4
Preference Groupings Y our type is de termined by your responses to the questions on the MBTI. Since each of the eight pref- erences are represented by a letter (E, l, S, , T, F, J, or P), a four-letter code can be used as a s horth a nd for indicating type. For example, ESTJ suggests a person who is energized by the external world ( E) , whose preferred way of perceiv- ing incoming information is Sensing (S), whose way of de- ciding is Thinking (T) , and who adopt s a Judgin g U) style of livin g. An individual type is the combination of one preference from each of the four preference pairs, or dichotomie s. When the four dichotomies are combined in all possible ways, sixteen types result. These sixteen types are displayed on a type table. On ce you are familiar with how the type table is con structed, you can look at the data a nd quickly form impressions of or hyp ot heses abo ut th e group that is displayed on the tabl e. The type table is arranged as follows: Int roversion in the top two rows and Extraversion in the bottom two rows Sensing in the two left co lumns and Intuition in the two right co lumns Thinking in the two o ut er co lumn s and Feel ing in th e two inn er co lumn s Judging in the top and bottom rows and Perceiving in the inside rows People who work with type like to group the preferences together in differe nt ways that are meaningful to them and Type Table s s N N ISTJ ISF j INF j INTJ p ISTP ISFP INFP INTP p E ESTP ESFP ENFP ENTP E ESTJ E SF j EN F j ENTJ T F F T to their task. Here are three co mmon groupin gs of the pref- erences: by quadrants of th e type table, by function pairs (or co lumns) of the type table, and by temperame nts. The Four Quadrants One combination o ft en used to describe personality type re lates to the quadrants of the type table. These quadrant s combine the energizing preferences (E- 1) and the perceiv- ing preferences (S-N) and result in IS, ES , IN, a nd EN quadra nt s. The quadrants are often used to describe leader- ship, lea rning, and work styles as well as corporate c ultur e and ways of handling change. 5

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Test - Preference Groupings

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    15

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Test - Preference GroupingsY our type is determined by your responses to the
questions on the MBTI. Since each of the eight pref­
erences are represented by a letter (E, l , S, , T, F, J , or P), a
four-letter code can be used as a shorthand for indicating
type. For example, ESTJ suggests a person who is energized
by the external world (E) , whose preferred way of perceiv­
ing incoming information is Sensing (S), whose way of de-
ciding is Thinking (T) , and who adopts a Judging U) style
of living.
An individual type is the combina tion of one preference from each of the four preference pairs, or dichotomies. When the four dichotomies are combined in all possible ways, sixteen types result. These sixteen types are displayed on a type table. Once you are familiar with how the type table is constructed, you can look at the data and quickly form impressions of or hypotheses about the group that is displayed on the table. The type table is arranged as follows:
Introversion in the top two rows and Extraversion in the bottom two rows
Sensing in the two left columns and Intuition in the two right columns
Thinking in the two outer columns and Feeling in the two inner columns
Judging in the top and bottom rows and Perceiving in the inside rows
People who work with type like to group the preferences together in different ways that are meaningful to them and
Type Table
pISTP ISFP INFP INTP
E ESTJ ESF j EN Fj ENTJ
T F F T
to their task. Here are three common groupings of the pref­ erences: by quadrants of the type table, by function pairs (or columns) of the type table, and by temperaments.
The Four Quadrants
One combination often used to describe personality type re lates to the quadrants of the type table. These quadrants combine the energizing preferences (E-1) and the perceiv­ ing preferences (S-N) and result in IS, ES , IN, and EN quadrants. The quadrants are often used to desc ribe leader­ ship , lea rning, and work styles as well as corporate culture and ways of handling change.
5
~ ~
Leadership
• Quiet, reflective, thoughtful
Administrative focus: procedures are followed and exceptions noted
• Reliance on written words and policies
Practical considerations
What can be appl ied to current or anticipated needs
By reading and observing
Continuity, such as in administration and accounting
Comes from seeing the difference between what should be preserved and what could be changed
"Let's keep it!" *
Quiet, reflective, thoughtful
Reliance on written words and research
Intangible thoughts and ideals
Learning for learning's sake; for the joy of creating something new
By reading and reflecting
Comes internally from their visions of the future
"Let's think about it differently!" *
ES -Action-Oriented Realist EN -Action-Oriented Innovator
Leadership Through action, doing Through enthusiasm
Work environment Energetic, outgoing, active
• Hours that are regular and scheduled
Implementation focus: time is spent out and about doing what works
Reliance on spoken words leading to action
Energetic, outgoing, active
Hours that can be sporadic with bursts of energy
Cutting edge focus: time is spent out there trying new things
Reliance on spoken words leading to possibilities
Individual focus Practical actions Systems and relationships
Learning focus What is relevant that will help me do my job better now
What is engaging and fun that feeds my creativity and insight
Learning process By doing By talking/acting through ideas
Organizational focus Results, such as in sales, production, and manufacturing
Change, such as in marketing, promotions, and new ventures
Change Comes from getting things to run more effectively and efficiently
Comes from trying something different or novel
Motto "Let's do it!"* "Let's change it! "*
*Mattos are excerpted from Organizational Tendencies by Earle C. Page, Center for Applications of Psychological Type , 1985.
6
There may be some creative tension between the diago­ nals (IS versus EN and IN versus ES). For example, while the ISs are saying "If it ain't broke, don't fix it! " the ENs say "If it ain't broke, break it! " The INs may be so busy envi­ sioning a possibility that they overlook the steps involved in its implementation-a forte of the ESs.
All four perspectives are needed and are valuable to orga­ nizations. When one or more perspectives are missing, organizational members can use the chart on page 6 to see what or where to supplement their view to ensure an opti­ mal outcome. This does not mean that an organization needs to add a "missing type" to its group; rather, members should be encouraged to use all preferences.
The Four Function Pairs
These combinations of preferences (ST, SF, NF, NT) are also known as the fun ction pairs and correspond to the columns of the type table. They are often related to communication style, problem solving, career choice, and organizational culture.
All four perspectives add value to an organization. When one or more perspectives are missing, people can use the chart below to supplement their view to ensure an opti­ mal outcome.
Preference Grouping by Function Pairs (ST, SF, NF, NT) orType Table Columns
ST SF NF NT
ST SF NF NT
People who prefer SENSING+ SENSING+ INTUITION+ INTUITION+ THINKING FEELING FEELING THINKING
Focus on What is ; the facts What is; the facts What could be; What could be; the possibilities the possibilities
Contribute Policies and procedures Internal and external Ideals worth striving for Theoretical concepts customer service
Have as a goal Efficiency Helping others Empowerment Mastery
Ask questions about How will it be done, Who will it affect, How will it be com- What is the latest and by when, and how much who will do it, and how? municated and who most relevant theory does it cost? will it impact? or strategy?
Like computers for Keeping track of data Keeping track of data, Aiding growth and Modeling and simulating especially data relating development of self to people and others
Experience conflict When work is not When people disagree When values are When principles are done correctly ignored or crossed incorrect or faulty
Reduce conflict by Having the structures Meeting people's needs Articulating values Making sure the in place clearly principles are sound
Want teams to focus on Bottom line Offering support Giving encouragement Systems
May be found Government, Service, Communication, arts, Start-up technologies, in these types of production, health care, counseling and scientific, organizations construction education development academic
7
The Four Temperaments
A third useful way of grouping preferences is referred to as temperament. Temperament
Is based primari ly on observable clusters of behavior, which may be seen as "activity patterns"
Describes differences in people noticed and documented throughout history in a variety of cultures, including Greek and Native American
Has four variations, not sixteen, and therefore the themes are even easier for people to grasp quickl y
Can be determined by the MBTl
Temperaments can be found in the type table as shown at right .
Preference Grouping by Temperaments (SJ, SP, NF, NT)
Temperament SJ-Guardians SP-Artisans
Effects of Combinations of Preferences byTemperaments (SJ , SP, NF, NT)
NT
NF-Idealists NT-Rationals
consolidator negotiator, firefighter energizer systems, builder
Work style Has a_sense of duty, Acts with cleverness Persuades people Adds ingenuity and responsibility, loyalty, and timelessness about values and logic to ideas and and industry inspirations actions
To do best work, Knowledge of the goal Freedom to do things Personal meaning and Intriguing models to they need and what they're supposed as they see fit congruence with who challenge their
to do to get there they are imagination
Learning style Step-by-step, Active involvement Personalized and Impersonal and with preparation to meet current imaginative ways of analytical process for for current and needs self-awareness personal mastery future utility
Want others to Hardworking Resourceful and Authentic and Competent and see them as and reliable risk taking inclusive logical
Acknowledged Administrative Expeditious Something Strategic for contributing expertise, timely handling of the unique or a analysis of
output out-of-the- special vision complex issues ordinary and the of possibilities unexpected
Want to be Dependability Spontaniety that Ability to Expertise known for their includes a spirit inspire ochers
of play
Can get into Too bureaucratic Too expedient Too idealistic Too competitive trouble by being
8