32
Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data North Carolina Partnerships Steve Morris Steve Morris NCSU Libraries NCSU Libraries Workshop on Archiving Digital Workshop on Archiving Digital Cartography and Geoinformation Cartography and Geoinformation December 4, 2008 December 4, 2008

Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

  • Upload
    dooley

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data. North Carolina Partnerships. Workshop on Archiving Digital Cartography and Geoinformation December 4, 2008. Steve Morris NCSU Libraries. NC Geospatial Data Archiving Project. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

North Carolina Partnerships

Steve MorrisSteve MorrisNCSU LibrariesNCSU Libraries

Workshop on Archiving Digital Workshop on Archiving Digital Cartography and GeoinformationCartography and GeoinformationDecember 4, 2008December 4, 2008

Page 2: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

One of eight initial collection building projects in the Library of Congress-funded NDIIPP (National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program)

Lead organizations: North Carolina State University Libraries and North Carolina Center for Geographic Information & Analysis (NCCGIA)

Focus: State and local government geospatial data in NC Repository development as catalyst for discussion Goal: Engage SDI in data archiving and preservation

Initial 3 year project extended to March 2009

NC Geospatial Data Archiving Project

Page 3: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Repository Goal Capture at-risk data Explore technical and organizational

challenges

Project End Goal Data Producers: Improved temporal data

management practices Archives: More efficient means of

acquiring and preserving data;

Progress towards best practices

Temporal data management vs. long-term preservation

NCGDAP Project Goals

Page 4: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Spatial Data Infrastructure Role in Archiving Metadata standards and outreach

metadata quality, best practices Inventories

Reduce “contact fatigue”, shareable info store Content exchange networks

Leverage more compelling business reasons to put data in motion

Automate process, add technical & administrative metadata

Framework data communities Snapshot frequency, schemas, format strategies

Page 5: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

NCGDAP Data Types – Digital Orthophotography

• All 100 NC counties with orthos• 1-5 flight years per county• 200-300 gb per flight

Page 6: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

NCGDAP Data Types – Vector Data

• Point, line, and polygon• Attached attribute data• Some layers frequently updated

Page 7: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

NCGDAP Data Types – Vector Data

• Cadastral (tax parcels) • Street centerlines• Zoning• Topographic contours• Public utilities• School, sheriff, fire• Voting precincts• More …

Frequent UpdateMore detailed, current, and accurate than state/federal data sources

Page 8: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Downtown Raleigh Near State Capitol

2005 Wake County Ortho

Imagery = DurableStatic Simple structureMostly open formats

Vector data = VolatileFrequent updateComplex structureMostly proprietary formats

Downtown Raleigh Near State Capitol

2005 Wake County Ortho

Imagery = DurableStatic Simple structureMostly open formats

Vector data = VolatileFrequent updateComplex structureMostly proprietary formats

Page 9: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Carrboro, NC : Population 17,797 (2005 est.)

24 downloadable GIS data layers

4 OGC WMS services (web services)

6 web mapping applications

9 downloadable PDF map layers

Page 10: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Value in Older Data: Cultural Heritage

Future uses of data are difficult to anticipate (as with Sanborn Maps)

Page 11: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Value in Older Data: Solving Business Problems

Suburban Development 1993/2002Near Mecklenburg County-Cabarrus County NC border

Land use change analysis

Real estate trends analysis

Site location analysis

Disaster response

Resolution of legal challenges Impervious surface maps

Page 12: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Industry focus on “latest and greatest” data Industry temporally-impaired from the point of view of

data availability, software support, etc. “Kill and fill” as a common approach to data

management (past versions of vector data lost)

Loss of memory about the data Of superceded county orthophoto flights in NC:

Only 22% recorded in the state’s GIS inventory Only 30% accessible through county map servers

Some older inventories only available through Internet Archive

Problem: Lack of Temporal Data

Page 13: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Complex vector formats: multi-file, multi-format No non-proprietary, well-supported format for vector data

Shift to web services-based access Data becoming more ephemeral

Often: Inadequate or nonexistent metadata Impedes discovery and use

Increasing use of spatial databases for data management The whole is greater than the sum of the parts but the whole is

very hard to preserve Content packaging

No geospatial industry standard

Temporal Challenges with Geospatial Data

Page 14: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Problem: Putting the Data in Motion

Most costly part of archive development is identifying, negotiating acquisition, and then transferring data

Local agency “contact fatigue” resulting from repeated state, federal, and university requests for data

Archive development is low priority – leverage other business uses that can put the data in motion

•Continuity of operations•Highway planning•Floodplain mapping

Objective• Minimize direct contacts• Document data• Clarify rights• Routinize transfer

Page 15: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Problem: Metadata

Survey of current archiving practice amongNC counties and municipalities

Metadata is often asynchronous, inconsistently structured, incomplete, or missing.

Metadata archived with data?

25%

9%

6%

60%

FGDC

Locally Defined

NC OneMap Starter Block

None

Page 16: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Problem: Content Packaging

XML DatabaseExport

XML DatabaseExport

TIFF Images •Pixel Value and Header file•World file•Coordinate System file•Metadata file

Shapefiles•Geometry file•Index file•Attribute file•Metadata file•Coordinate System file•Spatial Index files

Potential Ingest Objects

• Complex multi-file, multi-format objects

• Shared ancillary components

• Need to add administrative & technical metadata beyond geospatial metadata

Metadata Exchange Format (MEF) in GeoNetwork is a form of content packaging

Page 17: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Technical solutions: How do we preserve acquired content over the long term?

Cultural/Organizational solutions: How do we make the data more preservable—and more prone to be preserved—from point of production?

Current use and data sharing requirements – not archiving needs – are most likely to drive improved preservability of content and improvement of metadata

Different Ways to Approach Preservation

Page 18: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Preservation Approaches: Temporal Data Snapshots

Issue: How frequently should county and municipal vector data layers be captured in archives?

Parcels, centerlines, jurisdictions, zoning, …

Parcel Boundary Changes 2001-2004, North Raleigh, NC

Page 19: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

How often should continually changing vector datasets be captured?

Tap into data custodian understanding of production patterns and uses

Tap into local innovation Learn about local business drivers for data archiving

2006 and 2008 surveys of NC cities and counties 2008 survey of archival practice in state agencies in

NC Planned survey of data users in NC

http://www.nconemap.com/AboutNCOneMap/tabid/289/Default.aspx#preservation

NC Frequency of Data Capture Surveys

Page 20: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Preservation Approaches: Original Data vs. “Desiccated” Data

Complex data representations can be made more preservable (and less useful) through simplification

Page 21: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Complex documents may be very hard to preserve over time GIS project files Layer definitions Web services or API interactions

Image outputs capture some sense of final product--but lose underlying data intelligence

GeoMAPP Multistate project: Engagement with ESRI on complex project archiving issues

Capturing Complex and Ephemeral Data Representations

Page 22: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Desiccated data: PDF and GeoPDF

Counterpart to analog map = datasets plus data models, symbolization, classification, annotation, etc.

More data intelligence survives in PDF documents than survives in most other “desiccated” formats

Page 23: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Explosion of geospatial PDF content recently Standards issues

GeoPDF: formerly proprietary TerraGo technology now going through OGC standards process

PDF an open ISO standard Open PDF variants created through ISO

standards process (PDF/E, PDF/X, PDF/A, …) NCGDAP approach: PDF content retained in

addition to, NOT instead of original data

Geospatial PDF Trends

Page 24: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Changes in the Domain: New Location-Based Content

Present-day value in location-based services and mobile applications

Street ViewsOblique Imagery

3D Images

Page 25: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Changes in the Domain: New Location-Based Content

Future value as cultural heritage resource

More descriptive of place and function than spatial data

Ortho image

Page 26: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

GICC Archival and Long-Term Access Committee

Geo Multistate Archival and Preservation Partnership (GeoMAPP)

OGC Data Preservation Working Group

Moving Forward

Page 27: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Nov. 2007: NC Geographic Information Coordinating Council (GICC):

Ten Recommendations in Support of Geospatial Data Sharing released Recommendation: “Establish archive and long term

data access strategies” Suggested best practices include: “Establish a policy

and procedure for the provision of access to historic data, especially for framework data layers.”

Community Response to the Data Archiving Challenge

Page 28: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Initiated Feb. 2008 in response to agency requests for guidance on temporal data management

Federal, state, regional, and local agency representation Key focus

Best practices for data snapshots and retention State Archives processes: appraisal, selection, retention

schedules, etc. Who, What, Why, When, Where, How

Final Report delivered to GICC in November 2008

NC GICC Archival and Long-Term Access Committee

Page 29: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Lead organizations: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information & Analysis (NCCGIA), State Archives of NC, with Library of Congress

Partners: State geospatial organizations of Kentucky and Utah State Archives of Kentucky and Utah NCSU Libraries in catalytic/advisory role

State-to-state and geo-to-Archives collaboration 2 year project: Nov. 2007-Dec. 2009 Archives as part of Spatial Data Infrastructure

GeoMAPP: Geospatial Multistate Archival and Preservation Partnership

Page 30: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Formed Dec. 2006 Engage archival community Find points of intersection with other OGC activities:

GML for archiving Content packaging Large scale data transfers Time in decision support

OGC Data Preservation Working Group

Page 31: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

“Supporting temporal analysis requirements” gets more attention than “archiving and preservation”

Leverage existing infrastructure Current data sharing needs drive infrastructure

improvements that help archiving Leverage business needs that are more compelling than

preservation (e.g., continuity of operations) Facilitate stakeholder ownership of the solutions Mine state and local archiving innovations

Conclusions

Page 32: Preserving State and Local Government Digital Geospatial Data

Thank You!Contact:Steve Morris

Head, Digital Library Initiatives

North Carolina State University Libraries

Steven_Morris @ncsu.edu

NCGDAP:

http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/ncgdap

GeoMAPP

http://www.geomapp.com