32
LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

LFPs 1: Spectral analysis

Kenneth D. Harris11/2/15

Page 2: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Local field potentials

• Slow component of intracranial electrical signal • Physical basis for scalp EEG

Page 3: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15
Page 4: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Today we will talk about

• Physical basis of the LFP

• Current-source density analysis

• Some math (signal processing theory, Gaussian processes)

• Spectral analysis

Page 5: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Physical basis of the LFP signal

Synaptic input

• Kirchoff’s current law:• Current flowing into any location balances

current flowing out of it.

• Extracellular space is resistive

• Ohm’s law applied to return current:

• Assumes uniformity across x and y

Intracellular current

Charging current (capacitive)plus leak current (resistive)

Return current

Page 6: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Linear probe recordings• Record , spacing

• Extracellular current

• Intracellular current

• Current source density (CSD)

Page 7: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Spatial interpolation• To make nicer figures, interpolate before

taking second derivative.

• Which interpolation method?• Linear?• Quadratic?

• Cubic spline method fits 3rd-order polynomials between each “knot”, 1st and 2nd derivative continuous at knots.

Page 8: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Current source density

• Laminar LFP recorded in V1

• Triggered average on spikes of simultaneously recorded thalamic neuron

• Getting the sign right• Remember current flows from V+

to V–• Local minimum of V(z) = Current

sink =second derivative positive Jin et al, Nature Neurosci 2011

Page 9: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Current source density: potential problems• Assumption of (x,y) homogeneity

• Gain mismatch• The CSD is orders of magnitude smaller than the raw voltage• If the gain of channels are not precisely equal, raw signal bleeds through

• Sink does not always mean synaptic input• Could be active conductance

• Can’t distinguish sink coming on from source going off• Because LFP data is almost always high-pass filtered in hardware

• Plot the current too! (i.e. 1st derivative). This is easier to interpret, and less susceptible to artefacts.

Page 10: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Signal processing theory

Page 11: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Typical electrophysiology recording system

• Filter has two components • High-pass (usually around 1Hz). Without this, A/D converter would saturate• Low-pass (anti-aliasing filter, half the sample rate).

Amplifier Filter A/D converter

Page 12: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Sampling theorem

• Nyquist frequency is half the sampling rate

• If a signal has no power above the Nyquist frequency, the whole continuous signal can be reconstructed uniquely from the samples

• If there is power above the Nyquist frequency, you have aliasing

Page 13: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Power spectrum and Fourier transform• They are not the same!

• Power spectrum estimates how much energy a signal has at each frequency.

• You use the Fourier transform to estimate the power spectrum.

• But the raw Fourier transform is a bad estimate.

• Fourier transform is deterministic, a way of re-representing a signal

• Power spectrum is a statistical estimator used when you have limited data

Page 14: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Discrete Fourier transform

• Represents a signal as a sum of sine/cosine waves

• is real, but is complex. • Magnitude of is wave amplitude• Argument of is phase• Still only degrees of freedom: .

Page 15: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Using the Fourier transform to estimate power• Noisy!

Page 16: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Power spectra are statistical estimates• Recorded signal is just one of many that could have been observed in the

same experiment

• We want to learn something about the population this signal came from

• Fourier transform is a faithful representation of this particular recording

• Not what we want

Page 17: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Continuous processes

• A continuous process defines a probability distribution over the space of possible signals

Sample space =all possible LFP signals

Probability density 0.000343534976

Page 18: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Stationary Gaussian process

• Time series

• Multivariate Gaussian distribution:

• Stationary Gaussian process• . • is autocovariance function• is a constant, usually 0.

Page 19: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Autocovariance

• Autocovariance

• It is a 2nd order statistic of

Page 20: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Power spectrum estimation error

• Power spectrum is Fourier transform of • Also a second order statistic

• For a Gaussian process, is proportional to a distribution.• Std Dev = Mean, however much data you have

• That’s why estimating power spectrum as is so noisy

Page 21: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Power spectrum estimation

• Need to average to reduce estimation error

• If you observe multiple instantiations of the data, average over them• E.g. multiple trials

Page 22: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Tapering

• Fourier transform assumes a periodic signal

• Periodic signal is discontinuous => too much high-frequency power

Page 23: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Welch’s method

• Average the squared FFT over multiple windows

• Simplest method, use when you have a long signal

Page 24: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Welch’s method results (100 windows)

Page 25: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Averaging in time and frequency

• Shorter windows => more windows • Less noisy• Less frequency resolution

• Averaging over multiple windows is equivalent to averaging over neighboring frequencies

Page 26: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Multi-taper method

• Only one window, but average over different taper shapes• Use when you have short signals• Taper shapes chosen to have fixed

bandwidth

Page 27: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Multitaper method (1 window)

Page 28: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

http://www.chronux.org/

Page 29: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Hippocampus LFP power spectra

• Typical “1/f” shape

• Oscillations seen as modulations around this

• Usually small, broad peaks

CA1 pyramidal layerBuzsaki et al, Neuroscience 2003

Page 30: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Connexin-36 knockout

Buhl et al, J Neurosci 2003

Page 31: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Stimulus changes power spectrum in V1

• High-frequency broadband power usually correlates with firing rate• Is this a gamma oscillation?

Henrie and Shapley J Neurophys 2005

Page 32: LFPs 1: Spectral analysis Kenneth D. Harris 11/2/15

Attention changes power spectrum in V1

Chalk et al, Neuron 2010