If you can't read please download the document
Upload
duongcong
View
222
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
30
CHAPTER 2
CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS OF OOK AND
DPSK OCDMA SYSTEMS
Section 2.1 discusses the optimization of OSNR by properly
selecting the power level and spectral characteristics of optical source for the
given SSMF fiber attenuation and dispersion characteristics are discussed.
Considering the fiber dispersions such as chromatic dispersion and
polarization mode dispersion and nonlinearities of the fiber such as self phase
modulation (SPM), cross phase modulation (XPM) and four wave mixing
(FWM), the techniques to overcome these effects, EDFA fiber amplifiers and
DCF compensation are included for the desired performance of the OCDMA
system. Dispersion compensation techniques for the single mode fiber are
suggested, which leads to the optimum channel and source conditions to
maximize the OSNR.
The section 2.2 and 2.3 present the issues for mitigation of MAI,
noise, E/D using Super Structured Fiber Bragg Grating (SSFBG), detection
and thresholding schemes for OOK OCDMA and DPSK OCDMA
respectively. Optical and decision thresholding techniques and the
corresponding receiver structures to optimize the BER performance with
varying number of active users and the complexity involved are discussed.
The DPSK OCDMA system with balanced detection and OOK OCDMA
system with power detection are compared. The superior BER performance,
higher receiver sensitivity, merits and demerits of DPSK OCDMA are
presented.
31
2.1 OPTICAL SOURCE AND FIBER CHARACTERIZATION
Dispersion and attenuation are the signal degradation effects
observed in all optical fibers. Dispersion is compensated using dispersion
compensating fiber (DCF) and attenuation is equalized by the erbium doped
fiber amplifiers (EDFA). Various qualitative analyses are carried out in the
simulation for the applications of OOK and DPSK OCDMA systems.
2.1.1 Optical Source and Parameter Selection
Optical fiber communication systems often use semiconductor
optical sources, light emitting diodes (LED) and semiconductor laser diodes
(LD) because of the several inherent advantages offered by them. Some of the
advantages are compact size, high efficiency, good reliability, right
wavelength range, small emissive area compatible with fiber core dimensions
and possibility of direct modulation at relatively high frequencies. The
semiconductor materials with direct band gap energies such as In GaAsP, In P
and GaAs are used for making optical sources. LED and LD are the suitable
optical sources since they have adequate output power for wide range of
applications and the output can be directly modulated resulting in high
efficiency. Surface emitting LEDs operate as Lamberdian source with beam
divergence of 120 in each direction. Edge emitting LEDs have a divergence
of only about 30. The spectral emission width of 40 nm of LED make it
unsuitable for high bit rate system due to the high dispersion caused in the
fiber. In spite of a relatively low output power and a low bandwidth of LEDs
compared to lasers, LEDs are useful for low cost applications with data
transmission at a bit rate of less than 10Mb/s over a few kilometers. Multiple
quantum well (MQW) structures emit light at different wavelengths resulting
in broader spectrum up to 500 nm and are useful for local area WDM
networks. On the other hand laser diodes are coherent light source used to
32
couple sufficiently high power into multimode fiber (MMF) or single mode
fiber (SMF). They are used for 100 Gb/s and more data rate applications.
Narrow spectral emission width, high coupling efficiency and high output
power level are the advantages of LD for high speed application.
Bin Ni and James S. Lehnert (2005) analyzed the performance of
an incoherent temporal spreading OCDMA system with broadband light
sources. Dividing the impact of the non ideal light sources on the system
performances, they had shown that the optimal range for the spreading code
length when the available optical bandwidth and data rate are fixed. Thermal
noise effects on the source were not analyzed. Georg Clarici (2007) presented
the analytical model of laser diode for high speed applications. Simulation of
single mode lasers reproduced all key characteristics for the analysis. Other
types of laser diodes were not analyzed for compression.
Martin Rochette et al (2005) evaluated the upper limit of the
spectral efficiency of OCDMA systems with coherent sources. Spectral
efficiency of 2.24x10-2
b/s/Hz was achieved with a maximum BER of 10-10
in
the direct sequence and phase encoded OCDMA systems. The maximum
spectral efficiency of OCDMA systems with coherent sources was at least a
factor of 5 higher than the OCDMA systems with incoherent sources.
However, the spectral efficiency of systems with incoherent sources
decreased with increasing number of users.
Broader spectral width reduces the spectral efficiency and at higher
power levels the fiber nonlinearities degrade the system performance. To
improve the system performance it is necessary to optimize the source
characteristics.
33
The coherent light source is selected so as to support high data rates
and to provide high spectral efficiency. LD operating in continuous wave is
hereafter referred to as (CW) laser and is the suitable optical source for
OCDMA. The CW laser with narrow spectral emission width of 1nm, line
width of 0.1 MHz and emission power level of 0 dBm at 1551.7 nm is shown
in Figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1 Optical Emission Spectrum of CW Laser
The emission spectrum is measured at resolution bandwidth of
0.01 nm and all polarization set to zero degrees. It is quite suitable for
OCDMA applications and to overcome MAI. After phase modulation using
LiNbO3 - MZM the power level is reduced to 3.290 dBm, which is taken as
the transmitted power for the user. However in the simulation, the power level
is adjusted using variable optical attenuators and EDFA; operating
frequencies are varied in the range from 1540 to 1560 nm for multiple users.
34
2.1.2 Optical Fiber and Parameter Selection
Optical fiber exhibits the least and uniform attenuation in the wide
range of spectrum used for optical communication.
The parameters of the standard single mode fiber (SSMF) used in
all the simulation are as follows
Attenuation of 0.2 dB/km
Wavelength range of 1400 to 1600 nm
Dispersion of 17 ps/nm/km
Dispersion slope of 0.08 ps/nm2/km,
Differential group delay of 3 ps/km and
Allowable nonlinear shift of 5 mrad
SSMF offers a wide bandwidth and data rate in range of tens of
THz. However the possible transmission data rate is reduced due to the
limitations of electronics. Under these conditions, the pulse spreading due to
dispersion mechanisms and fiber nonlinearities degrade the system
performance in the upper band. Chromatic dispersion varies due to the
exponentially decreasing nature of refractive index of the fiber core with
increasing wavelength of operation. Higher wavelength components travel
faster along the fiber leading to pulse spreading in the time domain. In the
waveguide dispersion, the effective refractive index of the fiber varies and the
effective refractive index is inversely proportional to the wavelength of
operation. Because of the material and waveguide dispersion effects the total
dispersion varies from 1 to 20ps/nm-km with zero dispersion around
1310 nm. The fiber nonlinear terms causes frequency mixing as four wave
mixing (FWM), self phase modulation (SPM), cross phase modulation
35
(CPM). In the presence of large electric field, this becomes significant and
generates a new wave introducing cross talk. Stimulated Brillouin Scattering
(SBS) depends on the source power and line width. By proper selection of
optical coherent source characteristics, fiber channel characteristics, data rate
and launched power; the fiber dispersion and nonlinear effects are minimized
within the tolerable level for the given fiber span.
Distributed nonlinearities of optical fibers and OSNR limit the
communication capacity. It was analyzed by Andreas D. Ellis et al (2010) and
suggested techniques to improve the capacity. The techniques are
(i) compensation of intra-channel nonlinearity either through link design or
signal processing, (ii) optimization of OSNR through careful link design and
phase sensitive amplifiers with spacing optimization. However capacity
demands in access network cannot be met with WDM or dense WDM
techniques. Ansgar Steinkamp and Edgar Voges, (2007) analyzed the
influence of polarization dependent losses (PDL) on the statistics of PMD and
statistical interdependencies between first and second order PMD. However,
the effects of PDL are minimal for short haul OCDMA.
All optical data format conversion to and from DPSK were
proposed and numerically demonstrated by Jian Wang et al (2008).
Multicasting, multi channel and ultrahigh speed (160 GB/s) format
conversions were also demonstrated by simulation. However, the deviation to
the actual application was not discussed.Chromatic dispersion limited by the
hybrid ASK-DPSK modulation format were studied by Jian Zhao et el (2007)
for enhancing the transmission reach, also shown that electronic equalization
of ASK and DPSK separately did not improve the CD tolerance of ASK-
DPSK signal. Other modulation formats were not discussed. Comparative
study of the Shannon channel capacity was presented for dispersion free,
36
constant dispersion and variable dispersion of fiber by Jau Tang (2006).
Different approaches were only approximated to the input power levels.
Hofmann et al (2008) worked on WDM PON for higher bandwidth
of operation in the 1550 nm range with a vertical cavity surface emitting laser
arrays. Channel bandwidth of 10 Gb/s over 20 km of SSMF was
demonstrated. However, Laser arrays and maximum bandwidth of 80 Gb/s
were the limiting factors that are not addressed in detail.
Optical signal to noise ratio is to be optimized for the link losses
and distortion using EDFA and DCF. The characteristics and the number of
EDFA and DCF are selected based on the gain and dispersion compensation
respectively for the desired link length of SSMF. Using dispersion shifted
fiber (DSF) the dispersion can be made zero at 1550 nm with suitable
negative or positive dispersion. The same effect is obtained with dispersion
flattened fiber at 1550 nm but provides uniformly constant dispersion from
1300 to 1550 nm.
2.1.2.1 Compensation using fiber Bragg gratings for Single Pulse
Dispersion not only broadens the signal pulse but also reduces the
peak power as shown the Figure 2.2 (a-d). For the bit sequence
0000000100000000, the bit rate of 40 Gb/s and launched power of 0 dBm into
fiber are considered for the analysis. The Gaussian pulse with peak power of
0 dBm at 199 ps and width of the pulse being 55 ps at -60 dBm is launched
into the fiber as shown in the Figure 2.2 (a). The peak power of -26 dBm
centered at 1552.83 nm with the spectral width of 10 nm at -60 dBm of the
spectrum is shown in Figure 2.2 (b). Figure 2.2 (c) shows the dispersion
effects experimented with 10kms length of SSMF. The compensated signal
using FBG is shown in Figure 2.2 (e) and 2.2(f). Launched spectrum itself has
37
the power level of signal 26 dBm as in Figure 2.2(b). The power loss of
2dBm shown in the spectrum is observed after 10 kms of transmission as in
Figure 2(d) for the fiber attenuation of 0.2 dB/km spectral loss was not
compensated by the FBG as in Figure 2.2(f). Launched spectrum itself has the
power level of signal 26dBm as in Figure 2.2(b). The power loss of 2 dBm
shown in the spectrum is observed after 10kms of transmission as in
Figure 2.2(d) for the fiber attenuation of 0.2dB/km.spectral loss was not
compensated by the FBG as in Figure 2.2(f).
(a) Waveform (b) Spectrum
Figure 2.2 (a-b) Launched pulse in time and frequency
38
(c) Waveform (d) Spectrum
Figure 2.2 (c-d) Dispersion effects for 10 km of fiber in time and
frequency
(e) Waveform (f) Spectrum
Figure 2.2 (e-f) Dispersion compensation using FBG
39
FBG has many disadvantages compared to DCF in terms of
complexity involved in making the gratings and stability of operation. Further
the FBG introduces on an average 20dBm of noise in the compensated signal.
DCF characteristics are incorporated during the fiber fabrication process with
the required dispersion coefficient and attenuation for a given length of the
fiber. In the following discussions of the sections of 2.1 the spectral
characteristics not provided. Wavelength drift is not reflected in the spectrum
due to dispersion. Due to the time shift introduced by FBG, the dispersion
compensation left shifts the pulse.
Bette et al (2008) demonstrated the wavelength dependencies of
CD and differential group delay (DGD) to the fiber birefringence value and
derived the gratings. However, did not provide the DGD modeling as it was
complex.
2.1.2.2 Compensation using fiber Bragg Gratings for multiple pulses
Scheme for enhancing the thermal sensitivity of the FBG was
discussed by Budiman Dabarsyah et al (2007). Tuning of group velocity
dispersion (GVD) dispersion slope and wavelength of operation were done by
controlling the temperature distribution of the uniform fiber Bragg grating
(FBG). Dispersion slope was tuned from -8.88 to-24.44 ps/nm2 with the
center wavelength at 1554.5 nm. However, the requirement of circulator and
the changes of GVD as dispersion slope is tuned are the disadvantages of the
scheme.
Similar analysis but with the bit Sequence 0010000110010001 at
the bit rate of 40 Gb/s and 0dBm of power level is carried out. Figures 2.3(a),
2.3(b) and 2.3(c) show the launched, distorted and recovered pulse sequence
after compensation respectively.
40
Figure 2.3 (a) Launched pulse into the fiber
Figure 2.3 (b) Distorted pulse after 10 km of fiber length
41
Figure 2.3 (c) Recovered pulse at the end of 10 km
It is observed that the bits are not properly detectable. Worst
situation occur for 100 km of fiber even with periodically compensating for
dispersion using FBG. Therefore using dispersion compensation unit (DCU)
dispersion compensation is effectively carried out.
2.1.2.3 Compensation using DCF for multiple pulses
To compensate for the attenuation and dispersion so as to maintain
the required OSNR and PCR at the receiver front end, an erbium doped fiber
amplifier (EDFA) and dispersion compensating fiber (DCF) are used. Due to
the performance limitations, single EDFA and DCF cannot serve the purpose.
Therefore the following parameters of EDFA and DCF are selected for the
link with two spans each of 50 kms. Each EDFA in Figure 2.4 provides a gain
of 11.5 dB and with a total gain of 23 dB. The parameters of DCF are as
follows
42
Length of the DCF is 5kms
Attenuation is 0.3dB/km
Dispersion Compensation is 850ps/nm/km
DGD is 0.2 ps/km
Each Span of 50 km consists of one DCF and one EDFA as shown
in Figure 2.4 Two such DCF are used in this scheme and provides a total
dispersion of 170 ps/nm/km.
Figure 2.4 Symmetrical Dispersion Compensation for a span
of 50 km
Optical signal to noise ratio is to be optimized for the link losses
and distortion using EDFA and DCF. The characteristics and the number of
EDFA and DCF are selected based on the gain and dispersion compensation
respectively for the desired link length of SSMF. Using dispersion shifted
fiber, the dispersion can be made zero at 1550 nm with suitable negative or
positive dispersion. The same are the effect with dispersion flattened fiber at
1550 nm but provides uniformly constant dispersion from 1300 to 1550 nm.
For the bit sequence 0010101101001000 at the data rate of 10 Gb/s
and with power level of 10dBm is carried out. The launched pulse into the
fiber is shown in Figure 2.5, the broadened pulse is compensated using DCF
and amplified using EDFA after10 km with overlapping for consecutive 1s is
shown in Figure 2.6. The recovered pulse with compensation and
amplification after the link span of 10 km is given in Figure 2.7.
43
Figure 2.5 The launched pulse into the fiber, clearly distinguishable
at 0 dBm
Figure 2.6 Broadened pulse with overlapping after10 km of fiber
44
The pulse is not distinguishable at 0 dBm as seen from
Figure 2.7 and even at a higher power level (5 dB) too it is barely
distinguishable.
Figure 2.7 Recovered pulse at the end of 10 km
With successive 1s and at higher bit rate, the compensation using
FBG fails to recover the launched pulse as shown in Figures 2.3 (b) and 2.3
(c). There is a difference in power level of 1 dBm. The peak to peak noise
levels were reduced from -12 dBm to -6 dBm as shown in Figures 2.6 and 2.7.
DCF and EDFA for each of the two spans are called as dispersion
compensation unit (DCU). Using the DCU at the transmitting end of the fiber
is pre compensation, at the end of the fiber is post compensation and at the
mid of the total length of the link is symmetrical compensation. Simulation at
different locations of DCU in the fiber is shown in Figure 2.8 for two power
levels and data rates.
45
Figure 2.8 Comparison of eye diagrams for different data rates and
power levels
For each DCU and fiber spans of 50 km which forms a subsystem,
the parameters and the responses are analyzed for the bit sequence
0010101101001000 with 10 Gb/s. The DCF parameters are: 5 km of length,
0.3dB/km of attenuation and dispersion compensation of 170 ps/nm/km with
dispersion slope of 0.11 ps/nm2/km. DGD is taken as 0.2 ps/km. The
parameters of EDFA in the DCU are: gain of 14 dB, noise figure of 4 dB, and
wide noise bandwidth of 13 THz. The launched pulse after modulation is
shown in Figure 2.9 (a). Compensated pulse after the first and second span by
the DCU is shown in Figure 2.9 (b) and 2.9 (c) respectively.
46
Figure 2.9 (a) Gaussian pulse launched into the fiber with 8 dBm of
power
Figure 2.9 (b) Compensated pulses after the first Span
47
Figure 2.9 (c) Compensated pulse after the second Span
The effect of total dispersion, power received and error
performance of the system is obtained and the results are highlighted.
The pulse with 10 dBm of power level at 1552.524 nm (0.01 nm
Resolution bandwidth) is shown in Figure 2.10(a) for 10 Gb/s data rate.
48
Figure 2.10 (a) Spectrum of the Launched optical Pulse
Each span of 50 km of fiber with dispersion compensation is
carried out using DCU. The modulated spectrum and its power level is shown
in Figure 2.10 (b), Figure 2.10 (c) shows the optical spectrum after MZM and
50 km of fiber. Figure 2.10 (d) and Figure 2.10 (e) shows the eye diagram
along with Q factor variation and BER performance respectively. Maximum
Q factor of 10.345, at the decision instant 0.524 of bit period is achieved. The
BER performance after DCU leads to improved power penalty.
49
Figure 2.10(b) Spectrum after MZM
Figure 2.10(c) Optical Spectrum after MZM and 50 km of fiber
50
Figure 2.10 (d) The eye diagram and Q factor variation
Figure 2.10 (e) BER Performance after DCU
51
Therefore for bit rate of more than 10 Gb/s and with the received
power of less than 0 dBm, the symmetrical dispersion compensation leads to
the best BER as shown in Figure 2.8.
2.1.2.4 Minimizing the Effects of Nonlinearities
The fiber nonlinear terms cause frequency mixing as four wave
mixing (FWM), self phase modulation (SPM) and cross phase modulation
(CPM). In the presence of large electric field, this becomes significant and
generates a new wave introducing cross talk. Stimulated Brillouin Scattering
(SBS) depends on the source power and line width. By proper selection of
optical coherent source characteristics and fiber channel characteristics, the
nonlinear effects are minimized within the tolerable level for the given fiber
span.
Analytical expressions for phase and amplitude noises for phase
modulated optical systems due to inter channel four wave mixing (IFWM)
were derived by Alan Pak Tao Lau et al (2008). However, the analysis was
not focused for multiple channel access network applications. Similar analysis
was done by Alper Demir (2007).
Rene-Jean Essiambre et al (2010) described the method to estimate
the capacity limits of optical fiber networks. The sources of noise, Kerr
nonlinearity and mitigation of impairments were described and compared the
capacity limitations. However, the channel capacity for access networks was
not specifically addressed.
PMD monitoring for phase modulated signal using DGD generated
interferometer filter was demonstrated by Yang et al (2008). 0 to 100 ps of
DGD with 20 dB of radio frequency power variation in 20 Gb/s NRZ DPSK
52
system was derived, which was insensitive to 0 to 640 ps/nm of CD.
However, PMD monitoring technique in access network was not discussed.
The fiber nonlinearities and dispersion related issues are studied to
select the power level required for the system. As long as the optical power
within an optical fiber is small, the fiber can be treated as linear medium.
When the power level is high, the impacts of nonlinear effects are to be
considered. Two parameters contributing to this are refractive index related
parameters and scattering related impairments. Some nonlinear effects occur
in multi channel WDM systems where interaction of signals at different
wavelengths is possible.
SPM and XPM affect the phase of signals and cause spectral
broadening, which in turn leads to increases in dispersion penalties. SBS and
SRS provide gains to some channels by depleting power from other channels.
The nonlinear interaction depends on the transmission length and effective
area of the fiber. SPM is a significant consideration in designing 10 Gb/s
systems, and it restricts the maximum channel power to below a 10 dBm.
XPM becomes an important consideration when the channel spacing is tens of
GHz. FWM efficiency depends on signal power and dispersion, as well as
channel separation. If the channel is close to the zero dispersion wavelength
of the fiber, considerably high power can be transferred to FWM components.
Using unequal channel spacing can also reduce effect of FWM. These
findings are confirming with the results of earlier work done in analyzing the
optical fiber characteristics.
Dispersion plays a key role in reducing the effects of nonlinearities.
However, dispersion itself can cause intersymbol interference. In the
following example, the effects of dispersion compensation on system
53
performance in a high power regime where nonlinearities are active are
considered. Two different versions are considered for analysis.
In the first version, the system residual dispersion is 0, whereas it is
800 ps/nm in the second version. The transmission link contains 5 spans and
the bit rate is 10 Gb/s. The dispersion at the end of 100 km SMF is
1700 ps/nm/km and its effective area is 72 square microns. The dispersion of
DCF is -80 ps/nm/km. A 20 km DCF is used for the first version to totally
compensate the dispersion. For the second version, an 18 km DCF is used to
leave some residual dispersion after each span and this add 800 ps/nm total
residual dispersion to the system. The effective area of DCF is 30 square
microns. The loss in SMF and DCF are compensated by an EDFA with 25 dB
of gain for the first version and with 24.4 dB gain for the second version. The
Noise figure of the EDFA is 4 dB. It is found that after about 10 dBm average
power, SPM becomes a limiting effect. Figure 2.11 shows the eye diagrams
for two different residual dispersion values and three different signal powers.
when system residual dispersion is a) 0, b) 800 ps/nm.
Experimented with 10 kms, 50 kms and 120 kms of fiber, hence it
is stated in the respective places. In the entire situation, the DCF is at the
middle (half way between the Tx and Rx) of the fiber link distance. The best
performance are obtained with DCF in the Middle (Symmetrical).This is
compared in the Figures 2.8 for 8 to -16 dBm of power levels and for 2.5 Gb/s
and 10Gb/s.
54
Figure 2.11 Eye diagrams of the received signal for several received
signal powers when system residual dispersion is
a) 0, b) 800 ps/nm for one channel system
This simulation shows that effect of SPM is reduced by incomplete
compensation of the dispersion. It is observed that the power increase results
in closure of the eye in the case of zero residual dispersion.
For multi-channel system with 8 channels, the first channel is at
193.1 THz (1552.524 nm) and the channels are separated by 100 GHz. SMF
and DCF parameters are the same as in the previous example. To get more
accurate results, nonlinear phase shift parameter of the fibers is set to a lower
55
value (3 mrad). Simulation results are shown in Figure 2.12. The eye
diagrams of the received signal for several signal powers with residual
dispersion are 0 and 800 ps/nm respectively.
Figure 2.12 Eye diagrams of the received signal for several signal power
levels. a:0ps/nm of residual dispersion and b:800 ps/nm of
residual dispersion for multi-channel system
For an eight-channel system, the threshold power is approximately
10 dBm per channel. In this simulation, both SPM and XPM affect the system
performance. The simulation also shows that nonlinear effects are reduced by
local dispersion and better performance is obtained with nonzero residual
dispersion.
56
2.2 OOK OCDMA SYSTEM
The simplest technique of simulating the OOK OCDMA system
consists in changing the signal power between two levels, one of which is set
to zero and is often called on-off keying (OOK) to reflect the on-off nature is
the resulting optical signal. Most digital lightwave systems employ OOK.
OOK is identical with the modulation scheme commonly used for incoherent
intensity modulation/direct detection (IM/DD) digital lightwave systems. For
IM/DD systems, such unintentional phase changes are not seen by the
detector, as the detector responds only to the optical power. The situation is
entirely different in the case of coherent systems, where the detector response
depends on the phase of the received signal. The implementation of OOK
format for coherent systems requires the phase of the signal to remain nearly
constant. This is achieved by operating the semiconductor laser continuously
at a constant current and modulating its output by using an external
modulator.
Derivation of non linear equation for electronic dispersion
compensation with OOK modulation using direct detection was carried out by
Gilad Katz et al (2007). Suitability of the scheme for OCDMA system was
derived. However, the same for DPSK and other modulations were not done.
On off keying (OOK) modulation format is used in OCDMA
system for payload data with power detection. The 10 Gb/s data rate through
100 kms of the fiber for OCDMA is very much affected by the attenuation
and dispersion mechanisms of the fiber. The OOK OCDMA system is OSNR
sensitive due to the power detection process at front end of the receiver.
Hence the compensation for the fiber impairments is carried out to optimize
system performance in terms of receiver sensitivity and BER.
57
OCDMA was the powerful alternative to TDMA and WDMA in
fiber-to-the home (FTTH) Systems. Ken-ichi Kitayama et al (2006)
demonstrated the OCDMA system architecture and its operation principle,
code design, optical E/D using a long SSFBG. OCDMA over WDM PON was
proposed. However, improvement towards MAI was not discussed.
Wei-Ren Peng et al (2006) proposed frequency overlapping multi
group scheme for a passive all optical fast frequency hopped (OFFH)
OCDMA system based on FBG array with higher utilization of spectrum.
Users were assigned the codes and divided into several groups with group
interleaving. The interleaving of frequency allocations of different groups
made the groups less correlated, and hence lowering the MAI. However,
Gaussian profile of grating was chosen by Wei-Ren-Peng et al (2006) and did
not suggest an optimum profile for power efficiency and MAI.
2.2.1 OOK OCDMA Schematic Description
Optical laser diode operating at 0dBm power at 1550 nm is used to
modulate the PRBS data using an intensity modulator followed by encoding
using SSFBG. The encoded data from all the users are launched into the fiber
through a star coupler. Other than the desired user, all the remaining users
random data are to contribute for multiple access interference. The
OOK-OCDMA signal gets attenuated at the rate of 0.2dB/km in the SSMF
and also undergoes a dispersion of 17 ps/nm/km. To compensate for this, the
parameters of DCF and EDFA are selected to ensure the required OSNR at
the front end of the receiver. The threshold level is to set at slightly higher
level due to the noise and interference of multiple users. When an optical
threshold is used, the gain and dispersion of the threshold devices are adjusted
to the required optimum value due to the fact that the optical threshold
58
removes the noise, MAI and beat noise to the required extent that the BER is
maintained.
The theoretical block diagram of OOK OCDMA with power
detection system is shown in Figure 2.13 and the electrical domain receiver
structure is shown in Figure 2.14.
Figure 2.13 OOK OCDMA system model
Figure 2.14 Electrical Domain Receiver Structure
Laser diode operating at 1552.5244 nm corresponding to 193.1 THz
with output power of 1 dBm, line width of 0.1 MHz, without polarization
reference and with zero phase generates the optical signal. The data is
generated using an user defined code generator and precoded using one bit
delay precoder to get the DPSK data and applied to the LiNb Mach-Zehnder
modulator (MZM), and the modulated spectrum is shown in Figure 2.15 (b).
The modulated signal is then encoded with a defined code in the encoder, for
the signature of the user which is an 8 bit code of run length 2. This encoded
output corresponds to the desired user. Other 7 such users operating at
59
1554.4564 to 1549.8522 nm with channel spacing of 0.645 nm (0.08 THz
spacing). The 8 user encoded outputs are combined through a star coupler
then to the fiber. The fiber lengths are varied from 50 kms to 600 kms to
study the OSNR obtained at the input of the photodetector. The general
parameters of the system are i) sample rate = 1.3648 THz, ii) number of
samples = 4096, iii) samples per bit = 32, with a sequence length = 128 bits
Encoded signal from the star coupler has the following
characteristics and are shown in the Table.2.3. Single mode optical fiber
(SMF) of length 100 kms with attenuation of 0.22 dB/km, dispersion of
4.46 ps/nm/km and dispersion slope of 0.09 ps/nm2/km operating within the
performance limit at 1200 nm to1700 nm is used in our experiments. Group
velocity dispersion and third order dispersion are considered.
Josep segarra et al (2007) proposed an all optical metro-access
network using WDM/TDM architecture for PON based on optical burst
switching. In the analysis it was shown that the design of optical network
complicated the issues for the QoS. . Method for monitoring of simultaneous
optical signal to noise ratio (OSNR) and chromatic dispersion (CD) in 40
Gb/s WDM systems were proposed and demonstrated by Lamia Baker-
Meflah et al (2007). 20dB of dynamic range of OSNR was measured with
1dB of accuracy for the OSNR values of less than 20dB. The suitability of the
scheme for access network was not discussed.
2.2.2 Multiple Access Interference Analysis
Incoherent system of our proposed model uses 2-D coding schemes
to provide better correlation performance and improved power and bandwidth
efficiency in the asynchronous mode of operation. As analyzed by Xu Wang
and Ken-ichi Kitayama (2004), the received optical field at the input of the
60
(2.3) T
{ } )( . 0
++ = C m
i i d C t n P P T Z
photodetector of the desired user with m interfering signal (0 < m K-1) is
given in equation 2.1, where K is the total number of users in the system.
{ })cos(2)cos(2)(1
1 11
ij
m
i
m
ij
jiidi
m
i
idC PPPPPPTtE +++=
= +==
(2.1)
= Data + MAI + PBN + SBN
where Pd and Pi are data decoded and interfering power respectively. The
values of the terms Pi is not fixed, however a random variable fluctuating
around its average Pi leading to MAI. First term is the data signal, second
term is MAI, third term is primary beat noise (PBN) and the fourth term is
secondary beat noise (SBN); TC is the chip duration and is the
responsivity of the photo detector. Assuming the bandwidth of photo detector
is larger than the frequency difference between the incoming signals and for
smaller numbers of users the interference
di PP /= (2.2)
where, is such that m
61
and n(t) is the photo detector noise included for the completeness of analysis.
The average received signal Z is scaled by TC and approximated as
dC
PmT
Z)1(
)(+=
(2.4)
Assuming that the MAI and receiver noise both have Gaussian distributions,
the error probabilities are derived as
=
0
)(
22
1))(0/1(
mDPerfcmP de (2.5)
+=
1
)1(
22
1))(1/0(
DmPerfcmP de (2.6)
where 0 < D < (1+ m ) is the decision threshold; 0 and 1 are the total noise
variance with mark 0 or 1 respectively.
1,
2222
1 sthMAI ++= (2.7)
0,
2222
0 sthMAI ++= (2.8)
where 2MAI ,2
th and 2
s are the MAI, thermal, and shot noise variances,
respectively. Therefore, setting the optimum threshold level is done (i) by
selecting the large RL and nominal bandwidth to minimize the thermal noise
and (ii) by selecting PIN photodiode for suitable responsivity and TIA to
minimize the shot noise.
62
2.2.3 Optical Thresholder
The decoding process at the receiver generates autocorrelation
peaks from the designated user, and lesser dB level cross correlation peaks
from the non designated users. Optical thresholder (OT) is used to suppress
the MAI and the arrangement consists of the following three components
(i) Highly nonlinear fiber,
(ii) Dispersion compensated EDFA (DC-EDFA) and
(iii) Long pass filter to allow the desired wavelength range.
Functional schematic of OT is shown in Figure 2.15.
Figure 2.15 Optical Thresholder
DC-EDFA compensates for the dispersion and signal loss. One of
the decoder as the desired user matching the code of the corresponding
encoder in the presence of the selected number of interferers is applied to the
optical thresholder.The nonlinear optical thresholder utilizes 500 m of highly
nonlinear fiber (HNLF) with zero dispersion at 1553 nm. The dispersion of
0.19 ps/nm/km at 1550 nm, dispersion slope of 0.026 ps/nm2/km at 1550 nm,
effective area of 10 m2
and non linear coefficient of 20/(W.km) are the other
parameters selected for HNLF. The HNLF shifts spectral power into longer
and shorter wavelengths due to self phase modulation (SPM) and other fiber
63
nonlinearities. The longer wavelengths are passed to the receiver through the
long pass filter.
At the receiver, a power contrast ratio (PCR) of 25dB was
measured between desired user and all the other interferers. The power
measured at the input of the thresholder is the total received power in dBm. In
the thresholder, the DC-EDFA average output power is set to 14 dBm for
single user and the power penalty arises from pulse broadening, residual
dispersion in the encoder and decoder. As the interfering users are added, the
average output power of the thresholder is increased from the DC-EDFA to
keep desired users average power into the HNLF constant. As the number of
users increased, the thresholder output increases from 14dBm depending on
number of users. The HLNF used here is polarization independent.
The measurement emulates adaptive threshold detection consisting
of a DC-EDFA, HNLF and a long pass filter, where DC-EDFA adjust its
pump power level to optimize the threshold detection of the desired user
signal while suppressing the interfering users signal. Each interfering user
contributes a different amount of system penalty due to the differing MAI.
Signal attenuation and dispersion leads to power loss and limits the
transmission distance, OSNR and receiver sensitivity. Electronic
amplification needs optical to Electrical and Electrical to optical conversion
(O-E-O conversion). Electronic amplification depends on the bit rate and
modulation format and hence electronic amplification is neither optically nor
electrically transparent.
All optical amplifiers are used as signal regenerators where loss is
the limitation and single amplifier is be used for multiple channels and
independent of modulation formats. Gain, bandwidth, gain flatness, noise
64
figure, maximum output power, coupling loss, pumping efficiency,
polarization dependence and cross talk are the design parameters of an optical
amplifier and are optimally selected. Gain spectrum of two level systems is
Gaussian slope with peak at a particular wave length.
Optical amplifiers impair the detection of phase modulated signals
due to the interaction of signal and amplifier noise through the Kerr effect as
described by Alan Pak Tao Lau and Joseph M. Kahn (2007). However, the
interplay of chromatic dispersion (CD) and the Kerr effect on signal design
and detection were not investigated. Polarization independent optical
demultiplexing of 160 Gb/s optical TDM based data on cross-phase
modulation (XPM) induced wavelength shifting in highly nonlinear fiber
(HNLF). This has been experimentally demonstrated by Jie Li et al (2008).
However, achieving polarization independency was difficult.
Lijie Qiao et al (2007) described the scheme for maintaining
constant output signal power in the presence of amplified spontaneous
emission (ASE) noise for EDFA. The model was suitable for both single and
multi channel operation for an input power range of 25 dB and a gain of 0 to
37 dB to operate the EDFA. Other than this range was not highlighted. Lee H.
et al (2002) demonstrated an optical thresholder based on a short length of
holey fiber to achieve enhanced code recognition quality in 255 chip
320 Gchip/s SSFBG based OCDMA code/decode system. The nonlinear
thresholder was based on band pass filtering of spectrally broadened
components generated by self-phase modulation (SPM) in an 8.7 m length of
highly nonlinear holey fiber. However, it was not demonstrated for multi-user
OCDMA system.
65
Performance of digital receivers with fixed and adaptive decision
threshold were compared by Benjamin Puttnam et al (2008) in response to
gain transients arising from network operation of gain-clamped EDFA. The
advantages of adaptive decision threshold were given and the complexities
involved were not analyzed.
Anoma D. McCoy et al (2007) studied the semiconductor optical
amplifier (SOA) based noise suppression for SAC-OCDMA system. The
system had the limitation on optical filtering and not suitable for SAC-
OCDMA applications. Thus, forcing the use of erbium doped fiber amplifier
(EDFA) and noise suppression blocks.
Waldimar Amaya et al (2008) presented a time spreading OCDMA
system including non-perfect time gating and optical thresholding for OOK
and DPSK modulation cases. Complexity involved was not analyzed.
The carrier density fluctuations in semiconductor optical amplifier
(SOA) imposed penalties on (i) PSK signals due to nonlinear phase noise and
(ii) OOK signals due to self gain modulation. Francesco Vacondio (2010)
proposed a scheme for equalization of impairments. Other amplifiers were not
discussed. Satoshi Yoshima et al (2010) proposed a novel 10 Gb/s based PON
over OCDMA system to realize full capacity of optical access network. The
system was demonstrated by using multi level PSK, SSFBG, encoder/multi
port decoder and burst mode receiver. However fiber dispersion and
nonlinearities were not addressed in the analysis.
As shown in Figure 2.16, the maximum of EDFA gain of 42 dB
occurs at 1530 nm with the flat gain region being 1540 nm to 1560 nm region.
This feature of EDFA is useful for multiple channel amplification. The power
conversion efficiency is 95.5% at 1480nm pumping and 63.2% at 980 nm
66
pumping for the signal at 1550 nm. Optimum length for doping is selected for
amplification through population inversion as to the pumping signal gets
absorbed along the length of the fiber. The dynamic range of operation is
determined by the input signal power, output signal power and pump power
for the required gain.
Wavelength (m)
Figure 2.16 EDFA Gain variation with Wavelength of operation
Figure 2.17 shows the gain variation with the input power. In the
experiment, the EDFA gain of 14.5 dB is always achieved for the input power
of 1mW (0dBm). Also for 1mW of input power, 52 mW of maximum output
power can be obtained as shown in Figure 2.18. Figure 2.17 and 2.18 are
plotted for 100mW of pump power. Gain up to 30 dB is achieved with the
pump power of 40 mW as seen in the Figure 2.19. The amplified spontaneous
emission (ASE) noise is directly proportional to gain and bandwidth and also
the input signal. ASE is within 1dB in the operating wavelength and it is
removed by properly selecting the gain and bandwidth and a filter is used to
remove the noise outside the bandwidth. The ASE noise interferes with the
detection process in the photo detector and contributes to the output
introducing beat noise.
67
Figure 2.17 EDFA Gain variation with Input Power
Figure 2.18 EDFA Output vs Input Power
Figure 2.19 EDFA Gain variation with Pump Power
68
The Noise figure is given by SNRin/ SNRout, and it is lesser with
1480 nm pumping than the 980nm pumping. Optical signal to noise ratio
(OSNR) is maintained by properly choosing the design parameters for the
given bit rates. The merits of semiconductor optical amplifier (SOA) are
compactness, integration with optoelectronic components, functional
applications and broad choice of operating wavelength. Input power was
maintained constant at 400 mW for plotting the response. The pump power is
varied from 1to 200 mW.
The suitability of EDFA is seen by comparing the values with that
of semiconductor optical amplifier given in the Table 2.1.
Table 2.1 Comparison of Optical Amplifiers: EDFA and SOA
Features EDFA SOA
Typical Maximum
internal gain
30 dB-50 dB 30 dB
Typical Maximum insertion loss 0.1dB-2dB 6 dB-10 dB
Polarization sensitive Not sensitive to
polarization
Sensitive to
polarization
Pump source Optical Electrical
Optical bandwidth 40 nm 30 nm
Maximum output power 23 dBm 20 dBm
Typical intrinsic noise 3-5 dB 7-12 db
2.2.4 OSNR Sensitivity
In optimizing the simulation parameters, the fiber channel OSNR
and Q factor decreases with increasing the distance as in the Figure 2.20. As a
consequence, the BER performance is improved with the OSNR. The rate of
69
change is compensated with suitably selecting the parameters of in-line EDFA
and DCF; The OSNR of 36 dB corresponding to the Q factor of more than 7
is maintained.
(a) BER variation with Q factor
(b) BER variation with OSNR
Figure 2.20 Optimization of OSNR and Q factor for the Fiber
70
2.2.5 Disadvantages
The electrical eye is unsymmetrical for both the cases. The dynamic
decision threshold level setting in electrical domain is a complex problem as
(i) The threshold setting has to change in accordance with the number of users
(ii) Estimating the number of users in an asynchronous environment using
digital signal processing or estimating the higher order harmonic levels of the
received signal (iii) The optimum threshold set for an average number of
users beyond certain level is not proportionate and the BER performance
estimated with noise probability density function is not satisfactory
(iv) Adaptively varying the threshold tends to increase enormously the cost,
complexity in receiver preamplifier design and complexity in thresholder.
And further burst errors degrade the system severely . (v) Alternatively using
cost effective and lesser complex optical thresholding to mitigate MAI and
noise gives more than 4 dB OSNR improvements over the optimum threshold
technique. Thus the performance of OOK OCDMA with optical thresholding
is nearly the same as DPSK OCDMA without thresholding.
2.2.6 Simulation Schematic
Simulation of OOK OCDMA and DPSK OCDMA is demonstrated
using SSFBG E/D in Figure 2.21 shows the simulation setup for the
demonstration and comparative investigation of DPSK OCDMA with OOK
OCDMA. The schematic for generation of multiple access interference is
shown in Figure 2.22. The mode locked laser diode generated ~1.8-ps optical
pulse at a repetition rate of 10 GHz with a central wavelength of
1552.524 nm.
71
Figure 2.21 Shows the arrangement for OOK OCDMA and with DCU
The signal from the OOK modulator was split into two paths. The
upper path is for target OCDMA user with 10 Gb/s OOK modulation using
intensity modulator. The same schematic is used for DPSK OCDMA with
phase modulator instead of intensity modulator. The lower one is used to
generate different number and levels interferences. In the interference path,
the MAI generator can generate interferences with different 1 by tuning the
variable optical attenuators (VOAs) and different K by adjusting the optical
switches.
72
Figure 2.22 Simulation Schematic for MAI generation
Here, 1 is defined as the power contrasts ratio between single
interference and the target signal, and K is the number of interferences. The
signal and the interference are mixed and decoded by the decoder. At the
receiver, a fiber based interferometer followed by a balance detector and a
single PD was used for DPSK and OOK detection, respectively.
2.2.7 Super Structured FBG
The encoders/decoders were written with significant frequency
guard bands between frequency bins. These bins are partition of the available
bandwidth into uniform segments for coding. The original intent of the guard
bands was to reduce multiple-access interface (MAI) by assuring that when
two codes do not have a given bin in common, no energy would leak
through one bin to the other. Many codes are available, but long codes are
usually considered. The assumption of square frequency response leads to the
zeroing out of MAI after balanced detection when using constant cross
73
correlation codes. The encoders and decoders have identical codes, whereas
the complementary decoder consists of the complementary code of the
corresponding encoders.
For a given bit rate, systems with greater optical bandwidth would
offer better performance in terms of BER or, for fixed BER, could
accommodate more uses for greater capacity.
Since intensity noise is the principal noise source, and frequency
guard bands reduce the occupied effective optical bandwidth and, therefore,
the capacity. If ideal rectangular filters could be achieved, the encoders would
carve out truly orthogonal frequency bins while exploiting all available
bandwidth. Realistic FBGs that can be written in an effective manner will
have finite roll off, leading to a tradeoff between MAI and intensity noise.
This tradeoff requires the identification of further constraints on the code
family to achieve optimization. However, simulation is achieved with FBG
spectral responses with various levels of overlap between bins. These spectral
responses are then used to predict the BER floor. The optimum spectral
response is determined and a set of encoders/decoders is realized.
In the experimental setup, encoding/decoding process is achieved
by FBG that is working in transmission. The apodization profile A (z) of an
FBG is the modulation index envelope that will be written in the fiber. The
spectral response of a highly chirped FBG is simply an inverse translation of
the gating apodization profile along the z-axis of the fiber. Basically, no
modulation index (A=0) leads to a transmission bin, whereas a modulation
index (A=1) leads to a non transmission bins, i.e., a reflective bin. An
apodization profile based on super-Gaussian lobes is used in order to
minimize the ripples in spectral response that cause MAI.
74
The encoder is an SSFBG working in transmission that takes a
broadband source and filters out all spectral content, expect those frequencies
included in the users unique spectral code. All the users in the system share
the same optical bandwidth and contain frequency elements for the same
band; they access the channel asynchronous and without coordination. An
N1 coupler is used to combine all signals onto one fiber.
The duration of the encoded signal and the decoded signal are about
800 ps and 1.6 ns, respectively. Therefore, in the interference path, the data
rate is intentionally converted to 622 Mb/s to avoid the inter symbol
interference. However as in the signal path the data are transmitted at 10 Gb/s
data rate, the interference results in the performance degradation. But on the
performance comparison, interference is considered as a fixed level
interference to the received signal and neglected by taking all the
measurement against the relative interference level 1, which is proportional
to the absolute interference level
Figures 2.23 to 2.35 show the simulation results for the E/D for the
desired user for various conditions indicated in the relevant figures.
Photodetector 1 (PD 1) is in the upper arm and photodetector 2 (PD 2) is in
the lower arm of the differential detection scheme.
75
Figure 2.23 Encoded Spectrum after the 1st SSFBG encoder
Figure 2.24 Encoded spectrum at the input of Star coupler for the
Desired user
76
Figure 2.25 Encoded signal at the input of star coupler
Figure 2.26 Encoded signal at the input of Star coupler for the Desired
user
77
Figure 2.27 Decoded signal after 1st SSFBG
Figure 2.28 Decoded Spectrum at the input of PD 1
78
Figure 2.29 Decoded Spectrum at the input of PD 2
Figure 2.30 Waveform at the input of PD2
79
Figure 2.31 Waveform at the input of PD1
Figure 2.32 Spectrum after Star coupler
80
Figure 2.33 Waveform after Star coupler
Figure 2.34 Reflected spectrum from the 1st SSFBG in the PD2
81
Figure 2.35 Reflected spectrum from the 2nd
SSFBG in the PD2
The schematic in Figure 2.34 shows the complete arrangement
carried out for OOK OCDMA and programmable decoder for multiple users
with DCU. This scheme simulates the OOK OCDMA system with intensity
modulator and direct detection using PIN photodetector. At different stages of
the proposed schematic, the signal and its spectrum are taken but their
inferences are not given. Also, why the difference in the power level between
signal and spectrum
2.3 DPSK OCDMA SYSTEM
The use of PSK format requires that the phase of the optical carrier
remain stable so that phase information can be extracted at the receiver
without ambiguity. This requirement puts a stringent condition on the
tolerable line widths of the transmitter laser and local oscillator. The line
width requirement can be somewhat relaxed by using a variant of the PSK
82
format, known as differential phase-shift keying (DPSK). In the case of
DPSK, information is coded by using the phase difference between two
neighboring bits. For instance, if k represents the phase of the kth bit, the
phase difference = k-k-1 is changed by or 0 depending on whether kth
bit is a 1 or 0 bit. The advantage of DPSK is that the transmittal signal can be
demodulated successfully as long as the carrier phase remains relatively stable
over the duration of two bits.
Bartlomiej Kozicki et al (2008) demonstrated a flexible optical
performance monitoring (OPM) method for phase modulated signals. The
OSNR was measured within the range of 20 to 35dB with accumulated CD
between -600 and +600ps/nm and PMD precisely for high capacity optical
networks. OPM method supported NRZ, RZ-DPPSK and RZ-DQSK formats.
However, the complications in the measurement method were not addressed.
Choi et al (2008) described a method for in-band OSNR monitoring
of DPSK and differential quadrature phase shift keying (DQPSK) signals by
analyzing the spectrum obtained from self heterodyne detection. The
technique was insensitive to the effects of CD and PMD. Complexity
involved was not addressed. DPSK receiver design applied to strong optical
filtering for NRZ and RZ modulation formats were analyzed by Christian
Malouin et al (2007). For NRZ-DPSK, the measured OSNR penalty was
obtained for a perfect one bit DI.
Asynchronous demodulation cannot be used in the case of PSK
format because the phase of the transmitter laser and the local oscillator are
not locked and can drift with time. A variant of PSK, known as DPSK, can be
demodulated by using an asynchronous DPSK receiver. However the use of
the DPSK format permits asynchronous demodulation by using delay scheme.
The idea is to multiply the received bit stream by a replica of it that has been
83
delayed by one bit period. The resulting signal has a component of the form
cos(k-k-1), where k is the phase of the kth bit, which can be used to recover
the bit pattern since information is encoded in the phase difference k-k-1.
Such a scheme requires phase stability only over a few bits and can be
implemented by using DFB semiconductor lasers. The filtered current is
divided into two parts, and one part is delayed by exactly one bit period. The
product of two currents contains information about the phase difference
between the two neighboring bits and is used by the decision current to
determine the bit pattern. The BER calculation is more complicated for the
DPSK case because the signal is formed by the product of two currents.
Hideaki Furukawa et al (2010) demonstrated optical packet
switching and buffering operation of dense wavelength division multiplexing
(DWDM)/NRZ-DPSK with optical payload data rate of 640 Gb/s (64
wavelength x 10 Gb/s). Interference level of DPSK and detailed comparison
to OOK was not carried out.
All optical data format conversion to and from DPSK were
proposed and numerically demonstrated by Jian Wang et al (2008).
Multicasting, multi channel and ultrahigh speed (160 GB/s) format
conversions were also demonstrated by simulation. However, the deviation to
the actual application was not discussed. Chromatic dispersion limited by the
hybrid ASK-DPSK modulation format were studied by Jian Zhao et el (2007)
for enhancing the transmission reach, also shown that electronic equalization
of ASK and DPSK separately did not improve the CD tolerance of ASK-
DPSK signal. Other modulation formats were not discussed.
Mohammad Alfiad et al (2008) demonstrated the DPSK receiver
employing MZI with less than one bit delay. The enhanced CD tolerance of
84
4000 ps/nm at 2 dB penalty was achieved for 10.7 Gb/s NRZ-DPSK. Other
than one bit delay was difficult to achieve.
The block schematic of DPSK OCDMA system is shown in
Figure 2.36. The optical laser diode is driven by the clock waveform to
generate 1.8 ps pulses at a repetition rate of 10 GHz with a central wavelength
of 1552.24 nm. This laser source waveform is modulated using a phase
modulator (PM) in accordance with the DPSK encoded data. DPSK data is
obtained from pseudorandom bit sequence generator in NRZ format. This
NRZ data is encoded using a precoder and phase modulated with the laser
output. The phase modulated DPSK signal is further encoded using OCDMA
encoder corresponding to the desired user by the OCDMA encoder. All the
other OCDMA encoded signals are MAI corresponding to 31 users which are
coupled to the fiber through a star coupler. DPSK OCDMA decoder and one
bit delay Mach Zehnder delay Interferometer (MZI) with balanced detection
is used at the receiving end. The decoder performs the reverse operation of
OCDMA encoder.
Simulation of DPSK OCDMA is carried out using the schematic
shown in Figure 2.21 through the following modifications (i) replacing the
Intensity Modulator (IM) by a Phase modulator (PM) and (ii) replacing the
single photodetector by the Balanced Modulator. However the simulation
schematic remains the same as given in Figure 2.22.
85
Figure 2.36 DPSK-CDMA systems
Commonly used external modulator makes use of LiNbO3
waveguides in a Mach-Zehnder (MZ) configuration. The performance of
external modulators is quantified through the on-off ratio, called extinction
ratio and the modulation bandwidth. LiNbO3 modulators provide an on-off
ratio in excess of 20 and can be modulated at speeds up to 75 GHz. The
driving voltage is typically 5 V but can be reduced to near 3 V with a suitable
design. Other materials can also be used to make external modulators. A
polymeric electro-optic MZ modulator requires only 1.8 V for shifting the
phase of a 1550 nm signal by in one of the arms of the MZ interferometer.
Kang et al (2008) demonstrated all optical byte pattern recognition
embedded in PSK data streaming at 40 Gb/s and used matched filtering to
generate autocorrelation pulse. Reconfigurable Silica Planar Lightwave
Circuit (PLC) delay line filter based correlation filter complicated the system
hardware. Performance of 40 Gb/s DPSK demodulator in silicon-on-insulator
(SOI) was presented by Karsten Voigt et al (2008). The delay interferometer
manufactured in 4 m rib waveguide was presented for operation at 1550 nm.
Although advanced temperature control for real applications was not carried
out. Teh et al (2002) reported the fabrication and application of 255 chip
86
320 Gchip/s quaternary phase SSFBG for optical code generation and
recognition in a four channel WDM/OCDM. However, the SSFBG was used
with fixed codes.
In the simulation work, 31 active users are included to characterize
the interference. The simulation is carried out with and without optical
thresholder (OT) as given in section 2.2.3 for DPSK OCDMA. The
combination of optical thresholder with MZI and pin photo detectors used for
balanced detection suppresses the MAI. DPSK OCDMA is superior to OOK
OCDMA with advantages of improved receiver sensitivity, better tolerance to
beat noise and multiple access interference without optical and dynamic
threshold setting. Differentially phase coded OCDMA systems are susceptible
to coherent beat noise and MAI. Differentially Phase coding scheme require
additional components and the system complexity is also increased due to
laser diode phase noise and coherence problems. Sensitivity at high data rates
is affected by the noise of the source and interference level of the system.
2.3.1 Generation of DPSK Signal
The schematic to generate the DPSK signal in shown in the
Figure 2.37.
87
Figure 2.37 Generation of DPSK Signal
Laser diode operating at 1552.5244 nm corresponding to 193.1 THz
with output power of 0dBm, line width of 0.1 MHz, without polarization
reference and with zero phases generates the optical signal. The data is
generated using a PRBS generator and precoded using one bit delay precoder
to get the DPSK data and applied to the LiNb Mach-Zehnder modulator
(MZM) to obtain the modulated spectrum.
The modulated signal is then encoded with super structured fiber
Bragg grating (SSFBG) in the encoder. This encoded output corresponds to
the desired user. Other users operating from 1550 nm with channel spacing of
0.645 nm (0.08 THz spacing).All the encoded outputs are combined through a
star coupler and then to the fiber. The fiber lengths are varied from 50 kms
to 100 kms to study the OSNR obtained at the input of the photodetector. The
88
general parameters of the system are i) sample rate = 1.3648 THz, ii) number
of samples = 4096, iii) samples per bit = 32, with a sequence length = 128
bits. Encoded signal from the star coupler has the following characteristics
and are shown in the Table 2.2.The electrical eye diagram characteristics are
given in Table 2.3. Table shows the maximum and minimum values of the
encoded signal and noise for any of the possible number of users (encoders)
Table 2.2 Encoded signal characteristics
Signal power
(dBm)
Noise power
(dBm) OSNR(dB)
Minimum Value -6.5226704 -12.03328 2.0042
Maximum value -6.2082046 -8.7438653 5.5679
Ratio of Max/min 0.53143461 3.2893425 3.2893
Table 2.3 Eye Diagram Comparison
Parameters
Eye Characteristics
for DPSK OCDMA
(a.u)
Eye Characteristics
for OOK OCDMA
(a.u)
Maximum Q factor 3.838 2.871
Minimum BER 5.943e-5 170.1e-5
Eye height 0.1982e-6 - 1.824e-6
Threshold level - 9.103e-6 14.60e-6
Decision instant 0.458 0.703
89
2.3.2 E/D with Walsh Code
The encoders and the decoder are composed of fiber pigtailed
bulk-optics-based femtosecond pulse shapers. Briefly, the encoded data
streams are collimated onto diffraction gratings, spatially spreading out the
spectral components of the incident pulses. The spread spectrum is incident
upon a spatial light phase modulator (SLPM), which applies a phase shift to
different portions of the spectrum, as designated by the OCDMA codes.
Additional phase shifts are applied to compensate for dispersion in
transmission fiber components and bulk optic components, collimators are
employed. Ultimately, the eight encoder channels and single decoder require
only a pair of pulse shapers. After reflecting back into the fiber, circulators
route the encoded signals through the remainder of the system. All OCDMA
encoded data sets then combine to single decoder that applies the conjugate
phase code of the desired signal. Since both the circulator and the diffraction
grating of the pulse shapers are polarization, the decoder doubles as a
polarization. The equivalent functions can be performed using compact and
fiber-based arrayed waveguide gratings, which can spread and recombine the
spectrum.
FBG based E/D for the 2-D time-spreading/wavelength hopping
optical coding was proposed by Ye Zhang et al (2008). FBG based codes
were given and the spectral analysis were also carried out. However, the
OCDMA system was tested at the data rate of 5Gb/s only. Petropoulos et al
(2001) investigated the benefits of using time gating in the detection process
for OCDMA system that comprises of bipolar 64-chip long SSFBG encoders
and decoders. It was shown that correlation combined with time gating
detection provided resilience to the distorting effects of dispersion and MAI.
However, the number users and the data rate were minimal for the OCDMA
system analyzed.
90
Huiszoon et al (2007) presented the integrated device that
performed the cost-effective parallel encoding and decoding (E/D) in SAC-
OCDMA. However, the performance analysis were not presented or
compared with other types of E/D. Julien Penon et al (2007) developed the
methodology for numerical optimization of frequency response of FBG, and
maximized the capacity of spectral amplitude coded OCDMA (SOC-
OCDMA). Optical encoders were realized and demonstrated for the
incoherent SAC-OCDMA system with seven simultaneous users. However,
error free operation (BER
91
transimpedance amplifier (TIA). These parameter values are chosen for the
application at 1.5 m instead of 2 m.
A Balanced receiver was demonstrated to Suppress nonlinearities
by Alexander et al (2008). However their works were in the frequency range
of MHz only for IM/DD.
Uni-traveling carrier photodiode (UTC) and traveling wave photo
detector were described by Andreas Beling et al (2008) for more than
100GHz applications. These are not essential for OCDMA system with BD.
However, for detection at high date rates of more than 80 Gb/s the traveling
wave photo detector is suitable.
PMD insensitive and dispersion tolerant in - band OSNR monitor
based on beat noise measurement was demonstrated by Bakaul (2008).
Balanced receivers limited the suitability for high speed applications.
Yannick Keith Lize et al (2007) demonstrated the technique for a
simultaneous CD and PMD monitoring method using a partial bit delay in
MZI. The technique increases CD monitoring sensitivity by a factor of two
for NRZ intensity modulation format and a factor of five for a DPSK
modulation format. However, realizing partial delay in MZI was critical.
Xin Chen et al (2007) analyzed lumped dispersion compensation
for 40 Gb/s RZ-DPSK transmission. The scheme was flexible simple and low
cost solution for DPSK link design. However, OCDMA network analysis was
not made. Ilya Lyubomirsky et al (2008) proposed and analyzed differential
quadrature phase shift keying (DQPSK) receiver architecture based on optical
frequency discriminator filtering and direct detection for enhanced CD
tolerance. However, OSNR sensitivity was poor.
92
The balanced detector for DPSK OCDMA is illustrated in
Figure 2.38. Balanced detection eliminates MAI for codes with fixed cross
correlation, leaving only intensity noise. The upper arm contains an FBG with
the decoder identical to the encoder for the data to be received. In the lower
arm, the complementary decoder is orthogonal to the encoder spectral
response. It contains only the frequency bins that are not present in the
encoder. An optical attenuator is inserted to achieve balanced detection and is
adjusted according to the used codes.
Figure 2.38 Balanced Detection Scheme
Optimum source and fiber characteristics are analyzed for the OCDMA
system. Performance of OOK OCDMA system is analyzed with optical
thresholding and direct detection. DPSK OCDMA system with balanced
detection is analyzed.