5
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (C)NO.2276 OF 2012 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.14381 OF 2012 Association of Radio and Television Engineering Employees and others ....... Petitioners versus Union of India and others ....... Respondents o Cerw· ftot''l--tn R D E R ta'nt~~(a'"'i (Judl.) .....•. 2013 St~f6N1~ Court of India Review Petit!on--<~LNo. 2276 of 2012 Delay condoned. In this petition filed under Order 40 read with Order 47 Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966, the petitioners have prayed for review of order dated 27.4.2012 by which SLP(C) No. 14381 of 2012 was dismissed. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. While dismissing Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.33048 of 2011 filed by the Union of India against the order of the Madras High Court this Court held that the direction given by the High Court for paYment of salary to Staff Artists of Doordarshan at par with Lighting Assistants Grade-II and Grade-I was legally correct. In view of the above, order dated 27.04.2012 passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No .14381 of 2012 1S ,.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...arteeindia.org/courtorders/ORDERReviewPetitionTechVsLA.pdf2,. recalled and the special leave petition is restored to its original number

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...arteeindia.org/courtorders/ORDERReviewPetitionTechVsLA.pdf2,. recalled and the special leave petition is restored to its original number

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION (C)NO.2276 OF 2012IN

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.14381 OF 2012

Association of Radio and TelevisionEngineering Employees and others .......Petitioners

versus

Union of India and others .......Respondents

o

Cerw· ftot''l--tn

R D E R ta'nt~~(a'"'i (Judl.).....•. 2013

St~f6N1~ Court of IndiaReview Petit!on--<~L No. 2276 of 2012

Delay condoned.In this petition filed under Order 40 read with

Order 47 Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966, the petitionershave prayed for review of order dated 27.4.2012 by which SLP(C)No. 14381 of 2012 was dismissed.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties andperused the record.

While dismissing Special Leave Petition (Civil)No.33048 of 2011 filed by the Union of India against the order ofthe Madras High Court this Court held that the direction given bythe High Court for paYment of salary to Staff Artists ofDoordarshan at par with Lighting Assistants Grade-II and Grade-Iwas legally correct.

In view of the above, order dated 27.04.2012passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil) No .14381 of 2012 1S

,.

Page 2: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...arteeindia.org/courtorders/ORDERReviewPetitionTechVsLA.pdf2,. recalled and the special leave petition is restored to its original number

2

,.

recalled and the special leave petition is restored to itsoriginal number.

Leave granted.Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in view

of order dated 10.1.2013 passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil)NO.33048 of 2011, relief in similar terms may be granted to themembers of appellant No.1 and other appellants.

Learned counsel for the respondents has not been able toput forward any tangible argument to controvert the submission ofthe appellants counsel.

We have considered the entire matter. Since similarlysituated persons have been granted relief, this appeal is allowedin terms of order dated 24.11.2010 passed by the Division Bench ofthe Madras High Court in Writ Petition No.27155 of 2009 read withorder dated 10.01.2013 passed in SLP(C)No.33048 of 2011.

The respondents are directed to give relief to themembers of appellant No.1 and other appellants as also othersimilarly situated persons in terms of order dated 10.01.2013passed by this Court in SLP(C)No. 33048/2011 approving thedirection given by the Madras High Court. The needful must be doneby the respondents within a period of three months from today .

........... ~~ J.(G.S.SINGHVI)

............)Jc~ J.(SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA)

NEW DELHI;SEPTEMBER 2, 2013.

.'

Page 3: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...arteeindia.org/courtorders/ORDERReviewPetitionTechVsLA.pdf2,. recalled and the special leave petition is restored to its original number

,.

Page 4: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...arteeindia.org/courtorders/ORDERReviewPetitionTechVsLA.pdf2,. recalled and the special leave petition is restored to its original number

Association of Radio & Television Engineering EmployeesPost Bor No 422 N€w C€lh ,110 001

1.,'1./d'il i \:/ l j.,.1',

ARTEE/GS/Mta/2013/09 Ddnd a(,n92013

Hon'ble Mlnisi6r for ttrfornarion & BroadcasrindMinillry ot Iniom.tion & 8.@dcerindNew Delhl.

Subjecl R.ca.sr to. p.v Evlsro, of fechnician in Dad Assls.,rt- NotionatFix.don o, Pav w-e.f. Ot .07,1983and with .M trcm LL7!86 in th. scrro As 50O0L80OO

Ref: t. y.rdict dar.d O?/'g/?Oti of Hd,,btc Aryftn. Colrt in p.nay p.tirion(ciit l,to.2r6/24t2 of sOG) ib. t 13ar,/zo,22. t.rr.r ilo.ARTEF/6s/sI8/20!3,/o7 dated o?o7/2013 subnitr.d to&.rero.t/. lqhishy of IAA.3. tllruE of the n . rg /pTE 4 ,D.EA hctd *irh b€,arp on !e,/6,/&r3niruE dar.d O4,/7/pO13 4 05,/07/20131. pccot n.n&ri@ dirtcd ?q/UZOTJ ft tn CEO. husc Br@tti to,t|istfl ofI4A ft-fixatiah of pay yith etars in the sotc Rs.&-6e;;;; ;'

, "t. t.1996-

5. y.'dli, &r.d !O/Ot.,,?Ot3 of tlonbt dryt rc a@r i. slp (c)t*'.33/1e of201t6. N.. No.Ztt!/Z@g_St, &tEd 26/4,12012 /rs!.d 4/ De: D@tdbrrhanyith

.th. ap?e@t of ,qid:rrry of L&R gt nhi,g W;b t X.W-& ,oLbhtirg Asststaat *...f-!.1.f996 *ith oft..;.

'*n*{r#{*r[,ffi['tiffi ;:iirti';ann@vemn ntto inotana the verclict withtn ti;e I

sir, h lhE maner I requesr your kjnd aflention ro the krsquested Mn,sty. pi""a. eh"-r,-C i;C-;ri i^ 'e-m6,and repe$ntatMs trtolshwhEh we

J:fll?ffi 3jit::,i:i1., ; ;ffi ffi ; :"ii,iti:1"ff li: i*,?,"llijlj.;,.:%li"l!:Panty in b€i,een tho edres of T€chnrcian of AtR

^,@o'o.6n6n has ben proved 0"".,0 o.,o, n,,n. .?.t-10-"rshar

a'd the Lghlrng Assstanl of

"a..."r"r ". ".0". r,i"iiil ';-"'il""l fl1,;I l;H';1ilf.":":T:::"r:ft ff"f"i.:il:;4II]LQIECcs

Page 5: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL ...arteeindia.org/courtorders/ORDERReviewPetitionTechVsLA.pdf2,. recalled and the special leave petition is restored to its original number

It may kindly be noted that Hon b e Sup€me Colrr in the verdicr dared 10.01 .2013 . StP (C) No.33048 of 2011 while upholding the decision ot Honble High Courl Chennaistated lhal'rln it.abonco of any cogent eplanation for dlfior.ndatlng th€ two cadres in th€ n.tter otr.vlJon of pay scal6, it is not pdlsible to fln.l any f.ult with th€ diEcrion glv€n by ih.Divi3ion Bonch of the High Court Rarh.r.lt mlgt be h.ld that bv orderind revision of orv3c.18 0frho Technicians at oar wiih rh. Lidhtino As.l.tenb. ihe Hioh coun h.s act d lncoBonan@ with rhe soirit of Anicbs I 'l and 'l6 ol tro Comlitulion."

In view ol lhe categori@l nnding of the Hon ble Supreme Coun on parily and in the lighl ol funhe.pay Gvision of Lighting Assislant ol O@rdachan we1.1.1.1996, we requesled lhe OG:AIR,Prasar tharali and ihe Minislry lo immedialey implemenl lhe judgment olthe Honble SupremeCovl and g6nt benefits of notio6l pay f*ation to tho f*hnicians for the penod sta.lingtom 1.7.1943 b 31.12.1995 at par with tha Lighttng Assisranbj Ancl rrcm 1.1.1996, thaTachnlclans shouL! be granted co'r,pLte pay pa ty with th. Lighting Assistants on th.basb of tha tudh.r rcvision ol pay scalo ol Llghtlng Assistants along dith atreers ot payand othel coftequenial benefil9.

Fu.the. il is lea.nt that DG: AIR & Prasa. Bhadti hav. already reconneneled lo Mlnitt y ofl&B for pay revision of Technician to naintain this paity. The obstacle poiDt d oul by theMinisty was the peDdins R.view PeAtua of ARTEE on the sade subj.ct.

We a€ very happy to infom your good ofiice lhai Hon ble Supreme Cou.t has nN settled themalter in i6 latesl jodgmeni, lhe te.hnical and legal obstacles now sland removed. DG:AIR &Prassr Bharali have already recommended for the implementation ol ihe pay pariry, it is .ow uprothe Minislry lo lake necessary sleps lo ensu€ long pending juslice lo lhe €dre of Technician ofAIR&DO

The emdoles all overthe @untry fell agilaled due lo the enEordinary delay in granl ot juslicelo lhe subodinale engineering cad.es, who a€ working i. 1800 stations ot AIR&DD lhroughoutlhe @untry lor lhe inieresl ol lhe Nation, inspite otlhe geogEphical& other difiicullies

Hence we request your good sell to kindly take necessary steps fo. thelmplementation of ehe judgmena of the Hon'bte supfeme coun at theea.liest by granting Notional Flxation trom 1.7,7943 to 3t.72.1995 anctfixation of pay in the pay scale of Ri,SOOO-aOOO w.e,t 1.7.t996 and Pa IIwlth GP ot RS,4ZOO/- we,t 7,1.2OO5 to the Technician aa Dar with theLightlng Ass,stants anct thereby to bing back the taith in the system.

i\- ! :oi+-[t'|]{Anilkumars)G.neral SeretaryPh:09418759192

E mail:aneanil@[email protected] se@@afteindia.oro

b)q,l1 "

''ii.t,,Copy lor lind infomalion to:

sh.i. BmalJulka lAS. Secrelary, Minislryol l&Bsh . Jawha.sir@r CEO, Prasar Bharati, NewoelhlSh . L D. Mandloi, IBPS, Dnedor Genera Alllndia Radlo,