24
ACC/AHA Guidelines 1 Cardiac Pulmonary Edema and Cardiogenic Shock 胡為雄 胡為雄 胡為雄 胡為雄 2 Frank-Starling Law End-Diastolic Pressure Stroke Volume “In the normal heart, the diastolic volume (preload) is the principal force that governs the strength of ventricular contraction.” Otto Frank and Ernest Starling

Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

work school

Citation preview

Page 1: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

1

Cardiac Pulmonary Edema

and Cardiogenic Shock

胡為雄胡為雄胡為雄胡為雄

2

Frank-Starling Law

End-Diastolic Pressure

Str

ok

e V

olu

me

“In the normal heart, the diastolic volume (preload) is the principal force that

governs the strength of ventricular contraction.”

Otto Frank and Ernest Starling

Page 2: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

2

3

Pulmonary Edema Flow

P : hydrostatic pressures

π : oncotic pressures

Kf : permeability constant of vessel wall

δ : reflection coefficient

4

Pulmonary Edema

Page 3: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

3

5

HEMODYNAMIC CHANGESPROGRESSIVE LEFT HEART FAILURE

Hours

6

Cardiogenic Shock

• Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of inadequate tissue perfusion due to cardiac dysfunction, and complicates 7-10% of cases of acute myocardial infarction

• Without treatment, cardiogenic shock is associated with a 70-80% mortality rate, and is the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized for an acute myocardial infarction

Page 4: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

4

7

Classic Criteria for Diagnosis of Cardiogenic Shock

1. Systemic Hypotension

systolic arterial pressure < 80 mmHg

2. Persistent Hypotension

at least 30 minutes

3. Reduced Systolic Cardiac Function

Cardiac index < 1.8 x m²/min

4. Tissue Hypoperfusion

Oliguria, cold extremities, confusion

5. Increased Left Ventricular Filling

Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure > 18 mmHg

8

NRMI STEMI RegistryN=25,311

Frequency of Cardiogenic Shock : 7-9%

Babaev et al JAMA 2005 294:448

Frequency of CS Has Remained Steady Over Time

Page 5: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

5

9

Pathophysiology of Cardiogenic Shock

10

Causes of Cardiogenic Shock SHOCK Trial and Registry (N=1160)

Page 6: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

6

11

12

Ventricular Septal Rupture

Page 7: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

7

13

Ventricular Septal Rupture

• Incidence 1-2%

• Timing 2-5 d p MI

• PE murmur 90%

• Thrill common

• Echo shunt

• PA cath O2 step up > 9%

• Echo

• IABP

• Inotropic Support

• Surgical Timing is

controversial, but

usually < 48 h

14

Page 8: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

8

15

Free Wall Rupture

16

Free Wall Rupture

• Incidence: 1-6%

• Occurs during first week after MI

• Classic Patient: Elderly, Female, Hypertensive

• Early thrombolysis reduces incidence but

Late increases risk

• Echo: pericardial effusion, PA cath: equal diastolic pressure

• Treat with pericardiocentesis and early surgical repair

Page 9: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

9

17

Acute Mitral Regurgitation

18

Management of Acute MR

• Incidence: 1-2%

• Echo for Differential Diagnosis:

– Free-wall rupture

– VSD

– Infarct Extension

• PA Catheter: large v wave

• Afterload Reduction

• IABP

• Inotropic Therapy

• Early Surgical Intervention

Page 10: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

10

19

20

Right Ventricular Infarction: DiagnosisRight Ventricular Infarction: Diagnosis

Clinical findings:

Shock with clear lungs,

Elevated JVP

Kussmaul sign

ECG:

ST elevation in R sided leads

Echo:

Depressed RV function

V4R

Modified from Wellens. N Engl J Med 1999;340:381.

Page 11: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

11

21

Management of RV Infarction

• Cardiogenic Shock secondary to RV Infarct has better

prognosis than LV Pump Failure

• IV Fluid Administration

• IABP

• Dobutamine

• Maintain A-V Synchrony

• Mortality with Successful Reperfusion = 2% vs. Unsuccessful = 58%

22Hochman et al NEJM 1999;341:625

The Shock Trial has been the most important study

for management guidelines in patients with

cardiogenic shock

Page 12: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

12

23

The SHOCK Trial (N=302)Randomization from Apr 1993-Nov 1998

Primary Endpoint: Overall 30 day mortality

Seconday Endpoints: 6 month and 1 year mortality

24

SHOCK Trial

Primary and Secondary Endpoints

0

20

40

60

80

30 Days 6 months

Immediate

Revascularization

Strategy

Medical Stabilization

as an Initial Strategy

Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint

Mort

alit

y (

%)

46.7%

56.0%

50.3%

63.1%

P=.11

P= .027

Hochman et al, NEJM 1999; 341:625.

Page 13: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

13

25

PCI v. CABG in the Shock Trial

26

SHOCK Trial: Age < 75

0

20

40

60

80

30 Day Mortality

41.4%

56.8%

%

P < .01

0

20

40

60

80

6 Month Mortality

44.9%

65.0%

Hochman et al, NEJM 1999; 341:625.

Immediate Revascularization Strategy

Medical Stabilization as an Initial Strategy

P < 0.002

Page 14: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

14

27

SHOCK Trial: Age > 75

0

20

40

60

80

30 Day Mortality

75.0%

53.1%

%

P < .01

0

20

40

60

80

6 Month Mortality

79.2%

56.3%

Hochman et al, NEJM 1999; 341:625.

Immediate Revascularization Strategy

Medical Stabilization as an Initial Strategy

P < 0.003

28

• Mortality rates also decreased for those pts undergoing PCI

• Use of PCI increased from 27.4% to 54.4% (p < 0.001)

• Use of PCI was the strongest independent predictor of a lower in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.46; p < 0.001)

Babaev et al JAMA 2005 294:448

NRMI Revascularization Rates Over Time By Age

Page 15: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

15

29

6 Yr Outcome of SHOCK All Patients

Hochman et al JAMA 2006; 295:2511

30

Cardiogenic ShockNRMI STEMI Registry (N=25,311)

• Age, 69.4 years

• Women, 42.6%

• Hypertension, 49.7%

• Diabetes, 27.2%

• Prior MI, 23.2%

• Prior CHF, 15.2%

• Prior PCI, 9.1%

• Prior CABG, 12.2%

Mortality Rates Over Time

Babaev et al JAMA 2005 294:448

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1995 2004

60.3% 47.9%

P < 0.001

Page 16: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

16

31

Prognosis Is Worse With NSTEMIlikely related to the extent of underlying disease

32

Multivariable Mortality Predictors

• Increasing age 1,2,3,4,7 and female gender7

• Lower left ventricular ejection fraction 4,6

• Chronic renal insufficiency7

• Initial6 and Final TIMI Flow grade 14

• Lower systolic blood pressure 1

• Diabetes mellitus 5

• Prior MI 2

• Increasing time from symptom onset to PCI 1,4

• Total Occlusion of the LAD 7Mitral regurgitation• Multivessel PCI (p = 0.040) 1,4,6

1 Webb et al JACC 2003;42:13802 Sutton Heart 2005;91:3393 Tedesco AHJ 2003:146; 472

4 Zeymer et al EHJ 2004;25:3225 Tedesco JV Mayo Clin Proc 2003; 78:5616 Sanborn JACC 2003:42; 1373

7 Klein et al AJC 2005; 96:35

Page 17: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

17

33

ACC/AHA Guidelines for Cardiogenic Shock

1. Early revascularization, either PCI or CABG, is recommended for patients < 75 years old with ST elevation or new LBBB who develop shock unless further support is futile due to patient’s wishes or unsuitability for further invasive care.

2. Fibrinolytic therapy should be administered to STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock who are unsuitable for further invasive care and do not have contraindications for fibrinolysis.

3. Echocardiography should be used to evaluate mechanical complications unless assessed by invasively

Class I

34

ACC/AHA Guidelines for Cardiogenic Shock

Class IIa

1. Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring can be useful for the

management of STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock.

2. Early revascularization, either PCI or CABG, is reasonable for

selected patients > 75 years with ST elevation or new LBBB who

develop shock < 36 hours of MI and who are suitable for

revascularization that is performed < 18 hours of shock.

Patients with good prior functional status who agree to invasive care may be

selected for such an invasive strategy.

Page 18: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

18

35

36

CARDIOGENIC SHOCKMECHANICAL SUPPORT

• IABP Counterpulsation

• ECMO

• Ventricular assist devices

Page 19: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

19

37

IABP

38

Page 20: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

20

39

40

IABP support was associated with a ↓↓↓↓ in mortality:* NRMI-2 with lysis, from 67% to 49%

* SHOCK Trial, from 63% to 47%

Page 21: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

21

41

Contraindications to IABP

•Significant aortic regurgitation

•Abdominal aortic aneurysm

•Aortic dissection

•Uncontrolled septicemia

•Uncontrolled bleeding diathesis

•Severe bilateral peripheral vascular disease uncorrectable

by peripheral angioplasty or cross-femoral surgery

•Bilateral femoral-popliteal bypass grafts for severe

peripheral vascular diseaseGrossman’s 2000

42

ACC/AHA Guidelines for Cardiogenic Shock

Class I

1. IABP is recommended for STEMI patients when cardiogenic shock is not quickly reversed with pharmacological therapy. The IABP is a stabilizing measure for angiography and prompt revascularization.

2. Intra-arterial monitoring is recommended for the management of STEMI patients with cardiogenicshock.

Page 22: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

22

43

ECMOextracorporeal membrane oxygenation

extracorporeal life support

44

ECMO

• Short-term cardiopulmonary support

• Buy time to decide the next step

– Recovery

– Transplantation

– Long-term device (ventricular assist device)

– Operation (CABG, pulmonary embolectomy,..)

– Give-up

Page 23: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

23

45

Ventricular Assist Devices

46

Ventricular Assist Devices

• RVAD, LVAD, BiVAD

• Nonpulsatile pump

• Placed in parallel with RV, LV or both

ventricles

• Adjusted to provide total systemic flow of

2-3 L/min/M2

• Complications in 50% of patients:

– bleeding

– systemic embolism

Page 24: Kardiogenik Shock Due to Alo

ACC/AHA Guidelines

24

謝謝謝謝謝謝謝謝