27
Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th , 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural System Redesign

Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Jeremiah ErgasAE 482 – 5th Year Senior Thesis

Structural OptionApril 15th, 2008

Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari

Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural System Redesign

Page 2: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

Intro

Page 3: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline Building Background – Location

North East United States

Manhattan

Northside Piers - 4 North 5th Street, Brooklyn, NY

Building Background

Page 4: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline Building Background - Architecture

- 29 Story Condominium Tower

- 176 units

- Two typical floor plans (7500SF and 6200SF)

- Glass Cladding System that allows for floor to ceiling views

- No drop ceiling over living spaces

Building Background

Page 5: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline Building Background – Structural System

- Flat plate two-way mild reinforced slab

- Irregular Column Scheme

- Shear Walls around central core with additional wall

Building Background

Page 6: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline Redesign Goals

- Floor Slab System - Mild reinforced vs. Post-Tensioned?

- Shear Wall System - More optimal layout?

Structural Elements Studied

- Construction Management

- Acoustics

- Mechanical Exhaust Risers

Other Disciplines Considered

- Make structure more cost effective

- Meet or improve serviceability of structure

Redesign Goals

Redesign Goals

Page 7: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

26th–Roof

Slab Design - Introduction

- Make slab more cost effective

- Meet or improve serviceability of structure

Slab Redesign Goals

- No room for beams

- Tendons improve slab efficiency

- Tendons reduce deflections

Why Post-Tensioned System?

- RAM Concept with Post-Tensioned spreadsheets

- Must meet ACI318-05

Design Method

- 60psf Live

- 15psf Super

- 40psf Live

- 30psf Super

Design Loads (Floor) Design Loads (Balconies)

Slab Design

Page 8: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

26th–Roof

Slab Design – Current System

- 8” Slabs with #5’s @ 12” o/c on Top and Bottom going both ways

- Additional bars added as shown on plan

3rd–25th Floor Typical Slab 26th-Roof Typical Slab

Slab Design

Page 9: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

26th–Roof

Slab Design – Current System

3rd–25th Floor Long-Term Deflection 26th-Roof Long-Term Deflection

Maximum Long-Term Deflection: 0.67” Maximum Long-Term Deflection: 0.74”

ACI318 Limit (30’ Span): L/480 = 0.75”

Slab Design

Page 10: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

26th–Roof

Slab Design – Post-Tensioned System

3rd–25th Floor Tendon Plans 26th-Roof Tendon Plans

Maximum Long-Term Deflection: 0.48” Maximum Long-Term Deflection: 0.49”

Slab Design

Column Shifted Column Added

Page 11: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

26th–Roof

Slab Design – Post-Tensioned System

- 7” Slabs

- ½” Unbonded Tendons

- Typical Profile heights of 5.75” and 1.25”

- Typically #4 bars @ 24”o/c at bottom, both ways

-Top reinforcing at columns and walls

Design Details

- 35% Banded tendon Load-Balancing Percentage

- 40% Uniform tendon Load-Balancing Percentage

- Maximum P/A of 320psi

Tendon Stress

Slab Design

Page 12: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

26th–Roof

Slab Design – Comparisons/Conclusions

Serviceability Comparison

- Maximum Long-Term Deflections reduced by about 30%

- Both slabs meet the IBC requirement for a 2-hr fire rating

- The difference in Sound Transmission Level is almost imperceptible (57-56)

Cost Comparison Slab Design

- $36,000 will be saved if the story height is decreased by 1”

Page 13: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

Original Shear Walls Viewed from South West

Shear Wall Design - Introduction

- Make shear walls more cost effective

- Meet or improve serviceability of structure

Shearwall Redesign Goals

- Wind Loads were found from a wind tunnel test

- Wind produced base moments almost twice that of seismic

Lateral Loads

- ETABS with shear wall spreadsheets

- Must meet ACI318-05

Design Method

- Story Drift must be less than L/600

- Building acceleration must be less than 15 milli-g

Serviceability Issues

Shear Wall Design

Page 14: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline Shear Wall Design – Current Layout

Original Shear WallsViewed From South West

Original Shear WallsViewed From North East

Original Shear Walls Plan

3rd–25th Floor

Original Shear Walls Viewed from South West

- 8ksi concrete below 14th floor

- 6ksi concrete above 14th floor

Design Information

- Total deflection: 3.80” (H/1004)

- Torsional deflection: 2.82 milli-rad

- Max story drift: H/759

Serviceability

Shear Wall Design

Page 15: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

Original Shear Walls Viewed from South West

Shear Wall Design – Considered Layouts

Modified Original Additional Wall

Shortened Wall Opposite Wall OnlyCore Only

Shear Wall Design

Page 16: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

Original Shear Walls Viewed from South West

Shear Wall Design – Considered Layouts

Shear Wall Design

Page 17: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

Original Shear Walls Viewed from South West

Shear Wall Design – Alternate Layout

Original Shear WallsViewed From South West

Original Shear WallsViewed From North East

Original Shear Walls Plan

- Total deflection: 3.81” (H/1002)

- Torsional deflection: 2.49 milli-rad

Serviceability

Shear Wall Design

Page 18: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

3rd–25th Floor

Original Shear Walls Viewed from South West

Shear Wall Design – Comparison/Conclusions

Serviceability Comparison

- New layout reduced torsional deflections by 12%

- Both layouts have equivalent total deflections and story drifts

Cost Comparison

Shear Wall Design

Page 19: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline Construction Management – Schedule Comparison

Schedule Comparison

Construction Management

Page 20: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline Construction Management – Schedule Comparison

Schedule Comparison

Construction Management

Page 21: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline Construction Management – Construction Issues

Typical Floor Plan (Ground-11th Floor)

Construction Management

Page 22: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline Overall Conclusions

Post-Tensioned Slab

New Shear Wall Layout

Serviceability Exceeded?

More Cost Effective?

30% less long term deflection

20% Cheaper

12% less torsional deflection 5% Cheaper

Overall Conclusions

Page 23: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline Acknowledgements

Thanks to:

McLaren Engineering

Toll Brother’s Inc.

FxFowle Architects

Dr. Ali Memari

The entire AE Department Faculty and Staff

All of the practitioners who participated in the discussion boards

All my friends and family

The Class of 2008

Acknowledgements

Page 24: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

Any Questions???

Page 25: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

Existing Ceiling Link Beam Height: 7’-9”

Reduction due to thinner slab: 1”

Reduction for shear walls: 3”

Potential New Ceiling Link Beam Height: 7’-5”

New York City Limit: 7’-0” (Gives 5” for finishes)

Page 26: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline

Page 27: Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural

Intro

Building Overview

Redesign Goals

Slab Design

Shear Wall Design

Construction Management

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Questions???

Presentation Outline