31
Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Baylor College of Medicine Project Co-Director RRTC on Community Integration in Persons With TBI Memorial Hermann/TIRR

Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing

Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D.Assistant Professor

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Baylor College of Medicine

Project Co-Director RRTC on Community Integration in Persons With TBI

Memorial Hermann/TIRR

Page 2: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Intimacy

• “Close or warm friendship”

• “A usually secretive or illicit sexual relationship”

• “a feeling of being intimate and belonging together”

Webster’s online dictionary

Page 3: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Intimacy

“a relation into which fools are providentially drawn for their mutual destruction”

The Devil’s Dictionary by: Ambrose Bierce

Page 4: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Intimacy

“Intimacy is the basis of friendship and one of the bases of love. It may take several forms. The main ones are emotional intimacy and physical intimacy.”

Webster’s online dictionary

Page 5: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

For the purpose of this presentation..

Intimacy= emotional and physical closeness between two or more people involved in a romantic relationship – Emotional – Physical/Sexual

Page 6: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

What We Know About Emotional Intimacy After TBI

Page 7: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

“Characterological” Changes After TBI” (Lezak, 1978)

• “…impaired capacity for social perceptiveness”; “…empathy and self-reflective or self-critical attitudes are greatly diminished if not lacking altogether”

• “…impaired capacity for control and self-regulation gives rise to impulsivity, random restlessness, and impatience.”

• “…decreased or absent behavioral initiative…”

Page 8: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

“Characterological” Changes After TBI” (Lezak, 1978)

• “apathy, silliness, lability, irritability, and either greatly increased sexual interest or a virtual loss of the sex drive.”

• “…inability to profit from experience compromises the patient’s capacity for social learning….”

Page 9: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Marital Discord After TBI

• Rosenbaum & Najenson (1976)- Compared to wives of men with paraplegia and controls, wives of men with TBI at 1 year post-injury,– Reported their husbands as “childlike”, dependent

and “self-oriented”

– Rated the role of “being a sexual partner” as lower; “dislike of physical contact with husband”

– Reported that they did not feel close to their husbands

Page 10: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Marital Discord After TBI

• Panting & Merry (1972)- 40% separation/divorce rate up to 7 years post-injury

• Bond (1984)- Spouses who were younger and married more recently were less likely to remain in the relationship.

• Thomsen (1989)- 7 of 9 married couples had divorced at 15-year follow-up

Page 11: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Marital Discord After TBI

• Peters et al. (1990)- 55 males recruited from past patients with mild to severe (primarily mild to moderate) at a hospital in Winnepeg

– Wives of men with severe injuries reported lower total marital adjustment, less dyadic consensus, and lower expression of affection within their marriage.

Page 12: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Marital Discord After TBI

• Recent studies show divorce rates ranging from 15% to 54% (Tate et al., 1989; Anderson-Parente, 1990; Wood & Yurdakul, 1997; Webster et al., 1999; Wood et al., 2005; Kreutzer et al., 2007).

• Older persons less likely to divorce (Andersen-Parente, 1990; Kreutzer et al., 2007)

• Persons married longer prior to injury more likely to stay together (Kreutzer et al., 2007).

Page 13: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

What We Don’t Know About Emotional Intimacy

• Lack of prospective, consecutive samples; primarily convenience samples or clinic samples

• Most had as a focus burden on uninjured spouse, mainly female– Lack of information on intimacy in unmarried persons

(single, gay) – Lack of information on intimacy when female is injured – Lack of information on perceptions of intimacy from the

person with injury

• How does intimacy change over time?

Page 14: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

What We Know About

Sexual Intimacy After TBI

Page 15: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Changes in Sexual Functioning After TBI

• Up to 58% of males report decreased sexual functioning in one or more of the following areas:– Failure to obtain or maintain erections– Decreased desire– Decreased ability to achieve orgasm– Ejaculatory dysfunction– Decreased frequency of sexual activity– Overall decreased quality and satisfaction

Kosteljanetz et al., 1981; Kreutzer & Zasler, 1989; Blackerby, 1990; Kreuter et al., 1998; Ponsford, 2003

Page 16: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Changes in Sexual Functioning After TBI

• Females seldom investigated as a separate group– Hibbard et al. (2000)- Compared to women

without disability, women with TBI• Reported less energy for sex• Decreased sex drive• Decreased initiation of sexual activity• Decreased ability to achieve orgasm• Decreased sexual arousal

Page 17: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

– Hibbard et al. (2000)- Compared to women without disability, women with TBI• Pain during sexual activity• Decreased ability to masturbate• Decreased vaginal lubrication• Greater difficulty with positioning and

movement• Decreased sensation• Decreased body image

Page 18: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Hypersexuality After TBI

• Occurs rarely

• Result of general disinhibition/inability to self-monitor

• Case studies indicate that this behavior is very distressing to family members when it does occur, increasing its salience.

Miller et al., 1986; Zencius et al., 1990)

Page 19: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Possible Causes for Change in Sexual Functioning

• Primary Causes – Direct damage to parts of brain involved in

sexual functioning • posterior cortex- temporal lobe, amygdala,

hippocampus• Anterior cortex- frontal lobe, cingulate gyrus• Hypothalamus

• Endocrine dysfunction– Hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal system

Page 20: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Possible Causes for Change in Sexual Functioning

• Secondary causes– Physical deficits- hemiparesis, spasticity,

decreased balance– Cognitive deficits- distractibility, speed of

processing, social communication, initiation– Emotional changes- depression, apathy,

impulsivity– Social isolation– Medication effects

Page 21: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

What We Don’t Know About Sexuality After TBI

• Lack of standardized measures

• Lack of models explaining contributing factors

• Lack of accounting for non-injury factors that could impact sexual functioning, such as age

• Lack of information of impact on partner’s sexual functioning and satisfaction

• What treatments work best and when?

Page 22: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Interventions for Intimacy

Page 23: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Prigatano (1989)

Work, love, and play as symbols to guide persons with brain injury in the recovery process.

What do we, as rehabilitation professionals, do to address love?

Page 24: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Recommended Treatment Programs to Address Sexuality After TBI

• Staff development/sensitivity training: beginning in inpatient rehabilitation– Values assessment in staff– Education– Training in approach to addressing sexuality with

persons with TBI and family members

Blackerby, 1990; Ducharme & Gill, 1990; Ducharme, 1993; Aloni & Katz, 2003

Page 25: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Recommended Treatment Programs to Address Sexuality After TBI

• Education of Persons With TBI and family members– Psychoeducation beginning with inpatient rehabilitation

• Therapy with persons with TBI – Training in compensation for cognitive deficits – Social skills training– Role playing– Practice in community– Marital and/or couples counseling– Sex therapy– Use of sexual surrogates

Page 26: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

No empirical data on treatments for sexuality and/or emotional intimacy

Page 27: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Focus group • 5 persons with TBI; 1 spouse; 1 fiance; 1 parent

• All had participated in comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation at 1 of 2 facilities associated with Level I trauma centers

• None had received any information on potential changes in sexual functioning and how to deal with them.

• None had been asked about sexual functioning during the course of rehabilitation or during follow-up clinic visits

Page 28: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

RRTC Intimacy Project

• Collaboration with Carol Gill, Ph.D. and Nina Robins, Ph.D. at UIC

• Qualitative interviews with 18 couples (18 persons with TBI and an intimate partner)

• Conducted separately with each member of couple

• Range of age, ethnicity, sexual orientation, number of years in relationship, and whether they were together before injury

• 6-month follow-up

Page 29: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Changes in Intimacy According to Persons With Injury

“…I was 17 at the time of the accident so and…I was never intimate with anybody before the accident so I don’t know if there’s a change. My husband says that I’m not intimate I don’t show my feelings I don’t show my love I don’t show affection and to me I think I do but to him I don’t show it.”

Page 30: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Changes in Intimacy According to Persons With Injury

“There’s sometime that I’m like I don’t want it and she’s like ‘why I’m right here’ and its like I’m just not in the mood, it’s just that I’m not interested. I get interested then I’m not interested. It goes back and forth and its either sometimes I do want to be with her and sometimes I don’t.”

Page 31: Intimacy After Traumatic Brain Injury: What We Know and What We Are Guessing Angelle M. Sander, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine

Changes in Intimacy According to Persons With Injury

“…you can’t walk up to your spouse and hug her when you want to because your cane’s in the way… whereas previously if she’s standing up or whatever I could walk up there and put my arms around her easy. Now I’m making so much noise and I’m moving so slow that she knows I’m there, she knows I’m coming…and that to me is part of it what feeds a relationship is being able to do those little things that people didn’t ask for but they like getting it. I can’t do that as easily or cleverly for the impact- it’s not the same. Sort of the sponataneity of it….”