5
‘Innovation Policy in University City Regions’ INNOPOLIS Elena Vasilieva – University of Salford Project Manager

‘Innovation Policy in University City Regions’ INNOPOLIS Elena Vasilieva – University of Salford Project Manager

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ‘Innovation Policy in University City Regions’ INNOPOLIS Elena Vasilieva – University of Salford Project Manager

‘Innovation Policy in University City Regions’

INNOPOLIS

Elena Vasilieva – University of Salford

Project Manager

Page 2: ‘Innovation Policy in University City Regions’ INNOPOLIS Elena Vasilieva – University of Salford Project Manager

UoL

Part A of Learning outputs (Task 3.9)

Guide to KE for Policymakers

AUPart B of Learning outputs (Task 3.12)Guide to Best Policy

Practices for Policymakers

UoSPart C of Learning outputs (Task 3.15)

Policy Simulation Guide

AUThQuantitative KE Analysis

Task 3.3

AU 10 Multimedia Case Studies of KE (Task 3.4)

UoLTemplate for Qualitative Analysis

Task 3.3 UK

Case Studies of KE

FinCase Studies of KE

GreCase Studies of KE

PolCase Studies of KE

UKQualitative Analysis of

UK KE Cases

FinQualitative Analysis of

Fin KE Cases

GreQualitative Analysis of

Greek KE Cases

PolQualitative Analysis of

Polish KE Cases

AUTh125 KE Cases and Interviews

AllInternational cases of BPPs (wider context) – Australia (M:KC & Japan (SEERC) outstanding

UoSExperiential Learning Manual (Task 3.14)

UoSBest Policy simulation (Task 3.13)

2 best policy transfer experiments (events) in Lodz & Thessaloniki (run simultaneously)

UK BPP cases

Finland BPP Cases

Greece BPP Cases (3 outstanding)

Poland BPP cases (5 outstanding)

AUTh Template of BPP

BPP Audit (Task 3.10)

UoLTask 3.11 Identification of 4 BPP (one per region)

Page 3: ‘Innovation Policy in University City Regions’ INNOPOLIS Elena Vasilieva – University of Salford Project Manager

What was done in Semester 4 Component 1• 3rd Progress Report• 5th Partners meeting

Component 2 • 4th Project Newsletter - 15th November 2011• 3rd Across Europe PR – 30th November 2011• 2 regional PRs - Thessaloniki ?(30th September) & Helsinki (15th December) • Component 3 • Part A of learning outputs Task 3.9 (results of Task 3.3 & task 3.4 – UoL) • BPP Audit (Task 3.10) plus identification of BPP in wider context • 4 BPP case studies (Task 3.11) –UoL• Developing of part B of learning outputs (Task 3.12) – AU• BPP transfer simulation – UoS• Prague Study visit• Organisation of US visit (April 2012)

Page 4: ‘Innovation Policy in University City Regions’ INNOPOLIS Elena Vasilieva – University of Salford Project Manager

Events & Activities in S5 & S6

CP 1

•4th Progress report - 31/3/2012 (all signed docs to UoS by 28/2/2012)

•6th Partner meeting – April - May 2012

•Evaluation report – 30/6/2012 ??

•5th Progress report – 30/9/2012

•6th Progress report – ?

•Final Report - ?

CP2

•National Launch Events (Manchester & Helsinki) – February 2012

•Final Dissemination Conference in Thessaloniki – Oct 2012 (8-9 Oct or 11-12 Oct)

•5th newsletter – June 2012

•4th across Europe PR – June 2012

•2 ad-hoc regional/national (Manchester April 2012 & Lodz – March 2012) PRs - ?

•6th Newsletter•5th across Europe PR •INNOPOLIS issue

(European Journal of Innovation Management) - ?

CP3

•US Study visit – April - May 2012

•2 Experiment Events + Launch events (Thessaloniki & Lodz) – end Feb 2012

•Simulation & Experiential Guide (part C of Learning outputs)

Page 5: ‘Innovation Policy in University City Regions’ INNOPOLIS Elena Vasilieva – University of Salford Project Manager

Evaluation Interim Report Conclusions:• Target groups (until now) that are actively involved in the project are university

stakeholders not policy makers • Under condition that policy makers are more strongly involved in

implementation & dissemination activities the project may have a more strategic impact resulting in future activities of transferring good practices

Recommendations:• Use project website as a main tool for collaboration between partners• Upload all project output into website on time available for the public • Remaining KE outputs should provide guidelines for policy makers• Target groups should include policy makers & enterprises as well as academic

stakeholder• Develop tools for collecting information about the progress of the project

activities• Collaboration with other similar projects • Ensure sustainability of the project results