12
Personalisat ion in the NHS Giles Wilmore Director NHS England T: @GilesWilmore

Personalisation in the NHS Giles Wilmore Director NHS England T: @GilesWilmore

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Personalisation in the NHS

Giles Wilmore DirectorNHS England

T: @GilesWilmore

Structure of presentation

1. Three challenges for the health and social care system.

2. Five Year Forward View3. Empowering people to act – the evidence4. Integrated Personal Commissioning

5. Building partnerships

6. Learning from social care

2

Three challenges: 1) finance 2) rise of multiple chronic conditions 3) moral challenge. All demand different role for people and communities.1) £30 B gap in NHS. Social care not protected like NHS. Cannot just look to more efficient services. Need to invest in capacity of people & communities to do more & create value in NHS and social care.

3

4

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

2000 2008 2016

Num

ber w

ith lo

ng-te

rm c

ondi

tions

(mill

ions

)

One LTC Two LTCs Three+ LTCs

Sources: ONS population projections and General Household Survey

Source: Department of Health analysis of ONS projections and GHS

Estimate for changes in co-morbidity patterns over the next decade, England

2) Multiple LTCs 1.9 m in 2008 to 2.9 m in 2018. Integrated & personalised care necessary

2) Rise of multiple chronic conditions• 15m with LTCs• Biggest growth is

co-morbidity. £s • 70% NHS budget• And growing

number where NHS services do not work

• Need personalisation and care planning

• NHS tailored to ‘Activation’ confidence skills & knowledge

3) Moral challenge. Failing groups whose needs straddle NHS & social care. Lack of involvement of families associated with very poor outcomes

The Confidential Inquiry into Premature Deaths of People with Learning Disabilities (CIPOLD), commissioned by DH • looked at the deaths of 247 people with learning disabilities

in NHS care in the SW over a two year period.  • Last year reported that 37% of deaths of people with

learning disabilities were avoidable

Statistically significant factors in premature deaths:• Problems in care planning,• carers not being listened to• adjusting care as needs changed • living in inappropriate accommodation, and • adherence to the Mental Capacity Act

Heslop et al (2014) The Lancet vol 383, Issue 9920 p 889-895

“There is broad consensus on what the future needs to be. It is a future that empowers patients to take much more control over their own care and treatment. It is a future that dissolves the classic divide, set almost in stone since 1948, between family doctors and hospitals, between physical and mental health, between health and social care, between prevention and treatment.”

Five Year Forward View, 2014

Five Year Forward View emphasised integration, personalisation & empowerment

Evidence strong that ‘Patient Activation’ leads to better outcomes & lower costs

Active and empowered

patientEngagewith

clinician more

Reduced service

use Able to workmore

Meds use

improves

Lifestyle improvements

e.g. diet

Infoseeking

Better disease manage

ment

Study of 25,047 patients showed greater levels of activation experienced better health. Other studies show improved self-management behaviours and reduced service utilisation.

Personal Health Budget trial of 2000 people showed improved quality of life and fewer admissions

Patient Activation = confidence, skills & knowledge

Interventions that build people’s knowledge, skills, confidence…

Personal Health Budgets & personalised care planning• Evaluation: cost effective, improved Quality of Life, best for

high needs. POET survey show impact on carer well-being

Shared Decision Making, including Patient Decision Aids• Better experience of care, some reduction in use of

services, less surgery.

Self-Management Support, such as Expert Patient• Impact of behaviours, Quality of life, symptoms and better

use of resources.• Not just technical information, but behaviour change

NHS | Presentation to [XXXX Company] | [Type Date]8

Integrated personal budgets can deliver integration for individuals without major structural change

• Integration debate should start with people not structures• People themselves have major interest in getting things

right• Too often fail to harness energy, expertise and motivation

of individuals, networks and communities to address our greatest challenges.

• Evidence shows that with the right support, people themselves are the best integrators of care*

*Forder et al (2012) Evaluation of Personal Health Budget Pilot Programme, University of Kent. Showed significantly improved quality of life for individuals and carers, benefits higher for more complex needs, more flexible services & reduced hospital admissions

Integrated Personal Commissioning model -change conditions & create strong partnerships

Care model: Person-centred care and care planning, combined with an optional personal health and social care budget• Personalised care and support planning, • advocacy and brokerage • peer support • AND a clear offer of integrated personal budgets across health &

social care for those who will benefit.

Financial model: An integrated, “year of care” capitated payment model• To remove existing financial barriers to prevention and integration,

as well incentives for unnecessary activity that drive up costs. • Funding model that brings together NHS and local authority

funding for a defined target population. 10

We are building new partnerships to do this

NHS must learn from social care • Local government led

the way on personalisation

• Value of co-production • Value of voluntary sector• Asset based approach. • Takes us from “what’s

the matter with you”, to “what matters to you”