Upload
ave
View
34
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Preserving State Government Digital Information. Minnesota Historical Society NDIIPP Meeting July 2008. Project Objectives. Identify, capture, preserve, and provide access to “at risk” digital content from state legislatures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Preserving State GovernmentDigital Information
Minnesota Historical Society
NDIIPP Meeting
July 2008
Project Objectives
• Identify, capture, preserve, and provide access to “at risk” digital content from state legislatures
• Develop products to help other states assess capacity and adapt model
• Test the model in Minnesota
• Promote results through outreach and education
Project Partners
Project led by Minnesota Historical Society
– MN Office of the Revisor of Statutes– MN Legislative Reference Library– National Conference of State Legislatures– California Digital Library– CA State Archives, State Library, Legislative
Counsel– Other states: Illinois, Kansas, Vermont,
Mississippi, Tennessee
Collaboration
• Partner states: CA, KS, IL, VT, MS, TN
• Visits to each partner state to learn about their particular concerns
• Evaluation of gap between goals and capacity
• Meetings with interested groups and organizations
Partners: Analyzing Variables
• Audiences
• Mission
• Priorities
• Initiatives
• Capacity
• Resources
Issues Research
• Authentication of digital content• Accessibility requirements for online
content• Preservation options• Options for retrospective digitization• Records retention schedules• Survey of current legislative information
services/sites
Technology Research
• XML• APIs• RDF• Topic Maps• Google’s Sitemap Protocol
Spectrum of options from simple to complex based on infrastructure and technical skill requirements, cost, etc. – What is practical and appropriate?
Products in Development
White Papers:– Authentication– Access options (technologies)– Retrospective digitization– Records retention schedules for legislative
content– Preservation options
XML Schema– “Lowest common denominator” metadata
Next Steps
• Analyze results of first state partner meetings
• Continue issues research
• Evaluate of access technologies
• Develop cost-benefit analysis
• Start on Minnesota access pilot
• Hold all-partner meeting, St. Paul, 2009
• Revisit partner states, mid-2009
For More Information
Project Web Site:
www.mnhs.org/legislativerecords
Project Staff:Robert Horton Jennifer JonesProject Director Project Manager651.259.3240 [email protected]