26
How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

How Leadership for Technology Is DistributedAmong Leaders,

Followers, and The Situation

-Sara DexterUniversity of Virginia

Page 2: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Download PPT and handout

>http://sdexter.net/dexter-present.ppt

>http://sdexter.net/dexter-handout.doc

>Courses I teach at http://etl.edschool.virginia.edu

Page 3: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Distributed Leadership

A focus on leadership PRACTICE:>“the interactions between

leaders, followers, and their situation”•“leaders act in situations that are defined

by other’s actions”•in a situation “its routines, tools, and

structures define leadership practice”» Professor James Spillane, Northwestern

University

Page 4: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Practice

Leadership Practice

Interactions Among

Leaders,Followers, Situation

Classroom Practice

Interactions Among

Teacher,Students, Curriculum

Page 5: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Interactions Between

Situation

Leaders,Followers

Page 6: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

The Situation Shapes Leadership Practice

>Tools, Routines, & Structures– Means to an end– Concrete illustrations of leaders’

intentions– Developed responses that routinize

leadership practice for intended goals– Constrain and enable– Shape organization, and relationships

>= Artifacts

Page 7: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Artifacts of Practice

>Tools– “a mediating device that shapes interactions between

two people” • Improvement plan, observation protocol, student assessment

data

>Routines– Interactional, “repetitive, recognizable, pattern of

interdependent actions” • Meetings, annual SOL cycle of readying and testing

>Structures – Conditions or characteristics:

• Time / schedule, school size, departments or teams, accountability, governance

Page 8: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Interactions Between

Page 9: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Distributed Leadership

A focus on leadership PRACTICE:>“the interactions between

leaders, followers, and their situation”•“leaders act in situations that are defined

by other’s actions”•in a situation “its routines, tools, and

structures define leadership practice”» Professor James Spillane, Northwestern

University

Page 10: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Analytical Perspective

>Who is a leader?– Role-based vs. Expertise-based

• Sources of influence• Relative responsibilities, accountability

>What is leadership?– System of Practice vs. Trait or Behavior

• Systemic view• How interactions are fostered, their depth

and quality

Page 11: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Discuss

>What does taking a distributed leadership perspective highlight for you about your role and work as a school leader?

Page 12: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

School Technology Leadership What we

know>Team of people

– Principal, Technology Integrators, Teacher Leaders

>Leadership best predictor of integration– Rather than infrastructure or $$ spent

>Vision is Key– Serves as an organizing concept

Page 13: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Outcomes of School Technology

Leadership Classroom Level > Integration aids

teaching and learning

> Integration is strategic and effective

School Level> Supportive Context

> Enablers maximized

> The organization “learns”

Page 14: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Outcomes of School Technology

Leadership Classroom-level

Integration> 1. Learning outcomes

drive the selection of technology.

> 2. Technology use provides added value to teaching and learning.

> 3. Technology assists in the assessment of the learning outcomes.

School-levelImplementation

> 4. Ready access to supported, managed technology is provided.

> 5. Professional development is targeted at successful technology integration.

> 6. Professional community enhances integration and implementation.

Page 15: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Outcomes of School Technology

Leadership Integration> 1. Learning outcomes

drive the selection of technology.

> 2. Technology use provides added value to teaching and learning.

> 3. Technology assists in the assessment of the learning outcomes.

Implementation> 4. Ready access to

supported, managed technology is provided.

> 5. Professional development is targeted at successful technology integration.

> 6. Professional community enhances integration and implementation.

Leadership by teams to accomplish outcomes

Page 16: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Discuss

>At your school, to what degree have you accomplished the technology

– Integration outcomes?

– Implementation outcomes?

Page 17: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

A Distributed Approach to Technology Leadership

>Increases Success via Team Method– More needs represented– More expertise included

>Recognizes recursive effect – leaders act in situations that are defined

by other’s actions– in a situation its routines, tools, and

structures define leadership practice

Page 18: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Leadership

>Definition: To exert influence in a particular direction

>Core functions1. To set direction2. To develop people’s capacity for that

direction3. To restructure the organization to

support that direction

Page 19: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Outcomes of School Technology

Leadership Integration> 1. Learning outcomes

drive the selection of technology.

> 2. Technology use provides added value to teaching and learning.

> 3. Technology assists in the assessment of the learning outcomes.

Implementation> 4. Ready access to

supported, managed technology is provided.

> 5. Professional development is targeted at successful technology integration.

> 6. Professional community enhances integration and implementation.

Teams •Set direction•Develop people•Make the org. work

to accomplish outcomes

Page 20: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Leadership & Classroom Practice

25% of impact on student achievement

75% of impact on student achievement

Leadership Practice

Interactions Among

Leaders,Followers, Situation

Classroom Practice

Interactions Among

Teachers,Students, Curriculum

Page 21: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Technology Leadership

Leadership Practice

Interactions Among

Leaders,Followers, Situation

Classroom Practice

Interactions Among

Teachers,Students, Curriculum

Situation’s Artifacts

--tools

--routines

--structures

•Set direction

•Develop people

•Make org work for

Integration & Implementation

Outcomes

Page 22: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Artifacts That Set Direction

>To Set Direction– Identify and

articulate a vision– Foster the

acceptance of group goals

– Create high performance expectations

Tools, Routines, Structures– Technology vision-

statement• Relates to student learning

– Regular mtg. discussion about priority of tech

– Observation protocol for FB on quality of integration

• Indicators of current status and progress

Page 23: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Artifacts That Develop People

>To Develop People– Offer intellectual

stimulation– Provide

individualized support

– Provide an appropriate model

Tools, Routines, Structures– Choice from among topics

and ways to learn– Professional development

• Content area specific• focused on in-depth

understanding• Long-term learning goals set

– Availability of 1:1 help– PLCs discuss, observe, give

feedback on efforts

Page 24: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Artifacts That Make Org. Work

>To Make the Organization Work– Strengthen School

Cultures– Modify

organizational structures

– Build collaborative practices

Tools, Routines, Structures– Policies encouraging teacher

empowerment and professional community

– Tools for knowledge building, networked storage, time to meet

– Physical proximity /interdependence with other integrators

– Goal and vision consensus with external community

Page 25: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Discuss

At your school, what leadership practices(artifacts: tools, routines, structures)

1.influence integration outcomes?(classroom technology integration practices)

2.create favorable implementation conditions?

Page 26: How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia

Analysis Focus

> Enabling Practices: – For technology outcomes being met,

what tools, routines, and structures facilitate?

> Constraining Practices:– For technology outcomes NOT being met,

what tools, routines, and structures are missing? What interventions are needed?

> Is Team Coordinated and Open to Input? – For setting direction, developing people, and

making the organization work?