7
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURING CORE INDICATORS PERSPECTIVE 2007-2013 Stanisław Bienias National Evaluation Unit Polish Ministry of Regional Development

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURING CORE INDICATORS PERSPECTIVE 2007-2013 Stanisław Bienias National Evaluation Unit Polish Ministry of Regional

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURING CORE INDICATORS PERSPECTIVE 2007-2013 Stanisław Bienias National Evaluation Unit Polish Ministry of Regional

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

MEASURING CORE INDICATORSPERSPECTIVE 2007-2013

Stanisław Bienias

National Evaluation UnitPolish Ministry of Regional Development

Page 2: MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURING CORE INDICATORS PERSPECTIVE 2007-2013 Stanisław Bienias National Evaluation Unit Polish Ministry of Regional

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Measuring Core IndicatorsPerspective 2004-2006

Perspective 2004-2006 and its problems:

-No core indicators

-Huge amount of indicators

-No integrated monitoring IT system

-Indicators were uncomparable and disagregable at the NDP level

Page 3: MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURING CORE INDICATORS PERSPECTIVE 2007-2013 Stanisław Bienias National Evaluation Unit Polish Ministry of Regional

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Measuring Core IndicatorsPerspective 2007-2013

Perspective 2007-2013:

- Great progress in programming indicators

-List of polish key indicators – common for all OPs, based on categories of intervention

-beneficiaries are obliged to submit these indicators in their reports

-EC core indicators included in this system

-Country IT System (SIMIK’s successor)… but still not satisfactory…

Page 4: MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURING CORE INDICATORS PERSPECTIVE 2007-2013 Stanisław Bienias National Evaluation Unit Polish Ministry of Regional

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Measuring Core IndicatorsEmerging problems:

Perspective 2007-2013:

Emerging difficulties

-Most of the indicators at the NSRF level are impact context indicators, but include separate part concerning impact of structural funds

-Important task for evaluation to estimate this impact

-Problems with definitions of indicators proposed by EC:e.g: value for timesavings in €

Additional population served with improved urban transport

Number of people benefiting from forest fire protection and other protection measures

Number of benefiting students

Page 5: MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURING CORE INDICATORS PERSPECTIVE 2007-2013 Stanisław Bienias National Evaluation Unit Polish Ministry of Regional

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Measuring Core IndicatorsPlans for the future

Informal group was established in Ministry of Regional Development, that works on the definitions of doubtful indicators

A few expertises are planned to be conducted on the verification of indicators system

- one of the products will be handbook of indicator definitions

Page 6: MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURING CORE INDICATORS PERSPECTIVE 2007-2013 Stanisław Bienias National Evaluation Unit Polish Ministry of Regional

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Measuring Core IndicatorsDifficulty?

It would be much easier for the Poland, if Commission presented definitions of indicators, that are closest to the Commission’s approach.

Page 7: MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MEASURING CORE INDICATORS PERSPECTIVE 2007-2013 Stanisław Bienias National Evaluation Unit Polish Ministry of Regional

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

P O L A N D

Ministry of Regional DevelopmentMinistry of Regional Developmentul. Wspólna 2/4ul. Wspólna 2/4www.mrr.gov.plwww.mrr.gov.pl

Thank you Thank you for for your attentionyour attention

e-mail: e-mail: [email protected]@mrr.gov.pl