Jack A. Tuszynski- NL2678: Renormalization groups

  • Upload
    kiomax

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Jack A. Tuszynski- NL2678: Renormalization groups

    1/4

    NL2678 Renormalization groups 1

    NL2678 Renormalization groups

    Systems undergoing phase transitions at a critical temperature Tc are convenientlydescribed in terms of order parameters and critical exponents. Above Tc, for example,

    the specific heat is found experimentally to vary as where (T Tc)/Tc, and

    below Tc, it varies as (). Thus and are called critical exponents for specific

    heat. Similar critical exponents are found for order parameters, isothermal susceptibility,

    response to an external field, the correlation length , and the pair correlation function

    (r). These are denoted as , , , , and , respectively.

    Relations among these critical exponents can be derived from scaling assumptions

    such as the static scaling hypothesis, which asserts that the Gibbs potential G(T, H)

    for magnetic systems (as an example) is a generalized homogeneous function

    G(a, aHH) = G(, H) . (1)

    With an arbitrary value of and selecting a, aH appropriately, relations among

    critical exponents are found through thermodynamic identities, for example, M(, H) =

    dG(, H)/dH. Thus, Equation (1) leads to the following relations:

    =1 aH

    a, =

    aH1 aH

    , =2aH 1

    a, =

    2aH 1

    a, = 2

    1

    a. (2)

    These can be recast as critical exponent equations:

    + ( + 1) = 2 ,

    + 2+ = 2 ,( + 1) = (2 )( 1) ,

    = ( 1) ,

    = ,

    = ,

    reducing the number of independent critical exponents to just four (a, aH, , and ).

    The two exponents that describe spatial correlations ( and ) also involve a scaling

    relationship as was shown through dynamic scaling arguments by Leo Kadanoff and

    Michael Fisher, among others. In the two-dimensional (2-D) Ising model aboveTc

    , for

    example, spin-spin correlations show short-range order, whereas below Tc the system

    exhibits long-range order. As T tends to Tc from either side, (r r) becomes long

    ranged and decays slowly as |r r| 1, with the correlation length diverging. This is

    typical of most critical systems for which long-range fluctuations accompany the onset

    of a second-order phase transition. However, in the 2-D XY model, the correlation

    function exhibits an algebraic fall-off as (r) r(T), demonstrating lack of long-

    range order in an unusual critical systemthe so-called KosterlitzThouless transition

    whose hallmark is the formation of vortex-antivortex pairs. Mermin and Wagner (1966)

    proved that any 2-D system with short-range interactions whose ordered phase has a

  • 8/3/2019 Jack A. Tuszynski- NL2678: Renormalization groups

    2/4

    NL2678 Renormalization groups 2

    Figure 1. A schematic illustration of the Kadanoff construction.

    continuous symmetry does not support long-range order. This is because at least one

    branch of collective excitationscalled Goldstone bosonshas energy that tends to zero

    continuously as its wave vector (crystal momentum) vanishes.

    With the exception of such unusual systems, spatial scaling applies to criticality,

    which according to Kadanoff is to be understood as coarse graining. This means that the

    essential features of the system remain unchanged as the lattice length scale is increased

    by a factor such that 1 /a, where is the correlation length and a is the

    lattice spacing (see Figure 1).IfN is the number of lattice sites and d the dimensionality of the system, then m =

    N/d is the number of blocks obtained in the first rescaling process. Simultaneously, the

    lattice variables (e.g., spins) and the interaction parameters are redefined. The effective

    spins now represent each block and interaction parameters refer to the interacting blocks.

    Taking the Ising model as an example, the cell Hamiltonian is:

    Hcell = JN

    i,j

    SiSj hN

    i

    Si. (3)

    Then the block Hamiltonian becomes

    Hblock = J

    m

    ,SS h

    m

    S, (4)

    where the tilde quantities refer to blocks. Crucial assumptions are that thermodynamic

    potentials scale with block size as:

    Fblock(, h) = dFcell(, h), (5)

    where h = xh, = y, and that F is a homogeneous function. Hence the exponents

    x and y are calculated as y = ad and x = aHd. The Kadanoff construction applied to

    the pair correlation function,

    (e, ) = (Si S)(Sj S), (6)

  • 8/3/2019 Jack A. Tuszynski- NL2678: Renormalization groups

    3/4

    NL2678 Renormalization groups 3

    gives y = 1, and since y = da and a = (2)1 we find that: = and d = 2.

    Using x = aHd with aH = /( + 1) results in (2 ) = .

    Thus static and dynamic scaling hypotheses reduce the number of independent

    critical exponents to just two. The renormalization group (RG) theory was developed

    to calculate the values of these exponents for particular models by carrying out the

    scaling procedure up to , and because as T Tc, scaling should continue ad

    infinitum as T approaches Tc.

    Denoting the cell Hamiltonian by H0 and the Hamiltonian after the nth step of

    rescaling as Hn, the chain of scaling transformations R is

    R(H0) = H1, R(H1) = H2, . . . , R(Hn) = Hn+1, . . . , R(H) = H, (7)

    where H denotes a fixed point Hamiltonian characteristic of the critical state. Each

    step in the RG transformation chain reduces the number of degrees of freedom by d.

    In statistical mechanics we need to ensure that the partition function retains the samesymmetry and ground-state, and hence we must re-scale the coupling constant at each

    step, for example, K = J/kT in the Ising model. We then develop a recursion relation

    to compute the partition function.

    An iterative solution of this recursion relation for the partition function yields

    roots or fixed points which correspond to resultant critical behaviors in the model.

    The partition function is preserved in the RG procedure via the condition

    ZN(Hn) = Zm(Hn+1) (8)

    where m = N/d.

    It is conjectured that the values of critical exponents are characteristics not ofindividual Hamiltonians but their sets, with numerous models leading to the same fixed

    point. The universality hypothesis states that any two physical systems with the same

    dimensionality, d, and the same number of order parameter components, n, belong to

    the same universality class, and each fixed point corresponds to one universality class.

    Table 1 is a summary of the critical exponent values obtained from RG calculations for

    key theoretical models.

    RG ideas extend into many areas of physics, chemistry, biology, and engineering.

    Based on the work of Kadanoff, Kenneth Wilson proposed an algorithmic approach to

    the scaling problem by formulating it in reciprocal space. Although less intuitive than

    the real-space RG of Kadanoff, it leads to exact results for the removal of divergenciesin theories of elementary particles. For this work, Wilson was awarded the 1982 Nobel

    Prize in Physics.

    Jack A. Tuszynski

    See also Critical phenomena; Ising model; Order parameters; Phase transitions

  • 8/3/2019 Jack A. Tuszynski- NL2678: Renormalization groups

    4/4

    NL2678 Renormalization groups 4

    Model

    Classical (MFT) 0 (disc.) 12 1 3

    Spherical: d = 3 12 2 1 5 0

    Spherical: > 0 /(2 ) 1

    2

    2/(2 ) 1/(2 ) 1 + 4/(2 ) 0

    Ising: d = 2 (exact) 0 (log) 18

    74

    1 15 14

    Ising: d = 3 0.12 0.33 1.25 0.64 4.8 0.04

    Heisenberg: d = 3 0.12 0.36 1.39 0.71 4.8 0.04

    S4-model: d > 4 /2 12 /4 112 3 + 0

    S4-model: d = 4 0 12

    1 12

    3 0

    S4-model: d < 4 /6 12 /6 1 + /612 + /12 3 + 0

    S4-model: d = 3 0.17 0.33 1.17 0.58 4 0

    XY-model: d = 3 0.01 0.34 1.30 0.66 4.8 0.04

    Table 1. Summary of Critical Exponents for Key Models. Note that = (4 d).

    Further Reading

    Creswick, R.J., Farach, H.A. & Poole, C.P. 1992. Introduction to Renormalization Group

    Methods in Physics, New York: Wiley

    Kosterlitz, J.M. & Thouless, D.J. 1973. Ordering, metastability and phase transitions

    in two-dimensional systems. Journal of Physics C, 6: 11811203

    Ma, S.-K. 1976. Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena, New York: Benjamin

    Mermin, N.D. & Wagner, H. 1966. Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism

    in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models. Physics Review Letters, 17:11331136

    Reichl, L.E. 1979. A Modern Course in Statistical Physics, Austin, Texas: University of

    Texas Press

    Stanley, H.E. 1972. Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Oxford:

    Clarendon Press and New York: Oxford University Press

    Wilson, K.G. 1972. Feynman-graph expansion for critical exponents. Physics Review

    Letters, 28: 548551

    Wilson, K.G. 1983. The renormalization group and critical phenomena. Reviews of

    Modern Physics, 55: 583600

    Yeomans, J.M. 1992. Statistical Mechanics of Phase Transitions, Oxford: Clarendon

    Press and New York: Oxford University Press