8
Eur. J. Psychiat.Vol. 23, N.° 1, (53-60) 2009 Keywords: Lithium; Cluster headache; Review. Lithium treatment in cluster headache, review of literature M.B. Abdel-Maksoud MBChB, MRCPsych* A. Nasr MBChB, MSc, MRCPsych** A. Abdul-Aziz MBChB, MSc*** * ST4 in Addiction Psychiatry, The Wells Road Centre, The Wells Road, Nottingham ** Consultant Psychiatrist, Queen Elizabeth Psychiatric Hospital, Birmingham *** Senior House Officer, Queen Elizabeth Psychiatric Hospital, Birmingham UNITED KINGDOM ABSTRACT – Background: The pain, which is involved in Cluster Headache (CH), is ex- cruciating and is probably one of the most painful conditions known to humans. In the early 70es it was found out that lithium could be used in treating this rare condition. Ekbom pro- duced his first report of using lithium successfully to treat five cases of CH and this was fol- lowed later by other studies, which showed the effectiveness of lithium in this condition. Objective: In this article we reviewed the evidence for using lithium in CH. We discuss some issues including the duration, the dosage of lithium required and the short and long- term side effects, which are likely to occur. We also included the mechanism of action of lithium in treating this condition. Methodology: We searched the Medline database from 1950 to date. We included all studies done in English, which were related to the use of lithium in cluster headache. We excluded all studies which were not in English and which included other types of headache. Results and conclusions: We concluded that lithium is effective in both chronic and episodic forms of cluster Headache. Received 9 January 2008 Revised 2 December 2008 Accepted 11 December 2008

ook 2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

as

Citation preview

Page 1: ook 2

Eur. J. Psychiat. Vol. 23, N.° 1, (53-60)2009

Keywords: Lithium; Cluster headache; Review.

Lithium treatment in cluster headache, review ofliterature

M.B. Abdel-Maksoud MBChB, MRCPsych*A. Nasr MBChB, MSc, MRCPsych**A. Abdul-Aziz MBChB, MSc***

* ST4 in Addiction Psychiatry, The WellsRoad Centre, The Wells Road, Nottingham

** Consultant Psychiatrist, Queen ElizabethPsychiatric Hospital, Birmingham

*** Senior House Officer, Queen ElizabethPsychiatric Hospital, Birmingham

UNITED KINGDOM

ABSTRACT – Background: The pain, which is involved in Cluster Headache (CH), is ex-cruciating and is probably one of the most painful conditions known to humans. In the early70es it was found out that lithium could be used in treating this rare condition. Ekbom pro-duced his first report of using lithium successfully to treat five cases of CH and this was fol-lowed later by other studies, which showed the effectiveness of lithium in this condition.

Objective: In this article we reviewed the evidence for using lithium in CH. We discusssome issues including the duration, the dosage of lithium required and the short and long-term side effects, which are likely to occur. We also included the mechanism of action oflithium in treating this condition.

Methodology: We searched the Medline database from 1950 to date. We included allstudies done in English, which were related to the use of lithium in cluster headache. Weexcluded all studies which were not in English and which included other types of headache.

Results and conclusions: We concluded that lithium is effective in both chronic andepisodic forms of cluster Headache.

Received 9 January 2008Revised 2 December 2008Accepted 11 December 2008

Page 2: ook 2

54 M.B. ABDEL-MAKSOUD ET AL.

Introduction

CH is a rare condition, which is charac-terized by severe explosive pain, which lastsfor less than three hours and occurs mainlyin males. There are two forms of CH name-ly the chronic and the episodic forms. In thechronic form, the attacks occur for morethan one year without remission or with re-mission lasting less than 1 month. In theepisodic form, the attacks occur in periodslasting 7 days to 1 year separated by painfree periods lasting 1 month or longer. Thepain is strictly unilateral in the orbital,supra-orbital, and or temporal region andassociated with ipsilateral cranial autonom-ic symptoms and signs such as conjunctivalinjection, lacrimation, nasal congestion, rhi-norrhea, miosis, and low grade ptosis. Mostpatients are restless or agitated during an at-tack1. Cluster Headache has been shown tobe associated with dysfunction in the ner-vous system, notably with involvement ofthe hypothalamus. Attacks occur with re-markable regularity and are related to REMsleep. They are followed by refractorinessfor few hours and tend to have a seasonalpattern2.

Graham suggested that the effect of lithi-um on cluster headache may be, becausethis disorder shares several characteristicswith manic depressive disease3.

Studies

Karl Ekbom did the first study when hetreated 5 patients with CH (3 with chronicCH and 2 with episodic CH). Serum lithiumlevel was maintained between 0.7& 1.2 mEq/l. Lithium was found to be effective inall 5 patients2.

In another study by Bussone et al., 20 pa-tients with a diagnosis of chronic CH weretreated with lithium carbonate. The doses oflithium varied from 900mg to 2.2 gm/day.All patients improved rapidly on treatmentand once treatment was stopped in some pa-tients the headache returned within 36hours4.

Later on, Kudrow treated a group of 32patients suffering from chronic CH withlithium carbonate. The patients had previ-ously tried different medications includingmethysergide, prednisone, and ergotaminewithout any result. Serum lithium levelswere maintained lower than 1.2 mEq/l. 27patients showed a dramatic improvement,whereas the therapy was found to be inef-fective in 5 patients5.

Mathew undertook another clinical trialof lithium carbonate on 31 patients with CH(14 episodic, and 17 chronic). 80% of thepatients responded to lithium and only 20%showed no improvement. Effectiveness oflithium was evident in less than a week afterthe initiation of treatment in those who re-sponded. 55% of patients showed mild sideeffects. Treatment was stopped in one pa-tient only because of intolerable side ef-fects6.

In a study by Peatfield, 31 patients withCH were given lithium carbonate and theserum lithium levels were maintained at0.6-0.69mmol/l. 14 patients showed amarked improvement in the first week, and10 patients showed a lesser improvement7.

Ekbom gave a further contribution in1981 when he conducted a study on 19 pa-tients (8 with chronic CH and 11 withepisodic CH). He tried lithium sulphate andlithium levels were maintained between 0.7and 1.2 mmol/l. Immediate partial remis-sion occurred in all chronic cases. In 4 caseswith episodic CH lithium was continued for

Page 3: ook 2

several months which resulted in completesuppression of cluster periods. The rest ofthe patients with episodic CH had slight orno benefit8.

In a trial by Faustino Savoldi et al., theyincluded 90 CH patients (68 with episodic&22 with chronic symptoms). In the 2nd weekof lithium treatment over 80% of the pa-tients with chronic CH improved by morethan 90%. In the short term, some side ef-fects occurred which were mild and tolera-ble. The doses of lithium varied from 600 to1200 mg/day and plasma lithium levels var-ied from 0.3 to 0.8 m Eq/l. Of the 68 pa-tients with episodic CH, about 3/4 improvedby > 60%. Mild side effects appeared in 18cases (tremors, thirst, and insomnia). Theplasma level varied from 0.3 to 0.7 m Eq/l9.

Manzoni et al. have investigated the shortand long-term effects of administration oflithium carbonate (900 mg/day) in 90 pa-tients with CH (68 episodic and 22 chronic).50% of the patients with chronic CH (11 pa-tients) showed a definite improvement,whereas, 50% had initial or partial improve-ment only. In 9 cases, cessation of lithiumresulted in reappearance of symptoms. Inthe episodic group, 26 patients respondedhighly, 26 patients responded partially, and16 cases were refractory. Reversible goitredeveloped in 3 cases after 1-3 years of treat-ment10.

A double blind study by Bussone et al.compared the effect of Lithium and Vera-pamil in treating CH Showed that bothLithium and verapamil are effective in pre-venting Chronic CH. They involved 30 pa-tients diagnosed with Chronic CH accord-ing to the International Headache Societycriteria11. Regarding efficacy, both drugssignificantly improved Headache Index(HI), and Analgesic Consumption (AC). Ve-rapamil showed > 50% reduction in HI and

58% in AC & Lithium showed > 37% and58% respectively in the 1st week. RegardingSide effects, both drugs showed minor sideeffects (12% for verapamil and 29% forlithium)12.

Steiner et al. conducted a double blind,placebo-controlled comparison of matchedparallel groups of patients with episodic CHwhere treatment was slow release lithiumcarbonate, 800 mg/day, or placebo. Substan-tial improvement occurred in 8/13(62% NS)on lithium and 6/14 (43%) on placebo andthe trial was stopped because superiority oflithium could not be demonstrated13.

There are other case reports whichshowed the effectiveness of lithium carbon-ate in treating both forms of CH. Wyant &Ashenhurst reported five cases of patientswho had a diagnosis of CH(4 chronic and 1episodic). They tried lithium carbonate andlater on added amitriptyline for patientswith chronic CH and lithium carbonate onlyfor the patient with episodic CH. Completeremission occurred in the patient withepisodic CH and 1 patient with chronic CH.A significant improvement occurred in 3 pa-tients with chronic CH14.

In 1978, Lieb & Zeff reported two caseswith severe chronic CH to the extent thatthey had suicidal ideations. Both cases re-sponded dramatically to lithium carbonatewith serum levels of 0.76 - 1.15 mEq/l15.

Kilmek et al. used lithium carbonate totreat 15 patients with CH (8 chronic and 7episodic). In all cases lithium serum levelwas maintained at 0.6-1.2 mmol/l. Disap-pearance of symptoms occurred in 5 pa-tients (1 chronic and 4 episodic) and signifi-cant improvement occurred in 5 patients (4chronic and 1 episodic). The treatment wasineffective in 5 patients (3 chronic and 2episodic)16.

LITHIUM TREATMENT IN CLUSTER HEADACHE, REVIEW OF LITERATURE 55

Page 4: ook 2

In an open trial, Damasio & Lyon triedlithium carbonate on 21 patients with CH (9episodic, 12 chronic). 52.4% (n = 11) of pa-tients showed absolute improvement, 23.8%(n = 5) showed partial improvement, and23.8% (n = 5) did not improve or had tempo-rary improvement only. Two patients had todiscontinue treatment due to side effects17.

J M S Pearce reported 3 cases of episodicCH which responded dramatically to lithiumcarbonate at a dose of 250mg tds. No side ef-fects were observed from lithium use18.

In 1980, Manzoni and Terzano tried lithiumcarbonate at gradually increased doses in 6patients with chronic CH. The effective doseof lithium varied from 300 to 900mg/day19.

Zuddas et al. reported a case of chronic CHon haemodialysis treatment where lithiumwas used and led to a complete recovery20.

Mechanism of action oflithium

Some trials have been undertaken in anattempt to understand how lithium works inpatients with Cluster Headache.

Kupfer et al.21 and Mendels & Chernik22

reported that the immediate action of lithi-um in treating CH is related to its effect onREM sleep.

In another study by Medina et al., it wasfound that lithium effect on CH is related toits effect on platelet serotonin and histaminelevels23.

It was also suggested that lithium actionin CH can be attributed to its effect on opi-ate receptor affinity24.

Giacovazzo et al. studied the relationshipbetween genetic markers of patients with

CH and the therapeutic efficacy of lithium.In this study, 35 patients with episodic CHwere involved. Lithium level was kept be-tween 0.7 and 1.2 mEq/l. Two subgroupswere identified (responders n = 21 and nonresponders n = 14). Responders displayed ahigher frequency of the antigens HLA-B18and HLA-A9 than did the non responders.The latter, on the other hand, showed a high-er frequency of HLA-A1 than did the re-sponders25.

It was also found that lithium can correctthe bilateral neuronal asymmetries whichare related to the pathogenesis of CH26.

In a study by De Bellaroche et al., it wasfound that lithium restored the erythrocytecholine concentrations which were marked-ly reduced in patients with CH. This findingwas consistent with a subsequent studywhich showed a decreased turnover in theerythrocyte phosphatidylcholine in CH suf-ferers27,28.

Winter et al. suggested that the mecha-nism of action of lithium in CH lies behindits antiviral actions29. This was based on thetheory which suggests an association be-tween CH and herpes simplex30.

A study by G Chazot et al. showed thechronobiological effect of lithium in clusterheadache. The result showed a decrease inmelatonin amplitude at day 0 in the clustergroup together with a rise in the cortisol.However in day 7 there was a delay in mela-tonin secretion with a shift but clear in-crease of the acrophase was observed. A de-crease in cortisol level was also observed31.

The cyclic nature and hormonal alter-ations in CH indicate the involvement of thehypothalamus in the pathogenesis of thisdisorder. One possible mechanism of actionof lithium is its effect on the serotonin levelin the hypothalamus32.

56 M.B. ABDEL-MAKSOUD ET AL.

Page 5: ook 2

LITHIUM TREATMENT IN CLUSTER HEADACHE, REVIEW OF LITERATURE 57Ta

ble

ISu

mm

ary

of s

tudi

es o

f us

ing

lithi

um in

Clu

ster

Hea

cach

e

Stud

yN

o.C

hron

icE

piso

dic

Lith

ium

Dos

age

Res

ults

Side

eff

ects

Of

pts

CH

CH

and/

or L

evel

Ekb

om2

53

20.

7-1.

2 m

Eq/

l10

0% im

prov

edN

il re

port

ed

Kud

row

532

320

<1.

2 m

Eq/

l27

pat

ient

s im

prov

ed d

ram

atic

ally

.4

patie

nts

disc

ontin

ued

beca

use

of s

ever

e si

de e

ffec

ts

5 pa

tient

s di

d no

t res

pond

.(h

eada

che,

abdo

min

al p

ain,

and

vom

iting

).

Mat

hew

631

1714

Up

to 9

00m

g/d

80%

sho

wed

impr

ovem

ent (

>90

%i

55%

of

patie

nts

show

ed m

ild s

ide

effe

cts

(tre

mor

s,L

evel

:0.5

-1.2

mE

q/l

impr

ovem

ent i

n 55

%,6

0-90

%

naus

ea,d

iarr

hea,

and

abdo

min

al d

isco

mfo

rt).

im

prov

emen

t in1

0%,2

5-60

%

1 pa

tient

dis

cont

inue

d du

e to

into

lera

ble

side

eff

ects

im

prov

emen

t in

15%

).(d

isab

ling

leth

argy

).20

% s

how

ed n

o im

prov

emen

t

Peat

fiel

d731

427

800-

1600

mg

noct

eM

arke

d im

prov

emen

t- 1

4 pa

tient

s.In

trac

tabl

e vo

miti

ng in

duce

d in

2 c

ases

.L

evel

:0.6

0-0.

69

Les

ser

impr

ovem

ent-

10 p

atie

nts.

mm

ol/l

No

impr

ovem

ent-

7 pa

tient

s.

Ekb

om8

198

110.

7-1.

2mm

ol/l

8 C

hron

ic c

ases

sho

wed

imm

edia

te

3 pa

tient

s in

the

chro

nic

grou

p re

port

ed s

light

pa

rtia

l rem

issi

on.

diar

rhea

,tre

mor

,and

incr

ease

d th

irst

.7

epis

odic

pat

ient

s sh

owed

slig

ht o

r 3

patie

nts

in th

e ep

isod

ic g

roup

rep

orte

d tir

edne

ss,

no e

ffec

t.tr

emor

,ver

tigo,

diar

rhea

,and

incr

ease

d th

irst

.4

epis

odic

cas

es s

how

ed c

ompl

ete

rem

issi

on w

ith lo

ng te

rm tr

eatm

ent

Savo

ldi9

9022

6860

0-12

00M

ore

than

80%

of

chro

nic

case

sM

ild to

lera

ble

side

eff

ects

in 1

8 ep

isod

ic c

ases

L

evel

s:im

prov

ed>

90%

.(t

rem

ors,

thir

st,a

nd in

som

nia)

.0.

3-0.

8mE

q/l.

75%

of e

piso

dic

case

s im

prov

ed >

60%

.M

ild to

lera

ble

side

eff

ect i

n 7

chro

nic

case

s (t

rem

or,

diar

rhea

,abd

omin

al p

ain,

olfa

ctor

y ha

lluci

natio

ns,

inso

mni

a,ve

rtig

o,an

d in

crea

sed

thir

st).

Lon

g te

rm s

ide

effe

cts

incl

uded

rev

ersi

ble

goitr

e.

Man

zoni

9022

6890

0mg/

dC

onst

ant i

mpr

ovem

ent i

n 11

chr

onic

M

ild s

ide

effe

cts

(tre

mor

,inc

reas

ed th

irst

,ins

omni

a,et

al.10

case

s.di

arrh

ea,l

etha

rgy,

diff

use

head

ache

,abd

omin

al p

ain,

Hig

h re

spon

se in

26

epis

odic

cas

es.

olfa

ctor

y ha

lluci

natio

n,an

d ve

rtig

o).

3 ca

ses

deve

lope

d eu

thyr

oid

goitr

e af

ter

1-3

year

s of

tr

eatm

ent w

hich

dis

appe

ared

aft

er s

topp

ing

lithi

um.

Bus

sone

1230

300

900m

g/d

>37

% r

educ

tion

in H

I an

d 58

%

29%

of

patie

nts

deve

lope

d m

inor

sid

e ef

fect

sre

duct

ion

in A

C(g

astr

oint

estin

al c

ompl

aint

s,be

havi

oura

l cha

nges

,tr

emor

,and

incr

ease

d di

ures

is).

Page 6: ook 2

58 M.B. ABDEL-MAKSOUD ET AL.Ta

ble

I (c

ontin

ue)

Stud

yN

o.C

hron

icE

piso

dic

Lith

ium

Dos

age

Res

ults

Side

eff

ects

Of

pts

CH

CH

and/

or L

evel

Stei

ner13

130

1380

0mg/

d62

%;N

S 8

case

s) s

how

ed s

ubst

antia

lO

nly

min

or s

ide

effe

cts

repo

rted

(po

lyur

ea r

epor

ted

0.5-

0.6m

mol

/lim

prov

emen

tin

5 c

ases

).

Wya

nt e

t al.14

54

160

0mg/

d in

1 c

ase.

Com

plet

e re

mis

sion

in 2

cas

es

Nil

repo

rted

.L

evel

s:1.

14 a

nd

(1ep

isod

ic a

nd 1

chr

onic

).1.

28 in

2 c

ases

.Si

gnif

ican

t im

prov

emen

t in

3 ca

ses.

Lie

b &

2

20

Dos

es:1

200&

Bot

h ca

ses

impr

oved

dra

mat

ical

ly.

Mild

neu

rom

uscu

lar

side

eff

ects

in 1

cas

e.Z

eff15

1500

mg/

d.L

evel

s:0.

76-

1.15

mE

q/l

Kilm

ek e

t al.16

158

7D

oses

:750

-150

0R

emis

sion

in 5

cas

es (

1 ch

roni

c an

d 1

patie

nt d

evel

oped

into

lera

ble

side

eff

ects

and

m

g/d.

4 ep

isod

ic).

trea

tmen

t was

dis

cont

inue

d.L

evel

s:0.

6-1.

2Si

gnif

ican

t im

prov

emen

t in

5 pa

tient

sN

o ot

her

side

eff

ects

rep

orte

d.m

mol

/l(4

chr

onic

&1

epis

odic

)N

o im

prov

emen

t in

5 ca

ses

(3 c

hron

ic&

2 ep

isod

ic).

Bus

sone

20

200

900m

g-2.

2gm

/d16

cas

es im

prov

ed r

apid

ly w

ith n

o 1

patie

nt r

epor

ted

gast

ric

dist

urba

nces

and

hea

dach

eet

al.4

furt

her

cris

is w

hile

on

trea

tmen

t w

hile

on

a hi

gh d

ose.

for

2-24

wee

ks.

4 ca

ses

impr

oved

but

not

com

plet

ely.

Dam

asio

&

2112

9D

oses

:600

-150

0A

bsol

ute

impr

ovem

ent.-

11 p

atie

nts.

No

seri

ous

side

eff

ects

wer

e no

ted

but2

pat

ient

s ha

dLy

on17

mg/

day.

Part

ial i

mpr

ovem

ent-

5 pa

tient

s.

to d

isco

ntin

ue tr

eatm

ent d

ue to

sid

e ef

fect

s L

evel

:0.3

8-1.

14N

o im

prov

emen

t-5

patie

nts.

(d

iarr

hea,

poly

urea

,pol

ydyp

sia,

dizz

ines

s,an

d m

g/m

lun

stea

dine

ss).

Pear

ce18

30

325

0mg

tds

All

patie

nts

resp

onde

d dr

amat

ical

lyN

il re

port

ed.

Man

zoni

&

66

030

0mg/

d in

1 c

ase.

90%

impr

ovem

ent i

n al

l cas

es.

Nil

repo

rted

.Te

rzan

o1960

0mg/

d in

3 c

ases

.90

0mg/

d in

2 c

ases

Zud

das

et a

l.201

10

300m

g/d

duri

ng .

Com

plet

e re

cove

ry w

hen

lithi

um

Nil

repo

rted

.di

alys

isle

vel r

each

ed 0

.46

mm

ol/l.

150m

g/d

duri

ng

non

dial

ysis

.

Page 7: ook 2

LITHIUM TREATMENT IN CLUSTER HEADACHE, REVIEW OF LITERATURE 59

Discussion

We concluded from our review that lithi-um can be effective in both types of clusterheadache but, perhaps, the evidence of itseffectiveness in episodic forms is rathercontroversial. Some authors found thatthere is a decrease in the effectiveness oflithium after prolonged use in this condi-tion. This may be due to tolerance or lackof compliance for one reason or another.There is a controversy regarding the re-quired dose of lithium in patients with CHand some authors required higher doses toreach a plasma level between 0.7-1.2mmol/l. Others, on the other hand, foundthat low doses of lithium with plasma levelsbetween 0.4-1.0 mmol/l should be adequatefor this condition.

In the short term the side effects of lithi-um are generally tolerable and they aremainly in the form of fine hand tremors,polyurea, and polydypsia. In the long term,hypothyroid goitre and renal impairmentmay develop. Hypothyroidism secondary tolong-term lithium treatment can be treatedand should not be an indication to stop lithi-um in stable clients. It is important that pa-tients be well informed as to the needs forperiodic lithium blood level determinationsand the adverse as well as the beneficial ef-fects of the drug.

It should be noted that with exception ofthe two studies done by Bussone et al.12,and Steiner et al.13, results have been de-rived solely from open clinical trials.

Although there are different theories be-hind the mechanism of action of lithium intreating CH, however, it remains unclear tohow exactly it works and produces its rapideffect in this condition.

References

1. International Classification of Headache Disorders,2nd edition. Cluster Headache and other trigeminal autono-mic cephalalgias. Cephalalgia 2004; 24 (Suppl. 1): 44-45.

2. Ekbom K. Lithium in the treatment of chronic clusterheadache. Headache 1977; 17: 39-40.

3. Graham JR. Treatment of cluster headache (work-shop), Sixteenth Annual Meeting, American AssociationFor the study of Headache. June, 1974.

4. Bussone G, Boiardi A, Merati B, Crenna P, Picco A.Chronic Cluster Headache: response to lithium treatment. JNeurol 1979; 221: 181-185.

5. Kudrow L. Lithium prophylaxis for chronic clusterheadache. Headache 1977; 17: 15-18.

6. Mathew NT. Clinical subtypes of cluster headache andresponse to lithium therapy. Headache 1978; 18: 26-30.

7. Peatfield RC. Lithium in migraine and clusterheadache: a review. J R Soc Med 1981; 74: 432-436.

8. Ekbom K. Lithium for cluster headache: Review ofthe literature and preliminary results of long term treat-ment. Headache 1981; 21: 132-139.

9. Savoldi F, Bono G, Manzoni GC, Micieli G, Lan-franchi M, Nappi G. Lithium salts in cluster headachetreatment. Cephalalgia 1983; 1: 80-84.

10. Manzoni GC, Bono G, Lanfranchi M, Micieli G,Terzano MG, Nappi G. Lithium carbonate in clusterheadache: assessment of its short and long term therapeuticefficacy. Cephalalgia 1983; 3: 109-114.

11. Headache Classification Committee of the Interna-tional Headache Society: Classification and DiagnosticCriteria for Headache Disorders, Cranial Neuralgias andfacial pain. Cephalalgia 1988; 8(suppl. 7): 1-96.

12. Bussone G, Leone M, Peccarisi C, Micieli G,Granella F, Magri M, et al. Double blind comparison ofLithium & Verapamil in Cluster Headache Prophylaxis.Headache 1990; 30: 411-417.

13. Steiner TJ, Hering R, Couturier EGM, Davies PTG,Whitmarsh TE. Double Blind Placebo-Controlled trial oflithium in episodic cluster headache. Cephalalgia 1997;17: 673-675.

14. Wyant GM, Ashenhurst EM. Chronic pain syn-dromes and their treatment in Cluster Headache. CanadAnaesth Soc J 1979; 26: 1: 38-41.

15. Leib J, Zeff A. Lithium Treatment of Chronic Clus-ter Headache. Brit J Psychiat 1978; 133: 556-558.

Page 8: ook 2

60 M.B. ABDEL-MAKSOUD ET AL.

16. Klimek A, Szulc-Kuberska J, Kawiorski S. LithiumTherapy in Cluster Headache. Euro Neurol 1979; 18: 267-268.

17. Damasio H, Lyon L. Lithium Carbonate in theTreatment of Cluster Headache. J Neurol 1980; 224: 1-8.

18. Pearce JMS. Chronic Migrainous Neuralgia. Brain1980; 103: 149-159.

19. Manzoni GC, Terzano MG. Lithium carbonate inchronic cluster headache: assessment of therapeutic effica-cy and possible mechanisms of action. Ital J Neurol Sci1980; 1: 149-153.

20. Zuddas A, Mulas S, Del-Zompo M, Corsini GU.Cluster Headache: clinical efficacy of lithium salts inhaemodialysis treated patient. Cephalalgia 1985; 5: 95-98.

21. Kupfer DJ, Wyatt RJ, Greenspan K, Scott J, SnyderF. Lithium Carbonate and sleep in affective illness. ArchGen Psychiat 1970; 23: 35-40.

22. Mendels J, Chernik DA. The effect of lithium car-bonate on the sleep of depressed patients. Int Pharma-copsychiatry 1973; 8: 184-192.

23. Medina JL, Fareed J, Diamond S. Lithium carbonatetherapy for cluster headache. Arch Neurol 1980; 37: 559-563.

24. Gillin JC, Hong JS, Yang HY, Costa E. (Met5)Enkephalin content in brain regions of rats treated withlithium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978; 75: 2991-2993.

25. Giacovazzo M, Martelletti P, Romiti, Gallo MF, Lu-vara E. Relationship between HLA System in ClusterHeadache and Clinical Response to lithium Therapy.Headache 1985; 25: 268-270.

26. Fanclullacci M, Pietrini U, Boccuni M, Gatto G,Cangi F. Does lithium balance the neuronal bilateral asym-metries in cluster headache? Cephalalgia 1983; 3: 85-87.

27. De Belleroche J, Cook GE, Tresidder I, Joseph R,Das I, Clifford R. Erythrocyte choline concentrations andcluster headache. Br Med J 1984; 288: 268-270.

28. De Bellaroche J, Kilfeather S, Das I, Rose FC. Ab-normal membrane composition and membrane dependanttransduction mechanisms in cluster headache. Cephalalgia1986; 6: 147-153.

29. Winter MD, Hartley CE, Randall SL, Mcleish P,Skinner GRB, Horrobin DF, et al.: The antiviral effects oflithium. Rev Contemp Pharmacother 1993; 4: 259-268.

30. Jose R, Rose FC. Cluster headache and herpes sim-plex: an association? Br Med J 1985; 290: 1625-1626.

31. Chazot G, Claustrat B, Brun J, Zaidan R. Effect onthe Pattern of Melatonin and Cortisol in Cluster Headacheof Single Administration of Lithium at 7.00 p.m. daily overone week: A Preliminary report. Pharmacopsychiatry1987; 20: 222-223.

32. Friedmann E, Wang HY. Effect of chronic lithiumtreatment on 5-hydroxy tryptamine and release of 5-(3H)Hydroxytryptamine from rat brain cortical, hyppocampaland hypothalamic slices. J Neurochem 1988; 50: 195-201.

Address for correspondence:Dr. M B Abdel-Maksoud ST4 in Addiction Psychiatry,The Wells Road Centre,The Wells Road,Nottingham,NG3 3AA.U.K.Tel.: 01159691300 ext.:11122Fax: 01159529422 E-mail: [email protected]