Upload
kael
View
34
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
III Proven Techniques to Enhance Student Participation in Classroom . Student retention after 24 hours. 90%. Demonstrations. 70%. Teaching others. Student retention of information after 24 hours. 50%. Lectures. Reading materials. 25%. Discussions. 15%. 5%. Visual materials. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
III Proven Techniques to Enhance Student Participation in
Classroom
Student retention after 24 hours
5%15%
25%
50%
70%
90%
Stud
ent r
eten
tion
of
info
rmat
ion
afte
r 24
hour
s
Lectures
Reading materials
Visual materials
Demonstrations
Discussions
Teaching others
Geir (1994)
Demonst.
Lectures
Teac
hing
othersReadin
g
materia
ls
Discuss
ions
Visual
materia
ls
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 3
Effective Teaching Methods for Large Classes,J. Carpenter, U. South Carolina, 2006
Teaching method PercentMost Valuable Lecture + Discussion 38%
Lecture 20%Jigsaw 19%Case Study 13%Team Project 10%
Least Valuable Jigsaw 31%Lecture 30%Team Project 21%Case Study 18%Lecture + Discussion 0%
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 4
Effective Teaching Methods for Large Classes,J. carpenter, U. South Carolina, 2006
• Most students enjoy a blend that includes some component of active participation in combination with traditional structure through an organized lecture.
• Moderately-active learning methods are more effective than extreme active methods.
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 5
Passive
learning
Active learnin
g
Teacher-centered learning
Learner- centered learning
Out-of-Class
Hands-on
PBL
In-Class
Term Project
On-Line courses
TBLDQ
TPS
Jigsaw
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 6
We are after techniques that …• Engage Students• Can be applied in class• Do not require class or material
restructuring. • Therefore, they are:
– Less burden: Everyone can try– Less resistance from students– Build the “culture” of participation
gradually.
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 7
Why participatory classrooms?• Deeper Impact• Longer Retention• Enhance independent learning.• Improve student concentration.• Student ownership of their learning.• Development of interpersonal skills• More fun, less Boring (to student and instructor).• Improves student evaluation !• ….
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 8
III Techniques
• Discussion Questions • Think-Pair-Share
• Just jigsaw !
Discussion Questions
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 10
Why Do We Ask Questions ?
• Review of Material• Assess Student Understanding.• Draw Students Attention• Transitioning • Arousing Interest• Maintain Discipline • Create Discussion
(Questioning in the College Classroom, Ronald Hyman)
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 11
Why Discussion Questions ?
• DQ shift focus from teacher to student.
• DQ are means of converting lectures to dialogues.
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 12
Features of DQ
• Not YES/NO questions.• Designed for Higher Order of Thinking
• “2/3 of questions asked in a classroom required only recitation of a memorized text as a satisfactory answer” (1912)
• “Overwhelming proportion of questions asked by college professors were on the memory level”. (1982)
• Has anything changed?
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 13
Bloom’s Taxonomy:6 levels of Cognitive Thinking
Kno
wle
dge Com
preh
ensi
on
App
licat
ion
Ana
lysi
s Syn
thes
is
Eva
luat
ion
Describe, List, Define, name, state
Associate, compare, distinguish, differentiate, interpret, order
Apply, demonstrate, modify, prove, construct, develop, establish, use information in new situations.
Analyze, arrange, connect, divide, infer, classify, explain, correlate
Compose, generalize, plan, substitute, create, formulate, integrate, design, anticipate, compile, negotiate, "what if"
Assess, convince, conclude, judge, support, criticize, defend.
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 14
Why HOT Questions?
• More stimulating than purely descriptive questions.
• Those who “do not remember” can participate
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 15
And …
• Phrase your question Clearly.– What did we say about FS ? !
• Ask one thing at a time:– What are the disadvantages of X, can we
remove them all, how and at what cost ?!• Write Down Your Questions.
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 16
Response Time• Rowe (1974, cited in
Baumeister, 1992; Stahl, 1994), – When teachers ask questions
they typically wait one second or less for the answer.
– Once the student has replied they give feedback or start the next question within a second as well.
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 17
By extending wait time to few seconds…
• There were significant improvements in language use, attitudes and teacher expectations.
• Promotes higher levels of participation and longer responses.
• The frequency of “I don’t know” responses decreases.
(Gambrell, 1983; McTighe,1988; Stahl, 1994).
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 18
Response Time, How Much?
• Allows nearly every student to complete the thinking needed for the task.
• Matches the “HOT” required.• Takes into consideration the Language
Barrier.• Keeps students on board.
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 19
Watch Your Feedback• Reinforce good responses.• Praise the student in a strong
positive way– “Absolutely correct”. “I like that”.
• Make comments pertinent to the student response– You were so careful to include all
the conditions.• Build on Students responses
every now and then.
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 20
Student-Generated Questions• We learn by asking questions more than
we do by answering them– What is harder for us, setting exams or
solving them?• “It is better to ask some of the questions
than it is to know all the answers”• Let students form their questions and
others answer them.
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 Part I 21
Think-Pair-Share (TPS)
T P S
Teacher poses
Q
22Oct 11, 2010 III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010
THINK Phase
• Advantages:– To promote self-thinking.– To engage more students in the thinking
process, unlike the case of the traditional methods.In college classrooms of fewer than 40 students, 10-15% of students do 70-75% of the talking. (20-80 principle)
23Oct 11, 2010 III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010
PAIR Phase
Think
Think
Share
SharePair
Why…
and not …
??24Oct 11, 2010 III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010
PAIR• Advantages:
– Guaranteeing that everyone would have thought in the THINK phase.
– Refining their thinking as well as the language used to explain their perceptions in a non-threatening environment.
– Students in many instances learn better from each other then from their instructor.
25Oct 11, 2010 III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010
PAIR• Advantages:
– Realizing the benefits of sharing ideas with peers.
– Less confident students have the opportunity to rehearse their ideas and be encouraged to present them in front of the class.
– To Improve the communication skills with colleagues of the same level.
26Oct 11, 2010 III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010
SHARE• Advantages:
– Students who would never speak up in class are now both required and enabled to participate.
– The classroom is no longer dominated by a few students, but is open for contribution from all.
27Oct 11, 2010 III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010
Management of TPS
• Manage the “Think time”, “Pair time” & “Share time”. The longer the time “less discipline” environment is more likely to happen.
28Oct 11, 2010 III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010
Management of TPS
• Monitor the discussions for common misconceptions and unique ideas to address later with the whole group.
• Mix it up, students should be given an opportunity to “think” with a variety of partners.
29Oct 11, 2010 III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010
Jigsaw
Oct 12, 2010 III Techniques for Participation 30
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 Part I 31
Advantages of Jigsaw
• Every student learns from his peers.
• Every student teaches his colleagues.
• Cooperation by Design• Typical for problem
solving sessions.
Oct 12, 2010 III Techniques for Participation 32
STEPS
Oct 12, 2010 III Techniques for Participation 33
Set of Problems
home group
expert group
home group
Home and Expert Groups
Oct 12, 2010 III Techniques for Participation 34
Home Groups
ExpertGroups
Continue
• A comprehensive quiz is given at the end of the chapter to individuals.
• The class layout needs little adjustment• The instructor goes around to facilitate the
work of the groups when needed.• Some groups may complete the task early.
Prepare some time filling.
Oct 12, 2010 III Techniques for Participation 35
III Techniques for Participation
Students Comments on JIGSAW
• We act spontaneously.• We ask all types of silly question, never dare to put to the
instructor.• Practice our teaching skills.• We can discuss in Arabic• Assess our understanding of the subject.• Rank oneself against other students.• No chance to feel bored or sleepy.• Time passes very fast.• Some room for fun
Oct 12, 2010 36
النوم • ويجيب جدا ممله الحصهالشرح ... • في ستايله الجامعه في قديييييييييييم دكتور
... + يكتبون ... ناس اكثر طالبه طبشوره سبوره قديمالجامعه ... في نوت
البعد • مملللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللل بصراحهالملل درجات
التفكير .. .. • على الطالب يحفز دائما التووب في شرحة . القبعه له ترفع ،، جد من جدا ممتع كالسه
في • اسلوبه الرجل، هذا على الله تبارك الله ماشاءمن الطالب وبين بينه البناء والحوار النقاش هو الشرح
درست التي المواد امتعOct 12, 2010 III Techniques for Participation 37
http://skfupm.com
III Techniques for ParticipationOct 12, 2010 Part I 38
Did you find anything worth trying?
Oct 12, 2010 III Techniques for Participation 39