Upload
marvin-lucas
View
227
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
History of Cosmological History of Cosmological ReionizationReionization
• History of cosmic structure formationHistory of cosmic structure formation
• Observational constraints on Observational constraints on reionizationreionization
• Reionization process calculationsReionization process calculations
• Numerical radiative transfer simulationsNumerical radiative transfer simulations
• Detecting first galaxiesDetecting first galaxies
• ConclusionsConclusions
Renyue Cen Princeton University Observatory
@End of Dark Ages Workshop (STScI)March 14, 2006
• Adiabatic, Gaussian, scale-free density perturbation• --- Baryons 5% --- Cold Dark Matter 23% --- Dark Energy (cosmological constant?) 72%
Spergel etal (2003)
consistent with:• Inflation • Light element nucleosynthesis• q0 from SNe Ia• H0 (HST key project, SNe Ia)• Age of the universe (stellar evolution)
The Standard Cosmological The Standard Cosmological Model Model
n=0.99, 8 = 0.9, bh2=0.024,
xh2 = 0.126, H0 = 72, = 0.71
(subject to adjustments in 2 days)
WHIM
Time
Recom-bination
RealDarkAges
Pop III StarsGalaxiesQuasars1st Reion
Lya forestMajority of QuasarsEllipticals
Majority ofGalaxyClustersLSS
Redshift
z=1100 30 – 15 6 - 1 1 - 0
0.0003 13 Gyr
Cosmic Cosmic TimelineTimeline in Standard in Standard ModelModel
10-6
2nd genGalaxiesQuasarsFinal Reion
3000 K
Hierarchical structure formation ………………………………….. Log(Mnl) 105 106 108 109 1012 1014
10000 K
100K
106K
Temp
1: SDSS QSOs: neutral hydrogen fraction neutral hydrogen fraction changes from 10changes from 10-4-4 to to >10>10-2-2 from z=5.8 to 6.3 from z=5.8 to 6.3
Put Fan fig6 here
Cen & McDonald (2002) Fan et al (2002)
SDSS 1030+0524z=6.28
Observ. Constraints on Observ. Constraints on ReionizationReionization
Naïve implication: ee=0.03-0.04=0.03-0.04
More new z>6 quasars
White, Becker, Fan, Strauss (2003)
2: WMAP (12: WMAP (1stst Yr): Yr): ee=0.17 +- =0.17 +- 0.04 0.04
What does it mean?
zzriri=20=20+10 +10 -9-9
(assuming x=nHI/nHtot=0)
Bennett et al (2003)
Kogut et al. 2003
Hui & Haiman (2002)
3: Ly forest: zzriri < 9-10 < 9-10Hui & Haiman 2003; Theuns et al 2002
One viable pre-WMAP physical model: Universe Was Reionized Twice!
(Cen 2003a; Wyithe & Loeb 2003)
Solution: Prolonged Reionization Solution: Prolonged Reionization ProcessProcess
Quasar space density Star formation rate
(Haiman, Abel & Madau 2001)
log
[dlo
g [d
* * /d
t/d
t // MM
y
ryr-1-1 M
pc M
pc-3-3]]
log
[n(z
) / n
(pea
k)]
log
[n(z
) / n
(pea
k)]
redshiftredshift redshiftredshift
Z Z
0
-1
1
2
? ?
What could reionize the universe What could reionize the universe early: early: More ionizing photons wanted More ionizing photons wanted
Recent theoretical works suggest a new picture for Pop III IMF (Nakamura & Umemura 2001, 2002; Abel et al 2002; Bromm et al 2002):
Pop III IMF may be very top-heavy, possibly with most of the stars with mass >~ 100 M>~ 100 Msunsun
Abel et al (2002)
IMF for Population III (First) StarsIMF for Population III (First) Stars
Bromm et al (2002)
Tan & McKee (2002, 2004): The mass of Pop III stars is likely
to fall in the range of M = 30-100 Msun
due to stellar feedback processes
Based on abundance patterns of extremely metal-poor Galactic stars:
Oh et al. (2001), Qian & Wasserburg (2002): M>140 Msun
PISN with no r-process elements
Umeda & Nomoto (2004),Tumlinson, Venkatesan, & Shull (2004): M=10-140Msun
Type II supernovae/hypernovae
Observ. Case: Massive Pop III Observ. Case: Massive Pop III StarsStars
Ionizing photon emission Ionizing photon emission efficiencyefficiency
Pop III M*=10-300Msun: eUV=40,000-100,000 photons/baryon
Salpeter IMF Z=0.01Zsun : eUV=3500 photons/baryon
Bromm, Kudritzkl & Loeb (2001)
eUV(Pop III)/eUV(Pop II)
=10-30
= photon production rate/photon destruction rate = photon production rate/photon destruction rate
= c= c** f fescesc (df (df**/dt) e/dt) eUVUV/ C(1+z)/ C(1+z)3 3
Double peaks: one @zDouble peaks: one @z11~15-30, the other@z~15-30, the other@z22~6-10~6-10
• cc**: star formation efficiency (unknown): star formation efficiency (unknown)
• ffescesc: ionizing photon escape fraction (unknown): ionizing photon escape fraction (unknown)
• eeUVUV: ionizing photon production efficiency: ionizing photon production efficiency
• dfdf**/dt: halo formation rate (computable)/dt: halo formation rate (computable)
• C: gas clumping factor (constrained) C: gas clumping factor (constrained)
Existence of double peaks in Existence of double peaks in
A closer look: a pre-WMAP A closer look: a pre-WMAP modelmodel
Evolution of neutral hydrogen fraction
Redshift
nH
I/nH
tot &
nH
II/nH
tot
Cen (2003a)
Recent additional constraints:
Wyithe & Loeb (2004):x=a few x 10% @z~6.3based on QSO Stromgren sphere size
Mesinger & Haiman (2004,ApJ):x>=0.2 @z~6.3based on QSO Stromgren sphere size
Haiman & Cen (2005,ApJ):x=<0.25 @z~6.5based on LAE LF
Malhotra & Rhoads (2004,ApJ):x<1 @z~6.5based on LAE LF
White’s talk (2006):x~0.03 based on Stromgren sphere sizes.
Totani’s talk (2006):X < 0.6 based on GRB spectra
=0.10 +- 0.03
XHI=0.1 – 0.3@z=6-12
Evolution of the mean IGM temperature
Redshift
Mean IG
M tem
perature (K
)
Post-WMAP: implications on Pop III Post-WMAP: implications on Pop III star formation processes star formation processes
• Without Pop III massive stars: e < 0.09
• With Pop III massive stars and reasonable star formation efficiency and ionizing photon escape fraction: e =0.09---0.12
• With an inefficient metal enrichment process and Pop III massive stars: e = 0.15 possible
• To reach e = 0.17 requires either (1) ns >=1.03
or (2) c*(H2, III) > 0.01, or (3) photon escape fraction very high for Pop III
Cen (2003b)
A more detailed calculation A more detailed calculation (Wyithe & Cen 2006, astro-ph/0602503)(Wyithe & Cen 2006, astro-ph/0602503)
Redshift
fcrit/f
Jeans
• Separate treatments of halo gas and IGM in metal enrichment• Follow Pop III/II with a gradual transition determined by metals• Include photoionization feedback and minihalo screening effects
New results from this more New results from this more detailed calculation detailed calculation (Wyithe & Cen (Wyithe & Cen 2006)2006)
• Without Pop III massive stars: e < 0.05-0.06, with a rapidly increasing xHI
to >0.5 by z=8• With Pop III massive stars and reasonable star formation efficiency and ionizing photon escape fraction: e =0.09---0.12, with an extended
plateau of xHI =0.1-0.3 at z=7-12
• With perhaps too generous assumptions about Pop III star formation processes (very high escape fraction and/or very high star formation efficiency), e = 0.21 max is possible.
Which one would I bet on? Physical sanity would eliminate the last choice. Physical reasonableness for Pop III IMF would then argue for the second choice. So e =0.09---0.12 seems most likely, same as I got 4 years ago.
Judgement day: Thursday, March 16, 2006 (3rd Yr WMAP results)
A 24-billion-particle radiation transfer simulation of A 24-billion-particle radiation transfer simulation of detailed detailed cosmological reionization process (Trac & Cen cosmological reionization process (Trac & Cen 2006)2006)
Particle mass=2x106, Box size=100Mpc/h, timestep determined by cNcell=120003, Spatial resolution=8kpc comoving
Ok, bets placed, that is all fine! Ok, bets placed, that is all fine! But,But,
How much do you REALLY How much do you REALLY know know about first galaxies?about first galaxies?
A 21-cm probe of individual first galaxies
using CMB as the background radio sourcewith an antenna temperature of TCMB
T = (Ts-TCMB)(1-e-)
TCMB = 85K, TIGM=18K @z=30
The structure of a first galaxy
Threshold by X-ray Background Heating
Halo Mass
Num
ber per cubic M
pc
Brightness temperature decrement profile
Fundamental Applications with First Galaxies
• Probe IMF, nProbe IMF, nss, m, mCDM CDM , …, …
at n(gal)=1.e-6/Mpcat n(gal)=1.e-6/Mpc33 nnss=0.01 (3=0.01 (3))
• Determine PDetermine Pkk:: V=100 GpcV=100 Gpc33 within z=28-32 within z=28-32 such as baryonic oscillations, etc., without messysuch as baryonic oscillations, etc., without messy astrophysical biases astrophysical biases
• Alcock-Paczynski (AP) test:Alcock-Paczynski (AP) test: assuming each measurement 20% error,assuming each measurement 20% error, with 10,000 galaxies with 10,000 galaxies w=0.012 (3w=0.012 (3),),
if if MM=0.3 (no error) and k=0=0.3 (no error) and k=0
Abundance of 21-cm absorption halos
Square arcseconds
Mean IG
M tem
perature (K
)
Theory: MHzG~108-109Msun
Observed LAEs at z>6: SFR>40Msun/yr (Hu et al 2003;
Kodaira et al 2003),assuming c*=0.10, tsb=5x107yrs---> MLAE (total) = 1x1011Msun
Thus, the current observations of z>6 LAEs do not probe the bulk
of first galaxies;typical observed LAEs at z<6
have SFR~a few Msun/yr (Rhoads et al 2003; Taniguchi et al 2003)
Typical low high-z galaxies Typical low high-z galaxies
Cen (2003c)
(r)= 1.2x(M/0.27)-1(b/0.047)[(Rs
2-r2sin2)1/2-r cos]-1 ,where Rs and r are in proper Mpc
Rs= 4.3x-1/3(N/1.3x1057s-1)1/3(tQ/2x107yr)1/3[(1+zQ)/7.28]-1 Mpc
Cen & Haiman (2000)
Quasar Stromgren spheresQuasar Stromgren spheresCen (2003c)
(1): probing ionization state of IGM (1): probing ionization state of IGM and and sizes of Stromgren spheres sizes of Stromgren spheres
Rs=3Mpc
Rs=5Mpc
x=0.01 0.1 1.0
Evidently, (i) x=0.1 and x=0.01 differentiated at >6 level(ii) Rs determined to high accuracy; consequently,tQ determined accurately
Application of high-z galaxies Application of high-z galaxies inside quasar Stromgren inside quasar Stromgren spheresspheres
Cen (2003)
(2) galaxy luminosity function and (2) galaxy luminosity function and spatial spatial
distributions at z>6distributions at z>6
(3) probing environment around (3) probing environment around quasarsquasars
(4) probing anisotropy of quasar (4) probing anisotropy of quasar
emissionemission
… …
Application of first galaxies Application of first galaxies inside quasar Stromgren inside quasar Stromgren spheres, cont.spheres, cont.
• The universe has a long reionizationThe universe has a long reionization
process (Wyithe & Cen 2006).process (Wyithe & Cen 2006).
• The star formation processes at high-z The star formation processes at high-z
may be quite different from those for may be quite different from those for
low-z and local star formationlow-z and local star formation
• 33rdrd+…… year WMAP data should+…… year WMAP data should
give us a lot firmer informationgive us a lot firmer information
Conclusions Conclusions
• A profitable way to detect high-z galaxies A profitable way to detect high-z galaxies may be to target high-z observed luminous may be to target high-z observed luminous quasars, which provide a set of interesting quasars, which provide a set of interesting applicationsapplications
• Radio observations of 21-cm line may Radio observations of 21-cm line may provide a unique way to detect the very first provide a unique way to detect the very first galaxies at z=30-40, which could potentially galaxies at z=30-40, which could potentially provide a set of fundamental applications.provide a set of fundamental applications.