Upload
kylee
View
37
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
How to Think about Prolog - 2. Mike’s Prolog Tutorial 6 Oct 2011. Recap. Initial Problem: compute set of fully specified goal states reachable from initial state Discovered: counter productive to compute Reformulated problem: cheaply compute set that is a close upper bound approximation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
How to Think about Prolog - 2
Mike’s Prolog Tutorial6 Oct 2011
Recap
• Initial Problem: compute set of fully specified goal states reachable from initial state
• Discovered: counter productive to compute • Reformulated problem: cheaply compute set that
is a close upper bound approximation• Informally verified that this is still correct for our
context• From reformulation, became clear that our
problem can be seen as a CSP
CSP
• Set of variables with their respective domains• Set of constraints on and between variables• CSP = find a set of assignments of values to vars
(from their domains) such that all constraints are satisfied.
• For our problem:– What are the variables?– Their domains?– What are the constraints?
Variables
• For each vehicle we have variables that state – Where its location is (X,Y)– Its orientation– Its length
• For each variable type we have a finite domain
Constraints
• Goal constraint: redCar must be in goal loc
• Consistency constraint: no 2 vehicles can occupy the same location
• Need to refine the notion of vehicles occupying same location
• Refine notion of vehicle occupying a location
Vehicle Occupying a Location• Remember, that at(Vehicle, X, Y) states highest leftmost
X,Y coords of where it is locatedoccupy(Vehicle, X, Y) :-
at(Vehicle, X, Y); at(Vehicle, X-1, Y),
orientation(Vehicle, horizontal); at(Vehicle, X-2, Y), orientation(Vehicle, horizontal), length(Vehicle, 3); ... for vertical direction