9
McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca

Recent Developments in Government Policies

Page 2: McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca

2

I. Yukon: Ross River Dena Council v. Yukon & Implications for Free Entry

¬ Yukon Court of Appeal (2012)¬ Duty to consult triggered as a result of both potential impact of

“Class 1 Activities” on asserted aboriginal rights and title and potential impact of mere recording of mineral tenure on asserted aboriginal title

¬ Reasoning is potentially problematic to right of free entry applicable in most Canadian jurisdictions

¬ Leave to appeal to SCC denied¬ Yukon currently in the process of revising its mining legislation to

reflect decision in Ross River¬ Influence of Ontario Mining Act amendments?

Page 3: McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca

3

II. Ontario: Mining Act Amendments

¬ Overview of Mining Act Amendments¬ Exploration plans and exploration permits¬ Consideration of “arrangements” between

aboriginal groups and proponent¬ Third party dispute resolution process

¬ Analysis in light of Ross River¬ Consultation on acquisition of tenure?

¬ MNDM consultation policy on early exploration

Page 4: McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca

4

III. Newfoundland and Labrador (NL):new Aboriginal Consultation Policy

¬ Published in April 2013

¬ General framework for decisions associated with land and resource decisions that may adversely affect asserted and established Aboriginal and treaty rights

¬ Proponents required to provide “reasonably necessary capacity-funding” and “any required financial accommodation”

¬ “...any consultation support or capacity required by a consulted party will be the responsibility of the proponent”

¬ “NL will not necessarily engage directly in Aboriginal consultation on proposed resources development” (p.5)

¬ Proponents are expected to fully confirm to NL’s “benefits-related expectations” and “enter into dialogue with Aboriginal organizations to address project-specific opportunities, with a goal of achieving a positive, sustainable, mutually beneficial outcome.” (p.7)

Page 5: McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca

5

III. Newfoundland and Labrador (NL):new Aboriginal Consultation Policy

¬ Places, in some instances, full burden of consultation on proponents – e.g. NL won’t directly engage in consultation with Aboriginal groups

¬ Mixes policy and law – e.g. benefits-related expectations¬ The only time “accommodation” is used is in respect of “economic

accommodation”¬ Appears to be an attempt by NL to download constitutional

obligations on to project proponents¬ Clear expectations of benefits agreements but no clear description

of expectations on proponents

Page 6: McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca

6

IV. Alberta: Aboriginal Consultation Levy Act & Aboriginal Consultation Plan

¬ Aboriginal Consultation Levy Act

¬ Bill 22 – Royal Assent May 27, 2013, not yet in force.

¬ Levy on industry proponents in order to assist First Nations with capacity funding for consultation

¬ Regulations will prescribe details/amounts of levy, form of payment and conditions of payment

¬ Ministry may require proponents to provide personal information, records and other documents, including confidential information and copies of agreements relating to consultation capacity and other benefits

Page 7: McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca

7

IV. Alberta: Aboriginal Consultation Levy Act & new Consultation Plan

¬ Policy on Consultation with First Nations on Land and Natural Resource Management, 2013¬ released August 16, 2013 ¬ will replace existing consultation policy once new Alberta

Aboriginal Consultation Office is established¬ Alberta Aboriginal Consultation Office will coordinate

consultation process¬ Outlines obligations of Crown, First Nations and Proponents

to participate ¬ Corporate Guidelines will supplement the new policy

Page 8: McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca

8

V. Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 & National Energy Board

¬ Notable changes to CEAA 2012 legislation¬ responsible authorities¬ designated projects¬ substitution/equivalency¬ timelines¬ public participation

¬ NEB process and National Energy Board Act

¬ New responsibilities for the NEB¬ Navigable waters

¬ Hearings, review panels

Page 9: McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca Recent Developments in Government Policies

McCarthy Tétrault LLP / mccarthy.ca

VANCOUVERSuite 1300, 777 Dunsmuir StreetP.O. Box 10424, Pacific CentreVancouver BC V7Y 1K2Tel: 604-643-7100 Fax: 604-643-7900 Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

CALGARYSuite 3300, 421 7th Avenue SWCalgary AB T2P 4K9Tel: 403-260-3500 Fax: 403-260-3501 Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

TORONTOBox 48, Suite 5300Toronto Dominion TowerToronto ON M5K 1E6Tel: 416-362-1812 Fax: 416-868-0673 Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

MONTRÉALSuite 25001000 De La Gauchetière Street WestMontréal QC H3B 0A2Tel: 514-397-4100 Fax: 514-875-6246 Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

QUÉBECLe Complexe St-Amable1150, rue de Claire-Fontaine, 7e étageQuébec QC G1R 5G4Tel: 418-521-3000 Fax: 418-521-3099 Toll-Free: 1-877-244-7711

UNITED KINGDOM & EUROPE125 Old Broad Street, 26th FloorLondon EC2N 1ARUNITED KINGDOMTel: +44 (0)20 7786 5700 Fax: +44 (0)20 7786 5702