20
LTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 dσ eN !e 0 hX λdxdQ 2 dzdP 2 hT dφ h dφ l dφ s = P L l=1 SF l 0.2<y<0.3 0.4<y<0.5 0.7<y<0.8 Example (0.3<xb<0.36) For multidimensional binning in x/y/z/P T all energies are relevant at large P T and z (0.7>z>0.3) For charged pions need LTCC to cover multidimensional binning 1) LTCC role in separation of pions 2) Role of LTCC in validation of TOF pion ID at large momenta (2 data sets with LTCC compared ) y=ν/E

LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC performances Harut Avakian

1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19

d�

eN!e0hX�⇤

dxdQ

2dzdP

2hT d�hd�ld�s

=P

L

l=1 SFl

0.2<y<0.3 0.4<y<0.5 0.7<y<0.8

Example (0.3<xb<0.36)

For multidimensional binning in x/y/z/PT all energies are relevant at large PT and z (0.7>z>0.3)

For charged pions need LTCC to cover multidimensional binning

1)  LTCC role in separation of pions 2)  Role of LTCC in validation of TOF pion ID at large momenta

(2 data sets with LTCC compared )

y=ν/E

Page 2: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC in RGB vs RGA: old 5.8.6 vs new 6c2.1.

2 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

RGB compared with RGA for the same number of electrons

6489 (open) vs 6715 (filled) v5.8.6 6489 (open) vs 6715 (filled) 5.8.6

6489 (open) vs 6715 (filled) 6c2.1 6489 (open) vs 6715 (filled) 6c2.1

Page 3: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC in RGB vs RGA: new 6c2.1.

3 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

Small differences in e’ distributions due to proton and neutron PDFs

Page 4: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC in RGB vs RGA: new 6c2.1.

4 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

Big differences in pion counts could not be due to proton and neutron, mainly π ID

Page 5: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

Identified pions in RGB vs RGA

5 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

There are less low energy pions per electron in RGB (may be) There are significantly more high energy pions, indicating that most high energy pions are IDt as 211 (could not be)

6489 (open) vs 6715 (filled) v.5.8.6

RGB

RGA

sensitivity to timing calibration

Page 6: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC in RGB vs RGA (Epion>3 GeV)

6 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

•  Significantly more high energy pions (x3), indicating practically all high energy hadrons are IDt as 211 in RGB (LTCC not visible)

•  In older versions of rec. software (<6c2.1) ½ of LTCC missing

RGB RGB

RGA RGA

v5.8.6

Page 7: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC in RGB vs RGA (Nphe>0)

7 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

•  With requirement Nphe>1 both sets perfectly agree in counts. •  LTCC is critical to control the real fraction of pions for E>3

6489 (open) vs 6715 (filled) 5.8.6

Page 8: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC in RGB vs RGA (v.6c2.1 Epion>3 GeV)

8 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

New calibration reduces big differences in counts (still RGB higher for TOF π+)

Filled circles: RGA-proton Empty circles: RGB-deuteron

with LTCC with LTCC

no cut on Nphe no cut on Nphe

With LTCC, per electron we have more π+ and less π- in RGA-proton vs RGB-deuteron, as expected

Page 9: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC: π+ in RGB vs RGA (v.6c2.1 Epion>3 GeV)

9 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

•  The LTCC software fixed (bot sides of sectors reconstructed) •  Some inefficiency visible in the center of sectors •  Even at E>3 most hadrons identified as pions in RGB

Filled circles: RGA-All Empty circles: RGA-Nphe>0

Filled circles: RGB-All Empty circles: RGB-Nphe>0

Page 10: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

π+ RGA: LTCC Energy Dependence (v.6c2.1)

10 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

Efficiency improving with energy (holes in center)

Filled circles: RGA-All Empty circles: RGA-Nphe>0

Eπ+>3 GeV

Eπ+>5 GeV

Eπ+>4 GeV

Page 11: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC: π- in RGB vs RGA (v.6c2.1 Epion>3 GeV)

11 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

Similar to π+, with holes in the center less visible

Filled circles: RGA-All Empty circles: RGA-Nphe>0

Filled circles: RGB-All Empty circles: RGB-Nphe>0

Page 12: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

π- RGA: LTCC Energy Dependence (v.6c2.1)

12 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

Efficiency improving with energy

Filled circles: RGA-All Eπ->3 GeV Empty circles: RGA-Nphe>0 Filled circles: RGA-All Eπ->4 GeV

Empty circles: RGA-Nphe>0

Page 13: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC in RGB vs RGA: Kaons

13 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

•  More Kaons in the RGA at small angles and high energies. •  With improved calibration (to be checked with RICH) TOF ID should get

more reliable •  At high energies fraction of Kaons is high, and LTCC signal may be useful

for pion/Kaon separation (to be cross checked with RICH)

Page 14: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC in RGB vs RGA (v.6c2.1 Epion>3 GeV)

14 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

•  Part of the nucleon peaks RGB/RGA may improve with better PID for pions •  Need more statistics with LTCC signal to check the reduction of the background •  Exclusive epπ+π- can be used to monitor efficiencies (PID,rec.eff.) and resolutions

Filled circles: RGA-proton Empty circles: RGB-deuteron

Page 15: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC response vs time

start 10.2 (6409) current

50nA

RGA-Spring 2019 RGB-Spring 2019

Page 16: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC response MC v.6b2.0

CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 16

In MC practically all pions with E>3 have response in LTCC More detailed comparison between MC and data needed

Page 17: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

SUMMARY

CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 17

The latest coatjava (>=v.6c.2.1) has proper LTCC reconstruction LTCC plays a crucial role in pion ID at energies > 3 GeV LTCC can provide a clean sample of pions a)  can be used in analysis b)  check the quality of TOF pion ID at high energies, where the

TOF ID becomes very sensitive to timing calibrations

•  Need further improvement of LTCC calibrations (V.Mascagna, M. Ungaro)

•  Improved description in gemc and reconstruction (S. Joosten)

Page 18: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

Support slides

CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 18

Page 19: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

Comparing MC and data (6715) v.6b2.0

CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 19

Page 20: LTCC performances Harut AvakianLTCC performances Harut Avakian 1 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17 JLab, CLAS Collaboration meeting, June 19 deN !e 0 hX

LTCC performances

20 CLAS12 Coll. M, June 17

Comparing the same number of electrons RGA-6715 (filled) vs RGB 6489 (empty)

In fiducial region good agreement in electron counts for momentum and angles