25
Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure, Transparency, Training

Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure, Transparency, Training

Page 2: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

C H R I S T I E S H E L T O N , P R O V O S T

M A U R E E N N E W T O N , D E A N , H U M A N S E R V I C E S & S O C I A L S C I E N C E S

S T A C I S T O N E , D E A N , A R T S & H U M A N I T I E S

J E N N I F E R F O S T E R , D I R E C T O R , F A C U L T Y C O M M O N S

Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure, Transparency, Training

Page 3: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Overview

� Context

� Review, Revision, Approvals

� Portfolio Process Reimagined

� Professional Development

� Best Practices

Page 4: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

SACS-COC Standards

� 6.3: The institution publishes and implements policies regarding the appointment, employment, and regular evaluation of faculty members, regardless of contract or tenure status. (Faculty appointment and evaluation)

� 6.5: The institution provides ongoing professional development opportunities for faculty members as teachers, scholars, and practitioners, consistent with the institutional mission. (Faculty development)

Page 5: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

The Leap

Radio City Rockettes: 6 Tips for Great Dance Leaps

1. Preparation—need solid preparation; build momentum, but don’t use up all energy here. Don’t lean forward or height will be reduced.

Page 6: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Preparation = Context

� Institutional Context

� Mission

� Catalyst for Revision

� Inconsistency in Portfolios

� Confusion regarding Expectations

Page 7: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Preparation = Context

� Objectives

� Clarify guidelines� Expand definitions of teaching, scholarship� Align expectations with revised mission (community

engagement)� Allow application across diverse disciplines

Page 8: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

The Leap

� Radio City Rockettes: � 6 Tips for Great Dance Leaps

� 2. Power—actions in this step include “launch,” “start,” “force,” “press,” and “achieve.”

� In academia, strong “power” lies in shared governance.

Page 9: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Power = Stakeholders

� Leading charge: Deans’ Council

� Other parties: ÷ Faculty Senate÷ Department Heads’ Council÷ Deans’ Council÷ Provost÷ President

Page 10: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

The Leap

� Radio City Rockettes: � 6 Tips for Great Dance Leaps

� 3. Timing—takes working simultaneously, engaging quickly, and being aware.

Page 11: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Timing = Implementation

� 18-month process

� Partial roll-out in month 6 (faculty with choice of portfolio version)

� Approvals

Page 12: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

The Leap

� Radio City Rockettes: � 6 Tips for Great Dance Leaps

� 4. Energy—“Dancers adjust their energy flow to create these subtle differences in their leaps.” Breathing is important.

Page 13: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Energy = Challenges

Consistent definitions

Expectation of concrete/quantifiable guide

Research-based approach (Boyer)

Redefinition of community engagement

Page 14: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Challenges

Consistent definitions

Examples

Quality Teaching

Collegiality

Page 15: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Challenges

Expectation of concrete/quantifiable guide

Examples

Limiting definitions

Desire for a number

Page 16: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Challenges

Research-based approach (Boyer)

Example

Scholarly credit for program proposals/accreditation

Peer Review

Page 17: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Challenges

Redefinition of community engagement

Example

Connection to discipline, as defined by discipline

Page 18: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Challenges

Multiple revisions of Faculty Handbook

Examples

Inclusive language (creative activity)

Consistent references (instructor/lecturer)

Page 19: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

The Leap

� Radio City Rockettes � 6 Tips for Great Dance Leaps

� 5. Shape—what is trying to be achieved in the air. The dancer should be able to make that shape on the ground.

Page 20: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Shape = Reimagined Portfolio

� (Shape of the T&P Application)� Portfolio Guidelines

� Created New Document� Improved Transparency� Tested Guidelines� Gathered Feedback� Revised Guidelines

Page 21: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

The Leap

� Radio City Rockettes� 6 Tips for Great Dance Leaps

� 6. Control—Even with everything else, leap will not be achieved without keeping it all under control. “Control doesn’t come from tensing your muscles.” Good alignment and engagement are essential.

Page 22: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Control = Quality

� Professional Development

� Transparency—All Deans Presented� Experienced Faculty Presenters� Tiered Training by Rank� Access to Model Portfolios� Archived Workshops� Incentivized Faculty Participation

Page 23: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Take a Leap

� Best Practices

� Recommendations

Page 24: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Questions

Page 25: Leaping into Faculty Evaluation: Promotion, Tenure

Works Cited

� Boyer, Ernest L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Jossey-Bass, 1997.

� The Radio City Rockettes. “6 Tips for Great Dance Leaps.” https://www.rockettes.com/blog/6-tips-for-great-dance-leaps/

� Southern Association of Colleges and SchoolsCommission on Colleges. Principles of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancement. 2018 edition.