Upload
mae
View
18
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
IRI Experience in Forecasting and Applications for the Mercosur Countries. Purely Empirical (observational) approach. Mason & Goddard, 2001, Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc. Prediction Systems: statistical vs. dynamical system. ADVANTAGES Based on actual, real-world - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
IRI Experience in Forecastingand Applications for the
Mercosur Countries
Mason & Goddard, 2001, Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc.
PurelyEmpirical(observational)approach
Prediction Systems:statistical vs. dynamical system
ADVANTAGES
Based on actual, real-worldobserved data. Knowledge ofphysical processes not needed.
Many climate relationshipsquasi-linear, quasi-Gaussian------------------------------------Uses proven laws of physics.Quality observational data not required (but helpful for val-idation). Can handle casesthat have never occurred.
DISADVANTAGES
Depends on quality and length of observed data
Does not fully account for climate change, or new climate situations.------------------------------ Some physical laws must be abbreviated or statis- tically estimated, leading to errors and biases.
Computer intensive.
Stati-stical
-------
Dyna-mical
Dynamical Prediction System:2-tiered vs. 1-tiered forecast system ADVANTAGES
Two-way air-sea interaction,as in real world (required Where fluxes are as important as large scale ocean dynamics)
-------------------------------------More stable, reliable SST inthe prediction; lack of driftthat can appear in 1-tier system
Reasonably effective for regionsimpacted most directly by ENSO
DISADVANTAGES
Model biases amplify (drift); flux corrections
Computationally expensive------------------------------ Flawed (1-way) physics, especially unacceptable in tropical Atlantic and Indian oceans (monsoon)
1-tier
-------
2-tier
30
12
30
12
10
24
10
24
10
FORECAST SST
TROP. PACIFIC: THREE (multi-models, dynamical and statistical)
TROP. ATL, INDIAN (ONE statistical)
EXTRATROPICAL (damped persistence)
GLOBAL ATMOSPHERIC
MODELS
ECPC(Scripps)
ECHAM4.5(MPI)
CCM3.6(NCAR)
NCEP(MRF9)
NSIPP(NASA)
COLA2
GFDL
ForecastSST
Ensembles3/6 Mo. lead
PersistedSST
Ensembles3 Mo. lead
IRI DYNAMICAL CLIMATE FORECAST SYSTEM
POSTPROCESSING
MULTIMODELENSEMBLING
PERSISTED
GLOBAL
SST
ANOMALY
2-tiered OCEAN ATMOSPHERE
30
(1) NCEP CFS(2) LDEO
(3) CPC Constr AnalogIRI CCA CPTEC
CCA
dampedpersistence
damped persistence
0.25--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
Method of Forming 3 SST Predictions for Climate Predictions
Method of Forming 4th SST Prediction for Climate Predictions
(4)Anomaly
persistence
from most
recently
observed
month
(all oceans)
Atmospheric General Circulation Models Used in the IRI's Seasonal Forecasts, for Superensembles
Name Where Model Was Developed Where Model Is Run
NCEP MRF-9 NCEP, Washington, DC QDNR, Queensland, Australia
ECHAM 4.5 MPI, Hamburg, Germany IRI, Palisades, New York
NSIPP NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD
COLA COLA, Calverton, MD COLA, Calverton, MD
ECPC SIO, La Jolla, CA SIO, La Jolla, CA
CCM3.6 NCAR, Boulder, CO IRI, Palisades, New York
GFDL GFDL, Princeton, NJ GFDL, Princeton, NJ
Collaboration on Input to Forecast Production
Sources of the Global Sea Surface Temperature Forecasts
Tropical Pacific Tropical Atlantic Indian Ocean Extratropical Oceans
NCEP Coupled CPTEC Statistical IRI Statistical Damped PersistenceLDEO Coupled Constr Analogue
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 | || ||| ||||.| || | | || | | | . | | | | | | | | | |
Rainfall Amount (mm)
Below| Near | Below| Near | Above Below| Near |
The tercile-based category system:Below, near, and above normal
(30 years of historical data for a particular location & season)
Forecasts of the climate
Data:
33% 33% 33%Probability:
JUL | Aug-Sep-Oct* Sep-Oct-Nov
Oct-Nov-DecNov-Dec-Jan
Monthly issued probability forecasts of seasonal global precipitation and temperature
*probabilities of extreme (low and high) 15% issued also
Four lead times - example:
OND 1997 OND 1998
verygoodskill
goodskill
OND 1999 OND 2000
somewhatnegative
skillfairlygoodskill
OND 2001 OND 2002
Neutral(zero)skill good
skill
OND 2003 OND 2004
negativeskill
neutral(zero)skill
Historical skill using actually observed SST
Ensemble mean (10 members)
Historical skill using actually observed SST
Ensemble mean (24 members)
OND
JFM
AMJ
JAS
ONDPrecip1950-2000
SouthAmerica
Europe North America
TropicalAmericas
Indonesia
Australia/Indonesia
Some Themes in Customer Demands:
1. Higher skills in existing products: -Tighter range of possibilities2. More usable and easily understood product3. Expansion of repertoire of products beyond seasonally averaged climate
Specifically, users consistently request:More concrete forecast format Direct use of physical units (inches, degr C) Best guess quantity, with comparison to average More flexibility in probabilistic forecast format
More temporal detail than 3 month averages Outlooks for single months, even at long lead Rainy season (or monsoon) onset time Weather features within season (e.g. dry spells) Chance of extreme event (storm, flood, drought)
Climate change nowcast (the new “normal”)
Almost all users want reliable probabilities (probabilities that would match observed frequencies of occurrence over a large sample of identical forecasts).
Even if reliable, users for some applications are not impressed with slight changes from the climatological precipitation probabilities. They are interested inforecasts having probabilities that deviate strongly from the neutral, climatological probabilities.
OND 1997
Ranked Probability Skill Score (RPSS)
3 prob prob
RPSfcst = (Fcsticat – Obsicat)2
icat=1
icat ranges from 1 (below normal) to 3 (above normal)
icat is cumulative, from 1 to icat
RPSS = 1 - (RPSfcst / RPSclim)
RPSclim is RPS of forecasts of climatology (33%,33%,33%)
Real-timeForecast
Skill(from Goddard
et al. 2003,BAMS, p1761)
Real-timeForecast
Skill(from Goddard
et al. 2003,BAMS, p1761)
Real-timeForecast
Skill(from Goddard
et al. 2003,BAMS, p1761
1998-2001 Reliability Diagram
from Barnston et al. 2003, BAMS, p1783
Reliability Diagram
longer “AMIP”period
from Goddardet al. 2003
(EGS-AGU-EUG)
IRI Forecast Information Pages on the Web
IRI Home Page: http://iri.columbia.edu/
ENSO Quick Look:http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/currentinfo/QuickLook.html
IRI Probabilistic ENSO Forecast:http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/currentinfo/figure3.html
Current Individual Numerical Model Climate Forecastshttp://iri.columbia.edu/forecast/climate/prec03.html
Individual Numerical Model Hindcast Skill Mapshttp://iri.columbia.edu/forecast/climate/skill/SkillMap.html
Current Multi-model Climate Forecastshttp://iri.columbia.edu/forecast/climate/multi_model2003.html