Upload
zilya
View
89
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
DIURNAL VARIATION OF SUBMICRON PM SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND GASEOUS POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS, PRAGUE 2004, POLLUTION SOURCE ESTIMATION. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. J. Hovorka*, M.Bra niš * , J.Schwarz **. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
*Institute for Environmental Studies, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01 Prague 2, Czech Republic
** Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova 135, 165 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic
J. Hovorka*, M.Braniš*, J.Schwarz**
DIURNAL VARIATION OF SUBMICRON PM SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS AND GASEOUS
POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS, PRAGUE 2004, POLLUTION SOURCE ESTIMATION
Motivation of our work• three years of our air monitoring revealed frequent (30% of days) bimodal pattern of diurnal variation of NOx, NMHC, CH4, CO partially SO2
• first mode 8-9 a.m. traffic rush hours
• second mode 8-10 p.m. NO rush hours
? ARE THESE MEASUREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC ?
? DOES AEROSOL BEHAVE SIMILARY?
? WHAT ARE LIKELY SOURCES?
Parameters determined
5 mins averages
• 14 – 710 nm aerosol size distribution (SMPS)
15 mins averages
• NO, NO2 , CO, SO2, CH4, Non-Methane HC, O3 (Horiba 360)
• temperature, humidity, UV-A,B, wind speed/direction
hourly averages
• PM10 by -attenuator,
• traffic volumes
• natural gas consumption in near-by stationary sources
Sampling site
• roof-top aerosol/gasses sampling in University botanical garden in the Prague city center
• at height about 25 m above the street
• no street canyon conditions
• duration 1.9.2004 – 31.12.2004
University University Botanic garden Botanic garden sampling sitesampling site
PRAGUE 2
Wind dire
ction
Hospital heating plant
University Botanic garden, roof-top sampling inlets
Roof-top sampling configuration
Diurnal variation of CO, NO, NO2, SO2, NMHC, CH4 in Botanical garden in Prague center, 5.10.2004
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2000:
15
1:30
2:45
4:00
5:15
6:30
7:45
9:00
10:1
5
11:3
0
12:4
5
14:0
0
15:1
5
16:3
0
17:4
5
19:0
0
20:1
5
21:3
0
22:4
5
0:00
Time of day / hours
NO
, NO
2, S
O2
/ ug
m-3
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
CO
, CH
4, N
MH
C /
ug
m-3
NO NO2 SO2
CH4 CO NMHC
Calculated from data: www.chmi.cz
Diurnal variation of PM10 concentrations averaged over half a year 2004 at the CHMI sites in Prague center
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
700
:00
1:3
0
3:0
0
4:3
0
6:0
0
7:3
0
9:0
0
10
:30
12
:00
13
:30
15
:00
16
:30
18
:00
19
:30
21
:00
22
:30
Daytime / hours
PM
10
/ u
gm
-3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
NO
x /
ug
m-3
avg Branik PM10 avg Branik NOx
avg Rieger NOx avg Rieger PM10
avg Veleslavin NOx avg Veleslavin PM10
Diurnal variation of PM10(Beta), PM0.72(SMPS) and total particle number (14-710 nm) in Botanical garden,
Prague center 5.10.2004
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
701
:00
3:0
0
5:0
0
7:0
0
9:0
0
11
:00
13
:00
15
:00
17
:00
19
:00
21
:00
23
:00
Time of day / hours
PM
10
(Be
ta),
PM
0.7(S
MP
S)
/ u
gm
-3
0.0E+00
5.0E+03
1.0E+04
1.5E+04
2.0E+04
2.5E+04
3.0E+04
3.5E+04
4.0E+04
Pa
rtic
le n
um
be
r / c
m-3
BetaSMPS Total massSMPS Total number
? SPECIFIC SITE ?
Recorded bimodal pattern is NOT site specific solely for our station but appeared at other sites situated near river valley
Similar pattern in diurnal variation also recorded in other cities in Europe with similar urban architecture and local geography
? AEROSOL TEMPORAL CHANGES?
Temporal variations of aerosol mass/number concentrations also exhibit similar pattern as gaseous components measured
? SOURCES ?
• nucleation: NO up to 10 of true nucleation events (banana shape) recorded within measured period
• long-range transport: NO particle residence time too short, fast changes of number concentrations, bimodal pattern during low wind speed
• primary emissions from:
traffic
natural gas burning in major sources in proximity to the sampling site: Hospital heating plant Botanical garden boiler apartment/office boilers
0.0E+00
5.0E+03
1.0E+04
1.5E+04
2.0E+04
2.5E+04
3.0E+04
3.5E+04
4.0E+04
4.5E+04
5.0E+04
10 100 1000
Dp / nm
dN/d
logD
p / c
m-3
1:002:003:004:005:006:007:008:009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:000:00
Hourly averages of particle number size distribution 5.10.2005, Prague.
Number
Hourly averages of particle mass size distribution 5.10.2005, Prague.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
10 100 1000
Dp / nm
dm
/dlo
gD
p /
ug
m-3
1:002:003:004:005:006:007:008:009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:000:00
Mass
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19
Daytime / hours
tra
ffic
de
ns
ity
/ c
ars
ho
ur-1
Hourly averages of traffic volumes at the intersection near University Botanical garden during working days (yellow)
and weekends (green)
Data source: www.udi.cz
0
100
200
300
400
500
6000
:00
1:1
2
2:2
4
3:3
6
4:4
8
6:0
0
7:1
2
8:2
4
9:3
6
10
:48
12
:00
13
:12
14
:24
15
:36
16
:48
18
:00
19
:12
20
:24
21
:36
22
:48
0:0
0
Time of day / hours
Na
tura
l g
as
co
ns
um
pti
on
/ m
3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Na
tura
l g
as
co
ns
um
pti
on
/ m
3
HospitalBotanic garden
Diurnal variation of natural gas burnup in Hospital heating plant and Botanic garden boiler in Prague center
on 5.10.2004
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0:0
0
1:2
0
2:4
0
4:0
0
5:2
0
6:4
0
8:0
0
9:2
0
10
:40
12
:00
13
:20
14
:40
16
:00
17
:20
18
:40
20
:00
21
:20
22
:40
Time of day / hours
na
tura
l g
as
co
ns
um
pti
on
/ m
-3Diurnal pattern of 20 min values (Sep-Dec 2004) of natural
gas burnup by heating boiler in the Botanic garden
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%0:
00
2:24
4:48
7:12
9:36
12:0
0
14:2
4
16:4
8
19:1
2
21:3
6
0:00
Time of day / hours
bo
iler
ou
tpu
tEstimated diurnal pattern of output of gas burning boilers in
residential districts
First Second
Item Time of day / hours
Gaseous precursors 5:30-9:00 18:00-22:00
Aerosol Number 6:30-11:00 18:00-23:00
Aerosol Mass 6:30-11:00 18:00-23:00
Traffic volumes 7:00-9:00 15:00-18:30
Hospital heating plant 4:00-7:00
Botanic garden boiler 5:30-10:00
Residential boilers 4:00-6:00 18:00-22:00
Summary of peak values of gaseous precursors, aerosol concentrations and different sources outputs in Prague
CONCLUSIONS• bimodal pattern of diurnal variation of aerosol concentration can be ascribed to traffic and natural gas burning as primary aerosol emission sources
• precise traffic and gas burning apportionment of total aerosol burden in urban atmosphere requires further data on gas burning boilers in residential areas
Acknowledgment
Traffic counts performed by L.Betuš and V.Klapšťová. The station was built and maintained with help of M.Civiš.
The study was done within the scheme of project “Comprehensive characterization of atmospheric aerosol in Prague” No. 205/03/1560 of the Czech Grant Agency.