Let's Talk Base Stock

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 Let's Talk Base Stock

    1/2

    When a maintenance technician finishes adding a charge of oil

    to a critical hydraulic system, (s)he is not likely thinking about

    the oil's individual components. Rather, his/her thoughts might

    focus on how the oil will perform in the system. Will it lubricate

    adequately? Will it cause deposits to form in the system? Will it

    help keep contaminants from causing equipment damage and

    filter plugging? Will it keep my equipment running smoothly

    until my next scheduled maintenance interval?

    If performance is what really matters, then why would anyone

    spend time talking about formulation components? That's a

    good question, but the practical reality is that there is a lot

    of questions, concerns, and in some cases misinformation,

    about the use of API Group I and Group II base stocks in

    hydraulic oil formulations.

    Base Stock Basics

    Figure 1 shows the American Petroleum Institute (API)

    categories for base stocks. These categories are based on

    a few chemical and physical properties of the base stock.

    Each property can be attributed to certain natural features ofbase oils. VI, viscosity index, is important when considering

    applications exposed to temperature extremes. Sulfur provides

    natural anti-wear protection. Saturates content, or chemical

    composition purity, relates to oxidation stability and seal

    compatibility. Not shown in Figure 1, but equally important,

    is aromatic content. Aromatics, which are removed to

    achieve higher saturates content, are the chemical

    constituents important when considering a base stock's

    natural solvency. Looking at Group I and Group II base

    stocks only, Figure 2 shows which base stock naturally

    exhibits the strongest features.

    Group I vs Group II - Affect on Hydraulic OilsLow Temperature Capability

    The low temperature properties of mineral oils are mostly

    dependent on the dewaxing process used to finish the oils.

    Although different dewaxing processes are usually used for

    Group I and Group II oils, both can be formulated easily to meet

    the low-temperature needs of most hydraulic applications.

    Wear Protection

    A key performance requirement for hydraulic systems is good

    wear protection.Although Group I oils have an inherent level of

    wear protection due to sulfur containing molecules in the oil

    API Base Stock ClassificationPhysical Specifications

    Group VI Sulfur

    Wt. %

    Saturate

    Wt. %

    ManufacturingProcess

    I 80- 12 0 > 0.03 90

    III >120 90

    IV 14 0

    typ

    0.00

    typ

    >90 typ

    V

    Figure 1

    Conventional

    (Solvent Refining)

    RequiresHydrocracking/Dewax

    Requires Severe

    Hydrocracking/Dewax

    Chemical Synthesis

    PAO

    All other types-ester, polyglycols,phosphate esters...

    Let's Talk Base Stock

    Group I versus group II in hydraulic applications

    Figure 2

    Low Temperature Capability

    Parameter

    Comparison of base StockProperties

    Group I Group II

    Natural Wear Protection

    Oxidation Stability (with AO)

    Seal Compatibility

    Additive Solvency

    Contaminant/DepositSolvency

    (removed from Group II), good anti-wear additives are available

    which give most new hydraulic oils adequate wear protection

    for today's demanding applications. As shown in Figure 3, wear

    metals only accounted for 5% of used oil alerts for ExxonMobil

    oils. However, an important question is how long will an oil

    maintain its wear protection in use? For oils such as Mobil DTE

    20 and Mobil DTE Excel, which have exceptional contamination

    control and keep clean performance - leading to longer service

    life, being able to maintain the anti-wear performance for

    extended periods of time is a necessity and a key performance

    advantage of these hydraulic oils. Most competitive products,

  • 7/23/2019 Let's Talk Base Stock

    2/2

    whether formulated with Group I or Group II base oils, may not

    require the extended wear protection since they will likely be

    removed from service sooner due to a lack of contamination

    control and keep clean (system cleanliness) performance.

    Oxidation Stability

    Although Group II oils are more oxidatively stable than Group I,

    this difference only becomes significant at higher temperatures.

    For instance, the ASTM D943 oxidation test, run at 95C

    (203F), tends to give better results for Group II oils than Group I

    (see Tech Topic "Burnt TOST" for discussion on relevance of

    D943 to hydraulic oils). However, most hydraulic systems run

    much lower in temperature, typically in the range 50-60C

    (122-140F). In fact, based on nearly 50,000 ExxonMobil used

    hydraulic oil samples, which upon testing generated alerts

    identifying them to be either borderline or unsuited for further

    service, only 2.5% were related to oxidation (Figure 3). None

    of the alerts were due to oxidation alone.The bottom line is that,

    in terms of practical benefits, the oxidation stability of Group I

    versus Group II base oils is irrelevant for the vast majority of

    hydraulic system operating conditions.

    Solvency

    The aromatics in Group I base oils give them excellent solvency

    properties. This natural solvency and the right mix of performance

    additives help to keep degradation and contamination products

    from forming varnishes and deposits in operation.This is

    especially important for modern systems with tight tolerances.

    This natural solvency is removed from Group II oils to gain

    better oxidation stability. Additional components can be added

    to improve the solvency of Group II base oils. However, the

    added expense often precludes this approach for hydraulic

    oils. Between better oxidation stability or better solvency

    (referring to Figure 3), where would you choose to have thebalance lie for your hydraulic fluid?

    Seal Compatibility

    Most people who have worked around hydraulic equipment

    have seen the mess created when a system leaks oil (Figure 4).

    This can occur in any part of the system, such as seals and

    hoses, where elastomers are used. Since the hydraulic oilscome into direct contact with the seals and hoses, it is important

    to understand any interactions that may occur between them. In

    general, elastomer seals rely on the oil to swell them to create a

    better seal with the equipment. Aromatic compounds in oil tend

    to transfer into many common elastomer materials better than

    saturated hydrocarbons. Therefore, in these cases, hydraulic oils

    which use Group I oils tend to swell seals more than those which

    use Group II oils. Similar to solvency, additional components can

    be added to increase the seal swell with Group II oils. However,

    the additional expense often precludes this approach for

    hydraulic oils. Figure 5 shows ISO 1817 elastomer swell data

    for two identical hydraulic oil formulations which differ only by

    the base oil (Group I vs Group II).The test was run at the

    standard test temperature of 100C and the test was extended

    past the normal one week duration to nine weeks.The figure

    shows that the Group I based formulation showed consistently

    higher elastomer swelling over the entire extended test period.

    Conclusion

    Hydraulic oils can be successfully formulated with either Group I

    or Group II base oils. Group I oils have the advantages of higher

    natural solvency, which can improve contamination/deposit

    control and additive solvency; natural wear protection; and

    enhanced elastomer compatibility, which can help reduce

    system leaks. Group II oils have a higher oxidation stability

    and lower volatility, but neither of these attributes translates

    into improved performance in typical hydraulic systems.

    2005 Exxon Mobil Corporation. All rights reserved.

    MOBIL, the MOBIL Logo (with red O), the flying horse device, EXXONMOBIL, and theExxonMobil Logotype are trademarks of Exxon Mobil Corporation or one of its subsidiaries.Mobil DTE and other brands are trademarks and brand names of Exxon Mobil Corporation or

    one of its subsidiaries.

    www.mobil.com

    XT-0001SH

    Oxidation + Others

    Contamination

    Wear Metals

    92.5%

    2.5%5.0%

    ExxonMobil Used Hydraulic Oil Alerts

    Figure 3

    Based on 12 Years of Used Hydraulic Oil Data(49,389 Data Points)

    Figure 4NBR Seal Swell

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8 Week 9

    Group I Based Hydraulic Oil

    Group II Based Hydraulic Oil

    Figure 5