11
Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

  • Upload
    aya

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Juniper Control Aspen Restoration. Aspen, Northern Great Basin. Aspen Restoration: Selective Juniper Cutting and Prescribed Fire. Location; Steens Mountain, Oregon Cutting Treatment – 1/3 of mature junipers cut for developing fuels base in spring 2001. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Page 2: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Aspen, Northern Great Basin

Page 3: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Location; Steens Mountain, Oregon

Cutting Treatment – 1/3 of mature junipers cut for developing fuels base in spring 2001.

Fall Burns – applied October 2001Spring Burn – applied April 2002

Cooperators; Bureau of Land Management, Burns, Oregon Otley Brothers, Inc., Diamond, Oregon

Aspen Restoration: Selective Juniper Cutting and Prescribed Fire

Page 4: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Experimental Design

5 treatment replications.

3 treatments (Control (no treatment), cut & fall burn, cut & spring burn).

ControlCut &

fall burnCut &

spring burn

Page 5: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Measurements:

Project has evaluated …

- Effectiveness of treatments at removing all juniper, from seedling to mature age classes.

- Aspen recruitment

- Shrub cover and density

- Understory cover, density, and diversity

Page 6: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Selective Cut and Fall Fire

Intense fire

September or October burns

Burned with soils dry

Higher risk of fire escape

Page 7: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Selective Cut and Spring Fire

Less intense fire

Late April burn

Burned with soils frozen and at field capacity

No risk of fire escape

Page 8: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Results

FALL BURNS

- 99.9% juniper kill

- increased aspen suckering 6 fold (10,000 ha in 2004)

- sagebrush lost, most other shrubs resprouted.

- increased bareground.

- lost most of the perennial understory except for plants with growth points below ground and with fire resistant seed.

- stimulated T&E species

Page 9: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Results

SPRING BURNS

- 10% of mature juniper remain.

- 50% of juniper seedlings survived. Enough to fully restock site in 70-80 years.

- Increased aspen to 5,000 ha

- Sagebrush lost only under burned trees, other shrubs resprouted or not effected.

- Understory remained largely intact. Understory cover and diversity increased 300%.

Page 10: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Conclusions

• Cut and Fall Burn

– most effective method for removing juniper.– greatest aspen recruitment– greater disturbance severity

• understory• hydrology

Page 11: Juniper Control Aspen Restoration

Conclusions

• Cut and Spring Burn

– less effective method for removing subcanopy and seedling juniper.

– increased aspen recruitment . . . but . . .– reduced disturbance severity

• understory• hydrology• aspen