LAPORAN PEMANTAUAN KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING DAN …dms.winrip-ibrd.com/data/C1_BCENR/C1.05_SpRampa-Poriaha/C1.05.06... · LAPORAN PEMANTAUAN KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING DAN SITE VISIT

ANTI CORRUPTION ACTION PLAN (ACAP)RENCANA TINDAK ANTI KORUPSI (RTAK)

LAPORAN PEMANTAUAN KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING DAN SITE VISIT

PENGADAAN JASA PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI

Oleh:

WAKIL PENGAMAT DARI MASYARAKAT (WPM)Nama WPM : Medis Sejahtera Surbakti, ST.,MTNama Paket : 05, Simpang Rampa - PoriahaProvinsi : Sumatera Utara

A G U S T U S 2 0 1 4

Medan, 28 September 2014

Nomor : -

Lampiran : 1 Berkas

Perihal : Laporan Pemberisan Penjelasan (Aanwijzing)

Kepada Yth :

Ketua Project Management Unit (PMU) WINRIP

Direktorat Bina Program.Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga

Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum

Jl. Patimura 20, Kebayoran Baru,Jakarta Selatan

Dengan Hormat,

Sehubungan telah diadakannya Rapat Penjelasan ranggal Juli 2014 dan Kunjungan

Lapangan tanggalJUli 2014, maka bersama ini kami sampaikan Laporan pemberian

penjelasan (Aanwijzing)untuk Paket 5 Rampa-Poriaha.

Demikianlah, atas perhatian dan kerjasamanya disampaikan terimakasih.

WPM Paket 5 Rampa – Poriaha

Medis Sejahtera Surbakti, ST, MT

Tembusan disampaikan kepada Yth.

1. Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksana Jalan Nasional I Provinsi Sumatera Utara

2. Ketua Pokja SNVTPJN Wilayah I Provinsi Medan

3. Arsip

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan Konstruksi

i

DAFTAR ISI

DAFTAR ISI i

I. PENDAHULUAN 1II. DATA PAKET, PQ DAN PENGUMUMAN PELELANGAN 3III. PENGAMATAN PELAKSANAAN RAPAT PENJELASAN AWAL

DAN KUNJUNGAN LAPANGAN/PRE-BID MEETING AND SITE VISIT 5IV. PENUTUP 8

DAFTAR LAMPIRAN ii

WESTERN INDONESIA NATIONAL ROADS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (WINRIP)IBRD LOAN No. 8043-ID

RENCANA TINDAK ANTI KORUPSI (RTAK)ANTI-CORRUPTION ACTION PLAN (ACAP)

LAPORAN HASIL PENGAMATANPROSES PENGADAAN JASA KONSTRUKSI

Nama WPM : Medis Sejahtera SurbaktiNomor Paket : 05Nama Paket : Simpang Rampa - PoriahaProvinsi : Sumatera Utara

AGUSTUS 2014

KEMENTERIAN PEKERJAAN UMUMDIREKTORAT JENDERAL BINA MARGAD I R E K T O R A T B I N A P R O G R A MP R O J E C T M A N A G E M E N T U N I T ( P M U )


Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No: 8043-ID1

LAPORAN HASIL PENGAMATAN PROSES PENGADAAN JASAKONSTRUKSI

TAHAP PERTAMA

BAGIAN IPENDAHULUAN

Pemerintah Indonesia dengan Bank Dunia telah menandatangani Naskah PerjanjianPinjaman (Loan Agreemnet) untuk Western Indonesia National Roads ImprovementProject (WINRIP) IBRD Loan No. 8043-ID pada tanggal 14 Desember 2011. Loan efektif12 Maret 2012 dan akan berakhir pada tanggal 31 Desember 2017, senilai USD250 juta.Porsi sharing Loan dan GOI adalah 70:30 untuk Civil Works, dimana PemerintahIndonesia menyediakan Dana USD 100 juta, sehingga total nilai proyek adalah USD 350juta. Pinjaman tersebut akan digunakan untuk mendukung penguatan berkelanjutanSistem Jaringan Jalan Nasional di wilayah Indonesia Barat,yaitu untuk pekerjaan jalandan jembatan.

Tujuan utama proyek WINRIP adalah untuk meningkatkan status jaringan yangsebelumnya berfungsi sebagai jalan provinsi atau jalan non status agar sesuai denganstandar yang baru yaitu jalan nasional; memastikan bahwa jaringan jalan nasionaltersebut menjadi lebih lancar dan berkeamanan; dan mampu mendukung peningkatanekonomi daerah. Sesuai dengan Schedule 2 Section IC Naskah Perjanjian PinjamanWINRIP,dan Bab 11 Project Management Manual (PMM) WINRIP, PemerintahIndonesia dan Bank Dunia menyepakati pelaksanaan Anti-Corruption Action Plan(ACAP) atau Rencana Tindak Anti Korupsi (RTAK) dalam pelaksanaan proyek.Adapun tujuan RTAK adalah untuk;

1. Mengidentifikasi resiko bagi pemerintah dan langkah-langkah pencegahansehingga mencapai standard sistem kendali yang lebih baik dari yang telahdilakukan pada program-program sebelumnya.

2. Mengatasi semua resiko dalam bentuk rencana tindak yang dikendalikan olehDitjen. Bina Marga.

3. Mencapai pelaksanaan RTAK WINRIP yang sejalan dengan Pedoman BankDunia tentang Pencegahan dan Upaya Memerangi Penipuan dan Tindak Korupsipada program-program yang didanai oleh Bank Dunia.

Pelaksanaan komponen RTAK WINRIP pada dasarnya adalah dalam rangkapeningkatan transparansi dalam proses pelaksanaan proyek dengan menarik pelajarandan pengalaman dari pelaksanaan RTAK pada proyek-proyek sebelumnya agar lebihkuat dan efektif, dengan melakukan langkah-langkah pencegahan dan meningkatkannyapada pelaksanaan rencana tindak-nya. Berdasarkan pelajaran dan pengalaman padaproyek sebelumnya, maka RTAK yang akan dilakukan meliputi lima area sebagaimana



diformulasikan dalam Matrik Pemetaan Resiko Korupsi dan Rencana Tindak yaitu:

a. Meningkatkan Penyebarluasan Informasi dan Transparansib. Meningkatkan Pemantauan yang dilakukan oleh Masyarakat Madanic. Meningkatkan Mekanisme Penanganan Pengaduand. Pencegahan Kolusi serta Pemalsuan dan Resiko Penipuan, dane. Penerapan Sanksi dan Tindakan Hukum

Sedangkan ruang linkup pelaksanaan RTAK atau ACAP meliputi komponen-komponen berikut:

1. Pelibatan Wakil Pengamat dari Masyarakat (WPM) / Community RepresentativeObservers (CROs) dalam pemantauan atau pengamatan terhadap proses pelelangan /pengadaan jasa konstruksi.

2. Keterbukaan informasi kepada public / Public Disclosure.

3. Penanganan dan pengelolaan Pengaduan dari Masyarakat / Complaint HandlingMechanism System (CHS).

4. Pelibatan Pemantauan oleh Pihak Ketiga / Third Party Monitoring (TPM) dalampemantauan proses konstruksi.

WPM berperan sebagai kompone yang mewakili masyarakat madani dalam mengamati danmencermati proses pelelangan / pengadaan jasa konstruksi untuk mencegah terjadinya praktekkorupsi, kolusi, dan nepotisme, serta tindak pemalsuan dan resiko penipuan.



BAGIAN IIDATA PAKET, PQ DAN PENGUMUMAN PELELANGAN

1. DATA POKOK

No Paket : Paket 05 WINRIPNama Paket : Simpang Rampa – PoriahaLokasi Paket : Kabupaten Tapanuli TengahProvinsi : Sumatera UtaraSatuan Kerja : Satuan Kerja Pelaksanaan Jalan Wilayah II Provinsi Sumatera Utara

2. PRA-QUQLIFIKASI

2.1. Pengumuman Pra-Qualifikasi untuk paket 05 pada tanggal 16 Desember 2013. Datapeserta Pra-Qualifikasi untuk paket ini:1. PT Multi Structure2. PT Lince Romauli Raya3. PT Conbloc Infratecno4. PT Brantas Abipraya5. PT Nindya Karya (persero)6. PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama Tbk.7. PT Yasa Patria Perkasa8. PT PP (persero) Tbk.9. PT Waskita Karya (persero)10. PT Adhi Karya (persero), Tbk.11. PT Widya Sapta Colas.12. PT Hutama Karya-seneca Indonesia (JO)13. PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor14. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk.

2.2. Pengumuman No Objection Letter (NOL) Pra-Qualifikasi dari Bank Dunia pada tanggal15 Juli 2014. Peserta yang dinyatakan lulus Pra-Qualifikasi adalah:1. PT Multi Structure2. PT Brantas Abipraya3. PT Nindya Karya (persero)4. PT Yasa Patria Perkasa5. PT PP (persero) Tbk.6. PT Waskita Karya (persero)7. PT Adhi Karya (persero), Tbk.8. PT Widya Sapta Colas.9. PT Hutama Karya-seneca Indonesia (JO)10. PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor11. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk.



a. Peserta PQ yang dinyatakan tidak lulus PQ dan alasannya:1. PT Lince Romauli Raya, alasannya tidak memiliki pengalaman umum dalam

mengerjalan pekerjaan sejenis2. PT Conbloc Infratecno alasannya alasannya tidak cukup untuk memenuhi

kriteria pada aktivitas-aktivitas vital yang terdapat pada pekerjaan yang akandilakukan.

3. PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratama Tbk alasannya tidak cukup untukmemenuhi kriteria pada aktivitas-aktivitas vital yang terdapat pada pekerjaanyang akan dilakukan

b. Masa sanggah PQ selama 5 hari kalender, mulai dari tgl. 22 Juli s.d tgl. 26 Juli2014

c. Bila ada peserta yang mengajukan sanggahan dijelaskan apa sanggahanya danbagaimana penyelesaiannya. (tidak ada sanggahan)

3. PENGUMUMAN PELELANGAN

Apakah diumumkan di Koran? Ya √ TidakBila ‘Ya’ sebutkan nama Koran tersebut: ……………….., tgl. dimuat: ………………………..Apakah pengumuman di Koran tersebut lengkap dan jelas? Ya kurang lengkap.Bila “Tidak’ sebutkan alasannya …………………………………………………………….…….

Apakah diumumkan di Website? Ya TidakBila ‘Ya’ sebutkan website institusi: Kementrian PU,https://eproc.pu.go.id/public/eproc2014/semieproc/info_lelangdetail.asp?Tanggal dimuat: ……………………..Apakah pengumuman di website tersebut lengkap dan jelas? Ya kurang lengkap

Apakah informasi pelelangan diumumkan pada papan pengumuman? Ya TidakBila Ya, tuliskan lokasinya …………………………………………………………………………

Apakah ada pihak (calon peserta) yang mengalami kesulitan mendapatkan dokumenpelelangan? Ya Tidak

Jika Ya, harap menjelaskan kesulitan yang dihadapi dalam mendapatkan dokumenpelelangan, (harap menulis kasus yang terjadi/menimpa pada pihak tersebut).…………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Apakah ada pemungutan biaya diluar ketentuan yang telah ditetapkan di dalam dokumenlelang, bila ada mohon dijelaskan disini

Tidak ada (ditanyakan pada perwakilan Nindya Karya)

Apakah ada proses registrasi untuk bisa mengikuti pelelangan ini? Bila ada, harapdijelaskan disini TidakCatatan:

1. Lampirkan fotocopy iklan pelelangan melalui Koran atau Website2. Laporan Tahap pertama paling lambat 1 (satu) minggu setelah Rapat Penjelasan Awal

(Aanwijzing),

√

√

√

√



BAGIAN IIIPENGAMATAN PELAKSANAAN RAPAT PENJELASAN AWAL DAN

KUNJUNGAN LAPANGAN / PRE-BID MEETING AND SITE VISIT

1. PELAKSANAAN RAPAT PENJELASAN AWAL / PRE-BID MEETING (Aanwijzing)

Rapat Penpenjelasan Awal /Pre-Bid Meeting (aanwizjing dilaksanakan pada hari Kamis tgl.21 Agustus 2014 dibuka pada jam 10 s.d jam 12.00 bertempat di Kantor Balai Besar JalanJl. Kota Medan

Pembukaan rapat oleh Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah I.Rapat dihadiri unsur-unsur instansi terkait yaitu:1. Dit. Bina Pelaksanaan Wilayah : Agusta Sinulingga ( Kasubdis Sistem Pengendalian

Wilayah I)2. Satker PJN Wilayah Siduhuaro Dachi (Satker PPK 12 Sibolga)3. CTC WINRIP Sanjev (posisinya)

Edi4. WPM Medis Surbakti

Rekanan atau calon peserta lelang yang hadir pada rapat Aanwijzing tersebut:(tulis nama perusahaan dan alamat domisilinya)1. PT Multi Structure2. PT Brantas Abipraya3. PT Nindya Karya (persero)4. PT Yasa Patria Perkasa5. PT PP (persero) Tbk.6. PT Waskita Karya (persero)7. PT Adhi Karya (persero), Tbk.8. PT Widya Sapta Colas.9. PT Hutama Karya-seneca Indonesia (JO)10. PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor11. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk.

Tuliskan ringkasan penjelasan/arahan yang disampaikan oleh:1. Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional (BBPJN)/Unit Layanan Pengadaan

(ULP).Menjelaskan bahwa paket ini dibiayayai sebagian oleh WB.Jika menawar kurang dari 80% akan dilakukan perhitungan yang lebih ketat terhadapdokumen

2. Ketua Pokja Pengadaan tentang: Ringkasan data paket-paket yang akan ditenderkan

Nomor dan nama paket



Panjang efektif 9.7 km, titik awal berada 9 mk dari simpang poriaha dan titikakhir proyek di Rampah (Simpang jalan Sibolga-Barus).

Jenis pekerjaan meliputi peningkatan dan pelebaran badan jalan, drainase,pekerjaan jembatan . Kondisi existing berupa jalan tanah selebar6meter dan rencana

peningkatannya.menjadi jalan nasional dengan lebar 6 meter ditambah bahu1,5 meter,dengan penambahan 5 jembatan.

Nilai Owner Estimate (HPS) sebesar 145.815.316.000.- Durasi pelaksanaan 540 hari kalender

Tata cara dan persyaratan mengikuti pelelangan. Jaminan Penawaran sebesar 3.600.000.000,- Pemasukan Penawaran pada Tanggal 22 September 2014 (30 hari kalender) Hal-hal yang menggugurkan penawaran Format guarantee bank yang tidak boleh diubah kalimatnya Batas waktu pertanyaan terhadap dokumen adalah 2 minggu sebelum pemasukan Audit keuangan terakhir tahun 2013 harus diikutsertakan (CTC WINRIP) Hitungan financial resources untuk memenuhi kreteria (CTC WINRIP) Pemasukan penawaran sistem 2 amplop Surat sukungan bank harus dapat di realisasikan sebelum penandatanganan

kontrak Rincian Mobilisasi dianggap tidak ada

Tuliskan ringkasan tanya jawab pada rapat penjelasan/aanwizjing:PT Adhi Karyaberkenaan dengan lama waktu jaminan pelaksanaan serta apakah material on site akandibayar:Jawab : Jaminan Pelaksanaan sampai pada PHO: materialon site yang dibayar terdapatpada 14.5 (c) .i

PT PPUntuk material on site berapa besaran yang akan dibayarJawab : 100% harga satuan material

PT PPUntuk gaian apakah disposal area disediakan ?Jawab : (PPK)Ada, sejauh 3 km

PT PPLokasi proyek apa sudah bebas ?Jawab: sudah dibebaskan, tadinya jalan kabupaten



3. Rapt ditutup pada jam 12.15 dengan makan siang bersama

Catatan Khusus/Tambahan:Berdasarkan hasil pengamatan Saudara, apakah ada catatan khusus/tambahan? Tuliskan(jika ada):

Tidak ada



BAGIAN IVPENUTUP

1. KESIMPULAN

Acara yang dihadiri oleh WPM pada Aanwijzing, memberikan kesan bahwa acara tersebutberjalan dengan baik dan lancer.Tidakterdapat protes dari peserta acara tersebut, sertatidak ada pertanyaan yang tidak bisa dijawab baikoleh POKJA, Satker,PMU WINRIPataupun CTC WINRIP.

.

2. CATATAN DAN SARAN

Minutes of meeting sebaiknya langsung diselesaikan pada hari itu juga.



DAFTAR LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1. Surat Persetujuan atau No Objection Letter (NOL) PQ dari Bank Dunia.

Lampiran 2. Surat Pengumuman Hasil PQ dan Berita Acara Sanggah (Bila ada)

Lampiran 3. Pengumuman Undangan Lelang

Lampiran 4. Surat Undangan Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 5. Berita Acara Aanwijzing / Minutes of Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 6. Absensi kehadiran pada kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting dan Absensi kehadiranpada kegitan Kunjungan Lapangan / Site Visit.

Lampiran 7. Foto dokumentasi kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting dan kegiatan Site Visit

ii


DAFTAR LAMPIRANLampiran 1. Surat Persetujuan atau No Objection Letter (NOL) PQ dari Bank Dunia

Lampiran 2. Surat Pengumuman Hasil PQ dan Berita Acara Sanggah (Bila Ada)

Lampiran 3. Pengumuman Undangan Lelang

Lampiran 4. Surat Undangan Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 5. Berita Acara Aanwijzing / Minutes of Pre-Bid Meeting + Site Visit

Lampiran 6. Absensi Kehadiran Pada Kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting dan Absensi Kehadiran Pada KegiatanKunjungan Lapangan/Site Visit

Lampiran 7. Foto Dokumentasi Kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting dan Site Visit

LAMPIRAN I

SURAT PERSETUJUAN ATAU NO OBJECTION LETTER (NOL) PQDARI BANK DUNIA

r::~i=.o Box 1324!Ji<:T.Jakarta 10013 m Telex: IBRDIA600860 Headquarters:The World Bank,Washington DC,USA

2. We noted that Section 7.16 and Section 8.7 were rmssmg from the proposed TechnicalSpecifications, thus there are no specifications for Item 7.16(1) of package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha),item 8.7(6)(a) of package 11 (Bantal Mukomuko); and also Items 8.7(5) and 8.7(6)(a) of package13 (Sp .Rukis - Tj Kemuning). Please define these Sections and these items to be inserted in theTechnical Specification.

1. We noted that items of Section Day Works have not been included in the Engineering Estimate ofpackage 11 (Bantal - Mukomuko) and package 13 (Sp.Rukis - Tj Kemuning. Please ensure thatsuch items be included in the Engineering Estimate.

Engineering Estimate and Technical Specifications

Based 011 the information provided, we have reviewed the draft PQ documents and have thefollowingcomments:

Please be advised that the remaining contract packages shall follow post-qualification and thatPak Djoko agreed to it in the meeting ofNovember 8, 2013.

\

In reference to Aide Memoire June 2013, it was agreed that DGH may continue to followprequalification for the next round of only four packages (package 11, 13, 15 and 17). However, sincepackage 5 has already been prepared and in order to avoid further delay, the Bank has no objection toDGH's proposal in using pre-qualification for package 5.

\Ve refer to your letter No.HL0202/Bp.l11l405!2013 dated October 31, 2013, which wereceived on November 7,2013 submitting for our review the draft Pre-qualification Document (PQD)for the followingpackages:

1. Package 5: Sp. Rampa - Poriaha, South Sumatera2. Package 11, Bantal- Mukolvluko,Bengkulu3. Package 13, Sp. Rubs - Tj Kemuning, Bengkulu

Indonesia: Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement project (WINRIP) (Ln. 8043-1I))Submission of Propose feB Pre Qualification (PQ) Documentfor Package No.5: Sp. Rampa

Poriaha, Package No. 11:Bantal-Muko-muko, Package No. 13Sp. Rukis - 1}. Kemuning

Dear Mr. Batubara:

Mr. Harris H. BatubarraDirector of PlanningDirectorate General of HighwaysMinistry of Public Works.11. Pattimura No. 20/5Jakarta 12110, Indonesia

Ref.WINRlP /143 November 18,2013

The World Bank WORLD BANK OFFICE, JAKARTAINTERNATIONALBANKFORRECONSTRUCTIONANDDEVELOPMENT J8EB Tower 2, J/. .Jend.SudirmanKav.52-53, Jakarta12190INTERNATIONALDEVELOPMENTASSOCIATION Telephone (62-21)52993000• Facsimile (62-21)52993111

G0r.o. Box 1324fJKT.Jakarta 10013 rn Telex: IBRDIA50086 r,) Headquarters:The World 8ank,Was'l;ngton DC, USA

Elisabeth GollerTask Team Leader WINRlP

Indonesia Sustainable Development DepartmentEast Asia and Pacific Region

'..' ~'.

....;..

Sincerely yours,

Please provide us a copy of final PQD(s) for our documentation.

Subject to incorporation of the above comments, the Bank has no objection to the issuance ofPQD for the above three packages. Please update all dates before the document is issued to theapplicants and please also provide not less than six weeks after the date the documents are available orthe last date of the advertisement, whichever is later, for the applicants to submit their applications.

We would like to remind you that the advertisement of invitation for prequalification of ICBpackage is required to be published in UNDB-online and also in a national newspaper or MPW'swebsite. .

'''Ie understand that the above revisions would not have impact significantly to the current EEand for which the Bank has no objection to the minimum qualification requirements as mentioned inSection III.

5. We noted that for the following items there is a11inconsistency between the BOQ and the TechnicalSpecifications in term of denomination, numbering and definition:- 16 items in BOQ package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha), including item 1.20(1), item 3.1(1)a), item

3.1(1)(b), item 3.4(2), item. 3.4(3), item 4.2(2)(b), itein 6.3(8)(a), item 6.3(9), item 7.1(5), item7.1(7), item 7.1(9), item 7.1(10), item 7.6(6)(d), item 7.6(lS)(b), item 7.11(1)(b), and item7.13(1).8 items in both BOQ package 1I (Banta1- Mukomuko) and BOQ package 13 (Sp Rukis - Tj

Kemuning}, including item 3.4(1), item 3.4(3), item 6.1(1)(a), item 6.2(1)(a), item 6.3(10)(a),item 7.1(7), item 7.1(8), and item 7.1(10).

Please review these items and revise the document as appropriate.

4. We noted that the following items were not included in the Technical Specification:- 4 items in BOQ package 5 (Sp Rampa - Poriaha), including item 3.1(2), item 7.3(3), item

7.7(1)(b), and item 7.12(3).3 items in both BOQ package 11 (Bantal- Mukomuko) and BOQ package 13 (Sp Rubs - Tj

Kemuning), including item 2.4(4)(a), item 8.4(3)(a), and item 8.4(7)(a).Please define these items and insert them in the Teclmical Specification.

3. We noted that item 7.2(1) (a), item 7.2(1)(b), item 7.2(2)(a), and item 7.2(2)(d) in BOQ package 5(Sp Rampa - Poriaha) were conflicting with article 7.2.10.2(a) of the Technical Specifications, inwhich it is clearly stated that such prices and payments in the Items concrete precast (including theIGirder) shall be deemed full compensation and including erection, transportation, installmentand others.Please revise and change these items; also please keep the consistency between BOQ andTechnical Specification.

November 18, 2013-2-Mr. Harris Batubara

•

S5 P.O. Box i3241JKT. Jakarta j 0013 Cl Telex: IE>RDIA60086 Eel Headquarters: The World Bank, Washington DC, USA

Director General of HighwaysDirector of ImplementationAffairs Region IDirector of Technical AffairsHead of Sub Directorate of Financing and Foreign Cooperation, DGHHead of Sub Directorate of Technical RoadsHead of Sub Directorate of System and Controlling Region I as Officer inCharge PMU WfNRIPeTC WINRIP

Cc:

November 18, 2013-3-Mr. Harris Batubara

,.

•

LAMPIRAN II

SURAT PENGUMUMAN HASIL PQ DAN BERITA ACARASANGGAH (BILA ADA)

Ternbusan disampaikan kepada Ytn. :-1. Bapak Direktur Jenderal Bins Marga (sebagai I""n'~,.""w,\? Kasubott Pembiayaan dan Kerjasarna Li.Kif",,"~egeri

(~ KasuiJditSistern Pengendalian WHayahilKetua Peleksana Harlan Prv1U V\f!r,lRIP4. eTC: \!\In\n~lP5.

r~{)hon kiranya untuk oaoat rnenysmpalkan xspada Batai terkait untuk dapat menindaklanjufd~Enganpengun1uman hasH PO dan perslepan peielangan, Selanjutnya, monon untuk dapat

kepada f\3m~Draft Dokumen fengkap yang akan d!gunakar1 danrencena jadv:Jaf !e~anguntuk dapat karni terusxan guns perseusuen Be3nk Dunia,

Bersama in! karni sampalkan surat dart Bank Dunia Ref. W!NR!P/H2 tanggal 15 Juii 2014rnangenaj persetuiuan Bank Dunia ternadap A.EF{ untuk paket o: Sp. Rampa - Poriaha(tertarnpir).

E\t1\a~u~tic4nPor~~fH~di fi::rw'(.r:{.in~i Sf;j!YHIftfif.~

P\~ny~jl1p~ii2:rlP~r~~;tujlH%£l J3t~n~zfJtH1~~(tU~:R)untuk r~a.•~et 5: R~rn.p~

'l,flJ!NRiP iBRD LOi!i1i1~C~4J·IO

Dari

2. lembarLarnpran

t g Jull2014Nemer

EMEf~TER. ADiREKTORAT .,lENf.1 ~ R··· E,; K' TO·· R·. J.\~~ ~ Ol' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

LAMPIRAN III

PENGUMUMAN UNDANGAN LELANG

G': POBox 132~JjKT. Jakarta iODi3 CJ Telex: iBRDIA 60086 e Headquarters: The World Bank, Washington DC, USA

Please inform the result of prcqualification to all applicants who submitted their applications.V/e request you to submit the draft bidding document of this package for the Bank's prior review inorder to enable you to proceed with the issuance of bidding documents to the prequalified firms and toavoid further delays on procurement process,

Subject to incorporation of the above comments and based on the information provided, theBank has no objection to your recommendation to pre-qualify the following applicants for the abovementioned package:1. PT Adbi Karya (Persero), Tbk (Indonesia)2.· PT Bangun Cipta Kontraktor (Indonesia)3. PT Brsntas Abipraya (Persero) (Indonesia)4. PT Hutama Karya (Persero) - PT Seneca Indonesia, 10 (Indonesia)5. PT Multi Structur~ (Indonesia)6, PT Nindya Karya (Persero) (Indonesia)7. PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring, Tbk (Indonesia)8, PI' Pembangunan Perusahaan (Persero (Indonesia)9. PI' Waskita Karya (Persero, Tbk (Indones ia)10, PT Widya Sapta Colas (Indonesia)1I PT Yasa Patria Perkasa (Indonesia)

Vve refer to your letter No.HL.0202lBp.lU0742/2014 dated July 7,2014, which we receivedon July 8, 2014 submitting the: revised Application Evaluation Report (A,ER) tor package 5: SimpangRamps .. Poriaha at PrOVJllCe of North Sumatera including your clarification to the Bank's comments.We still found inconsistency on the cash flow amount of each applicant between summary of evaluationand individual evaluation sheet for each applicant while it is also shown that the amount of Gash flow oftwo applicants {PT Brantas Abipraya and PT Hutama Karya (Persero) - PT Seneca JO) are blank asindicated in the individual evaluation sheet. Please revise and ensure consistency throughout thedocuments,

Indonesia: Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) (Ln. 8M3-IV)Submission of Application Evaluation Report (A,ER), proposed Qualified Application jo!'

Package /'0/0. 5: Simpang Rampa - Poria/us on"Nortt» Sumatera Province

Dear Mr. Batubara:

Director of PlanningDirectorate General of HighwaysMinistry of Public WorksII. Pattimura No. 20/5Jakarta 121 10" Indonesia

Mr. Harris H. Batubarra

RefWn-TRIP /172 July 15, 2014

The \oVorld Bank WORLD BANK OFFICE, JAJ<ARTAII'HERr'~ATIONAL 8AM< FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT J5EB Tower 2, .n. .Jend,SudirrnanKav. 52-53, Jakerta 12190INTERNf',nON!'.L DE\/ELOPMEr~T ASSOCIATION Telephone: (62-21) 52993000. Facsimile: (62-21) 5299311 i

Director of Implementation A~ffairsofRegion I, DGBDirector lor Financing and Foreign Cooperation, D{)Pj :C~GHDirector for System and Controlling of Region l as e)Ie: P1\;ftJ V/IT',rp~~.p"J.)TP.~Director for Reg-ion I I)~D1.A.T

C~·1~C·\l/Il~F.UP

Cc: Director General

Indonesia Sustainable DeveJoprnentEast Asia and Pacific

·TaskTeam Leader \\IIl~FJPElisabeth Goller

" .~'

Sincerely yours,

Mr Harris Batubars

[i'J P.O. Sox 1324/JKT, Jakarta 10013 ru Telex: IBRDIA 60086 ® Headquarters: The World Bank, Washington DC, USA

4. It is indicated in the AER that one applicant (PT Lince Romali Raya) does not meet therequirement of general experience and two applicants (PT Conbloc Infratecno and PT JayaKonstruksi Manggala Pratama) do not meet the requirement of key activities. Please clarifyhow you calculate the production rate of each applicant by providing calculation breakdownsand supporting pages on firm's applications and/or clarification responses. It is also noted thatPT Jaya Konstruksi had done past contract experience in joint venture for which the portion of

3. We note thatrequest for clarification letters were sent by PIU to only 7 (out of the total 14)applicants on the Key Activities. Please confirm that other than the missing qualificationinformation which was requested from the 7 applicants through request for clarification letters,the remaining qualification information provided by all 14 applicants in their applications wasfound by PIU to be sufficient for making the determination of the applicants' qualificationsagainst the specified qualification criteria. If not, please send a written request to seekclarification from the applicants inrelation to the produetien :rate of key activities.

2. Finally, an inconsistency is also found in section 4 Conclusions and Recommendations of AERin the last paragraph. Please revise all as appropriate to ensure consistency.

l. We found some inconsistencies all the documents such as point 3.3 of AER under "GeneralConstruction Experience", in the first and the end paragraph of this subject, it appears that itdoes not consistent with the narrative description of four applicants as written. Moreover, underpoint applicant No.3 (PT Brantas Abipraya) and applicant No.14 (PT Yasa Patria Perkasa), itstill refers to PT Nandya Karya. As to applicant No.7, from the narrative it is not clear whythis applicant did not meet the required experience.

We refer to your letter No.HL.0202/Bp.ll/0404/2014 dated June 9, 2014, which we receivedQll_JlJ:T_1~to, ~Ol_4 ~lJ:llt)1.it:tjl1gth_eAlml_i~atiQl1.Eva_IWl:ti~)l)K~l:>Qrt (A.J;:J~)(Qr pa.c~ag~ 5: ~il11paBgRa.rnpa.- Poriaha at Province of North Sumatera, Based on the information provided, we have the followingcomments:

Indonesia: Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project (WINRIP) (Ln. 804_3-ID)Submission oj Application Evaluation Report (AER), "ProposedQuatiftedApplication for Package

No. 05: Sp. Rampa - Porlaha ( North Sumatera)

Dear Mr. Batubara:

Mr. Harris H. BatubarraDirector of Planning:O:ir~gtomt~Q~~'H~ntlof HighwaysMinistry of Public WorksII. Pattimura No. 20/5Jakarta 12110, Indonesia

Ref.\\TINRIP 1168 June 17, 20,14

The World Bank WORLD BANKOFFICE, JAKARTAINTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT JSEB Tower 2, JI .Jend.Sudirman Kav. 52-53, .Jakarta 12190INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Telephone: (62-21) 52993000. Facsimile: (62-21) 52993111

~.; P.O. Box1324!~KT.Jakarta 40013 r[j Telex: IB,RDIA 60086 r-) Headquarters:The World Sank.Washington DC.•USA

Cc: Director General of HighwaysDirector of Implementation Affairs of Region I, DOHDeputy Director for Financing and Foreign Cooperation, DOP, DGHDeputy Director for System and Controlling of Region I as Ole PMU WINRIP , DIA 1.Deputy Director for Region I B, DIA ICTCWINRIP

Elisabeth GollerTask Team Leader WINRlP

Indonesia Sustainable Development DepartmentEast Asia and Pacific Region

Sincerely yours,

We look forward to receiving your responses on the above including the revised AER. If youwould like to discuss regarding our comments above, please let us know.

6. Please also confirm that in addition to the advertisement in UNDB online, this procurementprocess was also published in local newspaper and/or in PIU's website.

). For the cash flow requirement, it is stated in the- footnote of Section III PUll1t J.l(b) ofilie Prequalification document that the applicant must demonstrate the availability of the requiredliquid assets in the form of a statement showing the amount in the applicant's bank accountand/or through line of credit supported by letter from the applicant's commercial bankconfirming availability of those funds for this contract if awarded to the bidder. However, in thetable of AER, it appears that PlU incorrectly calculated the total amount of the applicant'savailable liquid assets by also including the amount equal to the difference between currentassets and current liabilities based on the latest period of the applicant's audited financialstatements. This is inconsistent with the requirements specified in the pre-qualificationdocument. Please revise the AER accordingly by determining the available liquid asset of eachapplicant based on the documented amount in the applicant's bank account and/or line of credit,as specified in the qualification criteria of the pre-qualification document, In case after havingcorrectly calculated the available liquid asset of each applicant, if the applicant does not meetthe requirement of cash flow (in the form of liquid asset and/or credit line) and if the applicantmeets all other qualification criteria, then in order to avoid restricted competition at thesubsequent bidding stage and also given that the cash flow requirement in any case has to beverified 'as being met at the later stage of bidding, 'the B.an1~will be willing to. consider if PIUwould like to still conditionally pre-qualify all such applicants subject to the applicant meetingthe required minimum amount of liquid assets at the later time of bidding

joint venture is specified. It is unclear whether the production rate mentioned in the report is atotal rate after or before calculated by specific portion. It seems that the :firm carried out thepast contract experience as lead partner of 55% portion of IV. Please confirm that the totalamount of 10,338.02 ton/month for asphalt and 9,011.25 m3/month is the total production ratedone by PI Jaya Konstruksi,

June 13, 2014-2-Mr. Harris Batubara

PT Lince Romauli Raya did not submitted completelydata for general experience and this applicant hadfailed in MCTO requirement so we assumed theclarification was not need anymore for generalexperience. PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Pratamasubmitted the complete data. The committeeevaluated the biggest experience of key specificactivities that had submitted to us (calculation ofproduction rate and supporting pages of data includedin the report). Same case for PT Conbloc infratecnobased on completely data received, the committeeevaluated the highest production rate of the applicantrelated to Aggregate and Asphalt works.

Clarification only to the 7 applicant because theysubmitted data especially for general experiences andkey activities incompletely while the other applicantssubmitted sufficient and complete data in theirdocument. While other applicant is not clarifiedbecause the data entered is meeting the requirementsspecified

4. It is indicated in the AER that one applicant (PT Lince Romali 4.Raya) does not meet the requirement of general experienceand two applicants (PT Conbloc Infratecno and PT JayaKonstruksi Manggala Pratama) do not meet the requirementof key activities. Please clarify how you calculate theproduction rate of each applicant by providing calculationbreakdowns and supporting pages on firm's applicationsand/or clarification responses. It is also noted that PT JayaKonstruksi had done past contract experience in joint venturefor which the portion of joint venture is specified. It is unclearwhether the production rate mentioned in the report is a totalrate after or before calculated by specific portion. It seemsthat the firm carried out the past contract experience as leadpartner of 55% portion of JV. Please confirm that the totalamount of 10,338.02 ton/month for asphalt and 9,011.25m3/month is the total production rate done by PT JayaKonstruksi.

3. Request for clarification letters were sent by PU to only 7 (out 3.of the total 14) applicants on the Key Activities. Pleaseconfirm that other than the missing qualification informationwhich was requested from the 7 applicants through requestfor clarification letters, the remaining qualification informationprovided by all 14 applicants in their applications was foundby PU to be sufficient for making the determination of theapplicants qualifications against the specified qualificationcriteria. If not, please send a written request to seekclarification from the applicants in relation to the productionrate of key activities.

2. Section 4 conclusion and recommendations also hadbeen corrected and now consistent with other section.

2. Inconsistency is also found in section 4 Conclusions andRecommendations of AER in the last paragraph. Pleaserevise all as appropriate to ensure consistency.

1. The narration of point 3.3 points for generalExperience in the first paragraph and the last one hadcorrected.

1. Some inconsistencies on the documents such as point 3.3 ofAER under "General Construction Experience", in the first andthe end paragraph of this subject, it appears that it notconsistent with the narrative description of four applicants aswritten. Moreover, under point applicant No.3 (PT BrantasAbipraya) and applicant No. 14 (PT Yasa Patria Perkasa), itstill refers to PT Nindya Karya, As to applicant No.7, from thenarrative it is not clear why this applicant did not meet therequired experience.

The Committee Answers:The World Bank Comments:

We refer to The World Bank Letter WINRIP/168 dated June 17, 2014 submitting AER for package 5 : Simpang Rampa - Poriahaat Province of North Sumatera, committee has been answering the question below:

6. Please also confirm that in addition to the advertisement in 6. The Committee also announced the advertisement inUNDB online, this procurement process was also published LPSE (Electronic Procurement Services Portal)in local newspaper and/or in PIU's website. Ministry of Public Works Website.

For cash flow requirements in section III point 3.1 (b)we have to fix in accordance with the requested WorldBank, where in the evaluation sheet have includeddata support the bank and current account of eachapplicant. The committee had corrected theevaluation regard to this criteria, some applicant didnot submitted the data and some others based onevidences includes in document did not fulfill therequirements, as suggested by the Bank to avoidrestricted competition, the committee madeconsideration to qualified in applicant who did not fulfillthe requirement for cash flow but meet therequirement in other criteria. For all applicants thefinancial resources must be updated and meet therequirement for this criteria at the bidding stage.

5. For the cash flow requirement, it is stated in the footnote of 5.Section III point 3.1(b) of the Pre- qualification document thatthe applicant must demonstrate the availability of the requiredliquid assets in the form of a statement showing the amountin the applicant's bank account and/or through line of creditsupported by letter from the applicant's commercial bankconfirming availability of those funds for this contract ifawarded to the bidder. However, in the table of AER, itappears that PIU incorrectly calculated the total amount of theapplicant's available liquid assets by also including theamount equal to the difference between current assets andcurrent liabilities based on the latest period of the applicant'saudited financial statements. This is inconsistent with therequirements specified in the pre-qualification document.Please revise the AER accordingly by determining theavailable liquid asset of each applicant based on thedocumented amount in the applicant's bank account and/orline of credit, as specified in the qualification criteria of the prequalification document. In case after having correctlycalculated the available liquid asset of each applicant, if theapplicant does not meet the requirement of cash flow (in theform of liquid asset and/or credit line) and if the applicantmeets all other qualification criteria, then in order to avoidrestricted competition at the subsequent bidding stage andalso given that the cash flow requirement in any case has tobe verified as being met at the later stage of bidding, the Bankwill be willing to consider if PU would like to still conditionallypre-qualify all such applicants subject to the applicantmeeting the required minimum amount of liquid assets at thelater time of bidding.

....,...

'Vic~

.~.~m"i

.Q:::l

E::'::CII·

•C).lI::c

0evOQ.c:a[.lI::C'C«"6,I/)c

tV41

....-t!l

.41CO::.::

<:)

oE,!.\1.,<:)

<:)en....e<11..,....

M.... E,!.\1.,"<t....oNCC'C..,00N oo.....

N....T"".... 'CoEoc

c:i cro"'CII!2"'Ct-oz.Eror0-O'Cijz:mc

·CO.<::CO(f)::::JcCO"'CCOIII

e~~"'CC41a. "<toNcro--,<X

)N3?C

/)

C")

"'""o.NC/)II!o(0

cC'CC'C"'CC'C01CevQ.l!!ttlU

II)a.::c

e<11<11'I::'II!.,lI:II!a....~<11a.<11E<11Z

ro'i:'~s::<11:::I...<11II).Q:::III)<11E<11.Z ~c,c.. .:.:::a.a, (j)o«[email protected]

'<0Co·'iiiroZcro"iii--,crorocro~ro(jjQ.

....: CttlC'C'I::'~evQ.C)cC'C"'C,iIi f/):.:::::::J0::lo:Zo:.:::z~--,0::w:.:::wa,c:((5w>zwa.

z«oz«..JUJ..JUJQ.Z«~::J~::JoZUJa.

As an information in relation on the 14 (fourteen) applicants who submitted the application documents,i (one) of the applicants were submitted the applications as a Joint Opeartions/Joint Venture.

11. PT. Widya Sapta Colas.

12. PT. Hutama Karya - Seneca Indonesia (JO).

13. PT. Bangun Cipta Kontraktor.

1!~. PI. Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk.

9. PT. Waskita Karya (Persero).

10. PI. Adhi Karya (Persero), Tbk.

"II.

6.

PT. Brantas Abipraya.

PT. Nindya Karya (Persero).

PT. Jsya Kenstreksi Manggala Pratama, Tbk.

PT. Vasa Patria Perkasa.

PT. PP (Persero), Tbk.

4.

PT. Conbloe Infratecno.",.).

PT, Lince Romauli Raya,

PT.1Vlulti Structure,1J.

The name of the applicants were submitted the applications, as follows:

1-.s,

5 8 applicants.14 apPlicants44 applicants

applicants

Number ofappticants registered for pre-qualificatioa "Number of spplicants submitted the applicatien documents'Number of applicants did not submitted the application documentsNmnber of applicants late to submitted the application documents

L2.

documeat submitted,Based on above doc u men t s and data in pre-qnalificationProcurement Tea m summarized the result as follows:

21,2013 .

The application subm is-sian was conducted by Procurement Team were based on :" Standard Procurement Document, Prequsliflcerion Document for Prcuresaeat of Works and User's

Guide, The World Bank, August 2006 revised May 2007 atld September 201 0Guidelines: Procurement Under lBRD Loans and IDA Credits puhlished by \~lorld Bank May 2004,RevisedOctober 1,2006& May t, 2010

". Decree of the Presidest of Repu'oJic Indonesia, number 70 year 2012,Decree of the President of Repablic Indonesia, number 54 veal"2010.LOZU1 Agreement Western Indonesia National Roads Improvement Project.Lcaa No. 8043-ID

6. Decree of Kepala Balai Besar Pelaksaaaan Jalan Nasional 1 No, 70lKpts-Brl20D dated on Nov

Today, Monday dated tenth of February in the year of Two thousand fourteen (Feb lOth, 2(14),Procurement Team of Satker Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah II Sumatera Utara Province for\VINRfP IBRD Loan 8043-1D firstly declare that the application. submission of Package 05 Sp.Rampa-Poriaha (Satker Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah nProvinsi Su m ate r a Utara r.Provinceof North Sumatera has closed at 10.nO am (local time). The Application Submission held in the meetingmorn of Balai Diktat PU Wilayah I J1. Bus! Da larn No. iA Me dan , North Sumatera Province

LAMPIRAN IV

SURAT UNDANGAN PRE-BID MEETING + SITE VISIT

Tt':!11bl§an disamDalkan kepada Ylh;'1. KF.pal'l Ba!ai sesar Pelaksanaan Ja;an Nasmall dl Madan;2. Kasalker Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional \¥.la'tah " p(()'i SJmul di ~aJan;3 PPJ<12 (Sibdga, Cs)

Ketua POKJAl> Psn-~atJaaf1Rarang/.Jasa W!NRiPr Paket Sp. Rsnpa • Poriaha

~J~\j\l-~Ir.lrwan. MT

NIP. 19520213 199203 1 002

LJernlklan ~aml sampalkan, atas pernallan d6'1 kerjasamanya kMil UC!lpkan teoma kas h.

· .....am1S!21 AguslllS 2014· 10.00 W1B • selssaJ· Balai Booar Pel1l'<sanaa- Jalan Nasi'lnallJalen $al\j Lubis No 1 Medan

Hart! T3I'l!)9alWakluTA!npill

Cehubu'lgan akan dladakan Pre·b d Meeting Pakel 05 WINRIP Sp Rampe - Poriahll, :lfmg;;n 1111 kami trononberkensn lIehadiran Bapak pads :)re-blc ~ti!'19 Icrsebu' pada'

Penisl . Pre-bid Meeting Pallet 05 WINRlP Sp. Rampa • Poriaha

l\ep<ldaYilt:1. Bapak Ketua Pe!aksallOl Hanan PrAUWlNRlP laRD LOAN No. 8043·l!}2. Bapak Kasubdi!. Wilayah IB, Oit. Binlak 1M11,3. CTCW1NRIP.di-

ill..lllJl

Medan, tg AgdstlJS 2014: 25 Ipo~JoIwl(1f1p:B!.S3l2014NomerLampiran

SATKER PELAKSANAAN JALAN NASIONALWIlAYAH II PROV1N$1SUMUTAlamat: Jn, 8os1Galant No 7M!l1N" Tetp 1J61·7Wl804, Fax.:>61 7866604, il-."'la!l: wiorip pc2@~maiLoom

(KELOMPOK KERJA)JALAN NASIONAL • I

PROCUREMENT COMMITTEE TEAMULP BALAI BESAR PELAKSANAAN

LAMPIRAN V

BERITA ACARA AANWIJZING/MINUTES OF PRE BID MEETING +SITE VISIT

LAMPIRAN VI

ABSENSI KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING DAN SITE VISIT

LAMPIRAN VII

DOKUMENTASI KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING

Laporan Hasil Pengamatan Kegiatan Pre-Bid Meeting, Proses Pengadaan Jasa Pekerjaan KonstruksiWINRIP Loan IBRD No. 8043-ID

Wakil Pengamat dari Masyarakat/Community Representative Observer (WPM/CRO)Paket 05

LAMPIRAN 7: DOKUMENTASI AANWIJZING

Documents

LAPORAN PEMANTAUAN KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING DAN …dms.winrip-ibrd.com/data/C1_BCENR/C1.05_SpRampa-Poriaha/C1.05.06... · LAPORAN PEMANTAUAN KEGIATAN PRE-BID MEETING DAN SITE VISIT