Upload
jen-qianhui
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
1/28
A Generalized Logistic Function todescribe the Master Curve StiffnessProperties of Binder Mastics and Mixtures
Geoffrey M. Rowe, Abatech Inc.Gaylon Baumgardner, Paragon Technical Services
Mark J. Sharrock, Abatech International Ltd.
4545thth
Petersen Asphalt Research ConferencePetersen Asphalt Research ConferenceUniversity of WyomingUniversity of WyomingLaramie, Wyoming, July 14Laramie, Wyoming, July 14 --1616
Generalized logistic
/ 1log( )1(*)log( +++= e E
Richards curve
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
2/28
Master curve functionsObjectives
Review how robust mastercurve forms are fordifferent material typesMaterials
Polymers Asphalt binders Asphalt mixes
Hot Mix AsphaltMastics and filled systems
Observation different functional forms offer moreflexibility with complex materials
Need for evaluation
Work with various roofing materialsand materials used for dampingindicated that application of somestandard sigmoid functions would notdescribe functional form for materials
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
3/28
OverviewShifting
Free shifting Gordon and ShawFunctional form shifting
Master curve functional formsCA Sigmoid
MEPDGRichards etc
DiscussionRelevance to materials
Master curves A system of reduced variables to describethe effects of time and temperature on thecomponents of stiffness of visco-elasticmaterials
AlsoThermo-rheological simplicity
Time-temperature superpositionProduces composite plot called mastercurve
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
4/28
Simple master curveUse of EXCEL spreadsheet to manuallyshift to a reference temperature
Simple master curve
Isotherms
1.0E+03
1.0E+04
1.0E+05
1.0E+06
1.0E+07
1.0E+08
1.0E+09
1.0E- 02 1.0E- 01 1.0E+00 1. 0E+01 1.0E+02 1.0E+03 1. 0E+04
Freq. (Hz)
G * , P a
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 MC, Tref = 40 C
a(T)
Example asphaltbinder 15 PEN
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
5/28
Two parts curve and shiftsShift factor relationship ispart of master curvenumerical optimization
Master Curve
1.0E+03
1.0E+04
1.0E+05
1.0E+06
1.0E+07
1.0E+08
1.0E+09
1 .0 E- 02 1 .0 E- 01 1 .0 E+0 0 1. 0E+01 1 .0 E+02 1 .0E+03 1 .0E+0 4
Reduced Freq. (Hz), T ref = 40 C
G * , P a
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Shift factors
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Temperature, C
S h i f t f a c
t o r , a
( T )
Both curves can be fitted tofunctional forms to describeinter-relationships
Sifting schemes
Shifting schemes improve accuracyEnable assessment of model choiceCan look at error analysis
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
6/28
Shifting choicesUse a shift not dependent upon a model
Free shifting Gordon and Shaws scheme good for this
Model shiftingShift data using underlying functional modelMakes shift easier when less data available
Assumption is that model form is suitable fordata
Gordon and Shaw Method
Gordon and Shaw methodrelies upon reasonablequality data with sufficientdata points in eachisotherm to make theerror reduction process inoverlapping isothermswork wellGordon and Shaw usedsince good referencesource for computer code
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
7/28
Master Curve ProductionShifting Techniques (Gordon/Shaw)
Determine an initial estimate of the shift using WLF parameters andstandard constantsRefine the fit by using a pairwise shifting technique and straight linesrepresenting each data setFurther refine the fit using pairwise shifting with a polynomialrepresenting the data being shiftedThe order of the polynomial is an empirical function of the number of data points and the decades of time / frequency covered by theisotherm pairThis gives shift factors for each successive pair, which are summedfrom zero at the lowest temperature to obtain a distribution of shiftswith temperature above the lowestThe shift at T ref is interpolated and subtracted from everytemperatures shift factor, causing T ref to become the origin of theshift factors
Gordon and Shaw After 1 st estimate thepolynomial expression isoptimized using nonlineartechniques1st pairwise shift startsfrom coldest temperatureisothermProcedure is done for bothE and E
Could do on just E*, E(t),G(t), D(t), G* if these areall that is available butdefault is to do on loss andstorage parts of complexmodulus 1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
-3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Log Frequency, rads/sec
L o g
E ' , M P a
All IsothermsShifted 1st PairPoly. fit - 5th Order to 1st Pair
Shift = -1.31
3
40
30
20
10
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
8/28
Gordon and ShawEach pairwiseshift isdetermined
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
-7.0 -6.0 -5.0 -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
Log Frequency, rads/sec
L o g
E ' , M P a
All IsothermsShifted 10 CShifted 20 CShifted 30 CShifted 40 C
Shift =-1.31
3
40
30
2010
Shift =-2.35-1.04=-3.39
Shift =-1.31-1.04=-2.35
Shift =-3.39-1.15=-4.54
Summed pairwise shift for E'
Gordon and Shaw E
Implementation E shift
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
9/28
Gordon and Shaw E Implementation E shift
Gordon and Shaw stats
+/- 95% confidencelimits (t-statistic) based on Gordonand Shaw book Gives values forboth E, E and
averageComparison of shiftfactors also plotted
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
10/28
Gordon and Shaw shifts factorsIf shift factorsare verydifferent for E and E thenshifting maynot haveworked verywellMaybe need toconsider someother type of
shifting
Model shifting
Shifting to underlying modelIf material behavior is known, it canassist the shift by assumption of underlying model
Why would I do this?Example EXCEL solver used to giveshift parameters
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
11/28
Model shiftingWhy?
If data is limited to extent thatGordon and Shaw will not work orvisual technique is difficultFor example mixture data collectedas part of MEPDG does not havesufficient data on isotherms to allow
Gordon and Shaw to work well in allinstances 4 to 5 points per decadeis best
Typical mix data
Example mixdata setcollected forMEPDGanalysisNote on logscale data has
non-equalgaps with onlytwo points perdecade
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
12/28
Model fitModel shift providesthe result to be usedin a specific analysis
Models
Why we needed to consider differentmodels?
Working with some complex materialswe noted that the symmetric sigmoiddoes not provide a good fit of the data
We then started a look at other fittingschemes
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
13/28
Complex materials Asphalt materials can be formulatedwhich have complex master curves
Roofing compoundsThin surfacing materialsDamping materialsJointing/adhesive compounds
HMA with modified binders
Example thin surfacing on PCC
Material mixedwithaggregate andused as a thinsurfacingmaterial onconcretebridge decks
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
14/28
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
15/28
Models on these productsOn the three previous examples itwas observed that the master curveis not a represented by a symmetricsigmoid or CA style master curveNeed to consider something else!
Christensen-Anderson
CA, CAMIdea originally developed byChristensen and published in AAPT(1992)Work describes binder master curveand works well for non-modifiedbinders
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
16/28
Asphalt binder models, SHRPChristensen-Anderson -CA model (1993)
Relates G*( ) to G g, cand R Model for phase angleModel works well fornon-modified bindersModel is similar for G(t)or S(t) formatRelates to a visco-elasticliquid whereas materialsshown in previous slidesshow more solid typebehavior
Sigmoid - logistic
Standard logistic (Verhulst,1838)
Originally developed by aBelgium mathematicianUsed in MEPDGHas symmetrical properties
Applied to a wide variety of problems
Pierre Franois Verhulst
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
17/28
Mix models - Witczak Basic sigmoidfunctionBasis of Witczak model for asphaltmixture E* dataParametersintroduced to move
sigmoid to typicalasphalt mixproperties
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
x
y
)1(1
xe y
+
=
Witczak modelWitczak model parametersdefine the ordinates of thetwo asymptotes and thecentral/inflection point of thesigmoid, as follows:
10 = lower asymptote10(+ ) = upper asymptote10(/)= inflection point
Empirical relationships existto estimate and Model is limited in shape to asymmetrical sigmoidSigmoid has characteristicsof a visco-elastic solid
log( *) ( log ) E e t r = +
++
1
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
18/28
Other modelsStandard logistic will not work for all asphaltmaterials - what other choices do we have?
CASChristensen-Anderson modified by Sharrock
Allows variation in the glassy modulus useful forfilled systems below a critical amount of filler wherethe liquid phase is still dominant. Have used forroofing materials and mastics.
Gompertz (1825)Works well for highly filled/modified systems. Filledmodified joint materials and sealants.
Richards model (1959) Allows a non-symmetrical model format. Gives abetter fit for some jointing compounds and hot-mix-asphalt.
Weibull (1939) Allows non-symmetric behavior Added as an additional method
Note these are being used to describe the shape of master curve
+ d
+=
+
F
E
D x
eC B A E *)log(
Sigmoid - generalized logistic
Generalized logistic(Richards, 1959)
Introduces an extraparameter to allow non-symmetrical slopeParameter introduced thatallows inflection point tovary
Analysis also yields Standard logistic (as usedin MEPDG) and Gompertz(as special case) whenappropriate by data
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
19/28
Example thin surfacing on PCC
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
-9.0 -7.0 -5.0 -3.0 -1.0 1.0 3.0
Log Frequency (Reduced at 16 o C)
L o g
G *
Logistic SigmoidGompertz SigmoidWeibull SigmoidIsothermsG* - Shifted
0.0E+00
2.0E+08
4.0E+08
6.0E+08
8.0E+08
1.0E+09
1.2E+09
1.4E+09
1.6E+09
1.8E+09
2.0E+09
1.0E-09 1.0E-07 1.0E-05 1.0E-03 1.0E-01 1.0E+01 1.0E+03
Frequency (Reduced at 16 oC)
G *
Logistic Sigmoid
Gompertz Sigmoid
Weibull Sigmoid
Isotherms
G* - Shifted
Best fit is Gompertz
G*=Pa
Example roofing product
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
-12.00 -10.00 -8.00 -6.00 -4.00 -2.00 0.00 2.00
Log Frequency (Reduced at 16 oC)
L o g
G *
Logistic SigmoidGompertz SigmoidWeibull SigmoidIsothermsG* - Shifted
0.00E+00
1.00E+07
2.00E+07
3.00E+07
4.00E+07
5.00E+07
6.00E+07
7.00E+07
1.00E-11 1.00E-09 1.00E-07 1.00E-05 1.00E-03 1.00E-01 1.00E+01 1.00E+03
Frequency (Reduced at 16oC)
G *
Logistic SigmoidGompertz SigmoidWeibull SigmoidIsothermsG* - Shifted
Low stiffness=Weibull, high stiffness=Gompertz, best fit=Gompertz
G*=Pa
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
20/28
Example adhesive product
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
8.50
9.00
9.50
-12 .00 -10 .00 -8 .00 -6.00 -4.00 -2.00 0 .00 2 .00 4 .00Log Frequency (Reduced at 16 oC)
L o g
G *
Logistic SigmoidRichard's SigmoidGompertz SigmoidWeibull SigmoidIsothermsG* - Shifted
6.00E+00
2.00E+08
4.00E+08
6.00E+08
8.00E+08
1.00E+09
1.20E+09
- 12. 00 -1 0. 00 - 8. 00 - 6. 00 - 4. 00 - 2. 00 0. 00 2 .00 4 .0 0
Log Frequency (Reduced at 16 oC)
L o g
G *
Logistic SigmoidRichard's SigmoidGompertz SigmoidWeibull SigmoidIsothermsG* - Shifted
Low stiffness=Gompertz, high stiffness=logistic, best fit=GompertzHigh stiffness appears to have some errors!
G*=Pa
Prony series/D-S fits
In each of the examplesthe data is fitted toProny series relaxationand retardation spectrawith good fitsIf data is extended byuse of a sound
functional form model,this enables extensionof calculations inregions not tested bythe rheologymeasurements
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
21/28
Generalized logisticGeneralized logistic curve(Richards) allows use of non-symmetrical slopesIntroduction of additionalparameter T
When T = 1 equationbecomes standardlogisticWhen T tends to 0 then equation becomesGompertzT must be positive foranalysis of mixturessince negative values will
not have asymptote andproduces unsatisfactoryinflection in curveMinimum value of inflection occurs at 1/e or 36.8% of relativeheight
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
x
y T=-0.5T=0.0 GompertzT=0.6T=1.0 L ogisticT=2.0
T M x BTe y / 1)(( )1(
1
+=
B=M=1
Minimum inflection
Standard logistic inflection
Typical range in inflection values
HMA Standard vs. Generalized
Based on standard (logistic) sigmoid thegeneralized sigmoid formats are:-
/ 1log( )1(*)log( ++
+=e
E )log(1
*)log(
+++=
e E
)(log1*)log( M Be
A D E
++= T M BT
A D E
/ 1))(logexp(1(*)log(
++=
Standard logistic Generalized logisticMEPDG FORMAT
ALTERNATE FORM AT
=D, =A, = BM = -B, =T
= lower asymptote+ = upper asymptote
(/) = inflection point/frequency
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
22/28
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
-15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x
y
Generalized logistic example
Lower asymptoteEquilibrium modulus = 98 MPa
Upper asymptote =Equilibrium modulus = 22.3 GPa
Extension to HMA mixturesDo the generalized sigmoid enable a betterdefinition of HMA mixesLook at ALF mixtures
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
23/28
Generalized logistic example
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
-15 - 14 -13 - 12 - 11 - 10 -9 - 8 -7 - 6 -5 - 4 -3 - 2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0
x
y
Model fit
Compare errorsfrom differentmodel fits to assistwith determinationof correct form of
shifting
ALF1 AZCR 70-22
Equilibrium modulus
Equilibrium modulus
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
24/28
Model fitDifferentmodifiers mayneed differentmodels todefine mixbehavior
ALF7PG70-22 + Fibers
Equilibrium modulus
Equilibrium modulus
Error
Need to develop betterway of consideringerrors since most of error tends to occur atlimits
rms% values tend to below because of adequatefit for large amount of central data 0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
-10. 00 -8. 00 -6.00 -4. 00 -2. 00 0.00 2. 00
log frequency
e r r o r
%
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
25/28
Applied to ALF studyWhen methods appliedto ALF data only onedata set previousexample is close tosymmetrical standardlogisticMost data sets are betterrepresented by Richardsor Gompertz (specialcase of Richards - threeexamples)
In most cases inflectionpoint is lower than(Gglassy + G equilbrium )/2
Data qualityMore recent testing on mastercurves for mixes enables moredata points to be collected andwith better data quality furtherassessment of models can beconsideredNumber of testpoints/isotherm in presentMEPDG scheme is limitedresulting in numericalproblems in some shiftingschemesNeed in many cases toassume model as part of shiftdevelopment
1.0E+01
1.0E+02
1.0E+03
1.0E+04
1.0E+05
1.0E-01 1.0E+00 1.0E+01 1.0E+02
Frequency, Hz
E ' o r
E " , M P a
E ' E "
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
26/28
Objective of better modelsLeads to better calculations
Spectra calculations and interconversionsBetter definition of low stiffness and highstiffness properties are critical if consideringpavement performanceWork with damping calculationsWork looking at obtaining binder properties frommix dataPhase angle interrelationships
Considerable evidence that we should be using anon-symmetrical sigmoid function
Other non-symmetrical models
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
27/28
Francken and Verstaeten, 1974
Non-symmetricalsigmoid modelE*=E R*(f R )
R* - sigmoidfunction variesbetween 0 and 1
Bahia et al., 2001
NCHRP-Report 459 Bahia et al.
8/6/2019 Master Curve Stiffness Properties
28/28
SummaryStandard logistic symmetric sigmoidal
Data on more complex materials clearly does not conformObvious when looking at phase angle data versus reduced frequencyFor HMA same conclusion when apply free shifting
A few cases the generalized logistic gave a result close to the standardlogistic
Standard binder uses a non-symmetric function to describebehavior CA model this aspect is missing with the standardlogistic in HMA model
Generalized logistic non-symmetric sigmoidProvides a more comprehensive analysis toolBuilds on work of Fancken et al. and Bahia et al.Parameter introduced to allow variation of inflection point
Anticipated to become more important with more complex modifiedbindersIn most cases considered for HMA the inflection point is below themean of the Glassy and Equilibrium modulus valuesGeneralized logistic reduces to Gompertz at lower acceptable value of T or