 8.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G6 Sycamore;

common ash

to 8 <150 c. 20 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G7 Hawthorn;

common ash

5.0 <100 c. 8 Young Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G8 Copper beech;

silver birch

12.0 450 / 330 2.0 Middle Age Good B,1 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G9 Himalayan birch;

variegated hybrid

poplar; common

holly

to 6 <120 3.0 Young Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G10 Lawson's

cypress; crab

apple

to 4 <100 7.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G11 English oak to 18 to 850 2.0 Mature Good A,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G12 Common ash;

hawthorn;

sycamore

to 12 to 400 c. 50 Young to

Middle Age

Fair B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G13 Hawthorn to 4 to 190 6.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G14 Wych elm;

sycamore; hazel

to 6 to 200 7.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

TEP Ref: X5362.001 5 of 11 September 2015

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

G15 Elder; hawthorn;

common ash;

common alder;

hazel; dog rose;

sycamore;

English oak

to 9 to 280 c. 100 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,1,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G16 Common ash to 12 to 550 3.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G17 Common ash;

English oak;

Common alder

to 13 to 600 3.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G18 Sycamore;

Common ash;

English oak

to 13 to 550 4.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G19 Common beech;

common larch;

English oak

to 18 to 750 c. 50 Middle Age to

Mature

Good B,1,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G20 Common beech to 18 to 650 c. 20 Middle Age Poor U Refer to

Drawing

n/a Short

G21 Common beech;

sycamore;

English oak

to 17 to 600 c. 50 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G22 Hawthorn; elder to 4 <150 c. 10 Young Fair C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G23 Common ash;

English oak

to 14 to 750 3.0 Mature Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G24 Sycamore;

Common ash;

hawthorn

to 8 to 280 c. 10 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G25 Common ash;

English oak;

common alder;

sycamore

to 13 to 600 c. 40 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G26 Sycamore;

common ash;

English oak;

hawthorn

to 17 to 650 c. 20 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G27 hawthorn;

common ash;

sycamore; wych

elm

to 4 <150 c. 20 Young to

Middle Age

Fair C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G28 Common ash 13.0 to 600 4.0 Middle Age Fair B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G29 Common beech;

English oak

4.0 180 / 170 2.0 Young Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G30 Wych elm;

common ash;

sweet chestnut;

cherry laurel

to 9 to 210 c. 10 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G31 Orchard apple

variety

to 4 to 150 10.0 Young Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

TEP Ref: X5362.001 6 of 11 September 2015

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

G32 Common alder;

goat willow;

sycamore

to 6 to 400 c. 50 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G33 Common alder;

hawthorn;

common ash;

wild cherry

to 7 to 350 c. 20 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G34 Common ash;

hawthorn;

sycamore

to 9 to 400 c. 40 Mixed Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G35 hawthorn;

common ash

to 3 to 120 7.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G36 Common ash;

horse chestnut;

goat willow;

hawthorn

to 10 to 350 c.75 Mixed Age Good B,1,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G37 Hawthorn to 3 to 140 2.0 Middle Age Poor U Refer to

Drawing

n/a Short

G38 Hawthorn to 5 to 270 c. 20 Mature Fair C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G39 Hawthorn to 4 to 200 c. 75 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G40 Leyland cypress;

Lawson's

cypress; Spruce

species; copper

beech; rowan;

white willow

to 9 to 350 c. 20 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G41 Lawson's

cypress; Leyland

cypress; fir

species

to 10 to 450 c. 7 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G42 Common ash 6.0 to 140 c. 7 Young Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G43 Common ash 6.0 210 / 220 2.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G44 Common ash;

hawthorn; wych

elm; blackthorn

to 9 to 350 c. 25 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G45 Common ash to 10 to 380 7.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G46 Common ash to 8 to 200 c. 20 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G47 Hawthorn to 3 to 180 c. 8 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G48 Common ash;

common beech

to 11 310 to 790 4.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G49 Hawthorn to 7 to 330 c. 9 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G50 Hawthorn to 3.5 to 150 c. 15 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

TEP Ref: X5362.001 7 of 11 September 2015

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

G51 Hawthorn to 4 to 150 c. 30 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G52 Common ash to 5 to 160 3.0 Young Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G53 Common ash to 8 to 370 2.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G54 Common ash to 6 to 150 c.7 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G55 Common ash to 8 to 210 c. 10 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G56 Common ash;

common alder

to 12 to 690 3.0 Mature Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G57 Common ash to 15 to 710 3.0 Mature Good B,1,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G58 Hawthorn to 3.5 to 220 6.0 Middle Age Fair C,1 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G59 Common beech to 16 770 / 640 /

210

3.0 Middle Age to

Mature

Fair U Refer to

Drawing

n/a Short

G60 Hawthorn; alder to 4 to 250 7.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G61 Hawthorn to 4 to 230 11.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G62 Common beech to 17 300 to 900 4.0 Middle Age to

Mature

Fair B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Medium

G63 Common beech;

ash

to 16 to 600 c. 30 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G64 Common ash to 20 to 870 6.0 Middle Age to

Mature

Good A,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G65 Common beech;

hawthorn;

common ash

to 9 to 270 c. 40 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G66 Common ash 19.0 770 / 790 2.0 Mature Good A,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G67 Common ash to 9 to 350 c. 15 Young to

Middle Age

Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G68 Common ash to 7 to 220 c. 7 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G69 Common ash to 7 230 / 250 2.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G70 Common ash to 9 to 250 c. 10 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G71 Sycamore;

Common ash

to 12 to 350 c. 10 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G72 Common ash to 17 to 850 12.0 Mature Good A,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G73 Common ash to 16 to 870 3.0 Middle Age to

Mature

Good A,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G74 Common alder to 8 700 / 1100

/ 710 / 740

/ 690

5.0 Mature Good A,1,3 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G75 common ash to 9 to 250 6.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

TEP Ref: X5362.001 8 of 11 September 2015

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

G76 Sycamore;

common beech;

common ash;

common larch

to 21 to 1050 c. 40 Middle Age to

Mature

Good A,1,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G77 Goat willow;

hawthorn; elder;

common alder

to 7 to 200 c. 40 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G78 Common ash 11.0 520 / 650 2.0 Young to

Middle Age

Good B,1 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G79 Common alder 10.0 to 450 3.0 Middle Age Good C,1 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G80 Common ash 10.0 750 / 850 2.0 Mature Good A,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G81 Common ash to 9 to 600 3.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G82 Common ash to 10 320 / 550 2.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G83 Common alder;

common ash

to 6 220 / 290 2.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G84 Common ash to 14 600 to 750 3.0 Mature Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G85 Common alder;

common ash

7.0 200 / 200 2.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G86 Common ash;

elder

to 10 to 300 c. 10 Middle Age Good C,1,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G87 Common ash to 9 to 280 4.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G88 Hawthorn; hazel;

ash

to 5 to 350 n/a Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G89 Common ash to 8 to 180 3.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G90 Wild cherry;

common alder

to 7 to 250 2.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G91 Common ash;

sycamore

to 8 to 260 3.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G92 Common ash;

sycamore

to 12 to 400 c.20 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G93 Common ash;

common beech

to 10 to 270 3.0 Middle Age to

Mature

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G94 Common ash to 10 to 350 2.0 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G95 Silver birch;

common alder;

common beech;

Leyland cypress

to 10 to 250 c. 20 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G96 Common ash to 16 to 750 3.0 Middle Age to

Mature

Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G97 Silver birch;

hawthorn;

sycamore;

common ash

to 12 to 250 10.0 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G98 Common ash;

sycamore

to 8 to 200 c. 15 Young to

Middle Age

Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

TEP Ref: X5362.001 9 of 11 September 2015

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

G99 Common ash;

sycamore; wych

elm; purple plum

to 15 to 750 c. 8 Middle Age to

Mature

Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G100 Common beech to 7 to 180 c. 20 Middle Age Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G101 Common beech to 16 to 500 5.0 Middle Age Good B,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

G102 Purple plum;

blackthorn; crab

apple

to 4 to 150 c. 10 Young Good C,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

Hedges

H1 Leyland cypress;

hazel; blackthorn

3.5 Young to

Middle Age

Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H2 Hawthorn; elder;

common ash;

wych elm

1.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H3 Blackthorn; elder;

common ash

2.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H4 Hawthorn; privet 1.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H5 Leyland cypress 3.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H6 Blackthorn; elder;

common ash

2.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H7 Hawthorn 1.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H8 Hawthorn 1.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H9 Hawthorn;

blackthorn; elder

1.5 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H10 Hawthorn; elder 2.5 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H11 Blackthorn;

hawthorn

1.5 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H12 Hawthorn 1.5 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H13 hawthorn to 3 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H14 Hawthorn 3.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H15 Hawthorn to 3 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H16 Hawthorn 1.0 Middle Age Fair N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Medium

H17 Hawthorn to 4 Middle Age to

Mature

Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H18 Hawthorn;

blackthorn

1.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

TEP Ref: X5362.001 10 of 11 September 2015

APPENDIX 1: Arboricultural Survey Data Sheets

Ref Species Height Stem Dia.

No. of

stems/

individuals

Crown

Spread

North

Crown

Spread

South

Crown

Spread

East

Crown

Spread

West

Height of

Lowest

Branch

Direction

of Lowest

Branch

Maturity ConditionComments on form, condition,

health and significant defects

BS5837

Tree

Quality

Assess.

Radius of

RPA guide

circle

BS5837

RPA AreaManagement Recommendations

Estimated

Remaining

Contribution

TPO

(m) (mm)arising below

1.5m(m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)

Young,

Middle Age,

Mature

Good, Fair,

Poor,

Veteran

A,B,C,R

(1,2,3)(m) (m2)

Long, Medium,

Short(*)

H19 Blackthorn; hazel;

common ash;

hawthorn

to 5 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H20 Common ash;

hawthorn;

blackthorn; wych

elm

to 5 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H21 Hawthorn;

blackthorn; hazel;

common ash

1.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H72 Blackthorn;

hawthorn

1.5 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H23 Hawthorn;

blackthorn

1.5 to 1.5 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H24 Hawthorn 1.5 1.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H25 Hawthorn;

blackthorn; elder

2.0 to 1.5 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H26 Hawthorn; elder;

ash

2.5 2.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H27 Hawthorn;

blackthorn

1.5 to 1.5 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H28 Hawthorn; privet 1.0 1.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H29 Hawthorn;

blackthorn; elder;

hazel

2.0 to 2 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H30 Hawthorn; hazel 1.0 1.0 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

H31 Hawthorn 2.0 to 2 Middle Age Good N/A Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

Woods

W1 English oak;

common ash;

sycamore; wych

elm; hawthorn;

hazel; wild

cherry; common

beech

to 21 to 950 n/a Mixed Age Good A,1 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

W2 Common beech;

English oak;

sycamore;

hawthorn

to 20 to 970 n/a Mixed Age Good A,1,2 Refer to

Drawing

n/a Long

TEP Ref: X5362.001 11 of 11 September 2015