Upload
phamliem
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
©Trevor Roberts Associates specialists in training for the planning service
PLANNING ENFORCEMENT - THE
MOST COMPLEX AND LITIGIOUS
PART OF THE PLANNING PROCESS
ENFORCING PLANNING
CONDITONS
Presented by Vivien Green
on behalf of
PIPA Conference
Friday 25th October 2013
©Trevor Roberts Associates specialists in training for the planning service
WHAT CONSTITUTES A BREACH
OF PLANNING CONTROL?
Town and Country Planning Act 1990:
(a) carrying out development without the required
planning permission;
or
(b) failing to comply with any
condition or limitation subject
to which planning permission
has been granted
©Trevor Roberts Associates specialists in training for the planning service
• Breach of Planning Control is NOT A CRIMINAL OFFENCE
(NB: breaches in the Listed Building/Advertisement/
Protected Trees regimes are)
• a lot of Compliance/Enforcement Officers’ time is spent on
investigations to gather EVIDENCE to establish a breach
• then on trying to resolve the breach/secure compliance
rather than taking punitive action
• ONLY WHEN A PLANNING ENFORCEMENT
NOTICE or a BREACH OF CONDITION
NOTICE has come into effect and has not
been complied with is there a CRIMINAL
OFFENCE
©Trevor Roberts Associates
“DISCRETION”
• it is often said that “enforcement” is discretionary
• BUT - dealing with complaints
about breach of planning control is
NOT DISCRETIONARY somebody
in the council has to do it or there
will be serious consequences
• making a fully reasoned and justified assessment of the
evidence and deciding whether or not it is EXPEDIENT to
enforce against an unauthorised development is NOT
DISCRETIONARY it has to be done (may be subject of a
Judicial Review/ Ombudsman complaint)
specialists in training for the planning service
©Trevor Roberts Associates
• the “expediency” decision must be soundly based on
your DEVELOPMENT PLAN and OTHER MATERIAL
CONSIDERATIONS
• this is the point where the Council is
exercising its DISCRETION
• effectively you are asking: Would the
development be given planning
permission, or must some form of
action be taken?
• similarly a condition should not be imposed on a grant of
planning permission unless it is necessary and there is a
sound reason based on the Development Plan or a
material consideration
specialists in training for the planning service
©Trevor Roberts Associates
BREACH OF CONDITION • if used properly, conditions can enhance the quality of
development, enable a permission to be granted which
might other wise have been refused
• the public have a reasonable
expectation that conditions will be
complied with, failure to comply
noticed and appropriate action taken
• the integrity of the whole planning process: making
plans and dealing with applications, and the public’s
confidence and expectation of the system therefore
depends on an authority's readiness to take EFFECTIVE
ENFORCEMENT ACTION when it is ESSENTIAL
specialists in training for the planning service
©Trevor Roberts Associates
BUT … • Are your decision notices well thought-out/laid-out, user-
friendly documents?
• Are your conditions enforceable?
- necessary
- relevant to planning
- relevant to the development
- precise
- reasonable*
• Are your reasons specific, explaining clearly and
succinctly why the condition is being attached? If not the
condition will be unenforceable
* “Tests” set out in Circular 10/95 developed from lots of case law
specialists in training for the planning service
©Trevor Roberts Associates
TYPES OF CONDITIONS AND
ORDERING ON DECSION NOTICES
- time by which development must commencement
(3 years a default position)
- pre-commencement conditions
- conditions applying to the
development phase, including
listing of the approved plans
- conditions applying in the post
development phase
- time limit on the permission (if appropriate)
- conditions which will continuously apply to the
development
specialists in training for the planning service
©Trevor Roberts Associates
BUT ... • Are your decision notices well thought-out/laid-out, user-
friendly documents?
• Are your conditions enforceable?
- necessary
- relevant to planning
- relevant to the development
- precise
- reasonable*
• Are your reasons specific, explaining clearly and
succinctly why the condition is being attached? If not the
condition will be unenforceable
* “Tests” set out in Circular 11/95 developed from lots of case law
specialists in training for the planning service
©Trevor Roberts Associates
ALLEGED BREACH OF CONDITION
“ . . prior to the garden centre . . . opening, details of the
proposed types of products to be
sold should be submitted to and
agreed in writing by the LPA”
Reason: to ensure the use remains
seasonal, specialist and leisure
orientated as required by policy . . .
- the condition does not restrict the goods that can be sold
- “should” rather than “shall” begs question whether
developer had to submit the details
TELFORD & WEAKIN v SSCLG [2013] EWHC 79 (Admin)
specialists in training for the planning service
©Trevor Roberts Associates
DRAFTING GOOD CONDITIONS
When you ask for an additional condition(s) to be imposed,
remember:
The applicant must know:
- What is precluded?
- What is required? When and How
- When the condition will take effect
The authority must be satisfied that:
- the condition can be monitor to detect any breach and
there are the resources to do so
- if there is a breach it has the resources and the “bottle” to
enforce
. . .OR THERE WILL BE NO COMPLIANCE CULTURE specialists in training for the planning service
©Trevor Roberts Associates specialists in training for the planning service
TIME LIMITS FOR ENFORCING
AGAINST CONDITIONS
• condition restricting change of use to
a dwellinghouse – FOUR YEARS from
the date of the breach
• other breaches of condition -TEN YEARS
from the date of the breach
NB: IF THERE IS A BREACH OF A TRUE PRE-CONDITION
(one which goes to the “heart” of the permission) then the
permission has not been started this is not a breach of
condition but development without planning permission
©Trevor Roberts Associates specialists in training for the planning service
10 YEAR LIMIT ON CONDITIONS
• if there has been a continuous breach of a “to do”
condition (e.g. paint a house, erect a fence) after 10years
the breach becomes lawful; nothing can be done
• BUT if a condition has a continuing requirement (e.g. hours
of opening, agricultural occupancy) even after 10years if
there is a material period of compliance (i.e. “hours”
complied with/property unoccupied) any subsequent
breach is a new breach and time runs again
• an assessment is a matter of fact and degree in every case
- Court has held that an Inspector’s view that 48 days was
not a “temporary stopping and starting of the breach” of
an occupancy condition considered well founded
©Trevor Roberts Associates specialists in training for the planning service
ENFORCEMENT IS TOO LATE
AND TOO SLOW!
• the Planning Act (in England) does not require
the developer to tell the LPA when he intends
to start so that monitoring compliance with
conditions can be triggered (mandatory in
Scotland)
• the introduction of CIL - the Community
Infrastructure Levy will help; notification of
commencement is mandatory and will trigger the start
of payments
• investigations need to gather evidence, this can
sometimes be time-consuming
©Trevor Roberts Associates specialists in training for the planning service
• often necessary to serve statutory notices e.g. PLANNING
CONTRAVENTION NOTICE and give time for their return,
in order to get information and details of interests in the
land so that any enforcement notice is
served correctly
• the “alleged” contravener has to be
given time to put things right
• the “reporter/complainant” has to be
kept informed throughout
• Enforcement notices carry a right of appeal
REMEMBER: getting things wrong at this stage can be
damaging and potentially (very) costly later
©Trevor Roberts Associates
ENFORCEMENT “TOOLS” APPLICATION TO VARY OR REMOVE THE CONDITION -this may satisfactorily resolve the problem
BREACH OF CONDITION NOTICE - requires full compliance, no appeal (but could face a legal challenge), non-compliance a criminal offence, must be prosecuted in the Magistrates Court, limited fine, no power for LPA to do the work
BREACH OF CONDITION ENFORCEMENT NOTICE - limited right of appeal, under-enforcement option, prosecution for non-compliance, Direct Action
BREACH OF CONDITION ENFORCEMENT NOTICE + STOP NOTICE - only appropriate for limited types of conditions
specialists in training for the planning service
©Trevor Roberts Associates specialists in training for the planning service
BCN v ENFORCEMENT NOTICE
Trust your officers their decision will be
based on:
• type of condition
• how well the condition meets “the
tests” in Circular 10/95
• what you want to achieve
• whether under-enforcing will deal
with the planning harm (as now perceived)
• who would be better assessing the requirements of
the condition - Magistrates or an Inspector?
• whether prosecution/fine/criminal record will matter to
the Defendant
©Trevor Roberts Associates specialists in training for the planning service
TWO QUESTIONS TO LEAVE YOU WITH ...
Q. Is “reacting” to complaints when things have gone
wrong the best use of scarce resources?
Q. What message is this approach sending to the
community about the integrity of your planning process?
©Trevor Roberts Associates
WHOEVER SAID BEING A COUNCILLOR WOULD
BE EASY?
YOU WILL HAVE DIFFICULT DECISIONS TO MAKE
IN THE COMING MONTHS
Presentation by:
VIVIEN GREEN
specialists in training for the planning service
WELL... IT’S UP TO YOU IF YOU
WANT TO INSTIL A
“COMPLIANCE CULTURE”
IN YOUR COMMUNITY
Vivien Green Senior Associate TRA