Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
May31,2017
PharmaRepTrak®2017TheWorld’sMostReputablePharmaceu?calCompanies
2
TheWorld’sLeadingResearchandAdvisoryFirmforReputa?onFoundedin1997byDr.CharlesFombrunandDr.CeesvanRiel,wehelporganiza?onsanswertheques?ons:• Whatismyreputa?onandhowdoesitcompare?• HowcanIimproveit?• Whoisdoingitwell?
RepTrak®FrameworkWemeasurethereputa?onsofthousandsoftheworld’smostpres?giouscompaniesannuallyusingourRepTrak®framework–theworld’slargestandhighestqualitynorma?vereputa?ondatabase.
Con?nuousReputa?onMeasurement&GuidanceWeprovidecon?nuousreputa?onmeasurement,benchmarkingandconsul?ngservicestohundredsofthebest-knowncompaniesgloballytohelpthemprotecttheirreputa?ons,analyzerisksanddrivecompe??veadvantage.
Reputa?onManagementBestPrac?cesThroughourReputa?onLeadersNetwork,webringexecu?vesfrom100+globalmembercompaniestogethertoadvancetheprac?ceofreputa?onmanagementcollec?velyandfortheirorganiza?ons.
AboutReputa?onIns?tute
3
• Customersbuyyourproducts…
• Thegeneralpublicrecommendyourcompany…
• Policymakersandregulatorsgiveyoualicensetooperate…
• Thefinancialcommunityinvestinyou…
• Themediareportfavorablyonyourpointofview…
• Employeesdeliveronyourstrategy…
Reputa'onisanemo'onalbond… …thatensures
Thesuccessofyourcompanydependsonge^ngpeopletosupportyou.WhyMeasureReputa?on?
RepTrak®isaregisteredtrademarkofReputa?onIns?tute.Copyright©2017Reputa?onIns?tute.Allrightsreserved.
4
Reputa?onIns?tute-PharmaRepTrak®Scorecard
SUPPORTIVEBEHAVIORS
Buy
RecommendCompany
Benefitofthedoubt
Workfor
SayPosi?ve
Acompanythatdeliversonexpecta?onsinthe7dimensionswillearnsupportfromitsstakeholders
Recommendproducts/services
Recommendasinvestment
5
Howtomanagereputa?on
WhatYouDo
Products CustomerServiceInvestments Employment
WhatYouSayBranding PublicRela?onsMarke?ng Sponsorship
WhatOthersSay
Media KeyOpinionLeadersTopicExperts Friends/Family
Reputa?on Behavior BusinessResultsTouchPoints
6
2017PharmaRepTrak®Reputa?onIns?tute–PharmaRepTrak®2017
7
• The2017GlobalPharmaRepTrak®measures17companieswiththegeneralpublicin8countries.
• With16,800ra?ngscollectedinQ1,2017thisisthelargeststudyofcorporatereputa?onforpharmacompaniesintheworld
• Respondentsarequalifiedat2?ers:• Familiarity:Respondentmustbe“somewhat”or“very”familiarwith
companies• RepTrak®Pulse:75%comple?onofpulsera?ngtobeincluded
• Theresultstellus:• Whichpharmaceu?calcompanieshavethebestreputa?on• Whatdrivesreputa?onandsupportwiththegeneralpublic• Whatisthebusinessimpactfromreputa?on• Howpharmacompaniescanimprovereputa?on
BRAZIL●CANADA●FRANCE●GERMANY●ITALY●SPAIN●THEUNITEDKINGDOM●THEUNITEDSTATES
WelcometothePharmaRepTrak®2017
RepTrak®isaregisteredtrademarkofReputa?onIns?tute.Copyright©2017Reputa?onIns?tute.Allrightsreserved.
8
52%48%
Gender
Male Female
15%
20%
22%
43%
Age
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-64
3%34%
64%
Educa?on
Low Middle High
Somewhatorveryfamiliarwiththe
pharmacompanies
Balancedfemale-malera?o 65%are35orolder 64%withhigheduca?on
BRAZIL●CANADA●FRANCE●GERMANY●ITALY●SPAIN●THEUNITEDKINGDOM●THEUNITEDSTATES
PharmaRepTrak®measuredpercep?onwiththeInformedGeneralPublic
RepTrak®isaregisteredtrademarkofReputa?onIns?tute.Copyright©2017Reputa?onIns?tute.Allrightsreserved.
9
PharmaRepTrak®Findings• Thereputa?onofthePharmaceu?calindustryisstrong!
• 15ofthe17companiesmeasuredhaveastrongreputa?onacrossthe8markets.11companieshaveimprovedtheirreputa?on.2companieshavelostreputa?on
• Thepercep?onhasimprovedacrossall7dimensionssince2016,with5dimensionsnowperceivedasstrong.OnlyGovernanceandCi?zenshipareaverage.
• Governance,Ci?zenship,andProduct/Servicesarethekeydriversofreputa?on.
• Stronglinkbetweenreputa?onandsupport.A5-pointincreaseinreputa?onresultsina9%increaseinrecommenda?on.
• Pharmacompanieswouldbenefitfrommorecommunica?onasoverallfamiliarityiss?lllow,andthegeneralpublicisaskingformoreinforma?onaboutthecompanies.
10
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
2014 2015 2016 2017
Poor/LowestTierWeak/VulnerableAvg./ModerateStrong/RobustExcellent/TopTier 80+
70-7960-6940-59<40
Norma'veScale
71.8
65.8 66.268.2
Source:2017PharmaRepTrak®n=16,898ra?ngsfromgeneralpublicacross8countriesGlobalRepTrak®Pulsescoresthatdifferbymorethan+/-0.2aresignificantlydifferentatthe95%confidencelevel
PharmaReputa?onDevelopment2014–2017Pharmacon?nuesposi?vetrendinto2017andhasforthefirst?meastrongReputa?on
Countriesmeasured2014-2017
11
Poor0-39
8% 15%18% 15% 44%Distribu?onamongrespondents
Poor/LowestTierWeak/VulnerableAvg./ModerateStrong/RobustExcellent/TopTier 80+
70-7960-6940-59<40
Norma'veScale
Source:2017PharmaRepTrak®n=16,898ra?ngsfromgeneralpublicacross8countriesGlobalRepTrak®Pulsescoresthatdifferbymorethan+/-0.2aresignificantlydifferentatthe95%confidencelevel
44%ofrespondentsviewedthecompaniesashavinganExcellentreputa?on-a7%pointincreasecomparedto201626%perceivedthecompaniestobeweakorpoor,downfrom35%in2016.
Thereisaposi?vemovementinreputa?onscores
12
4%
44%47%
5%OffersProducts/ServicesthatareGoodValueforMoney
NEGATIVE NEUTRAL POSITIVE NOTSURE
13
4%
40%47%
8%HasaPosi?veInfluenceonSociety
NEGATIVE NEUTRAL POSITIVE NOTSURE
14
5%
38%42%
15%BehavesEthically
NEGATIVE NEUTRAL POSITIVE NOTSURE
15
2.8%
35.1%
56.8%
5.2%
Commiuedtoadvancesintreatmentsandcures
nega?ve neutral posi?ve notsure
3.4%
37.1%
51.9%
7.5%
Commiuedtopa?entandpersonalsafety
nega?ve neutral posi?ve notsure
5.6%
43.9%42.1%
8.4%
Setspricesfairly
nega?ve neutral posi?ve notsure
Percep?ononspecificPharmatopics
16
69.5
71.8
GlobalPharmaRepTrak®Score
73.5
71.2 72.672.5
70.8
72.0
72.4
USA
UK
Brazil
Italy
Germany
Spain
France
Canada
Poor/LowestTierWeak/VulnerableAvg./ModerateStrong/RobustExcellent/TopTier 80+
70-7960-6940-59<40
Norma'veScale
AllRepTrak®Pulsescoresthatdifferbymorethan+/-0.7aresignificantlydifferentatthe95%confidencelevel
MostlystrongReputa?onacrossmarkets,withbestReputa?onintheUSandpoorestinFranceReputa?onofthePharmaIndustrybyMarket
6.9
1.5
2.4
4.8
7.2
5.8
3.6
Indicatessta?s?callysignificantincrease
17
Overall General Population
71.8
70.9
Male
72.8
Female
Gender
72.7
35-44
Age70.1
18-2418-24
72.0
25-34
71.8
45-64
Country71.2
Canada
70.8
Spain
72.6
UK
69.5
France
73.5
USA
72.0
Italy
72.5
Germany
72.4
Brazil
72.2
Middle
71.2
High
69.8
Low
Educa'on
72.1
Middle
73.7
High
69.4
Low
Income
Poor/LowestTierWeak/VulnerableAvg./ModerateStrong/RobustExcellent/TopTier 80+
70-7960-6940-59<40
Norma'veScale
AllRepTrak®Pulsescoresthatdifferbymorethan+/-0.4aresignificantlydifferentatthe95%confidencelevel
Reputa?onacrosssegments
18
n=16,898
2017GlobalPharmaRepTrak®Scoresbasedon8markets
73.8
73.4
71.469.2
69.5
73.5
75.6
71.8
2016GlobalPharmaRepTrak®Scoresbasedon8markets
4.4
3.8 2.8
2.5
4.3 2.7
2.3
n=12,796
71.1
70.9
68.666.9
65.7
69.1
71.3
68.2
GlobalRepTrak®PulseandDimensionscoresthatdifferbymorethan+/-0.2aresignificantlydifferentatthe95%confidencelevel
Alldimensionsimprovedsince2016butCi?zenshipandGovernances?llaverageDimensionScores
19Allauributescoresthatdifferbymorethan+/-2.1aresignificantlydifferentatthe95%confidencelevel
ThestrengthandweaknessofthePharmaCompaniesPharmascoresbestaroundfinancials,products,andvision,worstonenvironment,transparency,andsuppor?vegoodcauses
Top5percep?ons
Bouom5percep?ons
20
TheBestReputa'oninPharmaReputa?onIns?tute–PharmaRepTrak®2017
21
Company 2017RepTrak®Pulse
AbbVie 74.5NovoNordisk 74.0
TakedaPharmaceu'cal 73.8Roche 73.4
JanssenPharmaceu'cals 72.5GileadSciences 72.4
Bayer 72.3MSD/Merck&Co 72.2
Sanofi 72.0EliLilly 71.9Allergan 71.8
MerckKGaA 71.6Bristol-MyersSquibb 70.5
AstraZeneca 70.4Novar's 70.4
GlaxoSmithKline 68.5Pfizer 68.4
Tier2
Tier3
Tier1
Tier4
AllRepTrak®Pulsescoresthatdifferbymorethan+/-1.0aresignificantlydifferentatthe95%confidencelevel
BestReputa?oninPharmaRepTrak®2017AbbVie,NovoNordisk,Takeda,andRocheleads.GSKandPfizerarelast
5.33.8
3.7New
New
1.74.04.13.41.84.1
3.13.42.03.5 Poor/LowestTier
Weak/VulnerableAvg./ModerateStrong/RobustExcellent/TopTier 80+
70-7960-6940-59<40
Normative Scale
Developmentsince2016
1234567891011121314151617
22
Reputa'on:TheDriverofSupportReputa?onIns?tute–PharmaRepTrak®2017
23
Poor0-39
8% 55%14% 34% 85%
83%
77%
50%
50%
27%
33%
11%
17%
4%
9%
Benefitofdoubt 75%40%23%9%3%
Source:2017GlobalPharmaRepTrak®n=16,898ra?ngsfromgeneralpublicacross8countries
Reputa?ondrivessupportReputa?onhasposi?veimpactacrossthebusiness
24
Bouom3:
Top3:
5%
5%
3%
42%
40%
40%
48%
51%
52%
6%
4%
4%
DISAGREE NEURAL STRONGLYAGREE NOTSURE
10%
10%
6%
43%
41%
46%
36%
40%
42%
12%
8%
6%
DISAGREE NEURAL STRONGLYAGREE NOTSURE
10%pointdifferenceforBenefitofthedoubt:“Ifthecompanyaswasfacingacrisis,Iwouldgivethemthebenefitofthedoubt”
25
AstraZeneca
Bayer
Bris tol-MyersSquibb
El i Li lly
GlaxoSmithKline
MerckKGaA
Novartis
NovoNordisk
Pfizer
Roche
Sanofi
JanssenPharmaceuticals
MSD(MerckSharp&Dohme)
Al lergan
TakedaPharmaceutical
Gi leadSciences
AbbVie
42%
44%
46%
48%
50%
52%
54%
56%
68,0 69,0 70,0 71,0 72,0 73,0 74,0 75,0
%Peoplewhowoulddefinite
lyrecommend
RepTrak®PulseScore
A5-pointIncreaseinReputa'onResultsina9.0%IncreaseinRecommenda'on
R2=0.833
Reputa?onvssupportinPharma
26
2017GlobalPharmaRepTrak®Drivers
FactorAdjustedRegressionN=13,600
Adj-R²=0.757 n=16,898
2017GlobalPharmaRepTrak®Scores
16.4%
13.0%
12.8%
16.8%
17.6%
12.2%
11.1% 73.8
73.4
71.469.2
69.5
73.5
75.6
Poor/LowestTierWeak/VulnerableAvg./ModerateStrong/RobustExcellent/TopTier 80+
70-7960-6940-59<40
Norma'veScale
71.8
GlobalRepTrak®PulseandDimensionscoresthatdifferbymorethan+/-0.2aresignificantlydifferentatthe95%confidencelevel
DriversofReputa?onPharmaisweakestontop2drivers:GovernanceandCi?zenship
27
CorporateBrandandCommunica'onReputa?onIns?tute–PharmaRepTrak®2017
28
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.00%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
GlobalRepTrak®100PharmaCompanies
RepTrak®PulseScore
Familiarity
%
Reputa?onvs.FamiliaritywithinthePharmaIndustryFamiliaritywiththeIndustryisgenerallylowamongthepublic
29
Growingfamiliarityimprovesreputa?onforPharmacompanies
67.6 SomewhatFamiliar
Poor/LowestTierWeak/VulnerableAvg./ModerateStrong/RobustExcellent/TopTier 80+
70-7960-6940-59<40
Norma'veScale
VeryFamiliar
62.4
69.1
75.5
83.4+6,7
+6,4
+7,9
Reputa'on
Familiarity
Reputa?onvs.FamiliaritywithinthePharmaIndustry
30
64
69
74
79
84COMMUNICATESOFTEN
STANDSOUTFROMTHECROWD
CONSISTENTEXPERIENCE
SUFFICIENTINFORMATION
APPEARSGENUINE
WELCOMESOPENDISCUSSION
MEETSNEEDSOFCUSTOMERS
DELIVERSONPROMISE
GlobalPharma GlobalRTTop10
PharmaCompaniesarefallingbehindinCommunica?onvsBestinClass
AllBrandExpressivenessscoresthatdifferbymorethan+/-2.1aresignificantlydifferentatthe95%confidencelevel
31
BrandPersonalityTraitsofthePharmaIndustryPharmacompaniesareprimarilyseenasIntelligent,Modern,Confident,andHard-working
32BLUEauributesreflectpersonalityauributesthathavethehighestposi?veimpactonreputa?onREDauributesreflectpersonalityauributesthatnega?velyimpactreputa?on
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10
5.2
4.4
-6.5
-15.1
-15.2
3.7
Exci'ng
Genuine
Sincere
Boring
Arrogant
Greedy
BrandPersonalityhasabigimpactonReputa?on–Top3andBouom3traits
3Mostassociated
33
DrivingBusinessSuccessThroughReputa'onManagement
Reputa?onIns?tute
34
GlobalPharmaRepTrak®Summary
1. Thereputa'onofthePharmaIndustryisstrongandimproving.
2. Ci'zenship,Product/Services,andGovernancearethemaindriversofReputa'on.
3. Products/ServicesandFinancialPerformancearestrengths,CSRchallenged.
4. The'meisrighttocommunicatemoreaboutkeydrivers.
5. Bigdifferencebetweenmediacoverageandreputa'on.
35
WhatYouDo
Products CustomerServiceInvestments Employment
WhatYouSayBranding PublicRela?onsMarke?ng Sponsorship
WhatOthersSay
Media KeyOpinionLeadersTopicExperts Friends/Family
Reputa?on Behavior BusinessResults
UseRepTrak®toMeasureandManageYourReputa?on
TouchPoints
36
GetYourCompany’sResults
Understandyourreputa?onindetailSeehowlikelyyourstakeholdersaretobuyfromyou,workwithyou,andinvestinyourcompany.
Understandhowyoucanimproveyourscoresandgrowyourstakeholdersupport.Askusatinfo@reputa?onins?tute.com