10
Preserving State Government Digital Information Minnesota Historical Society NDIIPP Meeting July 2008

Preserving State Government Digital Information

  • Upload
    ave

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Preserving State Government Digital Information. Minnesota Historical Society NDIIPP Meeting July 2008. Project Objectives. Identify, capture, preserve, and provide access to “at risk” digital content from state legislatures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Preserving State Government Digital Information

Preserving State GovernmentDigital Information

Minnesota Historical Society

NDIIPP Meeting

July 2008

Page 2: Preserving State Government Digital Information

Project Objectives

• Identify, capture, preserve, and provide access to “at risk” digital content from state legislatures

• Develop products to help other states assess capacity and adapt model

• Test the model in Minnesota

• Promote results through outreach and education

Page 3: Preserving State Government Digital Information

Project Partners

Project led by Minnesota Historical Society

– MN Office of the Revisor of Statutes– MN Legislative Reference Library– National Conference of State Legislatures– California Digital Library– CA State Archives, State Library, Legislative

Counsel– Other states: Illinois, Kansas, Vermont,

Mississippi, Tennessee

Page 4: Preserving State Government Digital Information

Collaboration

• Partner states: CA, KS, IL, VT, MS, TN

• Visits to each partner state to learn about their particular concerns

• Evaluation of gap between goals and capacity

• Meetings with interested groups and organizations

Page 5: Preserving State Government Digital Information

Partners: Analyzing Variables

• Audiences

• Mission

• Priorities

• Initiatives

• Capacity

• Resources

Page 6: Preserving State Government Digital Information

Issues Research

• Authentication of digital content• Accessibility requirements for online

content• Preservation options• Options for retrospective digitization• Records retention schedules• Survey of current legislative information

services/sites

Page 7: Preserving State Government Digital Information

Technology Research

• XML• APIs• RDF• Topic Maps• Google’s Sitemap Protocol

Spectrum of options from simple to complex based on infrastructure and technical skill requirements, cost, etc. – What is practical and appropriate?

Page 8: Preserving State Government Digital Information

Products in Development

White Papers:– Authentication– Access options (technologies)– Retrospective digitization– Records retention schedules for legislative

content– Preservation options

XML Schema– “Lowest common denominator” metadata

Page 9: Preserving State Government Digital Information

Next Steps

• Analyze results of first state partner meetings

• Continue issues research

• Evaluate of access technologies

• Develop cost-benefit analysis

• Start on Minnesota access pilot

• Hold all-partner meeting, St. Paul, 2009

• Revisit partner states, mid-2009

Page 10: Preserving State Government Digital Information

For More Information

Project Web Site:

www.mnhs.org/legislativerecords

Project Staff:Robert Horton Jennifer JonesProject Director Project Manager651.259.3240 [email protected]

[email protected]