Upload
anonymous-alqxb11egq
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/23/2019 Let's Talk Base Stock
1/2
When a maintenance technician finishes adding a charge of oil
to a critical hydraulic system, (s)he is not likely thinking about
the oil's individual components. Rather, his/her thoughts might
focus on how the oil will perform in the system. Will it lubricate
adequately? Will it cause deposits to form in the system? Will it
help keep contaminants from causing equipment damage and
filter plugging? Will it keep my equipment running smoothly
until my next scheduled maintenance interval?
If performance is what really matters, then why would anyone
spend time talking about formulation components? That's a
good question, but the practical reality is that there is a lot
of questions, concerns, and in some cases misinformation,
about the use of API Group I and Group II base stocks in
hydraulic oil formulations.
Base Stock Basics
Figure 1 shows the American Petroleum Institute (API)
categories for base stocks. These categories are based on
a few chemical and physical properties of the base stock.
Each property can be attributed to certain natural features ofbase oils. VI, viscosity index, is important when considering
applications exposed to temperature extremes. Sulfur provides
natural anti-wear protection. Saturates content, or chemical
composition purity, relates to oxidation stability and seal
compatibility. Not shown in Figure 1, but equally important,
is aromatic content. Aromatics, which are removed to
achieve higher saturates content, are the chemical
constituents important when considering a base stock's
natural solvency. Looking at Group I and Group II base
stocks only, Figure 2 shows which base stock naturally
exhibits the strongest features.
Group I vs Group II - Affect on Hydraulic OilsLow Temperature Capability
The low temperature properties of mineral oils are mostly
dependent on the dewaxing process used to finish the oils.
Although different dewaxing processes are usually used for
Group I and Group II oils, both can be formulated easily to meet
the low-temperature needs of most hydraulic applications.
Wear Protection
A key performance requirement for hydraulic systems is good
wear protection.Although Group I oils have an inherent level of
wear protection due to sulfur containing molecules in the oil
API Base Stock ClassificationPhysical Specifications
Group VI Sulfur
Wt. %
Saturate
Wt. %
ManufacturingProcess
I 80- 12 0 > 0.03 90
III >120 90
IV 14 0
typ
0.00
typ
>90 typ
V
Figure 1
Conventional
(Solvent Refining)
RequiresHydrocracking/Dewax
Requires Severe
Hydrocracking/Dewax
Chemical Synthesis
PAO
All other types-ester, polyglycols,phosphate esters...
Let's Talk Base Stock
Group I versus group II in hydraulic applications
Figure 2
Low Temperature Capability
Parameter
Comparison of base StockProperties
Group I Group II
Natural Wear Protection
Oxidation Stability (with AO)
Seal Compatibility
Additive Solvency
Contaminant/DepositSolvency
(removed from Group II), good anti-wear additives are available
which give most new hydraulic oils adequate wear protection
for today's demanding applications. As shown in Figure 3, wear
metals only accounted for 5% of used oil alerts for ExxonMobil
oils. However, an important question is how long will an oil
maintain its wear protection in use? For oils such as Mobil DTE
20 and Mobil DTE Excel, which have exceptional contamination
control and keep clean performance - leading to longer service
life, being able to maintain the anti-wear performance for
extended periods of time is a necessity and a key performance
advantage of these hydraulic oils. Most competitive products,
7/23/2019 Let's Talk Base Stock
2/2
whether formulated with Group I or Group II base oils, may not
require the extended wear protection since they will likely be
removed from service sooner due to a lack of contamination
control and keep clean (system cleanliness) performance.
Oxidation Stability
Although Group II oils are more oxidatively stable than Group I,
this difference only becomes significant at higher temperatures.
For instance, the ASTM D943 oxidation test, run at 95C
(203F), tends to give better results for Group II oils than Group I
(see Tech Topic "Burnt TOST" for discussion on relevance of
D943 to hydraulic oils). However, most hydraulic systems run
much lower in temperature, typically in the range 50-60C
(122-140F). In fact, based on nearly 50,000 ExxonMobil used
hydraulic oil samples, which upon testing generated alerts
identifying them to be either borderline or unsuited for further
service, only 2.5% were related to oxidation (Figure 3). None
of the alerts were due to oxidation alone.The bottom line is that,
in terms of practical benefits, the oxidation stability of Group I
versus Group II base oils is irrelevant for the vast majority of
hydraulic system operating conditions.
Solvency
The aromatics in Group I base oils give them excellent solvency
properties. This natural solvency and the right mix of performance
additives help to keep degradation and contamination products
from forming varnishes and deposits in operation.This is
especially important for modern systems with tight tolerances.
This natural solvency is removed from Group II oils to gain
better oxidation stability. Additional components can be added
to improve the solvency of Group II base oils. However, the
added expense often precludes this approach for hydraulic
oils. Between better oxidation stability or better solvency
(referring to Figure 3), where would you choose to have thebalance lie for your hydraulic fluid?
Seal Compatibility
Most people who have worked around hydraulic equipment
have seen the mess created when a system leaks oil (Figure 4).
This can occur in any part of the system, such as seals and
hoses, where elastomers are used. Since the hydraulic oilscome into direct contact with the seals and hoses, it is important
to understand any interactions that may occur between them. In
general, elastomer seals rely on the oil to swell them to create a
better seal with the equipment. Aromatic compounds in oil tend
to transfer into many common elastomer materials better than
saturated hydrocarbons. Therefore, in these cases, hydraulic oils
which use Group I oils tend to swell seals more than those which
use Group II oils. Similar to solvency, additional components can
be added to increase the seal swell with Group II oils. However,
the additional expense often precludes this approach for
hydraulic oils. Figure 5 shows ISO 1817 elastomer swell data
for two identical hydraulic oil formulations which differ only by
the base oil (Group I vs Group II).The test was run at the
standard test temperature of 100C and the test was extended
past the normal one week duration to nine weeks.The figure
shows that the Group I based formulation showed consistently
higher elastomer swelling over the entire extended test period.
Conclusion
Hydraulic oils can be successfully formulated with either Group I
or Group II base oils. Group I oils have the advantages of higher
natural solvency, which can improve contamination/deposit
control and additive solvency; natural wear protection; and
enhanced elastomer compatibility, which can help reduce
system leaks. Group II oils have a higher oxidation stability
and lower volatility, but neither of these attributes translates
into improved performance in typical hydraulic systems.
2005 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved.
MOBIL, the MOBIL Logo (with red O), the flying horse device, EXXONMOBIL, and theExxonMobil Logotype are trademarks of Exxon Mobil Corporation or one of its subsidiaries.Mobil DTE and other brands are trademarks and brand names of Exxon Mobil Corporation or
one of its subsidiaries.
www.mobil.com
XT-0001SH
Oxidation + Others
Contamination
Wear Metals
92.5%
2.5%5.0%
ExxonMobil Used Hydraulic Oil Alerts
Figure 3
Based on 12 Years of Used Hydraulic Oil Data(49,389 Data Points)
Figure 4NBR Seal Swell
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9
Group I Based Hydraulic Oil
Group II Based Hydraulic Oil
Figure 5