Upload
brandon-armstrong
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
P3=Plagiarism, Publications, and Professional Service
Mark S. DaskinDept. of IE/MS, Northwestern University
Evanston, IL 60208
Spring, 2006
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 2
Why me in bio-ethics?
“You don’t know anything about bio-ethics!” – Babette R. Levy, 5/10/06
“She’s right!”Editor-in-chief of 2 major journals (8 years)VP publications, INFORMS (4 years)President, INFORMSKnow something about publications overall.
Want to learn about pubs in your field.
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 3
What is plagiarism?
“If you steal from one author, it’s plagiarism; if you steal from many, it’s research.” • Wilson Mizner (1876–1933), U.S. dramatist,
wit. Quoted in The Legendary Mizners, ch. 4, Alva Johnson (1953). http://www.bartleby.com/66/65/40065.html
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 5
What is plagiarism?
Northwestern UniversityPrinciples Regarding Academic Integrity
“submitting material that in part or whole is not entirely one's own work without attributing those same portions to their correct source.”
http://www.northwestern.edu/uacc/uniprin.html
Material to be cited• Quoted Material and
Unusual Opinion or Knowledge
• Interpretation• Paraphrased Material• Using Other Authors'
Examples• Using Other Authors'
Charts and Graphs• Using Class Notes• Debatable Facts• Unusual Facts
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 6
What is plagiarism?
“Plagiarism is passing off a source's information, ideas, or words as your own by omitting to cite them
Plagiarism usually takes one of these forms • An uncited idea
• An uncited structure or organizing strategy
• Uncited information or data from a source
• A verbatim phrase or passage that isn't quoted” http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~expos/sources/chap3.html
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 7
Publishing and Reviewing – AVOID Plagiarism
Plagiarizing others• Avoid at all costs
• Reference heavily – always better to cite someone than not
Self plagiarism• Failure to adequately
cite related work
• Copying sections, figures, tables from other papers
• Citing your thesis for multiple publications is NOT adequate
You WILL get caught Small world You CAN be banned
from publishing in journals
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 8
What is self-plagiarism
“Publication of what is essentially the same paper in more than one journal, but without any indication that the paper has been published elsewhere
Partitioning of a large study which should have been reported in a single paper into smaller published studies
Copyright infringement Practice of text recycling.”
http://facpub.stjohns.edu/~roigm/plagiarism/Self%20plagiarism.html
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 9
Impact of self-plagiarism
From letter from MSD to a junior faculty member who submitted very similar papers to IIE Transactions and EJOR. Neither paper cited the other, but both cited his dissertation.• “The editorial board of IIE Transactions has determined that
your submission of a substantially similar paper and your failure to reference the earlier EJOR paper constitute a serious breach of editorial standards. … As a result of this editorial breach, we are prohibiting you from submitting any publications to IIE Transactions for a period of four years beginning August 1, 2003.”
Even self-plagiarism is a great way to ruin your career.
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 10
Q: What is this?
You WILL get caught Small world You CAN be banned
from publishing in journals
A: Someone who submitted the same paper to two journals (parallel submission or dual submission)
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 11
Dual or parallel submissions andself-plagiarism
“I certify that the manuscript I am submitting for review and publication is not under review at any other journal, will not be submitted for review at another journal until IIE Transactions makes an editorial decision regarding the paper, and has not been published in any other journal.”• You must click that you have read this to
submit a paper to IIE Transactions
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 12
Bottom line
Attribute everything whenever you are in doubt
Avoid self plagiarismThou shalt not dual submitCultural differences are not an excuse
and do not matter!!
You will get caught!!
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 13
If in doubt?
Reference and cite original
sources!!
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 14
Sources – thanks to Wally Hopp!
http://www.writing.northwestern.edu/avoiding_plagiarism.html http://www.northwestern.edu/uacc/plagiar.html http://www.georgetown.edu/honor/plagiarism.html http://www.engineering.uiowa.edu/~ctc/docs/ctc_guides/
ctc_guide_avoiding_plagiarism.html http://www.princeton.edu/pr/pub/integrity/pages/plagiarism.html http://www.depts.drew.edu/composition/Avoiding_Plagiarism.htm
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 15
Another Issue – Refereeing
Everyone has a role• Editor
• Department Editor
• Referee
• Author
Author in writing the paper• This paper makes the
following N contributions:
• Contribution should not be 1/15th of your tenure case
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 16
Refereeing
Editor• Does the paper conform to
the editorial mission of the journal adequately?
• Reject inappropriate papers quickly
• When communicating back to the author, clearly identify comments that must be responded to
• Take (prudent) risks
Department editor• Is the claimed
contribution important for the field?
• If not, reject quickly
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 17
Refereeing
Referee• Does the paper make the
claimed contribution?
• How can the paper be improved?
• Find what is good in the paper – be constructive
• Not to reject everything
• Not to decide if the paper is appropriate for the journal
• It is not your paper.
Author• Respond to comments
• Identify changes in the text (highlight)
• Be timely in your response
• If you submit and expect 3 reviews, you owe the system 3 reviews (divided by number of authors in your paper)
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 18
Refereeing
All in the process• Never use material from a paper that you
referee• Don’t drag out refereeing process
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 19
Peer Review
Under attack in this country. I don’t know what a good publication is, but I think I know
it when I see it.• “I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material
but I know it when I see it.” Justice Potter Stewart (referring to pornography)http://en.thinkexist.com/quotes/Potter_Stewart/
Worst of all systems until you consider the alternatives• “It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government
except all the others that have been tried.” – Winston Churchill http://en.thinkexist.com/quotation/it_has_been_said_that_democracy_is_the_worst_form/15815.html
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 20
Service to profession and society
You have been given much• Owe something in
return to Profession Society Country
Crisis in science and math education in US• Find some way
To give back To ensure that others
can follow you
Plagiarism, Publications, Professional Service
You will get more back than you put in!
May 2006 M. S. Daskin, IE/MS, Northwestern U. 21
Questions – for me? for discussion?
Who should be an author? First author? Corresponding author? Last author? Order of authors?
What is enough for a paper? How long should a paper be under review? How
many times should it be cycled? Do you think peer review will persist? What can you do to avert the national shortage in
math and science students – national crisis?