Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
calgary.ca/centrecity call 3-1-1
Linking Downtown and BeltlineJULY 2010
PUBLISHING INFORMATION
TITLE: DOWNTOWNUNDERPASSURBANDESIGNGUIDELINES
AUTHOR: LANDUSEPLANNING&POLICY
STATUS: ADOPTEDBYRESOLUTION ISCUNRESTRICTED
PRINTINGDATE: 2010JULY
ADDITIONALCOPIES: THECITYOFCALGARY RECORDS&INFORMATIONMANAGEMENT(RIM) DEVELOPMENT&BUILDINGAPPROVALS P.O.BOX2100,STN“M”,#8115 CALGARY,ALBERTA T2P2M5
PHONE: 311OROUTSIDEOFCALGARY403-268-2489FAX: 403-268-4615
2 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
TableofContents
Table of Contents
ExecutiveSummary............................................................................................................3
RoleandIntentoftheGuideline................................................................................4
PublicEngagement.............................................................................................................5
1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................6
2.0 UnderpassAnalysis..................................................................................................10
2.1 Criteria.............................................................................................................10
2.2 EvaluationandRecommendationsofUnderpassElements...........11
2.3 AdditionalCriteria:PedestrianVolumesandCCPKeyPedestrianLinkages...................................................................................12
3.0 UrbanDesignPrinciples.......................................................................................15
4.0 UnderpassDesignGuidelines...........................................................................16
4.1 BridgeStructure(Bridges,Balustrades,Railings).......................18
4.2 RetainingWalls.............................................................................................23
4.3 ActiveEdges..................................................................................................26
4.4 Lighting.............................................................................................................31
4.5 Sidewalk/Multi-usePathways...............................................................35
4.6 Medians............................................................................................................41
4.7 Landscaping....................................................................................................43
4.8 UniversalDesign(Stairs,Elevators,andRamps).....................46
4.9 PedestrianSignage.....................................................................................48
4.10 UtilityInfrastructureIntegration.........................................................51
4.11 UnderpassArt.............................................................................................52
5.0 ImplementationRecommendations............................................................54
5.1 Implementation........................................................................................ 56
5.2 Priorities........................................................................................................ 57
AppendixA: Glossary............................................................................................... A2
AppendixB: UnderpassAnalysis........................................................................ A3
AppendixC: CaseStudy.......................................................................................A63
AppendixD: ProjectCredits............................................................................... A77
3JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
TableofContents ExecutiveSummary
The Downtown Underpass Urban Design Guidelines (the“Guideline”)isanon-statutorydocumentprovidingcomprehensiveurban design guidance for the development of new underpassesandany improvementstoexistingunderpasseswithintheCentreCityarea.TheGuidelineincludesurbandesignprinciplesanddesignsolutions which address common issues associated with Calgary’sdowntownunderpasses related to the followingcategories: Safety,Connectivity, Accessibility, Context,Vitality, Greenery and Beauty.The intentof theGuideline is to createbest-practice solutions inunderpass design and improvements that would guide the publicandprivate sectors. It is intended to achieve a high-quality publicrealm,pedestrianandcyclistlinkages,asdirectedbytheCentreCityPlan.TheunderpassesaregatewaystotheCentreCity’sdestinationsforwork,ar tsandculture,administrationandretail.Thesegatewayshavetobedesignedashighlyfunctionalandinvitingforthevariousneeds of pedestrians, cyclists, public transit and motorists. Thecurrentphysical stateof thedowntownunderpasses is inobviouscontradiction to their mobility and gateway functions within theCentreCity.
ThisGuidelinebrings together aunified vision for all underpasseswithcarefulconsiderationsforlocalcontext.Thiscontextisdescribedbyselectedcriteria,whichwillallowacomprehensibleandtraceableevaluationforallUnderpassElements:bridgestructure,retainingwalls,activeedges,lighting,sidewalk/multi-usepathways,medians,landscaping,universaldesign,pedestriansignage,utilityinfrastructureintegration,andunderpassart.
Based on general urban design principles which address: safety,connectivity, accessibility, context, vitality, greenery and beauty,and the Underpass Analysis, detailed guidelines for all significantunderpass elements have been developed. For every one of theunderpassdesignelements,theGuidelineprovidesanintroduction,the guideline text, the images, and conceptual drawings showingdesignopportunities
TheGuidelinedistinguishesbetweennewunderpassesandexistingunderpassesasdifferentaspectswhichhavetobeaddressed.
The new 4 Street SE underpass construction commenced inSummer2009.Apilotdesignforthefuture4StreetSE ispar tofthisGuideline.Theintentionofthepilotdesignistodemonstratesarangeofdesignopportunitiesforallevaluatedunderpasses.
The successful implementation of this Guideline requirescollaborationofaffectedbusinessunitswithintheCityofCalgary.
4 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
RoleandIntentoftheGuideline
TheDowntownUnderpassDesignGuideline(the“Guideline”)isanon-statutorydocumentprovidingcomprehensiveurbandesignguidanceforthefuturedevelopmentofanynewunderpassandfutureimprovementofexistingunderpasseswithintheCentreCityarea.TheGuidelineincludesurbandesignprinciplesanddesignsolutionswhichaddressurgentandpressingissuesrelatedtoCalgary’sdowntownunderpassesbasedonthefollowingprinciples:
Policy Section 6.1 in the Centre City Plan addresses the“MovementandAccessSystem”:“Establishnorth-southconnectionsandovercomeexisting barriers (e.g., the CPR tracks, the Bow River, and the ElbowRiver)byfacilitatingtheimplementationoftheproposedunderpasses,overpasses, pedestrianbridges andother integrateddesign initiatives.”In addition, theCentreCityPlanSection4.3.2proposes thatphysicalenhancements to existing and potentially new vehicular underpassesplay an important role in implementing the Canadian Pacific Railway(CPR)corridorvisionovertime.TheGuidelineaddressestherelationshipandpotentialdesigntreatmentsforsuchdesignelementsasbridgestructure,retainingwalls,activeedges,lighting, sidewalk/multi-use pathways, medians, landscaping, universaldesign,pedestriansignage,utilityinfrastructureintegration,andunderpassart.
Safety, connectivity, accessibility, context, vitality, greenery and beauty.
TheGuideline’sintentistosetthestageforacoordinatedactionandimplementationbyrelatedbusinessunitsandtheactivepartnershipofstakeholders.
The scope of work involves eight existing underpasses (7 Street SE,MacleodTrailSE,1StreetSE,1StreetSW,4StreetSW,5StreetSW,8StreetSW,14StreetSW),oneunderpassunderconstruction(4StreetSE),oneproposedunderpass(2StreetSW),andonepotentialunderpass(11StreetSW).Thestudyareaforeachunderpasscoversthesouth-north streets , and the lands immediately adjacent to the underpassbetween9Avenueand10Avenue.
5JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
PublicEngagement
ThefollowinginternalandexternalstakeholderswereinvolvedinthisprojecttoensuretheirvaluesareconsideredandreflectedintheGuideline:
Internal Stakeholder Circulation and Comments
LandUsePlanning&Policy/CentreCity
TransportationPlanning/CentreCity
TransportationPlanning/PedestrianandBicyclePolicy&Projects
TransportationPlanning/NetworkPlanning
TransportationPlanning/DevelopmentServices
TransportationPlanning/TransportationSolutions
CalgaryTransit
Roads/SubdivisionDevelopment
Roads/Streetlighting
Roads/Bridges&Structures
Roads/TrafficEngineering
Recreation/PublicArt
Parks/UrbanForestry
CentreCityImplementation
External Stakeholder Circulation and Comments
CalgaryMunicipalLandCorporation(CMLC)
MarshallTittemoreArchitects(MTA)
CalgaryDowntownAssociation
BeltlineCommunityAssociation
VictoriaCrossingBRZ
“4 Street SE Community Link”
TheurbandesignprinciplesincludedinthisGuidelinewerelargely
drawnfromthe“4StreetSECommunityLink”stakeholder
Sessionsheldduring2005-2006,whichinvolvedthefollowingparticipants:
AlanJacobs
McElhanneyConsulting
Scatliff+Miller+Murray
BucklandTaylor
AldermanDruhFarrell,Ward7
AldermanJohnMar,Ward8
AldermanMadeleineKing,Former(Ward8Alderman)
LandUsePlanningandPolicy,CityofCalgary
Transportation,CityofCalgary
CorporateProperties,CityofCalgary
Parks,CityofCalgary
Recreation/PublicArt,CityofCalgary
VictoriaCrossingBRZ
6 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1.0Introduction
Centre City, Calgary’s Hub and the Importance and Function of Its Underpasses
ThefollowingmapillustratesthestrategicimportanceofunderpassesinrelationtomobilitywithinCalgary’sCentreCity.Approximately34,000peoplelivewithintheCentreCity,and160,000peopleareemployedhereandcommutedailytoandfromthisarea.89%ofCanada’soilandgascompaniesareheadquarteredintheCentreCity,aswellasover6,400businesses,over13artandculturespotsarecontainedhere.TheCentreCityistheeconomicengineofCalgaryandcontributeslargelytotheCity’srevenues.Theunderpassesaregatewaystothedestinationsforwork,artsandculture,administrationandretail.Thesegatewayshavetobedesignedashighlyfunctionalandinvitingforthevariousneedsofpedestrians,cyclists,publictransitandmotorists.
• ExistingUnderpasses: 7StreetSE,MacLeodTrail,1StreetSE,CentreStreet,1StreetSW,4StreetSW,5StreetSW,8StreetSW,14StreetSW• ProposedUnderpasses: 4StreetSE,2StreetSW• PotentialUnderpass: 11StreetSW
ExistingUnderpasses
ProposedUnderpasses
PotentialUnderpasses
7JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1.0 Introduction
General Underpass IssuesThecurrentphysicalstateofdowntownunderpassesisincontradictionto their mobility and gateway functions within the Centre City. AcursoryglanceintotheunderpassesunveilsalistofissueswhichmakethisGuidelinenecessary:
• Visuallyunappealingbridgeswithrusting,dirty,darksteelandconcretestructures
• Narrowpedestrianright-of-wayswithlowceilingsandpoorlightinglevelsunderthebridge
• Light/darkcontrast(Blackframeimpact)whileapproachingthebridgeresultinginnegativesafetyperceptionsandcomfortlevels
• Sidewalksflankedbyhighconcretewallscoveredwithcracksandpeelingpaint
• Poordrainagecausedbyrainwateroverflowandsnowmeltingresultinginwaterpoolingoricyconditionsdependingonthetimeoftheyear
• Structuresusedassheltersandtoiletsforthehomelessandplacesforbirdstoroost
• Litteranddebriscollectedthroughoutresultinginanunkempt,unsafeappearance
• Missedopportunitiesforlowerlevelaccesstobuildings,possiblestorefronts,patiosandlandscaping
• Lackofwayfindingelements
• Nodefinedbicyclepathsand/ormissingstreetright-of-wayspaceforcyclists
• Pedestrianpathsatunderpassentrancesandstreetcrossingscluttered
8 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1.0 Introduction
CPR Corridor Potential and Underpasses
ThefollowingimageillustratestheextentoftheCPRcorridorwithintheCentreCity.Thelargeamountofnewlybuiltorapprovedbuildingswithinthelast5years isan indicatoroftheattractionandeconomicpotentialofthecorridorandit’sadjacent lands.Everyunderpass isattachedtodevelopedordevelopablelands.Successfulunderpassdesignandimprovementsrelyonacoordinatedapproachtopublicimprovementworkingwithprivatedevelopments.TheGuidelineconsidersunderpassdesigntoincludetheadjacentdevelopments.
AccordingtotheCentreCityPlan,CanadianPacificRailway(CPR)continuestobeacentraltransportationcorridorinthelongtermbutwithfuturedevelopments,itcomplementsanddefinesadjoininguses.AsgatewaysfromandtoDowntownandmajorsouth-northconnectionsbetweenDowntownandBeltline,underpassesplayanimportantroleinestablishingbothhorizontalandverticallinkagessothattheCPRcorridorvisioncouldberealizedovertime.
CPRCORRIDORNEWLYBUILTORAPPROVEDBUILDINGS
NewlyBuiltorApprovedBuildingsby2008
9JULY 2010
1.0 Introduction
New 4 Street SE Underpass
Thedesignandengagementprocessforthe4StreetSEUnderpassstartedin 2006. Currently there are eight existing underpasses connecting thedowntown core with its southern neighbourhoods. In addition to theseexistingunderpasses,the4StreetSEunderpasswillprovideanewconnectionbetweentheStampedeParkandtheDowntownEastVillage,aswellastheplannedhigh-densitymixed-usedevelopment(“RailTown”),apotentialhighspeedrailstationforpassengerservicesandafutureSoutheastLRT/C-trainstation.TheStakeholderengagementprocessdevelopedthefollowingvisionforthe4StreetSEunderpass:
“Awelcoming, highquality, pedestrian-orientated,multi-modal continuousconnection between the high streets of two vibrant, dense, urbanneighborhoods”.
WithinthecontextoftheCentreCityPlan,itwasidentifiedthatthereisaneedtoprovideurbandesignguidelinesforallexistingandproposedunderpassesinordertocontributetothedevelopmentoftheCPRcorridorvision.Usingthe4StreetSEunderpass as a case study, thisGuidelinecreates aunifiedvisionforallunderpasseswithcarefulconsiderationsgiventolocalcontext.
UNDERPASS DESIGN GUIDELINES
10 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
2.1CRITERIA
2.0UnderpassAnalysis
Eachunderpasshasaspecificphysicalandplanningpolicycontext.Thiscontextisdescribedbyselectedcriteria,whichwillallowacomprehensiveandcomparableevaluation:
Criteria Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltFormDepictsthebuiltenvironmentandthenewlybuiltorapproveddevelopmentsincloseproximitytotheunderpass
Pedestrian
RealmDescribesthevisibleandtangibleelementsforpedestrians
Redevelopment
OpportunitiesDescribespotentialredevelopmentopportunitiessuchasparkinglots,emptysites,underutilizedsitesadjacenttotheunderpass
Linkages Describesexistingandpotentialconnectionsforpedestrians,cyclistsandtransit
RoadDesign Depictsthedimensionsoftheroadcrosssectiondesign
PolicyContext
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
Describeskeypolicydirectionsforpedestrianandcyclistmobility
Aglossary(seeAppendixA)providesdefinitionsforthevarioustermsandexpressionsusedinthisGuideline.
11JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
2.2EVALUATIONANDRECOMMENDATIONSOFUNDERPASSELEMENTS
2.0 Underpass Analysis
Design Elements Descriptions Evaluation Recommendations
BridgeStructure The listed underpass elementsareidentified“designelements”withinanunderpass.
Theelements represent typicalphysical structures/installationswhicheithercouldbe found inanyoftheevaluatedunderpassesorshouldbeconsideredaspartof a new underpass design inthefuture.
All elements are prone todeterioration and destructionandrequireconstantcare,repair,updateoralteration.
Theanalysis is value-basedandhas been undertaken duringspring 2009 through site visits.Value-basedcriteriaare:
• Surfacephysicalimpression
• Functionality
• Safety
• ExistingorNon-existing.
3 groups of conditions (poor/fair/good)providebasematerialsforfurtherrecommendations.
Thestructural conditionof thebridge has been evaluated byCityofCalgary,Roads(Structures&Bridges).
Adetailedphotodocumentationisalsopartofthework.
Basedon:
• thecontextanalysis,
• thesiteanalysis,and
• theevaluation,
Recommendat ions for eachs ing le des igne lementaremadeprov id ingacata logue for futureimprovements .
Balustrades
RetainingWalls
SidewalksStairsandRamps(ifany)
Medians
Railings
Pedestrians/BuildingsorParkingLotInterface
FunctionalLighting
ActiveEdges
AdvancedLighting
BikeFacilities
Landscaping
UniversalDesign
PedestrianSignage
UnderpassArt
SeeAppendix2fordetailedanalysisresults.
12 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
2.0 Underpass Analysis
East Pathway2006 - 5422007 - 3022008 - 334
Palliser Square Parkade2006 - 02007 - 1282008 - 0
Gulf Canada Square Parkade2006 - 40552007 - 32262008 - 5364
Macleod Tr SE North of 10 Av2006 - 13152007 - 13872008 - 1541
9 Av SW West of 11 St2006 - 3852007 - 3212008 - 439
11 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 28172007 - 34452008 - 3253
8 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 89702007 - 102582008 - 8748
5 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 50712007 - 44172008 - 4622
4 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 56752007 - 58752008 - 6155
1 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 72242007 - 86842008 - 7082
1 St SE North of 10 Av2006 - 21242007 - 24702008 - 2471
9 Av SE West of 7 St2006 - 7242007 - 3322008 - 597
.0 260 520130
Meters
Legend
5,100
2006 Pedestrians
2007 Pedestrians
2008 Pedestrians
Pedestrian Volumes16 Hour Totals
Pedestrian Volumes 16 Hour Totals
2.3ADDITIONALCRITERIA:PEDESTRIANVOLUMESandCCPKEYPEDESTRIANLINKAGES
Thediagram shows thehighest (daily)pedestrian countsbetween2006and2008.Thehighlighted streets are the keypedestrian corridors asidentifiedbytheCentreCityPlan(May2007).
Low Volume
Medium Volume High VolumeHigh Volume High
Volume High Volume
2 S
tree
t S
W
4 S
tree
t S
W
5 S
tree
t S
W
6 S
tree
t S
W
7 S
tree
t S
W
8 S
tree
t S
W
9 S
tree
t S
W
10 S
tree
t S
W
11 S
tree
t S
W
13JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
2.0 Underpass Analysis
East Pathway2006 - 5422007 - 3022008 - 334
Palliser Square Parkade2006 - 02007 - 1282008 - 0
Gulf Canada Square Parkade2006 - 40552007 - 32262008 - 5364
Macleod Tr SE North of 10 Av2006 - 13152007 - 13872008 - 1541
9 Av SW West of 11 St2006 - 3852007 - 3212008 - 439
11 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 28172007 - 34452008 - 3253
8 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 89702007 - 102582008 - 8748
5 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 50712007 - 44172008 - 4622
4 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 56752007 - 58752008 - 6155
1 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 72242007 - 86842008 - 7082
1 St SE North of 10 Av2006 - 21242007 - 24702008 - 2471
9 Av SE West of 7 St2006 - 7242007 - 3322008 - 597
.0 260 520130
Meters
Legend
5,100
2006 Pedestrians
2007 Pedestrians
2008 Pedestrians
Pedestrian Volumes16 Hour Totals
2.3ADDITIONALCRITERIA:PEDESTRIANVOLUMESandCCPPEDESTRIANLINKAGES
High Volume Low
Volume
MediumVolume
LowVolume
LowVolume
LowVolume
9 Avenue S
10 Avenue S
11 Avenue S
12 Avenue S
1 S
tree
t S
E
1 S
tree
t S
W
4 S
tree
t S
E
Mac
leo
d T
rail
Cen
tre
Str
eet
East Pathway2006 - 5422007 - 3022008 - 334
Palliser Square Parkade2006 - 02007 - 1282008 - 0
Gulf Canada Square Parkade2006 - 40552007 - 32262008 - 5364
Macleod Tr SE North of 10 Av2006 - 13152007 - 13872008 - 1541
9 Av SW West of 11 St2006 - 3852007 - 3212008 - 439
11 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 28172007 - 34452008 - 3253
8 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 89702007 - 102582008 - 8748
5 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 50712007 - 44172008 - 4622
4 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 56752007 - 58752008 - 6155
1 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 72242007 - 86842008 - 7082
1 St SE North of 10 Av2006 - 21242007 - 24702008 - 2471
9 Av SE West of 7 St2006 - 7242007 - 3322008 - 597
.0 260 520130
Meters
Legend
5,100
2006 Pedestrians
2007 Pedestrians
2008 Pedestrians
Pedestrian Volumes16 Hour Totals
East Pathway2006 - 5422007 - 3022008 - 334
Palliser Square Parkade2006 - 02007 - 1282008 - 0
Gulf Canada Square Parkade2006 - 40552007 - 32262008 - 5364
Macleod Tr SE North of 10 Av2006 - 13152007 - 13872008 - 1541
9 Av SW West of 11 St2006 - 3852007 - 3212008 - 439
11 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 28172007 - 34452008 - 3253
8 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 89702007 - 102582008 - 8748
5 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 50712007 - 44172008 - 4622
4 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 56752007 - 58752008 - 6155
1 St SW North of 10 Av2006 - 72242007 - 86842008 - 7082
1 St SE North of 10 Av2006 - 21242007 - 24702008 - 2471
9 Av SE West of 7 St2006 - 7242007 - 3322008 - 597
.0 260 520130
Meters
Legend
5,100
2006 Pedestrians
2007 Pedestrians
2008 Pedestrians
Pedestrian Volumes16 Hour Totals
14 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
2.3ADDITIONALCRITERIA:PEDESTRIANVOLUMESandCCPKEYPEDESTRIANLINKAGES
2.0 Underpass Analysis
HighVolume-1StreetSW MediumVolume-1StreetSE LowVolume-MacleodTrailSE
15JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
3.0UrbanDesignPrinciples
Thedesignand improvementof thedowntownunderpassesrequireaguidingvision.The followingUrbanDesignPrinciplesprovideageneralframeworkforthisGuidelineandshouldbeappliedtothedesignandimprovementofallstructuralandfunctionalelementsoftheunderpassesasoutlinedinSection4.0:
Vitality
Strongly encourage active uses along underpass streets (small shops,restaurants, services, art galleries, fitness studios, etc.) for any newdevelopmentattheunderpasses.
Greenery
Maximizelandscapingopportunitiesatretainingwalls,medians,corners,parkinglots,andtransitionareasbetweenpublicandprivateproperties.
Explore possibilities to introduce natural light underneath the bridgestructure
Beauty
Incorporateartisticelementsintoretainingwalls,medians,sidewalksurfacesandactiveusebuildingfrontages.
Safety
Provideanopenandcleanappearancetotheunderpassstructure,accompaniedbyintegratedlightingfeatures(theuseofinvitingmaterialsandcolorschemesonretainingwalls,underpassceilingsandsidewalksurfaces).
Connectivity
Provide seamless connections for pedestrians and cyclists as well asmotoristsbetweenDowntownandtheBeltlineneighbourhoods.
Accessibility
Providebarrier-freesidewalkandpathsurfacesandcomfortableconnectionstoadjacentusesforusers.
Context
Relatethedesigntreatmentsoftheunderpassestothehistoricalcontext,localcharacterandexistingpolicydirections.
16 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES16
4.0UnderpassDesignGuidelines
General Policy for the following guidelines:
1. TheGuidelineappliestoallsouth-northunderpassstreets,andthepropertiesadjacent toeachunderpass streetbetween9Avenueand10Avenue.
2. AllimprovementsmustbeinaccordancewithCSAS6-06,CanadianHighway Bridge Design Code andThe City of Calgary DesignGuideline forBridgesandStructures.Thisapplies toall structuralelementslistedinthisGuideline.
3. Thestructuralintegrityofeachbridgewillbemaintained.Itistheintentiontoencourageownersatthetimeoftheredevelopmenttoopenretainingwallsalongtheirpropertyfornewusesinordertoachievethedocuments“activeedge”intention.
4. Clarificationandexaminationofthedetailedownershipofretainingwallsections,sidewalks,stairwells,setbackareas,andbalustradeswillbenecessaryforthefurtherimplementationofthisdocument.
5. The aesthetic upgrade (encasing of pipes, cables, pillars, crosssupports,supportwalls;oralternativelycolouringofpipes,cables,andstructuralelements) shouldbedealtwithonacasebycasebasis,dependingontheoveralldesignconceptandthemeofeachunderpass.The implementationwill includeengagementmeetingswithutilitystakeholdersandthedefinitionofsolutions.
6. All underpasses (with the exception of 5 St SW) may requiresetback clearance in accordance to the Pedestrian and BicycleNeedsPoliciesoftheCityofCalgary.Incasesofretrofitsinnovativedesignandoperationsolutionshavetobedevelopedtooptimizetheuseoftheunderpassright-of-ways.
7. Collaboration of Key Stakeholders will be crucial to successfulimplement of this Guideline. Those Stakeholders may includeTourism Calgary, Calgary Economic Development, CalgaryDowntownAssociation,theCityofCalgary,andlandowners.
General Guidelines
17JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES 17
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Detailed Guidelines
Detailed guidelines for all significant underpasselements have been developed based on theLocalContextAnalysis(seeAppendixB).
For every one of the design elements in thissection,theGuidelineprovides:
• ageneralintroductionaboutthepurposeofthedesignrequirements
• theguidelinetext
• theimages
• conceptualdrawingsillustratingdesignopportunities.
The Guideline distinguishes between newunderpasses and existing underpasses aspresentingdifferentchallengeswhichhavetobeaddressed.
Basic Elements1. Balustrade/BridgeStructure2. RetainingWalls3. BuildingInterface/ActiveEdge4. Lighting5. Sidewalk/Multi-UsePathways6. Median7. Landscaping8. UniversalDesign
Note:Thisillustrationuses4thStreetSWUnderpassasanexample.
9. PedestrianSignage10. UtilityInfrastructureIntegration11. UnderpassArt
88
2
7
4 49 2
21110
13
5 55
6
6
22
18 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. For new underpassbridges the clear spanshould be maximizedthrough the design ofpillars,supportbeamsandwalls. The superstructureshouldbevisually“floating”.
2. For new underpassesthe utility infrastructureshould not conflict withthe aesthetic of thebridgestructure.Allutilityinfrastructure shouldbe integrated into thebridge design so that thepedestrian realm is freefromanyobstruction(seedetailsinSection4.10).
3. Consider the use ofvertical drains to providea smooth surface forpedestrians and cyclistsunderneaththebridge.
4.1BRIDGESTRUCTURE
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Imageshowsmaximizedclearspanforanewbridgewithintegratedutilitylines.
8StSW
X
4.1.1 Bridge Design
19JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4. Existing structural elementssuch as pillars, beams,and supporting wallsof the bridges, whichhave fallen into disrepair,should undergo regularmaintainenance andenhancement throughpainting, repairing andfrequentcleaning.
5. Existing pipes andcables underneath thesuperstructureshouldbeeither encased or visiblyenhanced through brightcoloring.
6. The gateway characterof the underpass intodowntown shouldbecome a dominantdesign feature for thebridge.
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.1BRIDGESTRUCTURE
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
X
X
X
Imageshowsbridgeenhancementandawelcominggatewaydesign
20 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
The bridge balustrade is lessof a structural element thana decorative one. It gives theunderpassafinishedappearancefromvariousvantagepointsandvisually pulls both sides of theunderpasswithitsretainingwallstogether contributing to thegatewaycharacter.
1. Existingconcretebalustradeson bridges constructedprior to the 1950s shouldbe repaired. Existing steelrailings should be replaced,orvisuallyenhanced.
2. Balustrade material anddesign should match thebridgeandunderpassthemein coulour and material toprovideacohesivelook.
4.1BRIDGESTRUCTURE
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
4.1.2 Bridge Balustrade
XImageshowsconceptualbalustradeenhancementwithintegratedlightingelements.
14StSW
1StSW
X
21JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
3. Balustrades could beenhanced with Brise-Soleils(sun-shading techniques).Solar cell panels in Brise-Soleilscouldbeentertainedtoprovidepowerforbridgeillumination.
4. Third-par ty commercialadvertisingonthebalustradeshould not be permitted,in order to maintain clarityof the bridge structure andto enhance the underpassdesign. Community andculturalbrandingcouldbeentertained to a maximumcoverageof 50 per cent ofthebalustrade
4.1BRIDGESTRUCTURE
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Imageshowsconceptualbalustradeenhancementwithcommunityandculturalbranding.
Sunshadingexample
X
8StSW
22 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. The material, colour and patternshould be complementary to theindividual underpass theme, orenhance the visual appearanceof the underpass as a gateway todowntown.
2. Provide railings along the trafficside of a sidewalk where gradedifferences between the sidewalkandthetrafficlanesexist.
3. The height of the railings and theseparation between partitionsshouldaddressanysafetyandcodeconcerns.
4. Thematerial of the railings shouldbe durable to protect bothpedestrian and cyclist (in the caseofanoff-streetmulti-usepathway).Protrusion at handlebar heightshouldbeavoided.
5. The railings should be regularlymaintained,includingyearlycleaningandrepainting.
22
4.1BRIDGESTRUCTURE
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
4.1.3 Railings
1StSW
Imageshowsconceptualrailingdesignforpedestrianandcyclistsafety.
23JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. Retainingwallsareprominentand distinctive underpasselements. Retaining wallscan be divided into threesections:The retaining wallsofSections1and2requirepermanent design solutions,theretainingwallsofSection3 require both temporaryand permanent designsolutions.(seerightimage)
2. Thereplacementofretainingwallsbyinnovativestructuresanduseswhere there is anopportunity to create an“active edge” (see Section4.3).
The following table shows theapplication of various designcases for the retaining wallsections.
1. The material, colour and patternshould be complementary to theindividual underpass theme, orenhance the visual appearanceof the underpass as a gateway todowntown.
2. Provide railings along the trafficside of a sidewalk where gradedifferences between the sidewalkandthetrafficlanesexist.
3. The height of the railings and theseparation between partitionsshouldaddressanysafetyandcodeconcerns.
4. Thematerial of the railings shouldbe durable to protect bothpedestrian and cyclist (in the caseofanoff-streetmulti-usepathway).Protrusion at handlebar heightshouldbeavoided.
5. The railings should be regularlymaintained,includingyearlycleaningandrepainting.
23
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.2RETAININGWALLS
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Section1:Theretainingwallsalongthetrafficlanesunderneaththesidewalkpodium.
Section2:TheretainingwallsunderneaththeCPRailbridgestructure.
Section3:Theretainingwallsthatseparatetheunderpassalongthesidewalkpodiumfromtheadjacentproperties.
Imageshowsconceptualretainingwallsofanunderpass.
Section1
Section2
Section3
12
3
24 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.2RETAININGWALLS
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Retaining Wall Section Temporary Solution Permanent Solution
Section 1 Theretainingwallsalongthetrafficlanesunderneaththepedestrianandbikepaths Notemporarysolution Concreteslabswithdurableandbright
coloredcoating
Section 2The retaining walls underneath theCPRailbridgestructure Notemporarysolution
Designfeaturesinclude:•Enhanceddesign(seeSections4.4
Lighting,4.7Landscaping,4.9PedestrianSignageand4.11UnderpassArt)
•A“theme”application(e.g.Railhistory,Stampede,GatewaytoDowntown)throughouttheunderpass
•Colourfulanddurablematerialssuchasceramictilesorglazedbrickswhichcanresistvandalism(graffiti),climateimpactandaging
Section 3Theretainingwallsthatseparatetheunderpassfromtheadjacentproperties.
Section3oftheretainingwallistemporaryuntilnewdevelopmentstakeplace.Newdevelopments,whichareborderingretainingwalls,arerequiredtotransformtemporaryretainingwallsintopermanentsolution.Individualconcreteslabscouldprovideatemporarysolution.
Designfeaturesinclude:
Activeedgesolutions(seeSection4.3).•Enhanceddesign(seeSections4.4
Lighting,4.7Landscaping,4.9PedestrianSignageand4.11UnderpassArt)
•A“theme”application(e.g.Railhistory,Stampede,GatewaytoDowntown)throughouttheunderpass
•Colourfulanddurablematerialssuchasceramictilesorglazedbrickswhichcanresistvandalism(graffiti),climateimpactandagingforalongtime
•Materialsforthecopingwhichgivetheretainingwallavisualfinish
New
Un
der
pas
ses—
4th
St
SE
an
d 2
nd
St
SW
25JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.2RETAININGWALLS
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Retaining Wall Section Temporary Solution Permanent Solution
Section 1The retaining walls along the trafficlanes underneath the pedestrian andbikepaths
NotapplicableConcreteslabswithdurableandbrightcoloredsurfacematerials
Section 2Theretainingwallsunderneaththebridgestructure
Notapplicable
Designfeaturesinclude:
•Enhanceddesign(seeSections4.4Lighting,4.7Landscaping,4.9PedestrianSignage,and4.11UnderpassArt)
•A“theme”application(e.g.Railhistory,Stampede,GatewaytoDowntown)throughouttheunderpass
•Applicationofcolorfulanddurablematerialssuchasceramictilesorglazedbrickswhichcanresistvandalism,climateimpactandagingforalongtime
Section 3Theretainingwallsthatseparatetheunderpassfromtheadjacentproperties.
Notapplicable
Designfeaturesinclude:
•Activeedgesolutions(seeSection4.3).
•Enhanceddesign(seeSections4.4Lighting,4.7Landscaping,4.9PedestrianSignage,and4.11UnderpassArt)
•A“theme”application(e.g.Railhistory,Stampede,GatewaytoDowntown)throughouttheunderpass
•Colorfulanddurablematerialssuchasceramictilesorglazedbrickswhichcanresistvandalism,climateimpactandagingforalongtime
•Materialsforthecopingwhichgivetheretainingwallavisualfinish
Exi
stin
g U
nd
erp
asse
s
26 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
“Active Edge” is characterized by continuous, pedestrian-oriented storefrontsalongbothsidesofanunderpassstreetwithwindowsanddoorsfacingdirectlytothesidewalk.Itstartsoneithersideofthebridgestructurethatsupportstherails.Asapedestrianaccessiblearea, itneedsadditionaldesigncomponents(buildingfacades, pedestrian signage, lighting, trees, street furniture, landscaping, outdoorpatios,art,etc.),whichcontributetothepedestrianfriendliness.
1. Building uses: Inordertocreate“activeedges”,newandexistingbuildingsshouldprovideandadapt topedestrian-orientedretailusesat thesidewalklevelalongtheunderpassstreet.
2. Building frontages: New buildings and renovations of existing buildingsshould provide a frontage interface along the underpass street directlyaccessiblefromthepublicsidewalk.Thebuildingfrontageinterfacemayincludethefollowingelements:
•Frequent building entrances every 15 metres along the street directlyaccessiblefromthesidewalklevelwithminorgradechanges
•Windowopeningswithlargewindowpanes
•Façadedesignandwindowilluminationgearedtowardspedestrians
•Colonnades,overhangs,patios,sittingareas,landscaping,publicart,stairsandramps
•Electricalorspotlightedadvertisingsignsandbladesignsattachedtostorefronts
•Cornersetbackandcornertreatmentofbuildingstoadapttogradechanges
• Patios,landscaping,kiosksanddecorativeelements
3. Setback: RegulatedsetbacksaccordingtotheLandUseBylaware2.134malongbothsidesofallunderpassstreets.1StreetSE,MacleodTrailSEand14StreetSWhavea5.182msetbackonbothsidesofthestreet.Theseregulatedsetbacksapplyonlytothenorthsideofthe9AvenueSWandsouthsideof10AvenueSWandomitstheCPRcorridorbetween9AvenueSWand10AvenueSW(theunderpassblock).TobeconsistentwiththeLandUseBylawand to allow flexibility in creating improved pedestrian interface with bikefacilities, treeand furnishingzonesetc., thisGuidelinerecommendssidewalklevelsetbackrequirementsof2.134mand5.182m,withintheCPRcorridorarea.
26
4.3ACTIVEEDGES
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
SetbackexampleofanewdevelopmentonCPRcorridor
27JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Case 1: Improvement of existing situations (where structurally and functionally feasible)
1.Encouragetheadaptivereuseofexistingbuildings,byprovidingsmallretailusesaccessiblefromstreetcorners.
4.Openupdoorsandwindowsfacingthestreet,andprovidestairsandrampstoaddressthegradedifferences.
5. Discouragefencesalongprivatepropertylines.
6. Encouragestepped,landscapedretainingwallsorotherretainingwalltreatments.
7. Providerecessedplazaareas/patios.
8. Usewindowilluminationanddesignthatispedestrianscaled.
9. Providelandscapingalongbuildingsetbackareasandparkinglotedges.
10.Providecomfortableseatingopportunitiesonthelowerportionoftheretainingwalls.
11.Use lighting, murals, signs, and other approaches to enhancebuildingfaçadesfacingthestreets.
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.3ACTIVEEDGES
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
SituationatMacLeodTrail:Minorgradedifferencebetweensidewalkandprivateproperties-Potentialforadaptivereuse,openingupdoorsandwindows,patios,etc.
Imageshowsconceptualactiveedges
28 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.3ACTIVEEDGES
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Case 2: New Development - build to property line
1. Toprovideanactiveedge,anynewdevelopmentshouldincludethebuildinguses, the frontages,and thesetbacksas recommended in this sectionof theguideline.
2. Incaseofbuildingtopropertyline,asetbackshouldberequiredatthesidewalklevelonlytowidenupthepedestrianrealm,whilealltheotherlevelscanbebuilttothepropertyline.
4STSW
Imageshowsconceptualsetbackdesign-buildtopropertyline
SETB
ACK
OF SI
DEW
ALK
LEVE
L ONL
YPr
oper
tyL
ine
29JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.3ACTIVEEDGES
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Case 2: New Development - build to property line
1. Toprovideanactiveedge,anynewdevelopmentshouldincludethebuildinguses, the frontages,and thesetbacksas recommended in this sectionof theguideline.
2. Incaseofbuildingtopropertyline,asetbackshouldberequiredatthesidewalklevelonlytowidenupthepedestrianrealm,whilealltheotherlevelscanbebuilttothepropertyline.
Case 3: New Development - large setback from property line
1. Encourage larger building setback areas which function as publiclyaccessible private space. The setback areas could be designed asalinearplazaorparkalongthesidewalk,orasacourtyardorsunkenplaza.
2. Thesetbackareasshouldbesurroundedbyactiveuses.
3. Interior and exterior stairs, elevators, and ramps may be required to dealwith the grade differences between the sidewalk and the natural grades.Acombinationofslopedorsteppedlandscapingandretainingwallsofadjacentpropertiesmayalsobeconsidered.
Imageofasunkenplazadesignalongtheunderpassstreet
Imageshowsconceptualsetbackdesignandgradechanges-largesetback
30 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES30
4.3ACTIVEEDGES
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Case 4: New Development - grade differences
Option A - 5.182m setback with exterior stairs
:5.182m required setbacks frompropertyline(PL).
:Maintain3mclearsidewalkzone:1.5mtreeandfurnishingzone:Additional3msetbacksforupperlevels•Requireactiveusesalongthesidewalks•Provisionofexteriorstairs,ramps,andpatios
to deal with grade differences betweensidewalksandactiveuses
•Require frequent entrances every 15malongthesidewalks
Option B - 2.134m setback with interior stairs
:2.134mrequiredsetbacksfromP.L.onlyfortheactiveusesatthesidewalklevel
:Maintain3mclearsidewalkzone:1.5mzoneforlandscapingandfurnishing:Nosetbackrequirementsforupperlevels•Require active uses at the sidewalk level
withnoexteriorgradechanges•Provision of interior stairs and ramps to
dealwithgradedifferences
OPTIONA OPTIONB
Parking
A4
B4
A1
A3
A2
B2
B1
B3
PL
Image 20:
Parking
Parking Parking
A3
Prop
erty
Lin
e
Prop
erty
Lin
e
B3
A1 A2 B2 B1
A4
B4
Parking
Storefronts
Storefronts
Storefronts
31JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Thestrategiclightingofunderpassstructuresis a key element in achieving the desireddesign impact creating “gateways todowntown”. Incorporating strategic lightinginto the underpass creates an appearanceofanattractive,safeenvironment.Lightingisan integral element in the development ofanattractiveCentreCityandshouldincludethefollowingelements:
Lighting of traffic lanes
Lightingoftrafficlanesisessentialforcomfortand safety.Approaching the underpass, theusual“blackholewindow”effect shouldbeavoidedbyahighluminanceunderneaththebridgestructure:
1. Consider the application of lightingtechnology underneath the bridge thatprovideshighpavementluminancewhichmakesitpossibleforobjectstobeseen.
2. Mast lighting should be integrated intothe median.With mast location on themedian, the lighting design could visuallycontributetotheunderpassoveralldesignandtheme.
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.4LIGHTING
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Case 4: New Development - grade differences
Option A - 5.182m setback with exterior stairs
:5.182m required setbacks frompropertyline(PL).
:Maintain3mclearsidewalkzone:1.5mtreeandfurnishingzone:Additional3msetbacksforupperlevels•Requireactiveusesalongthesidewalks•Provisionofexteriorstairs,ramps,andpatios
to deal with grade differences betweensidewalksandactiveuses
•Require frequent entrances every 15malongthesidewalks
Option B - 2.134m setback with interior stairs
:2.134mrequiredsetbacksfromP.L.onlyfortheactiveusesatthesidewalklevel
:Maintain3mclearsidewalkzone:1.5mzoneforlandscapingandfurnishing:Nosetbackrequirementsforupperlevels•Require active uses at the sidewalk level
withnoexteriorgradechanges•Provision of interior stairs and ramps to
dealwithgradedifferences
5STSW
Imageshowsconceptuallit-upunderpasstrafficlanes.
4.4.1 Functional Lighting
Parking
Parking
Storefronts
32 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.4LIGHTING
Lighting of pedestrian areas including stairwells, ramps and hand rails
Thesenseofcomfortandsafetyinanunderpassisofhighimportanceforpedestriansandisacrucial factor for providing an attractive andpedestrian-friendlyenvironment:
1. In addition to the illumination of theunderpass structure, lighting elementsforminga“lightpath”shouldbeembeddedinto the sidewalk surface, stairwells andramps. Embedded lighting elementsunderneath the bridge span to separatethe pedestrian areas from bike paths areencouraged.
2. In addition to high mast lighting whichprovidesluminanceforthetrafficlanesandsidewalks,pathwaylightingisencouragedtoprovide additional lighting atmosphere forpedestriansandcyclists.
Imageshowsconceptuallit-uppedestrianareaunderneathrailbridgestructure.
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
33JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.4LIGHTING
Lighting of bridge structures
Avoidanceofdarksurfacesandunlitcornersis essential for creating an inviting ambianceespecially during nighttime and during poorweatherconditions.
Typically the underside of bridge structuresandthepillarsprovidepoorvisibilityanddarkzones.Lightingelementsshouldbepositionedon theundersideof thebridge toprovideabright passageway without leaving dark orshadedareas.
1. Distinguish lighting elements to provide acomprehensive illumination in addition tothe functional lighting (see Section 4.4.1)shouldbeincorporatedintothebalustradeandtheretainingwallsalongthesidewalk.
Imageshowsconceptuallightingunderneatharailbridgestructure,andshowsilluminationofretainingwallsalongsidewalkandbalustrade
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
34 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.4LIGHTING
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Lighting of foliage / Seasonal lighting
1. Trees, bushes andplanterboxes appearblackafter dark. Clear visibility is essential withintheunderpass.Trees,bushesorplanterboxeswithintheunderpassright-of-wayorwithintheset-backzonealong the retainingwallsof theunderpassshouldbeilluminated.
2. Thegatewayfeatureoftheunderpassesmaybeenhanced through the installation of seasonallighting(e.g.,ChristmasandStampede).
Lighting of facades and active edges
1. The design of an “active edge” is successful,if building design and public realm designcomplement one another (see Section 4.3).Building façades along the underpass “activeedge” should be illuminated to provide aninvitingatmosphereatnightandafterdark,andtocomplementthestreetillumination.
2. Opportunitiesshouldbeexploredtointroducenatural lighting to the underpass. This mayinclude the integration of the followingelementswhere structurally feasible:openings,prisms,mirrors,translucentmaterials.
35JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.5SIDEWALK/MULTI-USEPATHWAY
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
OneoftheobjectivesoftheCentreCityPlanis tomake theCentreCity awalkableplacethatissafe,secure,accessible,legible,interestingandenjoyableforpedestriansandcyclists.
Thedesignofthepedestrianrealm(includingedge zone, furnishings zone, throughwayzone,frontagezoneasillustratedattheright)at underpasses plays a key role in fulfillingthe concept of “pedestrian first”. Section4.5 focuses on the throughway zone of thepedestrianrealm.
Section4.5illustratesoptionsforbicycleaccessat underpass streets,which includeoff-streetmulti-use pathways, on-street shared travellanes,andon-streetbikelanes.
4.5.1 Pedestrian First
FrontageZone
public realm private realmwith public access
Prop
erty
Lin
e
ThroughwayZone
EdgeZone
FurnishingsZone
AdaptedfromtheCentre City Plan,2007
UnderpassStreetPedestrianZones
36 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. New development alongthe underpass street shouldprovide a 3m sidewalk width(the “throughway zone”) withminimum obstructions. Asidewalkwidthlessthan2.4misprohibited.With limited space,an expanded sidewalk areacan be achieved through theuse of building setback at thesidewalk level comprising partof the throughway zone (referto Section 4.3 Active Edgesfor recommended setbackrequirements). The expandedarea should remain free ofphysicalobstructions.
2. The width of an Off-StreetMulti-use Pathway should be4.5-5.0m comprised of a 3m(sidewalk) and 1.5-2m (cycletrack).
4.5SIDEWALK/MULTI-USEPATHWAY
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
4.5.2 Sidewalk and Cycle-Path (Off-Street Multi-Use Pathway), and On-Street Bike Lane Dimensions
8STSWSidewalk
4STSWSidewalk
Side
wal
k
Side
wal
k
Off-StreetMulti-UsePathway
Off-StreetMulti-UsePathway
Cyc
leT
rack
Cyc
leT
rack
37JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
3. Underpasseswithhighbicyclevolumesshouldbeprovidedwithadditionalcyclefacilities:
•Thewidthofanon-streetsharedtravellaneshouldbe4.0-4.5m
•Thewidthofanon-streetbikelaneshouldbe1.5-2m
4. Allstairsshouldbeprovidedwithabikechannel.
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.5SIDEWALK/MULTI-USEPATHWAY
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
5STSWSharedTravelLane
4STSWInappropriateSidewalkUse
Bike
Lan
e
Bike
Lan
e
SharedTravelLane
SharedTravelLane
Side
wal
k
Side
wal
k
38 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Thetypicalsidewalksattheunderpassesvaryinelevationsandwidths from the 9 and 10Avenue intersections down to thesidewalklevelsunderthebridges.
1. In case of new construction, the elevation of the streetshouldbecoordinatedwiththeelevationofthesidewalkandsurroundingbuildings.
2. Provide smooth and moderate grades and cross slopes toensurecomfortablewalkingandseamlesstransitionbetweendifferent grades (e.g. street corners, sidewalks/multi-usepathways,entrancestoadjacentbuildings)accordingtocode.
3. Where possible, a minimum 1.5m furnishing zone (alsofunctioning as landscaping zone andutility corridor) shouldbeprovidedbetweentrafficlaneandthethroughwayzone.
4. New developments are encouraged to provide rest areas(outdoorpatios,streetfurniture,trees,flowerbeds,planters,etc.)withinthebuildingfrontagezoneasanextensionofthesidewalk/multi-usepathway.
5. Buildingentrancesfacingtheunderpassstreetshouldprovidestairs and ramps.The entire sidewalk or a portion of thesidewalkadjacenttothebuildingcanberampedtoprovidewheelchair access.Where the sidewalk is notwideenoughto accommodate both stairs and ramps at the entrances,an alternative corner entrancewith at-grade access to thebuildinghallwayshouldbeprovided.
6. For high pedestrian volume underpasses, opportunities forlightingandpublicartembeddedinthesidewalkshouldbeexploredtoenhancethestreetscapecharacter.
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Imageshowsgradetransitionsincludingoutdoorpatios,rampsandlandscapingforaccommodatinghighpedestrianvolume.
4.5.3 Pedestrian Realm Design and Avoidance of Physical Obstructions
4.5SIDEWALK/MULTI-USEPATHWAY
39JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
7. The pedestrian routes should be free ofany physical obstruction (e.g., signal poles,lightingbases,garbagecans,parkingmetres).Ifthereisnooptionalspaceforthephysicalelements, the sidewalk width should beincreased to ensure usable minimumpedestrianspaceof2.4minbothwidthandheight.
8. Streetcornersshouldbeclearofanyphysicalobstruction as well. Any adjacent privatedevelopment is encouraged to provide arecessedcornerplazaareacombinedwiththebuildingentrance.
9. Otherphysicalobstructionsattachedtothebridgestructureandretainingwalls(suchaslightingelements,utilitypipes,signage,etc.)shouldbeavoidedduetotheirintrusiontothesidewalkspace.
10. Any uneven sidewalk surface should beavoidedtopreventhazardsforpedestriansandcyclists.
11. Improved drainage design (instead ofhorizontal drainage with catch basinslocatedinthemiddleofasidewalk)shouldbeconsideredinordertoprovideasmoothanddrysidewalksurface.
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Concretelightingbaseatunderpassstreetcorner
Trippinghazardatunderpassstreetcorners
Utilitypipesoverastairwellon8STSW
Cornersampledesignofpedestriantransitionbetweendifferentgrades:
• At-gradebuildingentranceatstreetcorner• Buildingentrancefacingtotheunderpassstreetcombinedwithgentleslopedsidewalk,stairs,
patios,colonnades,andlandscaping
X
X
X
4.5SIDEWALK/MULTI-USEPATHWAY
40 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. The sidewalk/multi-use pathway materialsgenerallyconsistofconcreteorasphalt.
2. All sidewalk/multi-use pathway materialsshouldbehard surfaced,durableand slip-resistantconsideringthewinterconditionsinCalgary.
3. For underpasses with a high pedestrianvolume (see Section 2.3) should exploretheuseofcolouredasphalt,colouredandstamped concrete, and other decorativematerials(tile,stoneandbrick).Thepaversshould be large and smooth enough toavoid uncomfortable vibration for cyclistsandpeopleusingwheeledconveyances.
4. The combination of concrete/asphalt anddecorative materials are recommended(e.g., concrete sidewalks with brick/stonetrim)forsidewalk/multi-usepathway.
5. In thecaseofamulti-usepathwaydesign,coloured concrete/stone/brick trim isrecommendedtoprovideavisibletransitionedge. Level changes should be avoidedbetween the sidewalkand thecycle track.Small lighting elements embedded in thetrim zone can be considered to ensurevisibility during evenings for cyclists andpedestriansincludingthevisuallychallenged.
4.5SIDEWALK/MULTI-USEPATHWAY
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines4.5.3 Pedestrian and Cyclist Realm Materials
Combinationofdifferentmaterials
41JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.6MEDIANS
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
All downtown underpasses should beprovided with attractive street medians.Pending on the available median width, avariety of median design elements shouldbeappliedsothatthemedianbecomespartof the image-building for theunderpassesasgatewaysintodowntown:
1.BasedontheCityofCalgaryTransportationroaddesignspecificationsandParksSustainableDevelopmentGuidelinesforTrees,ShrubsandGroundCovers2009,theunderpassmedianscouldaccommodateplanterareasforshrubsandgrass,whichwouldsurvivetheharshmedianconditions.(Note:Thedowntownunderpassmedianswidthwillnotallowsustainabletreeplanting).
2.Duringthevegetationperiod,seasonalflowerplantingshouldbepartoftheyearlyunderpassmaintenance.
3.Ifplantingwithinthemedianisnotpossibleorfeasible,themedianshouldincorporaterockgardendesignorrockformations.
5STSWMedian
4STSWMedian
Medianwithseasonalflowerplanting
42 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines4.6MEDIANS
4. InconjunctionwithUnderpassArt(seeSection4.11)themediandesignelementscouldsupportartthemes,specificpromotionalactivitiesofthedowntownbusinesscommunity,andwayfindingsignage.
5. Mediansshouldaccommodatestreetlightingposts,whichprovidetrafficlanelighting.Lightingpostcombinedwithbannerholders(seeSection4.4.)couldcontributetotheoverallappearanceoftheunderpass.
Medianwithflowerpotsandartfeature
Medianwithlightpostsandbanners
43JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
The Centre City Plan calls for urban ecology as part of aresponsible approach to city building.The Plan suggestsevery new and renovated building is an opportunity tomeet this objective. There is currently a deficiency ofgreenspaceavailable tomeet theneedsof residentsandofficeworkers livingandworking intheCentreCityarea.Trees,shrubs,flowerbeds,andevengrassarepartofthestreetscape design that increases the level of pedestriancomfort.Currently the following issues are identified thatneedattentionwhileanewdevelopmentorimprovementstoanexistingdevelopmentisproposedalongtheunderpassstreets:•Thereisalackoflandscapingalongthestreets,surface
parkinglots,atthemedians,corners,andretainingwalls.•Theinterfaces(oftendefinedbylandscaping)between
pedestrianrealmandadjacentdevelopmentsarepoorlydesigned.
•Theadjacentvacantlandsorparkinglotsdonotprovideavarietyofecologicaldesigntreatmentssuchaswell-maintainedlandscapedstreetedges,permeablesurfacestomanagestormwateron-site,bio-retentionareasforsnowstorage.
The following landscaping interventions should beincorporated when an improvement of an existingunderpass/developmentoranewunderpass/developmentisbeingconsidered:1. Retainandprotectexistingtrees,vegetationandnatural
slopes.2. Integrate existing landscaping features into the overall
publicrealmandlandscapingdesign.
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines4.7LANDSCAPING
4. InconjunctionwithUnderpassArt(seeSection4.11)themediandesignelementscouldsupportartthemes,specificpromotionalactivitiesofthedowntownbusinesscommunity,andwayfindingsignage.
5. Mediansshouldaccommodatestreetlightingposts,whichprovidetrafficlanelighting.Lightingpostcombinedwithbannerholders(seeSection4.4.)couldcontributetotheoverallappearanceoftheunderpass.
Existingstreetinterface
Existingparkbordering1StreetSE-opportunitiesforbetterpedestrianinterfacelandscapingtreatmenton8StreetSW
44 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.7LANDSCAPING
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
3. Maximize landscapingopportunitiesatretainingwalls, medians, corners,parking lots, buildingsetback areas, and areasbetween sidewalksand traffic lanes wherepossible.
4. Considerprovidingflowerbeds/planters to beautifythestreetswhere limitedspaceisavailablefortrees.
5. Where landscapingmight obstruct driverandpedestrianviews,uselower shrubs and high-branchingtrees.
6. Provide surface forcomfortable seating attheedgeof theplanters/flowersbeds.
7. Where retaining wallscannot be avoided,provide lower terraces,use durable, attractivematerials,andincorporateintensivesoftlandscaping.
Imageoflandscapingintegrationintounderpassstreets.
Imagesfromthevicinityofunderpasses
Landscapedretainingwalls
45JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.7LANDSCAPING
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
8. GreenSurfaceParkingLots
• Providelandscapededgesalongtheunderpassstreetstosoftenandscreenthesurfaceparkinglots,insteadofusingfences.
• Wherepossible,usepermeablepavers(e.g.,openjointpavers,turfgrid,porousasphalt,perviousconcrete)insteadofstandardconcretepavingatparkinglotsandsomeotherlow-trafficflowareas.
• Ensurethematerialsselectedaredurableenoughtowithstandtheanticipatedtrafficloadingstressesandpotentialmaintenanceimpacts.
• Thelandscapingedgesoftheparkinglotsshouldbewell-maintained.
Permeablepavers-turfgrid Permeablepaving-porousasphalt
Landscapededgealongparkinglot Permeablepaversatparkinglot
46 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.8UNIVERSALDESIGN
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Stairs, ramps, pavements, and railingsencompassed into the underpassstructure should provide a cohesivesolution and a well-designedenvironment for people of all abilities.DesignsolutionsshouldalsorespondtotheclimatevariationsinCalgary.Designelements (All Designs refer toAlbertaBuildingCode2006andCityofCalgaryAccessDesignStandards—Draft2009)shouldinclude:
1. Tactilesurfacetileswhichformagridthroughout the underpass structureand help to direct people safelythrough the underpass and acrossadjacentroads
2. Concreteslateswithhigherroughnessto provide walking safety in variousweatherconditions
3. Coloredandspecialreinforcedstep-edges on stairs to provide guidanceandslipresistance
4. Visual separation of sidewalk andbikewayswithcoloredtileorstone
1STSW
4STSW
1STSW
Imageofatactilesysteminunderpassesthatatthesametimeseparatespedestriansandbikers.
X
X
X
47JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.8UNIVERSALDESIGN
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Stairs, ramps, pavements, and railingsencompassed into the underpassstructure should provide a cohesivesolution and a well-designedenvironment for people of all abilities.DesignsolutionsshouldalsorespondtotheclimatevariationsinCalgary.Designelements (All Designs refer toAlbertaBuildingCode2006andCityofCalgaryAccessDesignStandards—Draft2009)shouldinclude:
1. Tactilesurfacetileswhichformagridthroughout the underpass structureand help to direct people safelythrough the underpass and acrossadjacentroads
2. Concreteslateswithhigherroughnessto provide walking safety in variousweatherconditions
3. Coloredandspecialreinforcedstep-edges on stairs to provide guidanceandslipresistance
4. Visual separation of sidewalk andbikewayswithcoloredtileorstone
5. Seamlesstreatmentofcornersituationsandrampstoallowwheelchairandbarrier-freeusagebycurbrampsatintersectionsandcrosswalks
6. Seamlessaccessandaneasytransitionintothebuildingsalongunderpassstreets
7. Handrailsalongsidewalks,rampsandstairswhichareeasytograspandprovideafirmandcomfortablegrip
8. Auditorybrailleatunderpassesandkeyintersections,orGPSBrailleatsidewalksandadjacentbuildings(i.e.,“talkingsidewalk”,“talkingbuildings”)toguidethevisuallychallengedtotransitstopsandsurroundingdestinations
Examples of barrier-free curb solutions including tactilesystems.
Imageofanauditorytactilesystem.
48 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
TheCentreCityPlan identifiesallunderpassesasgateways from and to Downtown.As the majorsouth-northlinkagesbetweentheDowntownandBeltlineneighbourhoods,underpassescanbecomespots where visitors, workers, and residents findinformationandinterpretivefeaturesthattheycanusetoexploreanddiscover.Goodsignagecanplayanimportantroleinsupportingthepublicrealmandcontributingtoadistinctivelocalidentity.Theintenthasbeenconsistentinrecentpolicyworkrelatedtothesubject,includingtheCalgaryDowntownRetailDistrict Strategy (2009) and theAnimated PublicArtReport(2008).ThisGuidelinefocusesprimarilyonthepedestrianrealm.Theintentisto:
•Enhancethegatewayfeaturesofallunderpassesthroughproperpedestriansignage
•Improvethewayfindingandlegibility
•Enrichthepedestrianexperience
Pedestrian Signage 1. Providewayfindingsignagetodirectandorient
pedestrians and cyclists to surrounding keydestinations,aswellasthepublictransitnetworkwhereapplicable.
2. Tomaximizepedestrianfeelalongtheunderpassstreets, encourage pedestrian-scaled retailsignage on canopies and blade retail signageperpendicular to the retail facades comprisingpartofthebuildingfrontages
4.9PEDESTRIANSIGNAGE
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
SampleofUnderpassWayfindingSignage. Sample for directional signage design related to thehistoricalcontext.
49JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
3. Usebrandingsignageatunderpassestoenhancethegatewayfeaturesoftheunderpasses(SeeSection4.1.2BridgeStructure)
4. Usebannerorartsignageasdistinctivefeaturestobeautifythestreets.
5. Wherepossible,considerusinginterpretivesignagetocelebratelocalheritage
6. Installpedestriansignageatappropriatelocations(e.g.retainingwall,lightingpole,balustrade,pavement,storefront,streetcorner,etc.)dependingonthetype,sizeandpotentialimpactofthesignageonpedestrianrealm.Thelocation,sizeanddesignofthesignagemustnotdistractthedriversandoverpoweradjacentstructures.Itmustrespectthescaleandmaterialoftheadjacentstructures,aswellasthestreetscapecharacterofthearea.Itmustnotprotrudeontothesidewalkorobstructthepedestrianflow.
7. Avoidvisualclutterandsignageproliferationthatdetractfromthequalityofthepedestrianrealm.Designthesignagetobepartoftheoverallgraphicsystemfortheunderpassanditssurroundingareatoestablishthevisualcontinuityofthepedestrianrealm.Requireascale,orientationandlevelofdetailthatisdistinctivefromtrafficsignsinordertoimprovelegibilityandavoidconfusionanddistractionfordrivers.
8. Encouragetheuseofcustom-designedsignageaspublicarttoenrichpedestrianexperiencedependingonthelocalcharacterofthearea(seeSection4.11PublicArt).
4.9PEDESTRIANSIGNAGE
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Imageofbannersinunderpasses.
50 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES50
4.9PEDESTRIANSIGNAGE
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
9. Develop free-standing, illuminated,directionalkiosksatappropriatelocations,featuring maps of the Centre Citydestinations combined with newspaper/magazine stands and wayfinding(consistency with Wayfinding Study,Centre City Implementation, 2010)features. Kiosks could also function asspecial structures to pronounce gatewayelements.
10. Animated wayfinding or signage are atthediscretionoftheApprovingAuthority,basedonthelocalcontextoftheunderpassandtheevaluationcriteriadefinedinLandUseBylaw1P2007(Signregulationssuchasapprovalprocedure,location,type,size,lettering,colour,illumination).
SampleofPedestrianSignageandWayfinding
51JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
The nature of underpasses as below gradebuildingsexposes the technical infrastructureandutilitylinesofthecity’sbuildingsandroads.Theexposedutility infrastructureshouldnotcontradictthedesignimprovementspromotedbythisGuideline:
1. Incorporateutilitypipesinnewunderpassesintobridgestructuressothattheyarenotvisible.
2. Visibleutilitypipesatexistingunderpassesshould blend into underpass colour anddesign theme and should be made lessvisible. Stairwells andpedestrianpassagesshould not be bridged by visually openpipelinesorutilitylines.
3. Stormwater pump stations in newunderpasses should become an integralpartoftheunderpassdesign.Pumpstationaccess areas, doors and windows shouldbeintegratedintotheretainingwalldesign.
51
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.10UTILITYINFRASTRUCTUREINTEGRATION
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
12STSW
5STSW
8STSW
Imageofanunderpassstructurewithintegratednon-visibleutilitylinescocealedbylightingelements.
X
52 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES52
4.11UNDERPASSART
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Artinunderpassesisanyworkofartordesignthat is created by an acknowledged artistspecificallytobesitedinapublicspace,orinthe public accessible private space along theunderpass streets. Public art installations areat the discretion of theApprovingAuthority,basedontheCorporatePublicArtPolicy(CPS2009-33)whichoutlines theCity’s artpolicyand encourages art within the pedestrianrealm.Theintentofunderpassartinstallationsisto:
•Givepedestriansadirectorsubconsciousfeelingofcomfortandsafety
• Commemoratespecificeventsandhistoricfigures, to give character to the gatewayfunction into downtown and to establishownershipoftheunderpassrealm.
• Makeliving,workingandvisitingCalgaryaninteresting,thought-provokingandcreativeexperience.
Retainingwallsculptures
Ceilinginstallations
Imageofwallartandmedianartinunderpassesenvironment
53JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. Installunderpassartatstrategic locationsincludingretainingwalls,cornersituations,bridge balustrades, building walls andsetbackareas.Artobjectsshallnotencroachintothesidewalkzone.Animatedartshallnotinterferewithtrafficregulations.
2. Art installations in underpasses could betemporaryorbecomeapermanentpublicfeature.Inbothcasestheoutdoorexhibitsrequire ongoing maintenance due toexposure to theelements,vandalismandpollution.
3. Other underpass art installations can bethe display of artistic features within theunderpasse.g.murals,mosaics,andphotoinstallations.These artistic displays couldbecome a constantly changing sceneryprovided by community groups, schools,and art classes.The available wall spacecanbeturnedintoaninteresting,thought-provokingandcreativeexperience.
4. Allowanimatedwayfindingpublicartonlyat strategic locations (e.g., commercialstreets,majorpublicspaces,entertainmentdistricts), and at the discretion of theApproving Authority, based on the localcontextoftheunderpass.
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4.11UNDERPASSART
4.0 Underpass Design Guidelines
Artinunderpassesisanyworkofartordesignthat is created by an acknowledged artistspecificallytobesitedinapublicspace,orinthe public accessible private space along theunderpass streets. Public art installations areat the discretion of theApprovingAuthority,basedontheCorporatePublicArtPolicy(CPS2009-33)whichoutlines theCity’s artpolicyand encourages art within the pedestrianrealm.Theintentofunderpassartinstallationsisto:
•Givepedestriansadirectorsubconsciousfeelingofcomfortandsafety
• Commemoratespecificeventsandhistoricfigures, to give character to the gatewayfunction into downtown and to establishownershipoftheunderpassrealm.
• Makeliving,workingandvisitingCalgaryaninteresting,thought-provokingandcreativeexperience.
Lightinginstallation Mosaicartinstallationontheretainingwallunderthebridge
TemporaryDisplays Façadeprojection
54 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
5.1IMPLEMENTATION
5.0ImplementationRecommendations
54
A successful implementation of this Guideline requires thecollaborativeworkofbusinessunitsoftheCityofCalgary.Paralleltothiswork,thebuildingofpar tnershipswithkeystakeholderswillbenecessarytoprovideownership.Private Development
The underpass design elements will be implemented through thedevelopmentreviewprocess.Thisappliestoanynewdevelopmentpermitapplicationandrenewalofanexistingdevelopmentpermitapplication along theunderpass street between9Avenue and10Avenue.
City-initiatedpublicimprovementprojectswillbecoordinatedthrough:
• Thebusinessplanningandbudgetcoordinationprocess
• LandUsePlanningandPolicyworkprogram
• Transportationworkprogram
• CentreCityImplementationworkprogram
TheprocessinvolvesCityofCalgaryinternalbusinessunitsaswellsasexternalstakeholderssuchasTourismCalgary,DowntownandBeltlineBusinessAssociations,CPR,theCalgaryStampedeandlandownersalongtheunderpassstreets.
Funding Mechanism
ThisGuidelinetiesintootherongoingLandUsePlanningandPolicyworkprogramincludingnewCM-2bonussystemandCPRspecialareastudy.Bythetimetheseprojectsarecompletedandapprovedby Council, more funding opportunities may have been exploredwithanestablisheddensitybonussystemandaCPRSpecialAreaInvestment Fund. Other funding sources may also be considered(suchasDowntownInvestmentFund,BeltlineCommunityInvestmentFund,etc.),whichcanbedeterminedonacasebycaseorsitebysitebasis.Timing for theunderpass improvementswilldependonCity work programs and priorities as well as on the priorities ofotherstakeholders.Theprioritiesasrecommendedinthefollowingsectionshouldserveasaguideinthedevelopmentoffuturenewunderpassesandexistingunderpassimprovements.
55JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
5.2PRIORITIES
5.0 Implementation Recommendations
55
The following table could be used as a decision-making tool to setpriorities for the implementation of any new underpass and existingunderpassimprovements:
Priorities for New Underpasses
• NP1:newunderpass,alldesignguidelinesapply(Section4.0)
• NP2:proposedunderpassasperCentreCityPlan(2007),alldesignguidelinesapply(Section4.0)
• NP3:potentialunderpass,alldesignguidelinesapply(Section4.0)orities for Existing Underpasses
• EP1:short-termimprovements,relativelylowcost
• EP2:short-termimprovements,mediumcost
• EP3:mid-termimprovements,highcost
Priorities for All Underpasses
• P1:1stpriority P2:2ndpriority P3:3rdpriority
R
ecommendations
Intermsofpriority,twoapproaches(orthecombination)aresuggestedinthisGuideline:
1. Underpass-basedimprovements
• ItmeansdealingwithoneselectedunderpassatatimeandapplyingallmajordesignelementssuggestedinthisGuidelinetothatparticularunderpass.
• 4StreetSE,MacleodTrailSE,1StreetSW,4StreetSW,and8StreetSWareidentifiedasprioritiesforunderpass-basedimprovements.
2. Underpasselement-basedimprovements
• Itmeansdealingwithoneormoreunderpasselementsforafewselectedunderpassesatatime.Thismayinvolvebothelement-basedbasicimprovementsandaestheticupgradesdependingonthefundingavailable.
• Allunderpassesareidentifiedasprioritiesforelement-basedbasicimprovements.
• 4StreetSE,MacleodTrailSE,1StreetSW,4StreetSW,and8StreetSWareidentifiedasprioritiesforelement-basedaestheticupgrades.
56 JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
5.0 Implementation Recommendations
Criteria Priorities
UnderpassOverall Physical Condition
CPP (City Centre Plan) Importance
Pedestrian / cyclist Volume
Priority - All Elements (average)
Priority - All
New Underpasses
4StSE N/A High N/A NP1 P1
2StSW N/A High High NP2 P3
11StSW N/A High Medium NP3 P3
Existing Underpasses
MacLeodTrSE Poor High Low EP1 P1
1StSE Poor Low Medium EP3 P2
1StSW Fair High High EP2 P1
4StSW Poor High High EP2 P1
5StSW Fair High High EP3 P2
8StSW Fair High High EP1 P1
14StSW Poor Low N/A EP2 P2
7StSE Poor Low Low EP3 P2
A1APPENDICES: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Appendices
AppendixA: Glossary................................................................................................A2
AppendixB: UnderpassAnalysis.........................................................................A3
AppendixC: CaseStudy......................................................................................... A63
AppendixD: ProjectCredits................................................................................ A77
A2 APPENDIX A: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Underpass: Passagewayforvehiclesorpedestriansthatrunsunderarailway.Thepassagewayincludesthecompletestreetbodybelowgradebetween9Avenueand10AvenueSE/SW.\
Active Edge: Thebuilding linealong theunderpass sidewalks,which is characterizedbycontinuouspedestrianoriented frontswithwindowanddoorsopentothesidewalk.
Retaining Wall: Wallsthatseparatetheunderpassalongthesidewalkpodiumfromtheadjacentproperties,wallsunderneaththesidewalkpodiumalongthetrafficlanesandwallsunderneaththebridgespan.
Pedestrian Realm: Thepubliclyaccessiblespacebetweenstreetcurbandbuildingline.
Additional Lighting: Illuminatesthestreet,thebridgestructure,retainingwalls,andadjacentbuildingswithluminairesinadditiontothefunctionalstreetlightingtoprovideacomprehensivelylitstreet.
Universal Design: Streetsurfacedesignwhichprovidesaccessforpeopleofallabilities.
Bridge Structure: Structuresupportingtherailwaythatrunsacrossthestreet
Pedestrian Signage: Directsandorientspedestriansandcyclisttosurroundingkeydestinations(e.g.transit,retailareas,publicbuildingsandlocations)inadditiontotrafficsignage.
Public Art: Artinunderpassesisanyworkofartordesignthatiscreatedbyanacknowledgedartistspecificallytobesitedinapublicspace,orinthepublicaccessibleprivatespace
Braille: TheBraillesystemisamethodthatiswidelyusedbyblindpeopletoreadandwrite.Braillewasdevisedin1821byLouisBraille,ablindFrenchman.EachBraillecharacterorcellismadeupofsixdotpositions,arrangedinarectanglecontainingtwocolumnsofthreedotseach.UrbanBrailleisatermusedbyplannersforaBraillesysteminthepublicrealm.
GPS Braille: Afreelyaccessiblesystemwhichsupportsabraillesysteminthepublicrealm.TheGlobalPositioningSystem(GPS)isaspace-basedglobalnavigationsatellitesystemthatprovidesreliablelocationandtimeinformationinallweatherandatalltimesandanywhereonorneartheEarthwherethereisanunobstructedlineofsighttofourormoreGPSsatellites.ItismaintainedbytheUnitedStatesgovernmentandisfreelyaccessiblebyanyonewithaGPSreceiver.
AppendixA:Glossary
A3
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: DRAFT REPORT JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES A3
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
APPENDIX B: DRAFT REPORT JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1.0 7 Street SE Underpasses ......................................................................................................................A4
2.0 4 Street SE Underpass (Under Construction) ..................................................................................A9
3.0 Macleod Trail SE Underpass .................................................................................................................A12
4.0 1 Street SE Underpass ..........................................................................................................................A19
5.0 1 Street SW Underpass .......................................................................................................................A25
6.0 2 Street SW Underpass (Proposed Underpass) ...............................................................................A32
7.0 4 Street SW Underpasses ...................................................................................................................A35
8.0 5 Street SW Underpass .......................................................................................................................A41
9.0 8 Street SW Underpasses ...................................................................................................................A47
10.0 11 Street SW Crossing (Potential Underpass) .................................................................................A53
11.0 14 Street SW Underpass .....................................................................................................................A57
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A4 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1.07STREETSEUNDERPASS
4A
6 1
3
2
5
4
6 7
1.1 Local Context
1235
A5
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Criteria Ref No. Descriptions
Physical
Context
BuiltForm
1
24
• ElbowRiverbridgewithunderpassbuiltin1912with2m/6’6”clearanceforvehiclesandverylowclearanceforpedestriansandbikersalongElbowRiver
• UnderpassforpedestrianandbikersontheEastsideofElbowRiver• Nobuildingsinclosevicinityoftheunderpass• Streetdoesnotaccommodateclearvisibility,whenapproachingunderpass
PedestrianRealm
2,5
37
• Unattractivepedestrianrealmunderneathbridgeduetoverylowbridgeceiling;darknessduringdaytimes
• Singlesidewalkandbike-pathbetweenstreetandElbowRiver• Pedestrianandbikepathcontinuousunderneath9AVSEbridge
RedevelopmentOpportunities A • Cornerlotpotentialon(9AVSEand7Stforcommercialuse)
Linkages 3,7 • Majorregionalmulti-usepathlinkalongElbowRiver
RoadDesign 4,5,6• 2one-waytrafficlanes(clearance,width,andcurveradiidonotfulfillcurrentroad
designstandards)• Vehiclestaller6’6”getstuckfrequentlyunderneathbridge
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• KeyOn-StreetBicycleRoutecrosses9AVSE
1.07STREETSEUNDERPASS
1.2 Context Analysis
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A6 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
BridgeStructure √
Balustrades √
RetainingWalls √
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps(ifany)
√
Medians(none) - - - -
Railings √
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
FunctionalLighting √
ActiveEdges(none) - - - -
AdvancedLighting(none) - - - √
BikeFacilities(none) √
Landscaping √
UniversalDesign(none) - - - √
PedestrianSignage √
UnderpassArts(none) - - - -
1.3 Evaluation Matrix
Design Elements
Evaluation of Existing ConditionsCriteria:SurfacePhysicalImpression,Functionality,Safety,ExistingorNon-existing,StructuralCondition(evaluatedbyCityofCalgary,Roads)
Poor ConditionsImmediateimprovementrequired
Fair ConditionsMayneedsomeimprovement
Good ConditionsMaynotneedimprovementintheshortterm
Not ApplicableCurrentlynon-existingfeatureswhicharestronglyrecommended
1.07STREETSEUNDERPASS
A7
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendedSection No. For Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • Thesteelstructureisinneedofoverallcleaning(graffitiremoval),derustingandpainting. 4.1
Balustrades • Seeabove 4.1
RetainingWalls• Theretainingwallsupportingthebridgestructureneedsabrightpaintwhichshouldbe
renewedfrequently.Therailroaddamneedsadditionalfortificationandlandscapingtopreventgravelanddirtfromslidingontothestreet.
4.2
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps • Norecommendations
Medians • n/a
Railings • Therailingsonbothsidesofthesidewalkarecrockedandneedadjustment 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• n/a
FunctionalLighting • Improvedfunctionallightingtobrightenthebridgerealm 4.4
1.4 Recommendations
1.07STREETSEUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A8 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements Ideas/RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
ActiveEdges • n/a
AdvancedLighting • n/a
BikeFacilities • Maintainoff-streetmulti-usepathwayseparatedfromtrafficlanes 4.5
Landscaping• landscapingofrailroadsteepslopeordamandroadsteepslopesof9AvSEtoenhance
thebridgerealmaspartoftheElbowRiverscenery4.7
UniversalDesign • n/a
PedestrianSignageandUnderpassArts
• Usepedestriansignageatappropriatelocationstodirect,advertiseandtellstories 4.9
1.4 Recommendations
1.07STREETSEUNDERPASS
A9
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1 2
3
6
1
2
3
4
5/6 5
4
2.04STREETSEUNDERPASS(UNDERCONSTRUCTION)
2.1 Local Context
A
B
C
D
EF
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A10 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No.
Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm
12
543
• Adjacenttohistoricalwarehousedistrict• KingEdwardhotelasadesignatedCategoryAbuildingofhistoricalandsocialsignificanceandsite
ofthefutureCantos’sNationalMusicCentre• New“Arriva”buildingasangoodexampleofhigh-densityresidentialdevelopmentinthearea• Manyunder-developedandvacantlands• New“DistrictEnergy”buildingon4StSEand9AveSE
PedestrianRealm5,6
• Unevenpavementanddeterioratingsidewalkqualityinmostareas• High-qualitypedestrianrealm(activeuseatthepodiumlevel,high-qualitypavement,sidewalkwith
trees)at“Arrival”• Lackofpedestrianactivitiesbecauseofthemainlysinglepurposebuildingsandalackofresidential
useinthearea
RedevelopmentOpportunities
B,DAA,E,C
• New“urbanvillage”asenvisionedintheDowntownEastVillageARP• New“Railtown”proposalfortheRemingtonlands• Upcomingconstructionofthenew4thStreetSEUnderpass• CalgaryStampedenew“highstreet”proposalwithavarietyofretailuses,publicspaces,streettreesandon-street
parking• InpartnershipwithCP,theCityplaysanimportantroleinfutureredevelopmentoftheareadirectlyadjacenttothe
proposedunderpassbridge.
Linkages• CloseproximitytotheWarehouseDistrict,StampedeParkandEastVillage• MajortransportationinitiativelinkingEastVillageandCalgaryStampede• Majorsouth-northlinkforpedestriansandcyclists
RoadDesign F
• 2-waytrafficwith4lanes• Potentialclosureof10thAvenue• Provisionofbothon-streetandoff-streetbikefacilities• Incorporationoflandscapingopportunitiesinthemediandesign
As 4 Street SE Underpass is taken as a case study in this Guideline, please refer to Section 5.0 of this Guideline for details.
2.2 Recommendations
2.04STREETSEUNDERPASS(UNDERCONSTRUCTION)
A11
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No.
Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm
12
543
• Adjacenttohistoricalwarehousedistrict• KingEdwardhotelasadesignatedCategoryAbuildingofhistoricalandsocialsignificanceandsite
ofthefutureCantos’sNationalMusicCentre• New“Arriva”buildingasangoodexampleofhigh-densityresidentialdevelopmentinthearea• Manyunder-developedandvacantlands• New“DistrictEnergy”buildingon4StSEand9AveSE
PedestrianRealm5,6
• Unevenpavementanddeterioratingsidewalkqualityinmostareas• High-qualitypedestrianrealm(activeuseatthepodiumlevel,high-qualitypavement,sidewalkwith
trees)at“Arrival”• Lackofpedestrianactivitiesbecauseofthemainlysinglepurposebuildingsandalackofresidential
useinthearea
RedevelopmentOpportunities
B,DAA,E,C
• New“urbanvillage”asenvisionedintheDowntownEastVillageARP• New“Railtown”proposalfortheRemingtonlands• Upcomingconstructionofthenew4thStreetSEUnderpass• CalgaryStampedenew“highstreet”proposalwithavarietyofretailuses,publicspaces,streettreesandon-street
parking• InpartnershipwithCP,theCityplaysanimportantroleinfutureredevelopmentoftheareadirectlyadjacenttothe
proposedunderpassbridge.
Linkages• CloseproximitytotheWarehouseDistrict,StampedeParkandEastVillage• MajortransportationinitiativelinkingEastVillageandCalgaryStampede• Majorsouth-northlinkforpedestriansandcyclists
RoadDesign F
• 2-waytrafficwith4lanes• Potentialclosureof10thAvenue• Provisionofbothon-streetandoff-streetbikefacilities• Incorporationoflandscapingopportunitiesinthemediandesign
As 4 Street SE Underpass is taken as a case study in this Guideline, please refer to Section 5.0 of this Guideline for details.
Ref No.
Descriptions
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• Proposedhigh-speedrailroutealongCPtracks• ProposedSELRTline(atgrade)andLRTstationalongtheCPtracks• 4StreetSEasaPedestrianCorridor,KeyOn-streetBicycleRoute,Pedestrian/RetailStreet• Withincharacterareas—NorthStampedeEntranceWayandhistoricalWarehouseDistrict
2.2 Recommendations
2.04STREETSEUNDERPASS(UNDERCONSTRUCTION)
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A12 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
12345
6
1 2
3 4
5 6
7
7
8
3.0MACLEODTRAILSE
3.1 Local Context
A
8B C
D
E
A13
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No. Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm
• CloseproximitytothespecialplacesincludingtheWarehouseDistrict,StampedePark,StevenAvenue,theMunicipalBuildingandtheOlympicPlazaCulturalDistrict
• New“Keynote”developmentthatisunderconstructionincluding457residentialunits,anofficebuildingandcommercialusesatgrade
PedestrianRealm
2,451,357
86
• Currentlynotahighpedestrianvolumestreet• Rustybridgestructure,balustradesandrailings• Commercialadvertisingatthebalustradefacingtothesouthwherethetrafficcomesfrom• Waterrunoffonretainingwallsespeciallyunderthebridge• Poorlightingconditionsunderthebridge• Highfencingalongprivatepropertiesandthestormwaterpumpstation• visiblegarbageonthestreetandinthelandscapedareas• FunctionaldirectionalsignagetoparkinglotsandFortCalgaryHistoricalPark• Landscapingalongtheparkinglotedgeandsomebuildingsetbackareas
RedevelopmentOpportunities
A,B,C,ED
• Vacantandvirtuallyvacantdevelopablelandssurroundingtheunderpassbridge• Newlyapproved“SkyTower”bringingin220residentialunitsaswellasofficecommercialtothearea
Linkages
• Majorpedestrianlinkagesamongabove-mentionedspecialplaces• MajorgatewaytoDowntownfromsouthpartofthecitywithhightrafficvolume(over20,000vehicles
perday)• Majorsouth-northbusrouteintoDowntown
RoadDesign 6• 4one-waytrafficlanes• NoMedian• Approx.2,4msidewalk
3.0MACLEODTRAILSE
3.2 Context Analysis
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A14 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No.
Descriptions
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• Proposedhigh-speedrailroutealongCPtracks• ProposedSELRTline(atgrade)andLRTstationalongtheCPtracks• 4StreetSEasaPedestrianCorridor,KeyOn-streetBicycleRoute,Pedestrian/RetailStreet• Withincharacterareas—NorthStampedeEntranceWayandhistoricalWarehouseDistrict• Potentiallocationforpublicartattheunderpassbridge
3.2 Context Analysis
3.0MACLEODTRAILSE
A15
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
BridgeStructure √
Balustrades √
RetainingWalls √
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps(ifany)
√
Medians(none) - - - √
Railings √
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
√
FunctionalLighting √
ActiveEdges(none) - - - √
AdvancedLighting(none) - - - √
BikeFacilities(none) - - - √
Landscaping √
UniversalDesign(none) - - - √
PedestrianSignage √
UnderpassArts(none) - - - √
Design Elements
Evaluation of Existing ConditionsCriteria:SurfacePhysicalImpression,Functionality,Safety,ExistingorNon-existing,StructuralCondition(evaluatedbyCityofCalgary,Roads)
Poor ConditionsImmediateimprovementrequired
Fair ConditionsMayneedsomeimprovement
Good ConditionsMaynotneedimprovementintheshortterm
Not ApplicableCurrentlynon-existingfeatureswhicharestronglyrecommended
3.3 Evaluation Matrix
3.0MACLEODTRAILSE
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A16 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • Newpaintingrequired 4.1
Balustrades• Newpaintingrequired• Discouragecommercialadvertisingonbalustrades• Brandingopportunitiesonbalustrades
4.1
RetainingWalls
• Embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewalls• Usewaterproofsolutionstoavoidwaterrunoffonretainingwalls• Encourage“green”retainingwalls• Considerusingdurable,easytoclean,graffiti-proofmaterials• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay• Useceramictilestocreatemosaicartonthewalls• Whereapplicable,providesurfaceforcomfortablesittingatthelowerportionoftheretainingwalls
4.2
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps• Addsidewalkstonorthsideof10Avenue• Cleartheclutters(lightingpoles,garbagecans,etc.)atthecorners• Usedurable,high-qualitypavementforsidewalks
4.54.8
Medians• DuetolimitedroadRight-of-waywidth(about20.1m)andrequirementsfor4trafficlanes(13.4m),thereis
nospaceforamedianundercurrentconditions4.6
Railings • Newrailingstoreplacetherustedones 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Cleanupthevisiblegarbage• Discouragefencingaroundprivateproperties• Maximizelandscapingopportunitiesatthesetbackareas
4.74.3
FunctionalLighting • Requirenewlightingtobrightentheareaunderthebridge 4.4
3.4 Recommendations
3.0MACLEODTRAILSE
A17
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • Newpaintingrequired 4.1
Balustrades• Newpaintingrequired• Discouragecommercialadvertisingonbalustrades• Brandingopportunitiesonbalustrades
4.1
RetainingWalls
• Embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewalls• Usewaterproofsolutionstoavoidwaterrunoffonretainingwalls• Encourage“green”retainingwalls• Considerusingdurable,easytoclean,graffiti-proofmaterials• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay• Useceramictilestocreatemosaicartonthewalls• Whereapplicable,providesurfaceforcomfortablesittingatthelowerportionoftheretainingwalls
4.2
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps• Addsidewalkstonorthsideof10Avenue• Cleartheclutters(lightingpoles,garbagecans,etc.)atthecorners• Usedurable,high-qualitypavementforsidewalks
4.54.8
Medians• DuetolimitedroadRight-of-waywidth(about20.1m)andrequirementsfor4trafficlanes(13.4m),thereis
nospaceforamedianundercurrentconditions4.6
Railings • Newrailingstoreplacetherustedones 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Cleanupthevisiblegarbage• Discouragefencingaroundprivateproperties• Maximizelandscapingopportunitiesatthesetbackareas
4.74.3
FunctionalLighting • Requirenewlightingtobrightentheareaunderthebridge 4.4
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
ActiveEdges• Requireactiveusebuildingfrontagesalongthestreetforallnewdevelopments• Whereveropportunitiesexist,renovateexistingbuildingstoopendoorsandwindowsfacingtothestreetand
provideactiveedgesalongthestreet4.3
AdvancedLighting• Consideradvancedlightingoftrafficlanes,bridgestructure,balustrades,retainingwalls,foliageandbuilding
facadestoenhancepedestrianexperience4.4
BikeFacilities • Providemulti-usepathwayalongeastsideofthestreet 4.5
Landscaping
• DuetolimitedroadRight-of-waywidth(about20.1m)andrequirementsfor4trafficlanes(13.4m),thereisnotenoughspaceinthepublicdomainforaminimum1.5mtree/planter/flowerbedandfurnishingzonewhilemaintaininga3mwideclearpedestrianzone,unless:
• A5.182msetbackonbothsidesofthestreet(tobeconsistenttotheBylawsetbackrequirements)isrequiredforthefirstlevelofanynewdevelopmentalongthestreet,whichwillwidenthepedestrianrealmandtransformthestreetintoaboulevardstreetscapecharacter
4.5
4.7
UniversalDesign• Asafuturehighpedestrianvolumestreet,thedesignofthesidewalkmustprovidefullaccessforthephysically
challengedincludingthevisuallychallenged4.8
PedestrianSignage • Usepedestriansignageatappropriatelocationstodirect,advertiseandtellstories 4.9
UnderpassArts• Underpassartsatthebalustrades,theretainingwalls,orembeddedinthesidewalks• Underpassartsatappropriatelocationssuchasbuildingsetbackareas,corners,furnishingandtreezones• Underpassartsasthestorytellingfeaturetocelebratelocalhistory
4.11
3.4 Recommendations
3.0MACLEODTRAILSE
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A18 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
AlthoughMacleodTrailSEunderpasscurrentlyhaslowpedestrianvolumeandhighvehiculartrafficvolume,theunderpassanditssurroundingareashouldbeontheprioritylistforfutureimprovements,consideringitshighimportanceinimplementingthevisionsoftheCentreCityPlanandtheBeltlineARP.Inthelongterm,itwillbetransformedintoapedestrian-orientedareawithhigh-qualitypublicrealmandprivatedevelopments.
DesignelementsoftheproposedMacLeodTrailmajorroadconstructionproject(Planningphasein2009)between7Stand8STshouldcorrelatetothefutureunderpassredesign..
3.0MACLEODTRAILSE
3.4 Recommendations
A19
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.1 Local Context
4.01STREETSEUNDERPASS
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
A 6
12347
5
8
B
C
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A20 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No. Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm5 • CloseproximitytothespecialplacesincludingtheWarehouseDistrict,theOlympicPlaza,StevenAvenue,
andCalgaryTower.New“PalliserSouth”(10/11)and“PalliserSquare”(14)officedevelopmentsareunderconstruction.
PedestrianRealm
• Currentlynotahighpedestrianvolumestreet• Crackedsidewalkpavement• Highconcreteretainingwallsalongprivatepropertieswithuntreatedsurface• Rustybridgestructure,balustradesandrailings• Commercialadvertisingatthebalustradefacingtothenorthwherethetrafficcomesfrom• Waterrunoffonretainingwallsespeciallyunderthebridge;litter• Poorlightingconditionsunderthebridge• Highfencingalongprivateproperties• Directionalsignage(stand-alonekiosk)toparkinglotsandparkadesonprivateproperties• Fewlandscapingalongtheparkinglotedgeandbuildingsetbackareas• Blueandorangepaintfoundontheportionofthebridgestructurearoundpedestrianrealm• Clutters(garbagecans,lightingpoles,parkingmachines)atstreetcorners
RedevelopmentOpportunities
ABC
• Largevacantdevelopablelandsatthesoutheastcorneroftheunderpassbridge• Newlyapproved“SkyTower”willbringin220residentialunitsandofficecommercialtothearea• Newlyapproved(landuseapplication)“MustardSeed”willbringin407residentialunitstothearea
Linkages• GatewayfromDowntowntosouthpartofthecitywithhightrafficvolumeMajorsouth-northbusrouteinto
Downtown• Nophysicalorvisuallinkbetweenthepublicaccessibleprivatelyownedcornerparkat9Avenueand1StreetSE
RoadDesign• 4one-waytrafficlanes• NoMedian
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• Proposedhigh-speedrailroutealongCPtracks• ProposedSELRTline(undergroundtoabove-gradetransitionarea)alongtheCPtracks• 1StreetSEasaMajorBusRoute,ProposedKeyOn-streetBicycleRoute,withBoulevardstreetscapecharacters• Withincharacterareas—historicalWarehouseDistrict• Potentiallocationforartattheunderpassbridge
4.1 Context Analysis
4.01STREETSEUNDERPASS
1,54,527
148
3
A21
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No. Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm5 • CloseproximitytothespecialplacesincludingtheWarehouseDistrict,theOlympicPlaza,StevenAvenue,
andCalgaryTower.New“PalliserSouth”(10/11)and“PalliserSquare”(14)officedevelopmentsareunderconstruction.
PedestrianRealm
• Currentlynotahighpedestrianvolumestreet• Crackedsidewalkpavement• Highconcreteretainingwallsalongprivatepropertieswithuntreatedsurface• Rustybridgestructure,balustradesandrailings• Commercialadvertisingatthebalustradefacingtothenorthwherethetrafficcomesfrom• Waterrunoffonretainingwallsespeciallyunderthebridge;litter• Poorlightingconditionsunderthebridge• Highfencingalongprivateproperties• Directionalsignage(stand-alonekiosk)toparkinglotsandparkadesonprivateproperties• Fewlandscapingalongtheparkinglotedgeandbuildingsetbackareas• Blueandorangepaintfoundontheportionofthebridgestructurearoundpedestrianrealm• Clutters(garbagecans,lightingpoles,parkingmachines)atstreetcorners
RedevelopmentOpportunities
ABC
• Largevacantdevelopablelandsatthesoutheastcorneroftheunderpassbridge• Newlyapproved“SkyTower”willbringin220residentialunitsandofficecommercialtothearea• Newlyapproved(landuseapplication)“MustardSeed”willbringin407residentialunitstothearea
Linkages• GatewayfromDowntowntosouthpartofthecitywithhightrafficvolumeMajorsouth-northbusrouteinto
Downtown• Nophysicalorvisuallinkbetweenthepublicaccessibleprivatelyownedcornerparkat9Avenueand1StreetSE
RoadDesign• 4one-waytrafficlanes• NoMedian
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• Proposedhigh-speedrailroutealongCPtracks• ProposedSELRTline(undergroundtoabove-gradetransitionarea)alongtheCPtracks• 1StreetSEasaMajorBusRoute,ProposedKeyOn-streetBicycleRoute,withBoulevardstreetscapecharacters• Withincharacterareas—historicalWarehouseDistrict• Potentiallocationforartattheunderpassbridge
BridgeStructure √
RetainingWalls √
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps(ifany)
√
Medians(none) - - - √
Railings √
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
√
FunctionalLighting √
ActiveEdges(none) √PalliserSouth √
AdvancedLighting(none) - - - √
BikeFacilities(none) - - - √
Landscaping √
UniversalDesign(none) - - - √
PedestrianSignage √
UnderpassArts(none) - - - √
4.2 Evaluation Matrix
Design Elements
Evaluation of Existing ConditionsCriteria:SurfacePhysicalImpression,Functionality,Safety,ExistingorNon-existing,StructuralCondition(evaluatedbyCityofCalgary,Roads)
Poor ConditionsImmediateimprovementrequired
Fair ConditionsMayneedsomeimprovement
Good ConditionsMaynotneedimprovementintheshortterm
Not ApplicableCurrentlynon-existingfeatureswhicharestronglyrecommended
4.01STREETSEUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A22 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • Newcoordinatedpaintingrequiredforallstructureelements 4.1
Balustrades• Newpaintingrequired• Discouragecommercialadvertisingonbalustrades• Brandingopportunitiesonbalustrades
4.1
RetainingWalls
• Embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewalls• Usewaterproofsolutionstoavoidwaterrunoffonretainingwalls• Encourage“layered”and“green”retainingwalls• Considerusingdurable,easytoclean,graffiti-proofmaterials• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay• Useceramictilestocreatemosaicartonthewalls• Whereapplicable,providesurfaceforcomfortablesittingatthelowerportionoftheretainingwalls
4.2
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps
• Addsidewalkstonorthsideof10Avenue• Cleartheclutters(lightingpoles,garbagecans,etc.)atthecorners• Replacecrackedconcretesidewalkswithnewones
4.54.8
Medians• DuetolimitedroadRight-of-waywidth(about20.1m)andrequirementsfor4trafficlanes(13.4m),thereis
nospaceforamedianundercurrentcondition4.6
Railings • Newrailingstoreplacetherustedones 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Cleanupthevisiblegarbage• Discouragefencingaroundprivateproperties• Maximizelandscapingopportunitiesatthesetbackareas
4.34.7
FunctionalLighting • Requirenewlightingtobrightentheareaunderthebridge 4.4
4.3 Recommendations
4.01STREETSEUNDERPASS
A23
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • Newcoordinatedpaintingrequiredforallstructureelements 4.1
Balustrades• Newpaintingrequired• Discouragecommercialadvertisingonbalustrades• Brandingopportunitiesonbalustrades
4.1
RetainingWalls
• Embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewalls• Usewaterproofsolutionstoavoidwaterrunoffonretainingwalls• Encourage“layered”and“green”retainingwalls• Considerusingdurable,easytoclean,graffiti-proofmaterials• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay• Useceramictilestocreatemosaicartonthewalls• Whereapplicable,providesurfaceforcomfortablesittingatthelowerportionoftheretainingwalls
4.2
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps
• Addsidewalkstonorthsideof10Avenue• Cleartheclutters(lightingpoles,garbagecans,etc.)atthecorners• Replacecrackedconcretesidewalkswithnewones
4.54.8
Medians• DuetolimitedroadRight-of-waywidth(about20.1m)andrequirementsfor4trafficlanes(13.4m),thereis
nospaceforamedianundercurrentcondition4.6
Railings • Newrailingstoreplacetherustedones 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Cleanupthevisiblegarbage• Discouragefencingaroundprivateproperties• Maximizelandscapingopportunitiesatthesetbackareas
4.34.7
FunctionalLighting • Requirenewlightingtobrightentheareaunderthebridge 4.4
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
ActiveEdges• Requireactiveusebuildingfrontagesalongthestreetforallnewdevelopments• Whereveropportunitiesexist,renovateexistingbuildingstoopendoorsandwindowsfacingtothestreet
andprovideactiveedgesalongthestreet4.3
AdvancedLighting• Consideradvancedlightingoftrafficlanes,bridgestructure,balustrades,retainingwalls,foliageandbuilding
facadestoenhancepedestrianexperience4.4
BikeFacilities • Providemulti-usepathwayalongwestsideofthestreet 4.5
Landscaping
• DuetolimitedroadRight-of-waywidth(about20.1m)andrequirementsfor4trafficlanes(13.4m),thereisnotenoughspaceinthepublicdomainforaminimum1.5mtreeandfurnishingzonewhilemaintaininga3mwideclearpedestrianzone,unless:
• A5.182msetbackonbothsidesofthestreet(tobeconsistenttotheBylawsetbackrequirements)isrequiredforthefirstlevelofanynewdevelopmentalongthestreet,whichwillwidenthepedestrianrealmandtransformthestreetintoaboulevardstreetscapecharacter
4.34.7
UniversalDesign• Thedesignofthesidewalkmustprovidefullaccessforthephysicallychallengedincludingthevisually
challenged4.8
PedestrianSignage • Usepedestriansignageatappropriatelocationstodirect,advertiseandtellstories 4.9
UnderpassArts• Underpassartsatthebalustrades,theretainingwalls,orembeddedinthesidewalks• Underpassartsatappropriatelocationssuchasbuildingsetbackareas,corners,furnishingandtreezones• Underpassartsasthestorytellingfeaturetocelebratelocalhistory
4.11
4.3 Recommendations
4.01STREETSEUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A24 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1StreetSEunderpasscurrentlyhashighvehiculartrafficvolumebutlowpedestrianvolume.Therefore,themainfocusoftheunderpassanditssurroundingareaimprovementsintheshorttermshouldbeonbasicelementsandpoor/fairconditionsascheckedintheEvaluationMatrix.Inthelongterm,newdesignfeaturesasrecommendedheremaybeapplied.
Therecentdevelopmentonthecornerof1StreetSEand10Ave(seePicture6)issettingagoodexampleforintegratingthepublicandprivaterealm..
4.01STSTREETSEUNDERPASS
4.3 Recommendations
A25
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
5.01STREETSWUNDERPASS
5.1 Local Context
5
4
6
1 2
5
3
6
4
1,2,3
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A26 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No. Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm23
6
• CloseproximitytospecialplacesincludingtheWarehouseDistrict,CentralMemorialPark,andHaultainPark;newofficeandcommercialdevelopmentsareunderconstructionincludingHomburgHarrisCentre,BankersCourt,GrenvilleGermainComplex,andPalliserSquareRedevelopment
• AheritageunderpasslocatedattheoldCPRtrainstation,andsurroundedbyanumberofheritagebuildingsalongthestreet
• Thedomestructureat+15levelextendinghistoricFairmountPalliserHotelacross1StreetSWprovidesarecognizableimageofthearea
• PalliserHotelprovidesactiveedgefrontagewithit’sbasementdoorsandwindows
PedestrianRealm
2
1
1
312
• Averyhighpedestrianvolumestreet• Crackedsidewalkcondition,unevenconcretepadsatthecorner,whichmakeitdifficultforpedestrians
especiallythephysicallychallenged.• ThecommemorativeCPRtrainsculpturesattachedontheretainingwallsunderneaththebridgestructure
areuniquefeaturesthatenhancethepedestrianexperienceinthearea.• Visiblewaterrunoffonretainingwallsunderneaththebridge;Catchbasininthemiddleofsidewalk.• Specialdesignedrailingsconsistenttotheoverallheritagetraintheme.• Poorlightingconditionsunderthebridge.• Poormaintenances-rustyrailings,graffiti,dustytrainsculpture,etc.• Newdevelopmentalongwestsideofthestreetshowssomeeffortsinimprovingthebuildinginterfaceby
openingdoorsatsidewalklevel,specialfaçadetreatmentsandcornertreatmentsatthe9thAVinterface.However,noactiveuseiscurrentlyprovidedtoenhancepedestrianexperience.
• Landscapingalongtheparkinglotedgeandsomebuildingsetbackareas.
RedevelopmentOpportunities
A • Vacantdevelopablelandatsouthwestcorneroftheunderpassbridge,whichiscurrentlyasurfaceparkinglot.
Linkages• MajorpedestrianlinkagesbetweenDowntownandeastpartoftheBeltline.• MajorpedestrianandbicyclelinkbetweentheBowRiverandtheElbowRiverpathwaysystems.
RoadDesign• 4two-waytrafficlanes• NoMedian
5.2 Context Analysis
5.01STREETSWUNDERPASS
A27
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No. Descriptions
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• ProposedSELRTline(undergroundportion)alongtheCPtracks• 1StreetSWasaPedestrianCorridor,MajorBusRoute,KeyOn-streetBicycleRoute,withHighStreet
streetscapecharacters• Withincharacterareas—historicalWarehouseDistrict• 1StreetSWastheProposedNeighbourhoodCentrefortheneighbourhoodofVictoriaCrossingCentre.• Potentiallocationforpublicartattheunderpassbridge
5.01STREETSWUNDERPASS
5.2 Context Analysis
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A28 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Bridge Structure √
Balustrades √
RetainingWalls √
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps(ifany) √
Medians(none) - - - √
Railings √
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
√
FunctionalLighting √
ActiveEdges(none) √
AdvancedLighting(none) - - - √
BikeFacilities(none) - - - √
Landscaping √
UniversalDesign(none) - - - √
PedestrianSignage √
UnderpassArts(none) √
5.3 Evaluation Matrix
Design Elements
Evaluation of Existing ConditionsCriteria:SurfacePhysicalImpression,Functionality,Safety,ExistingorNon-existing,StructuralCondition(evaluatedbyCityofCalgary,Roads)
Poor ConditionsImmediateimprovementrequired
Fair ConditionsMayneedsomeimprovement
Good ConditionsMaynotneedimprovementintheshortterm
Not ApplicableCurrentlynon-existingfeatureswhicharestronglyrecommended
5.01STREETSWUNDERPASS
A29
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Bridge Structure √
Balustrades √
RetainingWalls √
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps(ifany) √
Medians(none) - - - √
Railings √
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
√
FunctionalLighting √
ActiveEdges(none) √
AdvancedLighting(none) - - - √
BikeFacilities(none) - - - √
Landscaping √
UniversalDesign(none) - - - √
PedestrianSignage √
UnderpassArts(none) √
Design Elements
Evaluation of Existing ConditionsCriteria:SurfacePhysicalImpression,Functionality,Safety,ExistingorNon-existing,StructuralCondition(evaluatedbyCityofCalgary,Roads)
Poor ConditionsImmediateimprovementrequired
Fair ConditionsMayneedsomeimprovement
Good ConditionsMaynotneedimprovementintheshortterm
Not ApplicableCurrentlynon-existingfeatureswhicharestronglyrecommended
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • Newpaintingrequired 4.1
Balustrades• Newpaintingrequired• Discouragecommercialadvertisingonbalustrades• Brandingopportunitiesonbalustrades
4.1
RetainingWalls• Usewaterproofsolutionstoavoidwaterrunoffonretainingwalls• Considerusingdurable,easytoclean,graffiti-proofsurfacematerials(e.g.,ceramictiles)andembedded
lightingfeaturestoenhancetheheritagetrainsculpturesattachedtothewalls4.2
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps
• Addsidewalkstonorthsideof10Avenue• Cleartheclutters(lightingpoles,garbagecans,etc.)atthecorners• Sidewalkimprovementatcornerstoensureaccessibilityandsafety• Usedurable,high-qualitypavementforsidewalks
4.5
4.8
Medians• DuetolimitedroadRight-of-waywidth(about20.1m)andrequirementsfor4trafficlanes(13.4m),
thereisnospaceforamedianundercurrentconditions4.6
Railings • Newpaintingrequired 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Cleanupthevisiblegarbage• Discouragefencingaroundprivateproperties• Maximizelandscapingopportunitiesatthesetbackareas
4.3
4.7
FunctionalLighting • Requirenewlightingtobrightentheareaunderthebridge 4.4
5.4 Recommendations
5.01STREETSWUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A30 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
ActiveEdges• Requireactiveusebuildingfrontagesalongthestreetforallnewdevelopments• Whereveropportunitiesexist,renovate/reconfigureexistingbuildingstoopendoorsandwindowsfacing
tothestreetandprovideactiveuses4.3
AdvancedLighting• Consideradvancedlightingoftrafficlanes,bridgestructure,balustrades,retainingwalls,foliageandbuilding
facadestoenhancepedestrianexperience• Useseasonallightingtoenhancepedestrianexperience
4.4
BikeFacilities • Duetothenarrownessofthestreet,sharedtravellanes(on-streetbikefacilities)areproposed 4.5
Landscaping• Landscaping(tree,flowerbed,andfurnishingzone)shouldbeprovidedinthe2.134msetbackzoneforat
leastthefirstlevelofanynewdevelopment4.7
4.3
UniversalDesign• Asahighpedestrianvolumestreet,thedesignofthesidewalkmustprovidefullaccessforthephysically
challengedincludingthevisuallychallenged4.8
PedestrianSignage • Usepedestriansignageatappropriatelocationstodirect,advertiseandtellstories 4.9
UnderpassArts• Underpassartsatthebalustrades,theretainingwalls,orembeddedinthesidewalks• Underpassartsatappropriatelocationssuchasbuildingsetbackareas,corners,furnishingandtreezones• Underpassartsasthestorytellingfeaturetocelebratelocalhistory
4.11
5.01STREETSWUNDERPASS
5.4 Recommendations
A31
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
ActiveEdges• Requireactiveusebuildingfrontagesalongthestreetforallnewdevelopments• Whereveropportunitiesexist,renovate/reconfigureexistingbuildingstoopendoorsandwindowsfacing
tothestreetandprovideactiveuses4.3
AdvancedLighting• Consideradvancedlightingoftrafficlanes,bridgestructure,balustrades,retainingwalls,foliageandbuilding
facadestoenhancepedestrianexperience• Useseasonallightingtoenhancepedestrianexperience
4.4
BikeFacilities • Duetothenarrownessofthestreet,sharedtravellanes(on-streetbikefacilities)areproposed 4.5
Landscaping• Landscaping(tree,flowerbed,andfurnishingzone)shouldbeprovidedinthe2.134msetbackzoneforat
leastthefirstlevelofanynewdevelopment4.7
4.3
UniversalDesign• Asahighpedestrianvolumestreet,thedesignofthesidewalkmustprovidefullaccessforthephysically
challengedincludingthevisuallychallenged4.8
PedestrianSignage • Usepedestriansignageatappropriatelocationstodirect,advertiseandtellstories 4.9
UnderpassArts• Underpassartsatthebalustrades,theretainingwalls,orembeddedinthesidewalks• Underpassartsatappropriatelocationssuchasbuildingsetbackareas,corners,furnishingandtreezones• Underpassartsasthestorytellingfeaturetocelebratelocalhistory
4.11
1StreetSWunderpasscurrentlyhasahighconcentrationofpedestrianmovement.Theunderpassanditssurroundingareashouldbeonthehighprioritylistforfutureimprovements.ItwillbetransformedtoahighstreetasenvisionedintheCentreCityPlan.Thepedestrianrealm,especiallytheinterfacezoneshouldaccommodateafullrangeofactivitiesfromretailtohospitality(patios)aswellasotheractivities.Thethemeoftheunderpassimprovementshouldbuildonitsexistinghistoriccharacterandtraditionalstyleofamainstreet.
5.01STREETSWUNDERPASS
5.4 Recommendations
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A32 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
6. 2 Street SW (underpass (proposed)
6.1 Local Context
6.02STREETUNDERPASS(PROPOSED)
1 2
3 4
5 6
4/5
2
3
1/6
A33
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
6.2 Context Analysis
Ref No.
Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm
4 • CloseproximitytothespecialplacesincludingStevenAvenueandBarclayMalltothenorth,CentralMemorialParkandHaultainParktothesouth,andtheWarehouseDistrict.
• LocatedintheheartoftheCentreCity,incloseproximitytomajorbusinesses,entertainmentandculturalamenities.
• NewofficecommercialdevelopmentsareunderconstructionincludingHomburgHarrisCentreandBankersCourt.
PedestrianRealm
2,5,6 • Ahugerampstructurelocatedattheendpointof2StreetSWinbetween9AvenueandtheCPRtracksfunctionsasamainvehicularaccesstotheGulfCanadaParkadefrom9thAvenue.Thereiscurrentlynopedestrianlinkcrossingthetraintracks.
RedevelopmentOpportunities
1
• TheCentreCityPlanhasidentified2StreetSWbetween9Avenueand10AvenueasthepotentiallocationforaMulti-modalTransit“Station”,whichconsistsof:
• “Multi-level(at-grade,underground,+15and+30)interconnectedandclimate-controlledinterfacepointsbetweentheCPRtrain,SElegoftheLRTon10AvenueS,CalgaryTransit(busesandLRT)on9and10AvenueS,future8AvenueSandexistingTransitMallon7AvenueS.”
• Anewunderpass-2StreetSWUnderpasswillbeintegratedintotheproposedMulti-modalTransit“Station”.• Vacantdevelopablelandatsoutheastcornerofthefutureunderpassbridge,whichiscurrentlyasurfaceparking
lot.
Linkages4 • PotentialmajorpedestrianandbicyclelinkagesbetweenDowntownandBeltline.
• PotentialmajorpedestrianandbicyclelinkbetweentheBowRiverandtheElbowRiverpathwaysystems.
RoadDesign5,6 • Potentialspaceforbike-lanesandwidesidewalks
• Potential2one-waytrafficlanes
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
1 • ProposedMulti-modalTransit“Station”• ProposedSELRTline(undergroundportion)alongtheCPtracks• 2StreetSWasaPedestrianCorridor,KeyOn-streetBicycleRoute• Withincharacterareas—historicalWarehouseDistrict• Closetofuture8AvenueSubway• 2StreetSWasaHighPedestrianMovementStreet
6.02STREETUNDERPASS(PROPOSED)
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A34 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Consideringthecomplexityoftheprojectthatinvolvesmajorinfrastructureinvestmentandpublic/privatepartnerships,furtherstudiesarerequiredtoensurethealignmentsofalltheinitiativesandproposalssothattheoverallvisionofaMulti-modalTransit“Station”canberealizedinthefuture.DetailedguidelinesaslistedinSection4.0shouldbeapplieddependingonthesituation.Asaruleofthumb,thefollowingpointsarehighlightedtoguidethedecision-makingprocessrelatedtothedesignofthisparticularfutureunderpassanditssurroundingdevelopments:
• AccordingtoarecentstudyundertakenbytheCity’sTransportationDepartment,2StreetSWcomparingtootherDowntownstreetshasthehighest16-hourinboundbikevolumes.Thereforeitiscrucialtointegratebikefacilitiesintothefutureunderpassdesign:
• Provideoff-streetmulti-usepathwayallalong2StreetSWatthesidewalklevelastheprimaryhorizontallinktotheriverpathwaysystem;oralternatively,provideon-streetseparatedbikelanes.
• Provideconvenientbikeparking(Class1BikeParking)andhorizontalandverticalbikeaccesstoanynewtransitstation(atgrade,underground),aswellastheinsideofthetrainstoencouragetheuseofpublictransit.
• Thefuturemulti-levelstructure(themulti-modaltransit“station”)shouldbecomeadynamictransithubofbothhorizontalandverticalconnectionswherepeoplefromalloverthecitycomeandgo-takingpublictransit,transferringtoanothertransitline,ridingbikestotheriverpathwaysystem,orsimplywalkingtotheirdestinations.Asapeoplegatheringplace,somesupportiveretailuses(e.g.,smallrestaurants,shops,newspaperandmagazinestores)atalllevels(underground,at-grade,+15,and+30)arenecessaryandtheyhavegreatpotentialtosustainandthrive.
• Alltheentrypointstothemulti-modaltransit“Station”shouldbevisible,accessibleforall.
• SincebothfutureSELRTon10AvenueSandfuture8AvenueSubwaywillbeunderground,itwouldbepossibletoworkwithCPandotherpropertyownersregardingprovisionofbelow-gradeplazasandshopsunderthetracksandpedestrian/bikeaccesspointsrightunderneaththefutureunderpassbridgeintegratedwiththemulti-level“Station”.
• Usestreetcornersasthekeyentrancestothe“Station”.Someinnovativedesignsolutionsshouldbeconsideredtodesignthecornersasthefocalpointsofthepublicrealmsystem(e.g.arecessedareaatthecornerforakiosk,asunkenplazasurroundedbybelow-gradeshopswithdirectlinkstotheundergroundtransitstations).
6.3 Recommendations
6.02STREETUNDERPASS(PROPOSED)
A35
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
7.1 Local Context
7.04STREETSWUNDERPASS
1
4
2
3
5 6
6
3
1/2
4
5 BA
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A36 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No. Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm4 • 1955bridgestructures(CPRand9AvSWcrossing),surroundedbyhigh-densityofficeandparkadeon
eastsideandnewretailandoffice(underconstruction)onwestsideofunderpass
PedestrianRealm
1,2,4
6
14
56
• darkandnarrowpedestrianrealmunderneathbothbridges;unlitsituationevenindaylight;nospaceavailabletoallowbiking
• Noactiveedgeconditionsalongretainingwallsonbothsideofunderpass;greycoloredwallsprovidinguninvitingenvironment
• Blackframe-effectunderneathbothbridges;• opportunityofcreateanewactiveedgebyopeninguptheretainingwallborderingthe8Av
constructionsite• Narrowmedian(<2metres)withraisedconcrete• Narrowstairwellsleadingfrom10Avdowntounderpass;insufficientforpeoplewithphysicalhandicaps;
uncomfortablerealmafterdark
RedevelopmentOpportunities
AB4
• Cornerlots(presentuses:surfaceparking)on8and9AveSWoffersavarietyofdevelopmentsolutionsandopportunitiestocreateactiveedgealong5thunderpass;bridgingopportunityutilizingCPRair-space
Linkages • MajorpedestrianlinkagewithhighfrequencybetweenBeltline,StephenAve.Mall,andEatonCentre,
Road Design• 4one-waytrafficlanes• 2.0metre/6.5feetmedian• <2.0metre/<6.5feetsidewalk
Policy Context
Centre City Plan Beltline ARP
• Majorbusroute• Pedestriancorridor
7.2 Context Analysis
7.04STREETSWUNDERPASS
A37
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No. Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm4 • 1955bridgestructures(CPRand9AvSWcrossing),surroundedbyhigh-densityofficeandparkadeon
eastsideandnewretailandoffice(underconstruction)onwestsideofunderpass
PedestrianRealm
1,2,4
6
14
56
• darkandnarrowpedestrianrealmunderneathbothbridges;unlitsituationevenindaylight;nospaceavailabletoallowbiking
• Noactiveedgeconditionsalongretainingwallsonbothsideofunderpass;greycoloredwallsprovidinguninvitingenvironment
• Blackframe-effectunderneathbothbridges;• opportunityofcreateanewactiveedgebyopeninguptheretainingwallborderingthe8Av
constructionsite• Narrowmedian(<2metres)withraisedconcrete• Narrowstairwellsleadingfrom10Avdowntounderpass;insufficientforpeoplewithphysicalhandicaps;
uncomfortablerealmafterdark
RedevelopmentOpportunities
AB4
• Cornerlots(presentuses:surfaceparking)on8and9AveSWoffersavarietyofdevelopmentsolutionsandopportunitiestocreateactiveedgealong5thunderpass;bridgingopportunityutilizingCPRair-space
Linkages • MajorpedestrianlinkagewithhighfrequencybetweenBeltline,StephenAve.Mall,andEatonCentre,
Road Design• 4one-waytrafficlanes• 2.0metre/6.5feetmedian• <2.0metre/<6.5feetsidewalk
Policy Context
Centre City Plan Beltline ARP
• Majorbusroute• Pedestriancorridor
BridgeStructure √
Balustrades √
RetainingWalls √
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps(ifany)
√ √
Railings √ √
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
√
FunctionalLighting √
ActiveEdges(none) - - - √
AdvancedLighting(none) - - - √
BikeFacilities(none) - - - √
Landscaping(none) - - √
UniversalDesign(none) - - - √
PedestrianSignage(none) - - - √
UnderpassArts(none) - - √
Design Elements
Evaluation of Existing ConditionsCriteria:SurfacePhysicalImpression,Functionality,Safety,ExistingorNon-existing,StructuralCondition(evaluatedbyCityofCalgary,Roads)
Poor ConditionsImmediateimprovementrequired
Fair ConditionsMayneedsomeimprovement
Good ConditionsMaynotneedimprovementintheshortterm
Not ApplicableCurrentlynon-existingfeatureswhicharestronglyrecommended
7.3 Evaluation Matrix
7.04STREETSWUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A38 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • norecommendations 4.1
Balustrades • embedlightingfixturestoenhancebalustrade 4.1
RetainingWalls• embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewallsunderneathbridgestructure• Encourage“green”retainingwallsaspartofdevelopments• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay
4.4
4.7
4.11
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps • overallimprovementofstairwells;considerliftto9AvSW 4.8
Medians• entertainmedianupgradewithe.g.verticalartisticelements,medianlightingfeatures• norecommendations
4.6
Railings • Replacerailingwithnewdesignedrailing 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• norecommendations 4.3
FunctionalLighting • installstreetlightingonmedian4.4
4.6
7.4 Recommendations
7.04STREETSWUNDERPASS
A39
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • norecommendations 4.1
Balustrades • embedlightingfixturestoenhancebalustrade 4.1
RetainingWalls• embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewallsunderneathbridgestructure• Encourage“green”retainingwallsaspartofdevelopments• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay
4.4
4.7
4.11
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps • overallimprovementofstairwells;considerliftto9AvSW 4.8
Medians• entertainmedianupgradewithe.g.verticalartisticelements,medianlightingfeatures• norecommendations
4.6
Railings • Replacerailingwithnewdesignedrailing 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• norecommendations 4.3
FunctionalLighting • installstreetlightingonmedian4.4
4.6
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
ActiveEdges
• Requireactiveusebuildingfrontagesalongtheunderpassstreetatthesidewalklevelforallnewdevelopments
• Whereveropportunitiesexist,redevelopexistingbuildingsonbasementand/orstreetlevelandprovideactiveedgesalongthestreet
4.3
AdvancedLighting• Consideradvancedlightingoftrafficlanes,bridgestructureofbothbridges,balustrades,retainingwalls,
foliageandbuildingfacadestoenhancepedestrianareaquality4.4
BikeFacilities • Provideon-streetsharedtravellanealongeastsideofthestreet 4.5
Landscaping
• DuetolimitedroadRight-of-waywidth(about20m)andrequirementsfor4trafficlanes(13.4m)andmedian(2m),thereisnotenoughspaceinthepublicdomainforaminimum1.5mtreeandfurnishingzonewhilemaintaininga3mwideclearsidewalk,unless:
• A5.182msetbackonbothsidesofthestreet(tobeconsistenttotheBylawsetbackrequirements)isrequiredforthefirstlevelofanynewdevelopmentalongthestreet,whichwillwidentheareaunderneaththebridgeandtransformthestreetintoaboulevardstreetscapecharacter
4.7
UniversalDesign• Asahighpedestrian-volumestreet,thedesignofthesidewalkmustprovidefullaccessforthe
physicallychallengedincludingthevisuallychallenged.Thestairwellsneedtobeupgraded.4.8
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Usepedestriansignageatappropriatelocationstodirect,advertiseandtellstories• Underpassartsatthebalustrades,theretainingwalls,orembeddedinthesidewalks• Underpassartsatappropriatelocationssuchasbuildingsetbackareas,corners,furnishingandtree
zones
4.9
4.11
7.4 Recommendations
7.04STREETSWUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A40 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Consideringthe:• HighpedestrianandcyclistvolumetoDowntownfromtheareasSouthoftheBeltline(Mission,Earlton,VictoraPark)• HighCCPimportance• Overallphysicalneedforimprovementsonvariousunderpasselements• Newlyopenedhigh-endretaillocationsatthenorthernentranceoftheunderpass(HoltRenfrew)• AdditionalcomingretaillocationsdirectlyborderingtheWestsideoftheunderpass(8thAveplace)• 4StreetunderpassrequiresahighpriorityforimplementationofthisGuideline.
7.4 Recommendations
7.04THSTREETSWUNDERPASS
A41
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
8.05STREETSWUNDERPASS
8.1 Local Context
1 2
3 4
5 6
6
B
A
3 2
4
5
1
A
DC
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A42 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No.
Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm 1 • Noexistingbuilt-upareasborderingtheretainingwalls
PedestrianRealm
1,4
31
2
1
54
16
• Pedestrianrealmwithwidesidewalks(3metres)allowingcomfortablespaceforheavypedestriantraffic;bikersusesidewalkasdedicatedMulti-usePathway
• Plainconcretewallinsteadofsteelrailingseparatessidewalkfromcarlanes• Plainconcreteretainingwallsunderneathbridestructure:nowall-mountedlightingfixturesordecorative
elements• Plain,widemedian(3metres)withraisedconcretesurface;balustradewithaggregateconcreteslabs;sewerpipe
alongSouthbalustrade• Aggregatedconcreteplatesmountedonretainingwallwithredcoloredpipehandrailandredcoloredpipe
railingontopside• Featuredstormwatersewerplantbuildingwithseparateentrancefromside• Widecornerradiiwithunclutteredpedestrianrealmatunderpassentrancesatthesouthcorners;inviting
cornersolution(trees,redcoloredpipehandrailsonsouthernend)• Cleanandevensurfacesunderneathbridgestructurewithceilingdownlighting(blackframe-effect)• Attractivepedestrianrealmalong5StSW(Westside)
RedevelopmentOpportunities
A,BC,D
• Cornerlots(presentuses:surfaceparking)on8and9AvSWofferavarietyofdevelopmentsolutionsandopportunitiestocreateactiveedgesalong5thunderpass(e.g.bridgingopportunityutilizingCPRair-space)
Linkages6 • MajorpedestrianlinkagewithhighfrequencybetweenBeltline,StephenAve.Mall,EatonCentre,restaurantand
pubdestinationsalong5StnorthofCPRtracks
RoadDesign• 4one-waytrafficlanes• 2.5metre/8feetmedian• 3metreclearanceforsidewalk
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• Pedestriancorridor• ExistingOn-StreetBicycleRoute• ProposedKeyOn-StreetBicycleRoute
8.2 Context Analysis
8.05STREETSWUNDERPASS
A43
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No.
Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm 1 • Noexistingbuilt-upareasborderingtheretainingwalls
PedestrianRealm
1,4
31
2
1
54
16
• Pedestrianrealmwithwidesidewalks(3metres)allowingcomfortablespaceforheavypedestriantraffic;bikersusesidewalkasdedicatedMulti-usePathway
• Plainconcretewallinsteadofsteelrailingseparatessidewalkfromcarlanes• Plainconcreteretainingwallsunderneathbridestructure:nowall-mountedlightingfixturesordecorative
elements• Plain,widemedian(3metres)withraisedconcretesurface;balustradewithaggregateconcreteslabs;sewerpipe
alongSouthbalustrade• Aggregatedconcreteplatesmountedonretainingwallwithredcoloredpipehandrailandredcoloredpipe
railingontopside• Featuredstormwatersewerplantbuildingwithseparateentrancefromside• Widecornerradiiwithunclutteredpedestrianrealmatunderpassentrancesatthesouthcorners;inviting
cornersolution(trees,redcoloredpipehandrailsonsouthernend)• Cleanandevensurfacesunderneathbridgestructurewithceilingdownlighting(blackframe-effect)• Attractivepedestrianrealmalong5StSW(Westside)
RedevelopmentOpportunities
A,BC,D
• Cornerlots(presentuses:surfaceparking)on8and9AvSWofferavarietyofdevelopmentsolutionsandopportunitiestocreateactiveedgesalong5thunderpass(e.g.bridgingopportunityutilizingCPRair-space)
Linkages6 • MajorpedestrianlinkagewithhighfrequencybetweenBeltline,StephenAve.Mall,EatonCentre,restaurantand
pubdestinationsalong5StnorthofCPRtracks
RoadDesign• 4one-waytrafficlanes• 2.5metre/8feetmedian• 3metreclearanceforsidewalk
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• Pedestriancorridor• ExistingOn-StreetBicycleRoute• ProposedKeyOn-StreetBicycleRoute
BridgeStructure √
Balustrades √
RetainingWalls √
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps(ifany)
√
Medians √ √
Railings √
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
√
FunctionalLighting √ √
ActiveEdges √ √
AdvancedLighting √ √
BikeFacilities √
Landscaping √
UniversalDesign √
PedestrianSignage √
UnderpassArts √
Design Elements
Evaluation of Existing ConditionsCriteria:SurfacePhysicalImpression,Functionality,Safety,ExistingorNon-existing,StructuralCondition(evaluatedbyCityofCalgary,Roads)
Poor ConditionsImmediateImprovementrequired
Fair ConditionsMayneedsomeimprovement
Good ConditionsMaynotneedimprovementintheshortterm
Not ApplicableCurrentlynon-existingfeatureswhicharestronglyrecommended
8.3 Evaluation Matrix
8.05STREETSWUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A44 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • norecommendations 4.1
Balustrades • balustradedesignupgraderequired:embedsmalllightingfixturesaspartoflightingtheme 4.1
RetainingWalls• embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewallsunderneathbridgestructure;createlightingscheme• Encourage“green”retainingwalls• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay
4.2
4.4
4.11
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps • norecommendations
Medians• entertainmedianupgradewithe.g.verticalartisticelements,medianlightingfeatures• norecommendations
4.6
Railings • Norecommendations
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• norecommendations
FunctionalLighting • Norecommendations
8.4 Recommendations
8.05STREETSWUNDERPASS
A45
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • norecommendations 4.1
Balustrades • balustradedesignupgraderequired:embedsmalllightingfixturesaspartoflightingtheme 4.1
RetainingWalls• embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewallsunderneathbridgestructure;createlightingscheme• Encourage“green”retainingwalls• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay
4.2
4.4
4.11
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps • norecommendations
Medians• entertainmedianupgradewithe.g.verticalartisticelements,medianlightingfeatures• norecommendations
4.6
Railings • Norecommendations
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• norecommendations
FunctionalLighting • Norecommendations
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
ActiveEdges• Requireactiveusebuildingfrontagesalongtheunderpassstreetatthesidewalklevelforallnew
developments4.3
AdvancedLighting • Consideradvancedlightingunderneathofbridgestructure,atretainingwallsandatthebalustrade 4.4
BikeFacilities • Provideon-streetsharedtravellanesalongwestsideofthestreet 4.5
Landscaping
• A5.182msetbackonbothsidesofthestreet(tobeconsistenttotheBylawsetbackrequirements)isrequiredforthefirstlevelofanynewdevelopmentalongthestreet,whichwillwidentheareaunderneaththebridgeandalongtheretainingwallandtransformthestreetintoaboulevard-streetscapecharacter
• The3mwidemediancouldallowplantersatselectedlocations
4.7
UniversalDesign• Asahighpedestrian-volumestreet,thedesignofthesidewalkmustprovidefullaccessforthephysically
challengedincludingthevisuallychallenged.4.8
PedestrianSignageandUnderpassArts
• Usepedestriansignageatappropriatelocationstodirect,advertiseandtellstories• Underpassartsatthebalustrades,theretainingwalls,orembeddedinthesidewalks• Underpassartsatappropriatelocationssuchasbuildingsetbackareas,cornersituations,furnishingandtree
zones
4.94.11
8.4 Recommendations
8.05STREETSWUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A46 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
8.4 Recommendations
The5StreetSWUnderpassisafairlynewunderpassdesignedinafashiontoaccommodatebothvehicular,pedestrianandbicycletraffic.Thecornersectionsareprovidingenoughspaceforaclearpathforpedestrians.Thevisualityintotheunderpassundunderneaththebridgeisgood;therearenodarkcornersorshadowcasts.Despitethelightingablack-frameexists.Theoverallimpressionisaveryfunctionalone.
Inthefuturetheemphasisshouldbeonencouragingdevelopmentstoopenuptheirbasementsontotheunderpassandtocreateactiveedgesalongthepedestrianzone.Inadditionthewidemediancouldbealocationforartisticdisplaysandadditionaldecorativelighting.
8.05STREETSWUNDERPASS
A47
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
9.08STREETSWUNDERPASS
9.1 Local Context
1 2
3 4
5 6
B
A6
2/3
4
51
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A48 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No. Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm
6 • Lowdensitylandusesolutionatthenorth-westunderpasscorner(clinic)incl.pedestrianpermeability;openspacearoundbuilding,whichencouragespedestriantraffic
• Builtformanduse(restaurant,pub)doesnotopentopedestrianrealm;façadewithoutprovidingarchitecturalactiveedgesolutions
PedestrianRealm
31
4
365
• Pedestrianrealmwhichiscreatingvariousbarriersforpeoplewithphysicalhandicaps• Attractivepatiosolution(barandrestaurant)withopensuptheretainingwall,landscapedbuildingfrontage
andclearvisibilityfromsidewalk• Commercialadvertisingatthebalustrade,whichcoverscompletebalustrade;poorlightingconditionsunder
thebridge;structuralpillarswhichallowlightandvisualopenness,poorlighting• Stairwellsunderneathsewagepipes• Noactiveedgeconditionsalongnorth-eastretainingwall;greycoloreduninvitingbuildingfacade• Invitingcornersolution(retail),creatingpedestriantraffic
RedevelopmentOpportunities
A
B
• Cornerlots(presentuses:restaurantandcardealership)on9thAveSWand8thStSWofferavarietyofdevelopmentsolutionsandopportunitiestocreateactiveedgealong8thunderpass
Linkages• MajorpedestrianlinkagebetweenBeltlineand8thStC-trainStationwithveryhighfrequency• Importantretaildestinations(Safeway,Outdoorshops)andrestaurant/pubdestinationssouthofCPRTracks
RoadDesign• 4one-waytrafficlanes• Aprox.1metre/3feetmedian• Approx.2.6metresidewalk
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• Pedestriancorridor• MajorBusRoute• ExistingOn-StreetBicycleRoute• ProposedKeyOn-StreetBicycleRoute
9.2 Context Analysis
9.08STREETSWUNDERPASS
A49
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No. Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm
6 • Lowdensitylandusesolutionatthenorth-westunderpasscorner(clinic)incl.pedestrianpermeability;openspacearoundbuilding,whichencouragespedestriantraffic
• Builtformanduse(restaurant,pub)doesnotopentopedestrianrealm;façadewithoutprovidingarchitecturalactiveedgesolutions
PedestrianRealm
31
4
365
• Pedestrianrealmwhichiscreatingvariousbarriersforpeoplewithphysicalhandicaps• Attractivepatiosolution(barandrestaurant)withopensuptheretainingwall,landscapedbuildingfrontage
andclearvisibilityfromsidewalk• Commercialadvertisingatthebalustrade,whichcoverscompletebalustrade;poorlightingconditionsunder
thebridge;structuralpillarswhichallowlightandvisualopenness,poorlighting• Stairwellsunderneathsewagepipes• Noactiveedgeconditionsalongnorth-eastretainingwall;greycoloreduninvitingbuildingfacade• Invitingcornersolution(retail),creatingpedestriantraffic
RedevelopmentOpportunities
A
B
• Cornerlots(presentuses:restaurantandcardealership)on9thAveSWand8thStSWofferavarietyofdevelopmentsolutionsandopportunitiestocreateactiveedgealong8thunderpass
Linkages• MajorpedestrianlinkagebetweenBeltlineand8thStC-trainStationwithveryhighfrequency• Importantretaildestinations(Safeway,Outdoorshops)andrestaurant/pubdestinationssouthofCPRTracks
RoadDesign• 4one-waytrafficlanes• Aprox.1metre/3feetmedian• Approx.2.6metresidewalk
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• Pedestriancorridor• MajorBusRoute• ExistingOn-StreetBicycleRoute• ProposedKeyOn-StreetBicycleRoute
BridgeStructure √
Balustrades √
RetainingWalls √
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps(ifany)
√
Medians √ √
Railings √
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
√ √
FunctionalLighting √
ActiveEdges √ √
AdvancedLighting(none) - - - √
BikeFacilities(none) - - - √
Landscaping √ √
UniversalDesign(none) - - - √
PedestrianSignage √
UnderpassArts(none) - - - √
9.3 Evaluation Matrix
Design Elements
Evaluation of Existing ConditionsCriteria:SurfacePhysicalImpression,Functionality,Safety,ExistingorNon-existing,StructuralCondition(evaluatedbyCityofCalgary,Roads)
Poor ConditionsImmediateimprovementrequired
Fair ConditionsMayneedsomeimprovement
Good ConditionsMaynotneedimprovementintheshortterm
Not ApplicableCurrentlynon-existingfeatureswhicharestronglyrecommended
9.08STREETSWUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A50 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • NewpaintingofsteelstructurefromCPRbridgerequired 4.1
Balustrades• Newbalustraderequired:encasesewerpipes• Discouragethird-partycommercialadvertisingonbalustrades,butallowbrandingopportunitieson
balustrades4.1
RetainingWalls
• Embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewalls• Usewaterproofsolutionstoavoidwaterrunoffonretainingwalls• Encourage“green”retainingwallsclosetoexistinglandscapedareas• Considerusingdurable,easytoclean,graffiti-proofmaterials• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay• Useceramictilestocreatemosaicartonsectionsofthewalls• Whereapplicable,providesurfaceforseatingatthelowerportionoftheretainingwallsadjacenttoexisting
restaurants• Enhancestormwaterpump-stationentrance
4,4
4.2
4.11
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps• Widenstairwellsonbothsideofbridgeonto9AvSW• Replacesidewalk-stairson9AvSWwithramp
4.8
Medians• Upgrademedianwithconcretepedestalandsomeverticalartisticelementsandlandscaping;addmedian
lighting4.6
Railings • Replacementofrailings 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Clearthedirtcornersfromdebrisatthebridgecorners• Encouragefoliagelighting
4.3
4.4
FunctionalLighting • Requirenewlightingtobrightentheareaunderthetwobridges 4.4
9.4 Recommendations
9.08STREETSWUNDERPASS
A51
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • NewpaintingofsteelstructurefromCPRbridgerequired 4.1
Balustrades• Newbalustraderequired:encasesewerpipes• Discouragethird-partycommercialadvertisingonbalustrades,butallowbrandingopportunitieson
balustrades4.1
RetainingWalls
• Embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewalls• Usewaterproofsolutionstoavoidwaterrunoffonretainingwalls• Encourage“green”retainingwallsclosetoexistinglandscapedareas• Considerusingdurable,easytoclean,graffiti-proofmaterials• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay• Useceramictilestocreatemosaicartonsectionsofthewalls• Whereapplicable,providesurfaceforseatingatthelowerportionoftheretainingwallsadjacenttoexisting
restaurants• Enhancestormwaterpump-stationentrance
4,4
4.2
4.11
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps• Widenstairwellsonbothsideofbridgeonto9AvSW• Replacesidewalk-stairson9AvSWwithramp
4.8
Medians• Upgrademedianwithconcretepedestalandsomeverticalartisticelementsandlandscaping;addmedian
lighting4.6
Railings • Replacementofrailings 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Clearthedirtcornersfromdebrisatthebridgecorners• Encouragefoliagelighting
4.3
4.4
FunctionalLighting • Requirenewlightingtobrightentheareaunderthetwobridges 4.4
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
ActiveEdges• Requireactiveusebuildingfrontagesatsidewalklevelforallnewdevelopments• Encourageactivebuildingfrontagesinexistingbuildings
4.3
AdvancedLighting• Consideradvancedlightingunderneathofbridgestructure,atretainingwallsandatthebalustradeofboth
bridges4.4
BikeFacilities • 8St.SWisanexistingkeybicycleroute 4.5
Landscaping• Existinglandscapingsetsagoodexample,withtheexceptionofthespacesurroundingtheclinicbuilding
whichrequiresimprovements(e.g.façadegreening,planterssurroundingtheparkinglot)4.7
UniversalDesign• Asahighpedestrian-volumestreet,thedesignofthesidewalkmustprovidefullaccessforthephysically
challengedincludingprovisionsforthevisuallychallenged.4.8
PedestrianSignageandUnderpassArts
• Usepedestriansignageatappropriatelocationstodirect,advertiseandtellstories• Underpassartsatthebalustrades,theretainingwalls,orembeddedinthesidewalks• Underpassartsatappropriatelocationse.gatbuildingsetbackareas,buildingcorners,furnishingandtree
zones
4.9
4.11
9.4 Recommendation
9.08STREETSWUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A52 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
The8StreetSWUnderpassaccommodatestwobridgesishasthehighestdailypedestrianvolumeofallexaminedunderpasses.Someretailersalongtheunderpasssetagoodexampleinprovidinglandscapingandactiveedgeusealthoughtherearemajordeficienciesalongtheunderpassstreetastheanalysisshows.Thepotentialofthisunderpassjustifiesamajorreconstructionandredesign.
9.4 Recommendations
9.08STREETSWUNDERPASS
A53
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
10. 11 Street Crossing (Potential Underpass)
1 2
3 4
5 6
10.011STREETCROSSING(POTENTIALUNDERPASS)
10.1 Local Context
1/2
AB
C
3/45/6
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A54 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No.
Descriptions (3 bridges)
Physical Context
BuiltForm 1,2,3 • Atgraderailroadcrossing,surroundedbycar-dealerships,parkinglotsandlowdensityofficeandcommercialonnorthandsouthside
PedestrianRealm
1,2,5 • Sidewalkwithchangingconcreteandblacktopsurface• Widesetbacksofbuildingsof10metres;noactiveedgeconditionswithincrossingrealm
4,5,6 • 2metrewidegravelstropseparatingsidewalkfromlane
7 • Raisedconcretesidewalkwithcurbonwestsideof11Street,landscapedcommercialpropertiesalongsidewalk
• Insufficientbasiclightingforsidewalks
RedevelopmentOpportunities
A • Cornerlots(presentuses:surfaceparking,automotiveon10AvenueSWofferavarietyofdevelopmentsolutionsandopportunitiestocreateactiveedgesalong11Street;bridgingopportunityutilizingCPRair-space
• ApprovedDevelopmentPermitoncornerof10Avenue(TheMontreaux)with1400unitsB • Newopportunitiesalongwestsideofunderpassforcommercial
Linkages • MajorpedestrianandbikerlinkagebetweenBeltline,MilleniumParkandBowRiver
EngineeringDesignStandards
• One-waytrafficlanes• On-streetbikepathsapproximately1.4metre/4.5feet• 1.4metre/4.5feetsidewalks
Policy Context
CentreCityPlanBeltlineARP
• On-StreetBicycleRoute
10.2 Context Analysis
10.011STREETCROSSING(POTENTIALUNDERPASS)
A55
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
BridgeStructure n/a
Balustrades n/a
RetainingWalls n/a
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps(ifany)
n/a
Medians n/a
Railings n/a
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
n/a
FunctionalLighting √
ActiveEdges √
AdvancedLighting n/a
BikeFacilities √
Landscaping √
UniversalDesign n/a
PedestrianSignage √ √
UnderpassArts n/a
10.3 Evaluation Matrix
Design Elements
Evaluation of Existing ConditionsCriteria:SurfacePhysicalImpression,Functionality,Safety,ExistingorNon-existing,StructuralCondition(evaluatedbyCityofCalgary,Roads)
Poor ConditionsImmediateimprovementrequired
Fair ConditionsMayneedsomeimprovement
Good ConditionsMaynotneedimprovementintheshortterm
Not ApplicableCurrentlynon-existingfeatureswhicharestronglyrecommended
10.011STREETCROSSING(POTENTIALUNDERPASS)
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A56 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
Thepotentialtobecomeanewunderpasshastobedeterminedbytrafficscenariosandtransportationstrategies.
Toimprovethepedestrianrealmonshortterm,sidewalkwideningandnewsurfaceontheeastsideof11StSWandadditionalbasiclightingisrequired.
4.4
4.5
Recommendon-streetbikelaneseparatedfromtrafficlaneswhentheunderpassisbeingbuilt. 4.5
10.4 Recommendations
10.011STREETCROSSING(POTENTIALUNDERPASS)
A57
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
11.014STREETSWUNDERPASS
11.1 Local Context
1 2
3 4
5 6
3
B
A
2/5
16
4
C
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A58 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No.
Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm
1 • Majorprovincialhighway(1A)withveryhightrafficvolume• Lightindustrialandcommerciallanduseonbothsidesoftheunderpassbetween10Avand11Av;built
formwhichdoesnotopentopedestrianrealmalongtheunderpass(chainlinkfences,steepberms);industrialandcommercialbuildingse.g.lightingsstore,autodealershipsandautorepair
• CPRbridgefromapprox.1950ties(samestyleas4thSWunderpass);2overpassesfor8AvSW
PedestrianRealm
2
632115
• Pedestrianrealmwithinthis3-bridgeenvironmentprovidesanapprox.2.5metreswidepathway;widestairwellsonbothsideofbridgestructure;greenbermsonnorthandsouthsidesofbridge
• Sidewalkatgradeunderneath8Ave.bridges,gradeseparationunderneathCPR• Unsecuredpedestriancrossingsatstreetexitto9AveSW• Cleanbutroughconcreteenvironmentunderneath9Avestreetbridges• Noactiveedgeconditionsalongretainingwalls;largestormwaterpumpstationarea• Greenbermswithdispersedbushesandtreescreatingsomewhatcomfortableatmosphere• UnderpassusedfrequentlyusedbyjoggersandbikerstoandfromMilleniumParkandBowRiver
pathway;bikersusemainlystreetlane(observationduringphotoshooting)
RedevelopmentOpportunities A,B,C
• ApprovedDevelopmentPermitoncornerof10Ave(TheMontreaux)with1400units• Newopportunitiesalongwestsideofunderpassforcommercial
Linkages• NolinkageindicationinCCPon14StSWunderpass• Importantretaildestinations(Safeway,Outdoorshops)andrestaurant/pubdestinationssouthofCPR
Tracks
RoadDesign• 4one-waytrafficlanes• 1metre/3feetmedian• 2.0–2.4metressidewalks
Policy Context
CentreCityBeltlinePlanARP
• HighTrafficVolumeStreet• KeyOn-StreetBicycleRoutecrossingbridgeon10AvSW
11.2 Context Analysis
11.014STREETSWUNDERPASS
A59
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Ref No.
Descriptions
Physical Context
BuiltForm
1 • Majorprovincialhighway(1A)withveryhightrafficvolume• Lightindustrialandcommerciallanduseonbothsidesoftheunderpassbetween10Avand11Av;built
formwhichdoesnotopentopedestrianrealmalongtheunderpass(chainlinkfences,steepberms);industrialandcommercialbuildingse.g.lightingsstore,autodealershipsandautorepair
• CPRbridgefromapprox.1950ties(samestyleas4thSWunderpass);2overpassesfor8AvSW
PedestrianRealm
2
632115
• Pedestrianrealmwithinthis3-bridgeenvironmentprovidesanapprox.2.5metreswidepathway;widestairwellsonbothsideofbridgestructure;greenbermsonnorthandsouthsidesofbridge
• Sidewalkatgradeunderneath8Ave.bridges,gradeseparationunderneathCPR• Unsecuredpedestriancrossingsatstreetexitto9AveSW• Cleanbutroughconcreteenvironmentunderneath9Avestreetbridges• Noactiveedgeconditionsalongretainingwalls;largestormwaterpumpstationarea• Greenbermswithdispersedbushesandtreescreatingsomewhatcomfortableatmosphere• UnderpassusedfrequentlyusedbyjoggersandbikerstoandfromMilleniumParkandBowRiver
pathway;bikersusemainlystreetlane(observationduringphotoshooting)
RedevelopmentOpportunities A,B,C
• ApprovedDevelopmentPermitoncornerof10Ave(TheMontreaux)with1400units• Newopportunitiesalongwestsideofunderpassforcommercial
Linkages• NolinkageindicationinCCPon14StSWunderpass• Importantretaildestinations(Safeway,Outdoorshops)andrestaurant/pubdestinationssouthofCPR
Tracks
RoadDesign• 4one-waytrafficlanes• 1metre/3feetmedian• 2.0–2.4metressidewalks
Policy Context
CentreCityBeltlinePlanARP
• HighTrafficVolumeStreet• KeyOn-StreetBicycleRoutecrossingbridgeon10AvSW
BridgeStructure √
Balustrades √
RetainingWalls √
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps(ifany)
√
Medians √
Railings √
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
√
FunctionalLighting √
ActiveEdges - - - √
AdvancedLighting(none) - - - √
BikeFacilities(none) - - √
Landscaping √ √
UniversalDesign(none) - - - √
PedestrianSignage √
UnderpassArts(none) - - - √
11.3 Evaluation Matrix
Design Elements
Evaluation of Existing ConditionsNon-existing,StructuralCondition(evaluatedbyCityofCalgary,Roads)
Poor ConditionsImmediateimprovementrequired
Fair ConditionsMayneedsomeimprovement
Good ConditionsMaynotneedimprovementintheshortterm
Not ApplicableCurrentlynon-existingfeatureswhicharestronglyrecommended
11.014STREETSWUNDERPASS
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
A60 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • NewpaintingofsteelstructurefromCPRbridgerequired 4.1
Balustrades• Newbalustraderequired:encasesewerpipes• Discouragethird-partycommercialadvertisingonbalustrades,butallowbrandingopportunitieson
balustrades4.1
RetainingWalls
• Embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewalls• Usewaterproofsolutionstoavoidwaterrunoffonretainingwalls• Encourage“green”retainingwallsclosetoexistinglandscapedareas• Considerusingdurable,easytoclean,graffiti-proofmaterials• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay• Useceramictilestocreatemosaicartonsectionsofthewalls• Enhancestormwaterpump-stationentrance
4.2
4.4
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps• Widenstairwellsonbothsideofbridgeonto9AvSW• Replacesidewalk-stairson9AvSWwithramp
4.5
Medians• Upgrademedianwithconcretepedestalandsomeverticalartisticelementsandlandscaping;addmedian
lighting4.6
Railings • Replacementofrailings
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Clearthedirtcornersfromdebrisatthebridgecorners• Encouragefoliagelighting
FunctionalLighting • Requirenewlightingtobrightentheareaunderthetwobridges 4.4
11.4 Recommendations
11.014STREETSWUNDERPASS
A61
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
Appendix B: Underpass Analysis
APPENDIX B: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • NewpaintingofsteelstructurefromCPRbridgerequired 4.1
Balustrades• Newbalustraderequired:encasesewerpipes• Discouragethird-partycommercialadvertisingonbalustrades,butallowbrandingopportunitieson
balustrades4.1
RetainingWalls
• Embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewalls• Usewaterproofsolutionstoavoidwaterrunoffonretainingwalls• Encourage“green”retainingwallsclosetoexistinglandscapedareas• Considerusingdurable,easytoclean,graffiti-proofmaterials• Installpictureframesonthewallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplay• Useceramictilestocreatemosaicartonsectionsofthewalls• Enhancestormwaterpump-stationentrance
4.2
4.4
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps• Widenstairwellsonbothsideofbridgeonto9AvSW• Replacesidewalk-stairson9AvSWwithramp
4.5
Medians• Upgrademedianwithconcretepedestalandsomeverticalartisticelementsandlandscaping;addmedian
lighting4.6
Railings • Replacementofrailings
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Clearthedirtcornersfromdebrisatthebridgecorners• Encouragefoliagelighting
FunctionalLighting • Requirenewlightingtobrightentheareaunderthetwobridges 4.4
Design Elements RecommendationsSection No. for Design Guidelines
BridgeStructure • Norecommendation 4.1
Balustrades • Norecommendation 4.1
RetainingWalls
• Embedsmalllightingfeaturesintheconcretewallsofallthreebridges• Encourage“green”retainingwalls,especiallyaroundstormwaterpump-station• Installpictureframesonwallsforchangeableinterpretivesignageorartdisplayofallthreewalls• Useceramictilestocreatemosaicartonsomesectionsofthewalls• Enhancestormwaterpump-stationentrance
4.4
4.2
4.11
4.10
Sidewalks,StairsandRamps• Providenewsurfaceblacktopforsidewalk• Providestreetmarkings,signageandlightingforsafercrossingofstreetexitsto9AVSW
4.8
Median • Upgrademedianwithe.g.concretepedestalandadddecorativemedianlightingelements 4.6
Railings • Paintrailings 4.1
Pedestrian/BuildingorParkingLotInterface
• Duetosteepslopesthecreationofinterfaceswithbuildingfrontsandentrancesisachallenge 4.3
FunctionalLighting • RequirenewlightingtobrightentheareaundertheCPRbridgeduringdaytimeandafterdark 4.4
11.4 Recommendations
11.014STREETSWUNDERPASS
A62 APPENDIX B: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
A63
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Appendix C Case Study4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
1.0 Vision Statement and Key Principles ..................................................................................................... A64
2.0 Master Plan ...............................................................................................................................................A65
3.0 Design Elements .......................................................................................................................................A66
4.0 Visualization ..............................................................................................................................................A67
A64 APPENDIX C: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
1.0VisionStatementandKeyPrinciples4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
During 2007 and 2008 stakeholders for the proposed 4 Street SEUnderpassdiscussedthefuturedesignofthisunderpassandagreedonaVisionStatementandKeyPrinciplesinordertoachieveahighqualitypublicrealm:
Vision Statement
“ A welcoming, high quality, pedestrian orientated, multi modalcontinuousconnectionbetweenthehighstreetsoftwovibrant,dense,urbanneighborhoods.”
Key Principles
1. Pedestriansandcyclistsareafirstpriority.
2. A continuous pedestrian experience from neighborhood toneighborhood.
3. Safety:mustprovideasenseofsecurity.
4. Minimizeloweringofexistingintersections.
5. Universalaccessibilityforallpedestriansandcycliststobeprovidedatgrade.
6. Minimizeimpactofvehiclesonpedestrians(cornerradii).
7. Designmustencouragecivilbehavior.
8. Beauty and grace to be reflected in structure and proportion(overpass).
9. Structureshallbecomfortable,inviting(lightingandspacearekey).
10. Structure must enhance adjacent development with active edgeopportunities.
11.Maximizeclearspan.
12. Localcollectorstreetstandardmustberespected.
13.Designshouldcelebrateexistingbuiltheritage.
14. Lane widths should be designed to minimum standards, outsidelanestoaccommodatecyclists.
15.Maintainon-streetparking(northandsouthofstructure).
16. Publicartandstructureasarttobeintegratedintodesign.
17. East/Westconnectivitysouthoftheunderpassapriority.
18.Designshouldincorporatesustainable“green’principles.
A65
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
2.0MasterPlan
Themasterplan for4StreetSEUnderpasshas incorporatedthekeyprinciplesasidentifiedbythestakeholdergroupsforthisunderpassandmanydesignelementsthatareproposedinthisGuideline,includingactiveedges,sidewalk/multi-usepathway,medians, landscaping,underpassart,etc..
Since the construction of the underpass structure and utilityinfrastructurehasstartedin2009,thismaterplanisnotareflectionofwhatishappeningontheground,butarepresentationofbest-practiceurbandesignsolutions.
Area (see illustration on the next page)Legend
A66
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
3.0DesignElements
Thedesignofactiveedgesincludescontinuousactiveusebuildingfrontagesatsidewalklevel,andanactivitynode.Theactivitynodeprovidesafocalpointinthearea,aneast-westpedestrian/bikeconnection,andalargegreenspaceinbetweentheproposedhigh-densityresidentialdevelopments.Themulti-usestructurebreaksdown the long linear retainingwalls and thegradedifferencebetween the sidewalk level andsurroundingprivateproperties. The2-storey structure functions as stairs and ramps, aswell as a landmark featurebyincorporatingactiveuse,speciallighting,andpublicartintothedesign.
A67
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.0 Visualization
Thevisualizationdemonstratesthevarietyofurbandesignopportunitieswithinanunderpassretrofitornewconstruction.
The internal and external engagement and consulting processes forthenew4StreetSEunderpasscommencedin2006,leadinguptothedesigncurrentlyunderconstruction.Duringthedevelopmentoftheseguidelines, because it was completely new, 4 Street SE was used toillustrateasfullarangeaspossibleofthepossibledesignopportunities.Theconsultantsfortheunderpassurbandesignconceptcurrentlyunderconstructionwereengagedduring thecreationof thisdocumentandtheimplementeddesignreflectsmanyoftheconceptsdiscussed.
A68
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.0 Visualization
3
3
4
4
Off-StreetMulti-UsePathway
ActiveEdges
5
5
6
6
UnderpassArts
UniversalDesignTextileSystemSeparatingSidewalkandCycleTrack
1
1
2
2
BridgeStructure
SidewalkZone 4
A69
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.0 Visualization
Median
3
33
4
4
ActiveEdges1
1
2
22
BridgeStructure
SidewalkZone
A70
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.0 Visualization
3
3
PublicAccessiblePrivatePlaza/ParkSidewalkZone
5
5
6
6
BridgeStructure
Mulsti-UsePathway
1
1
2
2
ActivityNode/Multi-useStructureStorefronts 4
4
labellingonthisphotoisn’trightCarmenMarch18th
A71
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.0 Visualization
3
3
Off-StreetMulti-UsePathway
ActiveEdges
5
5
6
6
UnderpassArts
UniversalDesignTextileSystemSeparatingSidewalkandCycleTrack
1
1
2
2
BridgeStructure
Sidewalk 4
4
A72
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.0 Visualization
3
3
High-densityResidentialDevelopmentActiveEdge
5
5
6
UniversalDesign
Arts
1
1
2
2
Plaza/Park
ActivityNode/Multi-useStructure
4
4
6
A73
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.0 Visualization
NighttimeVisualization
A74
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
3 StreetLightingandIlluminationCombinedActiveEdge
5
5
BridgeStructureandBalustrade1
1
2
2
Plaza/Park
On-StreetBikePath 4
4
4.0 Visualization
3
ImagebyMarshallTittemoreArchitects
4 Street SE Underpass Consultant Design
A75
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
2 Bridgebalustradewithbris-de-soleilpublicartcombined
3 ActiveEdgebasement-levelopeningsandstore/officefronts
1 RetainingWallwithilluminationfeatures
4.0 Visualization
1
2
3
ImagebyMarshallTittemoreArchitects
4 Street SE Underpass Consultant Design
A76
4TH STREET SE UNDERPASS
APPENDIX C: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
4.0 Visualization
3 Wayfindingandstreetmap
Off-streetMulti-usePathway
5
5
Patios1
1
2
2
Plaza/Park(10Avecul-de-sac)Seamlesspedestrianlinksandramps
4
4
3
ImagebyMarshallTittemoreArchitects
4 Street SE Underpass Consultant Design
APPENDIX D: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES A77
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Appendix D: Project Credits
Project Preparation
UrbanDesign&HeritageCentreCityPlanning&DesignLandUsePlanning&PolicyTheCityofCalgary
Internal Stakeholder Circulation
LandUsePlanning&Policy/CentreCity
TransportationPlanning/CentreCity
TransportationPlanning/PedestrianandBicyclePolicy&Projects
TransportationPlanning/NetworkPlanning
TransportationPlanning/DevelopmentServices
TransportationPlanning/TransportationSolutions
CalgaryTransit
Roads/SubdivisionDevelopment
Roads/Streetlighting
Roads/Bridges&Structures
Roads/TrafficEngineering
Recreation/PublicArt
Parks/UrbanForestry
CentreCityImplementation
“4 Street SE Community Link” Engagement Sessions 2005-2006
AlanJacobsMcElhanneyConsultingScatliff+Miller+MurrayBucklandTaylorAldermen,Ward7andWard8LandUsePlanning&Policy,CityofCalgaryTransportation,CityofCalgaryCorporateProperties,CityofCalgaryParks,CityofCalgaryRecreation/PublicArt,CityofCalgaryVictoriaCrossingBRZ
External Stakeholder Circulation
CalgaryMunicipalLandCorporation(CMLC)
MarshallTittemoreArchitects(MTA)
CalgaryDowntownAssociation
BeltlineCommunityAssociation
VictoriaCrossingBRZ
Contact
LandUsePlanning&PolicyTheCityofCalgaryP.O.Box2100,StnM#8117Calgary,ABT2P2M5
A78
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Appendix D: Project Credits
APPENDIX D: JULY 2010 DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Photo Credits
MarshallTittemoreArchitects
MarshallTittemoreArchitects
MarshallTittemoreArchitects
FestivalofLightBerlin
FestivalofLightBerlin Corbin
Corbin
IngenieurbueroBarrierefreiesPlanen+Bauen,Fulda(Germany)
A79
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES DRAFT REPORT MAY 2010
DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Appendix D: Project Credits
APPENDIX D: JULY 2010DOWNTOWN UNDERPASS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Corbin
CalgaryDowntownRetailDistrictStrategy
CalgaryDowntownRetailDistrictStrategy