Upload
lamdien
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
MGNREGS UPDATE News for Internal Circulation No. 16 / April 1, 2015 –April 15, 2015 Foundation for Ecological Security
Rain-hit areas to get NREGS boost
3 April, 2015 9:01 PM
NITI Aayog vice-chairman Arvind Panagariya says
farmers can’t be fully compensated for crop damage.
The Union government will increase the number of
work days under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural
Employment Guarantee Scheme from 100 to 150 in
places where the recent unseasonal rain and hailstorms
have affected crops. The relief package will include
cash compensation.
In addition, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has sought
recommendations from NITI Aayog on how insurance
can be used to protect farmers from losses arising out
of crop damage, Arvind Panagariya, vice-chairman of
the organisation, said.
“The Finance Ministry and the Agriculture Ministry
are readying a relief package that will include cash
compensation for damaged crops to farmers hit by the
unseasonal rain and hailstorms,” Dr. Panagariya told
The Hindu. “It will not be possible for the Finance
Ministry to provide funds to fully compensate farmers,
but some cash relief will be provided.”
Union Food Minister Ram Vilas Paswan has proposed
enhanced wheat allocations to the affected families
under the public distribution system. An inter-
ministerial group, headed by Union Home Minister
Rajnath Singh, deliberating upon relief for farmers has,
however, rejected the proposal. Agriculture Minister
Radha Mohan Singh and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley
are the members of the group.
A source in the inter-ministerial group said the cash
compensation would be paid out from the State
Disaster Relief Fund (SDRF) and the National Disaster
Relief Fund (NDRF). “Both also allow for food
compensation in case of crop damage … That option is
Inside
News
• More evidence: NREGA generated jobs for poor SCs & STs
• Speed up MGNREGA works: PR Commissioner • Now, Aadhaar card must for MGNREGA
applicants • NREGS' essence is its problem now • MNREGA wages hiked by Rs. 13 a day • NREGA and after: Large-scale migration of
rural masses is back in Chhattisgarh • NREGA: Each household got only 39 job days
last year • Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike
at all • Heat hits MNREGS workers in North Coastal
Andhra
Government Order
• MGNREGA – delays in payment of wages – certain initiatives proposed.
• Clarification regarding – Implementation of capturing the Aadhaar / EID number at the time of demand registration in DBT notified districts.
• Guidelines for securing full employment status to MGNREGA workers through Project for Livelihoods in Full Employment (Project LIFE-MGNREGA).
• National Resource Group for MGNREGA (NRGM) in Centre for Wage Employment and Poverty Alleviation (CWEPA) of NIRD-PR.
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
also available,” the source said. The Centre allocates
more funds to the States in case the expenditure is
more than the money available in the SDRF.
https://in.newshub.org/rain-hit-areas-get-nregs-boost-
14849685.html
More evidence: NREGA generated jobs for poor
SCs & STs
Amidst brouhaha over the importance of MGNREGA,
the recently released 68th Round National Sample
Survey (NSS) report clears the air whether the
MGNREGA had been beneficial to employment of
persons from Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled
Tribes (STs) and Other Backward Classes (OBCs).
Based on a survey of nearly 59,700 households in rural
areas of India, the NSS 68th Round data shows that the
proportion of persons who got job in MGNREGA
work was the highest among SCs (55.6%), followed by
STs (50.5%), OBCs (49.1%) and was the lowest
among 'others' category (45.5%). At the national level,
this proportion (for all castes taken together) was
50.5%.
The 68th Round of NSS, which was conducted during
July 2011 to June 2012 indicates that the proportion of
persons (18 years & above and registered in the
scheme) who sought but did not get work in
MGNREG work was the highest for 'others' category
of persons (21.9%) and it was the lowest among OBCs
(16.5%). At the all India level, this proportion (for all
castes taken together) was 18.8%.
The proportion of females who sought but did not get
work in MGNREGA was 16.8% whereas for males the
same was 20.2%.
Among the STs, the proportion of males getting
MGNREGA work was 51.8% whereas the same for
females was 48.9%. Among the SCs, the proportion of
males getting MGNREGA work was 55.1% whereas
the same for females was 56.3%.
The proportion of ST households having MGNREGA
job card was 7.3% in Bihar, 73.6% in Chhattisgarh,
38.1% in Jharkhand, 76.9% in Madhya Pradesh, 55.1%
in Odisha, 82.3% in Rajasthan and 31.3% in Uttar
Pradesh.
The proportion of SC households having MGNREGA
job card was 35.8% in Bihar, 75.6% in Chhattisgarh,
44% in Jharkhand, 73% in Madhya Pradesh, 48.1% in
Odisha, 80.6% in Rajasthan and 43.4% in Uttar
Pradesh.
The proportion of ST persons (18 years & above and
registered in the scheme) who sought but did not get
employment in MGNREGA was 37.5% in Bihar, 8.9%
in Chhattisgarh, 16.4% in Jharkhand, 13.2% in
Madhya Pradesh, 23.7% in Odisha, 22.1% in
Rajasthan and 19.8% in Uttar Pradesh.
The proportion of SC persons (18 years & above and
registered in the scheme) who sought but did not get
employment in MGNREGA was 33.8% in Bihar,
13.4% in Chhattisgarh, 37.8% in Jharkhand, 21.3% in
Madhya Pradesh, 25.6% in Odisha, 22.8% in
Rajasthan and 15.2% in Uttar Pradesh.
It is worth noting that at the national level, the
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
proportion of unemployed (i.e. number of persons
unemployed per 100 persons) as per usual status (usual
principal status+subsidiary status) among rural male
was nearly 0.7% for ST, while for each of SC, OBC
and others category, it was nearly 1% and for females,
proportion of unemployed was observed to vary
between 0.4% to 0.5% for various social groups. The
unemployment rate (i.e. number of persons
unemployed per 100 persons in the labour force)
among rural male was 2% for SC, 1.7% for OBC,
1.8% for 'others' and among ST it was 1.3%. Among
females, unemployment rate was 2.4% among others
category, 1.7% among OBC, 1.4% among SC and
1.1% among ST.
The key findings of the NSS report no. 563:
Employment and Unemployment Situation among
Social Groups in India (released in January 2015)
pertaining to the participation of rural households in
MGNREGA works are as follows
(i) Households with MGNREG job cards and
registration of persons in MGNREG job cards
* About 38.4% of the households in rural areas had
MGNREGA job cards.
* A higher proportion of households belonging to ST
or SC category had MGNREGA job cards than OBC
or others category of households: 57.2% of ST
households and 50% of SC households had MGNREG
job cards as compared to 34.2% of OBC households
and 27.1% of others category of households.
* About 23.7% of the rural persons of age 18 years and
above were registered in MGNREG job card.
* Among persons of age 18 years and above, a higher
proportion of males compared to females were
registered in MGNREGA job card: nearly 28.1% of
males compared to 19.4% of females were registered
in MGNREGA job card.
* The proportion of persons of age 18 years and above
registered in MGNREGA job cards was the highest,
nearly 42.6% for persons belonging to ST households,
followed by 30.9% for SC, 21% for OBC and the
lowest 14.7% for persons in others category of
households.
(ii) Status of getting work in MGNREG work among
persons of age 18 years and above registered in
MGNREG job cards
* Among rural persons of age 18 years and above
registered in MGNREG job cards, 50.5% got work in
MGNREGA work, 18.8% sought but did not get
MGNREG works and 30.5% did not seek work in
MGNERG work.
* Proportion of persons who got work in MGNREGA
work was the highest among SC (55.6%), followed by
ST (50.5%), OBC (49.1%) and was the lowest among
others category (45.5%).
* The proportion of persons who sought but did not get
work in MGNREGA work was the highest for others
category of persons (21.9%) and it was the lowest
among OBC (16.5%).
* The proportion of persons who did not seek
work in MGNERG work was the highest among
OBC (nearly 34.2%) and was the lowest among SC
(24%), while it was 30.4% among ST and 32.5%
among others category.
http://www.im4change.org/news-alerts/more-evidence-nrega-
generated-jobs-for-poor-scs-sts-4675835.html
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
Speed up MGNREGA works: PR Commissioner
Panchayat Raj Commissioner B. Ramanjaneyulu
addressing officials at Chittoor on Saturday. Chittoor
DWMA Project Director S. Rajasekhar Naidu (left)
and ZP CEO Venugopal Reddy are seen. —Photo: K.
Umashanker
State Panchayat Raj and Rural Development
Commissioner B. Ramanjaneyulu on Saturday
expressed anguish at the irregularities in implementing
the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment
Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA) in the State, and
warned the officials at the three-tiers — village,
mandal and district — to keep pace with targets set for
the year 2015-16.
Addressing officials of his department at ZP Meeting
Hall here, Mr. Ramanjaneyulu observed that the
general fallacy on NREGA is that it was being viewed
as ‘something to do with menial jobs meant for the
poorest of the poor.’ He sought the officials at the field
level to dispel this notion among the general public
and make their participation a meaningful exercise for
strengthening the rural infrastructure and economy as
well.
“There is nothing wrong or shameful in taking the
utensils meant for de-silting tanks. All those who have
no work or are lazy should think of making themselves
partners in this scheme for a better future of the State,”
the official said. He warned the officials that from the
year 2015-16, the wages for the field staff would be
based on their performance.
Of 1.15 crore job cards issued in the State, only 42
lakh persons are coming for works, and not even 50%
among them are really showing seriousness in
attending to works
B. Ramanjaneyulu, Panchayat Raj and Rural
Development Commissioner
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/speed-up-
mgnrega-works-pr-commissioner-tells-officials/article7069405.ece
Now, Aadhaar card must for MGNREGA
applicants
Bagish Jha, TNN | Apr 12, 2015, 08.01PM IST
INDORE: After LPG subsidy, Union government has
made Aadhaar card mandatory for job applicants under
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment
Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). The move, however, is
being criticized by activists.
"MGNREGA Management Information System (MIS)
is refusing to accept work demand or generate musters
for workers unless Aadhaar number is mentioned,"
said Madhuri from Jagrit Adivasi Dalit Sangathan.
Terming it latest effort of government to derail
MGNREGA, Madhuri said this is contempt of SC
order, according to which Aadhaar card is not
mandatory. "Probationary officers (block CEOs),
panchayat secretaries and rozgar sahayaks have been
asking beneficiaries for Aadhaar card, without which,
they will not be given work."
Harsingh Jamra, a tribal from Barwani, said many still
do not have Aadhar card. There are hundreds of
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
families in rural areas, which are depending on
MGNREGA for their livelihood. "Instead of
simplifying the process, government is making it more
complicated for beneficiaries," he said.
Madhuri alleged that since September 2014, no new
work under the job scheme has started. "State
government has given instructions to district collector
not to start new work," alleged Madhuri, adding that
Barwani collector has been writing to commissioner
MGNREGA, requesting permission to start new work.
District administration has been instructed to send
workers to sites, where work is underway.
About 1,500 workers from Barwani, have filed for
unemployment allowance and more are expected to
follow in coming days. "We have written a letter to
state government highlighting difficulties of farmers
and we will also organize a rally against the
government order," added Madhuri.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/indore/Now-Aadhaar-card-
must-for-MGNREGA-applicants/articleshow/46898221.cms
NREGS' essence is its problem now
TNN | Apr 3, 2015, 06.37AM IST
NEW DELHI: Guarantee' and 'employment' - the very
two words that brought sheen to NREGS for many
years - have become the biggest challenge to one of
the most ambitious pro-poor schemes in the world,
making it jaded, unreliable and almost futile in many
places.
Even as UPA's pet scheme enters the 10th year, and
with finance minister Arun Jaitley making it clear in
the Budget that the NDA regime will nurse the
scheme, ground reports from across the country show
NREGS is facing a plethora of problems. Primary
among these is a sharp cut in central funds to most
states, which in turn has led to a steep fall in the
number of projects, migration of workers due to
pending wage bills and families being deprived of the
mandatory 100 mandays every year.
The central fund allocation is slashed by up to 45% in
some states. Some states are yet to receive the final
instalment of this truncated allocation, forcing them to
hold back wage bills. West Bengal panchayat minister
Subrata Mukherjee said he has been repeatedly urging
the Centre to clear Rs 1,000-crore NREGS dues to his
state. "This is plaguing the work already undertaken,"
he said.
Nepal Singha, sabhapati of Salboni panchayat samiti in
Bengal's West Midnapore, said that 10 gram
panchayats under his samiti owed Rs 2.46 crore to
15,000 workers. "The delay in payment is triggering
dissent among workers. They are refusing to take up
fresh projects unless their dues are cleared. This has
severely affected works like building roads, ponds and
dams and making arid land cultivable," he said. Singha
is not alone. Hundreds of samitis across the country
face the same problem.
Late payments and slashed budget have derailed many
projects in Tamil Nadu, which has been rated as the
best performing state. "Villagers are not ready to work
because of delayed wages. If the delay continues, there
will be a problem getting workers under NREGS," said
an official, adding there was a shortfall of Rs 1,700
crore in the last quarter of 2014-15.
Sources in the Karnataka government pointed out that
the peak working season for NREGS schemes starts
from NovemberDecember. "Lack of funds will have a
debilitating impact on these schemes as we can't keep
up the momentum and meet the needs of the wage
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
seekers," the sources said, adding the Centre was yet to
clear Rs 141.5 crore wage bills.
Assam CM Tarun Gogoi also echoed the views that the
cut in funds came at a time when NREGS were
making substantial progress.
The diminishing central funds have disappointed BJP-
ruled states like Maharashtra as well.The state had
raised a demand of Rs 1,551 crore for this financial
year. "We were expecting Rs 1,100 crore but got Rs
800 crore," said Maharashtra NREGS commissioner
Muthukrishnan Sankarnarayan, adding that the state
government would raise the remaining Rs 300 crore. R
Ramakumar, an economist with Tata Institute of Social
Sciences, Mumbai, said this was bad news for the
"drought-prone state where such employment schemes
are paramount for sustaining the livelihoods of rural
households".He added that Maharashtra was among
the worst states in implementing NREGS. Only 4% of
the households in the state have received employment
under NREGS, against 25% in India and 62% in
Rajasthan, said Ramakumar.
But Rajasthan, a 'poster boy for NREGS', is also
slipping. The labour budget in 2014-15 has come down
to Rs 2071 crores from Rs 2334 crores in 2013-14.
This has reduced the mandays to 1,471 lakhs from
1,878 lakhs in 2013-14.
Till last year, the 100 mandayquota of each family
used to be exhausted by February in most parts of the
state. In 2014-15, some families did not even log 40
mandays. "I am from a community that used to beg for
food, till NREGS changed my life. But there's no work
available this time. We can't sit at home. I would be
forced to go back to begging if this continues," said
Ganga Devi from a village in Ajmer district.
NREGS's past success in states like Rajasthan and TN
can be gauged by assets created at the village level.For
instance, people of Arjungarh village in Rajasthan's
Rajsamand district swear by the check dam built under
NREGS in the initial years. "The dam raised the water
level of our wells. Earlier, our wells would go dry by
now. But despite poor rains in 2014, the wells still
have water," says Sevaram.
But politically, the importance of NREGS has come
down with a change of governments at both state and
central level. A few months ago, CM Vasundhara Raje
sug g ested that NREGS be changed from an Act to a
scheme, evoking protests. "People have mobilized in
large numbers against the CM's suggestion," said
Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) leader
Nikhil Dey.
Strang ely, in BJP-ruled Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh,
state officials blamed polls for poor implementation of
NREGS projects in last one year.
Chhattisgarh, ironically, had a problem of plenty
before the polls.Sources said that as the state headed
for the November 2013 polls, its rural development
department sanctioned and executed massive NREGS
works to benefit the rural masses. Labour and material
payments were kept pending, in anticipation that funds
would be allocated in the 2014-15 fiscal, and the
works were implemented in all the 27 districts without
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
proper monitoring, the sources said. With BJP
retaining power, this trend continued till the LS polls.
But with NDA government slashing funds after
coming to power at the Centre, NREGS works have
almost come to a grinding halt across the state. A top
rural development department official admitted that
large-scale irregularities were recently unearthed and
cases registered against officials. In many states, the
number of works sanctioned under the scheme have
gone down, as have the beneficiaries. MP has seen a
sharp decline from 4,74,608 works in 2013-14 to
1,76,610 this fiscal. The reach of the scheme has been
reduced to 50% in states like Bihar.
(With inputs from Saibal Sen in Kolkata, Vithika
Salomi in Patna, Prabin Kalita in Guwahati, Priyanka
Kakodkar in Mumbai, Naheed Ataulla in Bangalore,
Deshdeep Saxena in Bhopal, Jaideep Deogharia in
Ranchi, Joseph John in Raipur, Anindo Dey in Jaipur,
Ramu Bhagwat in Nagpur and B Sivakumnar in
Chennai)
http://in.b2.mk/news/?newsid=NYv
MNREGA wages hiked by Rs. 13 a day
Attend Labour Law 2015 - Labour & Social Security
talks Register for ISLSSL Congress
Nagesh Prabhu
There’s some good news for beneficiaries of the
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment
Guarantee Act (MNREGA), as the wage rate per day
has been revised with effect from April 1.
Daily wages have gone up from Rs. 191 in 2014–15 to
Rs. 204 in 2015–16, an increase by Rs. 13 a day.
However, the expenditure incurred per person per day
is Rs. 360.4, which includes equipment cost (Rs. 136)
and administration cost (Rs. 20.4).
With this, the wage rates have been revised nine times
since the launch of the job scheme in 2006–07 by the
previous UPA government. The revision in the wage
rate indexed to the Consumer Price Index for
Agricultural Labour. The State government spent just
51 per cent of the allocated funds during 2014–15 [Rs.
1,683.65 crore as against Rs. 3,151.76 crore]. The
State is expected to get Rs. 2,587.35 crore during
2015–16 for taking up various works under the
scheme. In the current fiscal year, the State will spend
more than 60 per cent of the allocated amount in the
most backward 69 taluks. More funds will be spent on
labour budget in these taluks. The labour budget has
been depressed due to poor capacity. It was proposed
to generate 4.56 crore man-days work in the most
backward taluks and 2.61 crore man-days work in rest
of the taluks in the State in the current financial year.
The Centre has directed the State to identify gram
panchayats for the ‘open defecation free’ campaign
under the scheme as a part of the Swachh Bharat
Abhiyan. The planning and identification of works
should be started before August to ensure completion
by March 2016. The Centre said in 11 districts, the
expenditure on agriculture-related works is below the
statutory limit and efforts should be made to spend
more money on farm works.
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/mgnrega-wages-
hiked-by-rs-13-a-day/article7083051.ece
NREGA and after: Large-scale migration of rural
masses is back in Chhattisgarh
by Parivesh Mishra Apr 2, 2015 15:06 IST
Raipur - After a lull of nearly seven years, large-scale
migration of rural masses in search of livelihood is
back in news in Chhattisgarh again.
While the state government has informed the assembly
that nearly one lakh people have left their homes and
migrated in search of job in the state in the last three
years, conservative non-official estimates put the
figure at more than 20 lakhs.
The period of lull coincides with the period the
previous UPA government pushed its rural safety net
programme, MNREGA, with much enthusiasm; the
change has come with the Raman Singh government
going slow on it in the state after the Centre reduced
allocation to the state government. The rural economy,
which witnessed a period of calm - some would call it
artificial calm - is back in the turbulent mode.
Reuters
“The ground situation is far more worrisome than the
figures of the migration suggest,” says T Singh Deo,
the leader of the opposition in the state assembly.
“People migrate either in search of better wage or
when there is no wage. This year the change in the
central government's policy drastically cut down the
income of the farmers by first refusing to buy paddy
and then by withholding distribution of the promised
bonus. The spending power of the farmers shrunk. To
add to the misery of the rural people, the state
government faltered on starting the employment
generating programmes under MGNREGA.
Combined, these two factors have rendered a
devastating blow to the rural economy leaving lakhs of
landless as well as the small and marginal farmers with
no option but to migrate in search of jobs and wages,”
believes Singh Deo.
The government bases its figures essentially on the
number of permits for migration it issues under the
interstate migrant workmen act. 1979. The bulk of the
migration takes place without the official license.
Besides, it overlooks the migration within the state
or even districts. Even these figures tell a story.
According to the official figures of the state, in
Bilaspur district 17796 people migrated in 2006 – the
year MGNREGA was introduced. The figure kept
coming down steadily and in 2010, it was only 1,223.
No figures are available for the later years.
Chhattisgarh was first recognised nationally as a
supplier of cheap labour towards the end of the 19th
century when, immediately after the completion of the
Eastern segment of the Howrah-Bombay rail link,
thousands of labour from the famine struck plains were
carted to the tea gardens of Assam.
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
The trend became a habit and then a forced way of life
in over hundred years thereafter, until MGNREGA -
the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment
Guarantee Act - which the World Bank termed a
"stellar example of rural development" in its World
Development Report 2014 - arrived in the middle of
the last decade. It was the first constitutionally
supported measure to help the land-less poor and small
farmers to get work in their village at reasonable
wages.
The scheme brought migration down drastically. More
importantly it provided an upward pressure on the
baseline wages and thereby gave a boost to the
bargaining capacity of the poor. With the drastic shift
of the rural labour from the agricultural to the
MGNREGA-backed infrastructure and other non-farm
sector, the land holding class in the villages panicked
in its reactions in the initial years.
The policies of the state government, preparing to go
to the assembly elections first in 2008 and then in
2013, helped in no small measure in bringing the rural
economy to its present status.
Keen to please both the segments of the rural society at
the same time, it first distributed ration cards to all and
sundry and made them eligible to buy rice at virtually
no price. This decreased their appetite for work. The
absence of hands from the field brought the wages at
par with the MGNREGA.
The farmers or the land holders were pampered with
the ‘unlimited’ amount of paddy that they were
allowed to sell to the government at the minimum
support price. This turned tractor owner farmers into
smugglers of paddy that was available in the
neighbouring states at a cheaper price and to sell it to
the government and lay claims on the bonus.
Flush with surplus money, the landowners lost no time
in going shopping for the farm equipment like,
tractors, trolleys, harvesters and thrashers.
The vacuum created by the departure of the manual
help in the agriculture sector was filled up by the
machines, plugging to a large extent the window of
opportunity for the rural labour to return to the farms.
With the change of the government in Delhi after the
2014 Lok Sabha elections, the scenario took another
‘U’ turn. The rural economy turned upside down yet
again, this time for the worse. The uglier contours of
the changed face are coming to the fore now.
First, the Centre tightened its purse strings and the
state government, in spite of a much-trumpeted
promise in its election manifesto to the contrary,
refused to buy paddy from the farmers beyond a rather
token quantity. The list of eligible farmers to sell
paddy was drastically pruned. No bonus was given.
This gave a deadly blow to the income and purchasing
power of the farmer. Neeraj Patel of Botalda near
Raigarh is the leading dealer of established brands of
farm equipment in Chhattisgarh. He says after the
graph of sale going up and up in the past couple of
years, it has nose-dived this year. The worse is, he
continues, that the farmers are not in a position to
repay the loans on the equipments bought earlier.
The labours and the marginal and small farmers were
hit harder.
The Modi government immediately after taking over
betrayed intentions of giving a re-look to the
MGNREGA programmes. The speculated changes
were drastic pruning of the area of coverage; cutting
down the wage component of the programme;
curtailing the central government’s share of funds etc.
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
Whatever the stated intentions of the government
were, the indifference had a crippling effect on the
state’s rural economy as it spread uncertainty about the
scheme.
The road map of the work that the government plans to
take up in the non-farming months under the scheme
used to go public towards the end of the kharif season.
It didn’t happen this year. The labour after a wait of
few work-less weeks was forced to look for other
avenues. The option of going back to the agriculture
sector had almost lapsed with the arrival of the
machines and the diminished spending power of the
farmers. The fact that in many areas of the state, the
dues of the last years’ work were not cleared, added to
the urgency to look for options.
The migration was triggered as a natural corollary.
According to the government's admission in the
assembly, the migration has taken place from virtually
every part of the state. The maximum number of
people migrated from the Champa-Janjgir district.
The state government has inked MoU with 34
companies with plans to set up as many power plants
in this district alone. The proposed power plants with a
total capacity of about 34,000 MW will require about
40,000 acre of land, most of which was irrigated
agricultural fields till the acquisitions started.
“A total of around 10,000 acres is the requirement of
the industry in one Dabhra block alone of this district,”
says Murlidhar Chandram of ‘Srijan Kendra’ a Dabhra
based NGO active in the agricultural sector. In
Chhattisgarh, 82.56 percent population lives in 20,376
villages. About 80 percent population of the state has
traditionally depended on agro economy. The Champa-
Janjgir district is no exception. The state has entered
what portends to be the worst slow down in the recent
years.
http://www.firstpost.com/business/nrega-and-after-large-scale-
migration-of-rural-masses-is-back-in-chhattisgarh-2183681.html
NREGA: Each household got only 39 job days
last year
It was the NDA government which implemented
MGNREGA unlike in the previous years when it was
monitored by Congress-led governments.
Written by Ruhi Tewari | New Delhi | Published
on:April 6, 2015 12:57 am
The gaps in the implementation of Mahatma Gandhi
National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
(MGNREGA) continue to widen despite the scheme
being in its tenth year. The last year (2014-15) has
turned out to be worst year of the scheme since its
inception in terms of the average number of days of
employment provided to each household.
The MGNREGA, introduced in February 2006 by the
UPA government, promises 100 days of employment
every year to each rural household. However, last year,
it was the NDA government which implemented the
scheme unlike in the previous years when it was
monitored by Congress-led governments.
As per the data available with the Ministry of Rural
Development, which implements the scheme, the
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
average days of employment provided per household
in 2014-15 were only 39.2, significantly lower than in
2013-14 when the figure was 46. Last year was the
scheme’s worst performance on this count in the past
nine years since it was introduced. The average days of
employment provided per household has, although
always low, remained above the 40-mark. The figure
was 43, 42, 48, 54, 47, 43, 46 in 2006-07, 2007-08,
2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13
respectively.
While ministry officials claim that the data usually
come in with a lag and the figure for last year could
subsequently improve, they also say the scheme’s poor
performance in 2014-15 was largely a supply side
problem. Fund constraints and delayed release of funds
to states meant no proper planning could be done at the
local level, leading to a paucity of work.
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/nrega-each-
household-got-only-39-job-days-last-year/
Rs 2 to Rs 17: Rise in NREGS wages is no hike at
all
Subodh Ghildiyal, TNN | Apr 7, 2015, 02.13AM IST
Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the
wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from
a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a
day’s labour.
NEW DELHI: It is a wage hike that is no-hike at all.
Discharging its annual duty, the Centre has revised the
wages under the job guarantee scheme that range from
a minimum of Rs two to a maximum of Rs 17 for a
day's labour. In percentage terms, the hike ranges
between 2%-10%.
Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh stand at the bottom
of the ladder with the hike under MGNREGA being a
meagre Rs 2, increased from Rs 157 in 2014 to Rs 159
in 2015. Election-bound Bihar and Jharkhand have
been given a hike of Rs four, from Rs 158 to 162.
In contrast, Kerala is on top with a wage increase of Rs
17, followed by Tamil Nadu of Rs 16 and Haryana is
Rs 15.
The revision remains gloomy across the states. Assam
has registered a hike of Rs 12, Andhra and Gujarat Rs
11, while Odisha, Rajasthan and Punjab have a jump
of Rs 10 over the last year's figure.
If the increase in wages appears ludicrous, experts say
the blame rests not on government but on the
"Consumer Price Index (CPI)-agriculture labour" with
which the MGNREGA wages are linked to. The
Centre, through the rural development ministry, is
bound to order a revision based on increase in farm
labour in a particular state during the year.
The job scheme promises 100 days' employment to
each interested rural household, with the work mostly
consisting of hard labour.
The wage revision this year does not even appear to
cover the increase in price of vegetables like onion or
commodities of daily use. Many fault the methodology
for effecting the hike. Experts say there could be more
than CPI-AL to hitch the job wages to.
The controversy is not new. Sources said the issue had
erupted three years ago when the gain made by some
backward states was as low as Re one. While the states
had complained, they could not carp about much
because CPI-agriculture labour is worked out by states,
though for labour bureau under the Central
government.
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
As per the wage revision, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand
and West Bengal have registered an increase of Rs 5,
Tripura of Rs 12, Maharashtra Rs 13, Karnataka Rs 13.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Rs-2-to-Rs-17-Rise-in-
NREGS-wages-is-no-hike-at-all/articleshow/46830788.cms
Heat hits MNREGS workers in North Coastal
Andhra
V Kamalakara Rao, TNN | Apr 7, 2015, 10.10AM IST
Three MNREGS workers have already died so far,
while more than 200 workers have fallen sick this
summer since March 1.
VISAKHAPATNAM: This summer is proving to be
crueler than usual for the beneficiaries of the Mahatma
Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee
Scheme (MGNREGS) in the three north coastal
districts of Srikakulam, Vizianagaram and
Visakhapatnam, especially since the region has been
stripped of its green cover by Cyclone Hudhud.
Three MNREGS workers have already died so far,
while more than 200 workers have fallen sick this
summer since March 1. While 40-year-old Suvada
Paparao of Pandalapaka village of Anandapuram
mandal in Visakhapatnam district died few days ago,
the two other deaths were reported from Vizianagaram
district. Most of the sick workers were women and the
old.
Meteorologists have already predicted a rise in
temperature levels in the district. N Narasimha Rao,
assistant meteorologist, India Meteorological
Department (IMD), Hyderabad Centre, said,
"Temperatures will constantly rise from April. If the
northwesterly winds blow, severe heat conditions will
prevail. However, over the past one week, southerly
winds were blowing in the north coastal belt
preventing the mercury from climbing, but this spell
will not last long."
Keeping in view the deaths and rising number of sick
cases amid predictions of a scorching summer ahead
due to the loss of green cover in the wake of Cyclone
Hudhud, which hit Vizag on October 12, the District
Water Management Agency (DWMA), which takes
care of NREGS, has rescheduled the work timings
from 7 am to 11 am this summer instead of 8 am to 12
noon last year. Nearly 1 lakh tents have been erected at
the worksites in 115 mandals of the north coastal
region and officials have appealed to senior
beneficiaries, particularly those over 70 years, not to
work in the summer.
R Sriramulu Naidu, project director, DWMA,
Visakhapatnam, said nearly 2 lakh people were
currently attending to work this summer, out of the
total 6 lakh job card holders in the district. "A worker
died recently on the site due to the heat stroke, which
is why we have rescheduled the work timings this
year. As warmer weather conditions are prevailing due
to the cyclone effect, we have appealed to senior
beneficiaries not to come to work in the summer. We
Initiative towards Energizing MGNREGA. ……………
will provide them opportunities in the monsoon
season," he explained.
Sriramulu Naidu said Rs 50,000 will be paid as
compensation to the kin of the deceased NREGS
worker and that they are discussing the possibility of
providing a special insurance coverage to all
MNREGS with the help of the department of labour.
P Prasanthi, project director, DWMA, Vizianagaram
district, said the state government has this time
announced a summer allowance of 25% for each
worker over and above the regular wages of Rs 169
per head in March and April, 30% summer allowance
in May and 20% in June. This apart, Rs 10 will be
given to each worker to purchase drinking water.
Commenting on the two deaths in Vizianagaram
district, she said that though deceased were NREGS
workers, they did not die at the worksite but while they
were on the way to the worksite.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/visakhapatnam/Heat-hits-
MNREGS-workers-in-North-Coastal-
Andhra/articleshow/46832848.cms