Upload
others
View
26
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Petrophysics and Exploration Targeting: Best Practice and
ApplicationsMike Dentith, Cameron Adams
The University of Western Australia
Barry BourneTerra Resources
Petrophysics – rock physical properties• Links the geologist’s view of the world with the
geophysicist’s viewChemistry → mineralogy → lithologyDensity/magnetism/conductivity etc → geophysical response
• Significance – what is the geophysics telling us?Mineral system concept has suggested many new geophysical targets: fluid/metal sources, fluid pathways, fluid reservoirsExploration under cover will use more geophysics but its interpretation will have less geological control
Petrophysics – a way forward?• Datasets are often too small and lack
adequate geological contextLithology is not the primary control in many cases → geology ≠ geophysicsPetrophysical consequences of alteration
• Predictive capability is generally poor• Particular need to understand seismic
and electrical conductivityMagnetotellurics, passive seismics
Petrophysics – a conceptual framework
Texture(Geometric Relationships Between Grains)
Bulk(Overall Mineralogy)
Grain(Amount, Size, Shape of Particular
Mineral Species )
Velocity
Paramagnetism
ElectricalConductivity
Ferromagnetism
Density
Lithology can be important, but this is not necessarily so
Porosity is a major control on all physical properties
(except magnetism)ElectricalPolarisation
Carbonate-hosted base metals -• Mississippi valley-type, Irish style• Traditionally considered a poor
geophysical target Mineralisation is poorly conductive and non-magnetic and does not contain radio-elementsGravity and seismic responses are of low amplitude and must be recognised against a noisy backgroundMay be an alteration halo of Fe-sulphides
FrSV
Tv
DaNEA ETDMTD
OLBVT
UMDKILOMETRES
0 500
Harper and Borrok (2007)
Dolomitised rock behind
dolomitisationfront
Carbonate-hosted base metals • Map prospectivity indicators undercover using velocity
(passive seismic) and/or conductivity (magnetotellurics)?N America: deposits associated with a regional dolomitisation frontIreland: deposits associated with ‘hydrothermal’ dolomite
ETD – East Tennessee DistrictMTD – Middle Tennessee DistrictOLB – Old Lead BeltUMD – Upper Mississippi DistrictDa – DavisNEA – NE ArkansasVT – Viburnum TrendTv – TimbervilleFr – FreidensvilleSV – Sinking Valley
MVT Deposits/Districts
Carbonate physical properties• Simple mineralogy
Calcite, dolomite (anhydrite, aragonite)• But chemically very reactive
Dolomitisation (calcite ↔ dolomite)Prone to dissolution and cementation
• Very complex porosity-permeability characteristics
Porosity is a major control on all physical properties (except magnetism)
Carbonate seismic properties• What are the key controls on the
distribution?
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.01000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Density (g/cm3)
Velo
city
(m/s
)
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.01000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Density (g/cm3)
Velo
city
(m/s
)
Calcite Dolomite
Anhydrite
Aragonite
Calcite Aragonite
Anhydrite
Dolomite
Data from 7 published sources
DolostoneLimestone
Carbonate seismic properties• What are the key controls on the
distribution?
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.01000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Density (g/cm3)
Velo
city
(m/s
)
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.01000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Density (g/cm3)
Velo
city
(m/s
)< 5%5-10%10-15%15-20%20-25%25-30%30-35%35-40%40-45%45-50%50-55%
Calcite
Dolomite
Anhydrite
Arag’
Calcite Aragonite
Anhydrite
Dolomite
Porosity()
Carbonate seismic properties• What are the key
controls on the distribution?
0 20 40 601000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Porosity (%)
Velo
city
(m/s
)
Calcite
Dolomite
0 20 40 601.0
2.0
3.0
Porosity (%)
Den
sity
g/c
m3 )
CalciteDolomite
0 20 40 601000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Porosity (%)
Velo
city
(m/s
)
Calcite
Dolomite
DolostoneLimestone
Carbonate seismic properties• What are the key controls on the distribution?
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.01000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Density (g/cm3)
Velo
city
(m/s
)
MoldicInter-particleIntra-particleMicroDensely cemented
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.01000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Density (g/cm3)
Velo
city
(m/s
)
DolomiteCalcite
Dolomite
Calcite
Reference
Stiff Pores
Cracks
Developed from diagrams in Anselmetti & Eberli (1997) and Xu & Payne (2009)
Carbonate seismic properties• What are the key controls on the
distribution – predictive capability?Velocity
DolomiteCalcite
Increasing porosity
Increasing density
Velocity
DolomiteCalcite
Increasing porosity
Increasing densityDeposition
(high carbonatesediment)
Early compaction& diagenesis
Sucrosicdolomitisation
Dissolution(moldic)
Cementation
Dolomitisation(no change to
Early compaction& diagenesis
Dissolution
Intense dolomiticcementation
Dissolution(intra/interparticle)
Developed from diagrams in Anselmetti & Eberli (1997)
Carbonate seismic properties• Theoretically you can map dolomitisation
fronts using seismic methodsAcoustic impedance – seismic attributesVelocity – passive or tomographic seismic
• Other options? Xiao et al. (2016)
Carbonate electrical properties• Formation factor and the Archie equation
Conductive Pore Fluidin Intergranular Porosity
Conductive Pore Fluidin Secondary Porosity
Low Formation Factor
High Formation Factor
Increasing Complexityof Current Flow Path
Pore Fluid orConductive Minerals
in Fractures
This
This ima
This image ca
This image cannot currently be displayed.
This image cannot currently be display…
Th
Th
101
102
103
10-2 10-1 100
Porosity ()
Form
atio
n Fa
ctor
(F)
10-3
100
Inter-Granular
Planar
Vuggy5
6 7
8
12
3
4
Saturated rockPore-fluid
F =am= a, m - empirical parameters
- fractional porosity
Carbonate electrical properties• Matrix plays no part• Electrical properties correlated with the type of
porosity/permeabilityDifferent values for different types of porosityRecognisably different populations for dolostone and limestone – because of their different types of porosity
Data replotted from Ragland (2002)
1.0Cementation Factor (m)
3.02.0 4.0
20
10
0
15
5
Dolostone
1.0
30
Cementation Factor (m)3.02.0 4.0
20
10
0
35
25
15
5
LimestoneMoldic/vuggyInter-particle/crystallineNon Fabric Selective
25
Carbonate electrical properties• Navan deposit, Ireland• Halo of hydrothermal dolomite reaches 20%
VE 20:1
KILOMETRES
0 500
Section A
Section B
Meath Fm
Stackallen Mbr
Vuggy porosity
Limits of dolomitisation
Conglomerate Group oreU/1 lens ore5 lens ore
Faults
A
BKILOMETRES
0 1
Ashton et al., (2015); Braithwaite & Rizzi (1997)
Conclusion• Petrophysical data are potentially very useful for
both testing and generating ideas about exploration strategy
More than just a guide for modelling geophysical responses
• Uncover and mineral systems: a need to understand what controls physical properties and develop a predictive capability
Think beyond lithology - consider alteration and porosityNeed plenty of data and of the right kind - scanners