Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
"iv63 - Q 30 Q tf S11l(1Q ·X-611-63-12 ,
MAGNETIC SURVEY DATA A'IAILABLE
PRIOR· TO " ,
THE WORLD MAGNET1C SURVEY EFFORT , . ~
.OF THE IQSY
OTS PRICE
XEROX $
111 CROF I LM $ __ ..-:::... __
PREPARED- BY- - - - - --
S. HENDRICKS
J. C. CAIN
------ GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ----GREENBELT, MD.
. ,
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19630013144 2020-07-19T02:11:06+00:00Z
MAGNETIC SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE PRIOR TO THE
WORLD MAGNETIC SURVEY EFFORT OF THE IQSY
by
S. Hendricks and J. C. Cain
Goddard Space Flight Center
Greenbelt, Maryland
ABSTRACT
Given are the distributions of magnetic survey information
available from all sources since 1900. The data are tallied
according to distribution by area and decade, and according
to component measured. Recommendations are made on the basis
of these studies for specific surveys during the IQSY.
(1964.0 - 1966.0)
Contents
page
I. INTRODUCTION ...................... 1
II. SOURCES ........................ 1
III. DATA PENDING ...................... 3
IV. DISTRIBUTIONS OF DATA .................. 3
1° By component and area
2. By decade and area
3. By year
4. By altitude
V. DENSITIES OF DATA .................... 5
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE SURVEYS ........... 7
TABLES
i. Number of points per i0 ° block of latitude-longitude
a. Declination
b. Inclination
c. Horizontal Intensity
d. Vertical Intensity
e. Total Field
f. Total Observations
2. Number of observations per i0 ° block by decade
a. 1900-1909
b. 1910-1919
c. 1920-1929
d. 1930-1939
e. 1940-1949
f. 1950-1959
g. 1960-1961
3. Number of component observations per year
4. Number of component observations per kilometer of altitude
5. Area of latitude-longitude Blocks
,
2.
FIGURES
Number of observations per 105km 2 (data 1900-1961)
Number of observations per 105km 2 (data since 1955.0)
I. INTRODUCTION
In an attempt to obtain the most accurate reference field
possible for future use in reducing satellite data, all available
magnetic survey data are being collected for incorporation into a
computer program that produces a set of spherical harmonic
coefficients which fit the data. The purpose of this report is
to assess the data presently available and to make recommendations
for additional acquisitions.
II. SOURCES
The major portion of the present information has been supplied
by the U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey which provided a punched
card copy of the data from which their 1955 charts were derived.
These are observations dating from 1900 which have been accrued
from approximately 500 sources. As with all data in this report,
an attempt was made to differentiate between originally observed
values and those which were computed, so that the basic data would
consist only of observed values. Due to the wide variety of
sources, this deletion was not always feasible but, on the basis
of the information available, some editing was done as follows:
(1) The horizontal and vertical intensity values were
eliminated from USCGS measurements,
(2) In addition, the vertical intensity value was dropped
from surface observations if a particular datum contained
values for inclination and horizontal intensity, and was
from a source other than a U. S. observatory.
- 2 -
Since analysis of these observations will also involve
studies of secular change, it was deemed desirable to delete
values which had been reduced to epoch. On the basis of this
premise some 21,300 observations from a Russian publication*
which had been reduced to epoch 1940 were removed from the main
block of data with the hope that it may be possible to replace
them with the original data.
Data were also received from the U. S. Oceanographic Office.
These 32,000 observations were the result of Project Magnet, an
airborne survey in which measurements of F, I, and D were averaged
over five minute intervals along track lines covering most of the
northern hemisphere other than the Soviet Union and China.
A third source of information was the Canadian Department of
Mines and Technical Surveys which, since 1953, has conducted an
airborne survey, mainly in that North American area, resulting in
nearly 12,000 H, Z, and D observations (5 minute averages).
The Geophysical and Polar Research Institute of the University
of Wisconsin has provided about 2400 observations of total field in
the area around the South Pole.
Compounded systematic catalog of magnetic determinations of the
general magnetic survey of the USSR, 1931-1942, Scientific
Research Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, 1947.
- 3 -
The Southern and Indian Oceans, and the South China Sea were
surveyed by the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition with a
ship-towed magnetometer. Their report (Nagata, et al, 1961)
supplied another 5000 observations of total field, approximately
half of which have been incorporated in this summary.
Total field measurements from the Vanguard III satellite
(1959 Eta) comprised the sixth major source of data. The 85 day
active life of the proton precession magnetometer provided 2797
observations over South America, Southern Africa, Australia,
California, and the east coast of the U. S. (Cain, et al, 1962).
III. DATA PENDING
In addition to the data covered by this report, a set of
total field readings obtained on cruises of the R/V Vema from
1959-62 and compiled by Lamont Geological Observatory are currently
being processed. This will add 3600 observations in southern ocean
areas.
Arrangements are being made in conjunction with the USCGS to
receive from the Geophysical and Polar Research Institute of the
University of Wisconsin a more recent series of total field
observations in the Arctic and Antarctic areas.
IV. DISTRIBUTIONS OF DATA
The above sources of data were converted to a standard format
and recorded on magnetic tape. Each of the 152,424 observations
was written with information regarding its position (latitude and
longitude in degrees, altitude in kilometers) and time (in Julian
- 4 -
days and fractions of a day since 1900), plus the measured values
for one or more components of the magnetic field. This tape was
scanned and the data were tabulated in the following ways:
(1) By component and area - Tables 1 (a) through 1 (e) show
the number of points in each 10° x 10° block of latitude
and longitude for observations of declination,
inclination, horizontal intensity, vertical intensity,
and total field. Longitude numbers refer to the eastern
boundary of the block (i.e. the longitude block labeled-
160 extends from 170°W to 160°W). The values from these
five tables were combined to give the totals which appear
in Table 1 (f).
(2) By decade and area - In order to determine how frequently
and how recently a particular region had been covered,
the data were divided into 10 year blocks and the
latitude - longitude distribution was compiled for each
decade. Table 2 (a through g) displays these figures
which, as with Table 1 (f), represent the sum of all
component measurements. Most of the polar data has
been accrued since 1950 and, although the total number
of points (57527) already accumulated in the present
decade is great in comparison with previous years,
there are vast regions over the ocean areas and over
the Soviet Union where no new data are available.
(3) By year - A more general breakdown in time is given
- 5 -
in Table 3 where the number of points for each
component is tallied for each year.
(4) By altitude - Although the preponderance of data
are surface observations, recent airborne surveys
have supplied considerable data up to 7 or 8
kilometers. This distribution is shown in Table 4.
Total field measurements taken by the Vanguard III
satellite provided data in the region from 510 to
3750 kin. altitude (Cain, et.al., 1962).
V. DENSITIES OF DATA
The large difference between the amount of surface area
covered by a 10 ° square at the equator and a similar square in
polar regions made it desirable to use another method for
illustrating distributions. The number of square kilometers in
each block was calculated using the formula:
jA - 360/_ in (@+Z_ _ ) - sin @
where R (earth's radius) was taken to be 6371.2 km, _ _ and
_ were i0 ° and _ was the latitude of the southernJ
boundary of the block. These areas are listed in Table 5.
Dividing the number of points in each block of Table 1 (f) by
the area A for that block gave the number of observations per
square kilometer. These figures were multiplied by a scale
factor of 105 to produce the results displayed in Figure i.
Z
O
Z
.2
%,)uJ
OC_
Oa0
O
O,0
O
U%
O
4"
O
O04
O,-4
O
O,-4
I
O
od
!
O
I
O
-4"
I
O
I
0
I
II
Z I'-0 I
0
,'_ co
CO
00
0 I
dZ
_N__O_O_OON_O0_O0000
_0_
_O___O_O_O_o_ONO_N_
N
__OON__O_O___
__0¢¢_¢_O_O_O__OO___N_¢_O_¢_O_¢OO _N
__O__NO_N____
O_O__
___O_
O_OOOOO_OO_OOOOOOOOOOO_OOOON_O_
N
O_OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO_
oOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
__111111111 ___
IIIIIIII
E_
tm
j-%
IIIlilll
_IIIIIIIII__
O000000000OO00OO00000000000OO0000000
00000000000000000000000000000000_0
__00_0____
_0_0_0___0__
_0000__
_0_00_0_
__0_
_0__0___
000000000000_00_0___0_0__
_0
0
0
0
.L-
0
0
.4
0
0
0
0
0
%m
0
O"
0
-.4
0
0
_00
Z
C)
0
0
m
Z0'I
II
-4
F-
--4
Z
ZC3_4CJ-c
('4
IIo0
Z[D
tu
u9au
u.(:3
Z
O
O,
O
(D
O
,O
O
O
.,I"
O
O
O,-4
O
O0000000__O00_O_O_O0_N_N_O0000000
_0__0_0_ _00______O_ N __ _ _ _00_
_0___
___0
_ _0_
_0_0______
(:3
0CM
0
0
0
0
,0
(3
p_
0CO
00_0000__000000_0_0_0_0_000
O_O_OOOOOO_OOOOOOOOOOO_OOOO_O_ _
0_00000000000000000000000000000000
(DO_
OOO000000000000000000000000000000000
IIIIIIII
v
,"4
,.-1
IIIIIIII
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
000000000000000000000000000000000000
000_00_0_00_00OOCO000_OCO000OO000
U_0000000000,Z)00000E)0000000_-_000000O000
_00_00000000__00000_0_0000000000_
OO0_-4OOOOOOOO0,-"__'40OOOOOOO00O'DOOOOOCo4""D
OOO,'-'._'-OO_-'OOOOOOOO.000000"4,OOOOOOOOOO.00O
OOOO_OOOOO_OO_OOOOO_OOOOOOO_OO
__._o__- OOOOOU_O_-."OOOOOOOOO._OOOOOO_._OOOO-40O
OOOO0"O"_"O-."OOOO.__"_OOOOOO_-,0"_..._OOO...__._OO
OOO_OOOOO_OO__O_O_OO__OOOO
O_OOOOOOOO__OOO___OOOO
_OOOOO_OOO_O___
O_O__N_
_O___
0000000".40OO0"O4_'.__.,"O_-.'OOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOO_'_'OOOOOOOOOOOO_._OOOOOOOOOO
O
,,0"1'1O
O
_D
]1>
II
O,
o._
0
0
0
0
0
t_
0
0
0
-,4
0
0
0
m
r-
_D..JuJ
J
C9
O
O
O
O,,3
O
u'%
O4"
O0%
O
o,J
O,-4
('9
O
04
Oo_
O
O
O
u'%
,4" O,0
7- m-
{23 !
LU !U9
0
0tl. 0_
O !
d7
_ONN_OO__N_OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
__O__O__O_OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
_0_ _O_O_O_OOOOOOOOOOOO_
_0__ _0¢¢___000000__
_0¢__
00__
_O_O____OOOO_
_OOOO_ ____0___0__0____0__
___0__00_0
_000000_ m_O_O_O__O_O__O_
_0000000_0 ¢__00¢0N¢_¢000_0_0_¢_
_0_ _ _ __
_OOOOOOO_ _CO0000_O0000000__
_ _ _ _00_
0000000000 OOOOOOOOO_OOOOOOO_O_
¢0000000000000000000_0_0000000¢_0_0
_OOOOO_O_OOOO_OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO_
00000_¢_0000000000000000000000000
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
__O___ _N__O_N__
__ I I I I I I I I I ___
IIIIIIII
v
P4
6"
llllJili
O00000000_O00QOOOOOOOOQCO00000000CO0
_O000000000_O0000OOO000._0_0
_0___4____O_O__O__M__O_
0__
___0_
O0000_O0_N_O_O__P_N_
Z
CD
C9
L_rrl
_>
C'_
H
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O,0
0
0
,0
0
C
r-
O
C_
0
.-4
D
I
0
0
,.a
mC
,H
>.
0
U-
Z
0
I,--
0
II
Z0
0
u.
0
Z
0
0
0b,.
00000000000_00_00000_000000000_00000
0000000_0_000_00_0__0_00_
0
,0
0
0
0
0N
0,-4
0
0..4
0
N
C_
0
,,1"
0
,0
0p,.
0
_0 _ _
0_
_O_NO¢O__0_¢
_00___0_0_0
_ ___ _0_
_00000_0000_0_0_00000_0_000_
O0_O00OON_O00_O__O_O0000_O0_
O000000_O0_O_N__OOO_OOOOOO_N
__000000_000000___00000_
00000000000_00000000000_0000_
_000000000000000000000000000000_
0000000000000000000000000000000000_0
O0000000000000000000000000OO00000000
__ I I I I I I I I I ___
IIIIIIII
v
,-1
[_
L'zJ
L_O
IIII1111
IIIIIIIII__
000000000000000000000000000000000000
_O00OO00000000000_O000000000000000
_O_OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO_OOOOOO_OO_
_O_O_O_____OOO_
_o_..-_._o_,._oo0._0.oooooooo_,.ooooo
O
_c
G.)
--4(D
O"
O
O
.mO
O
O
O
m
]m-4
Z
ii
_n
.-4
,.0
tk)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O"O
...4O
O
(D
uo
--4
C
CD
(D
_0
..<
rm
_0u,
O
-4
"I-_0
,O
OOOOOOOO_OOO_OOOOOOOOOOOOOO_OOOOOOO
O
00'
O0000000000000000000_NO_O00000000000
O4
O"
Ii--
0e_
O",-4
V_
U2
>-
0
U.
C9
u%
COU_
U%
04
I!
u9
Z
[.9
UJu%
C_
U.0
Z
0
0
0
,0
0u%
0
4"
0
0
0,-4
0
C_,.4
0
04
0
0
,4"
0U%
0,0
0
0aO
0
O_
_000000000_000_000_0__00__
_0_00_0_00 ___0_0_000000_
_ _0_
_____0_0_000
_0_00_ 00_0_000_00__0_0_0
0_0_000_
_0_0000_0
_000__0_00_0__
O00000000000000000000000000000000000
O0OO0000000000000000000000000000OOC'O
000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000__0___ ___0__
IIIIIIII
-j
C_
_a
r,
_0
0.
IIIIIIII
OOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO_O
C5.DOOO,D¢_,OOOOOO,DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOC___O
GOOOOOOOOOOOOO(DOOOOOOOf_._OOOOOO(DOOOOOO
GOOOOG_OOOGOOC-OCDoOOOOO_OOOOOOOOOO
_00OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO00_OOOOOOOOOO
_O_O_OOOOOOOOO_OOOOOO_OOOOOOOOOO
O_O_OOOOOO_OOOOOO_O_OO_OOOOOOO
_OOOOO_O__OOOO__OOOOOO_OO_
OOO,.-"OOOOOO.."._O,._OOO._O_O_,__._OOOOOOOO
_O_OOOO_O_OOOO_OOOOOOOOOO
OOO___O__OOOOO__OOO_O_
_O_OOOO__OOOOO
ooo_oo_oooo;o__oooo_"_O_OOOOO
__00000__
OO_OOO___O_OOO_OOOOOO_OO
OOOOOOOO__OO_O_O_OOO_OOOOOOOOOOOO
I
,O
O
Z
O
C)
"m
C)
u,%Irn
O<
--4ZOOn
I
O"
O
I
'.4=4
.-4I
O
I
O
I
O
I
Z_
O
O
O
4"O
O
O
-4O
CO
O
,0O
-4
-4
Z
0
-<
0
,0
a".4-o,
D
m_I
0
O"
0
U,.
Z0
I.-.
0O"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
N
!
0
!
0
0 0
I
0
I
IIC'_
Z I_
0 I
l,-
ua I
0
0
ID I
_0000000000_00000000000_000000000000
0_00__000000 O_O_OOOO_O_OOOOO
_OOOOOOOO_OO_OO
O_NO_O_O_O00 _ __o_o_O_O_OO_O_
O0OOO__ooo_om_@oo_o_@_oo000
_O_OOO__OOOO_ _O_O_O_OO_O_
O000000_N_O00_ _00_00_00000
OOOOOOOOO_OOO_O_OO__N_OO_O
00000000__000_0_000_00_0_0
O000000000_c_.%OCO0_O000_O0_OOC
0000000000_0_00000_000000_0_00
OOOCOOOOOO_OOOO_O_OOOOOOOO__O_
_OOOOOOOO_OOOOOOOOOOOO_OOOOOO_OO_
OOOOOOOOOO_OO_OOOOOOOOOOOO_OOOOOO
_OOOO_OOO_OOCOOOOOOOOOOC_COOOOOO_O
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
00000_000000000000000000000000000000
__0___ ___0__
IIIIIIII
O_
tO
IIIIIIII
O00000000000000000000000000QO0000000
OGOOOOOOOOGC_O0000000000000000000000
_OO00000_O0000000000_O0000000_O_mO
0000_0_0__000000_0_000000_0000
_0____0_,-'0000000_0"
0_0_0_0__00__OOOOOOOO_
_____::_:_o_O_O_O_O__O_
_.*C0O_0".4_..,O
OOOOOOOOOOOO_OOOOO___O__
;Z
(D
O
_0"1'1O
C_
CD
mO__
II
0
O'.4
4"
..4
O
O
O
O
O
O
.&.,O
O
O
".4
O
O
_O
O
Z
O
-<I"1'1
0
--t
"r
,0
a,,-4
a_
T
O
,O
&,9
aC
C_
U.
Z
O
O_0
O
O,0
O
O
O
.'%
O04
O
O
O,.-4
O
O4
O
O
.4"
,/O4U'%
m- O
,0
7 r'-
_' CO
0
0
0
O_O__O_OO_N_OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
O_ON__N_N
__O_
_OO_O_OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
_O_O_ __OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
___O
_ _N_O_
_NO__OOOOOOOOOOOOOO_
_0_0_
0__0_
__0__NNN_
0__@_0000000000000@@ ___$_ OON
_0_ _NN_ _N
_N__N_OOOOOO_N_O0
__oN_O_0_ _0
O0 O_NOO__O__
_0__ ___OO_
_OOOOO_OO _O_O__ON__N_O_O__ ___00__ _0_0
O00OO000_O0_O0000_O_O000000_O0_
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO_OOOOOCOOOOO_
_0000000000000_00000_0000000_0_0
00000__00000000o00_000000000o000
OOO000000000000000000000000000000000__N_O___ ___0__
__111111111 ___
IIIIIIII
v
E_
oo.=,o,,,o,***,•o=,,o.,**•,•ooo***,_.*****.*,_.**•,*_*_o*,o.•••
O_N_O0_O0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
o-M
o o__i_ _ _ oo__ _ _ O_o_oo__..4!
[
O _D OOO O1 _.O C_1_) _D
O
t_
_ -,-I
_ 0
m __ 0
I
O
0-el I
¢Xl t_. Ol Ol _) ¢.Oi 00 r-_• ,_ o0 Ol 0o O_l _-_ ,-4 ¢0
4._
OO
o _ Ol ¢O _'( LO _D _'. OO 00O I I I I I I I I
- 6 -
Thus, for an equatorial block, where one degree equals 111 km,
a value of 1000 for a 10 ° block would represent data points at
an average of approximately 10 km intervals. It can be seen
from the figure that the density in areas near the magnetic
poles compares favorably with that over most of the larger land
masses. The numbers above 10 are rounded to the nearest
10 _bs/105 kin23 •
LATITUDE
TABLE 5
AREA (10 5 kin)
0°-i0 ° 12.3
10°-20 ° ii .9
200-30 ° ii .2
300-40 ° lO. 1
40o-50 ° 8.7
50 °- 60 ° 7.1
o60 - 70° 5.2
70 °- 80 ° 3.2
800-90 ° 1.1
160' 165' ISO' us· 120· lOS' 90' 75' 60' 45 ' 30' IS' 0' .5' 45 ' 60' 75' 105- 120· 135- ISO' 165· 160' lO' 90· 90.
E 6 100 140 60 60 80 120 180 410 190 140 130 40 60 50 60 90 50 20
~~lwl I I I I .I_~ l ~~'" ~~
1--1-- - , -r- -, --, - ---[---,- --r
~+-~-r-r-+~~r-r-+-1--r-+~~--r-+-1-~-r-+~--r-+-~~-+-+-1--r-+-+--r-r-+~~~r-+-4-~-r~-1~~~+-4--r-+~~~r-+-4-~-r-+~--~+-+-~~-+~~~r-+-4-~-r-4~' ~
f5ll~ l,loll~l.)~ ~ tOO 140 140 30 t 111 tLt2~11l+f1 f l-Dll t 1 t1 t 1 t l tit l tit 1 t I t _l t 1 tl tz~ tI15~ ~U' ~i- -- t-.-l-/1qfl I til l I l I l ~ ~ --r- --rt j l l 1 I II I I I . j ~ l 1 I I I ~ j l ~ I I l!f-r~
t't!l~+z -r 9ft J11111111.., 11111111
.80' 165' .50'
-+- 60 + 44Of-
t5°II0
17°T'OI I I I I I I I I T I I I I I I -tH.i1!"'1! 11111", .. "1"J",, .,.J'l1 "J,", ,111,,1 ".1111 1111111 11111111111J"" 1111.", i1l1t" ,,,i,,, ",J'''I, .. l ", "..1 ... ""til' .. Jilt! ."1.,, "JI1I1 ,,,llllll1
Ui' 420· 40S· '90' '5' 010' "5' 30 IS' 0' U ' 3'" "5 010' "5
+ ILI,J,IJ,I,tI,j,l.l.,III,I.].J '90' 10. no' 115 150' .6i '80'
5 2 DENSITY OF MAGNETIC SURVEY OBSERVATIONS 1900-~961 (OBS PER 10 km ) FIGURE 1
- 7 -
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE SURVEYS
Vestine (1961) has suggested that data obtained since
1955.0 be considered as part of the World Magnetic Survey.
Figure 2 shows the density of data per 105 km 2 in 10 ° squares
since 1955, and hence, by Vestine's criterion, a tabulation of
the coverage already achieved by the WMS. In order to obtain
the desired accurate representation of the field at ionospheric
altitudes and above, a minimum grid spacing of i00 km should be
achieved. This would mean raising the numbers in each block of
Figure 2 to 12 or more. It can readily be seen from this figure
that there are large areas over the globe where this minimum
cr_erion is not yet met. Detailed recommendations for new
surveys must of course be made bearing in mind not only the
density of observations in a given area but also such considera-
tions as the usefulness of past observations, the existence of
data taken but not available, and known firm plans for surveys.
The usefulness of past observations is a complex subject
involving not only their accuracy and space-time distribution
but also the rates of secular change. The needs can thus best
be defined in relation to given areas. The purpose of this
report is to be a general guide and not to delve into these
questions in great detail.
The most striking gaps in Figure 2 appear in the southern
hemisphere. It points out that to equalize the distributions
it would be useful to concentrate the major efforts in these
135- 180-135' IBO' 165' ISO' 110' 105' 90' 75' 60' 45' 30' 90' 150· 165· IS' O' IS' 45' 75' 60' 30' 90-rmnmmmmmrrrrrmnmmmmmmmmnmmmmmnmrTTTlTTT1TTTTTTTrmnnmmmmmmTTTTlTTTTTTT1TlITTTmTT1TlTTTTTTTTTTT'!TT1TT!'TTT'lTTTTTTTTTT1TTTTmTTTTTTTTTITnrnTTrnTI'TTT~~~
I I I I- -+- 8 10 9 20 30 50 120 150 40 50 20 10 10 20 10
I CI.~ I ~ I~I I I I I IL..LI I 1 ~.·~:~'1 I I I I r&
I I I I I I ~~-- I I I ~ t{ I I I I~-I I I I~- I I~- I I I I I I I 0 I I l!)r 3 45'1= -+- -+- -+- -r -r- -+- -r- -r- -t- -t- '- -r- -I- -+- -I- -+- -+- -+- -+- -+- 10 -+- -+- -+- -r- -+- -+- -j- -+- -t- 7 - 9 -I- 10 - I- 20 -I- 20 -+- ;'$"'30 -? 45'
I I I I I I 1 I J 1 ~ 11 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 J I I I I I I I I I I :
~ ~ -r I -r- I -f- I _ _ I _ _ I - I- I _ _ I _ _ I -f- I -r- I ~ ~ _ _ I _ _ I -f- I _ _ I -f- I -f- I -r- I __ I __ I ~ _I- ~ _ _ II _ _ I _ _ I +_ I _ _ I _ _ I -r- I _ _ I -f- I __ I __ I ~ __ ! __ I ~ +- I ~ ~
180·
wi I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ w
-;0+ I I _ I + I I I ~ I _~ 1 __ 1 _~ 1 o .. ;.1.~J _~ I +- I __ I+- I +- 1 +- 1 _ I __ 1 -0 Lf- '~ -V-: __ I _~ I -0 I -0 I -f-I _~I-'::I:--I--==--! ,H1, -- I __ JO -f- I ~
I I I I I ( 1 \ r-. lA _~ v+- ---r-."VV I I I I "- lIt"'-h J :: ~ I I I I __)-r ~'J) ~lJ'~ I 1'- - I I I I T"u :: ·~j·~~·.~.~Icff;'(T:-'I-~r~r-'rr~I --I-- I- ~-F~-v~t I +- I +- I+- 1-- 1 -0 1-- 1 +- I--I-~ I -0 I -0 1+ 1--1-0 1 + 1-0 rr-~~lt ~ ~
lIIJlJlIIIIIIIIIIIIIlIllItltltILltILI,I"ILIJl,l,ltIJ1tILIJ1,1,1 11,1, 1,1,,1.1, 11111,1,,1,1,l. IBO' 165' ISO' 135' 110' 105' 90' 75' 60' '5' 30' IS' O' .
-
!-'.::
45' 60' 75' ,,;)- 30' 90' ISO' OS' 110' 135' 165'
DENSITY OF MAGNETIC SURVEY OBSERVATIONS 1955-1961 (OBS PER 10 5km2) FIGURE 2
- 8 -
areas, even if some of the high density areas were temporarily
neglected. A point worthy of mention in this connection is
that almost all of the data south of 30°S latitude is scalar B
as a result of proton magnetometer measurements by ship, air-
craft, and satellite. There is indication that the Zarya data
(Benkova and Tyurmina, 1961) will be helpful in filling in the
gap in the Indian Ocean and in some regions of the south Atlantic
down to about 40°S. The rest of the vast regions of the Pacific
and Antarctic need much further work.
The region of the Asian landmass is one where, hopefully,
it will be possible to obtain data already in existence but not
yet published.
There are also surprising gaps over other regions such as
South America, Africa, Australia and Greenland where one would
normally expect a better coverage. It is hoped that this
report will be useful in bringing forth existing data in these
and other areas.
REFERENCES
!
Benkova, N. P., and L. O. Tyurmina, Analytical representation
of the geomagnetic field over the territory of the Soviet
Union for the 1958 epoch, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy,
Vol. i, 81-96, 1961.
Cain, J. C., I. R. Shapiro, J. D. Stolarik, and J. P. Heppner,
Vanguard 3 magnetic field observations, J. Geophys.
Research_ 67, 5055-5069, 1962.
Nagata, T., T. Oguti, and S. Kakinuma, Results of geomagnetic
total force surveys over Southern Ocean, Indian Ocean and
South China Sea, National Antarctic Committee, Science
Council of Japan, March, 1961.
Vestine, E. H., Instruction manual on World Magnetic Survey,
Union Geodesique et Geophysique Internationale, N°ll,
August, 1961.