1

12 May 2014 AWLC2014@Fermilab LCB Chair The University of Tokyo Sachio Komamiya

LCB

5 members X 3 regions + chair = 16 members + secretary

Members:

Chair Sachio Komamiya (The University of Tokyo)

Americas Jonathan Bagger (TRIUMF)

Nigel Lockyer (Fermilab Director)

David MacFarlane (SLAC)

Lia Merminga (TRIUMF)

Hugh Montgomery (Jefferson Lab)

Asia Jie Gao (IHEP, Beijing)

Rohini Godbole (Indian Institute of Science)

Sunkee Kim (RISP)

Atsuto Suzuki (KEK Director)

Yifang Wang (IHEP Director)

Europe Rolf Heuer (CERN Director-General)

Joachim Mnich (DESY Director of Particle Physics)

Francois Le Diberder (IN2P3)

Victor Mateev (JINR Director)

Lenny Rivkin (PSI)

Secretary Roy Rubinstein

3

→LCB

→LCC

CLIC

We are enduring the pains of childbirth to launch the project

We need to see more clear vision towards the construction

2014

EDR

P5 Report

Road Map

4

Common strategy on ILC from the three regions

European Strategy on HEP

Asian Statement on ILC

Snowmass process ⇒ P5 recommendation

May 22-23

HEPAP meeting

After the Higgs discovery

CLIC and ILC are not competitive projects

5

LCB Launching the project

Now, launching the project has the highest priority.

~approval of the international project by governments

We need to believe that we can launch the project.

We need vision and hard work to materialize our belief.

The consistent picture of the project has to be jointly

owned.

The roadmap should be stable but should be evolved.

Big milestones have to be set up and reached.

6

LCB How we start the international negotiations ?

ILC should be a truly international project.

Japanese government is worrying that,

once Japan agrees to be a host, then most of the budget must be covered by Japan.

Hard negotiations must be started as soon as possible.

Before starting the negotiations, informal contacts between high level officers of the

major stakeholders must be done. Actually, these have been already started.

The next step is that the scientists (LCC) make possible combinations of packages out

of the subsystems and components.

The ILC is suited for in-kind procurement. For example, the main linac SCRF system

can be divided into several pieces. Accelerator physicists experienced on procurement

must work out in this process.

Then the big negotiations must be done with ILC items packaged with political items

between governments.

7

LCB Very Important Issues in launching the project

(1) Definition of the Project with Physics Objectives

Time line of the whole project

Staging strategy

Energy upgrade plan

(2) Construction cost refinement (based on the TDR)

Operation cost

(3) Human resources estimation (physicists, engineers,

technicians) Construction, installation, and operation

stages

Efforts for cost and labor reduction have to be

continued.

8

LCB Clean up issues pointed out by the Science

Council of Japan (SCJ)

SCJ Recommendation

9

SCJ Recommendation

10

LCB Big science issues of ILC physics

Higgs Boson is a window of the new physics. But ILC physics is

not only the precise measurement of the Higgs Boson properties.

Find the direction towards beyond the Standard Model:

Full elucidation of the Higgs Boson

Physics of the Grand Unification Scale

SUSY and SUSY breaking

Inflation and phase transition of the universe

Physics of space-time and vacuum

Vacuum stability

Missing of the gravity interaction in the Standard Model and

Physics at the Planck scale

Quantum gravity Superstring ?

11

SCJ Recommendation

Decision must be done by the Government and not SCJ

12

Common7%

ElectronSource3%

PositronSource4%

DampingRings6%

RTML8%

MainLinac66%

BDS4%

IR2%

CFS-Civilconstruction 10%

CFS-other 6%

L-bandCavitiesandCryomodules 32%

L-bandHLRF 9%

Cryogenics 7%

Controls 2%

TOTALMainLinac 66%

By accelerator

system

CFS-Civilconstruc on

18%

CFS-other11%

L-bandCavi esand

Cryomodules35%

L-bandHLRF10%

Cryogenics8%

Installa on1%

MagnetsandPowerSupplies

6%

ControlsandCompu ng

Infrastructrure6%

Instrumenta on1%

DumpsandCollimators

1%

Vacuum1%

NonL-bandRF1%

Areasystemspecific

1%

Close Inspections of the Cost and Labor

Estimations in TDR assuming the host by LCC

13

LCB activities after LCWS13

(1) Subcommittees of LCB

1) ILC Lab. governance and management structure

2) Roadmap towards the international agreement

(2) PAC

(3) MoU for the LCC

(4) To further activate the LCB, telephone

meetings are planned every month.

14

Brian Foster Oxford University / DESY

Satoru Yamashita ICEPP, the University of Tokyo

Dean Karlen University of Victoria

D. K. Srivastava Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, Kolkata

Colin Carlile. ESS in Sweden

Jonathan Dorfan and Neil Calder OIST

Vera Luth SLAC

Exofficio Sachio Komamiya (LCB), Lyn Evans (LCC)

The first fuze meeting was held on 25/3/2014. The first face-to-

face meeting will be at the Fermilab AWLC. Most of the

meetings can be remote.

LCB set up two Subcommittees

１) Subcommittee to study and produce recommendation of the

structure of the ILC Lab （Governance, Project Management etc.）

Members are selected by Laboratory directors or ‘vice directors’

CERN, DESY, IHEP, KEK, SLAC, Fermilab

15

LCB Subcommittee on ILC Laboratory Organization and Management

Mandate

The Subcommittee is to produce recommendations on the organization and

management of the proposed ILC Lab in Japan. Among the items to consider for this

global project are: governance; organization; management structure; legal framework;

staff composition; relationship between world HEP labs and the ILC Lab; and the role of

the host nation.

The subcommittee can use as a starting point the GDE Project Implementation

Planning (PIP) document

http://ilc-edmsdirect.desy.de/ilcedmsdirect/file.jsp?edmsid=D00000000979545

produced prior to the recent interest shown for an ILC site located in Japan; this study

considered many of the relevant issues. The Comprehensive Project Design Guidance

(CPDG),

http://cpdg.kek.jp *

which has a more detailed consideration of a more limited set of issues, may also be a

useful reference.

A final report should be submitted by the Subcommittee to the LCB’s 26 February 2015

meeting; an interim report can be submitted earlier if a consensus is reached on

significant issues.

16

Important matters for the final form of the LC Lab

(a) Legal framework

The framework will evolve from that based on MoU

to that on International Treaty.

（Experience of XFEL: It was not easy to reach an

agreement even for a limited-liability company.)

(b) Procurement

Although based on In-kind, significantly large

Common Fund is needed

(ITER: almost all in-kind, LHC: 80% by the Host)

(c) Staff composition

Basically seconded staffs from many labs.

It is essential to have full time core members in the

Central Team employed by the Common Fund.

(d) Organization

Director General, Directorate,

Council, User’s Committee

(e) Role of host

Short term agility and long time stability are needed for the organization

17

2) Subcommittee to propose an international agreement for the ILC project

Exchange information on political developments impacting the ILC project in order to move the project forward.

Propose arrangements to lead towards international approval of the ILC project by considering the specific circumstances in each region/country.

KEK-DG distributes updated information of the ILC project in

Japan for every month, and the discussion will be over

telephones.

Members: Laboratory directors or members of directorate

Atsuto Suzuki

Yifang Wang

Rolf Heuer

Joachim Mnich

Nigel Lockyer

Jonathan Bagger

Exofficio: LCC director Lyn Evans

18

PAC （Project Advisory Committee） The PAC will assess and / or comment (for ILC and CLIC):

• The overall physics, technical design, cost, and schedule

• The detector progress

• Civil construction and the preparatory activities

• The financial contributions and management as far as

accelerator/detector design, R&D and the site

preparation activities

•Schedule

Members are selected.

The first PAC meeting must be held within this year.

19

Chair Norbert Holtkamp

Deputy Chair Michel Davier

Accelerator and

Project

Hans Weise (DESY) Linac Construction

Robert Orr (Tronto) Cavity R&D

Mark Palmer （FNAL） Large Science Facilties

Philippe Lebrun (CERN) PM / Cost

Osamu Kamigaito (RFBF Riken) Facility construction

Moo Hyun Cho (PAL Korea) Linac Technology

Eisuke Tada (JAEA/ITER) PM / Integration

Shinichi Akutagawa

(Kobe University)

Construction Management

Norihito Ohuchi (KEK)

NOT AVAILABLE

SC-RF/ Cryomodule product.

Experiments

Joe Lykken (FNAL) Physics

Peter Jenni (CERN/ATLAS)

Detector/Physics

Tomio Kobayashi (ICEPP,Tokyo) Detector/ Experiments

Hesheng Chen (IHEP, Beijing) Detector/Experiemnts

PAC （Project Advisory Committee）

Members

LCC requested to postpone the

First meeting.

I will discuss with PAC chair and LCC

directorate on the meeting.

Within this year PAC has to have

The first meeting

20

MoU for LCC

The almost final MoU is ready

The known members to write his/her signature for the MoU

CERN DG Rolf Heuer

KEK DG Atsuto Suzuki

DESY Chair Board of the Directorium Helmut Dosch

Director of Particle and Astroparticle Physics Joachim Mnich

Nikhef Director Frank Linde

RISP Director Sunkee Kim

TRIUMF CEO/CAO Jim Hanlon

DoE cannot write signatures for multi-lateral MoU but they promised to contribute

to the Common Fund.

In addition to the above members I am asking LCB members

Russia, China, India, France, Switzerland, …, who is going to write the signature．

Countries without LCB members (UK, …) I am asking privately.

First, known members give signatures, and then extend to other members.

(The same procedure was taken for the GDE MoU)

21

22

Summary

Since three regions have the common strategy for the ILC,

now, launching the project has the highest priority.

～Approval of the international project by governments

Even if we cannot secure large budget for now for the

Engineering Designing and R&D, we need to start where we

have to: Close examination of the cost and the labor estimations

in TDR assuming the host.

Two subcommittees are set up (1) LCB Subcommittee on ILC Laboratory Organization and Management (2) Subcommittee to propose an international agreement for the ILC project (Major Lab directors)

PAC will be held within this year.