22
*Institute for Environmental Studies, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01 Prague 2, Czech Republic ** Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova 135, 165 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic J. Hovorka*, M.Braniš*, J.Schwarz** DIURNAL VARIATION OF SUBMICRON PM SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND GASEOUS POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS, PRAGUE 2004, POLLUTION SOURCE ESTIMATION [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

  • Upload
    zilya

  • View
    89

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

DIURNAL VARIATION OF SUBMICRON PM SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND GASEOUS POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS, PRAGUE 2004, POLLUTION SOURCE ESTIMATION. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

*Institute for Environmental Studies, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01 Prague 2, Czech Republic

** Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova 135, 165 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic

J. Hovorka*, M.Braniš*, J.Schwarz**

DIURNAL VARIATION OF SUBMICRON PM SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND GASEOUS

POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS, PRAGUE 2004, POLLUTION SOURCE ESTIMATION

[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Page 2: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

Motivation of our work• three years of our air monitoring revealed frequent (30% of days) bimodal pattern of diurnal variation of NOx, NMHC, CH4, CO partially SO2

• first mode 8-9 a.m. traffic rush hours

• second mode 8-10 p.m. NO rush hours

? ARE THESE MEASUREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC ?

? DOES AEROSOL BEHAVE SIMILARY?

? WHAT ARE LIKELY SOURCES?

Page 3: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

Parameters determined

5 mins averages

• 14 – 710 nm aerosol size distribution (SMPS)

15 mins averages

• NO, NO2 , CO, SO2, CH4, Non-Methane HC, O3 (Horiba 360)

• temperature, humidity, UV-A,B, wind speed/direction

hourly averages

• PM10 by -attenuator,

• traffic volumes

• natural gas consumption in near-by stationary sources

Page 4: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

Sampling site

• roof-top aerosol/gasses sampling in University botanical garden in the Prague city center

• at height about 25 m above the street

• no street canyon conditions

• duration 1.9.2004 – 31.12.2004

Page 5: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

University University Botanic garden Botanic garden sampling sitesampling site

PRAGUE 2

Wind dire

ction

Hospital heating plant

Page 6: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

University Botanic garden, roof-top sampling inlets

Page 7: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

Roof-top sampling configuration

Page 8: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

Diurnal variation of CO, NO, NO2, SO2, NMHC, CH4 in Botanical garden in Prague center, 5.10.2004

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2000:

15

1:30

2:45

4:00

5:15

6:30

7:45

9:00

10:1

5

11:3

0

12:4

5

14:0

0

15:1

5

16:3

0

17:4

5

19:0

0

20:1

5

21:3

0

22:4

5

0:00

Time of day / hours

NO

, NO

2, S

O2

/ ug

m-3

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

CO

, CH

4, N

MH

C /

ug

m-3

NO NO2 SO2

CH4 CO NMHC

Page 9: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

Calculated from data: www.chmi.cz

Diurnal variation of PM10 concentrations averaged over half a year 2004 at the CHMI sites in Prague center

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

700

:00

1:3

0

3:0

0

4:3

0

6:0

0

7:3

0

9:0

0

10

:30

12

:00

13

:30

15

:00

16

:30

18

:00

19

:30

21

:00

22

:30

Daytime / hours

PM

10

/ u

gm

-3

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

NO

x /

ug

m-3

avg Branik PM10 avg Branik NOx

avg Rieger NOx avg Rieger PM10

avg Veleslavin NOx avg Veleslavin PM10

Page 10: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

Diurnal variation of PM10(Beta), PM0.72(SMPS) and total particle number (14-710 nm) in Botanical garden,

Prague center 5.10.2004

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

701

:00

3:0

0

5:0

0

7:0

0

9:0

0

11

:00

13

:00

15

:00

17

:00

19

:00

21

:00

23

:00

Time of day / hours

PM

10

(Be

ta),

PM

0.7(S

MP

S)

/ u

gm

-3

0.0E+00

5.0E+03

1.0E+04

1.5E+04

2.0E+04

2.5E+04

3.0E+04

3.5E+04

4.0E+04

Pa

rtic

le n

um

be

r / c

m-3

BetaSMPS Total massSMPS Total number

Page 11: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

? SPECIFIC SITE ?

Recorded bimodal pattern is NOT site specific solely for our station but appeared at other sites situated near river valley

Similar pattern in diurnal variation also recorded in other cities in Europe with similar urban architecture and local geography

? AEROSOL TEMPORAL CHANGES?

Temporal variations of aerosol mass/number concentrations also exhibit similar pattern as gaseous components measured

Page 12: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

? SOURCES ?

• nucleation: NO up to 10 of true nucleation events (banana shape) recorded within measured period

• long-range transport: NO particle residence time too short, fast changes of number concentrations, bimodal pattern during low wind speed

• primary emissions from:

traffic

natural gas burning in major sources in proximity to the sampling site: Hospital heating plant Botanical garden boiler apartment/office boilers

Page 13: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

0.0E+00

5.0E+03

1.0E+04

1.5E+04

2.0E+04

2.5E+04

3.0E+04

3.5E+04

4.0E+04

4.5E+04

5.0E+04

10 100 1000

Dp / nm

dN/d

logD

p / c

m-3

1:002:003:004:005:006:007:008:009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:000:00

Hourly averages of particle number size distribution 5.10.2005, Prague.

Number

Page 14: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

Hourly averages of particle mass size distribution 5.10.2005, Prague.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

10 100 1000

Dp / nm

dm

/dlo

gD

p /

ug

m-3

1:002:003:004:005:006:007:008:009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:000:00

Mass

Page 15: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19

Daytime / hours

tra

ffic

de

ns

ity

/ c

ars

ho

ur-1

Hourly averages of traffic volumes at the intersection near University Botanical garden during working days (yellow)

and weekends (green)

Page 16: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

Data source: www.udi.cz

Page 17: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

0

100

200

300

400

500

6000

:00

1:1

2

2:2

4

3:3

6

4:4

8

6:0

0

7:1

2

8:2

4

9:3

6

10

:48

12

:00

13

:12

14

:24

15

:36

16

:48

18

:00

19

:12

20

:24

21

:36

22

:48

0:0

0

Time of day / hours

Na

tura

l g

as

co

ns

um

pti

on

/ m

3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Na

tura

l g

as

co

ns

um

pti

on

/ m

3

HospitalBotanic garden

Diurnal variation of natural gas burnup in Hospital heating plant and Botanic garden boiler in Prague center

on 5.10.2004

Page 18: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0:0

0

1:2

0

2:4

0

4:0

0

5:2

0

6:4

0

8:0

0

9:2

0

10

:40

12

:00

13

:20

14

:40

16

:00

17

:20

18

:40

20

:00

21

:20

22

:40

Time of day / hours

na

tura

l g

as

co

ns

um

pti

on

/ m

-3Diurnal pattern of 20 min values (Sep-Dec 2004) of natural

gas burnup by heating boiler in the Botanic garden

Page 19: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%0:

00

2:24

4:48

7:12

9:36

12:0

0

14:2

4

16:4

8

19:1

2

21:3

6

0:00

Time of day / hours

bo

iler

ou

tpu

tEstimated diurnal pattern of output of gas burning boilers in

residential districts

Page 20: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

First Second

Item Time of day / hours

Gaseous precursors 5:30-9:00 18:00-22:00

Aerosol Number 6:30-11:00 18:00-23:00

Aerosol Mass 6:30-11:00 18:00-23:00

Traffic volumes 7:00-9:00 15:00-18:30

Hospital heating plant 4:00-7:00

Botanic garden boiler 5:30-10:00

Residential boilers 4:00-6:00 18:00-22:00

Summary of peak values of gaseous precursors, aerosol concentrations and different sources outputs in Prague

Page 21: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

CONCLUSIONS• bimodal pattern of diurnal variation of aerosol concentration can be ascribed to traffic and natural gas burning as primary aerosol emission sources

• precise traffic and gas burning apportionment of total aerosol burden in urban atmosphere requires further data on gas burning boilers in residential areas

Page 22: J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **

Acknowledgment

Traffic counts performed by L.Betuš and V.Klapšťová. The station was built and maintained with help of M.Civiš.

The study was done within the scheme of project “Comprehensive characterization of atmospheric aerosol in Prague” No. 205/03/1560 of the Czech Grant Agency.