Upload
lexi-rusten
View
225
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NEES-Pile: Experimental and Computational Study of Pile Foundations Subjected to
Liquefaction-Induced Lateral Spreading
COMPARISON BETWEEN CENTRIFUGE AND REAL SCALE MODEL TESTS:
LG0 - SG1By
Student: Marcelo GonzalezProfessor: Tarek Abdoun
Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteAugust 20th, 2007
Table of Contents
BUFFALO REAL SCALE
Water, 1 cpK= 1E-2 cm/secDR = 55%
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
1. SIMULATION OF LG0
1.1 Model configuration, soil properties, Instrumentation and centrifuge model preparation.
1.2 Input acceleration.1.3 Time History responses.1.4 Stress – Strain responses.
2. SIMULATION OF LG0
2.1 Model configuration, soil properties, Instrumentation and centrifuge model preparation.
2.2 Input acceleration.2.3 Time History responses and profiles of the data.2.4 Stress – Strain responses.
3. DISCUSSION
SIMULATIONLG0
BUFFALO REAL SCALE
Water, 1 cpK= 1E-2 cm/secDR = 55%
SIMULATION OF LG0
Soil Properties and InstrumentationLG0
0102030405060708090
100
0.01 0.1 1
Particle size, mm
% S
oil
pa
ss
ing
RPI F55
BUFFALO F55
D50 = 0.258 mmD10 = 0.155 mmFC = 0.1%e min = 0.608e max = 0.800Gs = 2.665K = 1 x 10-2 cm/sec, 40%DR
(Gonzalez M., 2006)
Model ConfigurationLG0
Pore PressureLVDT Accelerometer X Accelerometer Y
0 cm
21.5 cm (5.38 m)
19 cm (4.75 m)
14 cm (3.50 m)
6.0 cm (1.50 m)
LeftRight
7.5 cm (1.88 m)
High Speed Camera
Model PreparationLG0
BUFFALO REAL SCALE
sand
Latex Membrane
acelerometer
Dry sand pluviation method
Ottawa sand
Outer chamber
(vacuum = 100 kPa)
Outer
(100 kPa)
Latex Membrane
acelerometer
Model Saturation System
Ottawa sand
Chamber Vacuum Inner (90 kPa)
Results: Input AccelerationLG0
INPUT ACCELERATION
TIME CONSIDERED IN THE ANALISIS
Results: Acceleration in the ringsLG0
INPUT ACCELERATION
ACR5
ACR4
ACR3
ACR2
ACR1
Results: Acceleration in the soilLG0
INPUT ACCELERATION
ACCR5
ACCR4
ACCR3
ACCR2
ACCR1
Results: Excess Pore Water PressureLG0
INPUT ACCELERATION
PWC5,PWU3
PWC4, PWD2
PWC3, PWU2
PWC2, PWD1
PWC1, PWU1
Results: Excess Pore Water Pressure Dissipation
LG0
INPUT ACCELERATION
PWC5,PWU3
PWC4, PWD2
PWC3, PWU2
PWC2, PWD1
PWC1, PWU1
Results: Lateral Displacement in the soilLG0
INPUT ACCELERATION
LVR5
LVR4
LVR3
LVR2
LVR1
0 5 10 15 20 25-3-2-10123
LVR2, depth 4.75m poln3x, depth 4.57m pols3x, depth 4.57m
0 5 10 15 20 25-3-2-10123
LVR3, depth 3.50m poln8x, depth 3.35m pols8x, depth 3.35m
0 5 10 15 20 25-3
-2-1
0
12
3
Horizontal Displacement
Ho
rizo
nta
l Dis
pla
cem
en
t, m
m
LVR4, depth 1.88m poln13x, depth 1.83m pols13x, depth 1.83m
Results: Stress – Strain LoopsLG0
0-12sec
GSI 1.0
Strain – Stress LoopsCalculated by considering Soil Accelerometers and Inertia of the ring correction
Results: Shear Wave VelocityLG0
Centrifuge University of Buffalo
No ring inertia effect No degradation effect
No ring inertia effect No degradation effect
A. Elmekati, 2007 A. Elmekati, 2007
SIMULATIONSG1
SIMULATION OF SG1
Results: Strain – Stress LoopsLG0
The same configuration and preparation method than LG0 was used to create SG1.
The only difference was the inclination angle.
Model inclination angle = 2 degrees
Prototype inclination angle = 5 degrees
Results: Input AccelerationSG1
Results: Acceleration in the ringsSG1
2.25m, ACR4
5.38m, ACR1
4.75m, ACR2
3.50m, ACR3
1.50m, ACR5
INPUT ACCELERATION
Results: Acceleration in the soilSG1
2.25m, ACCR4
5.38m, ACCR1
4.75m, ACCR2
3.50m, ACCR3
1.50m, ACCR5
INPUT ACCELERATION
Results: Excess Pore Water PressureSG1
2.25m, PWC4
5.38m, PWC1
4.75m, PWC2
3.50m, PWC3
1.50m, PWC5
INPUT ACCELERATION
Results: Lateral Displacement in the soilSG1
2.25m, LVR4
5.38m, LVR1
4.75m, LVR2
3.50m, LVR3
1.50m, LVR5
INPUT ACCELERATION
Results: Lateral Displacement in the soilSG1
2.25m, LVR4
5.38m, LVR1
4.75m, LVR2
3.50m, LVR3
1.50m, LVR5
INPUT ACCELERATION
Event1 (E1): Between 5.30 and 5.6 secEvent2 (E2): Between 5.75 and 6.0 secEvent3 (E3): Between 6.20 and 7.3 secEvent4 (E4): Between 25.0 and 30.0 sec
E1E2
E3
Results: Lateral Displacement in the soilSG1
2.25m, LVR4
5.38m, LVR1
4.75m, LVR2
3.50m, LVR3
1.50m, LVR5
INPUT ACCELERATION
Event1 (E1): Between 5.30 and 5.6 secEvent2 (E2): Between 5.75 and 6.0 secEvent3 (E3): Between 6.20 and 7.3 secEvent4 (E4): Between 25.0 and 30.0 sec
E4
Results: Lateral Displacement in the soilSG1
Results: Lateral Displacement in the soilSG1
4sec 5.5sec 6sec 27sec
Results: Stress – Strain LoopsSG1
GSI 1.0
Strain – Stress LoopsCalculated by considering Soil Accelerometers and Inertia of the ring correction
SAANO RING CORRECTION
Results: Shear Wave VelocitySG1
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 50 100 150 200
Vs (m/s)
De
pth
(m
)
centrifuge University of Buffalo
A.Elmekati, 2007
Discusion SG1
Thank you