Upload
spencer
View
54
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Impact A ssessment on O rganic M aterials in S elected European M useums IAQ, Padua, 10 - 12 Nov. 2004 Elin Dahlin and Terje Grøntoft Norwegian Institute for Air Research Joel Taylor and Nigel Blades, UCL Sara Rentmeister, ALU-FMF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
Impact Assessment on Organic Materials in Selected
European Museums
IAQ, Padua, 10 - 12 Nov. 2004
Elin Dahlin and Terje GrøntoftNorwegian Institute for Air Research
Joel Taylor and Nigel Blades, UCLSara Rentmeister, ALU-FMF
Mihalis Lazaridis and Thodoros Glytsos, TU-CreteChristopher Calnan, National Trust, Janusz Czop, National Museum Krakow, David Howell, Historic Royal Palaces, Anne Sommer-Larsen, Trøndelag Folk Museum, Christoph Pitzen, Würtembergisches Landesmuseum, John Azzopardi, Wignacourt Museum
MA
STER
E.M. Dahlin: master-mal.ppt slide 2
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
The MASTER ProjectEUK4-CT-2002-00093
”Preventive Conservation Strategies for Protection of Organic Objects in Museums, Historic Buildings and Archives”
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93Impact assessment on organic
material – problems to be solved In museums and
historic buildings all over Europe, objects made of organic materials are being affected either by display or by storage conditions because of unsuitable environmental conditions.
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93The Main Aim of the Project
To provide conservator staff of museums, historic buildings and archives with a new preventive conservation strategy for the protection of cultural property, based on an early warning system assessing the environmental impact on organic objects.
Up to now there has been no early warning tool for organic materials.
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
The Project partners
Norwegian Institute for Air Research, NILU, (NO)
University College London, (UK)
Alberts-Ludwigs Universität Freiburg, (DE)
Technical University of Crete, (GR)
National Museum in Krakow, (PL)
Historic Royal Palaces, (UK)
Trøndelag Folk Museum, (NO)
Subcontractors:• The National Trust, (UK)• The Consulting and Support Centre for the Museums of Baden Würtemberg, (DE)• Wignacourt Collegiate Museum, (ML)
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
Questionnaire about decay of organic collections in European museums, archives and historic
buildings
Developed by the partner; University College London,
Centre for Sustainable Heritage
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
Aims of questionnaire
Determine the kinds of monitoring carried out across Europe
Determine the perceived threats to organic collections
The motivations behind monitoring The kinds of damage found on organic
collections
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
Target institutions and responses
European museums, historic houses and archives were sent questionnaires to approx. 100 institutions
31 institutions of varying size from 18 different countries responded, from Finland to Malta, and Portugal to Hungary
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
Proportion of monitoring to institutions
0102030405060708090
100110
Parameters
Perc
enta
ge o
f mon
itorin
g
Museums (11)
Historic Houses (10)Archives (7)
J. Taylor, 2004
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93Types of damage noted by institutions
02468
101214161820
Risks
Freq
uenc
y
Number of institutions (26)
J. Taylor, 2004
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93Development of an Early Warning
System Assessment of environmental factors not
enough in order to understand the real effect on art objects
The knowledge of the actual reaction between the art object and the contaminant is crucial
Development of sensors which emulate the reaction between art objects and the contaminants and which give a measurable effect responce will be a useful Early Warning System
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93Development of the Early Warning
Sensor (EWO-sensor) Different organic polymers have been tested The intention is to develop a sensor that can
indicate the rate of chemical change, or damage, that objects are likely to suffer in a particular storage or display environment.
The main processes of chemical deterioration for organic objects involve either oxidation or acidic processes, or possibly a combination of both.
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93 The Early Warning Sensor (EWO-
sensor)
The EWO sensor is manufactured by spin coating the polymer onto a glass carrier. The production of EWO sensors is made by the partner Freiburg Material Research Centre
Chemical deterioration of certain polymers has shown to be detectable by simple techniques such as uv-visible spectrometry.
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
Field test sites The Museum of
Decorative Art & Design, Oslo, Norway
Trøndelag Folk Museum, Trondheim, Norway
Blickling Hall, Norfolk, UK Tower of London,
The Bloody Tower, London, UK
Haus der Geschichte Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart, Germany
Schwarzwälder Trachtenmuseum, Haslach, Germany
The Jan Matejko House, Krakow, Poland
The Karol Szymanowski Museum “Atma”, MNK Department in Zakopane, Poland
Wignacourt Collegiate Museum, Rabat, Malta
The Historical Museum of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
Field test exposure rack
EWO sensorsunshielded
EWO sensors,shielded
Passive gas samplers
Paper
Blue woolDosimeter
Silk
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
Tasks:1. Laboratory test: EWO response to controlled conc. of NO2, O3 and SO2. - Calibration
2. Field test: EWO response to measured conc. of NO2, O3 and SO2 in the museums.- Compare with lab. test. - Relate to real objects.
Laboratory and field testLaboratory and field test
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93Calibration curves
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0 50 100 150
Concentration (ppb)
Incr
ease
in a
bsor
ptio
n fa
ctor
NO2O3SO2
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0 50 100 150
Concentration (ppb)
Incr
ease
in a
bsor
ptio
n fa
ctor
NO2O3SO2NO2+O3
RH = 70 %
RH = 45 %
t = 21 daysT = 22oC
Laboratory test:
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
The field test programme
Duration 12 months 3 test sites in each museum:
Outdoor (A) In an open exhibition area (B) Inside a showcase (C)
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
1. EWO response
2. Environmental effect
a. Environmental parameter values
Passive gas samplers:
- NO2, SO2, O3, Org. Acids.
Logger data
- Temp, RH, Light (dust, number of visitors etc.)
b. Correlaton between environmental dose
(parameter values) and EWO response.
Results
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93EWO – response. All stations / locations. EWO 1S (T) March + April + May
-0.01
-0.005
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
1-Oslo
2-Tro
ndheim
3-Blic
kling H
all
4-Tower
of London
5-Stuttg
art
6-Has
lach
7-Krak
ow
8-Zak
opane
9-Wignac
ourt
10-C
rete
Cha
nge
in a
bs.fa
ctor
EWO1S A (T)
EWO 1S B (T)
EWO 1S C (T)
Field test:
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93NO2 concentrations. Location A, B and C
MARCH
05
1015
202530
3540
4550
9-Wign
acou
rt
2-Tron
dheim
3-Blic
kling
Hall
10-C
rete
8-Zak
opan
e
6-Has
lach
1-Oslo
7-Krak
ow
4-Tow
er of
Lond
on
5-Stut
tgart
NO
2 (m
ikro
g m
3 )
C
B
A
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93O3 concentrations. Location A, B and C
MARCH
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80O 3
(mik
rog
m3 )C
B
A
O3: Less variation in concentration than NO2
SO2: Very low concentrations
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93Organic acid concentrations. Location C
MARCH
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800O
rgan
ic a
cid
(mik
rog
m-3)
StdevFormic AcidAcetic Acid
Correlates negatively with NO2
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93Comparison between lab and field
tests
y = 0.0003x + 0.001R2 = 0.615
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Dose NO2 (microg m-3)
EW
O a
bsor
ptio
n re
spon
se (c
hang
e in
ab
s fa
ctor
)
March NO2, RH = 75 %April NO2, RH = 45 %May NO2+O3, RH = 45 %
Laboratory testField test
RH = 45 %
Trendline (linear regression)
y = 0.0003x + 0.001R2 = 0.615
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Dose NO2 (microg m-3)
EW
O a
bsor
ptio
n re
spon
se (c
hang
e in
ab
s fa
ctor
)
March NO2, RH = 75 %April NO2, RH = 45 %May NO2+O3, RH = 45 %
Laboratory testField test
RH = 45 %
Trendline (linear regression)
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
- Modelling of Indoor/outdoor (I/O)-ratio of NO2, O3 and SO2.
- Modelling of total flux of pollutants (NO2, O3 and SO2) to art objects exhibited indoors.
IMPACT - modellingIMPACT - modelling
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sustainableheritage/impact/
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
Input building parameters
brick
no material
synthetic carpet
plaster
no material
no material
no material
54
0
20
20
0
0
0
Wall mat 2
floor
ceiling
Surface 1
Surface 2
Surface 3
60 Internal volume m3
Wall mat 1 area (m2)
area (m2)
area (m2)
area (m2)
area (m2)
area (m2)
area (m2)
29%
Estimated indoorconcentration as % of outdoor
Pollutant deposition to materials (area weighted)
plaster 0.0207 #
synthetic 0.0239 #carpet
brick 0.0600 #
Pollutant indoor/oputdoor ratiovariation with air change rate
Pollutant gas •Input your environmental conditions
SO2 NO2 O3
Indoor temperature deg c
Air changes per hour
Outdoor temperature deg c
Air changes per day•
22
54
1.0
1.0
109
Relative humidity %
Wind speecd m/s
Model output
brick
plaster
synthetic carpet
0
0.5
1
0.0 1.0 2.0
Air change rate per hour
I/O
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sustainableheritage/impact/
IMPACT model estimating I/O concentrations
30Outdoor ppb
Materialvd(cm/s)
fluxgs-1
Total deposition
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93Example: Naturally ventilated buildings Wignacourt Museum, Rabat, Malta
Measurements of Environment:
Indoor temp : 22 oCOutdoor temp : 7 oCIndoor rel. hum : 74 %Average wind speed: 5 m s-1
Outdoor NO2 : 8.5 ppbIndoor NO2 : 4.5 ppb
Art material Area (m2)
Embroidered vestments (inside showcases)
26
Paintings 3
Wooden furniture (polished)
8
Room surface material
Area (m2) Surface material
Wall material 1 35 Globigerina Limestone
Wall material 2. 35 Glass in window panes as showcase
Floor 40 Cement tiles
Ceiling 40 Globigerina Limestone slabs and iron beams
Volume (m3)186
Model input:
MA
STER
E.Dahlin, T. Grøntoft, IAQ, Padua, 10-12 Nov.2004
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
Model output:
Indoor NO2 = 5 ppb
Total fluxes to the room surface materials (g s-1):Limestone (wall, ceiling)
: 0.127
Cloth (embroidered vestments)
: 0.046Fine concrete (cement floor tiles)
: 0.035Hard wood (furniture)
: 0.006Paintings
: 0.002Glass (window panes, showcase)
: 0.000
cloth concrete fine
wood, hard
paintings
limestone
MA
STER
E.M. Dahlin: master-mal.ppt slide 29
EU
K4-
CT-
2002
-000
93
For updating of the project please visit our web page:
www.nilu.no/master