57
Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance Practices

Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

  • Upload
    buibao

  • View
    258

  • Download
    10

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance Practices

Page 2: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 2

Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance Practices

Experience with composite components

Damages on composite components

Damage detection

Repair processes and materials

Repair quality assurance

Total maintenance life cycle cost

Lufthansa perspectives

Page 3: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 3

Experience with composite components

B787

B7570

10

20

40

50

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

B767

A380

A320A340 A330

A300

A310

0

30

0

B737X

A350

A320X

% o

f Com

posi

te S

truc

ture

rela

ted

to to

tal

Airc

raft

Stru

ctur

al W

eigh

t

A310

@@ @

@@@

@

B737-300

B777

Page 4: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 4

Experience with composite components

A310-200 /-300 composite materials application

A 310-200 without composite vertical tail

Page 5: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 5

Experience with composite components

A340-500 /-600 composite materials application

Page 6: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 6

Experience with composite components

After 24 years of operational, maintenance and repair experience it can be concluded that:

Composite structural components will experience damages.

Damage detection requires specific skills.

Repair processes and materials are not standardized.

Repair quality is material and process dependent.

Difficult to asses quality of repair.

The total maintenance life cycle cost has not always provento be better than for comparable metallic structures.

Page 7: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 7

Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance Practices

Experience with composite components

Damages on composite components

Damage detection

Repair processes and materials

Repair quality assurance

Total maintenance life cycle cost

Lufthansa perspectives

Page 8: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 8

Damages on composite components

Prevalent damages on composite structural componentscan result from:

ground service vehicles

runway debris, tire separation

bird strike

lightning

hailstorm

overheat

erosion

surface coating removal

fluid contamination

design failures

manufacturing deficiencies

maintenance errors

Page 9: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 9

Damages on composite components

Total damages – Total fleet – Year 2006

1248

184216

Mechanical impact

Lightning Strike

Fleet Size: 243 a/cTotal damages: 1647 eventsRepair Cost: € 33.200.000

Bird strike

Page 10: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 10

Damages on composite components

Fuselage structural damages – Total fleet – Year 2006

7716

45

Mechanical impact

Bird Strike

Lightning Strike

Fleet Size: 243 a/cFuselage damages: 138 eventsRepair Cost: € 3.500.000

Page 11: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 11

76

63

Fuselage Structural damages – Total Fleet – Year 2006

Narrow body

Wide body

Fleet size:

Wide body: 99 a/cNarrow body: 144 a/c

Damage Frequency:

Wide body: every 1000 flightsNarrow body: every 4600 flights

Damages on composite components

Page 12: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 12

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)ground service vehicles

Page 13: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 13

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)ground service vehicles

Page 14: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 14

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)towing damage

Page 15: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 15

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)towing damage

Page 16: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 16

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)docking damage

Page 17: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 17

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)Passenger fly bridge

Page 18: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 18

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)ground service vehicles

Page 19: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 19

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)ground service vehicles

Reversertranslating sleeve

Page 20: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 20

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)ground service vehicles

Page 21: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 21

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)runway debris - damage on horizontal stabilizer

Page 22: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 22

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)tire separation

Parts of a tire or debris on therunway may damage compositestructures heavily.

Page 23: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 23

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)bird strike

Bird strike results in heavy structuraldamages. Affected areas areradomes, engines and leading edges.

Page 24: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 24

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)bird strike

Page 25: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 25

Damages on composite components

Lightning

Lightning strike on a CF6-80 translatingcowling

Composite materials are electric conductors.Because of thermal overload and/or sparking,adjacent fasteners have to be changed after lightning damage.

Page 26: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 26

Damages on composite components

Lightning

Lightning strike on CFM56-5A Fan Reverser

Page 27: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 27

Damages on composite components

Lightning

Page 28: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 28

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)hailstorm

Hailstorm damage often occurs on leadingedges, engine nose cowl and radome areas.

Hailstorm damage isfrequently more difficult to detect on compositestructures.

Page 29: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 29

Damages on composite components

Foreign Object Damage (FOD)hailstorm

Page 30: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 30

Damages on composite components

Overheat

Fan cowl overheat damageresulted from failed anti-iceduct clamp

Page 31: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 31

Damages on composite components

Surface protection

Cracks in the surface protectioncoat suggest structural damageswhich could result in a prematureremoval of the component.

Source of the cracks is not yetcompletely identified, but can berelated to the excessive filler thicknessor to a change in the paint flexibilityby a chemical interaction with thecomposite resin hardener.

Page 32: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 32

Damages on composite components

Surface protection

Page 33: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 33

Damages on composite components

Fluid contaminationwater in an elevator

Water enters the elevator honeycomb core through fastener holes due tocomponent „breathing“.Repairs are difficult and time consuming.

Page 34: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 34

Damages on composite components

Fluid contamination

General problem on many honeycomb sandwich components

Fish is stillswimming !

Page 35: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 35

Damages on composite components

Manufacturing deficiencies

Surface treatment on honeycomb foil leads to poor bonding properties

Page 36: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 36

Damages on composite components

Manufacturing deficiencies

Surface treatment on honeycomb foil leads to poor bonding properties

Page 37: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 37

Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance Practices

Experience with composite components

Damages on composite components

Damage detection

Repair processes and materials

Repair quality assurance

Total maintenance life cycle cost

Lufthansa perspectives

Page 38: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 38

Damage detection

Many damages on composite structures are difficult to detect visually and / or require special trained technicians and special equipment to be detected.

Fluid ingress on honeycomb sandwich components.

Overheat on structures covered with heat insulation blankets.

Lightning damage secondary effects.

Barely visible impact damages (BVID).

x

x

x

x

x xx x x x

BVI

D*

Com

pres

sion

stre

ngth

afte

r im

pact

Impact energy

Not visible Visible on the back surface

Visible on both faces

* BVID = Barely Visible Impact Damage

Page 39: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 39

Damage detection

Visible damage on outside surface

Total damage on inner side of structure

Page 40: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 40

Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance Practices

Experience with composite components

Damages on composite components

Damage detection

Repair processes and materials

Repair quality assurance

Total maintenance life cycle cost

Lufthansa perspectives

Page 41: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 41

Repair processes and materials

The repair of damages experienced in daily aircraft operation ishindered by following peculiarities on the repair process and repair material area:

ProcessStandard repairs have only been developed for minor , “cosmetic” type damages.Lack of design information (material, lay up sequence, …) to assist in new repair development.Missing of an agreed upon minimal substantiation criteria acceptable to the authorities.Repair substantiation often requires full scale test articles.Repair quality very much process dependent.Special dedicated training required for maintenance and shop composite repair personnel.

Page 42: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 42

Repair processes and materials

MaterialLack of material standardization, there is no worldwide official identification system establishing the equivalence between two or several materials.

Perishable material with limited storage life.Availability in small quantities very difficult and often with long lead times.Material for older products often not in production any more.Incoming material quality assurance inspection requires extensive equipment and special skills.

Page 43: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 43

Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance Practices

Experience with composite components

Damages on composite components

Damage detection

Repair processes and materials

Repair quality assurance

Total maintenance life cycle cost

Lufthansa perspectives

Page 44: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 44

Repair quality assurance

The peculiarity of all bonded composite repairs is that the quality strength wise of the of the bonded joint and the laminate build up can not be measured without destroying the part. There is an equivalency to the welding process and a similar industry standard as established since many years for the welder qualification and process control should be implemented for bonded and composite repairs, i.e.:

Dedicated training and qualification, including recurrent training to maintain the skills.

Periodic showing of compliance with the acquired skills.

Process control coupon destructive testing.

Material control coupon destructive testing.

Page 45: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 45

Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance Practices

Experience with composite components

Damages on composite components

Damage detection

Repair processes and materials

Repair quality assurance

Total maintenance life cycle cost

Lufthansa perspectives

Page 46: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 46

Total maintenance life cycle cost

Aircraft StructureMaintenance Life Cycle Cost

Aircraft StructureMaintenance Life Cycle Cost

Temporary Spares

Parts Lease

Modification kit:Labor & Material

Cost

Additional Training,Tooling &

Documentation Cost

InsuranceDelta Fuel

Costdue to:

Weight

Drag

Cooling

H.P.extraction

Maintenance SparesHolding

OperationalInterruption

Delay

Cancellation

In FlightTurn Back

Diversion

Down Time

Evaluation

Repairon

Plane

Remove/Reinstall

Repairin Shop

Unscheduled

InspectionOverhaulRemovalReinstall

Repairon

Plane

Remove/Reinstall

Overhaulin Shop

Repairin Shop

Scheduled

LINE :SCHEDULED :SHOP :

Disposal / Surplus Cost

Non Recurring Cost Recurring / OperatingCost

ModificationCost

Initial SparesProvisioning Cost

Page 47: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 47

Total maintenance life cycle cost

Economic Decision Tree AVAILABLEI Design Task Group INFORMATIONI Recommendation

Repair I RangeI

Tools Spares I Weight FuelI limit burnI

Maintenance I Cost of Implementation Operatingcost I (Acquisition cost) cost

I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

UNKNOWN CostINFORMATION effective? No

Yes

Page 48: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 48

Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance Practices

Experience with composite components

Damages on composite components

Damage detection

Repair processes and materials

Repair quality assurance

Total maintenance life cycle cost

Lufthansa perspectives

Page 49: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 49

Lufthansa perspectivesDamage prevention

Damage prevention activitiesCampaign with mayor hubs, Frankfurt and Munich for awareness and damage reduction.

Flyer and Poster distribution.

Awareness sessions to highlight a/c docking, towing and loading procedures.

Information visits of airport personnel at repair stations.

Main message: “it is better to pay attention!”

Page 50: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 50

Lufthansa perspectivesTraining

Dedicated training for composite maintenance, repair and engineering personnel.Training courses for technicians, engineers and inspectors developed at Lufthansa Technical Training using as guideline:

CACRC training curricula (AIR 4938A, AIR 5278, AIR 5279)FAA / AMTAS / Edwards C.C. Teaching Points ( AIR 5719)

Additional engineering attendance at:Alteon Composite Repair course for engineers.Abaris Composite Repair course for engineers.Fraunhofer Institute / IFAM European Bonding Engineer course.

Page 51: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 51

Lufthansa perspectivesQuality assurance

Elaborated Quality Assurance concept to control process and material quality (using AC145.6 as reference).Process control:

Traveler coupon implementation for each process step.Write-ups for temperature, pressure, vacuum parameters on each repair step.

Material:Purchase from approved sources only.Conformity certificate inspection.Incoming material test to confirm certificate data.Controlled and monitored storage.Traveler coupon implementation for each material used in the repair.

Page 52: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 52

Lufthansa perspectivesNon Destructive Inspection

Elaborated Quality Assurance concept to control process and material quality. (cont.)NDI

Cooperation with Industry and Research Institutes to develop a new NDI method to assess the bond-strength in the joint of composite structures.Investigation to implement existing NDI methods (shearography, lockin thermography, ultrasonic excited lockin thermography etc.) in routine maintenance for large area inspections.

shearography

lockin thermography

Page 53: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 53

Lufthansa perspectivesProcess and Facility Equipment

New Processes and Facility Equipment will be considered / introduced for future repair capabilityProcess

Cooperation with Industry and Research Institutes to develop a surface preparation method providing more reliable adhesion properties on bonded repairs on composite structures.Follow up on Selective Laser Coating Removal process.

Facility Equipment

Larger autoclave.Laser coating removal equipment.

Page 54: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 54

Integrated composite repair

design & implementation

Composite repair design(Special CAD modules)

Automatic cutting of repair plies

ND Quality controlShearography or Holography

Laser paint removal

Laser projection of repair plies on damaged part

Lufthansa perspectivesNew tools needed to optimize repair process for composites

Page 55: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 55

Conclusion

Summary:Composite parts demonstrate significant benefits and are established in commercial aircraft structures.

All composite parts will get damaged.

Durability, repairability and maintainability issues must be addressed in the design phase and repairs for frequent damages must be available at EIS.

Introduction of new a/c models with high percentage of compositeprimary structure will require mayor efforts at airline and MRO personnel training.

The composite industry has matured but isstill young.

Page 56: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 56

Questions ?

Page 57: Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe Composite Maintenance · PDF fileFAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th –11th, 2007 Page 2 Lufthansa Perspectives on Safe

FAA Damage Tolerance and Maintenance Workshop Amsterdam, May 9th – 11th, 2007Page 57

Thank you for your attention.