KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse

5 l6 Third Avenue

Seattle, WA 98104

Signature ReportKlngCounty

August 18,2014

Ordinance 17861

Proposed No.2014-0275.1 sponsors Dembowskiand Lambert

1 AN ORDINANCE adopting Growth Management Planning

2 Council Motions I4-1,14-2 and l4-3 and ratifying Motions

3 14-1,l4-2 and I4-3, for unincorporated King County.

4 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COIINTY:

s SECTION 1. Findings:

6 A. Growth Management Planning Council Motion l4-1 recommends that the

7 Potential Annexation Areas map in the2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies

8 be amended to transfer the area known as Klahanie PAA from Issaquah to Sammamish.

9 B. Growth Management Planning Council Motion 74-2 recommends that King

10 County Countywide Planning Policy DP-17 be amended so that proposals to expand the

II Urban Growth Area under the Four-to-One Program are not required to be based on a

!2 need for increased capacity.

13 C. Growth Management Planning Council Motion i4-3 recommends that the

t4 2012KingCounty Countywide Planning Policies be amended to add the urban portion of

15 the area known as the Rainier Ridge Four-to-One to the Urban Growth Area and that the

16 Potential Annexation Areas Map be amended to add the same arcalo the Maple Valley

t7 PAA.

li{¡

I

Exhibit J

18

19

20

2t

22

23

24

Ordinance 17861

D. On }/.ay 21,2014, the Growth Management Planning Council unanimously

adopted Motions I4-I,l4-2, and l4-3 amending the2012 King County Countywide

Planning Policies.

SECTION 2. The amendments to the 20|2King County Countywide Planning

Policies, as shown in Attachments A, B and C to this ordinance, are hereby adopted and

ratified on behalf of the population of unincorporated King County.

Ordinance 1786I was introduced on 7ll4l20l4 and passed by the Metropolitan KingCounty Council on 8/1812014, by the following vote:

Yes: 8 - Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Ms. Lambert,Mr. Dunn, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Dembowski and Mr. UpthegroveNo: 0

Excused: 1 - Mr. Phillips

KING COUNTY COUNCILKING COUNTY, WASHINGTON

r

ATTEST:1-)(JÍ .r-)l--,1.)

t-a)-'r -)

Phiil Chair

Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council

-'s -]*'lb î-J

'J) ltIf'¡ (ì(o ¡-í

t lt

3=+\{-fìli; Lì,JI

APPROVED tnis ?4þday of 2014.

r County ExecutiveDow

Attachments: A. GMPC Motion l4-1, B. GMPC Motion l4-2,C. GMPC Motion l4-3

2

Exhibit J

I23

45

6

78

9

1011

t213

t415

t6l718

t92021

2223

2425

262728

17861

Attachment Asl2U14

Sponsored By: Executive Committee

GMPC MOTION NO. 14-1

A MOTION to amend to the Potential Annexation Areas map inthe 2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies to transferthe Klahanie PAA from Issaquah to Sammamish.

WHEREAS ,DP-23 calls for urban areas that are within a city's PotentialAnnexation Area (PAA) to be annexed to cities; and

WHEREAS, on April 22,2014, the cities of Sammamish and Issaquah signed an

Interlocal Agreement on the future status of the Klahanie PAA, and

WHEREAS, on April 25,2014, the cities of Sammamish and Issaquah submittedthe signed Interlocal Agreement with a request for the GMPC to adopt a motiontransferring the PAA from Issaquah to Sammamish.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Growth Management PlanningCouncil of King County hereby recommends that the Potential Annexation Areas map inthe2012 King County Countywide Planning Policies be amended to transfer the area

known as the Klahanie PAA from Issaquah to Sammamish.

Dow Constantine, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council

Attachment A: Amendment to PAA Map

Exhibit J

The informalion ìncluded on this map has been compiled byKing County stafl lrom a variety of sources and is subject to changew¡ìhout nolice King Coun{y makes no represenlaLions orwaranlies, express or ìmpl¡ed, as lo accuracy, completeness,limeliness. or righls to the use of such informalionThis document is not inlended lor use ãs a survey produclK¡ng County shall nol be l¡able for any general, special,indirecl, inc¡denla¡, or consequenlial damages including, but notlimited to, losl revenues or iost profils resulting lrom the useor m¡suse of lhe inlormation conlained on this map Any sale olthis map or ¡nformation on th¡s map is prohibited excepl by wriflenpermiss¡on of King County

Klahanie PAA Redé3îbnation Map

Urban Growth Boundary

'1,300

Feet

N

mxd6500pdf

Date: 6,2014

\fl rine County

t\¡ccotvtBSP

Redesignated PAA

lncorporated Areas a".' Proposed UrbanGrowth Boundary

\\gisnasl\\gisnasl

am m 5

PAA Gap

SE 32ND ST

ù¡-

Lrl

E BLVD j ¡..

RD

ammamtsPotential - t'i.;' .

-.':reanexation A 'I

oUJØ

¡

ea

a \

.çXA t on

t

io

Exhibit J

1

2

J

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

t213

t415

t6I718

T9

202T

22232425262728

293031

3¿

JJ3435

363738

3940

1786r

Attachment B5121714

Sponsored By Executive Committee

GMPC MOTION NO. 14-2

A MOTION to amend King County Countywide Planning PolicyDP-17 to clarify criteria for expansion of the Urban Growth Area.

WHEREAS, the 2012 Countywide Planning Policies clarified the procedures foramending the Urban Growth Area (UGA.); and

WHEREAS, in accordance with Policy DP-16, the UGA can be amended only ifone of the three criteria is met: (1) land is needed to expand capacity in order toaccommodate projected growth; or (2) land is part of the Four-to-One Program with atleast four times the acreage of the land added to the UGA is dedicated as permanent openspace; or (3) the area is a King County park being transferred to a city or the park land isless than 30 acres in size and has been owned by the city since 1994; and

V/HEREAS, The ability to add land enrolled in the Four-to-One Program or landserving as a park was meant to serve as exceptions to the capacity requirement; and

WHEREAS, as currently written, DP-lla sets up a situation by which even theproposals under the Four-to-One Program would have to meet the capacity requirement.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Growth Management PlanningCouncil of King County hereby recommends that King County Countywide PlanningPolicy DP-17 be amended as follows so that proposals to expand the UGA under the Four-to-One Program are not required to be based on a need for increased capacity:

DP-17 If expansion of the Urban Growth Area is warranted based on the criteriain DP-16(a) or DP-16(b), add land to the Urban Growth Area only if it meets all ofthe following criteria:

a) Is adjacent to the existing Urban Growth Area ((an{));b) For expansions based on DP-16(al only. is no larger than necessary to

promote compact development that accommodates anticipated growthneeds;

c) Can be efficiently provided with urban services and does not requiresupportive facilities located in the Rural Area;

d) Follows topographic.al features that form natural boundaries, such as

rivers and ridge lines and does not extend beyond natural boundariessuch as watersheds, that impede the provision of urban services;

Exhibit J

41

4243

44454647484950

51

52

53

5455

5657

e) Is not currently designated as Resource Land;

Ð Is suffrciently free of environmental constraints to be able to supporturban devel opment without si gnificant advers e environmental impacts,unless the area is designated as an Urban Separator by interlocalagreement between King County and the annexing city; and

g) Is subject to an agreement between King County and the city or townadjacent to the areathat the area will be added to the city's PotentialAnnexation Area. Upon ratification of the amendment, the CountywidePlanning Policies will reflect both the Urban Growth Area change andPotential Annexation Area change.

Dow Constantine, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council

Exhibit J

I2J

4

5

6

78

9l011

12

13

t415

t6l718

19

202l222324

262728293031

3233

3435

3637383940

25

17861

sl2U14 Attachment C

Sponsored By: Executive Committee

GMPC MOTION NO. 14-3

A MOTION to amend the Urban Growth Area map inlhe2012King County Countywide Planning Policies to add the urbanportion of the area known as the Rainier Ridge Four-to-One to theUrban Growth Area and to amend the Potential Annexation Areasmap to add the same area to the Maple Valley PAA.

WHEREAS, The King County Four-to-One Program allows lirnited expansions ofthe Urban Growth Area (UGA.) For each acre of land added to the UGA, four acres ofrural land must be dedicated as permanent, dedicated open space; and

WHEREAS, the Rainier Ridge Four-to-One would add fourteen acres to the UGAadjacent to the City of Maple Valley in exchange for 56 acres dedicated as permanent openspace; and

WHEREAS, This Rainier Ridge Four-to-One proposal was approved by the KingCounty Council's Transportation, Economy, and Environment Committee on April 7,2014and will be considered by the King County Council for final action on May 19,2014.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Growth Management PlanningCouncil of King County hereby recommends that the Urban Growth Area map inThe 2012King County Countywide Planning Policies be amended to add the urban portion of thearea known as the Rainier Ridge Four-to-One to the Urban Growth Area and to amend thePotential Annexation Areas map to add the sarne area to the Maple Valley PAA.

Dow Constantine, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council

Attachments: (1) Map depicting the UGA expansion for urban poftion of the RainierRidge Four-to-One; (2)map depicting the addition of the UGA expansion area to the MapleValley PAA; (3) map depicting the dedicated open space; and (4) vicinity rnap of theRainier Ridge Four-to-One proposal

Exhibit J

Rainier Ridge UGA Expansion ã'fi'd Redesignation Map

King Countyfhe informatjon included on lhis map has been compiled byK ng County slaf from a variety of sources and is subiect to changewilhouL nolice King County makes no representalions orwaÍanlies, express or implled as to accurâcy, compleLeness,tmeliness, or rights to lhe use of such informalionThis document is nol intended for use as a survey produclKing County shãll nol be liable lor any general, special,indrrecl, incidenlal, or consequenÌial damages includrng, but notlimiled to, lost revenues or losl proñts resulting lrom Lhe useo¡ misuse of lhe information contained on this map Any sale ofUìis map o¡ informalion on this map is prohibiled except by wrinenpermission of Kjng County

Urban Growlh Boundary N

L---j tncorporated Areas =4-tì-E Existing Potential Annexation AreL

Recommended PAA

tf,

*

MCCOMBSP

Dale: May 7. 2014\\gisnas 1 \Proj ecls\ddes\201 4_CompP¡an\projects\Raini erRidge_gmpc_locator mxd\\gi snas 1 \ProJ ects\ddes\20'1 4_CompPlan\projects\Raini erRidge_gmpc_locator pdf

Covi

ë

ackDiamond

PAA

ra

\

q

¡

f

ê ê

t

þ

I

,&

ar"%_

Exhibit J

Rainier Ridge UGA Expans¡on ã'rÎ'd Redesignation Map

King CountyThe ¡nformation included on lhis map hãs been compiled byKins Coonty staf kom a va.iety of sources and is subject lo changewithout notice King County makes no represenlalions orwarranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,úmeliness, or rights to the use of such inlormalionThis document is nol ¡ntended for use as a survey produclKing Counly shall not be liable for any general special,rndirect, incidental, or consequentiâl damages incloding, but nollimited lo, losl lost profits resulling kom lhe useor misuse of lhe inlormalion conlained on lhis map Any sale ofhis ¡nap or inlormalion on this map is prohibited except by wrilenpermission ol King counly

Date: l\¡ay 6, 2014

li{¡

N

\\gisnasl\Projecls\ddes\2014_CompPlan\projects\RainierRidge_gmpc_lubw mxd\\gisnasl\Projects\ddes\2014_CompPlan\projects\RainierRidge_gmpc_lubw pdfMCCOI\4BSP

150 300

a",

Feet

rX

ta

um

Rural Cities Urban Growth Area

Rural Area

Urban Res, Medium (4-12du/acre) e Proposed UrbanGrowth Boundary

0

rX

X

ra

(:)

>

Exhibit J

Rainier Ridge UGA Expansion ã'rîb Redesignation Map

\{l rins county "".JoililiË,i:?:iî"åT1,."The inlormaùon included on lhìs map has been compiled by

King County staf kom a va.iety of sources and is subject 10 changew¡lhouL nolice King County makes no represenl¿lions orwaranlies, express or ¡mplied, as lo accuracy, compleleness,timeliness, or righls to the use of such informationfhis documenì is nol inlended for use as a survey p¡oductKing County shall not be l¡able for any general, special,indirecl, inc¡dental, or consequenLial damages including, but notlimitêd lo, lost revenues or losl profils resulling lrom the useor misuse of the ¡nlormalion conlained on lhis map Any sale othis map or inlonnalion on lhis map is prohibited ercepl by wriflenpermission ol King Counly

@E N

Recommended PAA

Recommended Open Space

Existing King County Parks

.:'' ,i Urban Growth Boundary

L---:ì lncorporated Areas

E] Existins PAA

erRidge_os_loætor mxderRidge_os_loætor pdf

Dale: May 22,2014\\gisnasl \Projecls\ddes\201 4_CompPlan\projects\Raini\\gisnasl \Projects\ddesU01 4_CompPlan\projects\Raini¡/CCO¡ilBSP

n

ê

RemainsRural Area

E

b

f

.@

å @

a

BlackDiamond

Exhibit J

Rainier Ridge UGA Expansion ã11'd Redesignation Map

King County

¡ndirect, inc¡denlal, or cons6quenlial dameoes including, bot notl¡mìled lo, lost revenues or læt proñts resulling from lhe useor m¡sse ol lhe ¡nlormalioh oontâ¡ned on h¡s mp. Any sale ollh¡6 map or lnlormallon on lhi8 m¿p ls prohlbited excepl by wrìttenpermlslon olKlng county.

Date: Mây 6, 2014\\g¡snas1\Prqects\ddêsU014_CompPlan\projects\RâinitrRidge_gmpc_paabw mxd\\g¡snas'l\Prciects\ddes\20 14_CompPlan\projects\RainisRidge_gmpc_paabw pdfMCCOMBSP

150

Feet

tf,

N

0 75

ffiffi

King County shâll not be llable lor any

Recommended PAA

lncorporated Areas

N Urban Growth Boundary

.,0: tt Proposed Urban

' .t

Growth Boundary

The inlormalion included on this map hæ be€n comp¡led byKhO County slaffrom a vaiety olsourceG ¿nd ls subject lo changew¡thoul notlce. Klng County mskes no represenldions orwatEnlies, exptess or impl¡ed, ¿s to âccuracy, compl6tenes6,üm6l¡neÊs, or r¡ghts to the use ol suc¡ lnlormâtion

survey produclgenetal, spec¡al,

a ô

SE 288TH

Exhibit J